Section 657 of the deposit agreement, the property is a person. The depositor. Delivery of property to another person. Is called the depositary. And the depositary agree to keep such property in its custody and will be refunded.
Section 658 if the circumstances should be expected that they get their reward was to be the only property I know that You shall be deemed to have tacitly agreed that there is a reward like that.
Section 659 if it does not get any reward as a gem. You must take care that the depositary all property which is deposited as ever behave in their own businesses.
If you get a reward for their deposits. The depositary will need to use caution and skill to preserve the property that will act as Reply Post Reply with circumstances like that. This would include the use of a special skill in a craft that will be used so.
If the deposit is a professional and specialized trade or vocation, but one must use caution and skill as a simple to use and should be used in a trade or vocational activities like that.
Section 660 if the deposit is not allowed. I took the deposit and the property it is utilized. Or to a third party utility. Or external storage gem. You that the depositary will be liable on account of the loss or damage to property which one. It is because of force majeure. Anyway, unless it is proved that any loss or damage to property that would be enough.
Section 661 If a person claiming to be entitled to claim on the assets and deposits and deposits from the recipient. Or seizure of property is good. Depositary must notify its depositors at once.
Section 662 if the timing is that property which will return the deposit when The depositary will not be entitled to recover the property prior to the scheduled time. Unless compelled to violate it may be.
Section 663 although the parties are scheduled to leave the property at night, whenever. If the deposit is refundable at any time the deposit will be refunded.
Section 664 If the parties are not scheduled to leave the property at night, when gem. Gift recipients may return such property at any time.
Section 665 the depositary must return the property deposited to the depositor. Or deposited in the name of any such property. Refunded to him. Or ordered by the depositary, shall be returned to the property to anyone. Refunded to him.
If the property was deposited. You to return such property to the heirs.
Section 666 on the property. The fruits of the property where the amount deposited. Depositary must deliver the property along with it.
Section 667 of property value, the deposit is refunded. I have to deposit the waste.
Section 668 any reasonable expenses for maintenance of the property deposited. The depositor must pay to the depositary. Unless otherwise agreed by contract that the deposit will have to deposit their money into their own expense.
Section 669 is not scheduled in the contract. Or by depositing the property in question is customary that the pension will be payable when the gem. You pay a deposit on the property. If you set aside time to time, however. Is payable at the end of that period all the time.
Section 670 depositary to withhold the property from which it was deposited. Until those arrears are paid for their property on deposit with it.
Section 671 in the liability for asset retirement costs from deposits. Reimbursement of expenses from. Used to deposit any loss on it. You shall not be filed after the expiration of six months from the end of the contract.
Supreme Court to 10082/2551.
To determine whether the defendant, as depository of the car as a reward for their deposit. Care and skill to preserve the property that Reply Post Reply will behave. The reason so or not. Must be considered with other people in situations like that, I should be careful like. The row in which the defendant is located adjacent to the Road Garage. In front of the garage is located adjacent to the curb. Show that the defendant's garage as a small garage, it is impossible to have a fence or barrier. I was looking to provide care at night. The defendants dispute the car pick-up in front of the defendant's garage was locked. Steering wheel lock car doors and disputes. I had it lying in the garage. When you hear the car engines as they arise, see The Court found that the car is gone. I let the police patrol the past, and trace out the culprit. The police official. Circumstances, such as the defendant had used reasonable care and skill to preserve. Property that Reply Post Reply conduct by any circumstances, so then.
Supreme Court in 8816/2551.
