Section 521 provides that a person is the agreement to transfer its assets to another person With affection the recipient and the recipient accepts the property.
Section 522 of the debt with the recipient. Or by which the debt was outstanding.
Section 523 provides that it will be completed upon delivery of the property.
Section 524 of the right to a written instrument that is important. If instruments are not delivered to the recipient. And did not have notice of the debtor's rights. He said that would not be complete.
Section 525 of the asset that is traded must be in writing and registered with the competent authority. He said it has completed writing and registered with the competent authority. In such a case. It shall be completed without the need to deliver the service.
Section 526 if the property or the property pledged to the letter and then registered by the competent authority. And the property is not delivered to the recipient that the recipient would like to remember you are called to surrender the property or the price of the property. I do not like to be one of the claims by another.
Section 527 If a person is bound to repay that debt now and you shall be suspended on the giving or receiving end to the death. Unless the contrary intention appears, but a debt.
Section 528 provides that if the property has a responsibility And the neglect of non-payment sale, gem. He noted that the terms of the reciprocal right to terminate the contract between the provider will deliver the asset recovery provisions to the overnight Should be in luck that. To the extent that such assets should be used to pay for the sale,.
But I would never claim to be. If a party is entitled to demand the sale, pay for it.
Section 529 if the property is not enough to pay for your sale, remember that the recipient must pay only the price of the property only.
Section 530 provides that if an obligation You know who is liable for defects or to pay the same vendor. But not limited to the amount of responsibility
Section 531 is to be withdrawn because of the behavior, you may be ungrateful, but just in case, to say the following.
(1) If the recipient is guilty of violence against serious crime under the Criminal Code or
(2) If the recipient has a bad reputation. Or defamation to serious or
(3) If the recipient does not reject the necessities of life to the service provider. In time, the poor and the recipient can make it.
Section 532 of the heirs may demand the withdrawal of the offer, but only on the grounds that the killing was a deliberate and unlawful. Or barriers to prevent the withdrawal of the offer.
But the prosecution has no legitimate place. Successor to the lawsuits that the next time.
Section 533 on the event to forgive the act, then reject it. Or when time has passed, then six months from the end, so that a person who likes to call them to withdraw it. You may find it to be withdrawn.
In addition, you shall not be filed after the expiration of ten years after such an event.
Section 534 on the withdrawal. He returned to the property under the provisions of this Code. The Should be in luck.
Section 535 provides that the following will be discussed. Will be withdrawn because it is not ungrateful.
(1) shall pay a real premium.
(2) provides that the obligation
(3) by the previous Justice ethics.
(4) in marriage.
Section 536 of which will be effective on the death. You have to enforce the law on inheritance and wills.
Supreme Court to 485/2553.
Even in the upper part of the document will be labeled. "The Testament", but no two witnesses to sign the certification. It is a testament to the law. And such books that I have l or. Had given 15 acres of land around the temple of Wat Phong Phong in the last year has laid the foundation stone to build the temple of the ... The Nor Sor 3 has presented a document that has been lost from Wat Phong in 2525, and the track was found and in the name of my address. I would like this letter to confirm the offer and, if such land. I passed the phone book is a testament to the confirmation of his hand. Ownership to the temple to Phong. The text in a document such as a confirmation for the land dispute. The plaintiff in the present book, which has until now made that if the deceased was still standing. The land dispute, the defendant lean. Books, such as a letter of intent confirming that L is intended to dispute the plaintiff's land, far from the facts, so I do not think l have raised the disputed land to the plaintiff. When the plaintiff entered into an interest in land disputes and land disputes are Earth Sangha.
Supreme Court to 607/2552.
Defendant tendered the disputed land which is land that has hit the Certificate. Land dispute the debt and deliver to the plaintiff without a written and registered. Officials would not include Section 456 and Section 525 paragraph one of the disputed land, but possession with intent to hold that the defendant did not take hold. Land disputes continue to hold. When the plaintiff to take possession of the land is disputed. The plaintiff shall be entitled to possession under Section 1377 and 1378, which has legal possession by possession. Not acquired under the contract give The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the defendant to register the transfer of land disputes as a complainant.
Supreme Court in 4475/2551.
Plaintiff and defendant are brothers with the same parents. The transfer of land to the defendant the plaintiff disputes. Redeem the land dispute in return for the defendant that the plaintiff owes the bank. As for what is responsibility The plaintiff is not entitled to withdraw the ungrateful conduct of the defendant because Section 535 (2) The contract must state that the land By affection no compensation. Defendants have the right to bring witnesses to the party that promises to provide land. The sale, worth it. I will withdraw the lawsuit. No action to enforce or not enforce the agreement. It is therefore not attest to modify the document. This will Civil Code Procedure prohibited by Section 94 (b).
Supreme Court to 10243/2550.
Land disputes are the property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1474 (a) the plaintiff on May. Which the defendant is also included. The plaintiff has the right to request to sign their own land in dispute under section 1475, but even if the plaintiff does not request it. But dealing with the disputed land under section 1476 (a) to (8) have to deal with or the consent of the other party on May. Land dispute to the defendant by the plaintiff's consent. Held that the plaintiff is the plaintiff under Section 521 with the power to withdraw the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs and May. The affection on land disputed by the defendant from 2528 to May 2536. Death. The cause of the ungrateful behavior occurs after April 2543. Death already. Only the plaintiff and the defendant is ungrateful behavior. The plaintiff is entitled to withdraw because of his ungrateful recipients only in its parts.
Supreme Court to 980/2550.
Plaintiff's illness to seek help from the defendant. Defendants are not happy with that. I reply to your dog. Welcome back and forth like children, be childish I have no morals. Where was I going to die. Regarded as a serious defamation plaintiff. Because of the defendant that the plaintiff has withdrawn his ingratitude to the Section 531 (2).
