Section 587 of the outsourcing contract to which a person is hired. Agreed to complete one task to another person. The employer. The employer agrees to pay to the achievement of doing it.
Section 588 and other tools for the successful work of the contractor to provide.
Section 589 if the luggage for the work that the contractor provides. You need a good supply.
Section 590 if the employer provides room yet. The contractor will take the luggage with caution and not to waste and waste When the task successfully. The remaining items will be returned to the employer.
Section 591 if the defect or delay in doing that, because of the baggage that a good employer. The statement from the employer. He said the contractor is not liable unless they already know the baggage that is not suitable or that the statement is incorrect and does not notice warned.
Section 592 requires the contractor to allow the employer or employer's representative to inspect, at any time to do it.
Section 593 if the contractor did not begin in a reasonable time. Violation of the contract or to delay it. Without any delay or fault of the employer. It may be anticipated in advance that it will not be achieved within the agreed upon it. Employers prefer to lose the contract. In all that time waiting for the delivery of that.
Section 594 If, during the time of such a nature that would be predicted in advance. How do they succeed or fail in a way that violates the agreement, it soon becomes the fault of the contractor. The employer will notify the contractor to fix the bug to reconcile. Or according to the contract within a reasonable time, under which the notice of the time. If and to elude them. He said employers would prefer to have it repaired or to a third party contractor, which will be vulnerable to damage and total cost.
Section 595 if the contract provides baggage gem. The liability of the contractor for the defect. You may be required by the provisions of this Code. The transaction.
Section 596 if the late delivery of services as set forth in the contract or if it is not scheduled in the contract on the grounds that it Lewgpgn time. Employers prefer to pay lower down. If the essence of the contract at the time. I would like to terminate the agreement.
Section 597 provides that if an employer admits that it was not reluctant to say or do anything Contractor is not liable for the delivery delay.
Section 598 provides that if the employer accepts it, then the defect is not clearly expressed or implied by Reluctant to say or do anything. Contractors were not liable. Unless the defect is such that it will not be found on the receipt or contractor to obscure it.
Section 599 of the delivery delay to it. The delivery of the defects I found in an employer to withhold pay from them. Contractor shall provide reasonable assurance.
Section 600 if not specified otherwise in your contract, remember that the contractor will be responsible for the defect. But that occurred within one year from the date of delivery. Or that occurred within five years. If that is the building to the ground. The house is made of wood plants.
However, this restriction shall not apply if it appears that the contractor has to cover the defect.
Section 601 are permitted to sue the contractor after one year. From the date the defect to appear.
Section 602 of the remuneration shall be used when authorized to do so.
If that is scheduled to be delivered to a specified number of parts and pay as soon as I said to him, shall be used to pay each time to remove them.
Section 603 if the contract provides baggage. And hired to do the erosion or damage to be handed down before idols. You ruined that I went to fold it to the employer. If it is not ruined because of the actions of contractors.
In this case. Remuneration, it shall not be used.
Section 604 If an employer provides baggage. And hired to do the erosion or damage to be handed down before idols. You ruined it went public that its clients. If it is not ruined because of the actions of contractors.
In this case. Remuneration, it shall not be used. Destroyed unless it is because of the actions of the employer.
Section 605 if the employees do not live as long as they are completed. The employer may terminate the contract. When the compensation to the contractor for any damage caused by the termination of the contract.
Section 606 is the essence of the contract is the ability of the male labor contractors and death. Or become unable to contract further with it, not because of their offense. He said the contract would be the end.
And made a part of it is useful to remember you as the employer, the employer must accept it and pay the appropriate section.
Section 607 of the outsourcing contract is wholly or partly divided into sub-contractors to do a fried one. The essence of the contract unless it is in the ability of male employment. The contractor will be liable to any behavior or any of the subcontractors.
Supreme Court in 5737/2552.
The contract will contain the details of a garment products for delivery of the package and stated that the defendant, a plaintiff is a seller and a buyer. The contract is subject to textile materials, production processes and packaging materials for sewing and second place. The product must be tested by the factory and the defendant is a set of equipment and materials used in production must be approved by a defendant before and before production. The plaintiff is required to submit samples to the defendant to make an approval and testing before If the test fails, a defendant has the right to cancel the order. The dispute is a contract that requires the plaintiff to produce garments for the defendants 1, fabric and supplies all the required testing and approval by the defendant that one before the defendant first must send a prototype to provide. Plaintiffs try to set an example for size. The contract dispute is not a garment made by the plaintiff. Product already. The plaintiff, a plaintiff can produce by their own ideas. The plaintiff hired the defendant to a garment by sewing a fabric material. And manufacturing processes are in control of a defendant in Civil and Commercial Code provisions of Chapter 7 of Title 3 of the employment of
Supreme Court in 3660/2551.
That the contract is a contract between the parties as may be agreed upon terms or conditions, the process of debt settlement do it. When the two are not the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff that one must pay to the plaintiff when the plaintiff that the work done that is, when the case is final.
Both plaintiff and defendant agree that the terms of payment of wages as the other. That plaintiff made any steps to work. Both defendants must pay the amount to the plaintiff. Or when the case is decisive in the early stages. The two defendants that the plaintiff must pay the amount. Which agreed to pay as a result of their work. The plaintiff, the defendant must both agree that hiring is based on the completion of the work that was important. Regardless of the work to be done at any stage when any plaintiff by the defendant and the prosecution of the defendant, both parties entered into a compromise with them. And was sentenced by the Court allowed an appeal by either party to the lawsuit. It held that the plaintiff has been employed successfully by the agreement.
Supreme Court to 10707/2550.
The problem is that the contract is an agreement that aims to take a share of the property that is the case they will receive from the clients, contrary to ordre public and morality of the void or not. The problem with the filing of the plaintiff. The law relating to public order, the defendant has the right to raise in the court admonish the P.wi.p. Section 249 paragraph two.
