Section 486 buyer must take delivery of the property they have purchased and used in accordance with the Contract.
Section 487 requires that the property sold for in the contract. Or a way to release it to the one just agreed to. I promise. Or is deemed by the parties to act upon it.
If the price is not the decisive one gem like that. He stated that the buyer will have to use it.
Section 488 if the buyer found defects in the property which it has been purchased. Buyers prefer to withhold the price has not been paid in full or in part. Unless the seller is guaranteed to fit them.
Section 489 if the purchaser is the mortgagee or person claiming the property sold is threatened. Have filed a lawsuit on it. Or has reasonable cause to believe that it is being threatened. The buyer would prefer to withhold all or part of the experience for them. The seller will not treat any threat until the end. Or the vendor will provide appropriate insurance.
Section 490 if it determines that the delivery of the property is sold at any time. You shall be presumed that the time for the same price.
Supreme Court in 8635/2550.
In order to purchase fruit tree species had been appointed to the Committee on the Ministry's Procurement Committee. But the implementation of such management is in the internal affairs of the defendant. The contract does not have an agreement that the delivery of goods must be made by the Board. Committee appointed for the defendant supplies. Statement of the defendant, the plaintiff was not bound. The plaintiff, a sub-species of fruit to deliver to the defendant within the time prescribed by this contract, and g is the chairman and managing director of the defendant in order to receive the King. Varieties of fruits from the plaintiff before the plaintiff to deliver the village headman. Under the premise of delivering fruit tree species. A circumstance which shows clearly that the defendant has been given fruit tree species. Plaintiffs argue that neither of them by the fruit tree species are incomplete, or invalid contract.
Proof of delivery of sub-varieties of fruits and g, which was signed in the delivery of supplies, it says. The delivery of supplies have been delivered to the village and sub-varieties of fruits. To be delivered to people in their village the next. This message indicates that the defendants have been given sub-species of fruits and already not only been given to the Committee to make a parcel. When the defendant has been given sub-species of fruits from the plaintiff was required to complete the contract. The defendant has no right to terminate the contract and forfeit the deposit of the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 8141/2548.
The plaintiff's goods and the defects. She prefers to withhold and pay the price as payment has not been done because the circumstances in which the defendant is one. The debtor shall not be responsible. Assume that the defendant defaulted on the payment due date agreed upon in accordance with Section 205 is not the plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest. But when the court requires the defendant to pay this amount. The debt must be paid by the defendant's sentence and must pay interest from the day. The plaintiff is entitled to receive from the date of the verdict, the Court of First Instance.
Supreme Court 66 - 67/2547.
That the defendant purchased from plaintiff's defect. The plaintiff was not repaired properly. When the defects in the property market. The seller is liable under Section 472 of the defendants, who prefers to withhold the price has not been paid in full or in part. Unless the seller is a reasonable assurance to the Section 488 petition, the plaintiff, the plaintiff is the party that claims to be a bona fide not. Associated with a contract to buy and sell land and house, between the Company and the defendant. And the defendant can be sued for damages from the company said. That the plaintiff was the managing director and the company continued to act both in and record the transfer of claims. Plaintiff certifies that it will repair the damage all by themselves. I checked all five defendants be ordered to pay the debt by the transfer of claims. It is due to the down payment for land and homes under contract. Buy and sell land and houses. When listening to the fact that the plaintiff that the defect had been repaired. Defendants do not like to withhold payment for the land and house without bringing money into the account of such payment by the defendant is not guilty. Act offenses arising from the checks of Section 4.
Supreme Court in 1678/2546.
The buyer has notified the defendant to the plaintiff, the seller refunded the fabric, but the plaintiff did not tender to the plaintiff to the defendant only help sell the clothes to someone else. Plaintiff returned to service only when a person or other customers to buy clothes only. When the plaintiff sold some clothes to get employees of the plaintiff from the defendant's clothes. It does not mean that The plaintiff received all the fabric, but agreed that plaintiff would receive when selling the fabric to fabric was only partial agreement as the plaintiff to the defendant for the rest of the fabric. Not agree to return the clothes. Defendant is liable to pay the remaining fabric to the plaintiff.
The defendant did not. You can pay to the plaintiff because the defendant had Thor Buyers fabrics from financial difficulties to settle the case. It is the business of trading profits or losses suffered as normal. Trade will occur always to be regarded as force majeure, which would make the defendant. Relief from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 219, paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 1020/2546.
