Section 674 The Woodlands, hotel or office. Or such other place as such. Shall be liable for any loss or damage caused to any property where people live, travel or if you bring a guest.
Section 675 shall be liable for the office of the travelers or guests, residents, property loss or damage to any loss or damage that even that will happen because people come out at the hotel or a place like that. Would be liable.
This liability. The bill, bills, bonds, gold and silver thread debenture stock certificates, jewelry or other valuables. Be limited to five thousand baht. Unless the deposit is like unto this office and was told the cost of the manifest.
The Department shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the act or condition of the property. Or the fault of the people who live, travel or hotel itself. Or his family. Or where he was welcomed.
Section 676 property, which does not explicitly tell them to leave. When exposed to loss or damage up Travelers or visitors to the bureau shall report it to the hotel, the Hotel or the place immediately. Otherwise, that office would you like from liability provided for in Section 674 and 675.
Section 677 is to inform the hotel in Bangkok or other places such as this. As the exclusion or limitation of liability of his office soon. He that is void. Travelers or guests unless they have agreed with the manifest in the exclusion or limitation of liability is just that.
Section 678 in the liability for compensation for property of a guest's arrival or loss of or damage to their homes. You shall not be filed after the expiration of six months from the date of arrival or guests who live out of that place.
To live and the other is made for travelers or guests, as he should live like that. The reimbursement will be replaced with.
The Department will withhold the property at public auction and deduct such amount of money owed to them as well as court fees and costs in the auction, the proceeds from the sale of any property. He shall exercise his office until just this once.
(1) fall to their property as long as six weeks, has not yet been received, and liabilities.
(2) at least one month before the auction. Their ad in the local newspaper a notice of intention to sell the property. Descriptors of the property to be sold short. If the owner knows me well.
At public auction after such a debt. The remaining money must be refunded to the owner or depositing the amount of the deposit at the office of property under the provisions of Section 331 and 333.
Supreme Court to 824/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant's claim of a debt by the plaintiff s car insurance can be taken from the B car owners to park in the area of a defendant to stay in a hotel.The plaintiff claimed that Employee or agent of a defendant to ignore their duties under the contract and the plaintiff's request to return the car, but it is a liability to the defendant at his office in the hotel only. Is not the case in the violation of the age of 1 year when the car lost up to August 2, 2540 the plaintiff received the right of the insured under Section 880 were filed for the compensation for the loss of the vehicle that the plaintiff-insurance from the defendants 1. On August 3, 2541 after the expiration of six months from the date of August 2, 2540, the date of the S out of the hotel and then terminate the first defendant.
Supreme Court in 9284/2544.
The hotel, which is not the defendant's actions directly caused by negligence. The plaintiff's property loss. Not act against the plaintiff. Defendant is liable only to the Civil and Commercial Code defines the specific algorithm for The Department of Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674 675 Hotels and 676 only.
The plaintiff's property is lost. Gold diamond watch, gold neck chain. Medal was multiplied by the gold surrounding the diamond's crown inlays, gold earrings diamond brooch, diamonds and cash, such property is associated with the gold seal of banknotes, jewelry and other valuables, which according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 675, paragraph two, the limitation of liability only. 500 unless the deposit is like unto this office and was told the cost of it. The plaintiff relies on guests who travel or do not leave valuables, the defendant was liable for only 500 baht, it is worth the trip to wear it openly or not. And yes, that must leave the property, only registered guests in the hotel.
Supreme Court in 7790/2544.
The defendant and the defendant's hotel room and parking in the parking lot for the drive to hotel guests, the defendant has a legitimate right to bring a car. I parked in the parking area, which is the responsibility of the defendant. The announcement that the defendant not responsible for any loss of property does not appear that he was agreed with the explicit exclusion of liability in accordance with the notification. With the exception of the case do not have liability under Section 677.
Lock the car doors from closing because a central log. Which constitutes the negligence causing the car was not lost. If not, with the exception of liability under Section 675, paragraph three.
The Office of the liability of the assets of the trip. The loss is limited to only five hundred baht, according to Section 675 paragraph two of the valuable property that has an effect similar to Egintagtra notes, bills, bonds or certificates of debenture Pratwnsincga other precious gems are just a car. property across the plain to even the odds are quite high, it's not a character of its value, according to Section 675 paragraph two.
Supreme Court in 9437/2542.
