Carriage of

Section 610 A person who has an agreement with the carrier to move to it. The sender. Or consignor.
The person who sent it to them. The consignee.
Pension will be paid to the logistics of it. The freight transport.

Section 611 of the device of the freight vehicles. Include any cost. According to tradition, the carrier's interest to be in transit.

Section 612 if the carrier is called a waybill The sender must make.
The invoice must show the following.
(1) the condition and weight. Or the size of the sending state and the amount of packaging.
(2) the sending district.
(3) the name or brand. And the Office of the consignee.
(4) district and the date of the invoice.
The invoice must be signed by the sender is important.

Section 613 if the sender is a delivery order The carrier must make.
Lading must show the following.
(1) The list referred to in Article 612 § 1,2 and 3.
(2) the sender's name or brand.
(3) the number of freight vehicles.
(4) district and date of issue of lading.
The consignment note must be signed by the carrier is important.

Section 614 although the delivery will be issued to any person who signed it. I transferred him to endorse it. Unless it is prohibited to endorse it.

Section 615 provides that if delivery has been made. That you are authorized to be on the expropriation of lading. Or when the consignee to insure, as it should.

Section 616 the carrier will be liable for any of them, he was assigned to the loss or damage or delivery delay. Unless it is proved that the loss or damage or delay is caused not by force majeure. Or the condition of it. Or is it the fault of the sender or the consignee.

Section 617 the carrier will be liable for loss of or damage or delay caused by the fault of the carrier to another. If the other party or of which he was assigned to one of the other chips.

Section 618 of them sent to you by various successive carriers, that carrier will be liable for my share in the loss, damage or delay.

Section 619 if the condition is to cause harm. Or condition, lest they cause damage to persons or property gem. The sender must provide a pre-condition of the contract if it fails to do so, the sender will be liable for any losses incurred but not of it.

Section 620 the carrier is not liable for bank bills, bonds, notes Egintagtra Pratwnsincga debenture stock certificates, jewelry and other valuables that you do not get a price or condition of the while delivering to them.
But if they tell. That would have limited the liability of the carrier is not over for me.

Section 621 Compensation for delay in delivery of such persons shall not exceed the amount as may be required in case of total loss.

Section 622 of the one. The carrier shall notify the consignee.

Section 623 the liability of the carrier will end up on the consignee to remove them without reluctant to say or do anything The use of freight vehicles on both devices is complete.
But that said, you shall not apply in case of loss or damage to the external conditions, but not of it. If you notice any loss or damage to the carrier within eight days after delivery.
The provisions of this you shall not apply in the event of fraud or gross negligence, which is fine, it is the fault of the carrier.

Section 624 in the carrier's liability for loss of or damage or delay it. You shall not be filed after the expiration of one year after delivery. Or one year from the date it was delivered. Except in cases of fraud.

Section 625 of the bill of lading or other documents so removed from the carrier to deliver it. If the message exclude or limit any liability of the carrier. He that is void. Unless the sender is presented with an explicit agreement to exclude or limit such liability.

Section 626 as long as it is in the hands of the carrier. As long as the sender. If delivery is made, the consignment note. The carrier may suspend delivery of the next. Or returned. Or management of any of the other two.
Event like this. The carrier prefers to be paid by the freight transportation and logistics to handle the distance. With all other expenses that may be lost because it's a return. Because otherwise the deal.

Section 627 on the sub-set of the sender and consignee are called to be delivered. But then you go right all the person that caused the contract of carriage that would fall to such consignee.

Section 628 if that's lost due to force majeure. He said the carrier is not entitled to payment for freight vehicles. If and how to get to them first and then returning them completely.

Section 629 if the carrier of any shipment of waste, but the freight vehicles and equipment, gem. He said that the carrier is still liable for the freight carrier before their vehicles and equipment, which is owed to him.

Section 630 the carrier prefers to withhold out of them as necessary to secure the money for freight vehicles and equipment.