According to the rules in the contract that the plaintiff, defendant, attorneys' fees are calculated. The defendant must pay attorney's fees to the plaintiff as a result of the Supreme Court. It appears that if the Supreme Court ruled that the defendants won the case. It is simply that the defendant did not have to break the land to the beach. Only such land remain the property of the defendant as the original. The defendant obtained the property from the party not prevailing. The fees charged by the Supreme Court, which ruled that the defendants won the case. We will not charge attorneys a share of the property that the defendant will get out of it. The contract is not contrary to public order or good morals of the people.
That the contract is a contract made under Section 587 of the completion of the work is important, and the payment of remuneration to equate the success of the work or pay the agreed remuneration. Despite the fall in the rate of wages that would have made such an agreement contrary to public order and morality of the public. The agreement was effective. That the plaintiff would like to receive the full amount.
Supreme Court in 4308/2550.
Litigation, the contractor responsible for the defect and the age of 1 year under Section 601 shall not apply to cases arising under Section 600 is not the case. otherwise specified in the contract. The work of the defect after delivery. However, according to the complaint, the plaintiff sued under an agreement under which the liability for defects that do otherwise. The terms agreed as part separately. The parties are bound to follow. Yes, it is not just an agreement to change the schedule which the contractor is liable for defects that make them different from those set forth in Section 600, not when there is no specific law on the statute. Be used to determine the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 6314/2550.
The plaintiff worked for the defect is not required by the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant was negligent before the plaintiff can not fix it. The plaintiff is at fault. The plaintiff has no right to terminate the contract and claim damages from the defendants. However. Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is deemed to be terminated by default. Construction contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is a contract made under Section 587, while a reciprocal agreement. When the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant terminated the plaintiff and the defendant must go to the other party to return to its status as a Section 391 paragraph one, but because the plaintiff to the defendant completed the second installment. unable to return to the status of existing ones. The defendant shall be governed by Section 391 requires the construction of the second installment payment to the plaintiff instead. The defendant has no right to suspend payment of wages as a whole. When the plaintiff and the defendant had notice of the defect, the plaintiff's failure to comply with an agreement to fix things. But the plaintiff did not perform. She likes to be outsourced to correct the defect. The plaintiff is required to pay under Section 594 and the defendant was entitled to deduct the cost of lost wages of the second period only.
Because the plaintiff because the defendant's request to change a malfunction. The larger bedroom. The materials of the plan. Weight than steel, making it bend. The defendant shall participate in any such defect. And it appears that the defendant did not hire anyone to fix the flaws. Court has determined the cost of hiring a third party to fix the defects as appropriate.
Supreme Court in 5201/2549.
Defendant, a contractor who built the building. In this order the defendant to a zinc roof of the plaintiff and the plaintiff's hiring hall. If they fall within the provisions of Section 193 / 34 (1) at the end. Unless it is made to the affairs of the debtor itself. The age of the claims of the plaintiff is a five-year period from the due date for payment the defendant has not filed a default until the expiration of five years, so it does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
The plaintiff delivered the defendant to a building roof and the roof leaks when it rains and when the wind hit. The defect is not found in any given moment on. The defendant is liable to a plaintiff by the defendant in a Section 598 has already paid Sittiiึdhnewg only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff to the defendant that a repair is completed, it prefers to withhold pay for it.
Supreme Court in 4857/2549.
Contract, the plaintiff and the defendant's auto repair is one of the two-year contract made under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1).
The plaintiff delivered the repaired car to the car to repair it. The plaintiff may enforce their rights in order to call the defendant to pay a stipend from the date of delivery of each vehicle to the repair. The defendant to pay money to the plaintiff. It is a debt to the plaintiff. The age break down and start the trip from the new age. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) and Section 193/15.
Plaintiff's debt to 41 items totaling U.S. $ 402,197 which the plaintiff can enforce their rights from the date of May 8, 2541 was filed on June 19, 2543, more than two years against the plaintiff in this section is to expire. The car's debt to 11 of 47,500 baht, it appears that on May 8, 2543, the date of the defendant to pay some debts. Credit repair is all 11 to terminate the transaction. Age of the debt, they have to start counting. And calculated up to a maximum of 2 years against the plaintiff in the lawsuit, it does not terminate the 11 items.
The debt will cause the tripping time must be stopped before they terminate the debt. When the repairs were due to terminate the U.S. $ 402,197 since the date of May 8, 2541 to repay some of the defendants in those days there was no time to stop the disruption.
Supreme Court in 8141/2548.
The plaintiff's goods and the defects. She prefers to withhold and pay the price as payment has not been done because the circumstances in which one defendant, the debtor shall not be responsible. Assume that the defendant defaulted on the payment due date agreed upon in accordance with Section 205 is not the plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest. But when the court requires the defendant to pay this amount. The debt must be paid by the defendant's sentence and must pay interest from the date the plaintiff is entitled to receive from the date of the verdict, the Court of First Instance.
Supreme Court in 4022/2548.
When the plaintiff fails to construct the basement and underground water tanks under the building contract. All three defendants do not pay remuneration to the plaintiff in this section. But on the other. The plaintiff's construction of the second period and third period but not completed it already. The construction of the plaintiff had multiple defects. All three defendants to withhold pay from the 2nd and 3rd period until the plaintiff to repair the defect has been completed in accordance with Section 599 if the plaintiff fails to do so until all three defendants to terminate the contract. All three defendants prefer to deduct the cost of repairing the damage as it should be for them only. The remainder will be refunded to the plaintiff to pay. I like all three defendants will not be paid stipend if they could.
Supreme Court in 2765/2548.
The defendant's first husband had a second to sign as a witness in a contract for the plaintiff to build a house on the land of the defendant, both to stay together with the fact that two of the facts as I have also shown that during the construction of the defendant as well. the two also shared the view taken of the work. The plaintiff is ordered to correct deficiencies, and modification of the second defendant to sign a contract as a contract matter. But the circumstances of the hearing that the defendant is an accomplice and agree to be bound by the contract with the plaintiff. So the construction debt, the plaintiff shall have the authority to bind the defendant in a lawsuit against a defendant who is jointly liable with the defendant, 2.