The word "precious" within the meaning of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 675, paragraph two is a valuable asset which has effects similar to Egintagtra. Notes or bills of the plaintiff's car, motorcycle and mobile phone is the only property to be used as normal, despite the relatively high price is not as valuable as such laws.
Supreme Court in 5005/2540.
Car accident at the park in the parking area of the defendant and the vehicle. Has disappeared. The defendant was liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674, although this will not let your employees know that the defendant had parked his car in an accident. The hotel's parking area, but it was unclear whether the defendant's car was missing for me. Was. General Manager of the hotel had immediately reported to the officer at the time. Case held that the defendant notify the hotel as soon as his office. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 676, then the limitation of liability of the defendant according to the document, which is just a fill in the name of the hotel and in the end she has typed it. "We will not be responsible for the property. What is the value or denomination. That are likely to be lost "as excluding the liability of the defendant. These documents make up one of the defendants. And did not appear to have agreed with most manifest in the exclusion or limitation of liability of such defendants. The text in this document is null and void. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 677 had still not released from liability.
Supreme Court in 5539/2537.
According to the charges and claims on residents of the charges and the request is mandatory. The plaintiff sued the defendant, the defendant was liable for compensation by value. A debt due from the slot. The insured has automobile insurance that the defendant intended to park in the area of The hotel, which he accused the defendant is liable for loss or Any damage. However, due to the property. If residents or guests who traveled took over the age of this product claim compensation in such cases under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 678 and 6 months of age who travel or live away from that place. When the plaintiff's automobile insurance loss occurred on March 12, 2527, after the incident channel. To inform the officer then returned to Bangkok the same day. Subrogation of the insured plaintiff under section 880 and filed a claim for loss of plaintiff's vehicle. Insurance from the defendant on October 10, 2527 over a period of six months. To terminate the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court in 2322/2537.
The hotel's Office. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674 675 refers to the owner of the hotel business. Owner to keep the interest income from hotel operations. Find the right person to control and manage the hotel, which is not. Plaintiff to stay in one of the defendants on the plaintiff to the car park at the hotel's parking ramp is missing. The plaintiff notified the hotel manager immediately. Known events. It can be considered. The plaintiff informed the Bureau that the car has been lost to you as soon as the defendant, a hotel, it is claimed that he found no relief from liability.
Supreme Court to 727/2536.
Plaintiff, the defendant rented a hotel room and car park on the street in front of the hotel. Hotel staff told to park. The hotel car park is full. When the plaintiff's car is missing. The Department requires the defendant's liability to the plaintiff. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674.
Supreme Court in 3902/2534.
Plaintiffs claim that the insurer has been sued over the rights of the defendant's insurer. By bringing the contract to serve as proof of the insured as a participant Interest in the insurance case. Does not attest to enforce the contract. The contract has not listened to stamp duty. Defendant's business guests the hotel has rules that need to inform the defendant that. The car was parked in the parking lot to provide employees with care. Otherwise, if the defendant is not liable for damage or loss that Rama was staying in a hotel by the defendant's car parked in the parking lot of defendant. But do not let the defendant know that Rama did not agree with the manifest in the exclusion or limitation of liability of the defendant. Such regulation is void. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 677 to reject the defendant was not liable. When the car. R. disappeared from the parking lot of the defendant. Informed the general manager of Sun, which is unknown, but the defendant denied liability for the May Thi told the defendant can be considered known. When the plaintiff's insurer to pay the beneficiary to the contract. Insurance and Subrogation of the defendant's claim that this The plaintiff sued the defendant without prior notice.
Supreme Court in 3024/2533.
The plaintiff sued the defendant's liability as an office attached to the hotel by car to the leasing contract lawsuit. Despite the signature of the leasing contract does not make the lawsuit go. There is no law that must contract with a lawsuit. Moreover, it is considered that the contract made by the plaintiff, like it or not. Must attest in the S. permission to operate a hotel with the defendant's office hotel When it appears that the plaintiff's stay at the hotel by a car parked in the hotel parking lot and then disappear. The hotel, a defendant who is liable to the plaintiff. Shall not be claimed as a representative of the defendant is S. not be liable for damages to the plaintiff's car lost a motor car, which must not be trading as usual at the time of loss. This case the plaintiff had disputes with car leasing. The lease, plus interest on the price. The prices quoted above normal. Loss of interest is treated as a personal obligation of the lease. The defendant is not liable for reimbursement of the interest.
