Section 472 if the property is sold one or more defects which cause. Depreciation or impairment of benefits appropriate to the intended use is common. Benefits intended by the agreement. You, the seller is liable.
And discussed in this section is small. The seller already know or do not know that the defect exists.
Section 473 suppliers shall not be liable in the case later this.
(1) if the buyer knows that but in dealing with defects or should be. Know if such an exercise caution should be predictable, but of ordinary prudence.
(2) if the defect shall be proven in time to deliver. And the buyer took the property without reluctant to say or do anything
(3) if such property was acquired.
Section 474 in an liability for defects that You shall not bring a lawsuit after one year from the time when the defect was found.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4672/2551.
The plaintiff filed this lawsuit to force the defendant requested the transfer of car registration dispute as a plaintiff to dispute the plaintiff's automobile can be used for the purposes of contracts. Find it sued to force the defendant liable for liquidated damages because of defects of motor vehicles does not dispute the liability of the defendant is not subject to the 1-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 474, but must be subject to the general age. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of 10 years old and unmarried.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8635/2550.
In the purchase of the defendant King Longan varieties have been appointed by the Board of Directors, which supplies it is a. Chairman. But doing so is a matter within the administration of the affairs of the defendant. The contracts did not have an agreement that the award will be made by the articles. Directors appointed to the parcel to the defendant. The defendant's statement is not binding orator King led the plaintiff to deliver longan varieties to the defendant within the time prescribed by the contract and am a. a chairman and managing director respectively of the defendants received the King. Longan varieties from the plaintiff and the plaintiff to be delivered to the village headman. As proof of delivery King Longan varieties. A circumstance which shows clearly that the defendant received the King Longan cv. The plaintiff has not objected to by the King and longan cultivars are incomplete or invalid contract.
Proof of Delivery King Longan varieties that have signed a. am and as a board to deliver packages, it says. Committee to deliver supplies delivered to King Longan varieties such village. To be delivered to people in their village to go. Such statements indicate that the defendant had been examined and presented King Longan varieties already not only been presented to the Board of Directors for the package to examine When the defendant received the King longan varieties from the plaintiff by the contract are accurate and complete. Defendant has no right to terminate the contract and forfeit the deposit of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 66 - 67/2547.
House where the defendant purchased from plaintiff's defect. And the plaintiff did not complete the repair. When the defects in the property transaction. The seller is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 defendants buyers prefer to withhold the price has not been made in full or in part. Unless the seller is to find the appropriate insurance to meet the Commercial Code, Section 488 of the plaintiff that the plaintiff's petition to get the third party claim in good faith not Involve an agreement to buy land and houses for sale between the defendant company. And the defendant can be sued by the company such that That the plaintiff was managing director of the company representatives and agents throughout the whole record, while the transfer of claims. Ensure that the plaintiff has to repair the damage all by themselves. Although the defendant to issue five checks made payable to the record the transfer of debt claims. But it was a continuance from the drop down cost of land and house as promised. Buy and sell land and houses. Listening in on the fact that the plaintiff's home does not repair the defect successfully. Defendant does not like to withhold payment for the land and house without the deposit payment such as the defendant is not guilty. Act on the offense caused by the Article 4 checks.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4974/2545.
Car hire is the defendant shall have the obligation to deliver a copy of car registration and plate License plate to the plaintiff the lease. Because a copy of the license plate, car registration and car is essential in a car. The defendant delivered to plaintiff under the contract hire car by car no right to use state. Accompanied by a useful purpose by leasing. Therefore liable to plaintiffs under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472, Section 549 of the defendant is at fault lease. Be attributed to the company arising from the PM, a third party. Car registration is not transferred to the defendant can not Because leasing is a reciprocal agreement. Contract when the defendant is at fault the plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the lease and not pay. The lease under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369.
