Section 537 rental properties. The contract, which is called a lease agreement to another person, called the lessee to use or benefit of property, one of a limited period of time. The tenant agrees to rent to them.
Section 538 of the rental property. If there is no evidence either in writing signed by the parties liable as a priority. He claims that the court can not If the rent is more than three years. Or the life of the lessee or lessor gem. Unless made in writing and registered with the competent authority. He said the lease will be prosecuted to the court, but only three years.
Section 539 court fees to lease. The parties shall be released to both parties.
Section 540 property. You may not rent, is scheduled for more than thirty years. If the contract is for a period longer than that, he was reduced to thirty years.
The schedule for the platform. At the end, then it's time to renew. But not to exceed thirty years from the date of the contract.
Section 541 rental agreement is made as to whether the life of the lessor or the lessee is to be done.
Section 542 of the movable property of individuals who call for the value of the lease. If you fall into the possession of the property to the tenant before a contract hire property that They have more than others.
Section 543 which many people claim the same property. The value of the lease. You shall be determined as follows.
(1) If the rent was the type who does not mandated by law to be registered will be considered an asset to the lessee before the lease is in possession of their rights than others.
(2) If a lease of any kind which are required by law shall be deemed to be registered for the registration of their lease before it is entitled to more than others.
(3) If the lease contains both of which must be registered and which does not require registration under the law, they are idols. He said tenants who have registered their rent is more than right. Unless another tenant is in possession of such property to rent with his registration date before then.
Section 544 property lease. Tenant to sublease or transfer any of their rights in such property, whether in whole or in part, to an outsider. You probably do not know what. Unless agreed otherwise in the contract.
If the tenant violates any provision of this act. The lessor may terminate the contract time.
Section 545 if the tenants renting the property which he sublet it to others like you fried a sublease that would be liable to the lessor directly. In this case, if the lease is a lease to rent first. You may find that the lease may be raised as a defense to the landlord can not.
However, this provision does not prohibit the lessor to enforce their rights against the tenant.
Supreme Court in 6275/2551.
The land lease is a lease dispute, one must fall. Subject to the provisions of Section 538 which requires a written document signed by the parties liable as a priority. When a defendant disputes the claim that the land lease from the plaintiff. Sublease contract with the plaintiff but did not do it. And appeared to have the lease in writing of any signature. The defendant's tenant. I can not sublease the defendant lean to the plaintiff. The defendants are accused in a land dispute must be based on the rights of the plaintiff. The defendant claimed that the State Railway of Thailand to terminate the lease of land to the plaintiff. That the plaintiff has no power to fight against the defendant has not expelled. When the plaintiff did not consent to the defendant in a land dispute anymore and has told them. Defendant from the land dispute. The defendant ignored the dispute was still in the land would be in violation. The plaintiff sued the defendant drove out of the land dispute and the defendant compensate the lost.
Supreme Court in 6962/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendants in the plaintiff's property after the lease expired. The plaintiff does not wish to give notice to the defendant and the defendant for the transfer of assets out. From the land of the plaintiff. But the defendant ignored. The move forced the defendant and the attendant removal of property from the estate of the plaintiff. The defendant to pay compensation of 1,000 baht from the date of filing until the defendant and the family will move into the property. It sued to force the defendant in the infringement. Shall not be sued under the contract rent property The plaintiff as the owner has the right to sue without a fighter. The land lease contract as evidence in court. Although the contract did not stamp duty is to listen to evidence.
Supreme Court in 6239/2551.
Defendant on the ground floor of a building lease from the plaintiff for a period of three years of the lease are not labeled. Defendant to the plaintiff the right to terminate the contract at any time. The defendant to terminate the contract before the expiry of the lease term must be imposed by Section 387 to 389.
Depriving the defendant fails to pay rent to the plaintiff within the time specified in the contract. The defendant then went to check late without warning, according to Section 204 paragraph two, the plaintiff shall have the authority to sue to force the defendant to pay the rent under the lease to the plaintiff under section 213 paragraph one, without the right to terminate the contract.
Supreme Court in 4899/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant drove the narrative action that Defendants dispute that the lease rent from the plaintiff and the period of lease to the plaintiff and the defendant does not want to live anymore. The defendants filed for eviction. The defendant paid the rent arrears and damages. The defendant testified that. Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant has agreed to lease it for 20 years, the defendant did not owe rent. Lease has not expired. The first is that the dispute. While both the plaintiff filed this lawsuit is. Leases of property dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant's due date of hire or not to appeal the decision by the reasoning in defense of the defendant in that manner. To listen to the defense of the accused have the right to lease rights of the plaintiff were both 20 years from the date of the contract, while the Court of Appeal considered the duration of the lease is expired when the plaintiffs either do not wish to be accused of renting. anymore. Dispute that the defendant had to leave the building. It is diagnosed by the time the claims of both plaintiffs. And against the defendant does not meet the case. But to make the case to be delayed unreasonably. The facts of the case was diagnosed. The decision of the Supreme Court agreed that such disputes without the need to go. To appeal the decision.
Agreement to allow the plaintiff and the amount of rent to be lower than reality. To avoid the tax, which is a function of Thai citizens under the law shall be contrary to the peace agreement and the morality of the people. The defendant can not raise a claim to such agreement as a defense against it. The plaintiff testified that the two will not refute the defendant's defense of such matter. The defendant and her husband rented the building to make room disputes and snooker room. Despite an investment of U.S. $ 7 million renovation to the building but it is an investment for the benefit of the defendant and her husband own the business. It may not be considered as a reciprocal agreement in more than a simple lease.
When the lease period, and the plaintiff sued the defendant did not intend to. Lease it. The case against the defendant in the building is in violation of the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal sentenced the defendant to pay the rent arrears and damages from the date wrong. Contract to sue and sue until after the defendant and family disputes out of the building. At the request of both plaintiff and the like.
Supreme Court in 3005/2551.
Defendant, plaintiff, a 10-year lease of the defendant, the nature of the building from a shop, restaurant, bar, beer is kind of done for the convenience of living in the leased property from the plaintiff only There is a reciprocal agreement in the lease than it is to make the defendant has the right to lease more than normal.
Supreme Court to 451/2551.