Supreme Court in 1681 - 1683/2548.
The defendant hired a consultant. The three plaintiffs agreed to proceed with the modification of the apartment hotel. Provide the appropriate personnel working at the hotel. And marketing plan for hotel profits. It is the one that achieved by the defendant at first agreed to pay compensation in the results of work done per month 140,000 Baht a plaintiff to 3 working days are Monday through Friday from 8:30 am to 17:00 o'clock it. This is not working as a defendant to go to work, but it is also the place where the defendant is a provider of contract consultants. And the third defendant did not appear to be under the supervision of the defendant No. 1 and No. 2 is not a contract of employment but a contract made under Section 587.
Supreme Court in 3838/2547.
Defendant hired plaintiff commercial buildings on the land of the defendant. But construction is not completed within the Plaintiffs. The defendant entered the building and such. If a defendant does not take delivery of the defects as well as commercial buildings. Once the defendant is liable for defects in accordance with Section 598 of the Civil and Commercial Code a claim for breach of contract penalty shall be in accordance with Section 381, the defendant refused to live in commercial buildings. Plaintiffs hired construction. Hold that the defendants pay the debt. The defendant did not reserve the right to remove a defendant's penalty at the time of payment accepted. The defendant did not call for penalties under the contract.
Supreme Court in 7592/2547.
Contracts do not stamp duty under section 118 Income Tax I have not heard the evidence in the case, but do not have employment laws that must be in writing or evidenced in writing, to legal action on them. So instead of listening to witness testimony and documents
Supreme Court in 3194/2547.
Defendant's contract to the plaintiff to the defendant and the plaintiff's advertising products advertising products that will be accepted. When the defendant agreed to pay the advertising cost to the plaintiff. It is not the plaintiff, the defendant had the intent to transfer property to one of the defendants. And the defendant agreed to that price. Into a contract under the Civil and Commercial Code Book 3 1 with a sell. However, as the plaintiff contractor agreed to complete the product line to the defendant employer. And the defendant agreed to pay for advertising or pay for the completion of the work done. The characteristics of employment made in accordance with Section 587.
Supreme Court in 7172/2547.
Defects in accordance with Section 601 means a defect which occurs as defined in Section 598, 599 and 600, which refers to a defect in the property, the contractor delivered to the hirer in full. then. Not meant to be not practical to complete the contract. The defendant's testimony kite representing the plaintiff and the defendant was not home from work and reluctant to say or do anything The defendant is not liable to the plaintiff under Section 598 of the opinion that this case is the plaintiff alleged that the defendants breach the contract because it does not work properly. Find the right to sue the defendant liable for defects of the work done. The fact that the defendant is at fault because the contract had been authentic. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the proportion of defendants who have not completed under the contract.
Supreme Court in 1128 - 1129/2547.
Defendant's business travel arrangements to cruise travel.The cruise will be a time to the plaintiff's employment between the plaintiff and the defendant committed to the success of the work is important. Non-employment under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 575, but the employer shall do. 587 The plaintiff is not an employee of the defendant.
Supreme Court in 5203/2546.
The plaintiff delivered in land fills and areas that are not defendants. 1 will be granted or not. Not that the plaintiff delivered the defendant to pay a stipend to the plaintiff as soon as the delivery of the defects may be corrected first. The plaintiff may be entitled to claim from the date the defendant first received the application, the defendant, a sign notes the letter of the committee work on May 3, 2539, but it also claims the plaintiff to adjust. Road to be completed first. Show that given the defendant a day not earlier than May 3, 2539 plaintiff filed suit on April 24, 2541 was a period of two years from the date that the plaintiff could not terminate the enforcement of claim.
Supreme Court to 519/2545.
Defendant from the plaintiff to purchase and install a plastic sheet to lay waste water treatment of the defendant the plaintiff delivered a plastic sheet laid in the pond water that had already The defendant is treated waste water for about 2 to 3 months in plastic lined them up in the aneurysm without any defects found during the delivery. Plaintiff, the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the defendant Sittiiึdhnewg wages, but only to allow the plaintiff to repair these defects only. When the plaintiff contacted the defendant for repair several times. The defendant was not aware of the need to use the pond water. Can not pump out the pond because it will lose revenue. It is not in the nature of the plaintiff's claims, the only contractor that could do that alone. Thus, the plaintiff can not repair the defects of the work is not the fault of the plaintiff. Defendant does not pay the overdue Sittiiึdhnewg anymore.
Supreme Court in 8001/2544.
The plaintiff sued the defendants 1 to 4, as a design engineer who designed it breached the contract about the use of the water. And sued the defendant, a 3, 5 and 6, the engineers who work breached the contract does not determine the form and requirements of water and materials, surface traffic, the construction that can be used. or not. Cause more damage. The plaintiff's lawsuit was not filed claims for compensation for the defect. The age of 1 year under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 601 is liable to be sued for breach of contract, it is the design and supervision of the law, the absence of a specific age. It is generally the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 5229/2544.
Law Act 2528 and regulations regarding etiquette Law Lawyer Law in 2529 by the Commission by virtue of the Act shall come into force not provided. No lawyer is a lawyer by the division of property is not part of the settlement, which will include a client, the contract that specified that "Lawyers will be charged 20 percent of the total funds. When the court to pay attorney's fees. The court can only imagine some of the lawyers, some of which are legal. If the case is not the same lawyers charge 10 percent of the amount of compromise "is not contrary to law. The agreements provide that attorney's fees as a percentage of the funds. And if the court has only partially. Or compromise. Sets the rules for calculating attorney's fees. Are contrary to public order or morality of the public. That the contract is not void. And when none of that contract in the manner of luck. The agreement with the Adgesiikan uncertainty of future events based on a Tie. The contract effort must be made by lawyers and clients that are looking for a bet, according to Section 853 did not.
