Section 715 of the mortgaged property as security for repayment inevitably with the following equipment is.
(1) Interest.
(2) compensation for non-payment.
(3) court fees on the mortgage.
Section 716 would cover the mortgage, the mortgaged property, which is everything. Despite the debt and then some.
Section 717 even if the mortgage assets will be divided into several sections. I still have a mortgage to cover all those sections of the same father.
Even better. I agree with the mortgagee. You are free to transfer any portion of the mortgage to do so. However, if consent is not registered. I will raise him up as a defense to any third party can not.
Section 718 would cover the mortgage, property, attaching all the property mortgaged. But the subject that you are limited to the following three.
Section 719 does not cover the land with houses built on land the mortgagor after the mortgage. Unless you have specifically stated in the contract that gives cover to
But however The mortgagee to sell the house and garage on land with. The mortgagee may use their preferential right to the land only.
Section 720 mortgage, house plant or other building which has been made on the soil or groundwater. In the land of others, he would not cover the land itself. Lives back together myself.
Section 721 does not cover the interest on the mortgage of the mortgaged property. Except on notice to the mortgagee to the mortgagor or the transferee, that their intention to enforce the mortgage.
Supreme Court to 10532/2551.
The defendant is a land title deed No. 12,844 to No. 2 after the defendant had mortgaged to the registration of a servitude agreement to the plaintiff by the defendant at the second site without permission. The servitude is registered in the land must not make it worse. The rights of the defendant, a second mortgagee in the mortgaged land under Section 722 of the fact that when a court can not sell it by auction to 9 times, but not yet registered to servitude. plaintiff If the price of the mortgaged property registration was reduced to servitude, the prejudice to the right of the defendant at the time the second mortgage. The rights of the defendant's second mortgage was registered before it is larger than the servitude of the plaintiff accused the two do not have to deliver the said land to the land official in Saraburi registered to servitude to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 8314 - 8315/2551.
Court of Justice, by typing the wrong deed. Court has the power to correct it. It was only resolved in the profile to match the reality. This is not the case in the material, which resulted in the verdict. Change.
The mortgaged land is divided into several plots before the plaintiff to prosecute. When the plaintiff as the mortgagee does not consent to the defendant when they land. Mortgage to the release of the mortgage. Must assume the mortgage continues to cover those parts that correspond to every part of the plaintiff's Section 717 are eligible to apply for a mortgage to convert the separation from the land. The mortgage is property mortgage. Not to enforce against the other assets of the defendant, the court will not According to the verdict.
Judgement in 3793/2551.
Section 719, paragraph two, the power to the mortgagee to the mortgagor based on the construction of buildings on the mortgaged property by public auction. The plaintiff is entitled to the buildings of the two defendants along with the land without obtaining specific legal meaning that the buildings on the land with a mortgage. And over or not a court, other than those specified in the court at all. The plaintiff need not present evidence to the court that the sale of the buildings on the land by public auction to make it easy to get the price whatsoever.
Supreme Court to 392/2550.
The first page contains a guarantee that a defendant is a defendant in two accounts are secured and that "50 million loan guarantee for U.S." In addition, the contract clause 1 states that "the request of the guarantor. Bank credit to the defendant to get a bank to pay the amount of 50 million meters under the U.S. "Article 2 states that" if the defendant is a guarantor, and hereinafter referred to as the debtor behavior. breach of contract provided. Or have acted otherwise. As a result, banks have to pay money or have been damaged in any other guarantor acceptable to the Bank to pay the full amount of the debt in full. The debtor owes a debt to banks and sharing "agreement of the two defendants that they intended to guarantee the payment obligations of the defendant, a debt of just under U.S. $ 50 million line of credit so only if the bank m. the defendant a credit limit that would be beyond the intent of the defendant at the second defendants, the two shall not be liable to the transferee bank, as well as the plaintiff claims. Payments exceed the amount guaranteed.
the date of the first defendant to pay interest with the plaintiff. The second defendant is liable not only interest from the date of filing.
Defendant owes a plaintiff in a debt under trust receipts, each separate from the total 28 cases where the debtor is bound to the plaintiff as a creditor in order to do so. Debt repayment is the same thing by many. The payment, if payment is not sufficient to guarantee the accused the two take off all debts have been exhausted. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 328, paragraph one, so the debt by the two defendants from enforcing payment of the defendant or the defendant, the second one took it from good to assume obligations under the trust receipts and any Including postage. Fees and stamp duty are just what they need to forced to comply. Rules under Section 328 paragraph one and paragraph two of the case.
equipment of the mortgage debt, the president said. The defendant shall have the effect of the mortgaged property as collateral for a loan in two payments, as many as 25 million of debt and interest payments of U.S. $ 25,00,000 as a plaintiff shall be entitled to enforce payment, including interest.
