Section 728 is mandatory on the mortgage. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable notice is given in it. If you ignore the bad and the debtor fails to comply with the notice. Mortgagee will be filed with the court to allow judges to order the seized property and mortgages. The auction also.
Section 729 in addition to solutions like those provided in the previous section. Mortgagee also like to call the Sealant Evaluation mortgaged property subject to the conditions. This can be the following.
(1) the debtor has not been sent interest rates for up to five years.
(2) the mortgage does not show the court is satisfied that the price of the property outstanding, and the amount of flooding.
(3) no other mortgages. Or other preferential rights registered over the same property itself.
Section 730 on any one single property to the mortgagee a mortgage together. He shall order the mortgagee by date and time of registration. And before the mortgagee shall be a debt prior to the mortgagee.
Section 731 of the mortgagee who will enforce the rights of their people before the damage to the mortgagee. You probably do not know what.
Section 732 auction of the mortgaged property which is the net amount of money and how much you use them. Mortgagee in order. And if there is money remaining. Then delivered to the mortgagor.
Section 733 if the mortgaged property and such property is approximately Hlud less than the amount outstanding. Pay is good. If the property is sold off the mortgage debt. The net amount is less than the amount due upon it. How much due to the lack of funds shall not be liable for the money.
Section 734 if the mortgage assets to guarantee debt, but a lot of things only and does not specify the order that you remember that the mortgagee to enforce their rights to the property that either all or only some things. But you shall not do so many things to the property than it needed to repay the debt. The rights of their own.
You shall be distributed according to a specified amount of mortgage assets and other such things.
However, if the mortgagee to enforce their rights to the property, but only one thing soon becomes the mortgagee to repay a portion of its assets, all of that. In that case, the mortgagee will be deemed to be the next person in order to inherit. The rights of the mortgagee and the mortgagor shall be replaced before, but just. The amount which the mortgagee who will receive from the other assets of such provisions in the preceding paragraph.
Section 735 on the mortgage, the mortgagee shall not apply to the assignee of the mortgage assets. You must mail notice to the transferee in advance, one month before that. The mortgage.
Supreme Court in 6829/2551.
The first defendant and the plaintiff entered into a loan agreement, mortgage, land and building as security for such debt by the end of the mortgage agreement that If the plaintiff the mortgage money to pay the defendant a permit shall pay the deficiency until the defendant 2 is the wife by the law of the defendant that a consent to the defendant that a contract to recover the funds. The loans are made aware that the defendant has caused an increase in debt and have ratified it. Debt it owes the husband and wife as joint debtors under Section 1490 (4) The defendant's second wife to a husband with the defendant to the plaintiff liable to pay such debts as well.
Section 728 states just that. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable as defined in the notice. Not provided that notification shall be made in writing by providing the mortgage. The lawyer told the mortgage so they do not need to be made under section 798 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 3802/2551.
Mortgage debt you apply for a mortgage loan from the auction of the mortgaged property to be taken. The proceeds from the loan before its creditors under Section 289 Civil Procedure Code without prior notice to the mortgagee. The lawsuit is not directly applicable to such mortgage loan prior to the Section 728.
Supreme Court in 2574/2551.
The court initially sentenced the four defendants together with interest payments to the plaintiff. If you do not pay the mortgage, the land of the defendant at a public auction. If money is not enough to seize the assets of the defendant, the defendant reached a settlement 3 and 4, must be jointly liable for all debts must be paid to the plaintiff. When the plaintiff shall pay the mortgaged property from the defendant an amount insufficient to pay the verdict. Plaintiffs would be forced to repay some of the assets of the defendants 3 and 4, as Section 214.
Supreme Court in 1535/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable to pay a debt as the mortgage loan and overdraft. And asked the defendant to 2 to 7, as assignee of the property by the mortgage liability attached to the mortgagee is entitled to. Receive payment from the mortgage asset, mortgage by the transferee of the mortgaged property in accordance with Section 735 of the case and the obligations which can not be separated from each other by Civil Procedure Code Section 59. (1) the defendant's two prescription claims for more than five years of unpaid interest to fight. As a result of a defendant as well.
Section 745 stipulates that "the mortgagee to the mortgagor. Even when the insurance shall terminate the debt already. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage, not exceeding five years "means. Mortgagee can not enforce a mortgage debt would terminate the insurance or not, but shall not enforce against the interest owed on the mortgage debt of more than five years, so even the president does not expire. Plaintiff would be entitled to claim interest from the first defendant owed no more than five years.
Supreme Court in 1580/2551.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Accused the plaintiff of the 4.2 million loans by the land and the building was mortgaged to the plaintiff as collateral for a loan. The plaintiff and the defendant has made a loan agreement to pay U.S. $ 3.5 million mortgage at an amount of force the defendant to repay the loan plus interest under the mortgage and the mortgage. By request, the lawsuit said. If the defendant does not pay the mortgage of land and buildings at the public auction. Money to pay the plaintiff, the plaintiff sued the mortgage would be the case. The only mortgage of property. Does not apply to debt claims of the ordinary. The land is not labeled as such. If the plaintiff shall pay the auction of the mortgaged property are insufficient to pay debt service. The plaintiff was forced to remove from the other assets of the defendant as well. The court sentenced the defendant to pay the debt and the mortgage. Plaintiff shall pay the amount of their mortgage debt is not enough, according to court the plaintiff had no legal right to remove it from the other assets of the defendant under Section 733.
Supreme Court in 1975/2551.
Civil Procedure Code Section 289 does not limit the rights of the mortgagee that the mortgage must be filed on or before that. Judgement creditors must follow to obtain a mortgage loan is. When a defendant fails to repay the loan contract and mortgage contract to the petitioner, the mortgagee. Shall apply to the court under Section 289 has been paying the mortgage.
Notice required by Section 728 mortgage to the mortgagee for the prosecution to the court to allow judges to order the seizure. Mortgaged property. But in the case of applying for a mortgage loan before the Civil Procedure Code Section 289 is not a lawsuit to force the mortgage will sequester them. She also apply for a mortgage loan without a letter of notice to the defendant before a debtor.
Supreme Court in 1580/2551.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Accused the plaintiff of the 4.2 million loans by the land and the building was mortgaged to the plaintiff as collateral for a loan. The plaintiff and the defendant has made a loan agreement to pay U.S. $ 3.5 million mortgage at an amount of force the defendant to repay the loan plus interest under the mortgage and the mortgage. By request, the lawsuit said. If the defendant does not pay the mortgage of land and buildings at the public auction. Money to pay the plaintiff, the plaintiff sued the mortgage would be the case. The only mortgage of property. Does not apply to debt claims of the ordinary. The land is not labeled as such. If the plaintiff shall pay the auction of the mortgaged property are insufficient to pay debt service. The plaintiff was forced to remove from the other assets of the defendant as well. The court sentenced the defendant to pay the debt and the mortgage. Plaintiff shall pay the amount of their mortgage debt is not enough, according to court the plaintiff had no legal right to remove it from the other assets of the defendant under Section 733.
Supreme Court in 8260/2550.
The defendant owed the plaintiff a debt owed the defendant money to pay to the plaintiff, without any conditions, because the debt will be successful as any. Debtor's obligations to its creditors, it is directly under the first paragraph of Section 208 on the defendant by the plaintiff's settlement offer to transfer the mortgaged property in lieu of cash payment. It's not a legitimate obligations. Plaintiffs have no reason to reject a settlement that the plaintiff did not constitute a default under Section 207.
Section 733 of the Civil and Commercial Code provisions, presumably the intent of the parties in particular. It is not about morality as it is popular among the general public or the traditions of the society is no provision of law relating to public order or good morals of the plaintiff may agree with the defendant, otherwise a special addition to the Section 733 law. them.
Supreme Court to 932/2550.
Mortgage insurance is a contract a debt to assets retained by the president and mortgage debt. The device of the debt. This may be split into different parts separately from each other. Creditors, therefore, prefer to use the debt-claim for the repayment of capital is the property of the debtor under Section 213 or to enforce preferred mortgage is a forced liquidation of assets to any mortgage under section 728. The law does not apply in cases where a mortgage already. A creditor will sue to force the debtor to the debt capital under Section 214 is not the only law that If the plaintiff is entitled to enforce the rights of the plaintiff's mortgage would fall under the provisions of Section 733 and Section 733 does not apply if the plaintiff is entitled to sue the mortgage, but the only way. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the loan under the loan agreement. When the defendant fails to pay the debt to the plaintiff by the verdict. The plaintiff shall be entitled to the assets of the defendant in court, including the mortgaged property. The plaintiff is not entitled to court, but only the land mortgaged as security. Loans only.
Supreme Court to 460/2550.