Supreme Court in 1469/2542.
Defects as defined in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 601 refers to a defect arising as defined in Section 598 599 and 600 is the first one to defect. The property where the contract was delivered to the employer under the contract, the plaintiff sued the defendant's breach of contract and complete the checks within the warehouse building supplies provided that they are termites or not. The defendant did not see the wood for the termites eat calico of the plaintiff, and pest control to put an end to no cigarettes whatever chemical prevents the termites spread all over the place under the terms of the contract to eliminate and prevent termites and the termite bites. calico I was still in a contract such as the plaintiff's complaint, the plaintiff sued the defendant is subject to a liability that is not practical to complete the contract. If not the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 601 as follows: when a defendant fails to complete the contract. Defendant is liable for damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff was calico bite termite damage to the plaintiff. Claims for damages, the law is not age specific. The 10-year time limit under the Civil and Commercial Code and Section 193/30 of the date the plaintiff discovered termite damage to the calico bite lawsuit. Case to the expiration of 10 years, so it does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court in 2031/2541.
The contract between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 and 2, there is agreement about the defects in the agreement that If the construction of the defendant that a contract is made and the defendant 2 is the design and control of the defect within 1 year from the date of delivery, and the plaintiff notified the defendants 1 and 2 repair, but the defendant's first and 2, not repair, modify or repair it. But not completely. The plaintiff has the right to hire others to replace and repair the defendants 1 and 2 will be responsible for the plaintiff to pay wages to the other. 1 and 2, when the defendant fails to comply with the agreement constitutes a breach of contract. Plaintiffs have sued under the contract. If it's not age, according to Section 600 and Section 601 shall not apply because the two provisions apply only if no agreement otherwise. In case this is not the case with the specific provisions of their age. General provisions must be age 10 years, according to Section 164 in force at the time the plaintiff may be entitled to claim shall apply.
Supreme Court in 6675/2541.
Contract that a contract made under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 587 as a result of the litigation or act lawyers to prepare cases, and that is a defense in court until the case is final and the payment of remuneration must be taken. The success of the work or pay remuneration in accordance with the agreed terms, even if the employer to pay remuneration to the full amount of the contract that the employer can terminate the contract in any class or any non-binding agreement to merge.minister of public good, such an agreement is not enforceable.
Supreme Court in 6135/2540.
Although the plaintiff to sue the employer is doing. The court agreed that plaintiff should have a value of the work has been done to the defendant. The court has the power to the plaintiff. Supreme Court ruling that the defendant hired the plaintiff 2996/2540 Construction of commercial buildings, 11 units have been constructed for a plaintiff to make a stop further. When the plaintiff left work. Defendant to inform the police as evidence. Specific intent that the plaintiff was involved in the construction of the next. And the defendant asked the workers if they can continue to work or not. Foreman of the plaintiff that it can continue to work even if the plaintiff does not have to continue to run until the defendant pays the wages for these workers. The plaintiff does not wish to work for the defendant by leaving a job. The defendant had no intent to contract work to another plaintiff. Construction contract between the plaintiff, defendant. Cease to do by default. After the defendant left the plaintiff, then other workers, about 80 people will work as an employee of the defendant as the plaintiff's workers to continue to do as an employee of the defendant. Not as an employee of the plaintiff. The defendant paid the plaintiff leave to workers after work to complete the claim for the payment of the plaintiff. The defendant can not be called up for labor in this part of the plaintiff by counterclaim.
Supreme Court in 2919/2540.
The deliverable is the controversial issue of wages. The plaintiff is not authorized by or reluctant to say or do anything And notes that a defendant delivered to plaintiff, stating that the penalty for a defendant to be deferred. Plaintiff reserves the right to claim further. It sounds like that. The plaintiff has the right to be so in debt. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation from the defendant, either. Sued by the plaintiff's claims based on a defendant charged with a crash bug. The plaintiff informed the defendant that a defendant, but he managed to repair a plaintiff does not need to hire a technician to come to a new defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the total amount of U.S. $ 67,650 which the defendant filed a compliance agreement. The age of 10 years under the Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 7406/2540.
The plaintiff hired the defendant to plead The success of the practice until the case is final. A lost or won as a result of work to pay the stipend only. The lawsuit, plaintiff hired the defendant admitted to the utmost. They have agreed to compromise and withdraw in a civil case filed in court. The court shall have power to determine the appropriate wage for the actions of the plaintiff. Employment contract that is made of a reciprocal agreement, both parties have paid the debt must be paid to each other. The difference in accounts receivable and accounts payable at the same time. When the plaintiff employee has worked for the employer, the defendant and the defendant received a benefit that is. The plaintiff shall be entitled to receive remuneration as a result of the actions. The agreement that "Whether the case is and how they are to the satisfaction of the defendant" is not only a great deal about the outcome or end result of the transactions. Not according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 144 (unchanged) Section 182 (new) that the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is not void.
Supreme Court in 6144/2539.
Civil and commercial trading of the contract made with the aim to transfer a property transaction. The contract to do the work and achievements of the work is important. The work done on the subject of a Section 592 defines the duties of the contractor that the contractor must allow the employer or employer's representative to inspect, at any time, and Section 605 defines the rights of the employer. If the work is not completed, as long as you do. The employer may terminate the agreement on the compensation to the contractor for any damages arising out of contract case, but the contact between the plaintiff and defendant in the weaving of any agreement in writing. It therefore ordered the defendant to the plaintiff verbally woven fabric according to the pattern set by the number of defendants accused of the course. Terms of delivery and payment of a fabric in accordance with that stated in the contract and to Weaver as a defendant. Plaintiffs will prompt others to be woven. During which the defendant did not have the control, monitoring, fabric, weaving and textiles will be eliminated. The legal relationship between plaintiff and defendant that a contract is movable. The defendant ordered the plaintiff to a cloth several times. Order fabric in which the price exceeds 500 and does not have a book signed by the person liable or have a routine or have been paying some of the plaintiff to sue them in court for the defendant: 1. The fabrics are woven in the order are not.
