Section 744 of the mortgages they hold to an end.
(1) When the debt guaranteed by the suspension of the statute and not otherwise.
(2) when released by the mortgage to the mortgage book is important.
(3) When the mortgage out.
(4) The withdrawal of the mortgage.
(5) The auction of the mortgaged property by a court order due to the forced withdrawal of a mortgage or a mortgage.
(6) on the property where the mortgage off.
Section 745 to require the mortgagee, mortgage loan insurance, even when they expire at the time. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage can not exceed five years.
Section 746 payments, whether any of it completely or partly. To settle any debt it agreed to modify mortgages or mortgage debt as collateral if it is any good is to be registered with the competent authority on the request of the user. Stakeholders. Otherwise, you shall not raise as a defense to a third party.
Supreme Court in 5831/2553.
The contract claim against the defendant before the court by the defendant admitted that the compromise is. According to the indictment against his obligations under the promissory notes and installment debt. If the petitioner fails to make mortgage and other property seized from the defendant's sale of oil. The money to repay her in full. The court sentenced them under the compromise agreement. The defendant admitted that the debt owed under the promissory note to the Chairman. Not suspended, and defendant also agreed that if the defendant defaulted. I seized the mortgage insurance obligations under the promissory notes issued to fry. Money market debt to the claimant. That the defendant plead guilty under any mortgage debt on the device with the promissory note and mortgage debt as collateral to settle the back end. Mortgage loan agreement is not terminated by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744, who was the mortgagee has the right to obtain payment from the auction of the mortgaged property. Before other creditors under Section 289 Civil Procedure Code
Supreme Court in 3796/2552.
Royal Act issued under the provisions of Section 8. The Tax Exemption (No. 418) BE 2547 and the one commandment that want to tax under Part 2 and Part 3, Chapter 3, specific business tax and stamp duty under Section 5 of Chapter 6 of Title 2 of the Code. Receivables from financial institutions provide. For the money it receives from the transfer of property to others, as financial institutions and instruments for action arising from the transfer of such property. The financial institution must take account of such income to repay the creditors. Financial institution Which has been restructured in accordance with the restructuring. Debt of financial institutions, the Bank shall not exceed the portion of the debt owed to financial institutions or obligations. Financial institutions, insurance contract in accordance with the procedures and conditions prescribed by the Commissioner of Taxation and the second paragraph stipulates that the transfer of real estate and the equity thereof. Must be made between January 1, 2547 to December 31, 2547, and a real estate mortgage loans as collateral for the debt of the institution. Paid prior to November 1, 2543 plaintiff must comply with the Revolutionary Council No. 286 dated November 24, 2515 Article 12, which requires the plaintiff requesting the appropriation of land owned by the plaintiff is required to deal with contingencies. The appropriation of land without any encumbrances. Land Control Board is authorized to allocate them. Plaintiff and the bank has made an agreement in writing, the land is mortgaged. Termination of mortgage insurance. And release the mortgage has been registered with the competent registrar legal rights and even then the plaintiff has not paid his debt to the bank to release the mortgage with the bank book. As a result, mortgage, hold the end of the Section 744 (2) the sale of real estate was sold to the plaintiff's property without a mortgage as security for the debt of financial institutions, the plaintiff is not entitled to benefit from. personal income tax exemption. Local business tax and income tax for income derived from. Transfer of property from
Supreme Court in 1679/2551.
Debt due for repayment of debt incurred by the verdict of the court, as they have already reached the age of 10 years and counting, but while it may be entitled to claim under Section 193 /. 193/12 and Section 32 on both the debtor fails to pay his debts, according to the verdict by the first installment payable on July 8, 2537 may be entitled to claim the award as he has from the date of July 9, 2537, the creditor shall apply. liquidation of the debtor's assets, both on December 22, 2547 and expires 10 years from the date may be entitled to claim it. To terminate the go.
The debtor in a bankruptcy case ever filed against an official who requested the meeting. Consider reducing the outstanding debt to a debtor to redeem the mortgaged property. It is a debt to official creditors. And creditors, the court has seized mortgage loans within a period of 10 years, according to court P.wi.p. Section 271 is not the case that a debtor's creditors under the debt-claim. Not act as any other effect is the same with the prosecution under Section 193/14 (a) and (5) to cause a break down the trip.
The debt to the debtor's creditors in the mortgaged property, which applies to a mortgage in the civil เจ้าพนักงานบังคับคดี strip. And filed an application for repayment under the conditions. Insolvency Act 2483 Section 96 (3), and even terminate the debt guarantee, the creditor is still entitled to enforce their payment. Income from mortgaged property of a debtor to the mortgage. This will force the interest payable prior to the date of court protection. Assets of the debtor to a baby any more than five years under Section 745 and Section 193/27.
Supreme Court in 1535/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable to pay a debt as the mortgage loan and overdraft. And asked the defendant to 2 to 7, as assignee of the property by the mortgage liability attached to the mortgagee is entitled to. Receive payment from the mortgage asset, mortgage by the transferee of the mortgaged property in accordance with Section 735 of the case and the obligations which can not be separated from each other by Civil Procedure Code Section 59. (1) the defendant's two prescription claims for more than five years of unpaid interest to fight. As a result of a defendant as well.
Section 745 stipulates that "the mortgagee to the mortgagor. Even when the insurance shall terminate the debt already. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage, not exceeding five years "means. Mortgagee can not enforce a mortgage debt would terminate the insurance or not, but shall not enforce against the interest owed on the mortgage debt of more than five years, so even the president does not expire. Plaintiff would be entitled to claim interest from the first defendant owed no more than five years.
Supreme Court in 6221/2550.
