Section 552 of the lessee to use the leased property other than those used for conventional normal Or as provided in the contract. You do not find it.
Section 553 tenants have to reserve a rental property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. And require little maintenance and repairs as well.
Section 554 if the tenant violates the provisions of Section 552 or Section 553 violates the agreement. Notice to the lessor to the lessee shall be required by law or contract and the lessee can not ignore the non-compliance. He said the lessor to terminate the contract was broken.
Section 555 tenant must allow the landlord or agent of the landlord to inspect the leased property from time to time. In a reasonable time and distance.
Section 556 if the period of lease is a rental property which needs to be repaired, it is urgent And the lessor would be necessary to repair such a gem. That the tenant will not let you do that do not. Even if it is an inconvenience to her. If the repair is a condition which is unreasonably long. It is why the property is not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Tenants will pay a termination.
Section 557 in any case, as the following.
(1) If the leased property is damaged, should the landlord have to repair it.
(2) If you need to manage one of the dangers of such property to parry it.
(3) If a third party intrusion into the leased property or private property is the right one above it.
In such case the tenant to notify the landlord immediately. Unless the lessor is aware that it is already.
If the tenant fails to comply with the provisions of this neglected gem. That the lessee will be liable to the lessor when the lessor should be any delay because of the neglect of the lease.
Section 558 of the leased property. If the landlord's permission first. Tenants will be modified or added one can not. If the lessee and made possible by the permission of the lessor, such as the gem. When the landlord claims the tenant must give the property back to its original condition and will be liable to the lessor for loss or damage caused by any modification, but annex it.
Section 559 is not required by contract or by custom, that will pay rent at any time, you pay at the end of the period, which has agreed to set aside every now and then. That is, if an annual rental fee is payable at the end of the year. If a monthly rental fee is payable at the end of the month.
Section 560 if the tenant fails to pay the rent. The lessor may terminate the contract time.
However, if the rent was to be sent on a monthly basis. Or for a period longer than a month or more. The lessor must notify the tenant that the rent shall be paid within no time. Which shall be not less than fifteen days.
Section 561 is not made in writing and signed by the parties stated that the property is leased to state how You shall be presumed that the tenant has leased the property to good condition and repair. The contract has been terminated or terminated. Lessee must return the property in such condition. Unless they can prove that the property is not repaired in time for delivery.
Article 562 The lessee shall be liable for any loss or damage. It happened to the leased property. It's the fault of the tenant. Or persons who are tenants. Or of the sublease.
The tenant shall not be liable for loss or damage arising from the use of such property.
Section 563 cases, the lessor can sue the tenant on the lease, you shall not be filed after the expiration of six months from the return of the leased property.
Supreme Court in 6179/2551.
The plaintiff is entitled to lease state's Division of the Department of Treasury, Ministry of Finance. Building, commercial building, No. 231 the plaintiff sued to expel the defendant from the property valuable for the filing month, 2,000 a plaintiff may claim damages from the date of termination of the contract month, 10,000 are reimbursed as part of a lawsuit against the driver. chase. It must appeal to the facts Civil Code Procedure Section 224 paragraph one and paragraph two. The defendant appealed that The plaintiff did not intend to sublease the leasehold. An appeal on the issue of facts to lead to legislation that Sublease agreement is a legal right to secretly transfer the lease or not. The defendant appealed on this point by the judges who sit in the trial court did not. That there are reasonable grounds to appeal the violation of the provisions of that law.
The sub-floor building, the agreement is a contract that the duration of the contract must comply with Section 566 of the sublease agreement is the agreement to pay 2,000 baht a month's rent. the payment of rent, of course. It takes a month to pay rent under the Section 559 plaintiff and the defendant in writing to terminate the sublease agreement was received on August 4, 2537 plaintiff filed a lawsuit on March 21, 2538 termination. sublease was like then.
Supreme Court in 6159/2551.
When rental property is a standard factory and after the plaintiff has been damaged, the entire contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is terminated in accordance with Section 567 on the leased property is lost or damaged completely. It is not possible to return the leased property to the plaintiff's case is not in force must be filed within 6 months from the date the defendant to return the leased property in accordance with Section 563, describes the plaintiff's complaint. that the defendant's actions. As a result, the plant violated the standards of both the plaintiff has been damaged after the fire, the plaintiff must sue for compensation may be used within one year from the date the plaintiff knew about the abuse and may be used for compensation. When it appears that Commission of Inquiry to find them liable in civil proceedings that the plaintiff had been appointed. Report its findings to inform them of liability in a civil governor of the plaintiff says. Does not appear that anyone involved in the fire and will be liable in a civil, but that the defendant tenant's breach of contract and causing damage to the leased property the defendant must compensate the plaintiff described to sue. that the defendant has. Duties under the contract must be delivered from the factory standard for the plaintiff in the Night. When you do not have to pay compensation. This case has no provisions for a particular age. It requires a 10-year-old general.