Defendant's breach of contract because the parties can not manage to modify the hire car in working condition in accordance with Benefits intended by the agreement. The plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the contract under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 387 can be considered to terminate the lease by the plaintiff well The plaintiff need not return the defendant before the delivery vehicle. Due to termination by the property back to their respective owners. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 573 is a provision granting the right to terminate the contract of lease in the absence of breach of contract, so when the parties to terminate the contract by the love and need each party to the other party. As the party returned to the same address under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 391 by the plaintiff to return to car disputes to the defendant and the payment of the value of car usage. Vehicle dispute with the defendant. The defendant had to hire to restore the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1223/2545.
Defects in the property sold, the seller is liable to the buyer under the Penal Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 will have a defect that has already or currently have contracts. Or when the property sold. The defects that later. The seller liable for not doing so when the plaintiff and crystal factory installed tank, the defendant then contracts. Defendant has manufacturing operations to MSG for about two months before the problem or damage to the stirred tank in series crystal The plaintiff is not liable for such defects.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 464/2545.
The plaintiff's complaint is that the plaintiff claimed that the defendant sold to plaintiff's car is. Defect of the transmission system which supplies the defendants guarantee that there will repair or replace the plaintiff is forced to the defendant, repair or change gears to the plaintiff so that the user normally, but the request end up filing the plaintiff to ask to force the defendant to pay money. equal car. Vehicle dispute that the plaintiff purchased from defendant or the defendant to bring a new car that looks. Like cars and condition dispute is best to change the plaintiff. This is in addition to the guarantee of the defendant. The plaintiff would not force the defendant based on the agreement so as to guarantee the request. The court can not enforce.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5584/2544.
Defects caused by the wall, some of the cracks between the walls. A mortar or in a surface with aluminum frame of the door window boundaries. Some drugs do not completely or not silicon around the rain can be absorbed into it. A defect which is not apparent in the delivery time. When a heavy rain to absorb rainwater, so will know that such a defect. Although plaintiff's representatives to survey review. It is to check that any property damage only some But such persons have no knowledge about construction The representative plaintiff for the plaintiff offered expert to examine the plaintiff and that the district hired to inspect the company's actions are reasonable. Assumes that the plaintiff discover the defect but it is not time. A. When the check comes and offers complete repair list for the plaintiff to know. It can be seen that the plaintiff defect since that time. The plaintiff filed the case but before the end of time one year from the date the plaintiff's case is not lack of prescription
Judgement of the Supreme Court 951/2544.
The plaintiff to lease the property to which the lease. The appropriate conditions for use. When the car has not yet made registration disputes and pie plates. The plaintiff has the duty to provide to the defendant. Because the document is significant in a car must be held by the Director. Easy to register for car hire as defined in the lease. The car dispute that the plaintiff delivered to defendant a condition not suitable to be used. Without license plates and tags provide a circle to the defendant. The plaintiff is the defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 of Article 549 because the lease agreement is reciprocal. When the plaintiff is at fault contract Defendant shall have the right not to pay the purchase by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369 of the defendant fails to pay the lease to the plaintiff the defendant is not considered.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9034/2543.
Although the plaintiff has purchased the car from the defendant to dispute the payment of a car reservations as well as some of the cars. And received the car from the defendant to a plaintiff, but whether it confirms that Plaintiff's contract with the leasing company with Bank of the floor and show clearly that the plaintiff has admitted that its Bank Limited is the owner of the car dispute. Yes, for the defendant, a plaintiff would not otherwise do not pay for a purchase annuities to companies throughout the Bank, Ltd. The company has issued a receipt for each installment. Even the book value car Until the plaintiff has terminated the contract hire car with Bank Limited, the company has handed the car. The first plaintiff and the defendant is determined by the nature of the contract Nitiseampoanht incompatible. With respect to the second defendant did not appear. The plaintiff is bound by any agreement that will be liable for defects of Dispute the plaintiff's car. Alone only guarantee that If you have trouble selling cars can be repaired at dealers and service centers. At the center of the second defendant that the defendant does not mean that two binding liable for defects of cars that the plaintiff was authorized to hire-purchase property because of liability in the event that the plaintiff would hire a defect. Singing from the lease directly Plaintiff has no authority to sue the two defendants liable for defects of Leasing the property during the time hire them.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8088/2543.