The first mortgage on the land as a collateral agreement that the mortgage debt and other obligations of the district, was mortgaged to the bank a. The existing and the future in every way. All types of debt. The amount of $ 500,000 and agreed to the contract, Article 2 states that the mortgage debt and other obligations. Mortgaged as security for debts and commitments of all types and all that with the mortgagee in this time and will continue in the future. The liabilities and obligations of a particular type. Either suspend or end. But there are also other types of assets, liabilities and obligations or to continue in future contracts. Do not hold the mortgages as securities to be bound to see that the land is not only to insure that the plaintiff recover from defendant. Under the loan agreement. It is also guaranteed the debt of all types will be liable to the plaintiff by the defendant when the plaintiff has a debt to the defendant at Rangsit. Pathumthani, Thailand. Despite a legal obligation arising from the defendant's branch. The debt owed to the plaintiff, the defendant can be considered as well. The plaintiff is also liable for the debt to the defendant under this mortgage. The plaintiff will pay the plaintiff recover from defendant in the Rose completed the mortgage will not hold the back end. Defendants have the right to redeem the land to the plaintiff was not registered.
Supreme Court in 3496/2549.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into a compromise by the court not to. In the compromise agreement in accordance with Article 2.10 of the defendant's transfer of land to the plaintiff's Certificate. If the defendant refuses to take the case to show intent. But while the compromise agreement. Defendant was under the compromise agreement on transfer of land to an outsider to 2.10. The defendant can not be transferred to the plaintiff. As for the compromise agreement. But the compromise agreement did not specify the need for land to the defendant if the defendant can not be transferred, even under the compromise agreement, Article 6 states that if a defendant fails to do one. The defendant allowed the plaintiff in court immediately. It does not mean that if the defendant can not be transferred to land under the company's ten. Compromise settlement of land disputes in accordance with Article 2, including the compromise agreement and 2.10 to the plaintiff and the defendant must pay the price of land to the plaintiff, the plaintiff can not ask the Court to order sale of land ten to pay the price. Land under the compromise agreement and 2.10 if the defendant breaches the contract in any way. Admonish the defendant that the plaintiff will have to go again.
Supreme Court in 1418/2549.
A. land and building as collateral for a debt which the plaintiff and / or district, the defendant and the plaintiff district, the mortgage debt as collateral to separate different sections.debt of the district, continues to exist under the mortgage. The defendant transferred the property to the mortgagee of the district, not the plaintiff's liability as a mortgage. As of the plaintiff as assignee of the mortgage assets that have the right to redeem. Mortgage that still has remaining obligations under Section 736 and Section 738, if the mortgagee that the mortgage is extinguished under Section 744 (4) When the defendant but the defendant to pay the debt. Book your debt. The plaintiff did not redeem the mortgage. The plaintiff has no claim to the defendant to the plaintiff had registered the redemption of the mortgage.
Supreme Court to 667/2549.
The loan agreement includes an agreement to increase overdraft loan, overdraft which The current contract must be on time. The current contract is independent of a particular contract. The agreement will remain in the next book will have widespread and continuous. Within a reasonable time. The fact that Saturday.'ve Put money into the account for the deductive part of the current account of the final on March 14, 2526, then the current account is again from the date of Saturday. Died a long time, almost 12 years show that pharmacist. with the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default. The plaintiff is a financial institution has the duty to inspect the accounts of customers at that time. The movement, however. When the pharmacist. This is a customer of the plaintiff is no account activity. The plaintiff would have to claim or to terminate the contract in a reasonable time. Exercise is not to take excessive interest in a long time like this. Held that the exercise of the plaintiff did not act in good faith. The contract is considered dissolved from within. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default, is dated March 14, 2526, the day Saturday. Current account one last time. The plaintiff's claim for recovery under the overdraft has occurred since then. Claims under the contract is scheduled for the 10-year-old plaintiff, the case was filed on February 5, 2539 expiration of the 10-year lease liability so as to terminate the account. However, it appears that yet. To the land and buildings are mortgaged as collateral for a loan in the amount of 5.5 million U.S., plus interest at a rate of 15 percent per year, with the agreement that if the plaintiff, the mortgage money, not enough pay. allow the take of debt. Property until the debt under the account will expire at. It must be a Section 193/27 and Section 745, the plaintiff is the mortgagee to enforce payment of the mortgage assets, even when the debt. The mortgage insurance is to expire the next time. Be forced to pay interest on the unpaid after more than five years old. And remain in force only within the property. Mortgaged only. Forces of other assets can not. Although the mortgage contract is scheduled to be removed from the property until the end. If the mortgage is not enough money to pay their debts.
(Meeting No. 3 / 2548).
Supreme Court in 7539/2548.
The defendant owed the plaintiff mortgagee of land plots with buildings of 10 defendants in a civil case by case, according to her. When the defendant fails to pay the debt, the plaintiff requested the court issue a court seized mortgage. The defendants then sold out in 8 plots of land and the redemption of the mortgaged property to the defendant, a second mortgage is extinguished by the end of Section 744 on the plaintiff to the debt owed to the applicant. The defendants filed for bankruptcy under. After the plaintiff's rights under the mortgage agreement to be suspended. Plaintiffs are not creditors who are entitled to the assets of the debtor in a way. Mortgage filed in the bankruptcy case must comply with the rules of Section 10 (2) of the Bankruptcy Act of 2483.
Supreme Court in 1023/2548.
New. Contract with a bank overdraft of the defendant as a store locator with land as collateral Sat. The plaintiff was the one with the. Borrowing from a bank branch accused Reserved. The plaintiff's two land as collateral. Debt of the two branches of the same. And the plaintiff entered into a mortgage as security for the full amount of debt, but the contract agreement, mortgage loan insurance available to the defendant, in Bang. It is separate from the credit available to the defendant in a store locator. Are not related and interrelated, so that the debt of all types of insurance, all in agreement at the end of the mortgage contract. The plaintiff and the defendants of liability insurance as a store locator means each contract. In each category, including debt, and one branch each. 1 and is on the plaintiff. Repayments under the loan agreement for the defendant, in Bang. The president is due to the suspension. Mortgage debt under the debt they hold the device in accordance with Section 744 (a) it is. A debt under an existing overdraft against any defendant in a store locator.
Supreme Court in 8160/2547.