Plaintiffs filed this case more than one year from the date the plaintiff knew or should have known about the death of the section. Ehgamrdk the debt under the loan, which terminate the debt. This is because the loan is registered with the land as security for a debt under the loan, which will terminate the debt. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce payment of the mortgaged property under the third paragraph of Section 1754 and Section 193/27, but the only property that is mortgaged. May be forced to find other assets of the channel. Ehgamrdk can not. The land contract is an agreement to end the contract of insurance and a mortgage. Insurance will be labeled. By the time the mortgage, the mortgaged property is sold for less than the net amount. The amount owed on the equipment. How much money do not have a mortgage and the debtor shall be responsible for the lack of money. That the amount given to the mortgagee.
The plaintiff is a commercial bank. The maximum rate of interest from customers. Bank of Thailand and the Commercial Banking Act, Section 14, it announced that it is against the law for the court to recognize them. The fact that the parties have a duty attest The Court has ordered that documents pertaining to plaintiff's interest. The documents from the defendant is forbidden to listen to as Section 90, the plaintiff did not appeal Civil Procedure Code such order of the Court of First Instance held that it is possible. Attest that the plaintiff has no evidence. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest rates as provided by law. The interest is void. The plaintiff shall be entitled to charge interest at a rate of 7.5 percent per year during the default under Section 224.
Supreme Court in 6116 - 6117/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 734, paragraph two, as is the case with many mortgage assets to guarantee debt, one by one. Set the order. When the mortgagee the right to property shall be distributed to all at once. The burden of mortgage debt to the amount specified for that particular property. But Barker is not mortgagee to exercise such rights. When the plaintiff was only an ordinary creditor is entitled to receive payment on the debt. Mortgage to the petitioner still has money left from the auction only. The plaintiff has no right under any such claim.
Supreme Court in 3535/2550.
Land contract between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 of the Revenue Department as security for repayment of outstanding tax debt there is no agreement that the first defendant. If the property is sold the mortgage to the amount of net debt to less than Amount owed each other. How much money is still a lack of a defendant liable for the money. The exemption provisions of Section 733 may be in the provisions of this Section is that if the mortgage loan amount is not enough that a defendant is not liable in respect of the Section 733 does not have to. limit the use of force only if the debtor's assets as a mortgage.
Supreme Court in 1657/2550.
Section 728 stipulates that "when the mortgage is. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor before ... "is not provided. Notice shall be in writing mortgages. Therefore, the plaintiff's attorney to the. Written notice of the mortgage, the defendant does not fall within the provisions of Section 798 paragraph one, given the agent must be in writing on that. A notice of the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant received the letter. I did not notice. Payment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's lawsuit. The plaintiff accepts that the notice provisions of the new mortgage. The notice of the plaintiff. Held that the plaintiff, which it ratified in accordance with Section 823 shall constitute notice to the plaintiff by the then mortgage.
Supreme Court to 932/2550.
Mortgage insurance is a contract a debt to assets retained by the president and mortgage debt. The device of the debt. This may be split into different parts separately from each other. Creditors, therefore, prefer to use the debt-claim for the repayment of capital is the property of the debtor under Section 213 or to enforce preferred mortgage is a forced liquidation of assets to any mortgage under section 728. The law does not apply in cases where a mortgage already. A creditor will sue to force the debtor to the debt capital under Section 214 is not the only law that If the plaintiff is entitled to enforce the rights of the plaintiff's mortgage would fall under the provisions of Section 733 and Section 733 does not apply if the plaintiff is entitled to sue the mortgage, but the only way. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the loan under the loan agreement. When the defendant fails to pay the debt to the plaintiff by the verdict. The plaintiff shall be entitled to the assets of the defendant in court, including the mortgaged property. The plaintiff is not entitled to court, but only the land mortgaged as security. Loans only.
Supreme Court to 462/2550.
Section 728 provided just that. When the mortgage. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor before that. To pay the debt within a reasonable time only. Plaintiffs do not have a mortgage on the property with notice. When the defendant is both the debtor and the mortgaged property which they know already registered. Mortgage as security for repayment of the loan, the plaintiff is. No. 54/225 for my studio apartment, No. 0225, the notice of the mortgaged property is a condominium unit at 0225 it was clear that a printing error, which is a little flat. When the plaintiff has notice to the defendant to redeem the mortgage within 30 days from the date of receipt of such books. It held that the mortgagee has given a letter to the debtor that the debt within Reasonable time under the provisions of such laws. Notice the mortgage of the plaintiff was unlawful.
Agreement at the end of the mortgage 5. States that do not handle it ... if the mortgage insurance and government mortgage insurance and I have agreed to pay a mortgage insurance premium paid to the mortgagee to pay the full net. within 1 month from the date of the mortgagee notice ... Under the agreement shows that the plaintiff has the right to require the defendant to pay premiums. Insurance only when it advances to pay the premium only. There is no right to require the defendant to pay the premium in the future that are not yet due.
Supreme Court in 5484/2549.
To be sued again by Civil Procedure Code Section 148 must be the case that the court has sentenced a final order by any of the issues. Any reason then. The same pair was indicted in the demolition issue. Based on the same grounds that it did not. Red Bank, 9861/2544, but for a number of civil court cases, the plaintiff sued to enforce loan repayment, plus interest and forced Sun to Wed fails to pay the mortgage principal and interest to the plaintiff. The defendant is a buyer from the auction of the mortgaged property in a civil case number 11353/2534 red on Wed Aug creditors under the court's ruling to the mortgaged property to repay the money even if the defendant is a buyer for Sat. mortgaged property. But it is not a party defendant in a civil case No. 9861/2544, the plaintiff sued the Red Bank, May, and the defendant has the right to redeem mortgaged under Section 736 on the defendant and the plaintiff is not paying off your mortgage notice. the mortgage to the defendant under section 735, but the defendant ignored the plaintiff's right to dispute the defendant after the plaintiff's lawsuit. Red Bank, Civil No. 9861/2544 of the Court of First Instance. The case that the plaintiff sued the defendant in this case is different with the Red Bank, civil case No. 9861/2544 of the Court. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit can not be sued again.
Supreme Court in 2869/2549.
First, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit and a squadron Wed May and forced to pay the mortgage on the Court Case number 16255/2536 case is red, then the defendant is a buyer of assets from the auction, the lender in case of red 5957/2537. Judgement of May, according to the plaintiff as a public auction holder shall have the right to enforce the mortgage against the property. But the defendant is liable to the plaintiff as a mortgage but do not. As of the defendant as assignee of the mortgage assets that have the rights and duties. Provided for in the Civil and Commercial Code 12, Chapter 4 that the plaintiff will not be payable based on the verdict in the District Court Case No. 16255/2536 red. Such property shall follow immediately. Defendants are not parties to the case. The issue of the case is different as well. If so, the search for the right to be treated as the same party dismantled. Claim against each other on issues that were ruled by the same reason, do not. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit is filed is not unique to the District Court Case No. 16255/2536 red. P.wi.p. not prohibited by Section 148.
Supreme Court to 809/2545.
The plaintiff will sue the three defendants as a statutory heir of Thor Thor is the repayment and redemption of land as collateral for mortgage loans after the death of T. to terminate the lawsuit over a year, which makes the grade Section 1754 shall be the plaintiff mortgagee the right to compel the defendant to pay the three plaintiffs. Removed from the property mortgaged under Section 193/27.
It did not appear. The plaintiff has made a Power of Attorney. Plaintiff's lawyer told the mortgage. But when he told the plaintiff was forced to accept mortgages on behalf of the plaintiff and the plaintiff took. Plaintiff's lawyer had told the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and the plaintiff would be considered. Ratified in accordance with Section 823 and shall be deemed to have notice of the defendant and third mortgages.
T. owe the plaintiff, and died down. The three defendants, which is a statutory heir of Thor would get the rights, duties and obligations to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to claim payment out of the three defendants as heirs by No more than fair as far as the estate received under Section 1601 of the three defendants will inherit the estate of Tor and Tor or not. It must be said in court.
Supreme Court in 8843/2544.
The second defendant is the owner of the land and the land and building for As security for loans that had the two money the plaintiff by the defendant, a co-defendants, the second loan the plaintiff but the defendant is a non-land to the plaintiff, the notice of the mortgage before the Court, it is that the plaintiff will notice. force Mortgage to the defendant, 2, and the plaintiff had notice of the mortgage to the defendant to two by the then Civil and Commercial Code, Section 728 the plaintiff was not forced to declare the mortgage to the defendant as a prior, so the fact that one is not a book. notice the mortgage of the plaintiff would have no effect at all.
Article 6, paragraph two loan agreements provide that in case the borrower fails to constitute the terms. The borrower would be deemed in default of the debt shall be treated. All liabilities under this agreement will be due immediately, so that when a defendant, as borrowers defaulted on the terms then. The plaintiff sued the defendant would have been without a prior notice.