Supreme Court in 6962/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for only five plots of land to the defendant by affection. Later, in late 2538 to early 2539 the defendant act with ingratitude and slander the plaintiff as a parent scolding a serious force for the withdrawal of land plots from the five defendants. The defendant testified that. The defendant has not done so. Cause of this lawsuit. If such an event as the plaintiff's case actually occurred. The plaintiff sued to terminate the go. The testimony of the defendant does not specify how long the statute as a defense against it. The plaintiff sued the defendant's request to withdraw because of his ungrateful only one which, according to the Civil and Commercial Law and the withdrawal of all ages in the same manner as provided under Section 533 only. The defendant has expressly rejected the defendants in the notice of claim in the complaint, the plaintiff and the defendant to show cause of the decline and terminate the lawsuit to show why. To terminate the plaintiff's testimony of the defendant with the P.wi.p. Section 177 paragraph two cases is the issue of age.
I reject defendant's conduct and defamation, the plaintiff was in late 2538 to early 2539, however, the plaintiff filed on May 17, 2544 in excess of six months from the date the plaintiff was not aware of them. The plaintiffs sued under Section 533 shall expire.
Supreme Court to 576/2550.
Plaintiffs allege that the defendants because the first indictment that a libel plaintiff to testify that "The plaintiff will also retake the land to try to fool yourself Do not expect to get the property back," This is just a statement not only polite. Not even a libel plaintiff or the plaintiff's reputation in any way. So even if you listen to a statement by the indictment that the defendant actually did not cause the plaintiff has the right to revoke them. Therefore not be ruled by the supreme fact of the plaintiff that the defendants have said that a text heard or not.
The plaintiff sued later that lecture. The land to the defendant after the plaintiff and defendant, a felling of a wood waste and paying the price of rubber and deliberately abandoned the plaintiff did not send it to the plaintiff, or four factors. Plaintiff's residence as a defendant willfully reject plaintiff's conduct since the end of October 2542 the plaintiff has suffered a very serious May be hazardous to life. The defendant, a plaintiff's ability to serve as a defendant, but both can be ignored, neglected. According to the complaint of the plaintiff and the plaintiff can not attest to that. I would reject the plaintiff and a defendant does not allow pets necessities of life to the plaintiff in any way. If it does not cause the plaintiff is entitled to withdraw under Section 531 (3).
Supreme Court in 4377/2549.
Beach. Lift the dispute to the public that it will help. Be registered within three days, but to elevate the public to become fully public. Legal help immediately. The intent without the transfer of rights to the competent official under Section 525 as well as the public land to a sheriff or mayor does not have the stomach. The intended receiver.
The law states that a mortgage is a mortgage agreement. The mortgage or real rights are the rights that any damage to the property mortgaged to others. The prejudice to the rights of the mortgagee in the mortgaged property. The mortgagee must obtain a written consent from the mortgagee. As between the mortgagor and mortgagee. The letter also noted that mortgage. If a mortgage, act or failure to keep promises given to any or all of the mortgagee has the right to call the mortgage debt and the mortgage as soon as the bank mortgagee does not consent, therefore, unenforceable. to give way. Public dispute is paying off.
The plaintiff sued the defendant in the lawsuit, a prosecutor in a criminal matter. Into the possession of the land and construction of the public. That people share. Without rights. Court's dismissal of the court, but only that. If the argument is that the matter is public or not. The defendant, a use of the land to others to fill in the dispute is believed to have rights as a landowner, then it's not enough that a defendant intended to sue the offender. The decision is no decision that any non-public dispute that this case should not be considered the facts as they appear in criminal cases under Section 46 Civil Code Procedure.
Supreme Court in 2430/2548.
The plaintiff entered into the land to the defendant, a daughter. The plaintiff claims that defendants divided the land to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed a lecture in October 2540 when the defendant said to plaintiff that his anger. The defendant did not transfer land to the plaintiff because the plaintiff and the defendant has raised the land. I can not actually go to court to disbelieve the plaintiff's conduct. Request to withdraw the land dispute that the plaintiff give the defendant. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on July 31, 2541 at which time the six-month Passed away to which Section 533 shall be filed to withdraw because of the ungrateful conduct it. Must be filed within six months from the ungrateful behavior is known to a person like that. Will be withdrawn and thus terminate the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court in 1456/2548.
According to the complaint of the plaintiff. The counterclaim of the defendant and the five. Counterclaim against the plaintiff's statement to the argument that the disputed land belongs to the parties. Plaintiff or the defendant five. When the plaintiff and the defendant accepted the fact that all five cases the cause is due. Plaintiff's land to the defendant one would have suspected the fact that the plaintiff's land to the defendant at the first one to get into trouble in the fact that the land dispute as a plaintiff or defendant, and five because of the fact that I was that the plaintiff did not provide. land disputes, land disputes and a defendant is the plaintiff, the Court determined that the new dispute. Plaintiff or the defendant disputes the five land owners are correct.
The book is divided according to the Nor Sor 3 land and I will state clearly that the plaintiff and the defendant said to the Nor Sor 3 land based on an area of 3 and 60 meters on the first possession of the defendant the benefit. in a land dispute and that the plaintiff was not at all. Argue against. The defendant, a top official in the land surveying for the land. The plaintiff was aware of and approved the landowner's boundary, even at that time. Plaintiffs are not aware that the defendant first sought out a plot of land with an area regardless. But it is clear that the wording specified in the Land Surveyors of the defendant to a plaintiff that is correct. Does not transgress the boundary line in any way. The plaintiff admits that defendant is an occupier of the land that has been given. And surveying the land in the possession of the benefit. It is a land with the delivery of land for a defendant with the intent to follow the award in the possession of more than specified in the letter. Nor Sor 3 land and promises to be surveying the land, so when there is an area of 99 square acres of land I have to assume the plaintiff and the defendant in such an area. 3 and 60 square wah of land for use as specified in the contract divided the land and Miss 3.
Supreme Court in 8306/2548.
Because of the land due to a conflict between the defendant and the plaintiff is an anger that he and two other defendants, a distant relative with a vulgar word. "We do not need to complicate matters for me slut. I would like the slut ", which by the nature of things that people like it. The words are polite and do not deserve the defendant would say to the plaintiff No. 1 and 2, but still could not hear it means that the defendant intentionally defame the plaintiff and five seriously, which is why his ungrateful for the plaintiff, the five waste. ever. The five plaintiffs was not sufficient to cause the withdrawal of the land.
Supreme Court in 2304/2548.
