Section 736 transferee of assets which will redeem the mortgage or mortgages. If it is not the debtor or guarantor. Or a descendant of the debtor or guarantor.
Section 737 transfer to redeem the mortgage at any time. However, if the mortgagee has notice of intention to enforce a mortgage that soon. Assignee to redeem the mortgage within one month from the date of your notice.
Section 738 requires the transferee who wishes to redeem the mortgaged it to the notice of intention. The most loans. And must be submitted to the creditors who have registered. In no way, mortgage or otherwise. I will use the money for a reasonable price of the property.
The offer shall have the following message.
(1) the source and nature of the mortgaged property.
(2) The transfer of ownership.
(3) the name of the original owner.
(4) the name and domicile of the assignee.
(5) the amount proposed to be used.
(6) calculate the amount owed to a creditor as well as the equipment and the amount will be payable by those using them.
In addition, a copy of the official report listed the property which is mortgaged. The official certification that a copy be sent to the line only.
Section 739 credit if one person does not accept the offer. The creditors must be filed with the court within one month from the date of the offer to them. Court orders auction of the mortgaged property. But the creditor must, as is the following.
(1) the court fees, advance public auction.
(2) must fight for themselves. The people I fight for an amount higher than the proposed transferee.
(3) he did not notice that the transferee and the other creditors who have registered. With the property owner and the debtor's primary as well.
Section 740 if the auction has advanced a net amount of money offered to the transferee. He was released to the transferee court fees in the auction. If it does not state the amount the creditors will be asked to auction off.
Section 741 on its offer to creditors to satisfy everyone by expressly or implicitly expressed it, that they shall be redeemable preferred stock, mortgage or transfer the money. The deposit amount will be used for debt service.
Section 742 is forced to withdraw from mortgage mortgage mortgages property which causes it to slip from their property, but soon it will slip away so that the property can have no retroactive effect. And preferential creditors are the property of the slip to the north. Property and registered it. Would have preferred to stay in the back of the creditors of the mortgagor. The previous owner had registered it.
In this case, if I have any rights over the mortgaged property, which is harmful to you or any person. Mortgaged property which has previously been suspended for a while to swallow normally. Property that gem. You are right back to you, or harm another person. When property is mortgaged to slip away.
Section 743 if the transferee has made the mortgage assets or depreciation due to the action. Of their negligence. As a result, creditors have the right mortgage or preferential rights over the property. It must be soon. That the transferee is liable for the damage. However, the transferee will take any amount of money which he has left. Or to reimburse their costs and improve the property. You know what I might call. The proliferation of such property unless the price up. It is known only to the extent of proliferation on the auction price only.
Supreme Court in 5484/2549.
To be sued again by Civil Procedure Code Section 148 must be the case that the court has sentenced a final order by any of the issues. Any reason then. The same pair was indicted in the demolition issue. Based on the same grounds that it did not. Red Bank, 9861/2544, but for a number of civil court cases, the plaintiff sued to enforce loan repayment, plus interest and forced Sun to Wed fails to pay the mortgage principal and interest to the plaintiff. The defendant is a buyer from the auction of the mortgaged property in a civil case number 11353/2534 red on Wed Aug creditors under the court's ruling to the mortgaged property to repay the money even if the defendant is a buyer for Sat. mortgaged property. But it is not a party defendant in a civil case No. 9861/2544, the plaintiff sued the Red Bank, May, and the defendant has the right to redeem mortgaged under Section 736 on the defendant and the plaintiff is not paying off your mortgage notice. the mortgage to the defendant under section 735, but the defendant ignored the plaintiff's right to dispute the defendant after the plaintiff's lawsuit. Red Bank, Civil No. 9861/2544 of the Court of First Instance. The case that the plaintiff sued the defendant in this case is different with the Red Bank, civil case No. 9861/2544 of the Court. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit can not be sued again.
Supreme Court in 1115/2549.
The defendant purchased the mortgaged property from the auction of the primary plaintiff in the case of a mortgage holder has the right to expropriate property in question is old, but find Make the defendant liable to the plaintiff as a mortgage, but it does not. As the defendant is a transferee of property mortgages. The rights and obligations as provided in Civil and Commercial Code a defendant is entitled to redeem the mortgage by offering money for a reasonable price. Assets. If the plaintiff is not acceptable. The plaintiff must be filed with the court within one month from the date of the tender offer. The court ordered auction of the mortgaged property. Accordance with the provisions of Section 738 and 739, and if the defendant did not exercise the redemption of mortgage offers. If the plaintiff is the mortgagee. I have a letter of notice to the defendant one month in advance and then mortgaged under Section 735 to require that when a defendant is not a mortgage to buy property adjacent to the plaintiff's rights. The verdict is due in Case No. 20768/2535, the plaintiff sued the red to the property the debtor to court immediately. Defendants are not parties to the case. Aspects of the case is different as well. When looking for a successor shall be deemed to be the party demanding the demolition. Against each other on issues such as diagnosed by the same. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit is filed is not unique to the District Court Case No. 20768/2535 red. Civil Procedure Code not prohibited by Section 148.