Defendant's land rights of the plaintiff area of 7 acres 2 to the park rental fee of 7,500 baht a lease once a year by the plaintiff to the defendant for over a period of about 15 years ago, but the defendant is liable. Land disputes, as agreed. Which adds more burden to the defendant of the contract normally. If the rental period is normally one year, shall give the defendant the benefit of the defendant was not worth the investment in land development and lemon plantations. At the end of the period of lease. The defendant agrees to the gardens and buildings that had grown up in a land dispute is the plaintiff. Benefit to the plaintiff by Plaintiff's own intent by the defendant's explicit consent to the disputed land for a period of 30 years in return. The lease is a lease agreement, reciprocal worse than normal.
Supreme Court to 10264/2550.
Permitting transfer of leasehold rights has clearly stated that I transferred the lease within three months, when the agreement made on August 31, 2534 The assignment of the lease, which must be made within 3 months, it will be due on or before November 30, 2534, the parties scheduled payment. debt is of course the day of this calendar. Held that the plaintiff's claim for a repayment period of the course. When it is known that all three defendants are not entitled to transfer the land to the plaintiff's case. If no payment is made within the given time period. It can force the plaintiff claims the plaintiff has since expired. As already mentioned, the period from December 1, 2534 as the default for all three defendants and the plaintiff may enforce claims under Section 193/12.
The transfer of leasehold rights in this case will have to battle the consent of the lessor before it, but the timing of the payment by the transfer of the leasehold agreement. Between the two parties was transferred to a transferee who is a party only. The Crown Property Bureau, which is transferred to the third party. Rent are not involved in the timing of any payment, but the agreement between the parties by letter of transfer of leasehold rights that To transfer the lease within 3 months to be effective.
Supreme Court in 7722/2550.
The plaintiff and defendant were both allowed to use or benefit in the area. The side and front of the building of the first plaintiff to the defendant's product label to a period of one year is limited. And the defendant agreed to pay compensation to the plaintiff and a defendant is 80,000 baht per year and will rent to them. Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant both as a rental property such as Section 537.
When the plaintiff is a commercial property that is permanently affixed to the land of the estate under Section 139 and the leased property is an area beside and in front of the building. Building walls with permanent fixtures in the commercial real estate property can be rented in accordance with the provisions of Section 538 to require proof of a written one. Signed by the parties liable as a priority. Otherwise, legal action has not
When the rental agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant both as evidence. Writing and signed by both defendants. Both the plaintiff can not sue to force the defendant to pay the rent by. Term of lease.
Supreme Court in 4260/2550.
Land formerly owned by the trustee of T. T. The Bank has entered into a lease for a period of 20 years at Bank of tenement buildings on the land. It is combined with the land under Section 146 the plaintiff bought the land from the trustee of T. During the term of the lease. The plaintiff is the owner of commercial building But at the end of the lease the land bank would be entitled to the land required to demolish the commercial building commercial building unless the Bank agrees to become the plaintiff. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff when the defendant has authorized the Town. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff, but the bank that owns the tenement house law has no power to limit the duration of the lease. When the lease expired. The duration of the dispute over the rent that would not fall to the plaintiff under section 569 on the plaintiff does not dispute that the defendant is in the room anymore. But she did not go out. The action against the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 7426/2550.
Mon 4 document is labeled "I, Mrs. B. (defendant) for a fee to sell your debt, A. (Plaintiff), according to the notice of the public reported it, but Mrs. B. (defendant. ) would reduce the debt to be paid only 70,000 baht is still not agreed. District attorneys must ask you (the plaintiff) will be payable before any comments. Therefore, the presence of the witnesses signed the same "as the defendant admitted that plaintiff's lease and rent arrears exist. The defendant signed a memorandum of lease shall be considered as evidence which would bring. Prosecution asks court by Section 538.
Supreme Court in 8196 - 8199/2549.
Clergy Act 2505 and section 31 paragraph three states that represent the abbot of the temple in the business generally. The act mandated that the measure will be measured by a seal. Both instruments appeared to establish a limited authority to require the seal of the plaintiff's attorney, even one that I have the power to appoint an MP and legal prosecution of the plaintiff that a sign would appear that Sun just does not. The first seal of the plaintiff by the defendant, it is perfectly legal to 2, which is why I have power of attorney during the prosecution of the plaintiff.
No. 2 (BE 2511) issued under the. Sangha Act of 2505.
Supreme Court to 368/2549.
Defendant to lease land for the corridor and the location of the market and lease the building or buildings on the plaintiff. The agreement to pay rent, taxes, fees or any other money the tenant must pay the overdue rent. Tenants must pay the extra money as a penalty rate of 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid amount. Leases Leases of property, such as the Section 537 agreement, the penalty is a property lease agreement. The penalty must be filed within 6 months from the filing of the defendant to return property to rent.
Supreme Court in 6472/2548.
Lease agreement between the defendant and the defendant Sat tenant rental rates charged 1235 baht per month on concern that the tenants in the mall as long as 20 years, the rental rate is a very small amount and it does not. The rent is usually normal. The total lease payment is U.S. $ 2,790,550 as part of the rent that the defendant in advance of the Sun because the lease agreements, the tenant has no right to receive royalty for all other cases. The lease can be terminated by reason of the death of the tenant in any way. When the lease is terminated by reason of the death of the tenant Sat defendant must reimburse the landlord for lease part of the rent paid in advance by the non-use of the plaintiff, an heir.
Supreme Court in 4809/2548.
Contract hire property is a reciprocal agreement with the plaintiff, a defendant voluntarily agreed to the terms of the contract, some differ from the provisions of the law. Which preserve the rights and benefits of their favorite business. It may have some advantages or disadvantages, and different from the provisions of the law. It is not a law relating to public order or good morals of the people. The contract is in force. Shall be bound by the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant in all three contracts is not regarded as an exercise in bad faith.
Supreme Court in 3345/2548.
Contract hire property of either party shall have the right to terminate the agreement in two cases of the contract by one. With the provisions of the law, another under Section 386 is not that when the lease is no requirement that the defendant has the right to terminate the lease. The defendant is not entitled to terminate the contract if they could.
Section 548 defines the duties and responsibilities of the landlord said. If the rent for the property which is leased by a state not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Lessee will pay to terminate the contract or if the fact that the provisions of that law. The defendant shall have the right to terminate the lease to the plaintiff.