The plaintiff is the father accused of a land dispute raised by the defendant that an affection by her house to live in the land. The defendant drove the plaintiff to demolish a house out of land disputes. The plaintiff said that he said, "I believe that the demolition of my home away from land. Do not go away for a home loan. I dismantled the house to a beggar at the temple of it "and that he was the plaintiff. "My father and I even do not respect his father to" Also, when the plaintiff sued the defendants 1 to criminal charges of misappropriation of funds from the sale of land, the plaintiff deposited with the defendant, a defendant No. 1 and 2, it takes them to that plaintiff. The defendant threatened the plaintiff by saying that a withdrawal of criminal charges. Otherwise, the defendant would kill them both plaintiff and defendant, a plaintiff can misuse that. "I believe that to demolish the house away from me" and said that it landed. "I can sell it to someone else. I do hope to hear back from me that "condemnation of the defendant that a plaintiff with the words and the circumstances mentioned above. I respect the fact that a plaintiff's fear of the father. The humiliation and treachery to the patron. Regarded as a serious defamation plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to withdraw because the defendant an ungrateful act as Section 531 (2) the testimony of witnesses, the plaintiff does not specify that he plaintiff when a defendant. It is not even made the essence of the plaintiff's evidence can not be.
The second defendant agreed to acquire the disputed land from the defendant, but to allow a defendant to a dispute over land claimed by the prosecution that he was still the same. It indicates that the second defendant that the defendant already knows that a land dispute with the plaintiff, having already been purchased. This should be purchased in bad faith. And the fact that the two defendants still living with their parents. And there is no reason to buy the land dispute was left with no benefits. Circumstances, to transfer the land dispute between the two defendants to act with knowledge. That the plaintiff in a position as a creditor and as a disadvantage. It is plaintiff's fraud conspiracy. The plaintiff has the right to revoke the transfer of documents between the 1st and 2nd defendants.
Supreme Court in 3614/2547.
Beach. And I dispute that the land yet. The mother of the plaintiff, even if it is incomplete because not in writing and registered with the employee's duties under Section 525 does not appear to be disputing the possession of land disputes. pharmacist. individuals and pharmacist. land dispute with the owner to have been raised throughout the plaintiff's death, the child was possessed by a spirit of peace and openly. Contact the owner for over 10 years, the plaintiff has title to the land dispute in accordance with Section 1382, so that I devise their own land and property disputes, not to the defendant and the like.
Supreme Court in 3866/2547.
The plaintiff in the complaint is ใhgodiesneha. And asked to withdraw because of his ungrateful. But consider the facts in the plaintiff to the defendant to obtain a loan, a son of the Nor Sor 3 Kor dispute to the mortgage. When a mortgage loan, then transfer it back to Nor Sor 3 Kor plaintiff. If it's not ใhgodiesneha pursuant to Section 521 of the plaintiff is the owner of land disputes. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants conduct was ungrateful and did not withdraw the offer. But will sue to recover any other reason that match the facts. When the plaintiff is that the indictment was withdrawn because of his ungrateful. The Supreme Court ruled that the defendants are not to be transferred to the Nor Sor 3 Kor land dispute back to the plaintiff because it is beyond reason. According to the indictment issue.
The plaintiff in the complaint, the grounds that the plaintiff raised. Land disputes raised by the defendant as a condition for the defendant to apply. Mortgage debt as collateral for loans from the banks of the defendant with her husband and attest to such conditions so that the cause of the plaintiff to the defendant the land dispute. We are not truncated or changed in any way to land the contract.
The judges will be forced to conform to the plaint. Plaintiff or the law relating to public order. When listening to the fact that the plaintiff, the defendant borrowed the document Nor Sor 3 Kor land rights to the mortgage. It is not intended for land disputes to the defendant. If not ใhgodiesneha to withdraw because of his ungrateful. Appeal Court judge has the power to raise the Civil Code Prodecure Section 142 (5) and Section 246.
Supreme Court in 5126/2545.
Although the defendant claimed that a person who testified in court in July for your listening room, which is considered a breach of regulations. But when the testimony of A. There is no reason to obey. The court will hear the testimony of the Ministry for consideration under the second paragraph of section 114 Civil Code Prodecure.
Both attest to the defendant that the plaintiff's registration. Both defendants disputed land to the defendant on the occasion of the marriage to be used. Make a living for my family to serve as proof that future changes to the document. Evidence of registration stating that the By affection not. It will serve as proof that the motive of the plaintiff and the defendant disputed land. Both as to any occasion. Both defendants are eligible to serve as proof.
The defendant disputes the plaintiff's land, both in marriage, so that the two defendants to the plaintiff or not, ungrateful behavior. The plaintiff filed a request to withdraw the Section 535 (4) is not.
Supreme Court in 3421/2545.
B. The plaintiff is the wife of the owner of the land dispute. Without Bor married after the death. The plaintiff was a land dispute on their own all along. B. The defendant's brother did not come with it. Later the plaintiff possession of land rights to the holders of a valid registration. But officials could not operate because the plaintiff is not married to B. It is recommended that the plaintiff by the defendant's request for transfer, inheritance, land disputes, land disputes, transfer of B, then the defendant to the plaintiff later. This is incorrect because the land dispute is the estate of B, then the defendant a letter to the plaintiff prior to registration of the disputed land. Heritage is not promise to transfer land I promise that no one need be in writing and registered. Officials under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 526, therefore, that the defendant shall file an application with the competent authority, thus the inheritance of land disputes. The promise it made to the plaintiff. Defendant to transfer the disputed land to the plaintiff under the agreement.
Supreme Court in 9854/2544.
People who like to sue the withdrawal of the reason for the ungrateful behavior. Must be filed within six months from the ungrateful behavior is known to him. And prohibiting the prosecution at the expiration of ten years after the events of that year. Civil and Commercial Code Section 533 provisions of the law is not the right choice to be filed within six months or ten years.
Even those who make a living and poverty. Recipients are required to provide the necessary care and the provider. Can at any time to be alive. But all the ungrateful behavior occurs when counting to sue for more than six months. Date to be informed of those reasons. To terminate the case according to Section 533 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 8655/2544.