The standard factory fire the plaintiff. When the defendant's possession of a dangerous power over the property by the defendant do not care conditions to cause a fire. Defendant is liable. Unless the defendant can prove that the damage was not unexpected. Was not unexpected, nor was it the fault of the plaintiff, who is the victim. The defendant has not denied liability.
Supreme Court in 4526/2550.
Section 563 refers to a lawsuit if the tenant breached the duty of the lessee by the provisions of Section 552 to Section 562, however, the plaintiff filed a charge against the defendant owed. and the lack of benefit from the plaintiff, the defendant did not receive the full value of the contract. Civil and Commercial Code or other laws, not provided for by statute. The age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Supreme Court to 408/2550.
The Supreme Court ruled that the defendant and the plaintiff's settlement with the family out of the building. The two co-defendants for the plaintiff in building such a good condition and repair the damage done to the plaintiff until after delivery. A. The lease agreement that disputes some of the accused and the family of T. The two defendants and held that the defendant s case has occupied the building along both held that the defendant did not have both. The building was completed the dispute to the plaintiff s case was in the building and room keys to the plaintiff before the Court. It held that the defendant delivered to the plaintiff disputes the building is completed on such date. The plaintiff is entitled to damages up to that date.
Supreme Court in 4644/2549.
The hire-purchase agreements to terminate the agreement if the lease fails to pay any lease for one installment on the purchase and possession of a car lease. If sales are not enough to pay the lease, the lease continues to be paid under the contract, including any costs and damages, the total net value of the hire-purchase was paid. The lease agreement will reimburse the amount lost to the owner. The agreement is a hire-purchase agreement, claims for compensation. The legal action against the non-payment of the fee payable. And it's not as if the operators in the leasing of movable property as a rental. So do not fall into the age of 2 years under Section 193/34 (6) and is not a case where the landlord sue the tenant on the lease at the age of 6 months when there is no legal age limit. The specific. The 10-year-old must be under 193/30.
Supreme Court in 3807/2549.
The plaintiff sued the lack of a car lease, then after the contract termination. There is no provision of law, the statute in this particular case. Must be age 10 years when the lease terminated under Section 193/30 of May 30, 2541 the plaintiff filed a lawsuit on September 10, 2544 did not terminate the plaintiff.
Age 6 months, according to Section 563, it is rent property I used to claim the lack of benefit from using the car hire.
Hire-purchase and lease agreements are not at fault, then quit. The lease was forfeited and the defendant paid the plaintiff is already well down with the first paragraph of Section 574.
Supreme Court to 368/2549.
Defendant to lease land for the corridor and the location of the market and lease the building or buildings on the plaintiff. The agreement to pay rent, taxes, fees or any other money the tenant must pay the overdue rent. Tenants must pay the extra money as a penalty rate of 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid amount. Leases Leases of property, such as the Section 537 agreement, the penalty is a property lease agreement. The penalty must be filed within 6 months from the filing of the defendant to return property to rent.
Supreme Court in 1471/2548.
Article 4 states that the lease the lessee must maintain the leased property, all of which are in good condition and complete. To repair the wear and tear of normal use it. The agreement gives the tenant is required to reserve a rental property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. Requires little maintenance, and repair provided by Section 553 only. I mean that the lessee will be liable to repair the leased property in every case.
Repair, which is necessary and appropriate to maintain the leased property is in use. It is the duty of the defendant, the lessor under section 547 for use as a routine maintenance and repair, little will fall into the liability of the plaintiff, a tenant, not the defendant, the lessor is the party liable for such repairs. Section 550.
Supreme Court in 8879/2547.
The age of 6 months from the date of the return of property under Section 563 must be filed for damages from the use of vehicle damage incurred during the contract is still in force. But this case the defendant is a hire car from the plaintiff then fails to pay the lease and plaintiff's termination, but the fact that one does not deliver the car to lease back the plaintiff that the plaintiff has been damaged, the benefits to be gained from the car. Renting out a legal action against this. There is no specific statute law. The 10-year time limit under Section 193/30 for the plaintiff, then the car hire vehicle to be sold at less than the lease payment. This is also a lack of money that occurs after the contract has been terminated. If the age of 6 months when there is no law under Section 563 of them in particular. The 10-year time limit under Section 193/30 of the plaintiff is not entitled to terminate the call.