Plaintiff to recover money the defendant. The contract calls for the transfer of money to hire a car loan or lease. Purchaser shall pay to the plaintiff to the defendant as a security for payment. And obligations transferred to the insurance claims have been paid in full, then the defendant must be transferred back to the plaintiff claims. The agreement to transfer the message claims. This Agreement shall come into force until the obligations secured by the plaintiff is liable. All defendants will receive the restitution in full. Of wording in the contract that "Any contract between the assignor. And the transfer is made at any time, "the words" under any other made between the transferor and the transferee, "the party two sides during the transfer of the plaintiff, the assignee of the defendant is likely to contract a loan. that the two sides will have to do more than a management contract, a multi-party agreement. If you want to transfer the claims as collateral for loan under management contract with the transferor and transferee, it is expressly stated that In addition to the loan agreements. Pledged as collateral for the transfer of claims management. If a major management contract is a contract that requires the right to claim the rent. Buy a car as collateral for the contract. It should be specified in the agreement to transfer claims to be. We promise to transfer the claim is secured by a management contract. It is with the provisions of Section 11 of the Civil and Commercial Code. Which states that "In case of doubt. Be interpreted in a way that the party is you who will be in debt to "be on the plaintiff to recover full contractual payments. The defendant claims that the transfer must be transferred to contract back to the plaintiff.
Defendant's bank account. The defendant is a party to deposit with the bank. And shall be entitled to recover the deposit of assets under Section 665 even though the defendant to transfer the rights and interests in deposit accounts. And the right to receive or withdraw money from their account to another.
Supreme Court to 374/2551.
A contract with the defendant that the defendant hired two security inside and outside the building including the parking lot of the three defendants by requiring security against theft. And vehicles of customers or third parties with access to the service center to avoid damage. In practice, defendants will provide a full-time employees at the entrance to the parking lot looking for parking pass and registration number before the ceremony that will bring the car into park. When the car the driver will have to return the parking pass and pay for parking to employees who regularly take to finish before I passed out and was going to be a.. Insured is the plaintiff's car. Insurance parked in the parking lot of the building. And get a parking pass from the staff of Defendant No. 1, but not written into the car, so there is a dispute over a car leaving the parking lot. The parking ticket and proof of vehicle ownership is still with that. Insured. Because the car was. Insured loss caused by the negligence of employees of the defendant, a non-written a number plate as directed in the pass parking lot and did not examine the evidence carefully before being allowed out. to. To ignore their duties under the conditions specified on the back of the card through the parking lot. Can be considered an employee of the defendant's negligence in performing their duties without caution as a result of the new car. Insured loss. Can be considered an employee of the defendant violated the defendant's formal employment so that a defendant is liable in damages to a plaintiff's insurer.
Conditions set forth on the back of the card through the parking lot. The issue is not to get the car company is not responsible for any loss or damage to any car there is a condition that the defendant is a set up to allow the defendant to a termination liability by the defendant at the first set, but the parties. single Not a waiver of liability for infringement of the defendant, an employee of the defendant, a defendant must be combined with 2 and 3, the liability to pay damages to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 2542/2549.
Sued by the plaintiff's claims are based on charges that Plaintiff to the defendant as a deposit. Later, someone forged the signature of the plaintiff to withdraw money from bank accounts of the plaintiff. The defendant acts recklessly allowed to withdraw. The plaintiff has been damaged. The defendant liable to pay the amount to be withdrawn together with interest to the plaintiff. Plaint of the plaintiff in such a manner that the deposit is refunded by the defendant. Leave the property. The plaintiff will present his case to the negligence of the defendant to show that The defendant will be liable to the plaintiff because they do not act according to Section 659, paragraph three states only. Find the right to sue for the violation of which is the first year that the defendants did not petition. Claims for refund of the deposit agreement, the property is not law. Age specific. The age of 10 years under the Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 1936/2549.
The defendant and two parking places for customers. The car park is to find the car keys and the car itself. Employees of the defendant and a parking pass to the incoming Care provision for parking. Parking pass and returned it out to help provide security for customers entering the car park. No parking fee. The customer car park into the possession of the car without giving effect to both defendants. The property is not deposited in accordance with Section 657 the plaintiff has no right to take legal action against a breach of their deposits.
Defendant's parking pass at the two employees of the defendant's first distributed to customers on a car parked in the car park is substantial evidence to show that the car of the customer. Which was parked in the parking lot could be lost due to an employee of the defendant to leave the car without a parking pass and returned checks. Or car parking pass for your negligence in causing the villain to steal a car parking ticket at the employees of the defendant to show that one out, then go for it. Or even a car owner came to us with a parking pass for the lead villain is out to get the card free of the second defendant to remain in the possession of the car. When it appears that the claimant is the defendant's parking pass at the 2, the parking pass to the plaintiff. The car owner, but employees of the defendants dispute that a negligence case to leave the car without the parking pass. I heard that the defendant did not act recklessly causing both vehicles lost to disputes.