Plaintiffs have raised the land to the defendant. The defendant did not behave well. Gambling and booze Plaintiffs are correct. I had not listened to the plaintiff that "the dog lady said I was going to do it. I do not respect me as a mother of a "violent and vulgar words, which is comparable to the plaintiff and the taunting of animals to death, the plaintiff and the defendant used the wood to hit the plaintiff. The defendants in the United States ought to be done to the plaintiff, who is the mother. Actions of the defendant to the plaintiff's reputation is defamatory to the plaintiff that he would force the plaintiff to withdraw the offer. Because the defendant's conduct as ungrateful to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 531 (2).
Supreme Court in 8530/2544.
Despite promises to the defendant in the equipment and the plaintiff says. The defendant agreed to transfer the equipment to the plaintiff from the date the contract and the plaintiff took delivery of equipment and such equipment. But the fact that the defendant did not contract the delivery of radio. Transport and equipment to the plaintiff, so it promises to be contrary to Section 523 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which stipulates that. To be completed upon delivery of the property. Agreement is not perfect. As with the equipment lease between the defendant and the plaintiff. Performed on the same day. When the plaintiff does not deliver the leased property to the defendant to apply. The defendants agreed in the contract will include a statement that the equipment and the equipment installed at the agency of the defendant. Because the lease is not completely contrary to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 546 which stipulates that the lessor must deliver the property and rent it in a good repair. The plaintiff has no right to demand the rent. The defendant shall recover damages and radio equipment.
Supreme Court in 3601/2542.
Plaintiff to recover the money from land disputes to Rama Rama by the Certificate held as security for a defendant to pay plaintiff the amount of 70,000 baht and the Certificate back. The plaintiff then sought out land disputes, land disputes and the building listed for $ 500,000 with an affection for the defendant without compensation. When comparing the price of land disputes over the amount of the defendant an obligation of the plaintiff on 3 to 4 years ago, no fewer than seven times the plaintiff to land disputes, it is not a retirement stipend is true that the defendant that a settlement of land disputes and the HMS Certificate held by a registered mortgage. Not the case with the burden on the land dispute. The disputed land is not for sale, what is not allowed to reject a defendant to the plaintiff money to buy medicines for the repudiation, which does not allow things to remember. Life is a party to the plaintiff at the plaintiff and the defendant broke that one can give it. Plaintiffs have withdrawn their request to meet Section 531 (3).
Registration of the disputed land to the plaintiff by the defendant that an affection for the land dispute is a private property of a defendant under Section 1471 (3) the plaintiff has sued the authority to withdraw from the defendant, but only one. alone.
Supreme Court in 7872/2542.
According to Section 146 of property adjacent to the land or adjacent to the temporary housing is not considered. Combined with the land or house. Of this Article shall apply to house or other buildings which have Land rights are the rights of others, building on the land with the land which I have the right to lease state land disputes in the home. State land. I do not dispute the acquisition of land vested in state.
The registration of transfer of state land. Of persons who are entitled to other government officials. Looking for the registration of the property does. The transfer of the disputed house, the property must comply with Section 456, 525, Section 71 of the grade of land is to be registered for the official to the disputed land under the house, so I transferred to land. The state still holds a leasehold does not raise them. I do not dispute it in writing and registered by the competent authority. Law. The dispute raises the house is not complete. No dispute that the house was transferred to the transferee.
Supreme Court in 6657/2542.
The defendant would be responsible for providing land to the plaintiff for all three. The plaintiff in exchange for the termination of the lease allowed three minutes in and out of the lease. Reciprocal agreement that is enforceable. This is not the case under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 521 ใhgodiesneha do not have to comply with Section 525 and the 526 agreement to provide land to the defendant. There is no law to require the documents show. The plaintiffs, all three parties to the Hearing the intent of the agreement to transfer. Ownership of land. It is forbidden to listen to as the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 94.
Supreme Court to 480/2539.
The Foundation is an entity that has a foundation that has been already registered as legal entities. When we get to the foundation, the transferee is not a legal entity shall be deemed to give. The mistake in the transfer of the material to the legal acts to make void. Defendant No. 1 and 2, which is the official who received it under the Code. Section 61 will cancel the registration of land transactions and the need for the transfer. According to the prosecution to withdraw the Civil and Commercial Code with. Withdraw before it.
Supreme Court in 5212/2537.
The car, which will complete the delivery of movable property to follow. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 523 provides that no law shall be made in the form of property ownership in the car. Vehicles are transferred to the receiver, the plaintiff must, before the transfer is not The law on registered vehicles is about the will. Controlled vehicles and motor vehicle tax Is not a legal act in any way. Even so, it changed its name in the register as a plaintiff, the plaintiff's car. Car owner drivers in the event that the plaintiff has the power to take legal action against the plaintiff. The violation of the defendant.
Supreme Court in 1516/2525.
Land disputes the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff, who is registered as a usufruct for life of the plaintiff. Then she got into farming land that has been raised. And the paddy. From the farm to the plaintiff 30 per barrel for the year as this would cause a burden on the plaintiff's land for the life of the plaintiff. It is thus not ใhgodiesneha. It is a precious responsibility Legal relationship between the provider and the recipient must follow the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 528529 to the withdrawal of the plaintiff because the defendant did not act ungrateful.
Supreme Court in 1764/2498.
Husband and wife are doing the will of the parties. Will's wife says. "When I succumb to. Those are my property and rights which are available at this time and continue later to become the ownership rights of the husband (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) heir Khun Pong, but if any of the deceased passed away before I could ask the property and rights. I have a vested to the plaintiff. (Lady's Wanich number) is the heiress, etc. "And the wills of her husband. (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) have a similar The property to his wife (Ms. Chan) if she passed away Monday, before the property went to the plaintiff. (Lady Wanich number, etc.).
When the wife. (Ms. Chan) died before The estate of his wife (Ms. Chan) would fall on her husband (Khun Pong equipment), as testament to her husband, shall have the right to raise assets for others. There is no legal obligation on the husband (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) require the property to the plaintiff. The property belongs to the husband (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) is strictly prohibited by law, the husband has the right to raise one's assets can then devise the property to others does not comply with agreed with his wife. Whether any plaintiff. It is an exercise in bad faith because the covenant not to listen to them very simply that. A testament both to the plaintiff agreed to raise property at death. I do not like to devise a Section 536 was not applicable. And this raises the same property as the will is not a party. A third party agree to pay accordingly. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 374.
Obligation to include a plaintiff's property was not enforceable because contrary to Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1707 (Meeting No. 24/2498).