Section 588 and other tools for the successful work of the contractor to provide.
Section 589 if the luggage for the work that the contractor provides. You need a good supply.
Section 590 if the employer provides room yet. The contractor will take the luggage with caution and not to waste and waste When the task successfully. The remaining items will be returned to the employer.
Section 591 if the defect or delay in doing that, because of the baggage that a good employer. The statement from the employer. He said the contractor is not liable unless they already know the baggage that is not suitable or that the statement is incorrect and does not notice warned.
Section 592 requires the contractor to allow the employer or employer's representative to inspect, at any time to do it.
Section 593 if the contractor did not begin in a reasonable time. Violation of the contract or to delay it. Without any delay or fault of the employer. It may be anticipated in advance that it will not be achieved within the agreed upon it. Employers prefer to lose the contract. In all that time waiting for the delivery of that.
Section 594 If, during the time of such a nature that would be predicted in advance. How do they succeed or fail in a way that violates the agreement, it soon becomes the fault of the contractor. The employer will notify the contractor to fix the bug to reconcile. Or according to the contract within a reasonable time, under which the notice of the time. If and to elude them. He said employers would prefer to have it repaired or to a third party contractor, which will be vulnerable to damage and total cost.
Section 595 if the contract provides baggage gem. The liability of the contractor for the defect. You may be required by the provisions of this Code. The transaction.
Section 596 if the late delivery of services as set forth in the contract or if it is not scheduled in the contract on the grounds that it Lewgpgn time. Employers prefer to pay lower down. If the essence of the contract at the time. I would like to terminate the agreement.
Section 597 provides that if an employer admits that it was not reluctant to say or do anything Contractor is not liable for the delivery delay.
Section 598 provides that if the employer accepts it, then the defect is not clearly expressed or implied by Reluctant to say or do anything. Contractors were not liable. Unless the defect is such that it will not be found on the receipt or contractor to obscure it.
Section 599 of the delivery delay to it. The delivery of the defects I found in an employer to withhold pay from them. Contractor shall provide reasonable assurance.
Section 600 if not specified otherwise in your contract, remember that the contractor will be responsible for the defect. But that occurred within one year from the date of delivery. Or that occurred within five years. If that is the building to the ground. The house is made of wood plants.
However, this restriction shall not apply if it appears that the contractor has to cover the defect.
Section 601 are permitted to sue the contractor after one year. From the date the defect to appear.
Section 602 of the remuneration shall be used when authorized to do so.
If that is scheduled to be delivered to a specified number of parts and pay as soon as I said to him, shall be used to pay each time to remove them.
Section 603 if the contract provides baggage. And hired to do the erosion or damage to be handed down before idols. You ruined that I went to fold it to the employer. If it is not ruined because of the actions of contractors.
In this case. Remuneration, it shall not be used.
Section 604 If an employer provides baggage. And hired to do the erosion or damage to be handed down before idols. You ruined it went public that its clients. If it is not ruined because of the actions of contractors.
In this case. Remuneration, it shall not be used. Destroyed unless it is because of the actions of the employer.
Section 605 if the employees do not live as long as they are completed. The employer may terminate the contract. When the compensation to the contractor for any damage caused by the termination of the contract.
Section 606 is the essence of the contract is the ability of the male labor contractors and death. Or become unable to contract further with it, not because of their offense. He said the contract would be the end.
And made a part of it is useful to remember you as the employer, the employer must accept it and pay the appropriate section.
Section 607 of the outsourcing contract is wholly or partly divided into sub-contractors to do a fried one. The essence of the contract unless it is in the ability of male employment. The contractor will be liable to any behavior or any of the subcontractors.
Supreme Court in 5737/2552.
The contract will contain the details of a garment products for delivery of the package and stated that the defendant, a plaintiff is a seller and a buyer. The contract is subject to textile materials, production processes and packaging materials for sewing and second place. The product must be tested by the factory and the defendant is a set of equipment and materials used in production must be approved by a defendant before and before production. The plaintiff is required to submit samples to the defendant to make an approval and testing before If the test fails, a defendant has the right to cancel the order. The dispute is a contract that requires the plaintiff to produce garments for the defendants 1, fabric and supplies all the required testing and approval by the defendant that one before the defendant first must send a prototype to provide. Plaintiffs try to set an example for size. The contract dispute is not a garment made by the plaintiff. Product already. The plaintiff, a plaintiff can produce by their own ideas. The plaintiff hired the defendant to a garment by sewing a fabric material. And manufacturing processes are in control of a defendant in Civil and Commercial Code provisions of Chapter 7 of Title 3 of the employment of
Supreme Court in 3660/2551.
That the contract is a contract between the parties as may be agreed upon terms or conditions, the process of debt settlement do it. When the two are not the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff that one must pay to the plaintiff when the plaintiff that the work done that is, when the case is final.
Both plaintiff and defendant agree that the terms of payment of wages as the other. That plaintiff made any steps to work. Both defendants must pay the amount to the plaintiff. Or when the case is decisive in the early stages. The two defendants that the plaintiff must pay the amount. Which agreed to pay as a result of their work. The plaintiff, the defendant must both agree that hiring is based on the completion of the work that was important. Regardless of the work to be done at any stage when any plaintiff by the defendant and the prosecution of the defendant, both parties entered into a compromise with them. And was sentenced by the Court allowed an appeal by either party to the lawsuit. It held that the plaintiff has been employed successfully by the agreement.
Supreme Court to 10707/2550.
The problem is that the contract is an agreement that aims to take a share of the property that is the case they will receive from the clients, contrary to ordre public and morality of the void or not. The problem with the filing of the plaintiff. The law relating to public order, the defendant has the right to raise in the court admonish the P.wi.p. Section 249 paragraph two.