Supreme Court in 8144/2548.
The plaintiff, the University's bank account with the defendant that a condition for disbursement from the account that I have to be signed by the plaintiff to sign a joint statement to be paid from the account. It shows in the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant a deposit of property, the plaintiffs equate the terms of withdrawal as specified in the request to open a. Essence, a condition that causes the plaintiff depositors confidence that if the plaintiff Not co-sign the withdrawal slip with No one will be able to withdraw from the account so you will have to change the terms of withdrawal, as if this is something else. Would be considered a material change in the importance of the contract. Savings deposits between the plaintiff and a defendant is to be changed to such conditions would have liked to plaintiff is the plaintiff and I have to appear for the defendant's presence at a manual or power of attorney as well. seriously The first defendant that the plaintiff is a major customer, and I relaxed and allowed to practice without the need forTo follow the normal practice. The defendant did not take precautions as far as a simple to use and should be in the business. Their banks. Upon written request signed by the plaintiff in the conditions of disbursement of the deposit. A fake signature. Employees of the defendant a check and forging the signatures do not know if this is approved I can change the conditions for withdrawal. This must be regarded as a depository, the bank defendants have not made as much as it must be used. Bank of the children in this one.
The plaintiff, with m 1 and m open to the defendant filed a written request for a change for the disbursement of funds from the account. And when I withdraw from the joint account to be the sole claimant to the University as man and wife. Assets between husband and wife shall be in accordance with Section 1470 property if the property is suspected to be either a property or not in accordance with Section 1474 shall be presumed that the marriage law. With the money in the account of the plaintiff alone. I have no reason to require that the plaintiff's withdrawal was paid to sign the two together. So that the money in a savings account that I draw to the property. The plaintiff has only one half of the defendants liable for the damage of the plaintiff in this section.
Supreme Court in 9190/2547.
When the defendant is the owner of the port and shipping services from the plaintiff's ship was unloading the car all The boat is finished. The plaintiff did not get the car immediately. However, the defendant maintained that the Court order the defendants are charged with preserving. I have a contract with the pension assets are also included. If the car has been damaged. The defendant shall be liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff's deposit account. The lawsuit also claims the repair of the lawsuit. Compensation for their deposits. The age of 6 months from the end of the contract under Section 671 the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 14, 2539, thus exceeding 6 months from the date of November 27, 2538, the date of the plaintiff's car. Returns to the defendant as a deposit at the end of their contract. Claims by the plaintiff for the defendant to terminate the complaint.
Supreme Court in 9190/2547.
When the defendant is the owner of the port and shipping services from the plaintiff's ship was unloading the car all The boat is finished. The plaintiff did not get the car immediately. However, the defendant maintained that the Court order the defendants are charged with preserving. I have a contract with the pension assets are also included. If the car has been damaged. The defendant shall be liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff's deposit account. The lawsuit also claims the repair of the lawsuit. Compensation for their deposits. The age of 6 months from the end of the contract under Section 671 the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 14, 2539, thus exceeding 6 months from the date of November 27, 2538, the date of the plaintiff's car. Returns to the defendant as a deposit at the end of their contract. Claims by the plaintiff for the defendant to terminate the complaint.
Supreme Court in 4712/2546.
The plaintiff sued five defendants liable as a depository of container products has already been lost during the five defendants to sue to get the price of property. The claim is not about to leave the property. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 671 and the case law is not age specific. Must be under age 10 years and 193/30 on the carrier to deliver goods to the consignee on December 15, 2541, the same day that the consignee that the goods be lost. From that date until the filing date of December 9, 2542 to end 10 years with the plaintiff sued the defendant did not terminate the fifth.
Supreme Court to 880/2546.