Supreme Court in 5032/2547.
Although Section 563 is not provided directly. The claim that the age of 6 months from the date of return of the leased property. Shall be a claim for damages incurred during the lease takes effect, but the fact that Section 563 prohibits states sued after the expiration of six months from the return of the leased property. The claim must be made in the days to return the leased property. It may occur during the contract is still in effect. Or during a lease to occupy the property. The plaintiff claims that the lease sale at prices less than the lease payment. The plaintiff's damages will be determined when the plaintiff has to hire a car and sell it back. The damage that occurs after the return of property leasing. If the age of six months under Section 563, but the absence of legal age, specifically. The age of 10 years under the Section 193/30.
Supreme Court to 188/2545.
The defendant did not serve as proof that the defendant, the car rental return car rental damage or the damage was the fault of the plaintiff as a result, the car rental obsolescence depreciation, the plaintiff is not liable to defendants under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 562. the first paragraph and the lease did not specify the defendant liable for the car rental part of the defendant on plaintiff's breach of contract may call for car rental is not the absence of the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 3564/2543.
This property is leased by the wording of Article 563 Civil and Commercial Code does not define them. And the return of the property. Leased by the said Section. The relevant law was not provided for or relating to the lease expiration or termination of the lease and the provisions of Section 564 to Section 571 (a suspension of the contract) is not defined by it. If you've got to return the leased property, the lease is terminated. Section 563, the age of 6 months must be returned to the rental property alone, without regard to the contract expiration or termination of the lease.
Supreme Court in 8602/2542.
Defendant, the plaintiff's land which is adjacent to the land of the defendant and the plaintiff and the defendant's land to Orange. We need to make up the ground of the plaintiff and defendant are equal before the soil is excavated channel and ridge waterproof The soil excavated from the land of the defendant to the plaintiff to the defendant's land reclamation in order to have the same ground level. The land of both the plaintiff and the defendant has a right to the Orange. Actions of the defendant, it is a conventional property lease under normal And at the end of the lease of land to the defendant and the plaintiff can claim to make up ground smooth or maintained in its original condition by the end of the lease agreement for the defendant's actions did not breach the lease to the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff could not rely on such termination of the lease.
Supreme Court in 2850/2541.
Plaintiff's land and mill contracts from the bank and then leased to the defendant. Later, fire, rice mills, rice mills and machinery were damaged during the fire, all the case. Plaintiff to pay the cost of land and mill to the banks to complete the contract. Banks have not been transferred to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has not given ownership of the land, and rice mills. But the plaintiff's possession and use of land and rice mills from contracts. By the plaintiff to the defendant to lease rice mill machinery. Mill and barn equipment, home office workers, where the plaintiff purchased the property from the bank. Moreover, when the plaintiff to pay the full cost of land and rice mills. It is owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is a stakeholder. When fire damaged the plaintiff. Argument, holding that the plaintiff was entitled to such property. According to the Code of Civil Procedure section 55, the plaintiff sued the defendant, who has the power to hire property shall not be liable.
Mill fire caused by short circuit. And did not appear to cause a short circuit is not the fault of the defendant tenant. The defendant is not liable to the plaintiff lessor.
Supreme Court in 6497/2540.
Entitled to claim depreciation on the car, ruined the car apart from the fact that the defendant by the Civil and Commercial Code Book 3. 5 with the purchase. The legal age is not provided directly. However, the defendant, as hire hire property, but only then. The commitment of the plaintiff to lease the property to be sold only Section 562 must hire property in a manner to apply mutatis mutandis. When the plaintiff returned to the car hire on March 23, 2537 if it can be considered a return of the leased property. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on September 7, 2537 not exceeding six months, the plaintiff's claims in this section does not terminate the debt.
Supreme Court in 3829/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant drove out of the building, 5th floor tenant disputes which have agreed in the lease agreement dated January 13, 2526 the monthly rate is 500 baht and the defendant fails to resolve a dispute with ownership. Or not the dispute in the interpretation of a contract which gives rise to rights on the property and evict the plaintiff sued the defendant is still in the lease. Made by the defendant to pay as stated in the letter. All occupants of 1.62 million baht to the plaintiff to the defendant is entitled to be registered for the building rights for a period of time lasting for 25 years and 6 months, 7 days pay for rent of 1.62 million baht, said that the defendant is entitled to. in the plaintiff's rent by the due date listed on the lease together. It is part of the rent paid in advance to the plaintiff, the plaintiff is entitled to payment for this calculation, the average rent is the rent. Monthly rental period is set up to pay monthly rent per month, 500 contracts were included, which is the average amount of the rent exceeds the monthly $ 5,000 do not have to do the plaintiff law on the facts of the execution. The Civil Section 248, paragraph two, was in force at the time the plaintiff filed a petition is dated July 31, 2534 (Meeting No. 5 / 2540).