Defendants to lease the car from the plaintiff to the defendant's customers. Lease requires that the plaintiff, the lessor is a parking pass for the defendant to 100 cards to the customer. If no parking tickets to cars parked at the defendant's customers will be charged the normal parking. Parking pass, it is important and it is the duty of the plaintiff to make parking tickets given to the defendant. The parking card is lost, and the plaintiff has made 83 new parking ticket to the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that the new parking card. The defendant shall be issued free of charge and the defendant to pay a parking pass to the plaintiff to be correct, it is another matter. The defendant has no right to terminate the contract because of it. When the defendant has no right to terminate the contract, the plaintiff and the defendant did not terminate the lease to the defendant. Lease remains in effect. The defendants are accused of not paying the rent becomes the default. The defendant did not provide the customers of the defendant's car parked in the building of the plaintiff. Not cause the defendant to pay the rent. Must be bound to pay the rent until the lease term.
Supreme Court in 1602/2548.
Subject matter of the plaintiff is the owner by inheritance of grade I entered a commercial building leased to the defendant disputes.It is a commitment that will allow tenants to renew for next time. It does not cause the contract. But this promise is not binding because it's not that I had to meet before I died when she learned that I proposed to death on July 5, 2537 before the expiry of the lease. Date December 31, 2538 case must be governed by Section 360, which stipulates that prohibits the provisions of Section 169 shall not apply to such a commitment I will not become effective and not as a legacy. The plaintiff, an heir is bound to comply with the provisions of Section 1599 and Section 1600 of the defendant's request for renewal has no effect. And does not cause a new lease. The plaintiff sued to terminate the lease and evict the defendant and family disputes out of the building.
When the defendant has no right in the tenement and family disputes after the contract ends. The defendant and the family remained in Town Court. It is like to live without rights possible. Violation of the plaintiff. Defendant is liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff's lack of a commercial building disputes.
Supreme Court in 1469/2548.
Subject matter has since been restored. The plaintiff entered into an agreement to rent a tenement district, District Court of the land and construction costs, the plaintiff does not help, as even I have to pay Sun, who sells commercial building disputes and the right to lease land to the District or b. the amount of 1.4 million baht from the contractor billed costs and the cost of construction Fri and Sat from construction to pay for it, it holds that B is paid for. Subject to the transfer of leasehold rights of individuals with their priority is from the Sun to Fri or Sat only B is used for the construction. The lease between the plaintiff and the district, such as a more conventional contract hire property in any way.
Supreme Court to 735/2548.
The text and details on the leased property. The duration of the lease, the lessee agrees to pay the rent on a monthly basis. Obligations of the lessee. Loss and damage of the leased property and contract rights to terminate the lease. The nature of the Civil and Commercial Code hire property without any showing that the parties have agreed to a purchase or lease the leased property. And does not appear that the rent is paid as part of the leased property. Although under Article 6, the lessee has the right to purchase the leased property. It is just a commitment to sell the leased property to the tenant wishes to buy in the future. The parties did not intend to transfer a property to rent, since the beginning of the lease. The agreement is the contract rent property
Termination hire property need not be in writing, the power to terminate the contract attorneys will not be made in writing. When the plaintiff a letter terminating the contract with the postal receipt showing that the plaintiff has terminated the contract lawfully.
Supreme Court in 8367/2547.
The defendant terminated the lease because the lease with the building and leased it to the building. The sub-contract the performance of others. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract immediately, under contract to the defendant. When the plaintiff to the defendant to terminate the lease and the lease agreement shall be binding. Defendant's property and the family must move from building to building, leasing and delivery. The night before the plaintiff in the plaintiff within the time prescribed. Although the plaintiff has notice to the defendant. Payment of rent arrears and after the plaintiff has terminated the lease to the defendant. And the defendant has acted in accordance with the payment of rent. Backlog within the stipulated time. The end result is a binding contract to back up non-binding.
Supreme Court in 4392/2547.
A. The defendant in a land dispute for a period of 30 years and will give the defendant a lease for another 30 years after the lease ends if the defendant is a defendant in a permit required by the S borrowing to 300,000 baht. land disputes.The defendant can not claim an interest, such as acquisition of land rights of the defendant that a contract is enforced by the state in the contract. Both types of contracts, even though the benefits are tied to each other. But as a result of the contract. Each party has the right to protect the future interests of the contract if the terms of the increased burden on the defendant as a tenant, the tenant shall be the duty of more than usual. A. Land lease dispute between the defendant to a reciprocal agreement that is worse than an ordinary lease.
Under the land lease agreement in the dispute is only whether the defendant committed the T. parties to a lease of land only. It does not cause the contract. Even if the lease is in writing and registered with the competent. But this promise was not binding because it s not that a defendant has been before the death of T.. When a defendant who has already know that s death before the 30-year leases are due to be mandated by Section 360, which stipulates that the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code Section 169 paragraph two shall have no binding commitment Rd.
Supreme Court in 3916/2547.
Land and land rent was about 1 meter deep in the abdomen had leased land for the construction of the defendant. The defendant and the reclamation of zinc, wooden picket around the leased land by the lease. The purpose of the defendant tenant. The lease agreement requires that Lessor agrees to lease the building to house the workers and the establishment of the rentable area. The regulations do not allow tenants to be done. It gives tenants the right to build it. The contract specifies that At the end of the lease, then what is done, it becomes property of the lessor, unless the two-story steel frame it. When the reclamation and building a fence to make up for the benefit of the tenants themselves. The worker had housing tenants were created by the defendant is entitled to temporary buildings on the land lease price is not high and the area of 1 rai 2 ngan 45 square wah penetration in sub-district of Sukhumvit Bangkok You can rent at least 20,000 baht per month to lease the rent is $ 5,000 per month to meet with the defendant to comply with licensing agreements and leases. The lease agreement is not reciprocal worse than an ordinary lease.
Supreme Court in 1035/2547.
Rental property in accordance with Section 537 does not apply if the lessor must own the property for rent. But the landlord have to rent a book, you can claim in court, so that the plaintiff sued to enforce the lease, the plaintiff made against each defendant. The leased property is not the plaintiff. But when she accepted a contract with the plaintiff. The defendant shall be bound by the agreement. When the defendant's breach of contract. The plaintiff sued the defendant.