Since the plaintiff and the loan agreement with the defendant by the plaintiff's overdraft with the mortgaged land. The plaintiff to the defendant to insure that the mortgage loan agreement. Plaintiff agreed to convert the land to secure debts and other obligations. Since the plaintiff or defendant to the mortgagee. Both are available now and will be held in future in all aspects of all types of debt are on this dispute is about the enforcement of the mortgage contract is not in dispute. The settlements of the overdraft loan agreement. It is important to consider the enforcement of the mortgage contract. The plaintiff may recover payments under the overdraft to the defendant to complete, but BC is still a defendant in a debt and debt since the debt is the subject of the land to the plaintiff to the defendant. The mortgage of land as collateral, it is not clear or settle the back end.
Supreme Court in 3987/2546.
The plaintiff made a loan to the defendant. The land under the Certificate and the building as collateral for a loan and agree a contract at the end of the mortgage, the mortgage contract states that land and buildings as collateral for loans of all types. The mortgage debt, mortgage debt in this period will be given later in the future? As such terms are defined explicitly as such in the land. It is as collateral for a loan of money to the plaintiff and defendant. The debt insurance is all that the plaintiff would be liable to the other defendants. When it appears that the defendant owed a debt purchase agreement, promissory note to the defendant. Held that the plaintiff has a debt to the defendant liable under the mortgage agreement exists. Although the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff recover of the defendant is complete. The mortgage did not settle the back end. Defendants have the right to redeem the mortgaged land to the plaintiff's unregistered.
Supreme Court in 2791/2546.
Both the land contract. The plaintiff's mortgage as collateral for a loan or mortgage as security for debts that the road is already in a mortgage agreement or at any time. One time in the future, all the debt. The agreement to end the contract and this mortgage. The mortgage contract shall be considered as part of the mortgage contract that stated the same. "Because of the mortgaged property as security for the debt contracted in the mortgage and debt-to-face with the mortgagor and mortgagee have agreed that as long as it does not take a mortgage. Redemption of mortgage for any reason, the mortgagor and the mortgagee to the mortgage contract shall remain in force. To guarantee repayment of the debt will occur in the future with the mortgagee, "the memorandum states that the money will land. Conditions and other agreements to comply in all respects as the original mortgage contract. Road to the debt payment on account of credit card debt is the debt of the road to the plaintiff, after the mortgage while it does not take. Home mortgage refinancing. Mortgage loan insurance is indeed an overdraft and credit card debt as well. Under the terms of the mortgage contract. That the overdraft and credit card application does not specify that the land-based. Mortgage insurance is a contract that is why the plaintiff is not liable under the terms of the mortgage contract, the plaintiff can not even repay the loan to the plaintiff and the road is complete. The plaintiff was not out of the mortgage debt. The plaintiff has no right to redeem the mortgage is registered and delivered to the defendant's land. Certificate (Nor Sor 3 Kor), a mortgage, including the right to claim damages from the defendants.
Supreme Court in 2659/2546.
The plaintiff notified the defendant, the victim's heirs for payment. Notice of termination of the mortgage and loan agreements that do not die in debt. The loan will be liable to the plaintiff, who died at the end to hold the mortgage debt. This device is not suspended.
Plaintiff's transfer of business from Metropolitan Bank Limited (PCL) to the plaintiff. The plaintiff must transfer the rights and duties of the Metropolitan Bank Limited (PLC) on Bangkok City Bank Public Company Limited () payable on the death of the debtor from the date of March 8, 2539 plaintiff must be aware of it, too. Plaintiffs filed suit on March 28, 2543 was a year overdue action to terminate the plaintiff, and that is why the debt is guaranteed by the defendant, a device made out of liability to the plaintiff. However, the loan is insured by a mortgage as a debt under the loan debt will expire at the president. The plaintiff, a creditor with the rights of creditors to be exercised. The force of the mortgaged property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1754, paragraph three of Article 193 / 27 and still in force, but only for a specific property that may be forced to mortgage the property. Another of the dead can not. The mortgage contract will see a message stating that the creditor is entitled to seize other assets of the debtor. The repayment in the event of insufficient assets to repay their mortgages.
Supreme Court in 5218/2545.
T. Land disputes of the auction by a court order in good faith and sell them. The rights of the petitioner in good faith but. And he was later accused of a land dispute to the plaintiff mortgaged by the law. The mortgage is still no end to the suspension. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce mortgage for land taken by the civil rights of the petitioner. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744 and Section 702, paragraph two, that she has ownership of the land dispute came after the plaintiff received the mortgage, even if it was in good faith and are protected under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1330, but it is not. The rights of the plaintiff's existing waste. Petitioner is not entitled to request the release of land disputes.
Supreme Court in 4709/2545.
Representing a defendant disputes the plaintiff's own land, which the defendant The transfer of the disputed land to restore to the plaintiff by the mortgage. However, the redemption of a mortgage. Defendant, the mortgagor must pay to the mortgagee to pay the debt in full. Land disputes are to be free of mortgage. If the defendant does not follow that it may act as a court order was a condition of any debt repayment will remain open. The court sentenced the defendant to redeem the mortgage. If the defendant does not redeem the mortgage by refinancing the mortgage to the plaintiff, the defendant is free. Expense was not a judge, or in addition to the indictment.
Supreme Court in 3232/2545.
Notice of request for redemption of the mortgage debt of the two defendants with a notice to the defendant, the second payment of the plaintiff. The outstanding second defendant should not be the same if the two defendants also will pay the debt that was required by its obligations and responsibilities. Informed the plaintiff that the outstanding debt is not real. I like to argue that the second defendant to the plaintiff's expressed intent that the obligations. Individually notified of the request for payment. It also held that the defendant did not request the second payment and the plaintiff accepted the settlement because the two defendants released from liability under the guarantee, and mortgage contract under Section 701, 727, 744 (3.)
Supreme Court in 1592/2545.