Section 522 of the debt with the recipient. Or by which the debt was outstanding.
Section 523 provides that it will be completed upon delivery of the property.
Section 524 of the right to a written instrument that is important. If instruments are not delivered to the recipient. And did not have notice of the debtor's rights. He said that would not be complete.
Section 525 of the asset that is traded must be in writing and registered with the competent authority. He said it has completed writing and registered with the competent authority. In such a case. It shall be completed without the need to deliver the service.
Section 526 if the property or the property pledged to the letter and then registered by the competent authority. And the property is not delivered to the recipient that the recipient would like to remember you are called to surrender the property or the price of the property. I do not like to be one of the claims by another.
Section 527 If a person is bound to repay that debt now and you shall be suspended on the giving or receiving end to the death. Unless the contrary intention appears, but a debt.
Section 528 provides that if the property has a responsibility And the neglect of non-payment sale, gem. He noted that the terms of the reciprocal right to terminate the contract between the provider will deliver the asset recovery provisions to the overnight Should be in luck that. To the extent that such assets should be used to pay for the sale,.
But I would never claim to be. If a party is entitled to demand the sale, pay for it.
Section 529 if the property is not enough to pay for your sale, remember that the recipient must pay only the price of the property only.
Section 530 provides that if an obligation You know who is liable for defects or to pay the same vendor. But not limited to the amount of responsibility
Section 531 is to be withdrawn because of the behavior, you may be ungrateful, but just in case, to say the following.
(1) If the recipient is guilty of violence against serious crime under the Criminal Code or
(2) If the recipient has a bad reputation. Or defamation to serious or
(3) If the recipient does not reject the necessities of life to the service provider. In time, the poor and the recipient can make it.
Section 532 of the heirs may demand the withdrawal of the offer, but only on the grounds that the killing was a deliberate and unlawful. Or barriers to prevent the withdrawal of the offer.
But the prosecution has no legitimate place. Successor to the lawsuits that the next time.
Section 533 on the event to forgive the act, then reject it. Or when time has passed, then six months from the end, so that a person who likes to call them to withdraw it. You may find it to be withdrawn.
In addition, you shall not be filed after the expiration of ten years after such an event.
Section 534 on the withdrawal. He returned to the property under the provisions of this Code. The Should be in luck.
Section 535 provides that the following will be discussed. Will be withdrawn because it is not ungrateful.
(1) shall pay a real premium.
(2) provides that the obligation
(3) by the previous Justice ethics.
(4) in marriage.
Section 536 of which will be effective on the death. You have to enforce the law on inheritance and wills.
Supreme Court to 485/2553.
Even in the upper part of the document will be labeled. "The Testament", but no two witnesses to sign the certification. It is a testament to the law. And such books that I have l or. Had given 15 acres of land around the temple of Wat Phong Phong in the last year has laid the foundation stone to build the temple of the ... The Nor Sor 3 has presented a document that has been lost from Wat Phong in 2525, and the track was found and in the name of my address. I would like this letter to confirm the offer and, if such land. I passed the phone book is a testament to the confirmation of his hand. Ownership to the temple to Phong. The text in a document such as a confirmation for the land dispute. The plaintiff in the present book, which has until now made that if the deceased was still standing. The land dispute, the defendant lean. Books, such as a letter of intent confirming that L is intended to dispute the plaintiff's land, far from the facts, so I do not think l have raised the disputed land to the plaintiff. When the plaintiff entered into an interest in land disputes and land disputes are Earth Sangha.
Supreme Court to 607/2552.
Defendant tendered the disputed land which is land that has hit the Certificate. Land dispute the debt and deliver to the plaintiff without a written and registered. Officials would not include Section 456 and Section 525 paragraph one of the disputed land, but possession with intent to hold that the defendant did not take hold. Land disputes continue to hold. When the plaintiff to take possession of the land is disputed. The plaintiff shall be entitled to possession under Section 1377 and 1378, which has legal possession by possession. Not acquired under the contract give The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the defendant to register the transfer of land disputes as a complainant.
Supreme Court in 4475/2551.
Plaintiff and defendant are brothers with the same parents. The transfer of land to the defendant the plaintiff disputes. Redeem the land dispute in return for the defendant that the plaintiff owes the bank. As for what is responsibility The plaintiff is not entitled to withdraw the ungrateful conduct of the defendant because Section 535 (2) The contract must state that the land By affection no compensation. Defendants have the right to bring witnesses to the party that promises to provide land. The sale, worth it. I will withdraw the lawsuit. No action to enforce or not enforce the agreement. It is therefore not attest to modify the document. This will Civil Code Procedure prohibited by Section 94 (b).
Supreme Court to 10243/2550.
Land disputes are the property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1474 (a) the plaintiff on May. Which the defendant is also included. The plaintiff has the right to request to sign their own land in dispute under section 1475, but even if the plaintiff does not request it. But dealing with the disputed land under section 1476 (a) to (8) have to deal with or the consent of the other party on May. Land dispute to the defendant by the plaintiff's consent. Held that the plaintiff is the plaintiff under Section 521 with the power to withdraw the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs and May. The affection on land disputed by the defendant from 2528 to May 2536. Death. The cause of the ungrateful behavior occurs after April 2543. Death already. Only the plaintiff and the defendant is ungrateful behavior. The plaintiff is entitled to withdraw because of his ungrateful recipients only in its parts.
Supreme Court to 980/2550.
Plaintiff's illness to seek help from the defendant. Defendants are not happy with that. I reply to your dog. Welcome back and forth like children, be childish I have no morals. Where was I going to die. Regarded as a serious defamation plaintiff. Because of the defendant that the plaintiff has withdrawn his ingratitude to the Section 531 (2).
Supreme Court in 6962/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for only five plots of land to the defendant by affection. Later, in late 2538 to early 2539 the defendant act with ingratitude and slander the plaintiff as a parent scolding a serious force for the withdrawal of land plots from the five defendants. The defendant testified that. The defendant has not done so. Cause of this lawsuit. If such an event as the plaintiff's case actually occurred. The plaintiff sued to terminate the go. The testimony of the defendant does not specify how long the statute as a defense against it. The plaintiff sued the defendant's request to withdraw because of his ungrateful only one which, according to the Civil and Commercial Law and the withdrawal of all ages in the same manner as provided under Section 533 only. The defendant has expressly rejected the defendants in the notice of claim in the complaint, the plaintiff and the defendant to show cause of the decline and terminate the lawsuit to show why. To terminate the plaintiff's testimony of the defendant with the P.wi.p. Section 177 paragraph two cases is the issue of age.