The plaintiff opened a savings to the defendant at first by depositing an amount deposited with the defendant at the second, a nephew and an employee of the defendant at a later accused the two forged signatures of the plaintiff in the bank and put money in savings. property of the plaintiff, the 21 employees of the defendant, a payment to the defendant, two of which are employed to work together without conscious attention to the signature of the withdrawal as a sign that not all the signatures of the plaintiff in Unlike the plaintiff signed a withdrawal slip in the specimen signature given by the explicit In cases where the plaintiff is the payee to sign a withdrawal slip, but none of the plaintiff's. Employees of the defendant at a still pay money to the defendant to 2 to represent circumstances indicate that the employees of the defendant to a gross negligence in paying money to the defendants, two are employees of the defendant at a resolution carefully and. Due care professionals are aware that the bank would withdraw the signature of the plaintiff in a false signature. The plaintiff's account passbook for the defendant to two of the plaintiffs made in good faith because they believe the defendant No. 2 is the nephew of the defendant's second withdrawal from the account of the plaintiff to be caused by the negligence of their employees. Defendant 1 is not a direct result of the plaintiff's account passbook for the defendant to two actions, the plaintiff also is not that the plaintiff has negligently acting in violation of the defendant, the second with the defendant at first had to work with. The second defendant liable to plaintiff in full.
Supreme Court in 4235/2541.
Deposited with the plaintiff and the defendant's car. Defendants charged a monthly deposit. There are regulations that require vehicle owners to deposit keys with the defendant, the defendant in the case of a moving car to another car park. The plaintiff gave the defendant every time the car park of the circumstances. Property with a deposit bonus. Looking for a rental. Parking places are not.
Supreme Court in 1795/2541.
whether or not the defendant had used reasonable care and expertise are in any way. The defendant paid the plaintiff, or direct debit, so that others can be considered as negligence of the defendant. While the current account of the plaintiff, the plaintiff was not aware that the fake signature of plaintiff's settlement check made payable to cash or to charge the defendant. The plaintiff had paid the debt after the defendants have been completed. The plaintiff went to check out. That have led to charges from the defendant became aware that the defendant forged the signatures on the settlement check. The defendant admits the debt reserve funds overdrafts.
Section 658 if the circumstances should be expected that they get their reward was to be the only property I know that You shall be deemed to have tacitly agreed that there is a reward like that.
Section 659 if it does not get any reward as a gem. You must take care that the depositary all property which is deposited as ever behave in their own businesses.
If you get a reward for their deposits. The depositary will need to use caution and skill to preserve the property that will act as Reply Post Reply with circumstances like that. This would include the use of a special skill in a craft that will be used so.
If the deposit is a professional and specialized trade or vocation, but one must use caution and skill as a simple to use and should be used in a trade or vocational activities like that.
Section 660 if the deposit is not allowed. I took the deposit and the property it is utilized. Or to a third party utility. Or external storage gem. You that the depositary will be liable on account of the loss or damage to property which one. It is because of force majeure. Anyway, unless it is proved that any loss or damage to property that would be enough.
Section 661 If a person claiming to be entitled to claim on the assets and deposits and deposits from the recipient. Or seizure of property is good. Depositary must notify its depositors at once.
Section 662 if the timing is that property which will return the deposit when The depositary will not be entitled to recover the property prior to the scheduled time. Unless compelled to violate it may be.
Section 663 although the parties are scheduled to leave the property at night, whenever. If the deposit is refundable at any time the deposit will be refunded.
Section 664 If the parties are not scheduled to leave the property at night, when gem. Gift recipients may return such property at any time.
Section 665 the depositary must return the property deposited to the depositor. Or deposited in the name of any such property. Refunded to him. Or ordered by the depositary, shall be returned to the property to anyone. Refunded to him.
If the property was deposited. You to return such property to the heirs.
Section 666 on the property. The fruits of the property where the amount deposited. Depositary must deliver the property along with it.
Section 667 of property value, the deposit is refunded. I have to deposit the waste.
Section 668 any reasonable expenses for maintenance of the property deposited. The depositor must pay to the depositary. Unless otherwise agreed by contract that the deposit will have to deposit their money into their own expense.