Even in the land will be identified that Mortgage as security for the mortgage debt, which accused the plaintiff, the mortgagee bank at this time. The new contingent will be given on loan by the loan agreement. Debt of the mortgage insurance is suspended by the defendant to pay the loan. Plaintiffs have been completed. Mortgage contract, the debt will be extinguished with the equipment under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744 (a) the contract overdraft plaintiff and the defendant was not specified in the contract. Said land as security for overdraft loans. Interpreting the intent of the parties in case of doubt, this Civil and Commercial Code, Section 11 be interpreted in a way that is a party to the case who will be in their debt. If the plaintiff and the defendant does not agree that the land contract is guaranteed. Overdraft loans. The plaintiff is not entitled to enforce mortgage land to repay the overdraft.
Supreme Court in 3467/2543.
The mortgage and mortgage insurance is an agreement by the defendant at the District 16 and District 17 2 is made up as collateral for a loan debt that the defendant has entered into a loan to the plaintiff on November 25, 2529. By the end of the mortgage contract states that. As collateral for a debt, bank overdrafts and loans. A mortgage as security for any debt that the mortgage and the mortgagee or the defendant that a debt exists in the contract and that will happen in the next. And the agreement states that the mortgage is insured. Conditions and other agreements to be based on the original mortgage contract in all respects so. The mortgage and save money mortgage insurance is the second defendant, the defendant's liability insurance in addition to the existing first mortgage, then the contract. To insure the debt of the defendant. One that will occur in the future or the obligations that arise in the future. The defendant, a plaintiff to recover more money. The debt incurred in the future. The mortgage and save money mortgage insurance. The binding is guaranteed debt under the loan instantly without registration. Sign up for a mortgage or re mortgage.
The plaintiff is entitled to a loan agreement. The interest of the defendant at the rate of 18.5 percent per annum interest rate of such interest that the plaintiff legally entitled under the Penal Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 148, paragraph three, the first plaintiff to the defendant's interest to 18.5 percent per year, it is the plaintiff, the defendant benefits from the agreement. The plaintiff has the right to not allow the defendant to anymore. By returning to the interest rate of 18.5 percent per year under the terms of the contract. If so, it accounts for a certain amount of money promised to be a penalty on himself. Not debt settlement or debt will not be considered a penalty under the Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 379 did not.
(Second paragraph of the decision by the Conference of 10/2543).
Supreme Court in 1399/2542.
The contract states that overdraft loans. The borrower defaulted on interest rates and not in the contract. The borrower agrees to the lender to rollover the interest payable on a monthly principal and interest payments, the Army became the capital of the borrower will pay interest. Premiums at the same rate and are payable the same as specified in the contract. 2 (the day of the month), and the agreement is not enforceable until the end time will be terminated. Contract or a deductive account and to demand the repayment of debt outstanding, even when defendants. Agreement to recover the overdraft in the fifth and Home Loans. Overdraft limit, the balance of the loan, overdraft, then the defendant in the current 1.7 million by the withdrawal of cash available to withdraw money only once, after which the only defendant to deposit cash. And the plaintiff. Then compounded with interest payments on the day of the month to complete. The next payment. Then, there is no withdrawal from the account again. And deductive account in the December 31, 2537, which the defendant is a debt recovery overdraft plaintiff 1,696,182.61 U.S. close to bank overdraft 1.7 million U.S. to demonstrate the intent of the plaintiff and the defendant did not intend to. There. The spread between the book anymore, and overdraft loans, according to the plaintiff and the defendant that the deductive account. Every day of the month. Overdraft and loan agreement. Shall be dissolved on December 31, 2537 to the end on April 7, 2538, the expiration time of the plaintiff. Notice to the defendant as a loan, so from January 1, 2538 the plaintiff shall have no right to charge interest from the defendants. The Appeal Court reduced the amount of capital is lower than that. Court decision on the Appeal Court judges as a result of the time. Plaintiff's interest would be shorter than that. The court ruled. The court ruled that the interest charged by the like. The problems with public order, the defendants either did not appeal the Court of Appeal has the power to judge the defendant No. 2 is involved in this case, only a transfer of land and buildings of the defendant, one in which the defendant is a registered. mortgaged to the plaintiff and the plaintiff would love to. To receive payment of the mortgaged property before creditors in the ordinary room to examine the ownership of the property will be transferred to Third party or not. The two defendants must be given to the rights and obligations of the plaintiff and defendant, a rest. The mortgage on the property as an assignee of the mortgage assets, even later, only two defendants entered the mortgage agreement. The third one is guaranteed a 56,000 baht to mortgage debt totaling U.S. $ 1.7 million, it is registered. The amount of mortgage debt as collateral to raise The defense has accused the two parties act as stakeholders. The transfer of property which is mortgaged. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 746 allows the mortgage. Mortgage on the property, which is only 56,000 baht for the second defendant is liable to the debtor or the debtor to the defendant to a mortgage. In all the mortgage debt. Even though mortgage money saved up for the third time. Are labeled. Conditions and other agreements to be based on the original mortgage contract in all respects. It's not the defendant. 2 shall be liable for the debt amount. If the mortgage has been paid. I do not pay as stated in the memorandum to the mortgage agreement that the mortgagor made a defendant to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 5328/2542.
The land as collateral, and the book to the end of the mortgage insurance is stated expressly that the defendant in two mortgages of land to the plaintiff as collateral for a debt of loans and other liabilities which had 2 and the fact that one exists for the plaintiff as well. the time of the contract and the future of the two defendants as the property is insured by mortgage insurance contract between plaintiff and defendant No. 2 to revoke or change any guarantees, however.
The second plaintiff and the defendant made an agreement to suspend mortgage (mortgage release) stated clearly that the two sides agreed to a land from mortgage to mortgage. Apply for a permit to land, and that the plaintiff did not receive payment from the defendant's liability to the defendant, 2 2, so the plaintiff still has under the existing contract and land as collateral. Letter to the mortgage contract as security. The agreement will also release the mortgage. I have only the plaintiff can not force a settlement of the land mortgaged as security for the two defendants only. The obligation to ensure that the two defendants, and that one still exists, which is one of the two defendants to be bound to pay to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 177/2521.
The mortgage payment mortgage and the mortgagee is required under the deed is not registered. To redeem and restore the land to the mortgagee is not a mortgage lender owned. The others in the other creditors. Do not make a right. Withhold the mortgage deed was filed for the compulsory registration of mortgage and redemption. The title fee.