Section 631 if the consignee did not find it. If the consignee does not accept the repudiation of it. The carrier must notify the sender immediately. And asked that the order of the sender.
If you can, as circumstances prevented it. If the sender is not ignoring the orders in time to it. Or send a command that does not have to comply with it. He said the carrier is authorized to remove the deposit of property has been deposited at the office.
If any of the packaging of fresh Lhu waste. And delay that would be vulnerable to damage it. If it does not look to be worth the price of freight vehicles and equipment from. The carrier will not lose any of the public auction.
The removal of the deposit or removal of such public auction, the carrier must notify the sender or the consignee shall not delay. Unless unable to do so. The neglect of the carrier and unannounced gem. You will be liable for damages.

Section 632 on the auction and then get out of the net amount of money. The carrier, less the amount of freight vehicles and equipment. If there are any remaining money will be given to how much a person should have the money at once.

Section 633 if it was transported by a carrier, various chips, that carrier after the use of such rights under section 630, 631, 632, in the freight vehicles and equipment due to the. Transportation everyone.

Supreme Court in 5746/2553.
Shipping invoice or receipt issued to the defendant's two employees of the plaintiff's goods were delivered. There is a limit of liability of employees of the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 was signed on the suppliers. The front end of the document states that only have one. Delivery should be valued for the sake of your own. And one that Please note the conditions in the employment of ETO products behind this. The back of the document as a condition of employment. There is one condition that Article 7. Transporting other cargo. Than those specified in a. and b.. Sender or the employer agrees to indemnify the price or ETO, but not exceeding $ 5,000 to transport a document to a front end of the document. is only a warning or instructions for Shippers practice. There is no such agreement that expressly exclude or limit liability in between. Transport and return. Text exclude or limit the liability of two defendants was void under Section 625 of the Civil and Commercial Code
Paper products, printing and Film plaintiff hired to transport a high price. It's not that the other is the meaning of Section 620 paragraph one, the plaintiff does not need to tell them the price or condition of the defendant delivered to the second carrier to the defendant. 2 must be jointly liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff in order that the damages under Section 616.

Supreme Court in 5597/2551.
It stipulates that no tax. Providing transport services in the UK mean. It's the meaning of Section 608 and Section 610 of such provisions. The transport means for transporting goods or passengers from one place to another. The pension is liable to a normal course of business of the carrier vehicle or a pension granted to non-freight vehicles. Service is not a carrier. Freight transport which is more or less depends on the distance. The difficulty and duration of transport is essential. On retirement, the plaintiff received from the customer as compensation to the plaintiff's staff. Delivery to the customer according to customer orders. As compensation the plaintiff receives a monthly amount is agreed upon in the contract. Employment services, regardless of the distance. The difficulty and duration of the transit time is important. Brokerages that the plaintiff can not be regarded as a freight vehicle. Services of the plaintiff in such a manner that will not constitute delivery. Exempt from income tax under Section 81 I (1) (p) will be available in the Kingdom it.

Supreme Court to 468/2551.
When shipping a product that's worth. The plaintiff, who was told that the condition of a clock and tell them the price of the transmission. The defendant then presented to the carrier. The defendant must be taken care of in product transportation. When a product is lost. The defendant was liable to indemnify the price, the price is said to themselves, as Section 616, 620, and the plaintiff has expressly agreed with the defendant's liability is limited by the restrictions. The back of the receipt of the carriage by air. Such a limitation is invalid under section 625 the plaintiff was not required to pay the charge rather than accept the liability of the defendant and the plaintiff did not charge the plaintiff will be getting the wrong result. Damage as well. And a reduction in damages of the plaintiff's circumstances are not. Defendant is liable to indemnify the carrier for goods transport.

