Section 546 The lessor must deliver the property and rent it in a good repair.
Section 547 tenants have to pay to be necessary and appropriate to maintain the rental property and how much. The lessor must pay to the tenant. Unless the cost of routine maintenance and minor repairs.
Section 548 if the rent for the property which is leased by a state not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Tenants will pay a termination.
Section 549 Delivery of property to rent it. The liability of the lessor in case of defect, and pay the better. The result of the commitment that it will not be liable for these persons to enforce the provisions of this Code dealing with the appropriate provisions.
Article 550 The lessor shall be liable for defects arising during the period of lease. And the landlord must repair everything that they needed. Unless the repair of the laws or customs that the tenant will have to do it.
Section 551 if the defects of the leased property, the tenant must not cause death without the use and benefit. And the lessor to be resolved soon. Notice to the tenant to the landlord to correct defects before. If the lessor and not the reconciled within a reasonable time, the tenant may terminate the contract time. If that defect is fatal to the right to do so.
Supreme Court in 6036/2551.
Road building on disputed land by the defendant against the plaintiff before the land from the plaintiff. The defendant's actions did not violate the plaintiff. But the front right of the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff's lease. The plaintiff is not entitled to sue for infringement of legal action against the defendant.
Supreme Court in 5379/2549.
Captive leasing new vehicles are not registered. Act of plaintiff's vehicle. The defendant had registered the car lease payments to the plaintiff for the plaintiff to proceed to registration. Held that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed that the plaintiff has a registered car hire. After 9 months, the plaintiff has not contracted to perform the registration. The plaintiff is at fault. Deliveries by truck are not suitable to be utilized. The defendant shall have the right to terminate the contract.
Supreme Court in 1471/2548.
Article 4 states that the lease the lessee must maintain the leased property, all of which are in good condition and complete. To repair the wear and tear of normal use it. The agreement gives the tenant is required to reserve a rental property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. Requires little maintenance, and repair provided by Section 553 only. I mean that the lessee will be liable to repair the leased property in every case.
Repair, which is necessary and appropriate to maintain the leased property is in use. It is the duty of the defendant, the lessor under section 547 for use as a routine maintenance and repair, little will fall into the liability of the plaintiff, a tenant, not the defendant, the lessor is the party liable for such repairs. Section 550.
Supreme Court to 312/2541.
The defendant rented a pontoon of steel with the equipment and the Shade of an aircraft in the rental rate per 177,000 and for winch and engine number of a set rate per 7,500 total rent per month and 184,500 baht for rental. Previous use of the leased property with conventional care. And has always been to preserve the leased property that Reply Post Reply preserve their assets. The plaintiff lessor has leased the property back. The leased property has been damaged and worn out. Plaintiff's barge and winch repair the damage. The plaintiff does not attest to the damage caused by the fault of the defendant tenant. We are hearing that the defect is caused by the defendant's use of the leased property by the tenant. Plaintiff, the lessor shall be liable for defects arising during the period of lease. The plaintiff must address all of the repairs required by Section 550, the plaintiff is unable to repair the barge and winch from the defendant.
Supreme Court in 3345/2548.
Contract hire property of either party shall have the right to terminate the agreement in two cases of the contract by one. With the provisions of the law, another under Section 386 is not that when the lease is no requirement that the defendant has the right to terminate the lease. The defendant is not entitled to terminate the contract if they could.
Section 548 defines the duties and responsibilities of the landlord said. If the rent for the property which is leased by a state not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Lessee will pay to terminate the contract or if the fact that the provisions of that law. The defendant shall have the right to terminate the lease to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 409/2548.
When a lease dispute between the plaintiff and defendant to be void. The defendant remains in the dispute further. It is by no right. Despite the violation of the plaintiff's lessor. Any violation of the plaintiff, who leased land, including the disputed matter. But when the plaintiff did not sue the defendant drove out of the dispute would cause the plaintiff has been damaged due to defendant's front right of the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant drove out of the dispute. And damages to the plaintiff's court by asking the landlord to the plaintiff with the plaintiff under Section 477 and Section 549 of the diagnosis. The plaintiff has the power to sue or not to consider the plaintiff's right to exist while the indictment is important.