The plaintiff purchased three townhouses in the dispute after recently completed a new state of the defendant. And to residential use only 6 months, then the defect in several key items. And may not be living a normal, happy or right to benefits intended to use Continue as normal. The defect before the appropriate time. Yes, it is to find the defects caused by the nature of Interiors. Defendant seller would be liable for defects of the townhouse that the Commercial Code, Section 472.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6976/2542.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to pay a price for fish meal, the defendants owe the plaintiff to the defendant. Fighting that fish meal delivered to the plaintiff the defendant has other additives. The defendant has been damaged more than the amount the plaintiff asked to dismiss claims on the fact that after the defendant had been a fish meal and feather contamination. Order the defendant to the plaintiff, fish meal for another 30 cars trucks shows that even the fish meal. The plaintiff will have some feather contamination is likely to be minimal. Not even the defendant's chicken slow growth of the fish meal contaminated with chicken feathers. Is not even considered selling the property that is the case, which causes defects. Depreciation or impairment of the right to benefits intended to be used as a regular. The plaintiff, the seller is liable to the defendant buyer under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 the defendant has no right to withhold the price has not been paid to the plaintiff under Section 488.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7806/2540.
ivil and Commercial Code Section 472 states that the seller be liable to the buyer in a defect in the property sold and the buyer has the right to withhold the unpaid price the seller will be required under Section 488. a defect that has already or currently have contracts. Or when the property sold. The defects that later. The seller liable for not
Ice machines that the defendant purchased from plaintiff. Produced 15,000 kg of ice per 24 hours, according to the agreement. Due to technical equipment away from the compressor tube ice making too many weak ammonia pressure. The intake valve and exhaust break A defect that was later handed to the defendant and the defendant then use it is required to pay the outstanding payment to the plaintiff. The installation of the plaintiff and the defect is how The plaintiff must address the defendant or not. It is the defendant shall be conducted under terms of its existing one. Defendant may claim as a reason the price is not willing to withhold settlement to the plaintiff was not looking.
That a defendant has to pay to buy a tube of ice to the plaintiff for the last time on July 21, 2532 the plaintiff's claim is that a merchant has run out of the delivery. Given to the defendant. And the accused used to buy ice tube ice sold out. Thus made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. Therefore the 5-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit on October 16, 2535 to no more than 5 years did not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Interest that the plaintiff sued the defendant. Liability because the plaintiff failed payment. Interest was given instead of damages, the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, paragraph one, and no law specifically prescription. Therefore the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 is not the case, which were of interest payable under section 193 / 33 5 years (1).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9653/2539.
The plaintiff sent the defendant a paper weight must not be agreed by size is delivered. Property for sale from the wrong type of agreement in the contract holds that the plaintiff fails to pay the debt. The true purpose of debt repayment is not operating under contract no. Yes, on the defects in the property sold to pay debts because of the process. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 to enforce the provisions by failing to pay debts generally.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5466/2539.
Defendant agreed to sell the rights to lease land and building lease agreement from the defendant Housing Authority. National plaintiff by the defendant the plaintiff agreed to ผnonsnong money in a period which Repayment to the plaintiff to the defendant of 62,000 baht agreement is not made. Although the book is an agreement to agree to put the rights of the plaintiff. The defendants are the National Housing Authority of the transferred land. Building on the matter, but plaintiffs did not sue to enforce the National Housing Authority to transfer land. Building a plaintiff must be in force on the transfer of rights to force the plaintiff to sue. Defendant to comply with an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant about the right of land lease. With the building of the National Housing Rights such as leasing the property type. One that can be traded to the agreement, it is not even made the right purchase. In writing, but there has been a debt due to this sale, some already have one. Bonding between the seller and the plaintiff accused the plaintiff buyer has the power to sue under the agreement (diagnosed by the general meeting resolution No. 3 / 2539).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7254/2538.
Defendant purchased from plaintiff and water conditioning settlement on the plaintiff some installations. Defendant successfully without breach of contract. Defendant is liable for the remaining funds to the plaintiff. The water conditioning equipment installed, so that the plaintiff has defected. The plaintiff must be modified to meet that promise. It is the defendant shall be conducted under terms of its existing one. Will be referred to as a reason not to pay the plaintiff can not find.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6144/2538.