According to the rules in the contract that the plaintiff, defendant, attorneys' fees are calculated. The defendant must pay attorney's fees to the plaintiff as a result of the Supreme Court. It appears that if the Supreme Court ruled that the defendants won the case. It is simply that the defendant did not have to break the land to the beach. Only such land remain the property of the defendant as the original. The defendant obtained the property from the party not prevailing. The fees charged by the Supreme Court, which ruled that the defendants won the case. We will not charge attorneys a share of the property that the defendant will get out of it. The contract is not contrary to public order or good morals of the people.
That the contract is a contract made under Section 587 of the completion of the work is important, and the payment of remuneration to equate the success of the work or pay the agreed remuneration. Despite the fall in the rate of wages that would have made such an agreement contrary to public order and morality of the public. The agreement was effective. That the plaintiff would like to receive the full amount.
Supreme Court in 4308/2550.
Litigation, the contractor responsible for the defect and the age of 1 year under Section 601 shall not apply to cases arising under Section 600 is not the case. otherwise specified in the contract. The work of the defect after delivery. However, according to the complaint, the plaintiff sued under an agreement under which the liability for defects that do otherwise. The terms agreed as part separately. The parties are bound to follow. Yes, it is not just an agreement to change the schedule which the contractor is liable for defects that make them different from those set forth in Section 600, not when there is no specific law on the statute. Be used to determine the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 6314/2550.
The plaintiff worked for the defect is not required by the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant was negligent before the plaintiff can not fix it. The plaintiff is at fault. The plaintiff has no right to terminate the contract and claim damages from the defendants. However. Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is deemed to be terminated by default. Construction contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is a contract made under Section 587, while a reciprocal agreement. When the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant terminated the plaintiff and the defendant must go to the other party to return to its status as a Section 391 paragraph one, but because the plaintiff to the defendant completed the second installment. unable to return to the status of existing ones. The defendant shall be governed by Section 391 requires the construction of the second installment payment to the plaintiff instead. The defendant has no right to suspend payment of wages as a whole. When the plaintiff and the defendant had notice of the defect, the plaintiff's failure to comply with an agreement to fix things. But the plaintiff did not perform. She likes to be outsourced to correct the defect. The plaintiff is required to pay under Section 594 and the defendant was entitled to deduct the cost of lost wages of the second period only.
Because the plaintiff because the defendant's request to change a malfunction. The larger bedroom. The materials of the plan. Weight than steel, making it bend. The defendant shall participate in any such defect. And it appears that the defendant did not hire anyone to fix the flaws. Court has determined the cost of hiring a third party to fix the defects as appropriate.
Supreme Court in 5201/2549.
Defendant, a contractor who built the building. In this order the defendant to a zinc roof of the plaintiff and the plaintiff's hiring hall. If they fall within the provisions of Section 193 / 34 (1) at the end. Unless it is made to the affairs of the debtor itself. The age of the claims of the plaintiff is a five-year period from the due date for payment the defendant has not filed a default until the expiration of five years, so it does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
The plaintiff delivered the defendant to a building roof and the roof leaks when it rains and when the wind hit. The defect is not found in any given moment on. The defendant is liable to a plaintiff by the defendant in a Section 598 has already paid Sittiiึdhnewg only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff to the defendant that a repair is completed, it prefers to withhold pay for it.
Supreme Court in 4857/2549.
Contract, the plaintiff and the defendant's auto repair is one of the two-year contract made under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1).
The plaintiff delivered the repaired car to the car to repair it. The plaintiff may enforce their rights in order to call the defendant to pay a stipend from the date of delivery of each vehicle to the repair. The defendant to pay money to the plaintiff. It is a debt to the plaintiff. The age break down and start the trip from the new age. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) and Section 193/15.
Plaintiff's debt to 41 items totaling U.S. $ 402,197 which the plaintiff can enforce their rights from the date of May 8, 2541 was filed on June 19, 2543, more than two years against the plaintiff in this section is to expire. The car's debt to 11 of 47,500 baht, it appears that on May 8, 2543, the date of the defendant to pay some debts. Credit repair is all 11 to terminate the transaction. Age of the debt, they have to start counting. And calculated up to a maximum of 2 years against the plaintiff in the lawsuit, it does not terminate the 11 items.
The debt will cause the tripping time must be stopped before they terminate the debt. When the repairs were due to terminate the U.S. $ 402,197 since the date of May 8, 2541 to repay some of the defendants in those days there was no time to stop the disruption.
Supreme Court in 8141/2548.
The plaintiff's goods and the defects. She prefers to withhold and pay the price as payment has not been done because the circumstances in which one defendant, the debtor shall not be responsible. Assume that the defendant defaulted on the payment due date agreed upon in accordance with Section 205 is not the plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest. But when the court requires the defendant to pay this amount. The debt must be paid by the defendant's sentence and must pay interest from the date the plaintiff is entitled to receive from the date of the verdict, the Court of First Instance.
Supreme Court in 4022/2548.
When the plaintiff fails to construct the basement and underground water tanks under the building contract. All three defendants do not pay remuneration to the plaintiff in this section. But on the other. The plaintiff's construction of the second period and third period but not completed it already. The construction of the plaintiff had multiple defects. All three defendants to withhold pay from the 2nd and 3rd period until the plaintiff to repair the defect has been completed in accordance with Section 599 if the plaintiff fails to do so until all three defendants to terminate the contract. All three defendants prefer to deduct the cost of repairing the damage as it should be for them only. The remainder will be refunded to the plaintiff to pay. I like all three defendants will not be paid stipend if they could.
Supreme Court in 2765/2548.
The defendant's first husband had a second to sign as a witness in a contract for the plaintiff to build a house on the land of the defendant, both to stay together with the fact that two of the facts as I have also shown that during the construction of the defendant as well. the two also shared the view taken of the work. The plaintiff is ordered to correct deficiencies, and modification of the second defendant to sign a contract as a contract matter. But the circumstances of the hearing that the defendant is an accomplice and agree to be bound by the contract with the plaintiff. So the construction debt, the plaintiff shall have the authority to bind the defendant in a lawsuit against a defendant who is jointly liable with the defendant, 2.