Supreme Court in 3419/2534.
The end of the mortgage contract is terminated as provided in 6 cases. Section 744 describes the plaintiff sued the defendant has made a written request for redemption of the mortgage to the defendant. The defendant did not accept the offer until the expiration of one month, defendant filed a petition with the court to auction the mortgaged property. The defendant did not prosecute. It is considered that the proposed redemption of the defendant to the plaintiff by default under a mortgage of 739,741 but the mortgage will then be extinguished by reason of redemption was upon the plaintiff to the defendant the money. Amount equal to the plaintiff for the amount plus interest, or mortgaged. The plaintiff has the money to put their assets at the office put it. The plaintiffs have not sued the state over such charges that are considered significant. This does not cause the plaintiff's complaint, which will be considered if any of the mortgage contract. Lapsed as permitted by applicable laws. The plaintiff has no right to force the defendant to suspend registration of a mortgage.
Supreme Court in 2692/2526.
Although the Civil and Commercial Law Section 736 737 to the assignee of the mortgage to redeem the mortgaged property. The provision of such material is legal in most states. No law relating to the court. And there are no provisions to be used in court and the verdict is. The defendant's duty to redeem the mortgage before it is transferred to the dispute. The plaintiff's mortgage. The duty of the plaintiff's right to redeem the mortgage, not when the defendant willfully failed to comply with the verdict and Cmbagcab issued to enforce against the defendant. It held that the absence of any other creditors to enforce the verdict will be. Enforceable under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 297 (2) the court has the power to detain defendant.
Supreme Court in 1251/2510.
Defendant to the plaintiff's land. The sale to the petitioner, and not redeemed the property. We went to the petitioner by the mortgage to the plaintiff is entitled to notice. I have the intention to enforce his mortgage to the assignee of the mortgaged property. Of the accused under section 736, 737 on the plaintiff can not sue for the mortgage to the petitioner. She has not a judgment debtor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff does not dispute the right to hold the mortgage to the plaintiff. Because she is an outsider.
The plaintiff is the mortgagee. The right to receive payment of the mortgage assets before ordinary creditor. Hotel guests will have to consider that the ownership of the property was transferred to the third party. Or not in accordance with Section 702 (2).
Section 737 transfer to redeem the mortgage at any time. However, if the mortgagee has notice of intention to enforce a mortgage that soon. Assignee to redeem the mortgage within one month from the date of your notice.
Section 738 requires the transferee who wishes to redeem the mortgaged it to the notice of intention. The most loans. And must be submitted to the creditors who have registered. In no way, mortgage or otherwise. I will use the money for a reasonable price of the property.
The offer shall have the following message.
(1) the source and nature of the mortgaged property.
(2) The transfer of ownership.
(3) the name of the original owner.
(4) the name and domicile of the assignee.
(5) the amount proposed to be used.
(6) calculate the amount owed to a creditor as well as the equipment and the amount will be payable by those using them.
In addition, a copy of the official report listed the property which is mortgaged. The official certification that a copy be sent to the line only.
Section 739 credit if one person does not accept the offer. The creditors must be filed with the court within one month from the date of the offer to them. Court orders auction of the mortgaged property. But the creditor must, as is the following.
(1) the court fees, advance public auction.
(2) must fight for themselves. The people I fight for an amount higher than the proposed transferee.
(3) he did not notice that the transferee and the other creditors who have registered. With the property owner and the debtor's primary as well.
Section 740 if the auction has advanced a net amount of money offered to the transferee. He was released to the transferee court fees in the auction. If it does not state the amount the creditors will be asked to auction off.
Section 741 on its offer to creditors to satisfy everyone by expressly or implicitly expressed it, that they shall be redeemable preferred stock, mortgage or transfer the money. The deposit amount will be used for debt service.
Section 742 is forced to withdraw from mortgage mortgage mortgages property which causes it to slip from their property, but soon it will slip away so that the property can have no retroactive effect. And preferential creditors are the property of the slip to the north. Property and registered it. Would have preferred to stay in the back of the creditors of the mortgagor. The previous owner had registered it.
In this case, if I have any rights over the mortgaged property, which is harmful to you or any person. Mortgaged property which has previously been suspended for a while to swallow normally. Property that gem. You are right back to you, or harm another person. When property is mortgaged to slip away.
Section 743 if the transferee has made the mortgage assets or depreciation due to the action. Of their negligence. As a result, creditors have the right mortgage or preferential rights over the property. It must be soon. That the transferee is liable for the damage. However, the transferee will take any amount of money which he has left. Or to reimburse their costs and improve the property. You know what I might call. The proliferation of such property unless the price up. It is known only to the extent of proliferation on the auction price only.