Section 675 shall be liable for the office of the travelers or guests, residents, property loss or damage to any loss or damage that even that will happen because people come out at the hotel or a place like that. Would be liable.
This liability. The bill, bills, bonds, gold and silver thread debenture stock certificates, jewelry or other valuables. Be limited to five thousand baht. Unless the deposit is like unto this office and was told the cost of the manifest.
The Department shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the act or condition of the property. Or the fault of the people who live, travel or hotel itself. Or his family. Or where he was welcomed.
Section 676 property, which does not explicitly tell them to leave. When exposed to loss or damage up Travelers or visitors to the bureau shall report it to the hotel, the Hotel or the place immediately. Otherwise, that office would you like from liability provided for in Section 674 and 675.
Section 677 is to inform the hotel in Bangkok or other places such as this. As the exclusion or limitation of liability of his office soon. He that is void. Travelers or guests unless they have agreed with the manifest in the exclusion or limitation of liability is just that.
Section 678 in the liability for compensation for property of a guest's arrival or loss of or damage to their homes. You shall not be filed after the expiration of six months from the date of arrival or guests who live out of that place.
To live and the other is made for travelers or guests, as he should live like that. The reimbursement will be replaced with.
The Department will withhold the property at public auction and deduct such amount of money owed to them as well as court fees and costs in the auction, the proceeds from the sale of any property. He shall exercise his office until just this once.
(1) fall to their property as long as six weeks, has not yet been received, and liabilities.
(2) at least one month before the auction. Their ad in the local newspaper a notice of intention to sell the property. Descriptors of the property to be sold short. If the owner knows me well.
At public auction after such a debt. The remaining money must be refunded to the owner or depositing the amount of the deposit at the office of property under the provisions of Section 331 and 333.
Supreme Court to 824/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant's claim of a debt by the plaintiff s car insurance can be taken from the B car owners to park in the area of a defendant to stay in a hotel.The plaintiff claimed that Employee or agent of a defendant to ignore their duties under the contract and the plaintiff's request to return the car, but it is a liability to the defendant at his office in the hotel only. Is not the case in the violation of the age of 1 year when the car lost up to August 2, 2540 the plaintiff received the right of the insured under Section 880 were filed for the compensation for the loss of the vehicle that the plaintiff-insurance from the defendants 1. On August 3, 2541 after the expiration of six months from the date of August 2, 2540, the date of the S out of the hotel and then terminate the first defendant.
Supreme Court in 9284/2544.
The hotel, which is not the defendant's actions directly caused by negligence. The plaintiff's property loss. Not act against the plaintiff. Defendant is liable only to the Civil and Commercial Code defines the specific algorithm for The Department of Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674 675 Hotels and 676 only.
The plaintiff's property is lost. Gold diamond watch, gold neck chain. Medal was multiplied by the gold surrounding the diamond's crown inlays, gold earrings diamond brooch, diamonds and cash, such property is associated with the gold seal of banknotes, jewelry and other valuables, which according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 675, paragraph two, the limitation of liability only. 500 unless the deposit is like unto this office and was told the cost of it. The plaintiff relies on guests who travel or do not leave valuables, the defendant was liable for only 500 baht, it is worth the trip to wear it openly or not. And yes, that must leave the property, only registered guests in the hotel.
Supreme Court in 7790/2544.
The defendant and the defendant's hotel room and parking in the parking lot for the drive to hotel guests, the defendant has a legitimate right to bring a car. I parked in the parking area, which is the responsibility of the defendant. The announcement that the defendant not responsible for any loss of property does not appear that he was agreed with the explicit exclusion of liability in accordance with the notification. With the exception of the case do not have liability under Section 677.
Lock the car doors from closing because a central log. Which constitutes the negligence causing the car was not lost. If not, with the exception of liability under Section 675, paragraph three.
The Office of the liability of the assets of the trip. The loss is limited to only five hundred baht, according to Section 675 paragraph two of the valuable property that has an effect similar to Egintagtra notes, bills, bonds or certificates of debenture Pratwnsincga other precious gems are just a car. property across the plain to even the odds are quite high, it's not a character of its value, according to Section 675 paragraph two.
Supreme Court in 9437/2542.