Supreme Court to 468/2551.
Transport of valuable goods. The plaintiff, who was told that the condition of a clock and tell them the price of the carrier to deliver to the defendant. The defendant must be taken care of in product transportation. When a product is lost. The defendant was liable to indemnify the price, the price is said to themselves, as Section 616, 620, and the plaintiff has expressly agreed with the defendant's liability is limited by the restrictions. The back of the receipt of the carriage by air. Such a limitation is invalid under section 625 does not require the plaintiff to the defendant's liability to pay surcharge. Instead of accepting liability. Moreover, the plaintiff can not charge the plaintiff shall be deemed to constitute a mistake. Damages and the damages of the plaintiff's circumstances to reduce a defendant carrier is not liable for damages as the price of the goods transported by the Court.

Supreme Court to 173/2551.
Despite the fact that the defendant will be received by the three appeals that the defendants 3 and L as a separate entity by the third defendant in the business of carriage of passengers carriage of the L operator. But why would you drive all the belly of passenger aircraft, the three defendants accused of selling space, the three companies to get Lo goods on behalf of their own. The two defendants were represented by l and l such shipments, the shipment will come with the plane of the third defendant, using the space under the airplane that carried the three defendants to sell the goods. The three are accused of being involved with the transport. It is responsible for the import of goods from one place to another and so on. The pension is a benefit to their normal trade. This must be the product of three co-defendants to transport the oil. The various successive carriers, the three defendants must jointly liable for the loss of such goods in accordance with Section 618.

Supreme Court in 5136/2550.
The carriage of cargo by air transport is therefore a need to apply Section 625 to Section 625 which states that the "bill of lading or other document like that better. The carrier issued to the sender. If the message exclude or limit any liability of the carrier. He that is void. Unless the sender is presented with an explicit agreement to exclude or limit liability for such "a problem that the two defendants, the carrier will be liable to any Must be determined according to the law.

The first defendant on behalf of the company's suppliers helicopter engaged the second defendant to the bill transport by air freight documents, the District 4, so the helicopter suppliers, which have ties to the defendant. 2, which is third in the affairs of a defendant who is acting within the powers of the agency. The consignee is not even agreement on the bill limits the liability of air transport document, the District 4, but on the rights of those who caused it to fall into such a contract of carriage, the consignee by P.p. up. . Section 627 agreement, the liability so that they can use their company's helicopter was also used to confirm the consignee and the consignee's rights as well.

Both defendants are members of the International Air Transport Association, and. Agree to be bound by the terms of the association, said about the limit of liability is the liability for loss or damage to transport goods or property. A requirement for those members in the same practice is not liable to pay the price and the price I was quoted. Loss or damage to such goods which the carrier is responsible. Liability will be limited to no more than 20 U.S. dollars per 1 kg weight was calculated from the weight of the goods lost. Transport a defendant to a document is assigned to the 2nd defendant Mon 4, then under such a liability. When suppliers do not report prices for transport. The suppliers need to increase the freight transportation is chosen. Acceptable limits of liability stated on the back of the receipt for carriage by air itself. It held that a defendant who is representing the suppliers have agreed to expressly in the definition. The second defendant's liability carrier is $ 20 per 1 kg of weight, such liability shall have the force was not prohibited by Section 625.

Supreme Court in 4432/2550.
The Company has entered into a company's products to both defendants. Which determines whether the message. Under the terms of the contract on the back of the air waybill. These terms and conditions set forth in the text that limits the liability of the carrier is liable for any delay in delivery is limited ... it is $ 100 per shipment or U.S. $ 9.07 per 1 pound (20 U.S. dollars per 1 kg) of the invoice. Products that are worth the price of U.S. $ 5080, but in the value of shipments (Total Declared Value For Carriage) provided a U.S. $ 100 only. The plaintiff also admitted that the transportation of ownership dispute, the Company has engaged a. May be responsible for delivery instead. The employees of that company had signed as the sender. Both have said. There is a tradition on the international shipping company that has used the services of the defendants in both a. Many times we hear that the Ministry of the consignor agree to the terms of the text, exclude or limit liability. Transportation Section 625 explicitly by the two defendants are liable for only $ 100 K. The amount of the plaintiff, the insurer's subrogation claim with the defendant. The liability is only $ 100 as well.