Judgement in 7569/2549.
Petitioner filed a petition for a claim under Section 289 of the second paragraph Civil Procedure Code the period that the petitioner filed a petition before the property is sold fried. When the auction first bid is not interested. Enforcement Officer to suspend sales and announced a new auction. The petitioner filed a petition for a mortgage loan before the date of the new auction. It is a petition before the auction the mortgaged property as required by law.
To apply for a mortgage loan before the Civil Procedure Code have the effect of Section 289 to sue to enforce the mortgage and, according to Section 715 (a) has provided property as security for repayment of a mortgage would. debt with interest. The land was promised a 19 percent interest per year, and agreed to submit the mortgage interest on a monthly basis, as specified in the agreement refers only to the mortgage principal, excluding interest on debt. Mortgagee is entitled to receive interest payments on the mortgage than the mortgage debt, but it's just a device. Forces one to consider the mortgage debt of a number. To be paid or not. And determine how much the interest rate. Petitioner is entitled to payment of principal and interest by the petitioner is entitled to recover money owed under the president.
Judgement in 5414/2549.
The mortgage debt as evidence that the defendant signed the letter as evidence that the plaintiff sued the defendant, who shall sign them. The loan amount is 800,000 baht on the defendant's contention and the evidence that refutes it and listen. The defendant had only 400,000 baht loan from the plaintiff, it is only making the amount of debt in the mortgage contract is invalid. Not the case that the mortgage is a document that is made wholly or partly false.
Judgement in 3987/2546.
The plaintiff made a loan to the defendant. The land under the Certificate and the building as collateral for a loan. And agree a contract at the end of the mortgage that the mortgagor the mortgage of land and buildings as collateral for loans of all types of mortgage debt the mortgagee in this time or will owe to the future, given the agreement said. means clear that the mortgage contract, unless such land as collateral to borrow the money from defendants to plaintiffs. The debt insurance is all that the plaintiff would be liable to the other defendants. When it appears that the defendant owed a debt purchase agreement, promissory note to the defendant. Held that the plaintiff has a debt to the defendant liable under the mortgage agreement exists. Although the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff recover of the defendant is complete. The mortgage did not settle the back end. Defendants have the right to redeem the mortgaged land to the plaintiff's unregistered.
Judgement in 3775/2546.
The defendant entered into a mortgage without the consent of his wife. It is just that. Wife sued the defendant may ask the court to revoke the legal mortgage under the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1480, but as long as the mortgage has not been revoked by the court. Would remain in force under the law.
Loan agreements and mortgage contracts. The different types of transactions that can be separated from each other. The plaintiff sued the defendant to pay the principal and interest under the loan agreements. When the loan is not listening to the evidence. I can not take the mortgage interest rate stipulated in the contract was forced to borrow this money.
Judgement in 5941/2545.
Plaintiff and the defendant was indicted for the petitioner to withdraw legal dispute between the plaintiff and defendant, the case of mortgage assets to the court ruled that a lawsuit under Section 1480 shall terminate and the fact that the plaintiff can not mortgage the property dispute. in bad faith. There is no legal reason to revoke a mortgage. The judge dismissed. The case would bind the parties in accordance with Section 145, paragraph Civil Procedure Code when she could not withdraw their legal dispute with a mortgage. Legal mortgage, property disputes, it is perfectly legal. The plaintiff, a mortgage lender shall have the right to remove any legal rights at all. The right to mortgage the property to cover the mortgage, all things in accordance with Section 716 and the real rights to lean to the general public.said. To affect the plaintiff, the parties do not. Petitioner is not entitled to the property of their money from the auction of property disputes.
Judgement in 4038/2543.