(1) When the debt guaranteed by the suspension of the statute and not otherwise.
(2) when released by the mortgage to the mortgage book is important.
(3) When the mortgage out.
(4) The withdrawal of the mortgage.
(5) The auction of the mortgaged property by a court order due to the forced withdrawal of a mortgage or a mortgage.
(6) on the property where the mortgage off.
Section 745 to require the mortgagee, mortgage loan insurance, even when they expire at the time. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage can not exceed five years.
Section 746 payments, whether any of it completely or partly. To settle any debt it agreed to modify mortgages or mortgage debt as collateral if it is any good is to be registered with the competent authority on the request of the user. Stakeholders. Otherwise, you shall not raise as a defense to a third party.
Supreme Court in 5831/2553.
The contract claim against the defendant before the court by the defendant admitted that the compromise is. According to the indictment against his obligations under the promissory notes and installment debt. If the petitioner fails to make mortgage and other property seized from the defendant's sale of oil. The money to repay her in full. The court sentenced them under the compromise agreement. The defendant admitted that the debt owed under the promissory note to the Chairman. Not suspended, and defendant also agreed that if the defendant defaulted. I seized the mortgage insurance obligations under the promissory notes issued to fry. Money market debt to the claimant. That the defendant plead guilty under any mortgage debt on the device with the promissory note and mortgage debt as collateral to settle the back end. Mortgage loan agreement is not terminated by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744, who was the mortgagee has the right to obtain payment from the auction of the mortgaged property. Before other creditors under Section 289 Civil Procedure Code
Supreme Court in 3796/2552.
Royal Act issued under the provisions of Section 8. The Tax Exemption (No. 418) BE 2547 and the one commandment that want to tax under Part 2 and Part 3, Chapter 3, specific business tax and stamp duty under Section 5 of Chapter 6 of Title 2 of the Code. Receivables from financial institutions provide. For the money it receives from the transfer of property to others, as financial institutions and instruments for action arising from the transfer of such property. The financial institution must take account of such income to repay the creditors. Financial institution Which has been restructured in accordance with the restructuring. Debt of financial institutions, the Bank shall not exceed the portion of the debt owed to financial institutions or obligations. Financial institutions, insurance contract in accordance with the procedures and conditions prescribed by the Commissioner of Taxation and the second paragraph stipulates that the transfer of real estate and the equity thereof. Must be made between January 1, 2547 to December 31, 2547, and a real estate mortgage loans as collateral for the debt of the institution. Paid prior to November 1, 2543 plaintiff must comply with the Revolutionary Council No. 286 dated November 24, 2515 Article 12, which requires the plaintiff requesting the appropriation of land owned by the plaintiff is required to deal with contingencies. The appropriation of land without any encumbrances. Land Control Board is authorized to allocate them. Plaintiff and the bank has made an agreement in writing, the land is mortgaged. Termination of mortgage insurance. And release the mortgage has been registered with the competent registrar legal rights and even then the plaintiff has not paid his debt to the bank to release the mortgage with the bank book. As a result, mortgage, hold the end of the Section 744 (2) the sale of real estate was sold to the plaintiff's property without a mortgage as security for the debt of financial institutions, the plaintiff is not entitled to benefit from. personal income tax exemption. Local business tax and income tax for income derived from. Transfer of property from
Supreme Court in 1679/2551.
Debt due for repayment of debt incurred by the verdict of the court, as they have already reached the age of 10 years and counting, but while it may be entitled to claim under Section 193 /. 193/12 and Section 32 on both the debtor fails to pay his debts, according to the verdict by the first installment payable on July 8, 2537 may be entitled to claim the award as he has from the date of July 9, 2537, the creditor shall apply. liquidation of the debtor's assets, both on December 22, 2547 and expires 10 years from the date may be entitled to claim it. To terminate the go.
The debtor in a bankruptcy case ever filed against an official who requested the meeting. Consider reducing the outstanding debt to a debtor to redeem the mortgaged property. It is a debt to official creditors. And creditors, the court has seized mortgage loans within a period of 10 years, according to court P.wi.p. Section 271 is not the case that a debtor's creditors under the debt-claim. Not act as any other effect is the same with the prosecution under Section 193/14 (a) and (5) to cause a break down the trip.
The debt to the debtor's creditors in the mortgaged property, which applies to a mortgage in the civil เจ้าพนักงานบังคับคดี strip. And filed an application for repayment under the conditions. Insolvency Act 2483 Section 96 (3), and even terminate the debt guarantee, the creditor is still entitled to enforce their payment. Income from mortgaged property of a debtor to the mortgage. This will force the interest payable prior to the date of court protection. Assets of the debtor to a baby any more than five years under Section 745 and Section 193/27.
Supreme Court in 1535/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable to pay a debt as the mortgage loan and overdraft. And asked the defendant to 2 to 7, as assignee of the property by the mortgage liability attached to the mortgagee is entitled to. Receive payment from the mortgage asset, mortgage by the transferee of the mortgaged property in accordance with Section 735 of the case and the obligations which can not be separated from each other by Civil Procedure Code Section 59. (1) the defendant's two prescription claims for more than five years of unpaid interest to fight. As a result of a defendant as well.
Section 745 stipulates that "the mortgagee to the mortgagor. Even when the insurance shall terminate the debt already. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage, not exceeding five years "means. Mortgagee can not enforce a mortgage debt would terminate the insurance or not, but shall not enforce against the interest owed on the mortgage debt of more than five years, so even the president does not expire. Plaintiff would be entitled to claim interest from the first defendant owed no more than five years.
Supreme Court in 6221/2550.