Supreme Court in 8705/2547.
Although there is no legal relationship between plaintiff and defendant. However, the plaintiff, a tenant disputes the plaintiff's possession of the benefit in dispute was not. The defendant is a tenant of the plaintiff's case and the contract had ended earlier, not out of the dispute shall be entitled to pay the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to the defendant by filing a complaint with the court, the plaintiff was the lessor of the plaintiff to join the Section 477 and 549, the plaintiff has substantially complied with the provisions of such laws. The plaintiff's case was not inserted into the plaintiff's Civil Code Procedure Section 57 (2) When the plaintiff is the plaintiff's consent to a request by the plaintiff. Would have resulted in the plaintiff and the plaintiff sued the defendant.
Supreme Court in 2077/2545.
Measuring the lessor is the owner of commercial building disputes. But the case also in possession of the plaintiff, the second commercial building as a tenant. When the plaintiff, the two had transferred the lease to the plaintiff as a defendant in two, as the transfer of responsibility under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 546 must deliver the property is leased to the plaintiff No. 1 and the contract between the plaintiff and two with The measure remains in force. When the defendants reside in the Town Court by virtue of rights under the sublease agreement made with the plaintiff that two of the plaintiff No. 2 has terminated the sublease agreement and the defendant to the defendant refused the plaintiff No. 2 shall have the power to sue or with the plaintiff that a lawsuit to evict the defendant. The plaintiff made a contract with the direct measurement is to break the lease, which will only happen in the future.
Supreme Court in 4974/2545.
The defendant is the leases would have a duty to deliver a copy of the license plates, car registration and car hire to the plaintiff. A copy of vehicle registration and vehicle license plate is the essence of the car. Defendant to the plaintiff under the contract to deliver the car by car, no money will be used for the purposes intended by the contract. It is liable to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 and Section 549 the defendant was at fault contract. It is claimed that due to the company from a third party. The defendant did not transfer the car registration. The contract is an agreement of reciprocity. When the defendant is at fault the plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the lease and hire purchase payments under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369.
Supreme Court in 8530/2544.
Despite promises to the defendant in the equipment and the plaintiff states that defendant agreed to transfer the equipment to the plaintiff from the date of the contract. And the plaintiff took delivery of such equipment and accessories. But the fact that in the contract, the defendant does not deliver equipment and supplies to the plaintiff, so that the contract was contrary to Section 523 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which states that To be completed upon delivery of the property. Agreement is not perfect. As with the equipment lease between the defendant and the plaintiff made the same day. When the plaintiff does not deliver the leased property to the defendant to apply. The defendants agreed in the contract will include a statement that the equipment and the equipment installed at the agency of the defendant. Because the lease is not completely contrary to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 546 which stipulates that the lessor must deliver the property and rent it in a good repair. The plaintiff has no right to demand the rent. The defendant shall recover damages and radio equipment.
Supreme Court to 951/2544.
Plaintiff to purchase the property for leasing. The ideal conditions for exploitation. When the dispute has not yet made registration plate and the circle. Plaintiff has the duty to provide to the defendant. Because the document is the essence of the vehicle must be provided to facilitate the registration of a car lease as specified in the contract. The plaintiff delivered the defendant has not disputed is appropriate to use. The supply plate and a circular sign to the defendants. Plaintiff, the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 and Section 549 because the contract is an agreement of reciprocity. When the plaintiff is at fault. The defendant shall have the right not to pay the purchase by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369, the defendant did not pay the lease to the plaintiff and defendant can not be considered in default.
Supreme Court in 7379/2543.