Supreme Court in 2702/2544.
Notice shall specify the amount of mortgage by the plaintiff, the defendant must pay to differ. The defendant has the right to dispute the amount. The notice shall not cause the mortgage does not like.
Defendant's property is mortgaged. Guarantee the debt of others. That they terminate the debt. And accused of taking advantage of age is required by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 745 which states that The mortgagee to require mortgage loan insurance, even when they expire at the time. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage can not exceed five years. The plaintiff is entitled to interest payable before the case back to a period of 5 years.
Supreme Court in 5245/2543.
The defendant owed the plaintiff under the three loan debt and an overdraft to the plaintiff by the defendant to pay interest on the contract. It is the plaintiff's breach of contract. When the overdraft agreement and the agreement to allow the plaintiff to recover three. Notice to terminate the agreement before the contract expired. The plaintiff to the defendant the right to terminate the contract before the contract expired, so I need to. I honestly do not exercise. After all, if the plaintiff to the defendant to release the loan to be even more burdensome to the defendant. Repayment to the plaintiff may not be exact. And that the plaintiff give the defendant company, a subsidiary of HMS as a loan from the plaintiff. The debt repayment to the plaintiff to the defendant. And allow the defendant to recover money from plaintiff. To reduce the debt of the defendant. According to the defendant's testimony that the defendants are going to benefit them all. Looking for an exercise in bad faith.
The defendant has received notice of the mortgage, but demands, and the defendant to pay money to the plaintiff only partially. The plaintiff did not pay the entire amount demanded. It does not make a claim and notice of the mortgage to the end result. I can bring the defendant to pay the deductible to reduce existing debt. I think the interest on the debt that I owe to the filing date. The indictment is outstanding as the book does not meet the demand by the defendant to pay some of it does not cause the plaintiff to a written demand and notice of the new mortgage. The plaintiff shall have the power to sue.
Supreme Court in 3680/2543.
Under Section 728 Constitution of the mortgagee to enforce the rules in the mortgage. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable notice is given in the book, so when the plaintiff has demanded payment of mortgage debt and the intention to force the defendant to the plaintiff shall have the right to sue five of the five defendants to jointly pay the mortgage and then. The defendant has not paid a debt to the plaintiff. The payments to some. The plaintiff gave the defendant a chance. Shall be filed immediately. After the repayment schedule set forth in such books as you would to. All five defendants are. They will return to the plaintiff's claim that the action of the termination notice. Shall not be mortgaged.
Supreme Court in 1551/2543.
The petitioner, a mortgagee does not apply to the court before the public auction of property rights would cause the petitioner is not entitled as mortgagee, because of the court. Property under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 289 of the judgment debtor shall not affect the preferential rights of the mortgagee. Disputes over property which may be required to enforce the law, or when the property sold by mortgage, according to the wishes of the petitioner. And he is buying from auction to auction. Petitioner is entitled to receive payment before other creditors, including plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 2080/2543.
First, the plaintiff filed a notice to the defendant to pay the mortgage, and notice to the defendant and the plaintiff's subsequent revision to the debt she owed. The new debt is higher than that in which the plaintiff informed the defendant. And notice that the mortgage debt. The amount of debt in the book is not all that significant. The plaintiff is not required to notify the defendant notice of the mortgage debt and the debt. Increased in any way. The amount of such debt is debt owed to the plaintiff because the defendant. Held that the plaintiff has given notice to the defendant to pay the debts and mortgages before. Prosecution by the next.
Supreme Court in 7141/2542.
The loan agreement have agreed to the interest payable not less than a year, compounded with the principal and interest on the amount compounded into it. Enforceable under Section 655 paragraph one and is not in force and shall not bear interest during the overlapping interest in default under Section 224, paragraph two, despite the maturity of debts and receivables. The plaintiff is entitled to charge default interest. How to do it.
The plaintiff sent the notice of claim and the mortgage. The defendant to pay the debt and redeem the mortgage, the defendant did not. The notice to the defendant's newspaper. Notice to the mortgagee to pay the debt within a reasonable time, then Section 728.
Supreme Court in 5553/2542.
In the case of a mortgagee creditor intends to sue the mortgage. Enforcement creditor shall notify in writing to the mortgagor, the debtor must be given reasonable time to allow the mortgagor to pay the mortgage debt. Notice is a condition that the mortgagee must be done to correct it. To sue the mortgage. Such notice of intent must be the intention. The law is on mortgages, the fact that I had died before the plaintiff Sat mortgagor a written notice to the other, despite the receipt of such notice is deemed not to be forced to mortgage the mortgage law passed away on Sat. Heritage as well as rights, duties and responsibilities shall devolve upon the heir of the Sun under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1599.1600 is the transfer of property that is mortgaged. If the plaintiff wishes to enforce a mortgage have a letter of notice to the transferee before 1 month prior to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 735, if it does not appear that any property which is the assignee of the mortgage, the mortgage, but the MP or his successor trustee. The plaintiff is a letter or written notice at least a month to which such person is the transferee of the mortgaged property. To sue the mortgage. When the plaintiff did not notice the mortgage of the defendants 3 and 4, which is a descendant of the mortgages before filing. The plaintiff sued the defendants 3 and 4, is considered not as a legal notice to the mortgagee. The plaintiff has no power to sue the mortgage.
Supreme Court to 938/2542.
Under contract to the land as security for a letter stating that the written notice and any documents of the mortgagee. If sent to a location identified as a mortgage. Domicile of the mortgage agreement. Or other place where the mortgagor a written notice of the change. The mortgagee will be delivered in person or by mail. Whether registered or not. And whether or not the mortgagor consents to it. Among such books or documents delivered to the mortgagee, so that by the plaintiff to send written notice to the defendant at the address at the residence. The defendant stated in a mortgage agreement. Therefore comply with the conditions agreed upon. In addition, plaintiff also sent a notice of the mortgage to the defendant's home. Which is the domicile of the defendant as well. Sending notice of the mortgage to the defendant. Both of them. Officially received and sent by registered mail to the location of both, as shall be deemed that the defendant and the plaintiff's written notice to the mortgagee and that the plaintiff has given notice to the defendant to pay the debt within A reasonable time before the plaintiff to sue the mortgage like it. The plaintiff shall have the power to enforce the mortgage against the Civil and Commercial Section 728 was due to the plaintiff by the defendant to pay. The defendant defaulted on the loan contract dispute, then the plaintiff has a book collection. And notice to the defendant to pay the mortgage within a reasonable period of time specified. The plaintiff terminated the contract of loan repayment to the defendant by demanding money. I told the mortgage. The bond that the plaintiff has the right to change interest rates to rise. Under the terms of the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant have a due date. And it appears that on the announcement of the plaintiff's interest rates and discounts. Loans that the plaintiff is entitled to a higher interest rate. According to the Bank of Thailand The plaintiff is entitled to raise interest rates to rise to 19 percent per year, the claimant may be referred to the announcement of the plaintiff's interest rate and discount loans. Credits in the case where the plaintiff claims, but from changes in interest rates. Had soared to 25 percent per year, because the condition that the plaintiff's right to raise interest rates as agreed in The end result is going to recover first.
Supreme Court in 4204/2541.
The contract specifies that land. Mortgage contract for a period of 5 years, but agreement about paying the mortgage. That interest. The mortgage interest on a monthly basis, it agreed to submit to the defendant, who was forced to mortgage the mortgage before the completion of 5 years the defendant shall have the duty to comply with the conditions set forth in the mortgage contract is a must. The plaintiff to pay the interest on a monthly basis. When it appears that Defendants do not pay interest to the plaintiff. The defendant is in default. All payments under the mortgage, the plaintiff shall have the power to demand notice. And sue the mortgage. Without waiting for the maturity period of 5 years before the Court of Appeals upholds the judge to enforce the mortgage on the land title deed No. 3382 to be inaccurate. The land of the defendant. The plaintiff is a mortgage with the Title deed of the 3386 Supreme Court should resolve. Waste properly.
Supreme Court in 7155/2541.
The plaintiff had to borrow money. The defendant's land was mortgaged as security. The unpaid principal and interest of the defendant until the plaintiff filed a notice of the mortgage by a fraction of 7 years from now. When the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 745 mortgagee can enforce the mortgage without the debt guarantee will terminate the go, whether or not it shall be the interest owed on the mortgage for more than five years is not forced to mortgage debt. The only type of interest is unpaid for more than five years that Liability insurance will expire or not. The only debt we have the right to terminate the plaintiff's claim is not known. In the interest of the defendant owed the plaintiff no more than five years, only the defendant's mortgage of land as collateral for a debt in 2530 amounted to 100,000, the land had cost more than one hundred thousand in the period. receive Mortgaged land prices generally increased several fold, even as land prices will go. What the economy. However, it decreases only slightly even when the prosecution land. Of the defendant, it must also be many times higher than the mortgage, there are problems in the mortgaged property for the amount of flooding. The unpaid. Is hearing evidence in court. Although the defendant did not serve as proof of But all serve as proof of the plaintiff or The fact that the expressions and the known indicator of the general. Courts have ruled accordingly. When listening to the fact that the price of the mortgaged property would flood the amount owed the plaintiff sued the mortgaged property is owned by the plaintiff did not fall.