Supreme Court in 5484/2549.
To be sued again by Civil Procedure Code Section 148 must be the case that the court has sentenced a final order by any of the issues. Any reason then. The same pair was indicted in the demolition issue. Based on the same grounds that it did not. Red Bank, 9861/2544, but for a number of civil court cases, the plaintiff sued to enforce loan repayment, plus interest and forced Sun to Wed fails to pay the mortgage principal and interest to the plaintiff. The defendant is a buyer from the auction of the mortgaged property in a civil case number 11353/2534 red on Wed Aug creditors under the court's ruling to the mortgaged property to repay the money even if the defendant is a buyer for Sat. mortgaged property. But it is not a party defendant in a civil case No. 9861/2544, the plaintiff sued the Red Bank, May, and the defendant has the right to redeem mortgaged under Section 736 on the defendant and the plaintiff is not paying off your mortgage notice. the mortgage to the defendant under section 735, but the defendant ignored the plaintiff's right to dispute the defendant after the plaintiff's lawsuit. Red Bank, Civil No. 9861/2544 of the Court of First Instance. The case that the plaintiff sued the defendant in this case is different with the Red Bank, civil case No. 9861/2544 of the Court. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit can not be sued again.
Supreme Court in 1115/2549.
The defendant purchased the mortgaged property from the auction of the primary plaintiff in the case of a mortgage holder has the right to expropriate property in question is old, but find Make the defendant liable to the plaintiff as a mortgage, but it does not. As the defendant is a transferee of property mortgages. The rights and obligations as provided in Civil and Commercial Code a defendant is entitled to redeem the mortgage by offering money for a reasonable price. Assets. If the plaintiff is not acceptable. The plaintiff must be filed with the court within one month from the date of the tender offer. The court ordered auction of the mortgaged property. Accordance with the provisions of Section 738 and 739, and if the defendant did not exercise the redemption of mortgage offers. If the plaintiff is the mortgagee. I have a letter of notice to the defendant one month in advance and then mortgaged under Section 735 to require that when a defendant is not a mortgage to buy property adjacent to the plaintiff's rights. The verdict is due in Case No. 20768/2535, the plaintiff sued the red to the property the debtor to court immediately. Defendants are not parties to the case. Aspects of the case is different as well. When looking for a successor shall be deemed to be the party demanding the demolition. Against each other on issues such as diagnosed by the same. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit is filed is not unique to the District Court Case No. 20768/2535 red. Civil Procedure Code not prohibited by Section 148.
Supreme Court in 3419/2534.
The end of the mortgage contract is terminated as provided in 6 cases. Section 744 describes the plaintiff sued the defendant has made a written request for redemption of the mortgage to the defendant. The defendant did not accept the offer until the expiration of one month, defendant filed a petition with the court to auction the mortgaged property. The defendant did not prosecute. It is considered that the proposed redemption of the defendant to the plaintiff by default under a mortgage of 739,741 but the mortgage will then be extinguished by reason of redemption was upon the plaintiff to the defendant the money. Amount equal to the plaintiff for the amount plus interest, or mortgaged. The plaintiff has the money to put their assets at the office put it. The plaintiffs have not sued the state over such charges that are considered significant. This does not cause the plaintiff's complaint, which will be considered if any of the mortgage contract. Lapsed as permitted by applicable laws. The plaintiff has no right to force the defendant to suspend registration of a mortgage.
Supreme Court in 2692/2526.
Although the Civil and Commercial Law Section 736 737 to the assignee of the mortgage to redeem the mortgaged property. The provision of such material is legal in most states. No law relating to the court. And there are no provisions to be used in court and the verdict is. The defendant's duty to redeem the mortgage before it is transferred to the dispute. The plaintiff's mortgage. The duty of the plaintiff's right to redeem the mortgage, not when the defendant willfully failed to comply with the verdict and Cmbagcab issued to enforce against the defendant. It held that the absence of any other creditors to enforce the verdict will be. Enforceable under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 297 (2) the court has the power to detain defendant.
Supreme Court in 1251/2510.
Defendant to the plaintiff's land. The sale to the petitioner, and not redeemed the property. We went to the petitioner by the mortgage to the plaintiff is entitled to notice. I have the intention to enforce his mortgage to the assignee of the mortgaged property. Of the accused under section 736, 737 on the plaintiff can not sue for the mortgage to the petitioner. She has not a judgment debtor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff does not dispute the right to hold the mortgage to the plaintiff. Because she is an outsider.
The plaintiff is the mortgagee. The right to receive payment of the mortgage assets before ordinary creditor. Hotel guests will have to consider that the ownership of the property was transferred to the third party. Or not in accordance with Section 702 (2).