The 3-year lease agreement will terminate at the end of the period. Without prior notice. To combat that, due to the defendant rented. The defendant remains in the land lease and pay rent to the plaintiff. I accept the plaintiff without objection. The plaintiff, the defendant has entered a new period without it. This means that the agreement on the term are not effective in the next section. The other terms as the original agreement, including the rent. If the lease is true that the defendant had no reason to pay higher rental rates as specified in the lease contract. And serve as proof of the defendant to pay the rent, there is no weight to the hearing and the evidence does not refute the plaintiff. So I do not think the plaintiff had a new lease. The defendant must be immediately removed from the leased land at the end of the period. The plaintiff need not have terminated the contract with the defendant before the Court.
Supreme Court in 1015/2547.
The dispute became public. For people who do not possess any rights to the disputed state. But the people together, they raised up against the other to take possession.
The plaintiff owns the interests in a public dispute. The defendant in that case I use to house the defendant would pay the rent or compensation to the plaintiff. The defendant admitted that the plaintiff has the right than the defendant. That the defendant possessed the right of the plaintiff's case, it is the possession of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to dispute over the defendant. When the plaintiff to the defendant does not wish to continue. The defendant must be removed from the land dispute.
The second paragraph of the decision by the general meeting of the Supreme Court (No. 1 / 2547).
Supreme Court in 2744/2546.
Defendant's house on land leased from the plaintiff's case. The land dispute under the defendant's house was built as a result of water erosion to the river bank erosion. Land dispute turned into a bank where the defendant continues to lease the land dispute with the plaintiff and the defendant still retains the right of land ownership disputes and reap the benefits of a rent dispute. Does not allow it to be a bank, the public will come to a mutual benefit to the land dispute is not that a bank which is public under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1304 (2) When the land lease dispute ended, and the lapse of time. granted the plaintiff to the defendant in a land dispute. The defendant has no right to dispute the plaintiff in the land anymore. The plaintiff has the right to sue to evict the defendant.
Supreme Court to 244/2546.
The Telephone Organization of the plaintiff is ordered to notify the tenant owed rent from the 30-day money back within 15 days if not paid by the letter of notification to the manager for not providing it. However, such rules and regulations for employees of the plaintiff in the action. That the defendant may not raise claims to have refused to pay rent arrears in any way. And that the defendant pay the plaintiff would pay the overdue rent a phone. Caused the plaintiff did not notice or suspend the service. In addition, the contract says. If the rental amount that the service is invalid. Tenants have the right to request validation required. The tenant must pay for the service.
Supreme Court in 2196/2545.
Leases of land disputes is scheduled for 6 years but have not registered with the competent authority. It claims the court was only 3 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 538, but after three years, she continued to land disputes with the plaintiff without further objection. Must be considered for the next with no time limit under Section 570, the plaintiff, the defendant can not terminate the lease at any time. But notice the first method as defined in Section 566 on the defendant received a letter terminating the contract, which is the date on which the plaintiff brought a lawsuit was filed a full 2 months is not required under Section 566 of the termination of Plaintiffs did not like. But in addition to a plaintiff alleging that the condition of the lease term. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendants are in arrears with the rent. The defendants do not have to fight in this case. The court heard that the defendant owed the plaintiff a notice to the defendant to pay the rent and the rent is due. To sue after a period of not less than 15 days in accordance with Article 560, paragraph two, the plaintiff has the right to sue to evict the defendant from the land lease and demanded the defendant to pay the rent arrears.
Supreme Court in 4486/2545.
Plaintiff to lease the commercial premises to the defendant. The agreement that the plaintiff will have to decorate the place according to the defendant. The plaintiff fails to install electrical systems. Approved by the defendant. The defendant's breach of contract. The contract stipulated that if plaintiff's breach of contract. Defendants have the right to shut shop. Water and electricity cut off in the mornings. Not infringe the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 7334/2540.
Leasehold property and the identity of the defendant, but when a. the lessor consents to the assignment of the lease by allowing the opposition to seize the official and auction like this. The opposition has the power to seize and auction the right to dispute the defendant's lease. According to the Bankruptcy Act 2483 Section 22.
Supreme Court to 383/2540.
Rental property is usually the lessor would mark the features of the tenants that would deserve the trust in the use of the leased property and to maintain the leased property or if the rights of tenants to have an exclusive on. tenant dies the lease shall be canceled to devolve to the heirs of the lease clause 4 states that the lease has not expired contracts who have the right to transfer the rental to others, but must pay compensation.the defendant did not entail any way.
Supreme Court in 2037/2539.
The building sub-contract dispute between the plaintiff by the liquidation of a sublease with Off. The lease is an agreement that Off. To make money from the compensation to the plaintiff. The term of the sublease agreement for the remainder of the lease contract of the plaintiff, the better. Or the rights and duties which the plaintiff has under the existing contract, which went off. They are all the terms of the sublease agreement between the plaintiff's side. The parties have entered into an agreement to be bound together. The intent of the parties shall be bound to the lease would need to meet the intent of the parties. The cause of the change to the sale or transfer of a leasehold. Especially considering the plaintiff's contract with the Village and District No. 6 and 7 it is seen that in seven cases, the landlord agreed to allow a tenant to lease all or part of the building to someone else. But in sub-clause 6 as if the tenant is transferred to another person.However, the plaintiff obtained the contract. Off. To bind a party to the landlord directly. Contract between the plaintiff with Off. It is not a transfer of leasehold rights. Plaintiffs are also entitled to a contract with the University and I was indeed referring to the lease originally made it.
Supreme Court in 1050/2539.
If the tenant leases misconduct by the leased property sublet to others. No agreement shall be made in the lease. The lessor to terminate the lease would love to be in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 544, paragraph two of which provided by it. Does not fall within the provisions of section 387, which is a general rule that the contract is terminated before the lease and before the lawsuit. Notice to the defendant that the plaintiff does not need to be a lease within a reasonable period of time as the first plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 6444/2537.
Sales contracts, lease contracts, which give rise to reciprocal debts between the plaintiff and defendant by defendant as a creditor in order to claim the cost of transfer of leasehold rights to the plaintiff. At the same time it is due to be tendered to the lessor the right to transfer the lease to the plaintiff, the plaintiff is a creditor of the defendant, the defendant claims that the assignment of the lease to the plaintiff. The debtor must pay the cost of transfer of leasehold rights of the defendant.The assignment of the lease dispute will affect on the rental agreement before you transfer it. The Court held that the lessor would not dispute the plaintiff's house. The defendant must be sentenced to the lessor of his intention to transfer the lease to the plaintiff.