According to Section 572, paragraph one of Section 537 and Section 546 requires that the plaintiff has a duty under the hire purchase contract dispute, the dispute must be delivered to the defendant, a hire car to the defendant, a use. or get in the car for the purposes of contract disputes. When listening to the f. Who purchase and take delivery of cars to the plaintiff and defendant, both parties had a contract dispute and hire purchase contracts are secured to the plaintiff. After the plaintiff filed May. With a hire purchase contract disputes. Together, delivered the car back to dispute the plaintiff. The plaintiff and defendant entered into a lease dispute, the state park a car repair garage without the need to repair and replace the pickup truck at the defendant a new car has not been disputed to the hire-purchase. Case held that the plaintiff could not have delivered the car to the defendant disputes the plaintiff can not claim that a contract between the plaintiff and a defendant's claim to enforce against the two defendants.
Supreme Court to 782/2541.
The plaintiff, who is the owner of the car and the car would have to hire-purchase contracts that must be delivered to the defendant's vehicle leasing and hire purchase to benefit the defendant used or car hire. And the defendant is able to drive a car legally. Which the defendant can take advantage of car hire-purchase for the purposes of the lease. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 572, paragraph one of Article 537 and 546 the plaintiff is responsible for handling registration of change of engine number of cars in their own right. The defendants can hire a car without breaking the law. The defendant informed the plaintiff and the engine number and registration. However, plaintiffs ignore. The defendant did not pay the lease to the plaintiff from the defendant, the plaintiff would not have no right to sue for breach of contract damages.
Supreme Court to 679/2540.
The car dispute was taken to the police office because he has reasonable grounds to suspect that an illegal vehicle identification number with the car which is not the fault of the plaintiff's action is the only hire the plaintiff. is not responsible for the auto dispute was taken to the evidence and the history of the auto dispute was not a vehicle is illegal, it is the duty of the owner of the defendant to 2 to hire the plaintiff, the lease is not the knowledge or possession of evidence. relating to car disputes the plaintiff has substantially complied with the agreement by giving notice to the defendant to 2 to hire out to the car were taken within 7 days of being seized and held that the plaintiff had made the payment in full agreement to the defendant. 2, it is liable to the plaintiff, defendant, the two would argue, provide evidence that the auto dispute, not a car is illegal even if it sounds like it would make the liability of the defendants 2 to the plaintiff to be due to damage of the plaintiff which are not. use of the asset purchase agreement has occurred.
Supreme Court in 3796/2540.
Leasing property to a ten-wheel truck. (Center Rotterdam) for heavy trucks.Tenants have the right to terminate the contract under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 572 and Section 537 and Section 548 on car hire Adam that the defendant is that plaintiff is not listed as prohibited by section 7 of the 2522 Act, which prohibits motor vehicles who are not registered. The defendant claimed. The car was then carried to a police official was arrested.Held that the plaintiff has delivered a car as a condition not suitable to be used for the benefit of the lease. The defendant will lose his contract.
Supreme Court in 3541/2539.
When a contract is a contract stating that occupy the building. The contents of the agreement was expressly stated that the plaintiff must follow to complete the agreement. Defendant to register the rental booking. In addition, the contract had not been delivered to the plaintiff in a building used or to take advantage of the hire property in accordance with Section 537 and Section 546 agreements for space in the building such as a lease. Real estate is a separate type of contract which shall be in accordance with the contract. The agreement does not prohibit the plaintiff's assignment book to others as the plaintiff informed the defendant that the sale of the book, others will assume that the plaintiff did not breach. The defendant did not rely on such termination.
Supreme Court in 5163/2538.
To lease land to dig for the gems of the leased land to dig for gems that have come before, whether it is material on the leased land were digging for gemstones, but before the lease contract. By understanding that the land rent did not have to dig for gems before it is tendered by mistake in the features of the property which is normally regarded as the essence of the land lease is void when the lease was void clear I was told. termination of the lease and to pay the rent check is given back to the lessor of the lease is void from the outset, but the parties must return to the original lessor must return the check to pay rent to a tenant.
Supreme Court in 3705/2528.
The defendant made the plaintiff leased to the charter is a contract it's cast. When the ship sank the boat's trip would not be extinguished. But when the intent And practice, between the plaintiff and defendant that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to take the boat trip it's that it has entered into a lease for a new boat and must comply with the new contract. Hiring a new boat must conform to the charter agreement, it's skill.