I reject defendant's conduct and defamation, the plaintiff was in late 2538 to early 2539, however, the plaintiff filed on May 17, 2544 in excess of six months from the date the plaintiff was not aware of them. The plaintiffs sued under Section 533 shall expire.
Supreme Court to 576/2550.
Plaintiffs allege that the defendants because the first indictment that a libel plaintiff to testify that "The plaintiff will also retake the land to try to fool yourself Do not expect to get the property back," This is just a statement not only polite. Not even a libel plaintiff or the plaintiff's reputation in any way. So even if you listen to a statement by the indictment that the defendant actually did not cause the plaintiff has the right to revoke them. Therefore not be ruled by the supreme fact of the plaintiff that the defendants have said that a text heard or not.
The plaintiff sued later that lecture. The land to the defendant after the plaintiff and defendant, a felling of a wood waste and paying the price of rubber and deliberately abandoned the plaintiff did not send it to the plaintiff, or four factors. Plaintiff's residence as a defendant willfully reject plaintiff's conduct since the end of October 2542 the plaintiff has suffered a very serious May be hazardous to life. The defendant, a plaintiff's ability to serve as a defendant, but both can be ignored, neglected. According to the complaint of the plaintiff and the plaintiff can not attest to that. I would reject the plaintiff and a defendant does not allow pets necessities of life to the plaintiff in any way. If it does not cause the plaintiff is entitled to withdraw under Section 531 (3).
Supreme Court in 4377/2549.
Beach. Lift the dispute to the public that it will help. Be registered within three days, but to elevate the public to become fully public. Legal help immediately. The intent without the transfer of rights to the competent official under Section 525 as well as the public land to a sheriff or mayor does not have the stomach. The intended receiver.
The law states that a mortgage is a mortgage agreement. The mortgage or real rights are the rights that any damage to the property mortgaged to others. The prejudice to the rights of the mortgagee in the mortgaged property. The mortgagee must obtain a written consent from the mortgagee. As between the mortgagor and mortgagee. The letter also noted that mortgage. If a mortgage, act or failure to keep promises given to any or all of the mortgagee has the right to call the mortgage debt and the mortgage as soon as the bank mortgagee does not consent, therefore, unenforceable. to give way. Public dispute is paying off.
The plaintiff sued the defendant in the lawsuit, a prosecutor in a criminal matter. Into the possession of the land and construction of the public. That people share. Without rights. Court's dismissal of the court, but only that. If the argument is that the matter is public or not. The defendant, a use of the land to others to fill in the dispute is believed to have rights as a landowner, then it's not enough that a defendant intended to sue the offender. The decision is no decision that any non-public dispute that this case should not be considered the facts as they appear in criminal cases under Section 46 Civil Code Procedure.
Supreme Court in 2430/2548.
The plaintiff entered into the land to the defendant, a daughter. The plaintiff claims that defendants divided the land to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed a lecture in October 2540 when the defendant said to plaintiff that his anger. The defendant did not transfer land to the plaintiff because the plaintiff and the defendant has raised the land. I can not actually go to court to disbelieve the plaintiff's conduct. Request to withdraw the land dispute that the plaintiff give the defendant. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on July 31, 2541 at which time the six-month Passed away to which Section 533 shall be filed to withdraw because of the ungrateful conduct it. Must be filed within six months from the ungrateful behavior is known to a person like that. Will be withdrawn and thus terminate the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court in 1456/2548.
According to the complaint of the plaintiff. The counterclaim of the defendant and the five. Counterclaim against the plaintiff's statement to the argument that the disputed land belongs to the parties. Plaintiff or the defendant five. When the plaintiff and the defendant accepted the fact that all five cases the cause is due. Plaintiff's land to the defendant one would have suspected the fact that the plaintiff's land to the defendant at the first one to get into trouble in the fact that the land dispute as a plaintiff or defendant, and five because of the fact that I was that the plaintiff did not provide. land disputes, land disputes and a defendant is the plaintiff, the Court determined that the new dispute. Plaintiff or the defendant disputes the five land owners are correct.
The book is divided according to the Nor Sor 3 land and I will state clearly that the plaintiff and the defendant said to the Nor Sor 3 land based on an area of 3 and 60 meters on the first possession of the defendant the benefit. in a land dispute and that the plaintiff was not at all. Argue against. The defendant, a top official in the land surveying for the land. The plaintiff was aware of and approved the landowner's boundary, even at that time. Plaintiffs are not aware that the defendant first sought out a plot of land with an area regardless. But it is clear that the wording specified in the Land Surveyors of the defendant to a plaintiff that is correct. Does not transgress the boundary line in any way. The plaintiff admits that defendant is an occupier of the land that has been given. And surveying the land in the possession of the benefit. It is a land with the delivery of land for a defendant with the intent to follow the award in the possession of more than specified in the letter. Nor Sor 3 land and promises to be surveying the land, so when there is an area of 99 square acres of land I have to assume the plaintiff and the defendant in such an area. 3 and 60 square wah of land for use as specified in the contract divided the land and Miss 3.
Supreme Court in 8306/2548.
Because of the land due to a conflict between the defendant and the plaintiff is an anger that he and two other defendants, a distant relative with a vulgar word. "We do not need to complicate matters for me slut. I would like the slut ", which by the nature of things that people like it. The words are polite and do not deserve the defendant would say to the plaintiff No. 1 and 2, but still could not hear it means that the defendant intentionally defame the plaintiff and five seriously, which is why his ungrateful for the plaintiff, the five waste. ever. The five plaintiffs was not sufficient to cause the withdrawal of the land.
Supreme Court in 2304/2548.