Section 669 is not scheduled in the contract. Or by depositing the property in question is customary that the pension will be payable when the gem. You pay a deposit on the property. If you set aside time to time, however. Is payable at the end of that period all the time.
Section 670 depositary to withhold the property from which it was deposited. Until those arrears are paid for their property on deposit with it.
Section 671 in the liability for asset retirement costs from deposits. Reimbursement of expenses from. Used to deposit any loss on it. You shall not be filed after the expiration of six months from the end of the contract.
Supreme Court to 10082/2551.
To determine whether the defendant, as depository of the car as a reward for their deposit. Care and skill to preserve the property that Reply Post Reply will behave. The reason so or not. Must be considered with other people in situations like that, I should be careful like. The row in which the defendant is located adjacent to the Road Garage. In front of the garage is located adjacent to the curb. Show that the defendant's garage as a small garage, it is impossible to have a fence or barrier. I was looking to provide care at night. The defendants dispute the car pick-up in front of the defendant's garage was locked. Steering wheel lock car doors and disputes. I had it lying in the garage. When you hear the car engines as they arise, see The Court found that the car is gone. I let the police patrol the past, and trace out the culprit. The police official. Circumstances, such as the defendant had used reasonable care and skill to preserve. Property that Reply Post Reply conduct by any circumstances, so then.
Supreme Court in 8816/2551.
Plaintiff to recover money the defendant. The contract calls for the transfer of money to hire a car loan or lease. Purchaser shall pay to the plaintiff to the defendant as a security for payment. And obligations transferred to the insurance claims have been paid in full, then the defendant must be transferred back to the plaintiff claims. The agreement to transfer the message claims. This Agreement shall come into force until the obligations secured by the plaintiff is liable. All defendants will receive the restitution in full. Of wording in the contract that "Any contract between the assignor. And the transfer is made at any time, "the words" under any other made between the transferor and the transferee, "the party two sides during the transfer of the plaintiff, the assignee of the defendant is likely to contract a loan. that the two sides will have to do more than a management contract, a multi-party agreement. If you want to transfer the claims as collateral for loan under management contract with the transferor and transferee, it is expressly stated that In addition to the loan agreements. Pledged as collateral for the transfer of claims management. If a major management contract is a contract that requires the right to claim the rent. Buy a car as collateral for the contract. It should be specified in the agreement to transfer claims to be. We promise to transfer the claim is secured by a management contract. It is with the provisions of Section 11 of the Civil and Commercial Code. Which states that "In case of doubt. Be interpreted in a way that the party is you who will be in debt to "be on the plaintiff to recover full contractual payments. The defendant claims that the transfer must be transferred to contract back to the plaintiff.
Defendant's bank account. The defendant is a party to deposit with the bank. And shall be entitled to recover the deposit of assets under Section 665 even though the defendant to transfer the rights and interests in deposit accounts. And the right to receive or withdraw money from their account to another.
Supreme Court to 374/2551.
A contract with the defendant that the defendant hired two security inside and outside the building including the parking lot of the three defendants by requiring security against theft. And vehicles of customers or third parties with access to the service center to avoid damage. In practice, defendants will provide a full-time employees at the entrance to the parking lot looking for parking pass and registration number before the ceremony that will bring the car into park. When the car the driver will have to return the parking pass and pay for parking to employees who regularly take to finish before I passed out and was going to be a.. Insured is the plaintiff's car. Insurance parked in the parking lot of the building. And get a parking pass from the staff of Defendant No. 1, but not written into the car, so there is a dispute over a car leaving the parking lot. The parking ticket and proof of vehicle ownership is still with that. Insured. Because the car was. Insured loss caused by the negligence of employees of the defendant, a non-written a number plate as directed in the pass parking lot and did not examine the evidence carefully before being allowed out. to. To ignore their duties under the conditions specified on the back of the card through the parking lot. Can be considered an employee of the defendant's negligence in performing their duties without caution as a result of the new car. Insured loss. Can be considered an employee of the defendant violated the defendant's formal employment so that a defendant is liable in damages to a plaintiff's insurer.