Section 538 of the rental property. If there is no evidence either in writing signed by the parties liable as a priority. He claims that the court can not If the rent is more than three years. Or the life of the lessee or lessor gem. Unless made in writing and registered with the competent authority. He said the lease will be prosecuted to the court, but only three years.
Section 539 court fees to lease. The parties shall be released to both parties.
Section 540 property. You may not rent, is scheduled for more than thirty years. If the contract is for a period longer than that, he was reduced to thirty years.
The schedule for the platform. At the end, then it's time to renew. But not to exceed thirty years from the date of the contract.
Section 541 rental agreement is made as to whether the life of the lessor or the lessee is to be done.
Section 542 of the movable property of individuals who call for the value of the lease. If you fall into the possession of the property to the tenant before a contract hire property that They have more than others.
Section 543 which many people claim the same property. The value of the lease. You shall be determined as follows.
(1) If the rent was the type who does not mandated by law to be registered will be considered an asset to the lessee before the lease is in possession of their rights than others.
(2) If a lease of any kind which are required by law shall be deemed to be registered for the registration of their lease before it is entitled to more than others.
(3) If the lease contains both of which must be registered and which does not require registration under the law, they are idols. He said tenants who have registered their rent is more than right. Unless another tenant is in possession of such property to rent with his registration date before then.
Section 544 property lease. Tenant to sublease or transfer any of their rights in such property, whether in whole or in part, to an outsider. You probably do not know what. Unless agreed otherwise in the contract.
If the tenant violates any provision of this act. The lessor may terminate the contract time.
Section 545 if the tenants renting the property which he sublet it to others like you fried a sublease that would be liable to the lessor directly. In this case, if the lease is a lease to rent first. You may find that the lease may be raised as a defense to the landlord can not.
However, this provision does not prohibit the lessor to enforce their rights against the tenant.
Supreme Court in 6275/2551.
The land lease is a lease dispute, one must fall. Subject to the provisions of Section 538 which requires a written document signed by the parties liable as a priority. When a defendant disputes the claim that the land lease from the plaintiff. Sublease contract with the plaintiff but did not do it. And appeared to have the lease in writing of any signature. The defendant's tenant. I can not sublease the defendant lean to the plaintiff. The defendants are accused in a land dispute must be based on the rights of the plaintiff. The defendant claimed that the State Railway of Thailand to terminate the lease of land to the plaintiff. That the plaintiff has no power to fight against the defendant has not expelled. When the plaintiff did not consent to the defendant in a land dispute anymore and has told them. Defendant from the land dispute. The defendant ignored the dispute was still in the land would be in violation. The plaintiff sued the defendant drove out of the land dispute and the defendant compensate the lost.
Supreme Court in 6962/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendants in the plaintiff's property after the lease expired. The plaintiff does not wish to give notice to the defendant and the defendant for the transfer of assets out. From the land of the plaintiff. But the defendant ignored. The move forced the defendant and the attendant removal of property from the estate of the plaintiff. The defendant to pay compensation of 1,000 baht from the date of filing until the defendant and the family will move into the property. It sued to force the defendant in the infringement. Shall not be sued under the contract rent property The plaintiff as the owner has the right to sue without a fighter. The land lease contract as evidence in court. Although the contract did not stamp duty is to listen to evidence.
Supreme Court in 6239/2551.
Defendant on the ground floor of a building lease from the plaintiff for a period of three years of the lease are not labeled. Defendant to the plaintiff the right to terminate the contract at any time. The defendant to terminate the contract before the expiry of the lease term must be imposed by Section 387 to 389.
Depriving the defendant fails to pay rent to the plaintiff within the time specified in the contract. The defendant then went to check late without warning, according to Section 204 paragraph two, the plaintiff shall have the authority to sue to force the defendant to pay the rent under the lease to the plaintiff under section 213 paragraph one, without the right to terminate the contract.
Supreme Court in 4899/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant drove the narrative action that Defendants dispute that the lease rent from the plaintiff and the period of lease to the plaintiff and the defendant does not want to live anymore. The defendants filed for eviction. The defendant paid the rent arrears and damages. The defendant testified that. Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant has agreed to lease it for 20 years, the defendant did not owe rent. Lease has not expired. The first is that the dispute. While both the plaintiff filed this lawsuit is. Leases of property dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant's due date of hire or not to appeal the decision by the reasoning in defense of the defendant in that manner. To listen to the defense of the accused have the right to lease rights of the plaintiff were both 20 years from the date of the contract, while the Court of Appeal considered the duration of the lease is expired when the plaintiffs either do not wish to be accused of renting. anymore. Dispute that the defendant had to leave the building. It is diagnosed by the time the claims of both plaintiffs. And against the defendant does not meet the case. But to make the case to be delayed unreasonably. The facts of the case was diagnosed. The decision of the Supreme Court agreed that such disputes without the need to go. To appeal the decision.
Agreement to allow the plaintiff and the amount of rent to be lower than reality. To avoid the tax, which is a function of Thai citizens under the law shall be contrary to the peace agreement and the morality of the people. The defendant can not raise a claim to such agreement as a defense against it. The plaintiff testified that the two will not refute the defendant's defense of such matter. The defendant and her husband rented the building to make room disputes and snooker room. Despite an investment of U.S. $ 7 million renovation to the building but it is an investment for the benefit of the defendant and her husband own the business. It may not be considered as a reciprocal agreement in more than a simple lease.
When the lease period, and the plaintiff sued the defendant did not intend to. Lease it. The case against the defendant in the building is in violation of the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal sentenced the defendant to pay the rent arrears and damages from the date wrong. Contract to sue and sue until after the defendant and family disputes out of the building. At the request of both plaintiff and the like.
Supreme Court in 3005/2551.
Defendant, plaintiff, a 10-year lease of the defendant, the nature of the building from a shop, restaurant, bar, beer is kind of done for the convenience of living in the leased property from the plaintiff only There is a reciprocal agreement in the lease than it is to make the defendant has the right to lease more than normal.
Supreme Court to 451/2551.