Supreme Court in 1681 - 1683/2548.
The defendant hired a consultant. The three plaintiffs agreed to proceed with the modification of the apartment hotel. Provide the appropriate personnel working at the hotel. And marketing plan for hotel profits. It is the one that achieved by the defendant at first agreed to pay compensation in the results of work done per month 140,000 Baht a plaintiff to 3 working days are Monday through Friday from 8:30 am to 17:00 o'clock it. This is not working as a defendant to go to work, but it is also the place where the defendant is a provider of contract consultants. And the third defendant did not appear to be under the supervision of the defendant No. 1 and No. 2 is not a contract of employment but a contract made under Section 587.
Supreme Court in 3838/2547.
Defendant hired plaintiff commercial buildings on the land of the defendant. But construction is not completed within the Plaintiffs. The defendant entered the building and such. If a defendant does not take delivery of the defects as well as commercial buildings. Once the defendant is liable for defects in accordance with Section 598 of the Civil and Commercial Code a claim for breach of contract penalty shall be in accordance with Section 381, the defendant refused to live in commercial buildings. Plaintiffs hired construction. Hold that the defendants pay the debt. The defendant did not reserve the right to remove a defendant's penalty at the time of payment accepted. The defendant did not call for penalties under the contract.
Supreme Court in 7592/2547.
Contracts do not stamp duty under section 118 Income Tax I have not heard the evidence in the case, but do not have employment laws that must be in writing or evidenced in writing, to legal action on them. So instead of listening to witness testimony and documents
Supreme Court in 3194/2547.
Defendant's contract to the plaintiff to the defendant and the plaintiff's advertising products advertising products that will be accepted. When the defendant agreed to pay the advertising cost to the plaintiff. It is not the plaintiff, the defendant had the intent to transfer property to one of the defendants. And the defendant agreed to that price. Into a contract under the Civil and Commercial Code Book 3 1 with a sell. However, as the plaintiff contractor agreed to complete the product line to the defendant employer. And the defendant agreed to pay for advertising or pay for the completion of the work done. The characteristics of employment made in accordance with Section 587.
Supreme Court in 7172/2547.
Defects in accordance with Section 601 means a defect which occurs as defined in Section 598, 599 and 600, which refers to a defect in the property, the contractor delivered to the hirer in full. then. Not meant to be not practical to complete the contract. The defendant's testimony kite representing the plaintiff and the defendant was not home from work and reluctant to say or do anything The defendant is not liable to the plaintiff under Section 598 of the opinion that this case is the plaintiff alleged that the defendants breach the contract because it does not work properly. Find the right to sue the defendant liable for defects of the work done. The fact that the defendant is at fault because the contract had been authentic. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the proportion of defendants who have not completed under the contract.
Supreme Court in 1128 - 1129/2547.
Defendant's business travel arrangements to cruise travel.The cruise will be a time to the plaintiff's employment between the plaintiff and the defendant committed to the success of the work is important. Non-employment under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 575, but the employer shall do. 587 The plaintiff is not an employee of the defendant.
Supreme Court in 5203/2546.
The plaintiff delivered in land fills and areas that are not defendants. 1 will be granted or not. Not that the plaintiff delivered the defendant to pay a stipend to the plaintiff as soon as the delivery of the defects may be corrected first. The plaintiff may be entitled to claim from the date the defendant first received the application, the defendant, a sign notes the letter of the committee work on May 3, 2539, but it also claims the plaintiff to adjust. Road to be completed first. Show that given the defendant a day not earlier than May 3, 2539 plaintiff filed suit on April 24, 2541 was a period of two years from the date that the plaintiff could not terminate the enforcement of claim.
Supreme Court to 519/2545.
Defendant from the plaintiff to purchase and install a plastic sheet to lay waste water treatment of the defendant the plaintiff delivered a plastic sheet laid in the pond water that had already The defendant is treated waste water for about 2 to 3 months in plastic lined them up in the aneurysm without any defects found during the delivery. Plaintiff, the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the defendant Sittiiึdhnewg wages, but only to allow the plaintiff to repair these defects only. When the plaintiff contacted the defendant for repair several times. The defendant was not aware of the need to use the pond water. Can not pump out the pond because it will lose revenue. It is not in the nature of the plaintiff's claims, the only contractor that could do that alone. Thus, the plaintiff can not repair the defects of the work is not the fault of the plaintiff. Defendant does not pay the overdue Sittiiึdhnewg anymore.
Supreme Court in 8001/2544.
The plaintiff sued the defendants 1 to 4, as a design engineer who designed it breached the contract about the use of the water. And sued the defendant, a 3, 5 and 6, the engineers who work breached the contract does not determine the form and requirements of water and materials, surface traffic, the construction that can be used. or not. Cause more damage. The plaintiff's lawsuit was not filed claims for compensation for the defect. The age of 1 year under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 601 is liable to be sued for breach of contract, it is the design and supervision of the law, the absence of a specific age. It is generally the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 5229/2544.
Law Act 2528 and regulations regarding etiquette Law Lawyer Law in 2529 by the Commission by virtue of the Act shall come into force not provided. No lawyer is a lawyer by the division of property is not part of the settlement, which will include a client, the contract that specified that "Lawyers will be charged 20 percent of the total funds. When the court to pay attorney's fees. The court can only imagine some of the lawyers, some of which are legal. If the case is not the same lawyers charge 10 percent of the amount of compromise "is not contrary to law. The agreements provide that attorney's fees as a percentage of the funds. And if the court has only partially. Or compromise. Sets the rules for calculating attorney's fees. Are contrary to public order or morality of the public. That the contract is not void. And when none of that contract in the manner of luck. The agreement with the Adgesiikan uncertainty of future events based on a Tie. The contract effort must be made by lawyers and clients that are looking for a bet, according to Section 853 did not.
Supreme Court in 1469/2542.