The plaintiff is the father accused of a land dispute raised by the defendant that an affection by her house to live in the land. The defendant drove the plaintiff to demolish a house out of land disputes. The plaintiff said that he said, "I believe that the demolition of my home away from land. Do not go away for a home loan. I dismantled the house to a beggar at the temple of it "and that he was the plaintiff. "My father and I even do not respect his father to" Also, when the plaintiff sued the defendants 1 to criminal charges of misappropriation of funds from the sale of land, the plaintiff deposited with the defendant, a defendant No. 1 and 2, it takes them to that plaintiff. The defendant threatened the plaintiff by saying that a withdrawal of criminal charges. Otherwise, the defendant would kill them both plaintiff and defendant, a plaintiff can misuse that. "I believe that to demolish the house away from me" and said that it landed. "I can sell it to someone else. I do hope to hear back from me that "condemnation of the defendant that a plaintiff with the words and the circumstances mentioned above. I respect the fact that a plaintiff's fear of the father. The humiliation and treachery to the patron. Regarded as a serious defamation plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to withdraw because the defendant an ungrateful act as Section 531 (2) the testimony of witnesses, the plaintiff does not specify that he plaintiff when a defendant. It is not even made the essence of the plaintiff's evidence can not be.
The second defendant agreed to acquire the disputed land from the defendant, but to allow a defendant to a dispute over land claimed by the prosecution that he was still the same. It indicates that the second defendant that the defendant already knows that a land dispute with the plaintiff, having already been purchased. This should be purchased in bad faith. And the fact that the two defendants still living with their parents. And there is no reason to buy the land dispute was left with no benefits. Circumstances, to transfer the land dispute between the two defendants to act with knowledge. That the plaintiff in a position as a creditor and as a disadvantage. It is plaintiff's fraud conspiracy. The plaintiff has the right to revoke the transfer of documents between the 1st and 2nd defendants.
Supreme Court in 3614/2547.
Beach. And I dispute that the land yet. The mother of the plaintiff, even if it is incomplete because not in writing and registered with the employee's duties under Section 525 does not appear to be disputing the possession of land disputes. pharmacist. individuals and pharmacist. land dispute with the owner to have been raised throughout the plaintiff's death, the child was possessed by a spirit of peace and openly. Contact the owner for over 10 years, the plaintiff has title to the land dispute in accordance with Section 1382, so that I devise their own land and property disputes, not to the defendant and the like.
Supreme Court in 3866/2547.
The plaintiff in the complaint is ใhgodiesneha. And asked to withdraw because of his ungrateful. But consider the facts in the plaintiff to the defendant to obtain a loan, a son of the Nor Sor 3 Kor dispute to the mortgage. When a mortgage loan, then transfer it back to Nor Sor 3 Kor plaintiff. If it's not ใhgodiesneha pursuant to Section 521 of the plaintiff is the owner of land disputes. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants conduct was ungrateful and did not withdraw the offer. But will sue to recover any other reason that match the facts. When the plaintiff is that the indictment was withdrawn because of his ungrateful. The Supreme Court ruled that the defendants are not to be transferred to the Nor Sor 3 Kor land dispute back to the plaintiff because it is beyond reason. According to the indictment issue.
The plaintiff in the complaint, the grounds that the plaintiff raised. Land disputes raised by the defendant as a condition for the defendant to apply. Mortgage debt as collateral for loans from the banks of the defendant with her husband and attest to such conditions so that the cause of the plaintiff to the defendant the land dispute. We are not truncated or changed in any way to land the contract.
The judges will be forced to conform to the plaint. Plaintiff or the law relating to public order. When listening to the fact that the plaintiff, the defendant borrowed the document Nor Sor 3 Kor land rights to the mortgage. It is not intended for land disputes to the defendant. If not ใhgodiesneha to withdraw because of his ungrateful. Appeal Court judge has the power to raise the Civil Code Prodecure Section 142 (5) and Section 246.
Supreme Court in 5126/2545.
Although the defendant claimed that a person who testified in court in July for your listening room, which is considered a breach of regulations. But when the testimony of A. There is no reason to obey. The court will hear the testimony of the Ministry for consideration under the second paragraph of section 114 Civil Code Prodecure.
Both attest to the defendant that the plaintiff's registration. Both defendants disputed land to the defendant on the occasion of the marriage to be used. Make a living for my family to serve as proof that future changes to the document. Evidence of registration stating that the By affection not. It will serve as proof that the motive of the plaintiff and the defendant disputed land. Both as to any occasion. Both defendants are eligible to serve as proof.
The defendant disputes the plaintiff's land, both in marriage, so that the two defendants to the plaintiff or not, ungrateful behavior. The plaintiff filed a request to withdraw the Section 535 (4) is not.
Supreme Court in 3421/2545.
B. The plaintiff is the wife of the owner of the land dispute. Without Bor married after the death. The plaintiff was a land dispute on their own all along. B. The defendant's brother did not come with it. Later the plaintiff possession of land rights to the holders of a valid registration. But officials could not operate because the plaintiff is not married to B. It is recommended that the plaintiff by the defendant's request for transfer, inheritance, land disputes, land disputes, transfer of B, then the defendant to the plaintiff later. This is incorrect because the land dispute is the estate of B, then the defendant a letter to the plaintiff prior to registration of the disputed land. Heritage is not promise to transfer land I promise that no one need be in writing and registered. Officials under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 526, therefore, that the defendant shall file an application with the competent authority, thus the inheritance of land disputes. The promise it made to the plaintiff. Defendant to transfer the disputed land to the plaintiff under the agreement.
Supreme Court in 9854/2544.
People who like to sue the withdrawal of the reason for the ungrateful behavior. Must be filed within six months from the ungrateful behavior is known to him. And prohibiting the prosecution at the expiration of ten years after the events of that year. Civil and Commercial Code Section 533 provisions of the law is not the right choice to be filed within six months or ten years.
Even those who make a living and poverty. Recipients are required to provide the necessary care and the provider. Can at any time to be alive. But all the ungrateful behavior occurs when counting to sue for more than six months. Date to be informed of those reasons. To terminate the case according to Section 533 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 8655/2544.
Plaintiffs have raised the land to the defendant. The defendant did not behave well. Gambling and booze Plaintiffs are correct. I had not listened to the plaintiff that "the dog lady said I was going to do it. I do not respect me as a mother of a "violent and vulgar words, which is comparable to the plaintiff and the taunting of animals to death, the plaintiff and the defendant used the wood to hit the plaintiff. The defendants in the United States ought to be done to the plaintiff, who is the mother. Actions of the defendant to the plaintiff's reputation is defamatory to the plaintiff that he would force the plaintiff to withdraw the offer. Because the defendant's conduct as ungrateful to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 531 (2).