Enforcement Officer implementation of the court by the seizure and auction of the mortgaged property, including the proceeds from the auction to pay the plaintiff by the verdict. It is made possible as a representative plaintiff, the money received from the auction of the mortgaged property Enforcement Officer of the defendant at a public auction Enforcement Officer the plaintiff to receive payment in accordance with the verdict. The plaintiff is entitled to interest on mortgage debt to the auction only. The average of the delay Enforcement Officer accounting years from the date of sale because you have to fight against the auction prices. The plaintiff objected to the account in the amount of preferred stock in mortgage lenders that the plaintiff will receive. The defendant has been involved or contributed to the delay Enforcement Officer account the average defendant is not liable to pay interest to the plaintiff after the auction of the mortgaged property longer.
Judgement in 1901/2542.
Defendants 2 to 4, mortgaged property, the defendant's liability insurance with a limit of 1.12 million baht and 870,000 baht to 710,000 baht, respectively, had 2 to 4 are responsible for the payment of the mortgage contract. The agreement stipulates that the end of the mortgage principal. Contract, the mortgagee shall not be disqualified for an early mortgage payments. That exceed the limit set because of the interest. Or loan equipment. Aggregate exceed the limit prescribed it. This agreement is valid. The mortgage interest on debt and equipment shall be liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 715 is the agreement that the mortgagor is liable for payments that exceed the limit. The mortgage is why it is an agreement that the mortgage does not have the exact amount or amounts to max out their mortgage, par insurance is a violation of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 708 and the way to avoid it. The fee for registering a mortgage is void, no force. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce mortgage payments, the limit for the particular interest or Total income exceeds the limit, the device only.
Judgement in 2826/2541.
Despite the division into several plots of land mortgaged to the plaintiff to prosecute them. When the plaintiff did not appear as a mortgagee has agreed to allow the defendant to divide the land free from mortgage to mortgage. Must assume the mortgage continues to cover all those sections that are divided by Section 717 plaintiff has the right to mortgage the land to be converted to correspond to a mortgage of land and property mortgage.
Judgement at 715/2540.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 715 property, which mortgage there is insurance to pay for the equipment cost is the interest and the mortgage contract states that the mortgage, the interest 15 percent per year by the interest, monthly interest charge for was compounded by the other bank's agreement to comply with the contract extension and is part of the mortgage contract, the contract at the end of the mortgage contract stipulates that the mortgagor will pay interest at a rate of 15 per cent. in the amount of the mortgage debt, interest payments will be charged at the daily balance and interest on the mortgage every month, always willing to go if it fails to pay interest on the mortgages allow the interest owed 5 years.
Judgement in 4175/2539.
The defendant in this case the plaintiff sued to force seized mortgage include property disputes in this case, the Companies. Debt mortgage auction, including property disputes, according to the company. The debtor is situated so that when the plaintiff is in a position to be. has been transferred to the dispute may be at risk to lose the right to be transferred to the dispute, if it is the defendant in court by public auction the plaintiff shall have the right to use the debt to the defendant rather than companies. under the Civil and Commercial Code. Section 230. Mortgage debt to the company. The defendant in this case the remaining amount of 5,396,629.37, but the mortgaged property as security for payment of debts, land disputes, this left only to one that will force the defendant to pay the debt, redeem the mortgage. All payments must be at the company. Debt owed to the defendant in the amount of 5,396,629.37 U.S. Court to force the defendant to pay the redemption of mortgage is the amount of 386,784.60 U.S. can not be in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 716 and 717, paragraph one, the plaintiff has no power to sue the defendant to redeem the mortgage of the plaintiff. the defendant is less than the debt, creditors are not.
Judgement in 2410/2524.
Homes and land in any land. It is an amalgamation of the plot. If no evidence is otherwise no one owns any land. It is the owner of the house, planted in the plot, so the mortgage or transfer of land if it did not appear to have a mortgage or transfer it without including the acquisition of land and a house. It is a home mortgage or transfer the land in the land itself. Without stating that the mortgage or transfer them to the buildings on the land itself.
Judgement in 2521/2516.
The owner of the property but there is no right to the property to mortgage.
Even at the end of the mortgage contract, a message stating that the building mortgage is a mortgage that has grown up with the mortgage. Said it would mean a building owned by the mortgagor. Not include property owned by third parties. Mortgagee is not entitled to receive payment from the proceeds from the sale of a third building, which was built on land belonging to the mortgagor.
Judgement of the 1096 - 1097/2510.
3 houses were about the same body as the latter. The fence on the side contacting the fence with a patio in front of the door into the patio and the owner of the residence is the same house for many years and the building of a house after a cross into the house of another. one. Eaves trough body have a common interface, although the 3 behind the house are planted the same year. I heard that the third house after the merger of each other.