Defendant's land rights of the plaintiff area of 7 acres 2 to the park rental fee of 7,500 baht a lease once a year by the plaintiff to the defendant for over a period of about 15 years ago, but the defendant is liable. Land disputes, as agreed. Which adds more burden to the defendant of the contract normally. If the rental period is normally one year, shall give the defendant the benefit of the defendant was not worth the investment in land development and lemon plantations. At the end of the period of lease. The defendant agrees to the gardens and buildings that had grown up in a land dispute is the plaintiff. Benefit to the plaintiff by Plaintiff's own intent by the defendant's explicit consent to the disputed land for a period of 30 years in return. The lease is a lease agreement, reciprocal worse than normal.
Supreme Court to 10264/2550.
Permitting transfer of leasehold rights has clearly stated that I transferred the lease within three months, when the agreement made on August 31, 2534 The assignment of the lease, which must be made within 3 months, it will be due on or before November 30, 2534, the parties scheduled payment. debt is of course the day of this calendar. Held that the plaintiff's claim for a repayment period of the course. When it is known that all three defendants are not entitled to transfer the land to the plaintiff's case. If no payment is made within the given time period. It can force the plaintiff claims the plaintiff has since expired. As already mentioned, the period from December 1, 2534 as the default for all three defendants and the plaintiff may enforce claims under Section 193/12.
The transfer of leasehold rights in this case will have to battle the consent of the lessor before it, but the timing of the payment by the transfer of the leasehold agreement. Between the two parties was transferred to a transferee who is a party only. The Crown Property Bureau, which is transferred to the third party. Rent are not involved in the timing of any payment, but the agreement between the parties by letter of transfer of leasehold rights that To transfer the lease within 3 months to be effective.
Supreme Court in 7722/2550.
The plaintiff and defendant were both allowed to use or benefit in the area. The side and front of the building of the first plaintiff to the defendant's product label to a period of one year is limited. And the defendant agreed to pay compensation to the plaintiff and a defendant is 80,000 baht per year and will rent to them. Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant both as a rental property such as Section 537.
When the plaintiff is a commercial property that is permanently affixed to the land of the estate under Section 139 and the leased property is an area beside and in front of the building. Building walls with permanent fixtures in the commercial real estate property can be rented in accordance with the provisions of Section 538 to require proof of a written one. Signed by the parties liable as a priority. Otherwise, legal action has not
When the rental agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant both as evidence. Writing and signed by both defendants. Both the plaintiff can not sue to force the defendant to pay the rent by. Term of lease.
Supreme Court in 4260/2550.
Land formerly owned by the trustee of T. T. The Bank has entered into a lease for a period of 20 years at Bank of tenement buildings on the land. It is combined with the land under Section 146 the plaintiff bought the land from the trustee of T. During the term of the lease. The plaintiff is the owner of commercial building But at the end of the lease the land bank would be entitled to the land required to demolish the commercial building commercial building unless the Bank agrees to become the plaintiff. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff when the defendant has authorized the Town. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff, but the bank that owns the tenement house law has no power to limit the duration of the lease. When the lease expired. The duration of the dispute over the rent that would not fall to the plaintiff under section 569 on the plaintiff does not dispute that the defendant is in the room anymore. But she did not go out. The action against the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 7426/2550.
Mon 4 document is labeled "I, Mrs. B. (defendant) for a fee to sell your debt, A. (Plaintiff), according to the notice of the public reported it, but Mrs. B. (defendant. ) would reduce the debt to be paid only 70,000 baht is still not agreed. District attorneys must ask you (the plaintiff) will be payable before any comments. Therefore, the presence of the witnesses signed the same "as the defendant admitted that plaintiff's lease and rent arrears exist. The defendant signed a memorandum of lease shall be considered as evidence which would bring. Prosecution asks court by Section 538.
Supreme Court in 8196 - 8199/2549.
Clergy Act 2505 and section 31 paragraph three states that represent the abbot of the temple in the business generally. The act mandated that the measure will be measured by a seal. Both instruments appeared to establish a limited authority to require the seal of the plaintiff's attorney, even one that I have the power to appoint an MP and legal prosecution of the plaintiff that a sign would appear that Sun just does not. The first seal of the plaintiff by the defendant, it is perfectly legal to 2, which is why I have power of attorney during the prosecution of the plaintiff.
No. 2 (BE 2511) issued under the. Sangha Act of 2505.
Supreme Court to 368/2549.
Defendant to lease land for the corridor and the location of the market and lease the building or buildings on the plaintiff. The agreement to pay rent, taxes, fees or any other money the tenant must pay the overdue rent. Tenants must pay the extra money as a penalty rate of 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid amount. Leases Leases of property, such as the Section 537 agreement, the penalty is a property lease agreement. The penalty must be filed within 6 months from the filing of the defendant to return property to rent.
Supreme Court in 6472/2548.
Lease agreement between the defendant and the defendant Sat tenant rental rates charged 1235 baht per month on concern that the tenants in the mall as long as 20 years, the rental rate is a very small amount and it does not. The rent is usually normal. The total lease payment is U.S. $ 2,790,550 as part of the rent that the defendant in advance of the Sun because the lease agreements, the tenant has no right to receive royalty for all other cases. The lease can be terminated by reason of the death of the tenant in any way. When the lease is terminated by reason of the death of the tenant Sat defendant must reimburse the landlord for lease part of the rent paid in advance by the non-use of the plaintiff, an heir.
Supreme Court in 4809/2548.
Contract hire property is a reciprocal agreement with the plaintiff, a defendant voluntarily agreed to the terms of the contract, some differ from the provisions of the law. Which preserve the rights and benefits of their favorite business. It may have some advantages or disadvantages, and different from the provisions of the law. It is not a law relating to public order or good morals of the people. The contract is in force. Shall be bound by the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant in all three contracts is not regarded as an exercise in bad faith.
Supreme Court in 3345/2548.
Contract hire property of either party shall have the right to terminate the agreement in two cases of the contract by one. With the provisions of the law, another under Section 386 is not that when the lease is no requirement that the defendant has the right to terminate the lease. The defendant is not entitled to terminate the contract if they could.
Section 548 defines the duties and responsibilities of the landlord said. If the rent for the property which is leased by a state not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Lessee will pay to terminate the contract or if the fact that the provisions of that law. The defendant shall have the right to terminate the lease to the plaintiff.