Supreme Court to 92/2541.
The Supreme Court on the issue of law that Court of Appeals ruled that the plaintiff has to prove that the mortgaged property is not available. Higher debt tolerance conditions. Which defines the obligations of the parties has the burden of proof is clear that the mortgagor must Shown to the satisfaction of the court.So, whether either party has the burden of proof. The results of the case would not change the law that the plaintiff is not material to the case. It should have been diagnosed.
Supreme Court in 3551/2541.
Sat managing director of the plaintiff. And has the power to appoint an employee of the bank, the plaintiff in any action as specified in the regulations of the plaintiff bank. The power to Vice President, I authorized to act on such a liability claim against all the civil and defense instead. And authorized the agent to act on it, and I have power of attorney or the district, and. Prosecute for all three defendants. When the plaintiff's attorney is going to continue uninterrupted. Indictment and prosecution of the plaintiff and the like.
Complaint, plaintiffs described on the false fact that the defendant is an open current account and the overdraft with the plaintiff's current account by the defendant to a mortgaged property as security for debts and accused 2 and 3, the contract guarantees the defendant. 1 The plaintiffs also include details about the interest rate and the interest. In the other, and identify outstanding misses at December 31, 2534 amounting to 128,931,527.86 U.S. interest to sue is 12,169,017.73 Baht debt 141,100,555.59 Baht to the defendant and three co-payment of such debt, plus interest from the next. from Date filed until payment is made, the details that reflect the condition of the plaintiff's request, the court relied primarily on the claims alleged by the obvious. The information or documents relating to a debt account is false. Fact that both the likelihood that it will serve as proof that the evidence in its consideration. Although plaintiff's complaint did not specify any such documents. Would make the sued unclear not.
The plaintiff's attorney to do so. I told the mortgage or not. The notice required by Section 728 mortgage shall be made in writing only. Is not defined, but somehow when I was told the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and one defendant received notice of it. But do not pay the mortgage and the plaintiff sued. Held that the plaintiff had ratified the notice required by Section 823 mortgage, the mortgagee shall notify the plaintiff as a favorite. Not void.
The three defendants admitted that the guarantee agreement signed by all the guarantees in the contract. And its terms, it is clear that the defendant is a debtor of the defendant, 2 and 3 is the guarantor. It is shown that the three defendants as the explicit guarantee that the private The three defendants claimed that it signed on behalf of the defendant, a corporation which is not. The defendants, three were not authorized to bind the defendant, a part of the notice to call the defendant to three when the plaintiff notice of claim accused 1 and accused of a default, then the plaintiff will have claims to the defendant. 3, which guarantees payment of the debt immediately and without notice to the defendant under Section 686 of the three will receive a notice of claim or not. The third defendant is released from liability.
Contractual guarantees defendants 2 and 3, the defendant agreed to guarantee the debt of U.S. $ 63.2 million to 1 in the amount of debt which is secured overdraft. And the amount of debt that a defendant may be increased or reduced by the introduction of money into and withdraw from the account. Any time a defendant owes the full amount guaranteed by the guarantors are jointly liable to the full amount of support. Insurance, with interest from the date of withdrawal is the amount of guarantee as early, but if I had the first of which is due to the cash payment deductive account until the debt is lower than the amount of guarantee the guarantor shall not be liable. debt, the defendant shall be paid an amount equal to the rest until the full disbursement of new loan guarantees, the guarantor will be liable for the full amount plus interest is guaranteed. Guarantor, the guarantor will be liable for the full amount plus interest from the date of any Must consider the defendant owed the plaintiff a full amount of guarantees. When the last defendant in a debt the plaintiff the full amount of the guarantee contract is dated November 1, 2527 the defendant, 2 and 3, we have to pay interest to the plaintiff from the date of November 1, 2527 onwards, however, the loan disbursement. exceed the account between the plaintiff and the defendant an end on April 2, 2528 the defendant, 2 and 3, we have interest to the plaintiff from the date of November 1, 2527 onwards till April 2, 2528, the end of the contract only. After that, no compounding of interest until payment is made to the plaintiff. Shall bear interest at the same rate as the first defendant and the need to deposit at the time the card is listed in the current account. On the outstanding account balance down to 2 and 3, the defendant's liability to a defendant as well.
Supreme Court in 7630/2540.
The notice shall be mortgaged. That the plaintiff filed a lecture. Plaintiff's attorney was authorized to issue a written notice to the defendant to five mortgage payments and redemption of particular plaintiff a copy of Power of Attorney and a copy of the notice. To repay the loan. Overdraft loan debt. Debt guarantees. And to redeem the mortgage by the end of the indictment. It is part of the indictment. In addition, the complaint, the plaintiff's request to be clearly stated. The five defendants were able to fight the lawsuit was not lost to the defense. The plaintiff sued, so do not be vague
President of the plaintiff Bank authorized signature. Hand, acting on behalf of a plaintiff. Without the seal of the plaintiff, the Bank President has the power of attorney for the plaintiff. I pursue this instead. As well as giving notice to the defendant by the five settlements. The plaintiff's attorney has an attorney general that I can use in the prosecution of any person, when a dispute arises between the person with the plaintiff about the plaintiff's business as it has been assigned. The plaintiff need not specify them. It has the power to sue any defendant specifically the plaintiff's attorney I have sued the defendants, five of these cases.
Defendant to pay a debt to the plaintiff, by the way broken down into loan account. The plaintiff's evidence, a receipt will be issued to the defendant at a time and a notification that a deductive account the defendant's agreement, when it was deducted from the loan account to account by this method. The said defendant did not know that an argument against. This case held that a defendant implicitly consented to such action by a defendant is liable in the amount of the contract, the plaintiff's account to the deductive account.
The loan overdraft is not the time to end it, the plaintiff has notice of claim to the defendant that a borrower's payment within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice of the defendant a receipt to each I do not pay the debt. It is an event of default. As a result, the current contract ends on the due date. Notice. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest until then.
Section 728 is not provided for how much time is reasonable. Must be considered to be the case.
Notice to the defendant by the plaintiff to enforce the mortgage term to repay the debt within 30 days, although the plaintiff claims the defendant's claim. A payment of up to U.S. $ 9,799,838.75, which is time enough in which to earn money for a defendant to pay plaintiff. Period is a reasonable time. So like I told the mortgage.
Supreme Court in 5902/2540.
The notice required under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 728 mortgage shall be made in writing only. Not defined as a set. District Court authorized the notice of the mortgage to the defendant. I have not authorized by a written notice to the mortgagee on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was subsequently appointed to the District Attorney to prosecute the defendant's mortgage. The plaintiff has testified that the District Attorney to enforce a mortgage given to the defendant. The plaintiff had been ratified by notice to the defendant know the mortgage. Notice the mortgage of the plaintiff law is void.
Supreme Court in 5640/2540.
The Sun is a land dispute over the lessor of the mortgage and bank charges. The mortgage on the land dispute at public auction to pay debt service. For use as a. Sun wants to sell rice. The transfer of a mortgage loan in the amount of outstanding mortgage debt is not. But the story was. Sat or Sun was forced to land or property to be seized for public auction to pay. Mortgage repayments to creditors, the mortgagee under the authority of the laws regarding debt. Mortgages and the mortgage is provided as a special way. Trading in the auction of the court in such cases. It's not that the lessor in the sale of rice. Agricultural Land Act 2524, Section 53, first paragraph.
She has worked with all three. F. Land dispute from the auction of real Enter the name of the petitioner in the three official land is required. According to a report ordered by a court order stating that a public auction. F. One is buying it. It may be that the three who sings with a land dispute. F. From the beginning anyway. The petitioner and three. May. To the official registration of the land, who sings these three phones. With the property. F. Truthfully. It has a land dispute between them. F. Sung with all three. So she joined the three as a matter of buying land. Sat landlords who rent from the auction of the court. Land disputes can not be refunded to those who oppose the lease. Agricultural Land Act 2524 Section 54.
Supreme Court in 4143/2535.
I made a compromise with the defendant that the defendant refused to transfer the disputed land to the petitioner if the breach of contract claim. Effective immediately and shall be sentenced according to his intention to transfer the defendant when the court ruling. By then it is strictly prohibited. Petitioner shall be entitled to the verdict. To force registration of rights under Section 1300 of the Civil and Commercial Code, the petitioner has the right to request to suspend enforcement of the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the mortgage. The court sentenced the defendant.