Supreme Court in 8530/2544.
Despite promises to the defendant in the equipment and the plaintiff says. The defendant agreed to transfer the equipment to the plaintiff from the date the contract and the plaintiff took delivery of equipment and such equipment. But the fact that the defendant did not contract the delivery of radio. Transport and equipment to the plaintiff, so it promises to be contrary to Section 523 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which stipulates that. To be completed upon delivery of the property. Agreement is not perfect. As with the equipment lease between the defendant and the plaintiff. Performed on the same day. When the plaintiff does not deliver the leased property to the defendant to apply. The defendants agreed in the contract will include a statement that the equipment and the equipment installed at the agency of the defendant. Because the lease is not completely contrary to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 546 which stipulates that the lessor must deliver the property and rent it in a good repair. The plaintiff has no right to demand the rent. The defendant shall recover damages and radio equipment.
Supreme Court in 3601/2542.
Plaintiff to recover the money from land disputes to Rama Rama by the Certificate held as security for a defendant to pay plaintiff the amount of 70,000 baht and the Certificate back. The plaintiff then sought out land disputes, land disputes and the building listed for $ 500,000 with an affection for the defendant without compensation. When comparing the price of land disputes over the amount of the defendant an obligation of the plaintiff on 3 to 4 years ago, no fewer than seven times the plaintiff to land disputes, it is not a retirement stipend is true that the defendant that a settlement of land disputes and the HMS Certificate held by a registered mortgage. Not the case with the burden on the land dispute. The disputed land is not for sale, what is not allowed to reject a defendant to the plaintiff money to buy medicines for the repudiation, which does not allow things to remember. Life is a party to the plaintiff at the plaintiff and the defendant broke that one can give it. Plaintiffs have withdrawn their request to meet Section 531 (3).
Registration of the disputed land to the plaintiff by the defendant that an affection for the land dispute is a private property of a defendant under Section 1471 (3) the plaintiff has sued the authority to withdraw from the defendant, but only one. alone.
Supreme Court in 7872/2542.
According to Section 146 of property adjacent to the land or adjacent to the temporary housing is not considered. Combined with the land or house. Of this Article shall apply to house or other buildings which have Land rights are the rights of others, building on the land with the land which I have the right to lease state land disputes in the home. State land. I do not dispute the acquisition of land vested in state.
The registration of transfer of state land. Of persons who are entitled to other government officials. Looking for the registration of the property does. The transfer of the disputed house, the property must comply with Section 456, 525, Section 71 of the grade of land is to be registered for the official to the disputed land under the house, so I transferred to land. The state still holds a leasehold does not raise them. I do not dispute it in writing and registered by the competent authority. Law. The dispute raises the house is not complete. No dispute that the house was transferred to the transferee.
Supreme Court in 6657/2542.
The defendant would be responsible for providing land to the plaintiff for all three. The plaintiff in exchange for the termination of the lease allowed three minutes in and out of the lease. Reciprocal agreement that is enforceable. This is not the case under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 521 ใhgodiesneha do not have to comply with Section 525 and the 526 agreement to provide land to the defendant. There is no law to require the documents show. The plaintiffs, all three parties to the Hearing the intent of the agreement to transfer. Ownership of land. It is forbidden to listen to as the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 94.
Supreme Court to 480/2539.
The Foundation is an entity that has a foundation that has been already registered as legal entities. When we get to the foundation, the transferee is not a legal entity shall be deemed to give. The mistake in the transfer of the material to the legal acts to make void. Defendant No. 1 and 2, which is the official who received it under the Code. Section 61 will cancel the registration of land transactions and the need for the transfer. According to the prosecution to withdraw the Civil and Commercial Code with. Withdraw before it.
Supreme Court in 5212/2537.
The car, which will complete the delivery of movable property to follow. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 523 provides that no law shall be made in the form of property ownership in the car. Vehicles are transferred to the receiver, the plaintiff must, before the transfer is not The law on registered vehicles is about the will. Controlled vehicles and motor vehicle tax Is not a legal act in any way. Even so, it changed its name in the register as a plaintiff, the plaintiff's car. Car owner drivers in the event that the plaintiff has the power to take legal action against the plaintiff. The violation of the defendant.
Supreme Court in 1516/2525.
Land disputes the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff, who is registered as a usufruct for life of the plaintiff. Then she got into farming land that has been raised. And the paddy. From the farm to the plaintiff 30 per barrel for the year as this would cause a burden on the plaintiff's land for the life of the plaintiff. It is thus not ใhgodiesneha. It is a precious responsibility Legal relationship between the provider and the recipient must follow the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 528529 to the withdrawal of the plaintiff because the defendant did not act ungrateful.
Supreme Court in 1764/2498.
Husband and wife are doing the will of the parties. Will's wife says. "When I succumb to. Those are my property and rights which are available at this time and continue later to become the ownership rights of the husband (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) heir Khun Pong, but if any of the deceased passed away before I could ask the property and rights. I have a vested to the plaintiff. (Lady's Wanich number) is the heiress, etc. "And the wills of her husband. (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) have a similar The property to his wife (Ms. Chan) if she passed away Monday, before the property went to the plaintiff. (Lady Wanich number, etc.).
When the wife. (Ms. Chan) died before The estate of his wife (Ms. Chan) would fall on her husband (Khun Pong equipment), as testament to her husband, shall have the right to raise assets for others. There is no legal obligation on the husband (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) require the property to the plaintiff. The property belongs to the husband (Khun Pong equipment, etc.) is strictly prohibited by law, the husband has the right to raise one's assets can then devise the property to others does not comply with agreed with his wife. Whether any plaintiff. It is an exercise in bad faith because the covenant not to listen to them very simply that. A testament both to the plaintiff agreed to raise property at death. I do not like to devise a Section 536 was not applicable. And this raises the same property as the will is not a party. A third party agree to pay accordingly. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 374.
Obligation to include a plaintiff's property was not enforceable because contrary to Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1707 (Meeting No. 24/2498).