Defendants to lease the car from the plaintiff to the defendant's customers. Lease requires that the plaintiff, the lessor is a parking pass for the defendant to 100 cards to the customer. If no parking tickets to cars parked at the defendant's customers will be charged the normal parking. Parking pass, it is important and it is the duty of the plaintiff to make parking tickets given to the defendant. The parking card is lost, and the plaintiff has made 83 new parking ticket to the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that the new parking card. The defendant shall be issued free of charge and the defendant to pay a parking pass to the plaintiff to be correct, it is another matter. The defendant has no right to terminate the contract because of it. When the defendant has no right to terminate the contract, the plaintiff and the defendant did not terminate the lease to the defendant. Lease remains in effect. The defendants are accused of not paying the rent becomes the default. The defendant did not provide the customers of the defendant's car parked in the building of the plaintiff. Not cause the defendant to pay the rent. Must be bound to pay the rent until the lease term.
Supreme Court in 1602/2548.
Subject matter of the plaintiff is the owner by inheritance of grade I entered a commercial building leased to the defendant disputes.It is a commitment that will allow tenants to renew for next time. It does not cause the contract. But this promise is not binding because it's not that I had to meet before I died when she learned that I proposed to death on July 5, 2537 before the expiry of the lease. Date December 31, 2538 case must be governed by Section 360, which stipulates that prohibits the provisions of Section 169 shall not apply to such a commitment I will not become effective and not as a legacy. The plaintiff, an heir is bound to comply with the provisions of Section 1599 and Section 1600 of the defendant's request for renewal has no effect. And does not cause a new lease. The plaintiff sued to terminate the lease and evict the defendant and family disputes out of the building.
When the defendant has no right in the tenement and family disputes after the contract ends. The defendant and the family remained in Town Court. It is like to live without rights possible. Violation of the plaintiff. Defendant is liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff's lack of a commercial building disputes.
Supreme Court in 1469/2548.
Subject matter has since been restored. The plaintiff entered into an agreement to rent a tenement district, District Court of the land and construction costs, the plaintiff does not help, as even I have to pay Sun, who sells commercial building disputes and the right to lease land to the District or b. the amount of 1.4 million baht from the contractor billed costs and the cost of construction Fri and Sat from construction to pay for it, it holds that B is paid for. Subject to the transfer of leasehold rights of individuals with their priority is from the Sun to Fri or Sat only B is used for the construction. The lease between the plaintiff and the district, such as a more conventional contract hire property in any way.
Supreme Court to 735/2548.
The text and details on the leased property. The duration of the lease, the lessee agrees to pay the rent on a monthly basis. Obligations of the lessee. Loss and damage of the leased property and contract rights to terminate the lease. The nature of the Civil and Commercial Code hire property without any showing that the parties have agreed to a purchase or lease the leased property. And does not appear that the rent is paid as part of the leased property. Although under Article 6, the lessee has the right to purchase the leased property. It is just a commitment to sell the leased property to the tenant wishes to buy in the future. The parties did not intend to transfer a property to rent, since the beginning of the lease. The agreement is the contract rent property
Termination hire property need not be in writing, the power to terminate the contract attorneys will not be made in writing. When the plaintiff a letter terminating the contract with the postal receipt showing that the plaintiff has terminated the contract lawfully.
Supreme Court in 8367/2547.
The defendant terminated the lease because the lease with the building and leased it to the building. The sub-contract the performance of others. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract immediately, under contract to the defendant. When the plaintiff to the defendant to terminate the lease and the lease agreement shall be binding. Defendant's property and the family must move from building to building, leasing and delivery. The night before the plaintiff in the plaintiff within the time prescribed. Although the plaintiff has notice to the defendant. Payment of rent arrears and after the plaintiff has terminated the lease to the defendant. And the defendant has acted in accordance with the payment of rent. Backlog within the stipulated time. The end result is a binding contract to back up non-binding.
Supreme Court in 4392/2547.
A. The defendant in a land dispute for a period of 30 years and will give the defendant a lease for another 30 years after the lease ends if the defendant is a defendant in a permit required by the S borrowing to 300,000 baht. land disputes.The defendant can not claim an interest, such as acquisition of land rights of the defendant that a contract is enforced by the state in the contract. Both types of contracts, even though the benefits are tied to each other. But as a result of the contract. Each party has the right to protect the future interests of the contract if the terms of the increased burden on the defendant as a tenant, the tenant shall be the duty of more than usual. A. Land lease dispute between the defendant to a reciprocal agreement that is worse than an ordinary lease.
Under the land lease agreement in the dispute is only whether the defendant committed the T. parties to a lease of land only. It does not cause the contract. Even if the lease is in writing and registered with the competent. But this promise was not binding because it s not that a defendant has been before the death of T.. When a defendant who has already know that s death before the 30-year leases are due to be mandated by Section 360, which stipulates that the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code Section 169 paragraph two shall have no binding commitment Rd.
Supreme Court in 3916/2547.
Land and land rent was about 1 meter deep in the abdomen had leased land for the construction of the defendant. The defendant and the reclamation of zinc, wooden picket around the leased land by the lease. The purpose of the defendant tenant. The lease agreement requires that Lessor agrees to lease the building to house the workers and the establishment of the rentable area. The regulations do not allow tenants to be done. It gives tenants the right to build it. The contract specifies that At the end of the lease, then what is done, it becomes property of the lessor, unless the two-story steel frame it. When the reclamation and building a fence to make up for the benefit of the tenants themselves. The worker had housing tenants were created by the defendant is entitled to temporary buildings on the land lease price is not high and the area of 1 rai 2 ngan 45 square wah penetration in sub-district of Sukhumvit Bangkok You can rent at least 20,000 baht per month to lease the rent is $ 5,000 per month to meet with the defendant to comply with licensing agreements and leases. The lease agreement is not reciprocal worse than an ordinary lease.
Supreme Court in 1035/2547.
Rental property in accordance with Section 537 does not apply if the lessor must own the property for rent. But the landlord have to rent a book, you can claim in court, so that the plaintiff sued to enforce the lease, the plaintiff made against each defendant. The leased property is not the plaintiff. But when she accepted a contract with the plaintiff. The defendant shall be bound by the agreement. When the defendant's breach of contract. The plaintiff sued the defendant.