Defects of the ship if the tenant must not cause death. Without the use and benefit. The lessor is also solved. If any non-compliant. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 548, but according to Section 551 of the tenants will be given to the landlord to correct the defect before it is evident that prior to the termination had the tenant to notify the plaintiff to. rent and fix the defect before. Termination of the defendant and the like.
After the plaintiff, the defendant terminated the contract to deliver the boat back to the plaintiff by refusing to rent the boat again. The defendant is at fault. And is liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff. However, plaintiff has not filed a claim for damages from the defendants. I can not claim the rent due under the lease with rental boats are in possession of the plaintiff along. Defendant does not use or benefit of such vessels. The defendant, therefore, not be liable for the rent that is due under the lease.
Supreme Court in 4554/2533.
Lease of the plaintiff to the defendant is accused of hiring the employee's residence. The plaintiff is the key to the room of Miss. Employees of the defendant at night, while Ms. York. Sleeping, but the plaintiff is to turn off the water because the water has been left with a female plaintiff. If it's not serious. Against the defendant to raise this as a reason for termination of the lease has not.
Supreme Court in 3483/2529.
The car owner to car passengers or visitors to the different locations as agreed with the travel company or store has the compensation may be due to lease a car. Any contract or other agreement. It depends on the agreement and the fact that the parties treat each other. If the lease is in accordance with the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 537 546 and 552 must be noted that the party is not satisfied as far as not inconsistent with traditional contract. In the short period of time, the party has benefited from the use or possession of property is property that
Plaintiff's car to take passengers or visitors to the different agreed upon by the travel agent or shop fees. However, plaintiff fails to deliver possession of the vehicle shall be used alone. And contractors to get the car to the place of others do not. Plaintiff, the driver drove to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's vehicle too. Party plaintiff has no control over the vehicle. Or may order the driver of the car to the plaintiff under the will of their own. The agreement was to lease it. The plaintiff was a travel agent or shop used to transport the plaintiff. The plaintiff was paid more.
Section 547 tenants have to pay to be necessary and appropriate to maintain the rental property and how much. The lessor must pay to the tenant. Unless the cost of routine maintenance and minor repairs.
Section 548 if the rent for the property which is leased by a state not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Tenants will pay a termination.
Section 549 Delivery of property to rent it. The liability of the lessor in case of defect, and pay the better. The result of the commitment that it will not be liable for these persons to enforce the provisions of this Code dealing with the appropriate provisions.
Article 550 The lessor shall be liable for defects arising during the period of lease. And the landlord must repair everything that they needed. Unless the repair of the laws or customs that the tenant will have to do it.
Section 551 if the defects of the leased property, the tenant must not cause death without the use and benefit. And the lessor to be resolved soon. Notice to the tenant to the landlord to correct defects before. If the lessor and not the reconciled within a reasonable time, the tenant may terminate the contract time. If that defect is fatal to the right to do so.
Supreme Court in 6036/2551.
Road building on disputed land by the defendant against the plaintiff before the land from the plaintiff. The defendant's actions did not violate the plaintiff. But the front right of the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff's lease. The plaintiff is not entitled to sue for infringement of legal action against the defendant.
Supreme Court in 5379/2549.
Captive leasing new vehicles are not registered. Act of plaintiff's vehicle. The defendant had registered the car lease payments to the plaintiff for the plaintiff to proceed to registration. Held that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed that the plaintiff has a registered car hire. After 9 months, the plaintiff has not contracted to perform the registration. The plaintiff is at fault. Deliveries by truck are not suitable to be utilized. The defendant shall have the right to terminate the contract.
Supreme Court in 1471/2548.
Article 4 states that the lease the lessee must maintain the leased property, all of which are in good condition and complete. To repair the wear and tear of normal use it. The agreement gives the tenant is required to reserve a rental property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. Requires little maintenance, and repair provided by Section 553 only. I mean that the lessee will be liable to repair the leased property in every case.