Supreme Court in 6184/2540.
The plaintiff delivered possession to the defendant rented from the date of the lease, the defendant smashed wall dispute by the defendant was authorized by the plaintiff, a breach of contract Article 4 paragraph stating that the tenant will be modified. where tenants lease agreement that would allow people to rent first. When the landlord's approval and written permission. The act has been on leases, etc., and the second paragraph of Article 4 states that at the end. If the tenant violates the lease, the lessee shall have the right to return to its original condition by the tenants own expense. As a condition imposed by the lessor to the lessee shall have the right to return to its original condition only. Article 12 states that even in the lease if the tenant breach of contract. Even one of this contract. The lessor has the right to terminate the agreement immediately, etc., it is defined broadly, for breach of contract and does not indicate a specific force to do that. Thus, when the contract expressly stated that Article 4 in particular, that the lessor has the right to force it to demolish or restore the original state. The rental cost is therefore the contract. 12 A typical case is unenforceable.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 368 shall be construed in accordance with your wishes in good faith. It is customary to consider.
Row that the disputed contract clearly stated that Lessor agrees to lease the disputed rent two booths for commercial and residential, and the defendant is a tenant willing to lease two parties stand to make other products such as tiles. Which require the broad Because of the fact that a dispute broke the wall between the two buildings stand out is to trade for the purposes specified in the lease, which was registered. And actions of the defendants did not appear to dispute that the structure or foundation of a building damaged in any way. Regard to location, building disputes, which are along the main road adjacent to the market as the commercial and the defendant must pay the cost of the lease dispute two units, totaling about 4.8 million U.S. just to make the building settlement is the product. useful to engage in commerce. In addition, the building of 11 units of the plaintiff, including buildings, commercial disputes, it is two booths next to each other and there is no wall between the two cases where the lessee had to knock out a wall. If the defendant's request. Even so, the plaintiff would be allowed the same two defendants for breach of contract matter. However, when taking into account the wishes of the defendant made in good faith to engage in commerce. It examines the building's lease from the plaintiff, which has hit the wall, which is customary in the commercial lease with an agreement, the defendant did not cause the plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract. But when the defendant is guilty of a contract. Damages to the plaintiff, the defendant must be used.
Supreme Court in 1725/2540.
Road Town is the owner and the defendant disputed the plaintiff's lease. Who has the right to dispute the road or not. The dispute that the plaintiff has the right to use the road because of the defendant which the plaintiff is a tenant commercial building located along the disputed land. The tenant must offer all the leased property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. And require little maintenance, and repair by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 553 requires the plaintiff to dispute the road reserve. When the 6 wheels and 10-wheel truck ran into the road causing the dispute settlement roads are damaged, the faster the defendant off the road and do not dispute the plaintiff for the plaintiff's 10-wheel truck that ran through the rather well. And even in the lease states that rent for commercial and residential or commercial building. But when the lease does not specify explicitly that the trading of any kind. If the plant uses 10-wheeler truck, the defendant may not rent it. And the defendant does not preclude any law, the car ran off the road 4-wheel drive vehicles and pickup trucks to ever be put into it. But the plaintiff did not facilitate it. The defendant did not break the lease.
Supreme Court in 6092/2538.
When the case is evident that the defendant has to hire a car illegally. I always reserve assets and reserve the property of their Reply Post Reply will cause vehicle damage. Defendant is liable in respect of vehicles sold at lower prices due to damage, such as Section 562 of the lease agreement by a letter stating that it leases. When the lease expires. If the car hire fall in the value of life is not worth the purchase, the plaintiff has not paid all the debt contracted with the other defendants are still outstanding. The defendant shall be liable to pay the damages to the plaintiff is not completely well. Defendant is liable to pay the depreciated car lease to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 7371/2537.
About the liability of the lease under Section 562 if the damage to the leased property is not caused by the wrongful use of the property. It is not an act of the tenant or person who is a tenant. Or of the lease the lessee is not liable to the landlord. In addition to the liability agreement between the lessee and the lessor is effective between the parties only. The agreement alleged to give rise to a right to sue the tenant in damages to the leased property from outsiders who do not like.
Supreme Court in 6278/2537.