Defendant to the plaintiff's contract for ship inspection and boats but boats damaged. The plaintiff was hired as third-party repair and ship the money 1,159,330 Baht disputed use is not damaged until about four years repairing damage done as follows: U.S. 300,000 settlement when the vessel defects cause degradation to the appropriate benefits. Plaintiff intended to use as normal. Defendant, a contractor responsible for the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 595 in conjunction with Section 472.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3496/2538.
Warranty card in the sale of cars, there are exceptions liability for any damage caused. When an accident causes a fire caused by a defect of power cause. Dispute to the car's engine was not damaged due to driving. Negligently collided with another car or other possessions in the street, even though it is outside. Exceeds expectations of the plaintiff and the defendant is not caused by accident, but the defendant must be guilty, even in the warranty card states that the plaintiff will have to repair the car at the mall, but the defendant. When the plaintiff's car parked at the mall disputed the defendant to repair the defendant refused. Liability claims that the accident plaintiff must bring disputes to the car hire another Defendants are liable for the repair cost to repair the plaintiff. Change the value overhaul Bonnet knock the paint label a car parts and accessories. The repair and replacement parts are required to install Engines and components for the car is in reasonable condition for benefits. Intended to be used as regular components that are not considered beyond. Terms of the warranty.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5618/2530.
Defects of the property sold, the seller is liable in accordance with Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472. It must be a defect. Existing before. Or at the time contracts or the delivery time. The defect occurred after the seller liable for not Plaintiff's car from the defendant. While plaintiffs dispute the car from the defendant. Car is already good condition. After the plaintiff has claimed that the car smells as foul. Find the defendant not liable.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2389/2529.
The defendant deliver quality defects to the buyer in a foreign country refuses to accept. Buy sell cause the plaintiff the defendant is not liable for the damage. Such defect the plaintiff is entitled to terminate the contract and claim for damages under processing. Civil and Commercial Section 215,387,391 and 472. Damages that the defendant would be liable to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Section. 222 price is refunded to the defendant to the plaintiff for the plaintiff to pay the freight. Product packaging material cost for the purchase and send to the plaintiff and defendant. The warehouse, which is considered as special damages that the defendant should have anticipated in advance.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5581/2533.
The plaintiff purchased cans for packing fish with tomato sauce from canned defendant when the rust and other defects. That result from the production of the defendant. Which causes the loss of benefits appropriate to the contract intended by the defendant must Liable for damages to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 even if the plaintiff to accept the defendant not reluctant to say or do anything But while the delivery of the defects shall not concrete Defendant also find out from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 473 (2) the defendant knew that plaintiff purchased canned it to be sold to a buyer in Burma and that the plaintiff must pay transportation costs can substitute part. defects to the buyer. More damage is caused, but special circumstances. The defendant was expected to see or should have anticipated the circumstances so before then. Although the number of damages the plaintiff will attest this is not the exact Court determined that the plaintiff is appropriate to the circumstances.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5584/2544.
Defects caused by the wall, some of the cracks between the walls. A mortar or in a surface with aluminum frame of the door window boundaries. Some drugs do not completely or not silicon around the rain can be absorbed into it. A defect which is not apparent in the delivery time. When a heavy rain to absorb rainwater, so will know that such a defect. Although plaintiff's representatives to survey review. It is to check that any property damage only some But such persons have no knowledge about construction The representative plaintiff for the plaintiff offered expert to examine the plaintiff and that the district hired to inspect the company's actions are reasonable. Assumes that the plaintiff discover the defect but it is not time. A. When the check comes and offers complete repair list for the plaintiff to know. It can be seen that the plaintiff defect since that time. The plaintiff filed the case but before the end of time one year from the date the plaintiff's case is not lack of prescription
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8339/2540.
To refund the excess payment if the plaintiff did not deliver exactly what is required. Specified in the contract that the plaintiff is not required to pay the debt upon request. True of debt. Yes, for the liability for defects, which were the first years of this case and no law on age, specifically age, has 10 years, according to the Commercial Code, Section 164 (same).