Conditions set forth on the back of the card through the parking lot. The issue is not to get the car company is not responsible for any loss or damage to any car there is a condition that the defendant is a set up to allow the defendant to a termination liability by the defendant at the first set, but the parties. single Not a waiver of liability for infringement of the defendant, an employee of the defendant, a defendant must be combined with 2 and 3, the liability to pay damages to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 2542/2549.
Sued by the plaintiff's claims are based on charges that Plaintiff to the defendant as a deposit. Later, someone forged the signature of the plaintiff to withdraw money from bank accounts of the plaintiff. The defendant acts recklessly allowed to withdraw. The plaintiff has been damaged. The defendant liable to pay the amount to be withdrawn together with interest to the plaintiff. Plaint of the plaintiff in such a manner that the deposit is refunded by the defendant. Leave the property. The plaintiff will present his case to the negligence of the defendant to show that The defendant will be liable to the plaintiff because they do not act according to Section 659, paragraph three states only. Find the right to sue for the violation of which is the first year that the defendants did not petition. Claims for refund of the deposit agreement, the property is not law. Age specific. The age of 10 years under the Section 193/30.
Supreme Court in 1936/2549.
The defendant and two parking places for customers. The car park is to find the car keys and the car itself. Employees of the defendant and a parking pass to the incoming Care provision for parking. Parking pass and returned it out to help provide security for customers entering the car park. No parking fee. The customer car park into the possession of the car without giving effect to both defendants. The property is not deposited in accordance with Section 657 the plaintiff has no right to take legal action against a breach of their deposits.
Defendant's parking pass at the two employees of the defendant's first distributed to customers on a car parked in the car park is substantial evidence to show that the car of the customer. Which was parked in the parking lot could be lost due to an employee of the defendant to leave the car without a parking pass and returned checks. Or car parking pass for your negligence in causing the villain to steal a car parking ticket at the employees of the defendant to show that one out, then go for it. Or even a car owner came to us with a parking pass for the lead villain is out to get the card free of the second defendant to remain in the possession of the car. When it appears that the claimant is the defendant's parking pass at the 2, the parking pass to the plaintiff. The car owner, but employees of the defendants dispute that a negligence case to leave the car without the parking pass. I heard that the defendant did not act recklessly causing both vehicles lost to disputes.
Supreme Court in 8144/2548.
The plaintiff, the University's bank account with the defendant that a condition for disbursement from the account that I have to be signed by the plaintiff to sign a joint statement to be paid from the account. It shows in the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant a deposit of property, the plaintiffs equate the terms of withdrawal as specified in the request to open a. Essence, a condition that causes the plaintiff depositors confidence that if the plaintiff Not co-sign the withdrawal slip with No one will be able to withdraw from the account so you will have to change the terms of withdrawal, as if this is something else. Would be considered a material change in the importance of the contract. Savings deposits between the plaintiff and a defendant is to be changed to such conditions would have liked to plaintiff is the plaintiff and I have to appear for the defendant's presence at a manual or power of attorney as well. seriously The first defendant that the plaintiff is a major customer, and I relaxed and allowed to practice without the need forTo follow the normal practice. The defendant did not take precautions as far as a simple to use and should be in the business. Their banks. Upon written request signed by the plaintiff in the conditions of disbursement of the deposit. A fake signature. Employees of the defendant a check and forging the signatures do not know if this is approved I can change the conditions for withdrawal. This must be regarded as a depository, the bank defendants have not made as much as it must be used. Bank of the children in this one.
The plaintiff, with m 1 and m open to the defendant filed a written request for a change for the disbursement of funds from the account. And when I withdraw from the joint account to be the sole claimant to the University as man and wife. Assets between husband and wife shall be in accordance with Section 1470 property if the property is suspected to be either a property or not in accordance with Section 1474 shall be presumed that the marriage law. With the money in the account of the plaintiff alone. I have no reason to require that the plaintiff's withdrawal was paid to sign the two together. So that the money in a savings account that I draw to the property. The plaintiff has only one half of the defendants liable for the damage of the plaintiff in this section.
Supreme Court in 9190/2547.