The first mortgage on the land as a collateral agreement that the mortgage debt and other obligations of the district, was mortgaged to the bank a. The existing and the future in every way. All types of debt. The amount of $ 500,000 and agreed to the contract, Article 2 states that the mortgage debt and other obligations. Mortgaged as security for debts and commitments of all types and all that with the mortgagee in this time and will continue in the future. The liabilities and obligations of a particular type. Either suspend or end. But there are also other types of assets, liabilities and obligations or to continue in future contracts. Do not hold the mortgages as securities to be bound to see that the land is not only to insure that the plaintiff recover from defendant. Under the loan agreement. It is also guaranteed the debt of all types will be liable to the plaintiff by the defendant when the plaintiff has a debt to the defendant at Rangsit. Pathumthani, Thailand. Despite a legal obligation arising from the defendant's branch. The debt owed to the plaintiff, the defendant can be considered as well. The plaintiff is also liable for the debt to the defendant under this mortgage. The plaintiff will pay the plaintiff recover from defendant in the Rose completed the mortgage will not hold the back end. Defendants have the right to redeem the land to the plaintiff was not registered.
Supreme Court in 3496/2549.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into a compromise by the court not to. In the compromise agreement in accordance with Article 2.10 of the defendant's transfer of land to the plaintiff's Certificate. If the defendant refuses to take the case to show intent. But while the compromise agreement. Defendant was under the compromise agreement on transfer of land to an outsider to 2.10. The defendant can not be transferred to the plaintiff. As for the compromise agreement. But the compromise agreement did not specify the need for land to the defendant if the defendant can not be transferred, even under the compromise agreement, Article 6 states that if a defendant fails to do one. The defendant allowed the plaintiff in court immediately. It does not mean that if the defendant can not be transferred to land under the company's ten. Compromise settlement of land disputes in accordance with Article 2, including the compromise agreement and 2.10 to the plaintiff and the defendant must pay the price of land to the plaintiff, the plaintiff can not ask the Court to order sale of land ten to pay the price. Land under the compromise agreement and 2.10 if the defendant breaches the contract in any way. Admonish the defendant that the plaintiff will have to go again.
Supreme Court in 1418/2549.
A. land and building as collateral for a debt which the plaintiff and / or district, the defendant and the plaintiff district, the mortgage debt as collateral to separate different sections.debt of the district, continues to exist under the mortgage. The defendant transferred the property to the mortgagee of the district, not the plaintiff's liability as a mortgage. As of the plaintiff as assignee of the mortgage assets that have the right to redeem. Mortgage that still has remaining obligations under Section 736 and Section 738, if the mortgagee that the mortgage is extinguished under Section 744 (4) When the defendant but the defendant to pay the debt. Book your debt. The plaintiff did not redeem the mortgage. The plaintiff has no claim to the defendant to the plaintiff had registered the redemption of the mortgage.
Supreme Court to 667/2549.
The loan agreement includes an agreement to increase overdraft loan, overdraft which The current contract must be on time. The current contract is independent of a particular contract. The agreement will remain in the next book will have widespread and continuous. Within a reasonable time. The fact that Saturday.'ve Put money into the account for the deductive part of the current account of the final on March 14, 2526, then the current account is again from the date of Saturday. Died a long time, almost 12 years show that pharmacist. with the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default. The plaintiff is a financial institution has the duty to inspect the accounts of customers at that time. The movement, however. When the pharmacist. This is a customer of the plaintiff is no account activity. The plaintiff would have to claim or to terminate the contract in a reasonable time. Exercise is not to take excessive interest in a long time like this. Held that the exercise of the plaintiff did not act in good faith. The contract is considered dissolved from within. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default, is dated March 14, 2526, the day Saturday. Current account one last time. The plaintiff's claim for recovery under the overdraft has occurred since then. Claims under the contract is scheduled for the 10-year-old plaintiff, the case was filed on February 5, 2539 expiration of the 10-year lease liability so as to terminate the account. However, it appears that yet. To the land and buildings are mortgaged as collateral for a loan in the amount of 5.5 million U.S., plus interest at a rate of 15 percent per year, with the agreement that if the plaintiff, the mortgage money, not enough pay. allow the take of debt. Property until the debt under the account will expire at. It must be a Section 193/27 and Section 745, the plaintiff is the mortgagee to enforce payment of the mortgage assets, even when the debt. The mortgage insurance is to expire the next time. Be forced to pay interest on the unpaid after more than five years old. And remain in force only within the property. Mortgaged only. Forces of other assets can not. Although the mortgage contract is scheduled to be removed from the property until the end. If the mortgage is not enough money to pay their debts.
(Meeting No. 3 / 2548).
Supreme Court in 7539/2548.
The defendant owed the plaintiff mortgagee of land plots with buildings of 10 defendants in a civil case by case, according to her. When the defendant fails to pay the debt, the plaintiff requested the court issue a court seized mortgage. The defendants then sold out in 8 plots of land and the redemption of the mortgaged property to the defendant, a second mortgage is extinguished by the end of Section 744 on the plaintiff to the debt owed to the applicant. The defendants filed for bankruptcy under. After the plaintiff's rights under the mortgage agreement to be suspended. Plaintiffs are not creditors who are entitled to the assets of the debtor in a way. Mortgage filed in the bankruptcy case must comply with the rules of Section 10 (2) of the Bankruptcy Act of 2483.
Supreme Court in 1023/2548.
New. Contract with a bank overdraft of the defendant as a store locator with land as collateral Sat. The plaintiff was the one with the. Borrowing from a bank branch accused Reserved. The plaintiff's two land as collateral. Debt of the two branches of the same. And the plaintiff entered into a mortgage as security for the full amount of debt, but the contract agreement, mortgage loan insurance available to the defendant, in Bang. It is separate from the credit available to the defendant in a store locator. Are not related and interrelated, so that the debt of all types of insurance, all in agreement at the end of the mortgage contract. The plaintiff and the defendants of liability insurance as a store locator means each contract. In each category, including debt, and one branch each. 1 and is on the plaintiff. Repayments under the loan agreement for the defendant, in Bang. The president is due to the suspension. Mortgage debt under the debt they hold the device in accordance with Section 744 (a) it is. A debt under an existing overdraft against any defendant in a store locator.
Supreme Court in 8160/2547.