And discussed in this section is small. The seller already know or do not know that the defect exists.
Section 473 suppliers shall not be liable in the case later this.
(1) if the buyer knows that but in dealing with defects or should be. Know if such an exercise caution should be predictable, but of ordinary prudence.
(2) if the defect shall be proven in time to deliver. And the buyer took the property without reluctant to say or do anything
(3) if such property was acquired.
Section 474 in an liability for defects that You shall not bring a lawsuit after one year from the time when the defect was found.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4672/2551.
The plaintiff filed this lawsuit to force the defendant requested the transfer of car registration dispute as a plaintiff to dispute the plaintiff's automobile can be used for the purposes of contracts. Find it sued to force the defendant liable for liquidated damages because of defects of motor vehicles does not dispute the liability of the defendant is not subject to the 1-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 474, but must be subject to the general age. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of 10 years old and unmarried.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8635/2550.
In the purchase of the defendant King Longan varieties have been appointed by the Board of Directors, which supplies it is a. Chairman. But doing so is a matter within the administration of the affairs of the defendant. The contracts did not have an agreement that the award will be made by the articles. Directors appointed to the parcel to the defendant. The defendant's statement is not binding orator King led the plaintiff to deliver longan varieties to the defendant within the time prescribed by the contract and am a. a chairman and managing director respectively of the defendants received the King. Longan varieties from the plaintiff and the plaintiff to be delivered to the village headman. As proof of delivery King Longan varieties. A circumstance which shows clearly that the defendant received the King Longan cv. The plaintiff has not objected to by the King and longan cultivars are incomplete or invalid contract.
Proof of Delivery King Longan varieties that have signed a. am and as a board to deliver packages, it says. Committee to deliver supplies delivered to King Longan varieties such village. To be delivered to people in their village to go. Such statements indicate that the defendant had been examined and presented King Longan varieties already not only been presented to the Board of Directors for the package to examine When the defendant received the King longan varieties from the plaintiff by the contract are accurate and complete. Defendant has no right to terminate the contract and forfeit the deposit of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 66 - 67/2547.
House where the defendant purchased from plaintiff's defect. And the plaintiff did not complete the repair. When the defects in the property transaction. The seller is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 defendants buyers prefer to withhold the price has not been made in full or in part. Unless the seller is to find the appropriate insurance to meet the Commercial Code, Section 488 of the plaintiff that the plaintiff's petition to get the third party claim in good faith not Involve an agreement to buy land and houses for sale between the defendant company. And the defendant can be sued by the company such that That the plaintiff was managing director of the company representatives and agents throughout the whole record, while the transfer of claims. Ensure that the plaintiff has to repair the damage all by themselves. Although the defendant to issue five checks made payable to the record the transfer of debt claims. But it was a continuance from the drop down cost of land and house as promised. Buy and sell land and houses. Listening in on the fact that the plaintiff's home does not repair the defect successfully. Defendant does not like to withhold payment for the land and house without the deposit payment such as the defendant is not guilty. Act on the offense caused by the Article 4 checks.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4974/2545.
Car hire is the defendant shall have the obligation to deliver a copy of car registration and plate License plate to the plaintiff the lease. Because a copy of the license plate, car registration and car is essential in a car. The defendant delivered to plaintiff under the contract hire car by car no right to use state. Accompanied by a useful purpose by leasing. Therefore liable to plaintiffs under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472, Section 549 of the defendant is at fault lease. Be attributed to the company arising from the PM, a third party. Car registration is not transferred to the defendant can not Because leasing is a reciprocal agreement. Contract when the defendant is at fault the plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the lease and not pay. The lease under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369.
Defendant's breach of contract because the parties can not manage to modify the hire car in working condition in accordance with Benefits intended by the agreement. The plaintiff shall have the right to terminate the contract under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 387 can be considered to terminate the lease by the plaintiff well The plaintiff need not return the defendant before the delivery vehicle. Due to termination by the property back to their respective owners. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 573 is a provision granting the right to terminate the contract of lease in the absence of breach of contract, so when the parties to terminate the contract by the love and need each party to the other party. As the party returned to the same address under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 391 by the plaintiff to return to car disputes to the defendant and the payment of the value of car usage. Vehicle dispute with the defendant. The defendant had to hire to restore the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1223/2545.