Supreme Court in 6011/2550.
Suppliers can deliver the goods to employees of the defendant carrier, and invoices. And the receipt for carriage by air. The defendant submitted that the delivery form. The types of products that enter Class 18 K gold jewelry that she tell the condition of the cargo has been delivered to them while they go.

The plaintiff appeals that have been lost due to the negligence of the defendant's appeal is more than or other than those listed in the indictment. Is not lifted by the court that it's intellectual property and trade. The middle, so do not get diagnosed. The agreement limits the liability of the defendant is not contrary to public order is in force.

Supreme Court in 8530/2549.
We deliver to the insured. Court blocks order to have wet rot and tear, misuse, collapse, and some are not placed on the base. The boxes are not placed on the base is different from the condition that the defendant received. Delivered to the sender of the delivery. Stating that the dispute has placed on the base 167, including 12 employees of the insured while being taken to collect evidence of damage. Initially, the appearance. Have demonstrated that the defendant did not accept that the goods are delivered in the condition of the driver and the defendant was aware of it. The employees of the insured to sign the order because it appeared in Initially it came as a complete number of boxes specified in the consignment note. Assumes that the insured received the goods without Aideaืgon not. Defendant does not escape liability under Section 623, first paragraph, the reference to Section 623 paragraph two, the defect does not appear, but the external conditions, the owner. Notice within 8 days of receipt of the case under Section 623, paragraph two, it appears that there's no Aideaืgon and pay freight vehicles, according to Section 623, first paragraph, the liability of the defendant will be terminated. The fact that the insured is not the consignee has received. Reluctant to say or do anything
without it. Even if the consignee is not notified about the damage to the defendant, within eight days whether the defendant's liability was not terminated.

Supreme Court in 4787/2549.
Plaintiffs traveled from Bangkok to Udon Thani on July 25, 2541, which the defendants should be delivered to the plaintiff lost luggage. Age, they start from that date. The plaintiff is filed on August 9, 2542, the expiration of one year, but on November 13, 2541 the defendant sent a letter of consent compensation for damages to the plaintiff the amount of U.S. $ 400, although not the full amount of plaintiff's claims. It is a book for the debt. As a result, age and down to stumble under Section 193/14 (1) When the plaintiff brought a lawsuit was filed on August 9, 2542 did not terminate the.

Supreme Court in 7970/2549.
When suppliers send all five of the defendants, both with a long-time suppliers have the opportunity to review the terms of carriage by air and get a receipt. Terms of the agreement. It also has a word of testimony from two defendants that The defendant explained to the staff of the two employees I know on several occasions that in the back of a receipt for carriage by air carrier's liability is limited to the carriage by air, along with the receipt of documents for the District 3 District 7. 0.11 District 15 and District 19 in the number 10, which the suppliers have signed on as the product labeled. Shippers agree to contract terms that appear on the back of the receipt of air transport, this indicates that the sender has been informed and have agreed to the terms that appear on the back. Receipt of the carriage by air. In addition, the bill transport document refers Mon 3 A. It would appear that the sender is not notified of the selected products to transport goods. The effect of the weight. It is liable to be charged by weight, the report only. The cargo of the ship and the remaining 4 cases, it appeared the receipt of air transport document refers Mon 7 Mon 11 Tue 15 Wed 19 that the sender agrees to send items to the value of the shipment. I believe that the suppliers are aware of and accept liability. Listed on the back of the receipt for the carriage by air, so to hear that the delivery of five already agreed to by the manifest. The liability of the carrier said.