The 3-year lease agreement will terminate at the end of the period. Without prior notice. To combat that, due to the defendant rented. The defendant remains in the land lease and pay rent to the plaintiff. I accept the plaintiff without objection. The plaintiff, the defendant has entered a new period without it. This means that the agreement on the term are not effective in the next section. The other terms as the original agreement, including the rent. If the lease is true that the defendant had no reason to pay higher rental rates as specified in the lease contract. And serve as proof of the defendant to pay the rent, there is no weight to the hearing and the evidence does not refute the plaintiff. So I do not think the plaintiff had a new lease. The defendant must be immediately removed from the leased land at the end of the period. The plaintiff need not have terminated the contract with the defendant before the Court.
Supreme Court in 1015/2547.
The dispute became public. For people who do not possess any rights to the disputed state. But the people together, they raised up against the other to take possession.
The plaintiff owns the interests in a public dispute. The defendant in that case I use to house the defendant would pay the rent or compensation to the plaintiff. The defendant admitted that the plaintiff has the right than the defendant. That the defendant possessed the right of the plaintiff's case, it is the possession of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to dispute over the defendant. When the plaintiff to the defendant does not wish to continue. The defendant must be removed from the land dispute.
The second paragraph of the decision by the general meeting of the Supreme Court (No. 1 / 2547).
Supreme Court in 2744/2546.
Defendant's house on land leased from the plaintiff's case. The land dispute under the defendant's house was built as a result of water erosion to the river bank erosion. Land dispute turned into a bank where the defendant continues to lease the land dispute with the plaintiff and the defendant still retains the right of land ownership disputes and reap the benefits of a rent dispute. Does not allow it to be a bank, the public will come to a mutual benefit to the land dispute is not that a bank which is public under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1304 (2) When the land lease dispute ended, and the lapse of time. granted the plaintiff to the defendant in a land dispute. The defendant has no right to dispute the plaintiff in the land anymore. The plaintiff has the right to sue to evict the defendant.
Supreme Court to 244/2546.
The Telephone Organization of the plaintiff is ordered to notify the tenant owed rent from the 30-day money back within 15 days if not paid by the letter of notification to the manager for not providing it. However, such rules and regulations for employees of the plaintiff in the action. That the defendant may not raise claims to have refused to pay rent arrears in any way. And that the defendant pay the plaintiff would pay the overdue rent a phone. Caused the plaintiff did not notice or suspend the service. In addition, the contract says. If the rental amount that the service is invalid. Tenants have the right to request validation required. The tenant must pay for the service.
Supreme Court in 2196/2545.
Leases of land disputes is scheduled for 6 years but have not registered with the competent authority. It claims the court was only 3 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 538, but after three years, she continued to land disputes with the plaintiff without further objection. Must be considered for the next with no time limit under Section 570, the plaintiff, the defendant can not terminate the lease at any time. But notice the first method as defined in Section 566 on the defendant received a letter terminating the contract, which is the date on which the plaintiff brought a lawsuit was filed a full 2 months is not required under Section 566 of the termination of Plaintiffs did not like. But in addition to a plaintiff alleging that the condition of the lease term. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendants are in arrears with the rent. The defendants do not have to fight in this case. The court heard that the defendant owed the plaintiff a notice to the defendant to pay the rent and the rent is due. To sue after a period of not less than 15 days in accordance with Article 560, paragraph two, the plaintiff has the right to sue to evict the defendant from the land lease and demanded the defendant to pay the rent arrears.
Supreme Court in 4486/2545.
Plaintiff to lease the commercial premises to the defendant. The agreement that the plaintiff will have to decorate the place according to the defendant. The plaintiff fails to install electrical systems. Approved by the defendant. The defendant's breach of contract. The contract stipulated that if plaintiff's breach of contract. Defendants have the right to shut shop. Water and electricity cut off in the mornings. Not infringe the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 7334/2540.
Leasehold property and the identity of the defendant, but when a. the lessor consents to the assignment of the lease by allowing the opposition to seize the official and auction like this. The opposition has the power to seize and auction the right to dispute the defendant's lease. According to the Bankruptcy Act 2483 Section 22.
Supreme Court to 383/2540.
Rental property is usually the lessor would mark the features of the tenants that would deserve the trust in the use of the leased property and to maintain the leased property or if the rights of tenants to have an exclusive on. tenant dies the lease shall be canceled to devolve to the heirs of the lease clause 4 states that the lease has not expired contracts who have the right to transfer the rental to others, but must pay compensation.the defendant did not entail any way.
Supreme Court in 2037/2539.
The building sub-contract dispute between the plaintiff by the liquidation of a sublease with Off. The lease is an agreement that Off. To make money from the compensation to the plaintiff. The term of the sublease agreement for the remainder of the lease contract of the plaintiff, the better. Or the rights and duties which the plaintiff has under the existing contract, which went off. They are all the terms of the sublease agreement between the plaintiff's side. The parties have entered into an agreement to be bound together. The intent of the parties shall be bound to the lease would need to meet the intent of the parties. The cause of the change to the sale or transfer of a leasehold. Especially considering the plaintiff's contract with the Village and District No. 6 and 7 it is seen that in seven cases, the landlord agreed to allow a tenant to lease all or part of the building to someone else. But in sub-clause 6 as if the tenant is transferred to another person.However, the plaintiff obtained the contract. Off. To bind a party to the landlord directly. Contract between the plaintiff with Off. It is not a transfer of leasehold rights. Plaintiffs are also entitled to a contract with the University and I was indeed referring to the lease originally made it.
Supreme Court in 1050/2539.
If the tenant leases misconduct by the leased property sublet to others. No agreement shall be made in the lease. The lessor to terminate the lease would love to be in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 544, paragraph two of which provided by it. Does not fall within the provisions of section 387, which is a general rule that the contract is terminated before the lease and before the lawsuit. Notice to the defendant that the plaintiff does not need to be a lease within a reasonable period of time as the first plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 6444/2537.
Sales contracts, lease contracts, which give rise to reciprocal debts between the plaintiff and defendant by defendant as a creditor in order to claim the cost of transfer of leasehold rights to the plaintiff. At the same time it is due to be tendered to the lessor the right to transfer the lease to the plaintiff, the plaintiff is a creditor of the defendant, the defendant claims that the assignment of the lease to the plaintiff. The debtor must pay the cost of transfer of leasehold rights of the defendant.The assignment of the lease dispute will affect on the rental agreement before you transfer it. The Court held that the lessor would not dispute the plaintiff's house. The defendant must be sentenced to the lessor of his intention to transfer the lease to the plaintiff.