Repair, which is necessary and appropriate to maintain the leased property is in use. It is the duty of the defendant, the lessor under section 547 for use as a routine maintenance and repair, little will fall into the liability of the plaintiff, a tenant, not the defendant, the lessor is the party liable for such repairs. Section 550.
Supreme Court to 312/2541.
The defendant rented a pontoon of steel with the equipment and the Shade of an aircraft in the rental rate per 177,000 and for winch and engine number of a set rate per 7,500 total rent per month and 184,500 baht for rental. Previous use of the leased property with conventional care. And has always been to preserve the leased property that Reply Post Reply preserve their assets. The plaintiff lessor has leased the property back. The leased property has been damaged and worn out. Plaintiff's barge and winch repair the damage. The plaintiff does not attest to the damage caused by the fault of the defendant tenant. We are hearing that the defect is caused by the defendant's use of the leased property by the tenant. Plaintiff, the lessor shall be liable for defects arising during the period of lease. The plaintiff must address all of the repairs required by Section 550, the plaintiff is unable to repair the barge and winch from the defendant.
Supreme Court in 3345/2548.
Contract hire property of either party shall have the right to terminate the agreement in two cases of the contract by one. With the provisions of the law, another under Section 386 is not that when the lease is no requirement that the defendant has the right to terminate the lease. The defendant is not entitled to terminate the contract if they could.
Section 548 defines the duties and responsibilities of the landlord said. If the rent for the property which is leased by a state not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Lessee will pay to terminate the contract or if the fact that the provisions of that law. The defendant shall have the right to terminate the lease to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 409/2548.
When a lease dispute between the plaintiff and defendant to be void. The defendant remains in the dispute further. It is by no right. Despite the violation of the plaintiff's lessor. Any violation of the plaintiff, who leased land, including the disputed matter. But when the plaintiff did not sue the defendant drove out of the dispute would cause the plaintiff has been damaged due to defendant's front right of the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant drove out of the dispute. And damages to the plaintiff's court by asking the landlord to the plaintiff with the plaintiff under Section 477 and Section 549 of the diagnosis. The plaintiff has the power to sue or not to consider the plaintiff's right to exist while the indictment is important.
Supreme Court in 8705/2547.
Although there is no legal relationship between plaintiff and defendant. However, the plaintiff, a tenant disputes the plaintiff's possession of the benefit in dispute was not. The defendant is a tenant of the plaintiff's case and the contract had ended earlier, not out of the dispute shall be entitled to pay the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to the defendant by filing a complaint with the court, the plaintiff was the lessor of the plaintiff to join the Section 477 and 549, the plaintiff has substantially complied with the provisions of such laws. The plaintiff's case was not inserted into the plaintiff's Civil Code Procedure Section 57 (2) When the plaintiff is the plaintiff's consent to a request by the plaintiff. Would have resulted in the plaintiff and the plaintiff sued the defendant.
Supreme Court in 2077/2545.
Measuring the lessor is the owner of commercial building disputes. But the case also in possession of the plaintiff, the second commercial building as a tenant. When the plaintiff, the two had transferred the lease to the plaintiff as a defendant in two, as the transfer of responsibility under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 546 must deliver the property is leased to the plaintiff No. 1 and the contract between the plaintiff and two with The measure remains in force. When the defendants reside in the Town Court by virtue of rights under the sublease agreement made with the plaintiff that two of the plaintiff No. 2 has terminated the sublease agreement and the defendant to the defendant refused the plaintiff No. 2 shall have the power to sue or with the plaintiff that a lawsuit to evict the defendant. The plaintiff made a contract with the direct measurement is to break the lease, which will only happen in the future.
Supreme Court in 4974/2545.
The defendant is the leases would have a duty to deliver a copy of the license plates, car registration and car hire to the plaintiff. A copy of vehicle registration and vehicle license plate is the essence of the car. Defendant to the plaintiff under the contract to deliver the car by car, no money will be used for the purposes intended by the contract. It is liable to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 and Section 549 the defendant was at fault contract. It is claimed that due to the company from a third party. The defendant did not transfer the car registration. The contract is an agreement of reciprocity. When the defendant is at fault the plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the lease and hire purchase payments under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369.