The word "precious" within the meaning of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 675, paragraph two is a valuable asset which has effects similar to Egintagtra. Notes or bills of the plaintiff's car, motorcycle and mobile phone is the only property to be used as normal, despite the relatively high price is not as valuable as such laws.
Supreme Court in 5005/2540.
Car accident at the park in the parking area of the defendant and the vehicle. Has disappeared. The defendant was liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674, although this will not let your employees know that the defendant had parked his car in an accident. The hotel's parking area, but it was unclear whether the defendant's car was missing for me. Was. General Manager of the hotel had immediately reported to the officer at the time. Case held that the defendant notify the hotel as soon as his office. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 676, then the limitation of liability of the defendant according to the document, which is just a fill in the name of the hotel and in the end she has typed it. "We will not be responsible for the property. What is the value or denomination. That are likely to be lost "as excluding the liability of the defendant. These documents make up one of the defendants. And did not appear to have agreed with most manifest in the exclusion or limitation of liability of such defendants. The text in this document is null and void. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 677 had still not released from liability.
Supreme Court in 5539/2537.
According to the charges and claims on residents of the charges and the request is mandatory. The plaintiff sued the defendant, the defendant was liable for compensation by value. A debt due from the slot. The insured has automobile insurance that the defendant intended to park in the area of The hotel, which he accused the defendant is liable for loss or Any damage. However, due to the property. If residents or guests who traveled took over the age of this product claim compensation in such cases under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 678 and 6 months of age who travel or live away from that place. When the plaintiff's automobile insurance loss occurred on March 12, 2527, after the incident channel. To inform the officer then returned to Bangkok the same day. Subrogation of the insured plaintiff under section 880 and filed a claim for loss of plaintiff's vehicle. Insurance from the defendant on October 10, 2527 over a period of six months. To terminate the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court in 2322/2537.
The hotel's Office. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674 675 refers to the owner of the hotel business. Owner to keep the interest income from hotel operations. Find the right person to control and manage the hotel, which is not. Plaintiff to stay in one of the defendants on the plaintiff to the car park at the hotel's parking ramp is missing. The plaintiff notified the hotel manager immediately. Known events. It can be considered. The plaintiff informed the Bureau that the car has been lost to you as soon as the defendant, a hotel, it is claimed that he found no relief from liability.
Supreme Court to 727/2536.
Plaintiff, the defendant rented a hotel room and car park on the street in front of the hotel. Hotel staff told to park. The hotel car park is full. When the plaintiff's car is missing. The Department requires the defendant's liability to the plaintiff. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 674.
Supreme Court in 3902/2534.
Plaintiffs claim that the insurer has been sued over the rights of the defendant's insurer. By bringing the contract to serve as proof of the insured as a participant Interest in the insurance case. Does not attest to enforce the contract. The contract has not listened to stamp duty. Defendant's business guests the hotel has rules that need to inform the defendant that. The car was parked in the parking lot to provide employees with care. Otherwise, if the defendant is not liable for damage or loss that Rama was staying in a hotel by the defendant's car parked in the parking lot of defendant. But do not let the defendant know that Rama did not agree with the manifest in the exclusion or limitation of liability of the defendant. Such regulation is void. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 677 to reject the defendant was not liable. When the car. R. disappeared from the parking lot of the defendant. Informed the general manager of Sun, which is unknown, but the defendant denied liability for the May Thi told the defendant can be considered known. When the plaintiff's insurer to pay the beneficiary to the contract. Insurance and Subrogation of the defendant's claim that this The plaintiff sued the defendant without prior notice.
Supreme Court in 3024/2533.
The plaintiff sued the defendant's liability as an office attached to the hotel by car to the leasing contract lawsuit. Despite the signature of the leasing contract does not make the lawsuit go. There is no law that must contract with a lawsuit. Moreover, it is considered that the contract made by the plaintiff, like it or not. Must attest in the S. permission to operate a hotel with the defendant's office hotel When it appears that the plaintiff's stay at the hotel by a car parked in the hotel parking lot and then disappear. The hotel, a defendant who is liable to the plaintiff. Shall not be claimed as a representative of the defendant is S. not be liable for damages to the plaintiff's car lost a motor car, which must not be trading as usual at the time of loss. This case the plaintiff had disputes with car leasing. The lease, plus interest on the price. The prices quoted above normal. Loss of interest is treated as a personal obligation of the lease. The defendant is not liable for reimbursement of the interest.