Defects as defined in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 601 refers to a defect arising as defined in Section 598 599 and 600 is the first one to defect. The property where the contract was delivered to the employer under the contract, the plaintiff sued the defendant's breach of contract and complete the checks within the warehouse building supplies provided that they are termites or not. The defendant did not see the wood for the termites eat calico of the plaintiff, and pest control to put an end to no cigarettes whatever chemical prevents the termites spread all over the place under the terms of the contract to eliminate and prevent termites and the termite bites. calico I was still in a contract such as the plaintiff's complaint, the plaintiff sued the defendant is subject to a liability that is not practical to complete the contract. If not the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 601 as follows: when a defendant fails to complete the contract. Defendant is liable for damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff was calico bite termite damage to the plaintiff. Claims for damages, the law is not age specific. The 10-year time limit under the Civil and Commercial Code and Section 193/30 of the date the plaintiff discovered termite damage to the calico bite lawsuit. Case to the expiration of 10 years, so it does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court in 2031/2541.
The contract between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 and 2, there is agreement about the defects in the agreement that If the construction of the defendant that a contract is made and the defendant 2 is the design and control of the defect within 1 year from the date of delivery, and the plaintiff notified the defendants 1 and 2 repair, but the defendant's first and 2, not repair, modify or repair it. But not completely. The plaintiff has the right to hire others to replace and repair the defendants 1 and 2 will be responsible for the plaintiff to pay wages to the other. 1 and 2, when the defendant fails to comply with the agreement constitutes a breach of contract. Plaintiffs have sued under the contract. If it's not age, according to Section 600 and Section 601 shall not apply because the two provisions apply only if no agreement otherwise. In case this is not the case with the specific provisions of their age. General provisions must be age 10 years, according to Section 164 in force at the time the plaintiff may be entitled to claim shall apply.
Supreme Court in 6675/2541.
Contract that a contract made under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 587 as a result of the litigation or act lawyers to prepare cases, and that is a defense in court until the case is final and the payment of remuneration must be taken. The success of the work or pay remuneration in accordance with the agreed terms, even if the employer to pay remuneration to the full amount of the contract that the employer can terminate the contract in any class or any non-binding agreement to merge.minister of public good, such an agreement is not enforceable.
Supreme Court in 6135/2540.
Although the plaintiff to sue the employer is doing. The court agreed that plaintiff should have a value of the work has been done to the defendant. The court has the power to the plaintiff. Supreme Court ruling that the defendant hired the plaintiff 2996/2540 Construction of commercial buildings, 11 units have been constructed for a plaintiff to make a stop further. When the plaintiff left work. Defendant to inform the police as evidence. Specific intent that the plaintiff was involved in the construction of the next. And the defendant asked the workers if they can continue to work or not. Foreman of the plaintiff that it can continue to work even if the plaintiff does not have to continue to run until the defendant pays the wages for these workers. The plaintiff does not wish to work for the defendant by leaving a job. The defendant had no intent to contract work to another plaintiff. Construction contract between the plaintiff, defendant. Cease to do by default. After the defendant left the plaintiff, then other workers, about 80 people will work as an employee of the defendant as the plaintiff's workers to continue to do as an employee of the defendant. Not as an employee of the plaintiff. The defendant paid the plaintiff leave to workers after work to complete the claim for the payment of the plaintiff. The defendant can not be called up for labor in this part of the plaintiff by counterclaim.
Supreme Court in 2919/2540.
The deliverable is the controversial issue of wages. The plaintiff is not authorized by or reluctant to say or do anything And notes that a defendant delivered to plaintiff, stating that the penalty for a defendant to be deferred. Plaintiff reserves the right to claim further. It sounds like that. The plaintiff has the right to be so in debt. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation from the defendant, either. Sued by the plaintiff's claims based on a defendant charged with a crash bug. The plaintiff informed the defendant that a defendant, but he managed to repair a plaintiff does not need to hire a technician to come to a new defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the total amount of U.S. $ 67,650 which the defendant filed a compliance agreement. The age of 10 years under the Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 7406/2540.
The plaintiff hired the defendant to plead The success of the practice until the case is final. A lost or won as a result of work to pay the stipend only. The lawsuit, plaintiff hired the defendant admitted to the utmost. They have agreed to compromise and withdraw in a civil case filed in court. The court shall have power to determine the appropriate wage for the actions of the plaintiff. Employment contract that is made of a reciprocal agreement, both parties have paid the debt must be paid to each other. The difference in accounts receivable and accounts payable at the same time. When the plaintiff employee has worked for the employer, the defendant and the defendant received a benefit that is. The plaintiff shall be entitled to receive remuneration as a result of the actions. The agreement that "Whether the case is and how they are to the satisfaction of the defendant" is not only a great deal about the outcome or end result of the transactions. Not according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 144 (unchanged) Section 182 (new) that the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is not void.
Supreme Court in 6144/2539.
Civil and commercial trading of the contract made with the aim to transfer a property transaction. The contract to do the work and achievements of the work is important. The work done on the subject of a Section 592 defines the duties of the contractor that the contractor must allow the employer or employer's representative to inspect, at any time, and Section 605 defines the rights of the employer. If the work is not completed, as long as you do. The employer may terminate the agreement on the compensation to the contractor for any damages arising out of contract case, but the contact between the plaintiff and defendant in the weaving of any agreement in writing. It therefore ordered the defendant to the plaintiff verbally woven fabric according to the pattern set by the number of defendants accused of the course. Terms of delivery and payment of a fabric in accordance with that stated in the contract and to Weaver as a defendant. Plaintiffs will prompt others to be woven. During which the defendant did not have the control, monitoring, fabric, weaving and textiles will be eliminated. The legal relationship between plaintiff and defendant that a contract is movable. The defendant ordered the plaintiff to a cloth several times. Order fabric in which the price exceeds 500 and does not have a book signed by the person liable or have a routine or have been paying some of the plaintiff to sue them in court for the defendant: 1. The fabrics are woven in the order are not.