Despite the fact that the suppliers will get all five of them agreed with it. Report on the liability of the carrier. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit, but that all 5 lost because of fraud or gross negligence by the defendant and the defendant either does not express in words exactly. Both defendants deny the claims of the plaintiff in any way. Both defendants admitted the facts as above. If we listen to that all 5 have been lost because of fraud or gross negligence of both defendants. Sue the carrier. The conditions of carriage by air after the receipt of documents which the defendant either l 5, the carrier may be a limitation of liability for their benefit.

Company A and Company B can tell the sender of the delivery to the carrier that the two defendants are each $ 100, both defendants would be liable and the liability of both defendants would be limited. only. Do not over-priced products that meet Section 620 of the sender is A. Then the receipt of goods transport by air north of the documents referred Mon 3 in the declaration did not specify the price to transport it. $ 100 in any way that it can not be both judge and defendant's liability to pay compensation. This is $ 100 or U.S. $ 4404 under Section 620, paragraph two, but this is the Intellectual Property and International Trade Center has issued a decision saying that the shipment of goods in the state. We deliver to the defendant and the defendant's hair, then both are liable to the sender or the consignor in accordance with Section 620, paragraph one of this plaintiff and the defendant's argument, but the two did not appeal. in any way. Both defendants are liable to pay compensation for loss of goods. Said to the plaintiff. The two defendants are not subject to limitation of liability shall apply to the defendant is liable for compensation according to the price.

It represents the excess of power. The practice of allowing a third party has reasonable cause to believe that. It is within the jurisdiction of this agency. That the defendant would be liable as a third party who in good faith in accordance with Section 822 and Section 821.

Supreme Court in 2207/2549.
After receipt of a message stating the number of carriage by air carrier's liability to $ 20 per 1 kg weight on both front air transportation bill would also make the show worth it for transport. For the complete text. It appears that they have entered the English language NVD or non value declare that suppliers have chosen not to show the value of the shipment. Which is equal to the amount of such liability. In addition, the company I represent the product as an air transport document, the receipt of the message M 1, and in us as a company. The company said it would act on behalf of suppliers have agreed on the matter. The liability of the carrier on the back of a receipt for carriage by air express, where l is the binding of m suppliers, it was agreed that the delivery of the carrier's liability is limited by the defendant. Manifest as well. Limitation of liability agreement in a contract of carriage by air shall be bound by the accused shall enjoy the benefits under this Limitation of Liability.

Supreme Court in 7680/2548.
When it appears that the incident was a cargo ship Chalom 155 bags weighing 186 tons from 190 tons and can carry a maximum weight of the debris was taken to the boat landing with the other 4 were in the middle of the river buoys. Marina at the entrance of a vessel or a large cargo ship would be expected to cause large waves. Chalom cargo ship, the ship's rail and ship it by boat from the water no more than an arm when a large wave crashing into the water, it is easy to ship. The boats are tied with four other vessels were banged against each other. Increase the severity of the impact would be greater and easier to ship. Not appear to have the vigilance and prevent the water into the sea when the waves hit. What a big shock. The boat landed on the buoy mooring and cargo up to not overload the truck. Without any special handling precautions to prevent it. This should not prevent the reasonable expectations of those who have a professional shipping. Chalom, even when the ship is sunk. The vessel has the playoffs to tie the boat to the other, it is only to prevent other vessels have been sunk. Not a boat accident prevention. Chalom ship sank and the damage was not caused by force majeure.

Supreme Court in 7690/2547.
Under Section 624 Constitution of the beginning of the age, in the case of lost that. Starting from the date it was delivered. Plaintiff testified that an employee of the company to testify that the sender of the baht. Time has passed and it has been informed by the defendant that the carrier is still unknown. I have missed it. B. For the defendant company to the buyer that the goods or not. Show that the defendant is notified to the Company B, which should deliver the goods.. Wed, Section 624, then the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on August 27, 2544 is less than one year from the date that should be delivered. To terminate the plaintiff's case.