When the plaintiff paid for cars, motorcycles, 52 to represent the defendant, and Sat. Defendant as a principal shall have the obligation to the plaintiff, a person employed in a variety of agents have been made to the Sat Civil and Commercial Code, Section 820, it held that the plaintiff has paid the price of motorcycles, 52 cars to the defendant. The law, then the MP will not deliver the money to the defendant's motorcycle was the defendant. Which is the correct recourse is to remove from the MP who represents the plaintiff was not a party breaches the contract. Defendants have a duty to deliver documents to the plaintiff. The plaintiff would have to be included in the registration of motorcycles. When the defendant fails to comply shall be known as a breach of contract. Be subject to damages to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 519/2545.
Defendant from the plaintiff to purchase and install a plastic sheet to lay waste water treatment of the defendant the plaintiff delivered a plastic sheet laid in the pond water that had already The defendant is treated waste water for about 2 to 3 months in plastic lined them up in the aneurysm without any defects found in When delivered. Plaintiff, the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the defendant Sittiiึdhnewg wages, but only to allow the plaintiff to repair. Such defects only. When the plaintiff contacted the defendant for repair several times. The defendant was not aware of the need to use the pond water. Can not pump out the pond because it will lose revenue. It is not in the nature of the plaintiff's claims, the only contractor that can. Performed alone. Thus, the plaintiff can not repair the defects of the work is not. Yes, the fault of the plaintiff. Defendant does not pay the overdue Sittiiึdhnewg anymore.
Supreme Court in 6443/2544.
Contract unless the seller has an obligation to deliver goods to sell to a buyer then the buyer is obligated to pay the price to the seller in return, according to Section 486 on the defendant to admit it. The plaintiff sued the actual purchase. The defendant has the obligation to pay the purchase price to the plaintiff within the prescribed time. Credit to the plaintiff to the defendant. The contention that the defendant. Defendants have no obligation to pay the price to the plaintiff. On the ground of breach of contract, the plaintiff is a party to the defendant as a dealer. Plaintiff's sole distributor in Thailand, then back to the plaintiff. Many persons in a price lower than sold to the defendant. The plaintiffs have warranty for 1 year from date of purchase for products to dodge, but the plaintiff does not carry the product. Without charge. It is the defendant has raised a new defense to ward off liability, not to pay. Price to the plaintiff. The burden of proof falls upon the defendant.
According to Section 456 paragraph two and paragraph three. We agreed on a sale of movable property, which is five percent or more. Is up to them. Once the favorite. Or partial payment then. Would bring the court together. The plaintiff sued the defendant for delivery to the defendant's orders. Held that a debt contract to the defendant. The plaintiff shall have the right to sue to force the defendant to pay for items.
Supreme Court to 472/2542.
The defendant is an entity that is a partnership of the two defendants accused of operating a second car without the owner's name in the register. And car ownership dispute. Buy a car from the defendant disputes the plaintiff and a defendant has been delivering cars to customers of the plaintiff. The contract dispute between the defendant and deliver the car the two conditions. That the defendant's ownership of the car 2 is transferred to the defendant.Shall be determined by one method under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 487 and did not schedule a payment to the defendant's car would see that such a contract and deliver the car. Between the defendant and without a regular contract. The defendant. 2 delivery vehicles in the possession of the defendants dispute that. 1, which operates car as defendant No. 2 in the evident fact that one would bring such cars to be sold to people around you to act like this, holding that the defendant, the second is that the anonymity and Allowing a defendant to be noticeable, which represents a place that has the right to own or sell. News disputes it. When the plaintiff purchased the car in good faith disputed by the two defendants should be liable to the plaintiff under the contract and must register the ownership of the car. Dispute with the registration book to the plaintiff if the defendant be sentenced to 2 is not the court's verdict of the court, the defendant's intent to 2.
Supreme Court in 3883/2540.
