Section 483 trading counterparties to agree that the seller is not liable for defects or to pay the right time.
Section 484 agreements will not be liable for it. The seller will not be refunded from the price. Unless stated otherwise.
Section 485 agreements will not be liable for it. Not worth the liability of the seller of the seller's own actions. Or the actual text of the vendors already know, and conceal it.
Supreme Court in 1537/2525.
The court ordered the defendant company was liquidated. The defendant has sold all assets to pay debt service. The buyer's bid. The plaintiff purchased from defendant's room. And pay for it. The defendant issued a receipt to the plaintiff. After receipt noted that 'cracking the refund, such as sales calls with the conditions responsible for the defect. Only to break or crack only Does not include skin abrasions or rust color. The bath has a scratch and rust. No cracks. The plaintiff has no claim to the defendant to refund the price or damages. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 shall not apply in this case can not
Supreme Court in 2331/2516.
Of defendants who sold the land and row. Will be registered in order to complete the transaction. Result in ownership of the assets transferred to the plaintiff buyer. The defendant also has an obligation to deliver such property to the plaintiff. The one action that will result in the property to the hands of Plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 461 and 462 as well but find it listed, then it is transferred to the transferee has been covered. His property was not delivered to another.
When there is interference, contrary to appear before it is transferred to it shall be the duty of The seller must clear the defendant shall be exhausted before force is transferred to the plaintiff, and that any such interference does not exist yet. The defendant is not registered ownership in property sales to the plaintiff. The defendant denied any duty to deliver it. The plaintiff shall have the right to not accept the transfer. And the defendant is at fault contracts.
The defendants have agreed in advance in the contract that the amount of money as damages. In the event of their breach of contract. Constitutes the amount of monetary damages as a penalty. When the defendant fails to pay to the plaintiff as scheduled. The plaintiff shall have the right to remove a defendant under the terms of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 379 and 381 by the plaintiff need not serve as proof of damages.
Supreme Court in 2292/2515.
The plaintiff purchased the car in good faith of the defendant, a merchant supplier of that type. The police have seized a car from the plaintiff in criminal cases. The Criminal Court sentenced the victim to return the vehicle to the owner of the real. Even under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1332 plaintiff need not have traded cars back to the true owner unless The owner will pay the purchase price, but the purpose of the plaintiff in the car it was so. The car is owned. I need to pay for night. Civil and Commercial Code and Article 475 stipulates that the buyer was not in good faith under section 1332 property, not in a position to be so right, Ron. When the owner of the real disturbing the plaintiff against the plaintiff and the buyer must return the car. To follow the ruling of the court that the plaintiff will receive compensation for the acquired or owned. To pay the price or not. I have to assume that the plaintiff was entitled to pay the seller liable for the consequences of the defendant.
The plaintiff must allow police to seize vehicles and was sentenced to a criminal court. Go back to the true owner. Car sales have dropped to the plaintiff buyer. The seller is liable to pay the defendant returned the car the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 479, and damages to the plaintiff under Section 475 (decision by the Conference of 26/2515).
Section 484 agreements will not be liable for it. The seller will not be refunded from the price. Unless stated otherwise.
Section 485 agreements will not be liable for it. Not worth the liability of the seller of the seller's own actions. Or the actual text of the vendors already know, and conceal it.
Supreme Court in 1537/2525.
The court ordered the defendant company was liquidated. The defendant has sold all assets to pay debt service. The buyer's bid. The plaintiff purchased from defendant's room. And pay for it. The defendant issued a receipt to the plaintiff. After receipt noted that 'cracking the refund, such as sales calls with the conditions responsible for the defect. Only to break or crack only Does not include skin abrasions or rust color. The bath has a scratch and rust. No cracks. The plaintiff has no claim to the defendant to refund the price or damages. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 472 shall not apply in this case can not
Supreme Court in 2331/2516.
Of defendants who sold the land and row. Will be registered in order to complete the transaction. Result in ownership of the assets transferred to the plaintiff buyer. The defendant also has an obligation to deliver such property to the plaintiff. The one action that will result in the property to the hands of Plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 461 and 462 as well but find it listed, then it is transferred to the transferee has been covered. His property was not delivered to another.
When there is interference, contrary to appear before it is transferred to it shall be the duty of The seller must clear the defendant shall be exhausted before force is transferred to the plaintiff, and that any such interference does not exist yet. The defendant is not registered ownership in property sales to the plaintiff. The defendant denied any duty to deliver it. The plaintiff shall have the right to not accept the transfer. And the defendant is at fault contracts.
The defendants have agreed in advance in the contract that the amount of money as damages. In the event of their breach of contract. Constitutes the amount of monetary damages as a penalty. When the defendant fails to pay to the plaintiff as scheduled. The plaintiff shall have the right to remove a defendant under the terms of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 379 and 381 by the plaintiff need not serve as proof of damages.
Supreme Court in 2292/2515.
The plaintiff purchased the car in good faith of the defendant, a merchant supplier of that type. The police have seized a car from the plaintiff in criminal cases. The Criminal Court sentenced the victim to return the vehicle to the owner of the real. Even under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1332 plaintiff need not have traded cars back to the true owner unless The owner will pay the purchase price, but the purpose of the plaintiff in the car it was so. The car is owned. I need to pay for night. Civil and Commercial Code and Article 475 stipulates that the buyer was not in good faith under section 1332 property, not in a position to be so right, Ron. When the owner of the real disturbing the plaintiff against the plaintiff and the buyer must return the car. To follow the ruling of the court that the plaintiff will receive compensation for the acquired or owned. To pay the price or not. I have to assume that the plaintiff was entitled to pay the seller liable for the consequences of the defendant.
The plaintiff must allow police to seize vehicles and was sentenced to a criminal court. Go back to the true owner. Car sales have dropped to the plaintiff buyer. The seller is liable to pay the defendant returned the car the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 479, and damages to the plaintiff under Section 475 (decision by the Conference of 26/2515).