Supreme Court in 5136/2547.
Contract of carriage by air of the terms and conditions of the contract of carriage by air of the show. The English text on both front and back of the receipt by the front of the carriage by air. Text printed on plain that The parties shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of carriage set out in pages and pages. The receipt of the carriage by air, this is a contract of carriage by air. Both products have been known to remark on the limit of liability. Of the carrier as well. Suppliers may increase the liability. Prompted by a higher value and pay more if necessary. Carriage by air and the back of the receipt of such a settlement in the case of suppliers. Does not specify that the value of the goods. The carrier's liability is $ 20 per item weighing 1 kg, which I had signed on behalf of vendors or suppliers as well. Attest that the plaintiff did not refute the facts. I hear that. Perfume products under the contract of carriage by air in this case. Suppliers have agreed to the terms expressly limit the liability of the carrier. The agreement limits the liability of the carrier shall apply to the transport of air in the case when the receipt by air freight shipment that did not value. To transport them. The liability of the carrier for any damage or loss of the goods they are transporting. Transportation is limited to only 20 U.S. dollars per unit weight of the goods have been damaged or lost 1 kg.

Supreme Court in 1920/2546.
When the defendant second contract hire trucking defendant No. 2 shall have the obligation to transport goods to be delivered to the consignee at the airport of destination, the defendant No. 2 has issued a delivery order to be considered as evidence of the shipment to the sender. of lading. Of lading stating that the consignee is a C Citibank, who'll notice the second defendant was transporting the goods to deliver to the Miami International Airport Rd at the destination airport. The original expropriation of lading which Citibank has endorsed them. When a product reaches the airport in Miami. Representatives of the two defendants to return the goods to third parties without the expropriation of the original air waybill. Is not as quick delivery.
Transport is the only carpet product. This is a common thing to carry around is not as valuable as other than bank notes, bills, bonds Egintagtra Pratwnsincga debenture stock certificates and jewelry, according to Section 620 paragraph one.

Supreme Court in 2843/2546.
The plaintiff and the defendant, a carrier who will agree to keep freight costs and the second from the buyer at destination. It is agreed that in cases where the plaintiff charged the cost of Part 2 of the buyer at the destination is not. The plaintiff claims the right to remove from the defendant. The delivery did not specify the amount of freight to and do not have any conditions that, if a buyer does not, then the plaintiff is entitled to take from the defendant. When the plaintiff against the defendant as a party to the contract of carriage by air directly. The plaintiff sued the defendant as a party liable for the freight costs. That have not been paid.

Supreme Court in 9335/2544.
Lading showing that the name of the consignee. According to the instructions of the bank. Bank Card. Lading was endorsed to the Bank Ltd., which is endorsed by the delivery to the plaintiff. The rear of lading showing that the endorsement by a bank, either. And signed by the competent authorities of both banks. There is also a named plaintiff was endorsed by the recipient. The plaintiff shall be considered as endorsing the final consignee. Although not shown in any of lading as the consignee. As noted in the fall of lading the consignee and not fall to the sender. Sender does not endorse the transfer of rights specified in the consignment note to others, so that no list of authorized suppliers of May, so do not make an endorsement of the call.

Act on the carriage of goods by sea, as section 58 of the carrier is liable in the event that the carrier has been assigned to. Lost or damaged. In whole or in part. This means that the liability in case of loss or damage to the carrier. Submit assignments. The defendant in that case the carrier refuses delivery to the plaintiff, the consignee is delivered to the purchasers of such a person who is not named in the application. Consignee that the consignee. No case of lost or damaged by such provisions. Since this means loss of vision is not in the carrier will deliver it. Consignee under the contract.

Supreme Court in 5527/2543.
The meaning of the phrase. "Sent to the carrier, various successive" under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 618 requires that each person who is involved with the goods or the transport is responsible for direct import of goods from one place to another with the carriage. Send a period ranging from origin to destination. Alone, but a representative of any carrier oil, one for the transaction. Documentation about the product. The customs formalities to bring the ship into port. The entrance to the cargo ship's owner to receive the goods. Only appeared to be involved with the shipment. It may not be representative of such vessels are engaged by various successive transport.