Both defendants claim that the plaintiff's complaint is not labeled. Both the defendant's purchase amount when the defendant received from the plaintiff or not. When it appears that the plaintiff filed a lecture in early 2536 to the end of June 2536 the defendant purchased two different types of paper from the plaintiff. Many times, the total amount of U.S. $ 173,868.50 and the defendant. Such as paper describes the defendant's indictment. Both defendants claim that none of the above. Is complete and the defendant both claimed that the plaintiff did not sue the payments described how the defendant to pay the overdue since when. When the plaintiff began to charge interest. The bubble Eclืabclum it. According to the complaint, the plaintiff identified the defendant as part of the plaintiff and the receiver. The product in early 2536 to end of June. 2536 will not have a personal statement to be used. But according to the Civil and Commercial Law Section 490 shall be presumed that at the same time delivering the price the property sold, then the defendant fails to understand that the product is not used then. And even if the plaintiff does not specify the date on which the plaintiff was the interest. The plaintiff states that the plaintiff's interest from the date of default to the lawsuit, only 5 months, the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on January 27, 2537, if after the end of June 2536 which the plaintiff that the defendant either to buy a paper from the plaintiff. the last time. To sue would be a waste of time 6 months, but the plaintiff's interest is only 5 months. When starting from the date of filing the past five months, it can calculate the interest payments that the plaintiff has demanded. It is not necessary to specify the date on which the plaintiff sued the defendant's interest was not ambiguous
Supreme Court to 421/2536.
According to the complaint, the plaintiff's conclusion. Both purchased from defendant, plaintiff was paid 288,000 U.S. hemp and hemp are not paid to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the price of hemp, both the plaintiff and the plaintiff sued to describe the transfer of claims by a lecture. The defendant did not know why the plaintiff paid for hemp so only when the defendant both testified that the two defendants. Never trade with the plaintiff, defendant, an order from hemp. I think the amount of U.S. $ 232,000 of the disputed issues in this case is whether the defendant from the plaintiff sued both the purchase of hemp, or in spite of what the court will not be an issue Chigsagstan the dispute. It is true the disputed issue in the lawsuit, the plaintiff and the defendant claims to. Both parties have refused to investigate the evidence on the issue of such courts. Therefore, the initial diagnosis of the case to the dispute at issue is correct. And the court ruled that both defendants liable to pay U.S. $ 288,000 to the plaintiff for the amount of virus that can be diagnosed over the complaint and the request of the plaintiff. The plaintiff may submit testimony by witnesses, but would not allow any person to listen. Documentary evidence such as this. If the Court is dealing. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 490 stipulates that if the parties that the delivery of the property market at any time. You shall be presumed that the time for the same price. When the plaintiff delivered to the Department of Logistics, Air Force hemp as the defendant. Department of Logistics, Air Force and have been duly given on September 30, 2529, so I had to pay to the plaintiff, which sells hemp in the day. The same. When the defendant defaulted on the payments would be called. The plaintiff sued the defendant to pay the price of hemp without notice.
Section 487 requires that the property sold for in the contract. Or a way to release it to the one just agreed to. I promise. Or is deemed by the parties to act upon it.
If the price is not the decisive one gem like that. He stated that the buyer will have to use it.
Section 488 if the buyer found defects in the property which it has been purchased. Buyers prefer to withhold the price has not been paid in full or in part. Unless the seller is guaranteed to fit them.
Section 489 if the purchaser is the mortgagee or person claiming the property sold is threatened. Have filed a lawsuit on it. Or has reasonable cause to believe that it is being threatened. The buyer would prefer to withhold all or part of the experience for them. The seller will not treat any threat until the end. Or the vendor will provide appropriate insurance.
Section 490 if it determines that the delivery of the property is sold at any time. You shall be presumed that the time for the same price.
Supreme Court in 8635/2550.
In order to purchase fruit tree species had been appointed to the Committee on the Ministry's Procurement Committee. But the implementation of such management is in the internal affairs of the defendant. The contract does not have an agreement that the delivery of goods must be made by the Board. Committee appointed for the defendant supplies. Statement of the defendant, the plaintiff was not bound. The plaintiff, a sub-species of fruit to deliver to the defendant within the time prescribed by this contract, and g is the chairman and managing director of the defendant in order to receive the King. Varieties of fruits from the plaintiff before the plaintiff to deliver the village headman. Under the premise of delivering fruit tree species. A circumstance which shows clearly that the defendant has been given fruit tree species. Plaintiffs argue that neither of them by the fruit tree species are incomplete, or invalid contract.
Proof of delivery of sub-varieties of fruits and g, which was signed in the delivery of supplies, it says. The delivery of supplies have been delivered to the village and sub-varieties of fruits. To be delivered to people in their village the next. This message indicates that the defendants have been given sub-species of fruits and already not only been given to the Committee to make a parcel. When the defendant has been given sub-species of fruits from the plaintiff was required to complete the contract. The defendant has no right to terminate the contract and forfeit the deposit of the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 8141/2548.