(1) Interest.
(2) compensation for non-payment.
(3) court fees on the mortgage.
Section 716 would cover the mortgage, the mortgaged property, which is everything. Despite the debt and then some.
Section 717 even if the mortgage assets will be divided into several sections. I still have a mortgage to cover all those sections of the same father.
Even better. I agree with the mortgagee. You are free to transfer any portion of the mortgage to do so. However, if consent is not registered. I will raise him up as a defense to any third party can not.
Section 718 would cover the mortgage, property, attaching all the property mortgaged. But the subject that you are limited to the following three.
Section 719 does not cover the land with houses built on land the mortgagor after the mortgage. Unless you have specifically stated in the contract that gives cover to
But however The mortgagee to sell the house and garage on land with. The mortgagee may use their preferential right to the land only.
Section 720 mortgage, house plant or other building which has been made on the soil or groundwater. In the land of others, he would not cover the land itself. Lives back together myself.
Section 721 does not cover the interest on the mortgage of the mortgaged property. Except on notice to the mortgagee to the mortgagor or the transferee, that their intention to enforce the mortgage.
Supreme Court to 10532/2551.
The defendant is a land title deed No. 12,844 to No. 2 after the defendant had mortgaged to the registration of a servitude agreement to the plaintiff by the defendant at the second site without permission. The servitude is registered in the land must not make it worse. The rights of the defendant, a second mortgagee in the mortgaged land under Section 722 of the fact that when a court can not sell it by auction to 9 times, but not yet registered to servitude. plaintiff If the price of the mortgaged property registration was reduced to servitude, the prejudice to the right of the defendant at the time the second mortgage. The rights of the defendant's second mortgage was registered before it is larger than the servitude of the plaintiff accused the two do not have to deliver the said land to the land official in Saraburi registered to servitude to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 8314 - 8315/2551.
Court of Justice, by typing the wrong deed. Court has the power to correct it. It was only resolved in the profile to match the reality. This is not the case in the material, which resulted in the verdict. Change.
The mortgaged land is divided into several plots before the plaintiff to prosecute. When the plaintiff as the mortgagee does not consent to the defendant when they land. Mortgage to the release of the mortgage. Must assume the mortgage continues to cover those parts that correspond to every part of the plaintiff's Section 717 are eligible to apply for a mortgage to convert the separation from the land. The mortgage is property mortgage. Not to enforce against the other assets of the defendant, the court will not According to the verdict.
Judgement in 3793/2551.
Section 719, paragraph two, the power to the mortgagee to the mortgagor based on the construction of buildings on the mortgaged property by public auction. The plaintiff is entitled to the buildings of the two defendants along with the land without obtaining specific legal meaning that the buildings on the land with a mortgage. And over or not a court, other than those specified in the court at all. The plaintiff need not present evidence to the court that the sale of the buildings on the land by public auction to make it easy to get the price whatsoever.
Supreme Court to 392/2550.
The first page contains a guarantee that a defendant is a defendant in two accounts are secured and that "50 million loan guarantee for U.S." In addition, the contract clause 1 states that "the request of the guarantor. Bank credit to the defendant to get a bank to pay the amount of 50 million meters under the U.S. "Article 2 states that" if the defendant is a guarantor, and hereinafter referred to as the debtor behavior. breach of contract provided. Or have acted otherwise. As a result, banks have to pay money or have been damaged in any other guarantor acceptable to the Bank to pay the full amount of the debt in full. The debtor owes a debt to banks and sharing "agreement of the two defendants that they intended to guarantee the payment obligations of the defendant, a debt of just under U.S. $ 50 million line of credit so only if the bank m. the defendant a credit limit that would be beyond the intent of the defendant at the second defendants, the two shall not be liable to the transferee bank, as well as the plaintiff claims. Payments exceed the amount guaranteed.
the date of the first defendant to pay interest with the plaintiff. The second defendant is liable not only interest from the date of filing.
Defendant owes a plaintiff in a debt under trust receipts, each separate from the total 28 cases where the debtor is bound to the plaintiff as a creditor in order to do so. Debt repayment is the same thing by many. The payment, if payment is not sufficient to guarantee the accused the two take off all debts have been exhausted. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 328, paragraph one, so the debt by the two defendants from enforcing payment of the defendant or the defendant, the second one took it from good to assume obligations under the trust receipts and any Including postage. Fees and stamp duty are just what they need to forced to comply. Rules under Section 328 paragraph one and paragraph two of the case.
equipment of the mortgage debt, the president said. The defendant shall have the effect of the mortgaged property as collateral for a loan in two payments, as many as 25 million of debt and interest payments of U.S. $ 25,00,000 as a plaintiff shall be entitled to enforce payment, including interest.