Supreme Court in 6471/2541.
Those duties and liabilities arising from transactions between the plaintiff is in effect. The sale of the company. The buyer can have any effect on the defendant which The hair is not. Defendant to the plaintiff's contract of carriage, on December 7, 2534 and the Act on the carriage of marine applications. Fri 2534 has not yet come into force. If necessary the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Title 3 of 8 Section 1 shall apply as a law similar to that in Section 4, Section 612 and 613 are provided to form and hence do waybill and that the consignment note. The law has been forced to make an invoice, and delivery is always on the go, but if you are making a delivery to be provided by law. Clear that The carrier and the consignee must be how well it's going to be. This is in accordance with Section 615 of the Act. If the consignment note to the person that is authorized to be on the expropriation of the leaves. Consignor or consignee to provide appropriate insurance, so when she got out of lading to the plaintiff. This product and the defendant sent to the company. By the Company. Can not surrender the visa. Furnished to the defendant. Or provide appropriate insurance. Moreover, no statement of the plaintiff, as stated in the consignment note. When a defendant violates the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 615 case is a breach of contract. The plaintiff sued the defendant as the plaintiff, the defendant shall carry product liability claim. Because defendant failed to comply with the contract of carriage. Delivered to the company disputes. The buyer, the company does not surrender the consignor a plaintiff has been damaged. It is the plaintiff sued the defendant as a party to damages due to failure. Agreement is a case where the plaintiff alleged that the defendants disputed the plaintiff's rights. The plaintiff sued the defendant shall have the authority under the Code of Civil Procedure section 55, the plaintiff did not sue in the defendant's liability for the loss or damage. Or delayed. It is against the defendants. Breach of contract damages if the plaintiff is not subject to one year under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 624, but the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.

Supreme Court in 1031/2539.
The maritime transport of goods from abroad, Soi contract to Thailand. However, there are no stores in the country. The first defendant to act on behalf of the move. The ship's cargo shipping lines. C fires. Cause some damage. Damaged goods must be held in Hong Kong as a defendant in writing with specific reference to the boat, use a rule of general average. The average insurance company Lloyd's limited stock of the consignee to the rule that guarantees an average of one. Limited number of insurers and ask them to sign a form of collateral. Average, and guarantees. When the ship arrived in the defendant is informed that a ship from the Marine Department and the Port Authority of Thailand to inform the Department. Customs that the goods carried on board what. The newspaper declared that the consignee to take delivery was in exchange for the release. The defendant's product. One is out to get the goods from the warehouses of the Port Authority of Thailand, the first defendant as the freight transport from the consignee. Are responsible for all cargo on board, stored in a warehouse. When a cargo ship can not sail through the mouth of the river to find the defendant, a barge was unloading goods. The operation of such a defendant as a means of carriage by sea. A common carrier. Furthermore The defendant, a newspaper announced that the consignee to take delivery was in exchange for the release. The defendant, an order is issued in order to receive goods from the warehouse of the Port Authority of Thailand. Is an important step of the application of carriage. P.p. Section 615 and Section 622 is a defendant in various successive carriers under Section 618 is liable to the plaintiff.

When a cargo ship carrying more weight. Can not come into the mouth of the river has been accused of a given defendant, the second is taken from a cargo ship from Ko Si Chang to Bangkok, accused the two had hired the defendants 4 and 5, taken by the defendant, 3. I drive a small boat had 2, 4 and 5 is the operator of the cargo from ship to ship, and then kept in the warehouse, it held that the defendant, 2, 4 and 5 is the co-carrier disputes. The first defendant to transport goods to buyers in the final period. Be liable to the plaintiff.

The third defendant is the only employee of the defendant, 4 and 5, which is a co-defendant third parties goods they would not co-transport .

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More