When the defendant is the owner of the port and shipping services from the plaintiff's ship was unloading the car all The boat is finished. The plaintiff did not get the car immediately. However, the defendant maintained that the Court order the defendants are charged with preserving. I have a contract with the pension assets are also included. If the car has been damaged. The defendant shall be liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff's deposit account. The lawsuit also claims the repair of the lawsuit. Compensation for their deposits. The age of 6 months from the end of the contract under Section 671 the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 14, 2539, thus exceeding 6 months from the date of November 27, 2538, the date of the plaintiff's car. Returns to the defendant as a deposit at the end of their contract. Claims by the plaintiff for the defendant to terminate the complaint.
Supreme Court in 9190/2547.
When the defendant is the owner of the port and shipping services from the plaintiff's ship was unloading the car all The boat is finished. The plaintiff did not get the car immediately. However, the defendant maintained that the Court order the defendants are charged with preserving. I have a contract with the pension assets are also included. If the car has been damaged. The defendant shall be liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff's deposit account. The lawsuit also claims the repair of the lawsuit. Compensation for their deposits. The age of 6 months from the end of the contract under Section 671 the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 14, 2539, thus exceeding 6 months from the date of November 27, 2538, the date of the plaintiff's car. Returns to the defendant as a deposit at the end of their contract. Claims by the plaintiff for the defendant to terminate the complaint.
Supreme Court in 4712/2546.
The plaintiff sued five defendants liable as a depository of container products has already been lost during the five defendants to sue to get the price of property. The claim is not about to leave the property. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 671 and the case law is not age specific. Must be under age 10 years and 193/30 on the carrier to deliver goods to the consignee on December 15, 2541, the same day that the consignee that the goods be lost. From that date until the filing date of December 9, 2542 to end 10 years with the plaintiff sued the defendant did not terminate the fifth.
Supreme Court to 880/2546.
The plaintiff opened a savings to the defendant at first by depositing an amount deposited with the defendant at the second, a nephew and an employee of the defendant at a later accused the two forged signatures of the plaintiff in the bank and put money in savings. property of the plaintiff, the 21 employees of the defendant, a payment to the defendant, two of which are employed to work together without conscious attention to the signature of the withdrawal as a sign that not all the signatures of the plaintiff in Unlike the plaintiff signed a withdrawal slip in the specimen signature given by the explicit In cases where the plaintiff is the payee to sign a withdrawal slip, but none of the plaintiff's. Employees of the defendant at a still pay money to the defendant to 2 to represent circumstances indicate that the employees of the defendant to a gross negligence in paying money to the defendants, two are employees of the defendant at a resolution carefully and. Due care professionals are aware that the bank would withdraw the signature of the plaintiff in a false signature. The plaintiff's account passbook for the defendant to two of the plaintiffs made in good faith because they believe the defendant No. 2 is the nephew of the defendant's second withdrawal from the account of the plaintiff to be caused by the negligence of their employees. Defendant 1 is not a direct result of the plaintiff's account passbook for the defendant to two actions, the plaintiff also is not that the plaintiff has negligently acting in violation of the defendant, the second with the defendant at first had to work with. The second defendant liable to plaintiff in full.
Supreme Court in 4235/2541.
Deposited with the plaintiff and the defendant's car. Defendants charged a monthly deposit. There are regulations that require vehicle owners to deposit keys with the defendant, the defendant in the case of a moving car to another car park. The plaintiff gave the defendant every time the car park of the circumstances. Property with a deposit bonus. Looking for a rental. Parking places are not.
Supreme Court in 1795/2541.
whether or not the defendant had used reasonable care and expertise are in any way. The defendant paid the plaintiff, or direct debit, so that others can be considered as negligence of the defendant. While the current account of the plaintiff, the plaintiff was not aware that the fake signature of plaintiff's settlement check made payable to cash or to charge the defendant. The plaintiff had paid the debt after the defendants have been completed. The plaintiff went to check out. That have led to charges from the defendant became aware that the defendant forged the signatures on the settlement check. The defendant admits the debt reserve funds overdrafts.