Since the plaintiff and the loan agreement with the defendant by the plaintiff's overdraft with the mortgaged land. The plaintiff to the defendant to insure that the mortgage loan agreement. Plaintiff agreed to convert the land to secure debts and other obligations. Since the plaintiff or defendant to the mortgagee. Both are available now and will be held in future in all aspects of all types of debt are on this dispute is about the enforcement of the mortgage contract is not in dispute. The settlements of the overdraft loan agreement. It is important to consider the enforcement of the mortgage contract. The plaintiff may recover payments under the overdraft to the defendant to complete, but BC is still a defendant in a debt and debt since the debt is the subject of the land to the plaintiff to the defendant. The mortgage of land as collateral, it is not clear or settle the back end.
Supreme Court in 3987/2546.
The plaintiff made a loan to the defendant. The land under the Certificate and the building as collateral for a loan and agree a contract at the end of the mortgage, the mortgage contract states that land and buildings as collateral for loans of all types. The mortgage debt, mortgage debt in this period will be given later in the future? As such terms are defined explicitly as such in the land. It is as collateral for a loan of money to the plaintiff and defendant. The debt insurance is all that the plaintiff would be liable to the other defendants. When it appears that the defendant owed a debt purchase agreement, promissory note to the defendant. Held that the plaintiff has a debt to the defendant liable under the mortgage agreement exists. Although the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff recover of the defendant is complete. The mortgage did not settle the back end. Defendants have the right to redeem the mortgaged land to the plaintiff's unregistered.
Supreme Court in 2791/2546.
Both the land contract. The plaintiff's mortgage as collateral for a loan or mortgage as security for debts that the road is already in a mortgage agreement or at any time. One time in the future, all the debt. The agreement to end the contract and this mortgage. The mortgage contract shall be considered as part of the mortgage contract that stated the same. "Because of the mortgaged property as security for the debt contracted in the mortgage and debt-to-face with the mortgagor and mortgagee have agreed that as long as it does not take a mortgage. Redemption of mortgage for any reason, the mortgagor and the mortgagee to the mortgage contract shall remain in force. To guarantee repayment of the debt will occur in the future with the mortgagee, "the memorandum states that the money will land. Conditions and other agreements to comply in all respects as the original mortgage contract. Road to the debt payment on account of credit card debt is the debt of the road to the plaintiff, after the mortgage while it does not take. Home mortgage refinancing. Mortgage loan insurance is indeed an overdraft and credit card debt as well. Under the terms of the mortgage contract. That the overdraft and credit card application does not specify that the land-based. Mortgage insurance is a contract that is why the plaintiff is not liable under the terms of the mortgage contract, the plaintiff can not even repay the loan to the plaintiff and the road is complete. The plaintiff was not out of the mortgage debt. The plaintiff has no right to redeem the mortgage is registered and delivered to the defendant's land. Certificate (Nor Sor 3 Kor), a mortgage, including the right to claim damages from the defendants.
Supreme Court in 2659/2546.
The plaintiff notified the defendant, the victim's heirs for payment. Notice of termination of the mortgage and loan agreements that do not die in debt. The loan will be liable to the plaintiff, who died at the end to hold the mortgage debt. This device is not suspended.
Plaintiff's transfer of business from Metropolitan Bank Limited (PCL) to the plaintiff. The plaintiff must transfer the rights and duties of the Metropolitan Bank Limited (PLC) on Bangkok City Bank Public Company Limited () payable on the death of the debtor from the date of March 8, 2539 plaintiff must be aware of it, too. Plaintiffs filed suit on March 28, 2543 was a year overdue action to terminate the plaintiff, and that is why the debt is guaranteed by the defendant, a device made out of liability to the plaintiff. However, the loan is insured by a mortgage as a debt under the loan debt will expire at the president. The plaintiff, a creditor with the rights of creditors to be exercised. The force of the mortgaged property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1754, paragraph three of Article 193 / 27 and still in force, but only for a specific property that may be forced to mortgage the property. Another of the dead can not. The mortgage contract will see a message stating that the creditor is entitled to seize other assets of the debtor. The repayment in the event of insufficient assets to repay their mortgages.
Supreme Court in 5218/2545.
T. Land disputes of the auction by a court order in good faith and sell them. The rights of the petitioner in good faith but. And he was later accused of a land dispute to the plaintiff mortgaged by the law. The mortgage is still no end to the suspension. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce mortgage for land taken by the civil rights of the petitioner. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744 and Section 702, paragraph two, that she has ownership of the land dispute came after the plaintiff received the mortgage, even if it was in good faith and are protected under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1330, but it is not. The rights of the plaintiff's existing waste. Petitioner is not entitled to request the release of land disputes.
Supreme Court in 4709/2545.
Representing a defendant disputes the plaintiff's own land, which the defendant The transfer of the disputed land to restore to the plaintiff by the mortgage. However, the redemption of a mortgage. Defendant, the mortgagor must pay to the mortgagee to pay the debt in full. Land disputes are to be free of mortgage. If the defendant does not follow that it may act as a court order was a condition of any debt repayment will remain open. The court sentenced the defendant to redeem the mortgage. If the defendant does not redeem the mortgage by refinancing the mortgage to the plaintiff, the defendant is free. Expense was not a judge, or in addition to the indictment.
Supreme Court in 3232/2545.
Notice of request for redemption of the mortgage debt of the two defendants with a notice to the defendant, the second payment of the plaintiff. The outstanding second defendant should not be the same if the two defendants also will pay the debt that was required by its obligations and responsibilities. Informed the plaintiff that the outstanding debt is not real. I like to argue that the second defendant to the plaintiff's expressed intent that the obligations. Individually notified of the request for payment. It also held that the defendant did not request the second payment and the plaintiff accepted the settlement because the two defendants released from liability under the guarantee, and mortgage contract under Section 701, 727, 744 (3.)
Supreme Court in 1592/2545.
Even in the land will be identified that Mortgage as security for the mortgage debt, which accused the plaintiff, the mortgagee bank at this time. The new contingent will be given on loan by the loan agreement. Debt of the mortgage insurance is suspended by the defendant to pay the loan. Plaintiffs have been completed. Mortgage contract, the debt will be extinguished with the equipment under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744 (a) the contract overdraft plaintiff and the defendant was not specified in the contract. Said land as security for overdraft loans. Interpreting the intent of the parties in case of doubt, this Civil and Commercial Code, Section 11 be interpreted in a way that is a party to the case who will be in their debt. If the plaintiff and the defendant does not agree that the land contract is guaranteed. Overdraft loans. The plaintiff is not entitled to enforce mortgage land to repay the overdraft.