Section 729 in addition to solutions like those provided in the previous section. Mortgagee also like to call the Sealant Evaluation mortgaged property subject to the conditions. This can be the following.
(1) the debtor has not been sent interest rates for up to five years.
(2) the mortgage does not show the court is satisfied that the price of the property outstanding, and the amount of flooding.
(3) no other mortgages. Or other preferential rights registered over the same property itself.
Section 730 on any one single property to the mortgagee a mortgage together. He shall order the mortgagee by date and time of registration. And before the mortgagee shall be a debt prior to the mortgagee.
Section 731 of the mortgagee who will enforce the rights of their people before the damage to the mortgagee. You probably do not know what.
Section 732 auction of the mortgaged property which is the net amount of money and how much you use them. Mortgagee in order. And if there is money remaining. Then delivered to the mortgagor.
Section 733 if the mortgaged property and such property is approximately Hlud less than the amount outstanding. Pay is good. If the property is sold off the mortgage debt. The net amount is less than the amount due upon it. How much due to the lack of funds shall not be liable for the money.
Section 734 if the mortgage assets to guarantee debt, but a lot of things only and does not specify the order that you remember that the mortgagee to enforce their rights to the property that either all or only some things. But you shall not do so many things to the property than it needed to repay the debt. The rights of their own.
You shall be distributed according to a specified amount of mortgage assets and other such things.
However, if the mortgagee to enforce their rights to the property, but only one thing soon becomes the mortgagee to repay a portion of its assets, all of that. In that case, the mortgagee will be deemed to be the next person in order to inherit. The rights of the mortgagee and the mortgagor shall be replaced before, but just. The amount which the mortgagee who will receive from the other assets of such provisions in the preceding paragraph.
Section 735 on the mortgage, the mortgagee shall not apply to the assignee of the mortgage assets. You must mail notice to the transferee in advance, one month before that. The mortgage.
Supreme Court in 6829/2551.
The first defendant and the plaintiff entered into a loan agreement, mortgage, land and building as security for such debt by the end of the mortgage agreement that If the plaintiff the mortgage money to pay the defendant a permit shall pay the deficiency until the defendant 2 is the wife by the law of the defendant that a consent to the defendant that a contract to recover the funds. The loans are made aware that the defendant has caused an increase in debt and have ratified it. Debt it owes the husband and wife as joint debtors under Section 1490 (4) The defendant's second wife to a husband with the defendant to the plaintiff liable to pay such debts as well.
Section 728 states just that. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable as defined in the notice. Not provided that notification shall be made in writing by providing the mortgage. The lawyer told the mortgage so they do not need to be made under section 798 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 3802/2551.
Mortgage debt you apply for a mortgage loan from the auction of the mortgaged property to be taken. The proceeds from the loan before its creditors under Section 289 Civil Procedure Code without prior notice to the mortgagee. The lawsuit is not directly applicable to such mortgage loan prior to the Section 728.
Supreme Court in 2574/2551.
The court initially sentenced the four defendants together with interest payments to the plaintiff. If you do not pay the mortgage, the land of the defendant at a public auction. If money is not enough to seize the assets of the defendant, the defendant reached a settlement 3 and 4, must be jointly liable for all debts must be paid to the plaintiff. When the plaintiff shall pay the mortgaged property from the defendant an amount insufficient to pay the verdict. Plaintiffs would be forced to repay some of the assets of the defendants 3 and 4, as Section 214.
Supreme Court in 1535/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable to pay a debt as the mortgage loan and overdraft. And asked the defendant to 2 to 7, as assignee of the property by the mortgage liability attached to the mortgagee is entitled to. Receive payment from the mortgage asset, mortgage by the transferee of the mortgaged property in accordance with Section 735 of the case and the obligations which can not be separated from each other by Civil Procedure Code Section 59. (1) the defendant's two prescription claims for more than five years of unpaid interest to fight. As a result of a defendant as well.
Section 745 stipulates that "the mortgagee to the mortgagor. Even when the insurance shall terminate the debt already. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage, not exceeding five years "means. Mortgagee can not enforce a mortgage debt would terminate the insurance or not, but shall not enforce against the interest owed on the mortgage debt of more than five years, so even the president does not expire. Plaintiff would be entitled to claim interest from the first defendant owed no more than five years.
Supreme Court in 1580/2551.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Accused the plaintiff of the 4.2 million loans by the land and the building was mortgaged to the plaintiff as collateral for a loan. The plaintiff and the defendant has made a loan agreement to pay U.S. $ 3.5 million mortgage at an amount of force the defendant to repay the loan plus interest under the mortgage and the mortgage. By request, the lawsuit said. If the defendant does not pay the mortgage of land and buildings at the public auction. Money to pay the plaintiff, the plaintiff sued the mortgage would be the case. The only mortgage of property. Does not apply to debt claims of the ordinary. The land is not labeled as such. If the plaintiff shall pay the auction of the mortgaged property are insufficient to pay debt service. The plaintiff was forced to remove from the other assets of the defendant as well. The court sentenced the defendant to pay the debt and the mortgage. Plaintiff shall pay the amount of their mortgage debt is not enough, according to court the plaintiff had no legal right to remove it from the other assets of the defendant under Section 733.
Supreme Court in 1975/2551.
Civil Procedure Code Section 289 does not limit the rights of the mortgagee that the mortgage must be filed on or before that. Judgement creditors must follow to obtain a mortgage loan is. When a defendant fails to repay the loan contract and mortgage contract to the petitioner, the mortgagee. Shall apply to the court under Section 289 has been paying the mortgage.
Notice required by Section 728 mortgage to the mortgagee for the prosecution to the court to allow judges to order the seizure. Mortgaged property. But in the case of applying for a mortgage loan before the Civil Procedure Code Section 289 is not a lawsuit to force the mortgage will sequester them. She also apply for a mortgage loan without a letter of notice to the defendant before a debtor.
Supreme Court in 1580/2551.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Accused the plaintiff of the 4.2 million loans by the land and the building was mortgaged to the plaintiff as collateral for a loan. The plaintiff and the defendant has made a loan agreement to pay U.S. $ 3.5 million mortgage at an amount of force the defendant to repay the loan plus interest under the mortgage and the mortgage. By request, the lawsuit said. If the defendant does not pay the mortgage of land and buildings at the public auction. Money to pay the plaintiff, the plaintiff sued the mortgage would be the case. The only mortgage of property. Does not apply to debt claims of the ordinary. The land is not labeled as such. If the plaintiff shall pay the auction of the mortgaged property are insufficient to pay debt service. The plaintiff was forced to remove from the other assets of the defendant as well. The court sentenced the defendant to pay the debt and the mortgage. Plaintiff shall pay the amount of their mortgage debt is not enough, according to court the plaintiff had no legal right to remove it from the other assets of the defendant under Section 733.
Supreme Court in 8260/2550.
The defendant owed the plaintiff a debt owed the defendant money to pay to the plaintiff, without any conditions, because the debt will be successful as any. Debtor's obligations to its creditors, it is directly under the first paragraph of Section 208 on the defendant by the plaintiff's settlement offer to transfer the mortgaged property in lieu of cash payment. It's not a legitimate obligations. Plaintiffs have no reason to reject a settlement that the plaintiff did not constitute a default under Section 207.
Section 733 of the Civil and Commercial Code provisions, presumably the intent of the parties in particular. It is not about morality as it is popular among the general public or the traditions of the society is no provision of law relating to public order or good morals of the plaintiff may agree with the defendant, otherwise a special addition to the Section 733 law. them.
Supreme Court to 932/2550.
Mortgage insurance is a contract a debt to assets retained by the president and mortgage debt. The device of the debt. This may be split into different parts separately from each other. Creditors, therefore, prefer to use the debt-claim for the repayment of capital is the property of the debtor under Section 213 or to enforce preferred mortgage is a forced liquidation of assets to any mortgage under section 728. The law does not apply in cases where a mortgage already. A creditor will sue to force the debtor to the debt capital under Section 214 is not the only law that If the plaintiff is entitled to enforce the rights of the plaintiff's mortgage would fall under the provisions of Section 733 and Section 733 does not apply if the plaintiff is entitled to sue the mortgage, but the only way. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the loan under the loan agreement. When the defendant fails to pay the debt to the plaintiff by the verdict. The plaintiff shall be entitled to the assets of the defendant in court, including the mortgaged property. The plaintiff is not entitled to court, but only the land mortgaged as security. Loans only.
Supreme Court to 460/2550.