Judgement in 7569/2549.
Petitioner filed a petition for a claim under Section 289 of the second paragraph Civil Procedure Code the period that the petitioner filed a petition before the property is sold fried. When the auction first bid is not interested. Enforcement Officer to suspend sales and announced a new auction. The petitioner filed a petition for a mortgage loan before the date of the new auction. It is a petition before the auction the mortgaged property as required by law.
To apply for a mortgage loan before the Civil Procedure Code have the effect of Section 289 to sue to enforce the mortgage and, according to Section 715 (a) has provided property as security for repayment of a mortgage would. debt with interest. The land was promised a 19 percent interest per year, and agreed to submit the mortgage interest on a monthly basis, as specified in the agreement refers only to the mortgage principal, excluding interest on debt. Mortgagee is entitled to receive interest payments on the mortgage than the mortgage debt, but it's just a device. Forces one to consider the mortgage debt of a number. To be paid or not. And determine how much the interest rate. Petitioner is entitled to payment of principal and interest by the petitioner is entitled to recover money owed under the president.
Judgement in 5414/2549.
The mortgage debt as evidence that the defendant signed the letter as evidence that the plaintiff sued the defendant, who shall sign them. The loan amount is 800,000 baht on the defendant's contention and the evidence that refutes it and listen. The defendant had only 400,000 baht loan from the plaintiff, it is only making the amount of debt in the mortgage contract is invalid. Not the case that the mortgage is a document that is made wholly or partly false.
Judgement in 3987/2546.
The plaintiff made a loan to the defendant. The land under the Certificate and the building as collateral for a loan. And agree a contract at the end of the mortgage that the mortgagor the mortgage of land and buildings as collateral for loans of all types of mortgage debt the mortgagee in this time or will owe to the future, given the agreement said. means clear that the mortgage contract, unless such land as collateral to borrow the money from defendants to plaintiffs. The debt insurance is all that the plaintiff would be liable to the other defendants. When it appears that the defendant owed a debt purchase agreement, promissory note to the defendant. Held that the plaintiff has a debt to the defendant liable under the mortgage agreement exists. Although the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff recover of the defendant is complete. The mortgage did not settle the back end. Defendants have the right to redeem the mortgaged land to the plaintiff's unregistered.
Judgement in 3775/2546.
The defendant entered into a mortgage without the consent of his wife. It is just that. Wife sued the defendant may ask the court to revoke the legal mortgage under the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1480, but as long as the mortgage has not been revoked by the court. Would remain in force under the law.
Loan agreements and mortgage contracts. The different types of transactions that can be separated from each other. The plaintiff sued the defendant to pay the principal and interest under the loan agreements. When the loan is not listening to the evidence. I can not take the mortgage interest rate stipulated in the contract was forced to borrow this money.
Judgement in 5941/2545.
Plaintiff and the defendant was indicted for the petitioner to withdraw legal dispute between the plaintiff and defendant, the case of mortgage assets to the court ruled that a lawsuit under Section 1480 shall terminate and the fact that the plaintiff can not mortgage the property dispute. in bad faith. There is no legal reason to revoke a mortgage. The judge dismissed. The case would bind the parties in accordance with Section 145, paragraph Civil Procedure Code when she could not withdraw their legal dispute with a mortgage. Legal mortgage, property disputes, it is perfectly legal. The plaintiff, a mortgage lender shall have the right to remove any legal rights at all. The right to mortgage the property to cover the mortgage, all things in accordance with Section 716 and the real rights to lean to the general public.said. To affect the plaintiff, the parties do not. Petitioner is not entitled to the property of their money from the auction of property disputes.
Judgement in 4038/2543.
Enforcement Officer implementation of the court by the seizure and auction of the mortgaged property, including the proceeds from the auction to pay the plaintiff by the verdict. It is made possible as a representative plaintiff, the money received from the auction of the mortgaged property Enforcement Officer of the defendant at a public auction Enforcement Officer the plaintiff to receive payment in accordance with the verdict. The plaintiff is entitled to interest on mortgage debt to the auction only. The average of the delay Enforcement Officer accounting years from the date of sale because you have to fight against the auction prices. The plaintiff objected to the account in the amount of preferred stock in mortgage lenders that the plaintiff will receive. The defendant has been involved or contributed to the delay Enforcement Officer account the average defendant is not liable to pay interest to the plaintiff after the auction of the mortgaged property longer.