Defects in the property sold, the seller is liable to the buyer under the Penal Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 will have a defect that has already or currently have contracts. Or when the property sold. The defects that later. The seller liable for not doing so when the plaintiff and crystal factory installed tank, the defendant then contracts. Defendant has manufacturing operations to MSG for about two months before the problem or damage to the stirred tank in series crystal The plaintiff is not liable for such defects.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 464/2545.
The plaintiff's complaint is that the plaintiff claimed that the defendant sold to plaintiff's car is. Defect of the transmission system which supplies the defendants guarantee that there will repair or replace the plaintiff is forced to the defendant, repair or change gears to the plaintiff so that the user normally, but the request end up filing the plaintiff to ask to force the defendant to pay money. equal car. Vehicle dispute that the plaintiff purchased from defendant or the defendant to bring a new car that looks. Like cars and condition dispute is best to change the plaintiff. This is in addition to the guarantee of the defendant. The plaintiff would not force the defendant based on the agreement so as to guarantee the request. The court can not enforce.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5584/2544.
Defects caused by the wall, some of the cracks between the walls. A mortar or in a surface with aluminum frame of the door window boundaries. Some drugs do not completely or not silicon around the rain can be absorbed into it. A defect which is not apparent in the delivery time. When a heavy rain to absorb rainwater, so will know that such a defect. Although plaintiff's representatives to survey review. It is to check that any property damage only some But such persons have no knowledge about construction The representative plaintiff for the plaintiff offered expert to examine the plaintiff and that the district hired to inspect the company's actions are reasonable. Assumes that the plaintiff discover the defect but it is not time. A. When the check comes and offers complete repair list for the plaintiff to know. It can be seen that the plaintiff defect since that time. The plaintiff filed the case but before the end of time one year from the date the plaintiff's case is not lack of prescription
Judgement of the Supreme Court 951/2544.
The plaintiff to lease the property to which the lease. The appropriate conditions for use. When the car has not yet made registration disputes and pie plates. The plaintiff has the duty to provide to the defendant. Because the document is significant in a car must be held by the Director. Easy to register for car hire as defined in the lease. The car dispute that the plaintiff delivered to defendant a condition not suitable to be used. Without license plates and tags provide a circle to the defendant. The plaintiff is the defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 of Article 549 because the lease agreement is reciprocal. When the plaintiff is at fault contract Defendant shall have the right not to pay the purchase by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 369 of the defendant fails to pay the lease to the plaintiff the defendant is not considered.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9034/2543.
Although the plaintiff has purchased the car from the defendant to dispute the payment of a car reservations as well as some of the cars. And received the car from the defendant to a plaintiff, but whether it confirms that Plaintiff's contract with the leasing company with Bank of the floor and show clearly that the plaintiff has admitted that its Bank Limited is the owner of the car dispute. Yes, for the defendant, a plaintiff would not otherwise do not pay for a purchase annuities to companies throughout the Bank, Ltd. The company has issued a receipt for each installment. Even the book value car Until the plaintiff has terminated the contract hire car with Bank Limited, the company has handed the car. The first plaintiff and the defendant is determined by the nature of the contract Nitiseampoanht incompatible. With respect to the second defendant did not appear. The plaintiff is bound by any agreement that will be liable for defects of Dispute the plaintiff's car. Alone only guarantee that If you have trouble selling cars can be repaired at dealers and service centers. At the center of the second defendant that the defendant does not mean that two binding liable for defects of cars that the plaintiff was authorized to hire-purchase property because of liability in the event that the plaintiff would hire a defect. Singing from the lease directly Plaintiff has no authority to sue the two defendants liable for defects of Leasing the property during the time hire them.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8088/2543.