Supreme Court in 3467/2543.
The mortgage and mortgage insurance is an agreement by the defendant at the District 16 and District 17 2 is made up as collateral for a loan debt that the defendant has entered into a loan to the plaintiff on November 25, 2529. By the end of the mortgage contract states that. As collateral for a debt, bank overdrafts and loans. A mortgage as security for any debt that the mortgage and the mortgagee or the defendant that a debt exists in the contract and that will happen in the next. And the agreement states that the mortgage is insured. Conditions and other agreements to be based on the original mortgage contract in all respects so. The mortgage and save money mortgage insurance is the second defendant, the defendant's liability insurance in addition to the existing first mortgage, then the contract. To insure the debt of the defendant. One that will occur in the future or the obligations that arise in the future. The defendant, a plaintiff to recover more money. The debt incurred in the future. The mortgage and save money mortgage insurance. The binding is guaranteed debt under the loan instantly without registration. Sign up for a mortgage or re mortgage.
The plaintiff is entitled to a loan agreement. The interest of the defendant at the rate of 18.5 percent per annum interest rate of such interest that the plaintiff legally entitled under the Penal Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 148, paragraph three, the first plaintiff to the defendant's interest to 18.5 percent per year, it is the plaintiff, the defendant benefits from the agreement. The plaintiff has the right to not allow the defendant to anymore. By returning to the interest rate of 18.5 percent per year under the terms of the contract. If so, it accounts for a certain amount of money promised to be a penalty on himself. Not debt settlement or debt will not be considered a penalty under the Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 379 did not.
(Second paragraph of the decision by the Conference of 10/2543).
Supreme Court in 1399/2542.
The contract states that overdraft loans. The borrower defaulted on interest rates and not in the contract. The borrower agrees to the lender to rollover the interest payable on a monthly principal and interest payments, the Army became the capital of the borrower will pay interest. Premiums at the same rate and are payable the same as specified in the contract. 2 (the day of the month), and the agreement is not enforceable until the end time will be terminated. Contract or a deductive account and to demand the repayment of debt outstanding, even when defendants. Agreement to recover the overdraft in the fifth and Home Loans. Overdraft limit, the balance of the loan, overdraft, then the defendant in the current 1.7 million by the withdrawal of cash available to withdraw money only once, after which the only defendant to deposit cash. And the plaintiff. Then compounded with interest payments on the day of the month to complete. The next payment. Then, there is no withdrawal from the account again. And deductive account in the December 31, 2537, which the defendant is a debt recovery overdraft plaintiff 1,696,182.61 U.S. close to bank overdraft 1.7 million U.S. to demonstrate the intent of the plaintiff and the defendant did not intend to. There. The spread between the book anymore, and overdraft loans, according to the plaintiff and the defendant that the deductive account. Every day of the month. Overdraft and loan agreement. Shall be dissolved on December 31, 2537 to the end on April 7, 2538, the expiration time of the plaintiff. Notice to the defendant as a loan, so from January 1, 2538 the plaintiff shall have no right to charge interest from the defendants. The Appeal Court reduced the amount of capital is lower than that. Court decision on the Appeal Court judges as a result of the time. Plaintiff's interest would be shorter than that. The court ruled. The court ruled that the interest charged by the like. The problems with public order, the defendants either did not appeal the Court of Appeal has the power to judge the defendant No. 2 is involved in this case, only a transfer of land and buildings of the defendant, one in which the defendant is a registered. mortgaged to the plaintiff and the plaintiff would love to. To receive payment of the mortgaged property before creditors in the ordinary room to examine the ownership of the property will be transferred to Third party or not. The two defendants must be given to the rights and obligations of the plaintiff and defendant, a rest. The mortgage on the property as an assignee of the mortgage assets, even later, only two defendants entered the mortgage agreement. The third one is guaranteed a 56,000 baht to mortgage debt totaling U.S. $ 1.7 million, it is registered. The amount of mortgage debt as collateral to raise The defense has accused the two parties act as stakeholders. The transfer of property which is mortgaged. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 746 allows the mortgage. Mortgage on the property, which is only 56,000 baht for the second defendant is liable to the debtor or the debtor to the defendant to a mortgage. In all the mortgage debt. Even though mortgage money saved up for the third time. Are labeled. Conditions and other agreements to be based on the original mortgage contract in all respects. It's not the defendant. 2 shall be liable for the debt amount. If the mortgage has been paid. I do not pay as stated in the memorandum to the mortgage agreement that the mortgagor made a defendant to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 5328/2542.
The land as collateral, and the book to the end of the mortgage insurance is stated expressly that the defendant in two mortgages of land to the plaintiff as collateral for a debt of loans and other liabilities which had 2 and the fact that one exists for the plaintiff as well. the time of the contract and the future of the two defendants as the property is insured by mortgage insurance contract between plaintiff and defendant No. 2 to revoke or change any guarantees, however.
The second plaintiff and the defendant made an agreement to suspend mortgage (mortgage release) stated clearly that the two sides agreed to a land from mortgage to mortgage. Apply for a permit to land, and that the plaintiff did not receive payment from the defendant's liability to the defendant, 2 2, so the plaintiff still has under the existing contract and land as collateral. Letter to the mortgage contract as security. The agreement will also release the mortgage. I have only the plaintiff can not force a settlement of the land mortgaged as security for the two defendants only. The obligation to ensure that the two defendants, and that one still exists, which is one of the two defendants to be bound to pay to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 177/2521.
The mortgage payment mortgage and the mortgagee is required under the deed is not registered. To redeem and restore the land to the mortgagee is not a mortgage lender owned. The others in the other creditors. Do not make a right. Withhold the mortgage deed was filed for the compulsory registration of mortgage and redemption. The title fee.