The plaintiff's goods and the defects. She prefers to withhold and pay the price as payment has not been done because the circumstances in which the defendant is one. The debtor shall not be responsible. Assume that the defendant defaulted on the payment due date agreed upon in accordance with Section 205 is not the plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest. But when the court requires the defendant to pay this amount. The debt must be paid by the defendant's sentence and must pay interest from the day. The plaintiff is entitled to receive from the date of the verdict, the Court of First Instance.
Supreme Court 66 - 67/2547.
That the defendant purchased from plaintiff's defect. The plaintiff was not repaired properly. When the defects in the property market. The seller is liable under Section 472 of the defendants, who prefers to withhold the price has not been paid in full or in part. Unless the seller is a reasonable assurance to the Section 488 petition, the plaintiff, the plaintiff is the party that claims to be a bona fide not. Associated with a contract to buy and sell land and house, between the Company and the defendant. And the defendant can be sued for damages from the company said. That the plaintiff was the managing director and the company continued to act both in and record the transfer of claims. Plaintiff certifies that it will repair the damage all by themselves. I checked all five defendants be ordered to pay the debt by the transfer of claims. It is due to the down payment for land and homes under contract. Buy and sell land and houses. When listening to the fact that the plaintiff that the defect had been repaired. Defendants do not like to withhold payment for the land and house without bringing money into the account of such payment by the defendant is not guilty. Act offenses arising from the checks of Section 4.
Supreme Court in 1678/2546.
The buyer has notified the defendant to the plaintiff, the seller refunded the fabric, but the plaintiff did not tender to the plaintiff to the defendant only help sell the clothes to someone else. Plaintiff returned to service only when a person or other customers to buy clothes only. When the plaintiff sold some clothes to get employees of the plaintiff from the defendant's clothes. It does not mean that The plaintiff received all the fabric, but agreed that plaintiff would receive when selling the fabric to fabric was only partial agreement as the plaintiff to the defendant for the rest of the fabric. Not agree to return the clothes. Defendant is liable to pay the remaining fabric to the plaintiff.
The defendant did not. You can pay to the plaintiff because the defendant had Thor Buyers fabrics from financial difficulties to settle the case. It is the business of trading profits or losses suffered as normal. Trade will occur always to be regarded as force majeure, which would make the defendant. Relief from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 219, paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 1020/2546.
When the plaintiff paid for cars, motorcycles, 52 to represent the defendant, and Sat. Defendant as a principal shall have the obligation to the plaintiff, a person employed in a variety of agents have been made to the Sat Civil and Commercial Code, Section 820, it held that the plaintiff has paid the price of motorcycles, 52 cars to the defendant. The law, then the MP will not deliver the money to the defendant's motorcycle was the defendant. Which is the correct recourse is to remove from the MP who represents the plaintiff was not a party breaches the contract. Defendants have a duty to deliver documents to the plaintiff. The plaintiff would have to be included in the registration of motorcycles. When the defendant fails to comply shall be known as a breach of contract. Be subject to damages to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 519/2545.
Defendant from the plaintiff to purchase and install a plastic sheet to lay waste water treatment of the defendant the plaintiff delivered a plastic sheet laid in the pond water that had already The defendant is treated waste water for about 2 to 3 months in plastic lined them up in the aneurysm without any defects found in When delivered. Plaintiff, the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the defendant Sittiiึdhnewg wages, but only to allow the plaintiff to repair. Such defects only. When the plaintiff contacted the defendant for repair several times. The defendant was not aware of the need to use the pond water. Can not pump out the pond because it will lose revenue. It is not in the nature of the plaintiff's claims, the only contractor that can. Performed alone. Thus, the plaintiff can not repair the defects of the work is not. Yes, the fault of the plaintiff. Defendant does not pay the overdue Sittiiึdhnewg anymore.
Supreme Court in 6443/2544.
Contract unless the seller has an obligation to deliver goods to sell to a buyer then the buyer is obligated to pay the price to the seller in return, according to Section 486 on the defendant to admit it. The plaintiff sued the actual purchase. The defendant has the obligation to pay the purchase price to the plaintiff within the prescribed time. Credit to the plaintiff to the defendant. The contention that the defendant. Defendants have no obligation to pay the price to the plaintiff. On the ground of breach of contract, the plaintiff is a party to the defendant as a dealer. Plaintiff's sole distributor in Thailand, then back to the plaintiff. Many persons in a price lower than sold to the defendant. The plaintiffs have warranty for 1 year from date of purchase for products to dodge, but the plaintiff does not carry the product. Without charge. It is the defendant has raised a new defense to ward off liability, not to pay. Price to the plaintiff. The burden of proof falls upon the defendant.