The plaintiff purchased three townhouses in the dispute after recently completed a new state of the defendant. And to residential use only 6 months, then the defect in several key items. And may not be living a normal, happy or right to benefits intended to use Continue as normal. The defect before the appropriate time. Yes, it is to find the defects caused by the nature of Interiors. Defendant seller would be liable for defects of the townhouse that the Commercial Code, Section 472.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6976/2542.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to pay a price for fish meal, the defendants owe the plaintiff to the defendant. Fighting that fish meal delivered to the plaintiff the defendant has other additives. The defendant has been damaged more than the amount the plaintiff asked to dismiss claims on the fact that after the defendant had been a fish meal and feather contamination. Order the defendant to the plaintiff, fish meal for another 30 cars trucks shows that even the fish meal. The plaintiff will have some feather contamination is likely to be minimal. Not even the defendant's chicken slow growth of the fish meal contaminated with chicken feathers. Is not even considered selling the property that is the case, which causes defects. Depreciation or impairment of the right to benefits intended to be used as a regular. The plaintiff, the seller is liable to the defendant buyer under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 the defendant has no right to withhold the price has not been paid to the plaintiff under Section 488.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7806/2540.
ivil and Commercial Code Section 472 states that the seller be liable to the buyer in a defect in the property sold and the buyer has the right to withhold the unpaid price the seller will be required under Section 488. a defect that has already or currently have contracts. Or when the property sold. The defects that later. The seller liable for not
Ice machines that the defendant purchased from plaintiff. Produced 15,000 kg of ice per 24 hours, according to the agreement. Due to technical equipment away from the compressor tube ice making too many weak ammonia pressure. The intake valve and exhaust break A defect that was later handed to the defendant and the defendant then use it is required to pay the outstanding payment to the plaintiff. The installation of the plaintiff and the defect is how The plaintiff must address the defendant or not. It is the defendant shall be conducted under terms of its existing one. Defendant may claim as a reason the price is not willing to withhold settlement to the plaintiff was not looking.
That a defendant has to pay to buy a tube of ice to the plaintiff for the last time on July 21, 2532 the plaintiff's claim is that a merchant has run out of the delivery. Given to the defendant. And the accused used to buy ice tube ice sold out. Thus made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. Therefore the 5-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit on October 16, 2535 to no more than 5 years did not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Interest that the plaintiff sued the defendant. Liability because the plaintiff failed payment. Interest was given instead of damages, the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, paragraph one, and no law specifically prescription. Therefore the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 is not the case, which were of interest payable under section 193 / 33 5 years (1).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9653/2539.
The plaintiff sent the defendant a paper weight must not be agreed by size is delivered. Property for sale from the wrong type of agreement in the contract holds that the plaintiff fails to pay the debt. The true purpose of debt repayment is not operating under contract no. Yes, on the defects in the property sold to pay debts because of the process. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 to enforce the provisions by failing to pay debts generally.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5466/2539.
Defendant agreed to sell the rights to lease land and building lease agreement from the defendant Housing Authority. National plaintiff by the defendant the plaintiff agreed to ผnonsnong money in a period which Repayment to the plaintiff to the defendant of 62,000 baht agreement is not made. Although the book is an agreement to agree to put the rights of the plaintiff. The defendants are the National Housing Authority of the transferred land. Building on the matter, but plaintiffs did not sue to enforce the National Housing Authority to transfer land. Building a plaintiff must be in force on the transfer of rights to force the plaintiff to sue. Defendant to comply with an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant about the right of land lease. With the building of the National Housing Rights such as leasing the property type. One that can be traded to the agreement, it is not even made the right purchase. In writing, but there has been a debt due to this sale, some already have one. Bonding between the seller and the plaintiff accused the plaintiff buyer has the power to sue under the agreement (diagnosed by the general meeting resolution No. 3 / 2539).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7254/2538.
Defendant purchased from plaintiff and water conditioning settlement on the plaintiff some installations. Defendant successfully without breach of contract. Defendant is liable for the remaining funds to the plaintiff. The water conditioning equipment installed, so that the plaintiff has defected. The plaintiff must be modified to meet that promise. It is the defendant shall be conducted under terms of its existing one. Will be referred to as a reason not to pay the plaintiff can not find.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6144/2538.