Plaintiffs filed this case more than one year from the date the plaintiff knew or should have known about the death of the section. Ehgamrdk the debt under the loan, which terminate the debt. This is because the loan is registered with the land as security for a debt under the loan, which will terminate the debt. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce payment of the mortgaged property under the third paragraph of Section 1754 and Section 193/27, but the only property that is mortgaged. May be forced to find other assets of the channel. Ehgamrdk can not. The land contract is an agreement to end the contract of insurance and a mortgage. Insurance will be labeled. By the time the mortgage, the mortgaged property is sold for less than the net amount. The amount owed on the equipment. How much money do not have a mortgage and the debtor shall be responsible for the lack of money. That the amount given to the mortgagee.
The plaintiff is a commercial bank. The maximum rate of interest from customers. Bank of Thailand and the Commercial Banking Act, Section 14, it announced that it is against the law for the court to recognize them. The fact that the parties have a duty attest The Court has ordered that documents pertaining to plaintiff's interest. The documents from the defendant is forbidden to listen to as Section 90, the plaintiff did not appeal Civil Procedure Code such order of the Court of First Instance held that it is possible. Attest that the plaintiff has no evidence. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest rates as provided by law. The interest is void. The plaintiff shall be entitled to charge interest at a rate of 7.5 percent per year during the default under Section 224.
Supreme Court in 6116 - 6117/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 734, paragraph two, as is the case with many mortgage assets to guarantee debt, one by one. Set the order. When the mortgagee the right to property shall be distributed to all at once. The burden of mortgage debt to the amount specified for that particular property. But Barker is not mortgagee to exercise such rights. When the plaintiff was only an ordinary creditor is entitled to receive payment on the debt. Mortgage to the petitioner still has money left from the auction only. The plaintiff has no right under any such claim.
Supreme Court in 3535/2550.
Land contract between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 of the Revenue Department as security for repayment of outstanding tax debt there is no agreement that the first defendant. If the property is sold the mortgage to the amount of net debt to less than Amount owed each other. How much money is still a lack of a defendant liable for the money. The exemption provisions of Section 733 may be in the provisions of this Section is that if the mortgage loan amount is not enough that a defendant is not liable in respect of the Section 733 does not have to. limit the use of force only if the debtor's assets as a mortgage.
Supreme Court in 1657/2550.
Section 728 stipulates that "when the mortgage is. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor before ... "is not provided. Notice shall be in writing mortgages. Therefore, the plaintiff's attorney to the. Written notice of the mortgage, the defendant does not fall within the provisions of Section 798 paragraph one, given the agent must be in writing on that. A notice of the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant received the letter. I did not notice. Payment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's lawsuit. The plaintiff accepts that the notice provisions of the new mortgage. The notice of the plaintiff. Held that the plaintiff, which it ratified in accordance with Section 823 shall constitute notice to the plaintiff by the then mortgage.
Supreme Court to 932/2550.
Mortgage insurance is a contract a debt to assets retained by the president and mortgage debt. The device of the debt. This may be split into different parts separately from each other. Creditors, therefore, prefer to use the debt-claim for the repayment of capital is the property of the debtor under Section 213 or to enforce preferred mortgage is a forced liquidation of assets to any mortgage under section 728. The law does not apply in cases where a mortgage already. A creditor will sue to force the debtor to the debt capital under Section 214 is not the only law that If the plaintiff is entitled to enforce the rights of the plaintiff's mortgage would fall under the provisions of Section 733 and Section 733 does not apply if the plaintiff is entitled to sue the mortgage, but the only way. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the loan under the loan agreement. When the defendant fails to pay the debt to the plaintiff by the verdict. The plaintiff shall be entitled to the assets of the defendant in court, including the mortgaged property. The plaintiff is not entitled to court, but only the land mortgaged as security. Loans only.
Supreme Court to 462/2550.
Section 728 provided just that. When the mortgage. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor before that. To pay the debt within a reasonable time only. Plaintiffs do not have a mortgage on the property with notice. When the defendant is both the debtor and the mortgaged property which they know already registered. Mortgage as security for repayment of the loan, the plaintiff is. No. 54/225 for my studio apartment, No. 0225, the notice of the mortgaged property is a condominium unit at 0225 it was clear that a printing error, which is a little flat. When the plaintiff has notice to the defendant to redeem the mortgage within 30 days from the date of receipt of such books. It held that the mortgagee has given a letter to the debtor that the debt within Reasonable time under the provisions of such laws. Notice the mortgage of the plaintiff was unlawful.
Agreement at the end of the mortgage 5. States that do not handle it ... if the mortgage insurance and government mortgage insurance and I have agreed to pay a mortgage insurance premium paid to the mortgagee to pay the full net. within 1 month from the date of the mortgagee notice ... Under the agreement shows that the plaintiff has the right to require the defendant to pay premiums. Insurance only when it advances to pay the premium only. There is no right to require the defendant to pay the premium in the future that are not yet due.
Supreme Court in 5484/2549.
To be sued again by Civil Procedure Code Section 148 must be the case that the court has sentenced a final order by any of the issues. Any reason then. The same pair was indicted in the demolition issue. Based on the same grounds that it did not. Red Bank, 9861/2544, but for a number of civil court cases, the plaintiff sued to enforce loan repayment, plus interest and forced Sun to Wed fails to pay the mortgage principal and interest to the plaintiff. The defendant is a buyer from the auction of the mortgaged property in a civil case number 11353/2534 red on Wed Aug creditors under the court's ruling to the mortgaged property to repay the money even if the defendant is a buyer for Sat. mortgaged property. But it is not a party defendant in a civil case No. 9861/2544, the plaintiff sued the Red Bank, May, and the defendant has the right to redeem mortgaged under Section 736 on the defendant and the plaintiff is not paying off your mortgage notice. the mortgage to the defendant under section 735, but the defendant ignored the plaintiff's right to dispute the defendant after the plaintiff's lawsuit. Red Bank, Civil No. 9861/2544 of the Court of First Instance. The case that the plaintiff sued the defendant in this case is different with the Red Bank, civil case No. 9861/2544 of the Court. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit can not be sued again.
Supreme Court in 2869/2549.
First, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit and a squadron Wed May and forced to pay the mortgage on the Court Case number 16255/2536 case is red, then the defendant is a buyer of assets from the auction, the lender in case of red 5957/2537. Judgement of May, according to the plaintiff as a public auction holder shall have the right to enforce the mortgage against the property. But the defendant is liable to the plaintiff as a mortgage but do not. As of the defendant as assignee of the mortgage assets that have the rights and duties. Provided for in the Civil and Commercial Code 12, Chapter 4 that the plaintiff will not be payable based on the verdict in the District Court Case No. 16255/2536 red. Such property shall follow immediately. Defendants are not parties to the case. The issue of the case is different as well. If so, the search for the right to be treated as the same party dismantled. Claim against each other on issues that were ruled by the same reason, do not. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit is filed is not unique to the District Court Case No. 16255/2536 red. P.wi.p. not prohibited by Section 148.
Supreme Court to 809/2545.
The plaintiff will sue the three defendants as a statutory heir of Thor Thor is the repayment and redemption of land as collateral for mortgage loans after the death of T. to terminate the lawsuit over a year, which makes the grade Section 1754 shall be the plaintiff mortgagee the right to compel the defendant to pay the three plaintiffs. Removed from the property mortgaged under Section 193/27.
It did not appear. The plaintiff has made a Power of Attorney. Plaintiff's lawyer told the mortgage. But when he told the plaintiff was forced to accept mortgages on behalf of the plaintiff and the plaintiff took. Plaintiff's lawyer had told the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and the plaintiff would be considered. Ratified in accordance with Section 823 and shall be deemed to have notice of the defendant and third mortgages.
T. owe the plaintiff, and died down. The three defendants, which is a statutory heir of Thor would get the rights, duties and obligations to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to claim payment out of the three defendants as heirs by No more than fair as far as the estate received under Section 1601 of the three defendants will inherit the estate of Tor and Tor or not. It must be said in court.
Supreme Court in 8843/2544.
The second defendant is the owner of the land and the land and building for As security for loans that had the two money the plaintiff by the defendant, a co-defendants, the second loan the plaintiff but the defendant is a non-land to the plaintiff, the notice of the mortgage before the Court, it is that the plaintiff will notice. force Mortgage to the defendant, 2, and the plaintiff had notice of the mortgage to the defendant to two by the then Civil and Commercial Code, Section 728 the plaintiff was not forced to declare the mortgage to the defendant as a prior, so the fact that one is not a book. notice the mortgage of the plaintiff would have no effect at all.
Article 6, paragraph two loan agreements provide that in case the borrower fails to constitute the terms. The borrower would be deemed in default of the debt shall be treated. All liabilities under this agreement will be due immediately, so that when a defendant, as borrowers defaulted on the terms then. The plaintiff sued the defendant would have been without a prior notice.
Supreme Court in 2702/2544.