Judgement in 1901/2542.
Defendants 2 to 4, mortgaged property, the defendant's liability insurance with a limit of 1.12 million baht and 870,000 baht to 710,000 baht, respectively, had 2 to 4 are responsible for the payment of the mortgage contract. The agreement stipulates that the end of the mortgage principal. Contract, the mortgagee shall not be disqualified for an early mortgage payments. That exceed the limit set because of the interest. Or loan equipment. Aggregate exceed the limit prescribed it. This agreement is valid. The mortgage interest on debt and equipment shall be liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 715 is the agreement that the mortgagor is liable for payments that exceed the limit. The mortgage is why it is an agreement that the mortgage does not have the exact amount or amounts to max out their mortgage, par insurance is a violation of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 708 and the way to avoid it. The fee for registering a mortgage is void, no force. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce mortgage payments, the limit for the particular interest or Total income exceeds the limit, the device only.
Judgement in 2826/2541.
Despite the division into several plots of land mortgaged to the plaintiff to prosecute them. When the plaintiff did not appear as a mortgagee has agreed to allow the defendant to divide the land free from mortgage to mortgage. Must assume the mortgage continues to cover all those sections that are divided by Section 717 plaintiff has the right to mortgage the land to be converted to correspond to a mortgage of land and property mortgage.
Judgement at 715/2540.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 715 property, which mortgage there is insurance to pay for the equipment cost is the interest and the mortgage contract states that the mortgage, the interest 15 percent per year by the interest, monthly interest charge for was compounded by the other bank's agreement to comply with the contract extension and is part of the mortgage contract, the contract at the end of the mortgage contract stipulates that the mortgagor will pay interest at a rate of 15 per cent. in the amount of the mortgage debt, interest payments will be charged at the daily balance and interest on the mortgage every month, always willing to go if it fails to pay interest on the mortgages allow the interest owed 5 years.
Judgement in 4175/2539.
The defendant in this case the plaintiff sued to force seized mortgage include property disputes in this case, the Companies. Debt mortgage auction, including property disputes, according to the company. The debtor is situated so that when the plaintiff is in a position to be. has been transferred to the dispute may be at risk to lose the right to be transferred to the dispute, if it is the defendant in court by public auction the plaintiff shall have the right to use the debt to the defendant rather than companies. under the Civil and Commercial Code. Section 230. Mortgage debt to the company. The defendant in this case the remaining amount of 5,396,629.37, but the mortgaged property as security for payment of debts, land disputes, this left only to one that will force the defendant to pay the debt, redeem the mortgage. All payments must be at the company. Debt owed to the defendant in the amount of 5,396,629.37 U.S. Court to force the defendant to pay the redemption of mortgage is the amount of 386,784.60 U.S. can not be in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 716 and 717, paragraph one, the plaintiff has no power to sue the defendant to redeem the mortgage of the plaintiff. the defendant is less than the debt, creditors are not.
Judgement in 2410/2524.
Homes and land in any land. It is an amalgamation of the plot. If no evidence is otherwise no one owns any land. It is the owner of the house, planted in the plot, so the mortgage or transfer of land if it did not appear to have a mortgage or transfer it without including the acquisition of land and a house. It is a home mortgage or transfer the land in the land itself. Without stating that the mortgage or transfer them to the buildings on the land itself.
Judgement in 2521/2516.
The owner of the property but there is no right to the property to mortgage.
Even at the end of the mortgage contract, a message stating that the building mortgage is a mortgage that has grown up with the mortgage. Said it would mean a building owned by the mortgagor. Not include property owned by third parties. Mortgagee is not entitled to receive payment from the proceeds from the sale of a third building, which was built on land belonging to the mortgagor.
Judgement of the 1096 - 1097/2510.
3 houses were about the same body as the latter. The fence on the side contacting the fence with a patio in front of the door into the patio and the owner of the residence is the same house for many years and the building of a house after a cross into the house of another. one. Eaves trough body have a common interface, although the 3 behind the house are planted the same year. I heard that the third house after the merger of each other.