Defendant to the plaintiff's contract for ship inspection and boats but boats damaged. The plaintiff was hired as third-party repair and ship the money 1,159,330 Baht disputed use is not damaged until about four years repairing damage done as follows: U.S. 300,000 settlement when the vessel defects cause degradation to the appropriate benefits. Plaintiff intended to use as normal. Defendant, a contractor responsible for the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 595 in conjunction with Section 472.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3496/2538.
Warranty card in the sale of cars, there are exceptions liability for any damage caused. When an accident causes a fire caused by a defect of power cause. Dispute to the car's engine was not damaged due to driving. Negligently collided with another car or other possessions in the street, even though it is outside. Exceeds expectations of the plaintiff and the defendant is not caused by accident, but the defendant must be guilty, even in the warranty card states that the plaintiff will have to repair the car at the mall, but the defendant. When the plaintiff's car parked at the mall disputed the defendant to repair the defendant refused. Liability claims that the accident plaintiff must bring disputes to the car hire another Defendants are liable for the repair cost to repair the plaintiff. Change the value overhaul Bonnet knock the paint label a car parts and accessories. The repair and replacement parts are required to install Engines and components for the car is in reasonable condition for benefits. Intended to be used as regular components that are not considered beyond. Terms of the warranty.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5618/2530.
Defects of the property sold, the seller is liable in accordance with Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472. It must be a defect. Existing before. Or at the time contracts or the delivery time. The defect occurred after the seller liable for not Plaintiff's car from the defendant. While plaintiffs dispute the car from the defendant. Car is already good condition. After the plaintiff has claimed that the car smells as foul. Find the defendant not liable.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2389/2529.
The defendant deliver quality defects to the buyer in a foreign country refuses to accept. Buy sell cause the plaintiff the defendant is not liable for the damage. Such defect the plaintiff is entitled to terminate the contract and claim for damages under processing. Civil and Commercial Section 215,387,391 and 472. Damages that the defendant would be liable to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Section. 222 price is refunded to the defendant to the plaintiff for the plaintiff to pay the freight. Product packaging material cost for the purchase and send to the plaintiff and defendant. The warehouse, which is considered as special damages that the defendant should have anticipated in advance.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5581/2533.
The plaintiff purchased cans for packing fish with tomato sauce from canned defendant when the rust and other defects. That result from the production of the defendant. Which causes the loss of benefits appropriate to the contract intended by the defendant must Liable for damages to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 even if the plaintiff to accept the defendant not reluctant to say or do anything But while the delivery of the defects shall not concrete Defendant also find out from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 473 (2) the defendant knew that plaintiff purchased canned it to be sold to a buyer in Burma and that the plaintiff must pay transportation costs can substitute part. defects to the buyer. More damage is caused, but special circumstances. The defendant was expected to see or should have anticipated the circumstances so before then. Although the number of damages the plaintiff will attest this is not the exact Court determined that the plaintiff is appropriate to the circumstances.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5584/2544.
Defects caused by the wall, some of the cracks between the walls. A mortar or in a surface with aluminum frame of the door window boundaries. Some drugs do not completely or not silicon around the rain can be absorbed into it. A defect which is not apparent in the delivery time. When a heavy rain to absorb rainwater, so will know that such a defect. Although plaintiff's representatives to survey review. It is to check that any property damage only some But such persons have no knowledge about construction The representative plaintiff for the plaintiff offered expert to examine the plaintiff and that the district hired to inspect the company's actions are reasonable. Assumes that the plaintiff discover the defect but it is not time. A. When the check comes and offers complete repair list for the plaintiff to know. It can be seen that the plaintiff defect since that time. The plaintiff filed the case but before the end of time one year from the date the plaintiff's case is not lack of prescription
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8339/2540.
To refund the excess payment if the plaintiff did not deliver exactly what is required. Specified in the contract that the plaintiff is not required to pay the debt upon request. True of debt. Yes, for the liability for defects, which were the first years of this case and no law on age, specifically age, has 10 years, according to the Commercial Code, Section 164 (same).