Notice shall specify the amount of mortgage by the plaintiff, the defendant must pay to differ. The defendant has the right to dispute the amount. The notice shall not cause the mortgage does not like.
Defendant's property is mortgaged. Guarantee the debt of others. That they terminate the debt. And accused of taking advantage of age is required by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 745 which states that The mortgagee to require mortgage loan insurance, even when they expire at the time. This will force the interest owed on the mortgage can not exceed five years. The plaintiff is entitled to interest payable before the case back to a period of 5 years.
Supreme Court in 5245/2543.
The defendant owed the plaintiff under the three loan debt and an overdraft to the plaintiff by the defendant to pay interest on the contract. It is the plaintiff's breach of contract. When the overdraft agreement and the agreement to allow the plaintiff to recover three. Notice to terminate the agreement before the contract expired. The plaintiff to the defendant the right to terminate the contract before the contract expired, so I need to. I honestly do not exercise. After all, if the plaintiff to the defendant to release the loan to be even more burdensome to the defendant. Repayment to the plaintiff may not be exact. And that the plaintiff give the defendant company, a subsidiary of HMS as a loan from the plaintiff. The debt repayment to the plaintiff to the defendant. And allow the defendant to recover money from plaintiff. To reduce the debt of the defendant. According to the defendant's testimony that the defendants are going to benefit them all. Looking for an exercise in bad faith.
The defendant has received notice of the mortgage, but demands, and the defendant to pay money to the plaintiff only partially. The plaintiff did not pay the entire amount demanded. It does not make a claim and notice of the mortgage to the end result. I can bring the defendant to pay the deductible to reduce existing debt. I think the interest on the debt that I owe to the filing date. The indictment is outstanding as the book does not meet the demand by the defendant to pay some of it does not cause the plaintiff to a written demand and notice of the new mortgage. The plaintiff shall have the power to sue.
Supreme Court in 3680/2543.
Under Section 728 Constitution of the mortgagee to enforce the rules in the mortgage. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable notice is given in the book, so when the plaintiff has demanded payment of mortgage debt and the intention to force the defendant to the plaintiff shall have the right to sue five of the five defendants to jointly pay the mortgage and then. The defendant has not paid a debt to the plaintiff. The payments to some. The plaintiff gave the defendant a chance. Shall be filed immediately. After the repayment schedule set forth in such books as you would to. All five defendants are. They will return to the plaintiff's claim that the action of the termination notice. Shall not be mortgaged.
Supreme Court in 1551/2543.
The petitioner, a mortgagee does not apply to the court before the public auction of property rights would cause the petitioner is not entitled as mortgagee, because of the court. Property under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 289 of the judgment debtor shall not affect the preferential rights of the mortgagee. Disputes over property which may be required to enforce the law, or when the property sold by mortgage, according to the wishes of the petitioner. And he is buying from auction to auction. Petitioner is entitled to receive payment before other creditors, including plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 2080/2543.
First, the plaintiff filed a notice to the defendant to pay the mortgage, and notice to the defendant and the plaintiff's subsequent revision to the debt she owed. The new debt is higher than that in which the plaintiff informed the defendant. And notice that the mortgage debt. The amount of debt in the book is not all that significant. The plaintiff is not required to notify the defendant notice of the mortgage debt and the debt. Increased in any way. The amount of such debt is debt owed to the plaintiff because the defendant. Held that the plaintiff has given notice to the defendant to pay the debts and mortgages before. Prosecution by the next.
Supreme Court in 7141/2542.
The loan agreement have agreed to the interest payable not less than a year, compounded with the principal and interest on the amount compounded into it. Enforceable under Section 655 paragraph one and is not in force and shall not bear interest during the overlapping interest in default under Section 224, paragraph two, despite the maturity of debts and receivables. The plaintiff is entitled to charge default interest. How to do it.
The plaintiff sent the notice of claim and the mortgage. The defendant to pay the debt and redeem the mortgage, the defendant did not. The notice to the defendant's newspaper. Notice to the mortgagee to pay the debt within a reasonable time, then Section 728.
Supreme Court in 5553/2542.
In the case of a mortgagee creditor intends to sue the mortgage. Enforcement creditor shall notify in writing to the mortgagor, the debtor must be given reasonable time to allow the mortgagor to pay the mortgage debt. Notice is a condition that the mortgagee must be done to correct it. To sue the mortgage. Such notice of intent must be the intention. The law is on mortgages, the fact that I had died before the plaintiff Sat mortgagor a written notice to the other, despite the receipt of such notice is deemed not to be forced to mortgage the mortgage law passed away on Sat. Heritage as well as rights, duties and responsibilities shall devolve upon the heir of the Sun under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1599.1600 is the transfer of property that is mortgaged. If the plaintiff wishes to enforce a mortgage have a letter of notice to the transferee before 1 month prior to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 735, if it does not appear that any property which is the assignee of the mortgage, the mortgage, but the MP or his successor trustee. The plaintiff is a letter or written notice at least a month to which such person is the transferee of the mortgaged property. To sue the mortgage. When the plaintiff did not notice the mortgage of the defendants 3 and 4, which is a descendant of the mortgages before filing. The plaintiff sued the defendants 3 and 4, is considered not as a legal notice to the mortgagee. The plaintiff has no power to sue the mortgage.
Supreme Court to 938/2542.
Under contract to the land as security for a letter stating that the written notice and any documents of the mortgagee. If sent to a location identified as a mortgage. Domicile of the mortgage agreement. Or other place where the mortgagor a written notice of the change. The mortgagee will be delivered in person or by mail. Whether registered or not. And whether or not the mortgagor consents to it. Among such books or documents delivered to the mortgagee, so that by the plaintiff to send written notice to the defendant at the address at the residence. The defendant stated in a mortgage agreement. Therefore comply with the conditions agreed upon. In addition, plaintiff also sent a notice of the mortgage to the defendant's home. Which is the domicile of the defendant as well. Sending notice of the mortgage to the defendant. Both of them. Officially received and sent by registered mail to the location of both, as shall be deemed that the defendant and the plaintiff's written notice to the mortgagee and that the plaintiff has given notice to the defendant to pay the debt within A reasonable time before the plaintiff to sue the mortgage like it. The plaintiff shall have the power to enforce the mortgage against the Civil and Commercial Section 728 was due to the plaintiff by the defendant to pay. The defendant defaulted on the loan contract dispute, then the plaintiff has a book collection. And notice to the defendant to pay the mortgage within a reasonable period of time specified. The plaintiff terminated the contract of loan repayment to the defendant by demanding money. I told the mortgage. The bond that the plaintiff has the right to change interest rates to rise. Under the terms of the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant have a due date. And it appears that on the announcement of the plaintiff's interest rates and discounts. Loans that the plaintiff is entitled to a higher interest rate. According to the Bank of Thailand The plaintiff is entitled to raise interest rates to rise to 19 percent per year, the claimant may be referred to the announcement of the plaintiff's interest rate and discount loans. Credits in the case where the plaintiff claims, but from changes in interest rates. Had soared to 25 percent per year, because the condition that the plaintiff's right to raise interest rates as agreed in The end result is going to recover first.
Supreme Court in 4204/2541.
The contract specifies that land. Mortgage contract for a period of 5 years, but agreement about paying the mortgage. That interest. The mortgage interest on a monthly basis, it agreed to submit to the defendant, who was forced to mortgage the mortgage before the completion of 5 years the defendant shall have the duty to comply with the conditions set forth in the mortgage contract is a must. The plaintiff to pay the interest on a monthly basis. When it appears that Defendants do not pay interest to the plaintiff. The defendant is in default. All payments under the mortgage, the plaintiff shall have the power to demand notice. And sue the mortgage. Without waiting for the maturity period of 5 years before the Court of Appeals upholds the judge to enforce the mortgage on the land title deed No. 3382 to be inaccurate. The land of the defendant. The plaintiff is a mortgage with the Title deed of the 3386 Supreme Court should resolve. Waste properly.
Supreme Court in 7155/2541.
The plaintiff had to borrow money. The defendant's land was mortgaged as security. The unpaid principal and interest of the defendant until the plaintiff filed a notice of the mortgage by a fraction of 7 years from now. When the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 745 mortgagee can enforce the mortgage without the debt guarantee will terminate the go, whether or not it shall be the interest owed on the mortgage for more than five years is not forced to mortgage debt. The only type of interest is unpaid for more than five years that Liability insurance will expire or not. The only debt we have the right to terminate the plaintiff's claim is not known. In the interest of the defendant owed the plaintiff no more than five years, only the defendant's mortgage of land as collateral for a debt in 2530 amounted to 100,000, the land had cost more than one hundred thousand in the period. receive Mortgaged land prices generally increased several fold, even as land prices will go. What the economy. However, it decreases only slightly even when the prosecution land. Of the defendant, it must also be many times higher than the mortgage, there are problems in the mortgaged property for the amount of flooding. The unpaid. Is hearing evidence in court. Although the defendant did not serve as proof of But all serve as proof of the plaintiff or The fact that the expressions and the known indicator of the general. Courts have ruled accordingly. When listening to the fact that the price of the mortgaged property would flood the amount owed the plaintiff sued the mortgaged property is owned by the plaintiff did not fall.