According to Section 456 paragraph two and paragraph three. We agreed on a sale of movable property, which is five percent or more. Is up to them. Once the favorite. Or partial payment then. Would bring the court together. The plaintiff sued the defendant for delivery to the defendant's orders. Held that a debt contract to the defendant. The plaintiff shall have the right to sue to force the defendant to pay for items.
Supreme Court to 472/2542.
The defendant is an entity that is a partnership of the two defendants accused of operating a second car without the owner's name in the register. And car ownership dispute. Buy a car from the defendant disputes the plaintiff and a defendant has been delivering cars to customers of the plaintiff. The contract dispute between the defendant and deliver the car the two conditions. That the defendant's ownership of the car 2 is transferred to the defendant.Shall be determined by one method under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 487 and did not schedule a payment to the defendant's car would see that such a contract and deliver the car. Between the defendant and without a regular contract. The defendant. 2 delivery vehicles in the possession of the defendants dispute that. 1, which operates car as defendant No. 2 in the evident fact that one would bring such cars to be sold to people around you to act like this, holding that the defendant, the second is that the anonymity and Allowing a defendant to be noticeable, which represents a place that has the right to own or sell. News disputes it. When the plaintiff purchased the car in good faith disputed by the two defendants should be liable to the plaintiff under the contract and must register the ownership of the car. Dispute with the registration book to the plaintiff if the defendant be sentenced to 2 is not the court's verdict of the court, the defendant's intent to 2.
Supreme Court in 3883/2540.
Both defendants claim that the plaintiff's complaint is not labeled. Both the defendant's purchase amount when the defendant received from the plaintiff or not. When it appears that the plaintiff filed a lecture in early 2536 to the end of June 2536 the defendant purchased two different types of paper from the plaintiff. Many times, the total amount of U.S. $ 173,868.50 and the defendant. Such as paper describes the defendant's indictment. Both defendants claim that none of the above. Is complete and the defendant both claimed that the plaintiff did not sue the payments described how the defendant to pay the overdue since when. When the plaintiff began to charge interest. The bubble Eclืabclum it. According to the complaint, the plaintiff identified the defendant as part of the plaintiff and the receiver. The product in early 2536 to end of June. 2536 will not have a personal statement to be used. But according to the Civil and Commercial Law Section 490 shall be presumed that at the same time delivering the price the property sold, then the defendant fails to understand that the product is not used then. And even if the plaintiff does not specify the date on which the plaintiff was the interest. The plaintiff states that the plaintiff's interest from the date of default to the lawsuit, only 5 months, the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on January 27, 2537, if after the end of June 2536 which the plaintiff that the defendant either to buy a paper from the plaintiff. the last time. To sue would be a waste of time 6 months, but the plaintiff's interest is only 5 months. When starting from the date of filing the past five months, it can calculate the interest payments that the plaintiff has demanded. It is not necessary to specify the date on which the plaintiff sued the defendant's interest was not ambiguous
Supreme Court to 421/2536.
According to the complaint, the plaintiff's conclusion. Both purchased from defendant, plaintiff was paid 288,000 U.S. hemp and hemp are not paid to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the price of hemp, both the plaintiff and the plaintiff sued to describe the transfer of claims by a lecture. The defendant did not know why the plaintiff paid for hemp so only when the defendant both testified that the two defendants. Never trade with the plaintiff, defendant, an order from hemp. I think the amount of U.S. $ 232,000 of the disputed issues in this case is whether the defendant from the plaintiff sued both the purchase of hemp, or in spite of what the court will not be an issue Chigsagstan the dispute. It is true the disputed issue in the lawsuit, the plaintiff and the defendant claims to. Both parties have refused to investigate the evidence on the issue of such courts. Therefore, the initial diagnosis of the case to the dispute at issue is correct. And the court ruled that both defendants liable to pay U.S. $ 288,000 to the plaintiff for the amount of virus that can be diagnosed over the complaint and the request of the plaintiff. The plaintiff may submit testimony by witnesses, but would not allow any person to listen. Documentary evidence such as this. If the Court is dealing. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 490 stipulates that if the parties that the delivery of the property market at any time. You shall be presumed that the time for the same price. When the plaintiff delivered to the Department of Logistics, Air Force hemp as the defendant. Department of Logistics, Air Force and have been duly given on September 30, 2529, so I had to pay to the plaintiff, which sells hemp in the day. The same. When the defendant defaulted on the payments would be called. The plaintiff sued the defendant to pay the price of hemp without notice.