Supreme Court in 8530/2544.
Despite promises to the defendant in the equipment and the plaintiff states that defendant agreed to transfer the equipment to the plaintiff from the date of the contract. And the plaintiff took delivery of such equipment and accessories. But the fact that in the contract, the defendant does not deliver equipment and supplies to the plaintiff, so that the contract was contrary to Section 523 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which states that To be completed upon delivery of the property. Agreement is not perfect. As with the equipment lease between the defendant and the plaintiff made the same day. When the plaintiff does not deliver the leased property to the defendant to apply. The defendants agreed in the contract will include a statement that the equipment and the equipment installed at the agency of the defendant. Because the lease is not completely contrary to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 546 which stipulates that the lessor must deliver the property and rent it in a good repair. The plaintiff has no right to demand the rent. The defendant shall recover damages and radio equipment.
Supreme Court to 951/2544.
Plaintiff to purchase the property for leasing. The ideal conditions for exploitation. When the dispute has not yet made registration plate and the circle. Plaintiff has the duty to provide to the defendant. Because the document is the essence of the vehicle must be provided to facilitate the registration of a car lease as specified in the contract. The plaintiff delivered the defendant has not disputed is appropriate to use. The supply plate and a circular sign to the defendants. Plaintiff, the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 and Section 549 because the contract is an agreement of reciprocity. When the plaintiff is at fault. The defendant shall have the right not to pay the purchase by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369, the defendant did not pay the lease to the plaintiff and defendant can not be considered in default.
Supreme Court in 7379/2543.
According to Section 572, paragraph one of Section 537 and Section 546 requires that the plaintiff has a duty under the hire purchase contract dispute, the dispute must be delivered to the defendant, a hire car to the defendant, a use. or get in the car for the purposes of contract disputes. When listening to the f. Who purchase and take delivery of cars to the plaintiff and defendant, both parties had a contract dispute and hire purchase contracts are secured to the plaintiff. After the plaintiff filed May. With a hire purchase contract disputes. Together, delivered the car back to dispute the plaintiff. The plaintiff and defendant entered into a lease dispute, the state park a car repair garage without the need to repair and replace the pickup truck at the defendant a new car has not been disputed to the hire-purchase. Case held that the plaintiff could not have delivered the car to the defendant disputes the plaintiff can not claim that a contract between the plaintiff and a defendant's claim to enforce against the two defendants.
Supreme Court to 782/2541.
The plaintiff, who is the owner of the car and the car would have to hire-purchase contracts that must be delivered to the defendant's vehicle leasing and hire purchase to benefit the defendant used or car hire. And the defendant is able to drive a car legally. Which the defendant can take advantage of car hire-purchase for the purposes of the lease. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 572, paragraph one of Article 537 and 546 the plaintiff is responsible for handling registration of change of engine number of cars in their own right. The defendants can hire a car without breaking the law. The defendant informed the plaintiff and the engine number and registration. However, plaintiffs ignore. The defendant did not pay the lease to the plaintiff from the defendant, the plaintiff would not have no right to sue for breach of contract damages.
Supreme Court to 679/2540.
The car dispute was taken to the police office because he has reasonable grounds to suspect that an illegal vehicle identification number with the car which is not the fault of the plaintiff's action is the only hire the plaintiff. is not responsible for the auto dispute was taken to the evidence and the history of the auto dispute was not a vehicle is illegal, it is the duty of the owner of the defendant to 2 to hire the plaintiff, the lease is not the knowledge or possession of evidence. relating to car disputes the plaintiff has substantially complied with the agreement by giving notice to the defendant to 2 to hire out to the car were taken within 7 days of being seized and held that the plaintiff had made the payment in full agreement to the defendant. 2, it is liable to the plaintiff, defendant, the two would argue, provide evidence that the auto dispute, not a car is illegal even if it sounds like it would make the liability of the defendants 2 to the plaintiff to be due to damage of the plaintiff which are not. use of the asset purchase agreement has occurred.