Supreme Court to 92/2541.
The Supreme Court on the issue of law that Court of Appeals ruled that the plaintiff has to prove that the mortgaged property is not available. Higher debt tolerance conditions. Which defines the obligations of the parties has the burden of proof is clear that the mortgagor must Shown to the satisfaction of the court.So, whether either party has the burden of proof. The results of the case would not change the law that the plaintiff is not material to the case. It should have been diagnosed.
Supreme Court in 3551/2541.
Sat managing director of the plaintiff. And has the power to appoint an employee of the bank, the plaintiff in any action as specified in the regulations of the plaintiff bank. The power to Vice President, I authorized to act on such a liability claim against all the civil and defense instead. And authorized the agent to act on it, and I have power of attorney or the district, and. Prosecute for all three defendants. When the plaintiff's attorney is going to continue uninterrupted. Indictment and prosecution of the plaintiff and the like.
Complaint, plaintiffs described on the false fact that the defendant is an open current account and the overdraft with the plaintiff's current account by the defendant to a mortgaged property as security for debts and accused 2 and 3, the contract guarantees the defendant. 1 The plaintiffs also include details about the interest rate and the interest. In the other, and identify outstanding misses at December 31, 2534 amounting to 128,931,527.86 U.S. interest to sue is 12,169,017.73 Baht debt 141,100,555.59 Baht to the defendant and three co-payment of such debt, plus interest from the next. from Date filed until payment is made, the details that reflect the condition of the plaintiff's request, the court relied primarily on the claims alleged by the obvious. The information or documents relating to a debt account is false. Fact that both the likelihood that it will serve as proof that the evidence in its consideration. Although plaintiff's complaint did not specify any such documents. Would make the sued unclear not.
The plaintiff's attorney to do so. I told the mortgage or not. The notice required by Section 728 mortgage shall be made in writing only. Is not defined, but somehow when I was told the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and one defendant received notice of it. But do not pay the mortgage and the plaintiff sued. Held that the plaintiff had ratified the notice required by Section 823 mortgage, the mortgagee shall notify the plaintiff as a favorite. Not void.
The three defendants admitted that the guarantee agreement signed by all the guarantees in the contract. And its terms, it is clear that the defendant is a debtor of the defendant, 2 and 3 is the guarantor. It is shown that the three defendants as the explicit guarantee that the private The three defendants claimed that it signed on behalf of the defendant, a corporation which is not. The defendants, three were not authorized to bind the defendant, a part of the notice to call the defendant to three when the plaintiff notice of claim accused 1 and accused of a default, then the plaintiff will have claims to the defendant. 3, which guarantees payment of the debt immediately and without notice to the defendant under Section 686 of the three will receive a notice of claim or not. The third defendant is released from liability.
Contractual guarantees defendants 2 and 3, the defendant agreed to guarantee the debt of U.S. $ 63.2 million to 1 in the amount of debt which is secured overdraft. And the amount of debt that a defendant may be increased or reduced by the introduction of money into and withdraw from the account. Any time a defendant owes the full amount guaranteed by the guarantors are jointly liable to the full amount of support. Insurance, with interest from the date of withdrawal is the amount of guarantee as early, but if I had the first of which is due to the cash payment deductive account until the debt is lower than the amount of guarantee the guarantor shall not be liable. debt, the defendant shall be paid an amount equal to the rest until the full disbursement of new loan guarantees, the guarantor will be liable for the full amount plus interest is guaranteed. Guarantor, the guarantor will be liable for the full amount plus interest from the date of any Must consider the defendant owed the plaintiff a full amount of guarantees. When the last defendant in a debt the plaintiff the full amount of the guarantee contract is dated November 1, 2527 the defendant, 2 and 3, we have to pay interest to the plaintiff from the date of November 1, 2527 onwards, however, the loan disbursement. exceed the account between the plaintiff and the defendant an end on April 2, 2528 the defendant, 2 and 3, we have interest to the plaintiff from the date of November 1, 2527 onwards till April 2, 2528, the end of the contract only. After that, no compounding of interest until payment is made to the plaintiff. Shall bear interest at the same rate as the first defendant and the need to deposit at the time the card is listed in the current account. On the outstanding account balance down to 2 and 3, the defendant's liability to a defendant as well.
Supreme Court in 7630/2540.
The notice shall be mortgaged. That the plaintiff filed a lecture. Plaintiff's attorney was authorized to issue a written notice to the defendant to five mortgage payments and redemption of particular plaintiff a copy of Power of Attorney and a copy of the notice. To repay the loan. Overdraft loan debt. Debt guarantees. And to redeem the mortgage by the end of the indictment. It is part of the indictment. In addition, the complaint, the plaintiff's request to be clearly stated. The five defendants were able to fight the lawsuit was not lost to the defense. The plaintiff sued, so do not be vague
President of the plaintiff Bank authorized signature. Hand, acting on behalf of a plaintiff. Without the seal of the plaintiff, the Bank President has the power of attorney for the plaintiff. I pursue this instead. As well as giving notice to the defendant by the five settlements. The plaintiff's attorney has an attorney general that I can use in the prosecution of any person, when a dispute arises between the person with the plaintiff about the plaintiff's business as it has been assigned. The plaintiff need not specify them. It has the power to sue any defendant specifically the plaintiff's attorney I have sued the defendants, five of these cases.
Defendant to pay a debt to the plaintiff, by the way broken down into loan account. The plaintiff's evidence, a receipt will be issued to the defendant at a time and a notification that a deductive account the defendant's agreement, when it was deducted from the loan account to account by this method. The said defendant did not know that an argument against. This case held that a defendant implicitly consented to such action by a defendant is liable in the amount of the contract, the plaintiff's account to the deductive account.
The loan overdraft is not the time to end it, the plaintiff has notice of claim to the defendant that a borrower's payment within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice of the defendant a receipt to each I do not pay the debt. It is an event of default. As a result, the current contract ends on the due date. Notice. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest until then.
Section 728 is not provided for how much time is reasonable. Must be considered to be the case.
Notice to the defendant by the plaintiff to enforce the mortgage term to repay the debt within 30 days, although the plaintiff claims the defendant's claim. A payment of up to U.S. $ 9,799,838.75, which is time enough in which to earn money for a defendant to pay plaintiff. Period is a reasonable time. So like I told the mortgage.
Supreme Court in 5902/2540.
The notice required under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 728 mortgage shall be made in writing only. Not defined as a set. District Court authorized the notice of the mortgage to the defendant. I have not authorized by a written notice to the mortgagee on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was subsequently appointed to the District Attorney to prosecute the defendant's mortgage. The plaintiff has testified that the District Attorney to enforce a mortgage given to the defendant. The plaintiff had been ratified by notice to the defendant know the mortgage. Notice the mortgage of the plaintiff law is void.
Supreme Court in 5640/2540.
The Sun is a land dispute over the lessor of the mortgage and bank charges. The mortgage on the land dispute at public auction to pay debt service. For use as a. Sun wants to sell rice. The transfer of a mortgage loan in the amount of outstanding mortgage debt is not. But the story was. Sat or Sun was forced to land or property to be seized for public auction to pay. Mortgage repayments to creditors, the mortgagee under the authority of the laws regarding debt. Mortgages and the mortgage is provided as a special way. Trading in the auction of the court in such cases. It's not that the lessor in the sale of rice. Agricultural Land Act 2524, Section 53, first paragraph.
She has worked with all three. F. Land dispute from the auction of real Enter the name of the petitioner in the three official land is required. According to a report ordered by a court order stating that a public auction. F. One is buying it. It may be that the three who sings with a land dispute. F. From the beginning anyway. The petitioner and three. May. To the official registration of the land, who sings these three phones. With the property. F. Truthfully. It has a land dispute between them. F. Sung with all three. So she joined the three as a matter of buying land. Sat landlords who rent from the auction of the court. Land disputes can not be refunded to those who oppose the lease. Agricultural Land Act 2524 Section 54.
Supreme Court in 4143/2535.
I made a compromise with the defendant that the defendant refused to transfer the disputed land to the petitioner if the breach of contract claim. Effective immediately and shall be sentenced according to his intention to transfer the defendant when the court ruling. By then it is strictly prohibited. Petitioner shall be entitled to the verdict. To force registration of rights under Section 1300 of the Civil and Commercial Code, the petitioner has the right to request to suspend enforcement of the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the mortgage. The court sentenced the defendant.