Supreme Court in 3796/2540.
Leasing property to a ten-wheel truck. (Center Rotterdam) for heavy trucks.Tenants have the right to terminate the contract under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 572 and Section 537 and Section 548 on car hire Adam that the defendant is that plaintiff is not listed as prohibited by section 7 of the 2522 Act, which prohibits motor vehicles who are not registered. The defendant claimed. The car was then carried to a police official was arrested.Held that the plaintiff has delivered a car as a condition not suitable to be used for the benefit of the lease. The defendant will lose his contract.
Supreme Court in 3541/2539.
When a contract is a contract stating that occupy the building. The contents of the agreement was expressly stated that the plaintiff must follow to complete the agreement. Defendant to register the rental booking. In addition, the contract had not been delivered to the plaintiff in a building used or to take advantage of the hire property in accordance with Section 537 and Section 546 agreements for space in the building such as a lease. Real estate is a separate type of contract which shall be in accordance with the contract. The agreement does not prohibit the plaintiff's assignment book to others as the plaintiff informed the defendant that the sale of the book, others will assume that the plaintiff did not breach. The defendant did not rely on such termination.
Supreme Court in 5163/2538.
To lease land to dig for the gems of the leased land to dig for gems that have come before, whether it is material on the leased land were digging for gemstones, but before the lease contract. By understanding that the land rent did not have to dig for gems before it is tendered by mistake in the features of the property which is normally regarded as the essence of the land lease is void when the lease was void clear I was told. termination of the lease and to pay the rent check is given back to the lessor of the lease is void from the outset, but the parties must return to the original lessor must return the check to pay rent to a tenant.
Supreme Court in 3705/2528.
The defendant made the plaintiff leased to the charter is a contract it's cast. When the ship sank the boat's trip would not be extinguished. But when the intent And practice, between the plaintiff and defendant that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to take the boat trip it's that it has entered into a lease for a new boat and must comply with the new contract. Hiring a new boat must conform to the charter agreement, it's skill.
Defects of the ship if the tenant must not cause death. Without the use and benefit. The lessor is also solved. If any non-compliant. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 548, but according to Section 551 of the tenants will be given to the landlord to correct the defect before it is evident that prior to the termination had the tenant to notify the plaintiff to. rent and fix the defect before. Termination of the defendant and the like.
After the plaintiff, the defendant terminated the contract to deliver the boat back to the plaintiff by refusing to rent the boat again. The defendant is at fault. And is liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff. However, plaintiff has not filed a claim for damages from the defendants. I can not claim the rent due under the lease with rental boats are in possession of the plaintiff along. Defendant does not use or benefit of such vessels. The defendant, therefore, not be liable for the rent that is due under the lease.
Supreme Court in 4554/2533.
Lease of the plaintiff to the defendant is accused of hiring the employee's residence. The plaintiff is the key to the room of Miss. Employees of the defendant at night, while Ms. York. Sleeping, but the plaintiff is to turn off the water because the water has been left with a female plaintiff. If it's not serious. Against the defendant to raise this as a reason for termination of the lease has not.
Supreme Court in 3483/2529.
The car owner to car passengers or visitors to the different locations as agreed with the travel company or store has the compensation may be due to lease a car. Any contract or other agreement. It depends on the agreement and the fact that the parties treat each other. If the lease is in accordance with the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 537 546 and 552 must be noted that the party is not satisfied as far as not inconsistent with traditional contract. In the short period of time, the party has benefited from the use or possession of property is property that
Plaintiff's car to take passengers or visitors to the different agreed upon by the travel agent or shop fees. However, plaintiff fails to deliver possession of the vehicle shall be used alone. And contractors to get the car to the place of others do not. Plaintiff, the driver drove to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's vehicle too. Party plaintiff has no control over the vehicle. Or may order the driver of the car to the plaintiff under the will of their own. The agreement was to lease it. The plaintiff was a travel agent or shop used to transport the plaintiff. The plaintiff was paid more.