Land and tenement fires, as the plaintiff's father, the father of the plaintiff. Has the usufruct for life. The defendant for a period of seven years old when his father and the plaintiff. The death of the lease has not expired. The plaintiff is the assignee of such heritage, land and commercial building. The transfer of the rights of the plaintiff's father both have the right to information. The defendant has the right to eat this morning, too. Both the plaintiff sued the defendant. Lease state the purpose of renting it to the business of trading. The defendants present the defendant with the paper and scrap paper that is then stored in the Subject matter of the use of the leased property to be other than as specified in the contract, the defendant does not have a computer failure. fire and spends the night. Although the results of the investigation could not determine whether any person or cause a fire. But the fire was the fault of the defendant because, as mentioned above. Defendant is liable for any loss or damage incurred by any of the leased property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 552 and Section 562.
Supreme Court in 3496/2535.
The defendant tenant remains in the leased building, dispute later. The plaintiff, the lessor has to check that the defendants issued to pay the rent to be charged for the plaintiff, the defendant made the contract to the next without any time limit under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 570 later, plaintiff sent a letter terminating the contract. When the lease period, the rent payable by notice to the defendant to know before they pay the rent for a period of at least 566 shall be considered by the Civil and Commercial Leases have not been disputed. The defendant remains in possession of the disputed property. It is a violation, which must pay compensation to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, the defendant issued a check to the billing. It is billed as the only damage. I do not have a lease. The defendant made improvements to repair the roof, paint and set aside a room in a building dispute is deemed to be repaired by the defendant's duty under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 553 and is made to the defendant's own beauty and comfort. Phones do not have a reciprocal agreement in more than a conventional lease.
Supreme Court in 3974/2533.
The defendants are not party to the Sun to hire a car the defendant to the crime. But because the vehicles were seized because the defendant guilty of the accused MP lent itself. The product resulting from the actions of the prosecutor does. It is claimed that the defendant did not use official vehicles under hire-purchase because it is a cause for the defendant to pay plaintiff under the lease-purchase contract has not yet suspended. The defendant is obligated to pay the lease. To the plaintiff until the full contract or to terminate the contract lawfully. Contract to purchase the defaulted interest on overdue payments at a rate of 21 percent per year, but the plaintiff is entitled to claim only the default. I have the right to claim payment owed to the plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest at a rate of seven percent a year and a half.
Supreme Court in 2452/2525.
Car lease contract was entered into between the city bus to the plaintiff against the defendant on the Bangkok Mass Transit Authority. Transferred business and assets of the company that operates the city bus. Rental cars can be traced to a dispute without a new contract is a contract which is the original force.
The contract says. The lessor is responsible for any damage caused by the car rental. Including damage caused by accidents and acts of God. So that the lessor shall be responsible for any damage arising from the use of a car lease. Means that tenants who rent a car with normal conventional It will reserve the right property is the property of their Reply Post Reply. Tenants will not be liable for any damage that normally would arise from the use of the leased vehicle. The second defendant, an employee of the defendant, a tenant has a lease with careless driving following a collision with another vehicle was damaged in violation of a defendant is liable for any damage to the leased property.
Supreme Court to 119/2522.
Rent from the plaintiff and the defendant's transformer to the main villain of the agreement the tenant will be responsible for damage to occur, unless exceptional circumstances. The transformer is installed in a place where she rented out the house she had landed a half mile up the debris. The defendant is not in nature to prevent the criminals steal the transformer during nighttime. Because of the rain during the round, which has the power goes out. The defendant is to examine the defendant shall be deemed not exercised reasonable care to prevent damage, do not. The main villain in this case, the transformer is an act which the defendant can not be prevented. The defendant shall not be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff.
Section 553 tenants have to reserve a rental property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. And require little maintenance and repairs as well.
Section 554 if the tenant violates the provisions of Section 552 or Section 553 violates the agreement. Notice to the lessor to the lessee shall be required by law or contract and the lessee can not ignore the non-compliance. He said the lessor to terminate the contract was broken.
Section 555 tenant must allow the landlord or agent of the landlord to inspect the leased property from time to time. In a reasonable time and distance.
Section 556 if the period of lease is a rental property which needs to be repaired, it is urgent And the lessor would be necessary to repair such a gem. That the tenant will not let you do that do not. Even if it is an inconvenience to her. If the repair is a condition which is unreasonably long. It is why the property is not suitable for the purpose of leasing it. Tenants will pay a termination.
Section 557 in any case, as the following.
(1) If the leased property is damaged, should the landlord have to repair it.
(2) If you need to manage one of the dangers of such property to parry it.
(3) If a third party intrusion into the leased property or private property is the right one above it.
In such case the tenant to notify the landlord immediately. Unless the lessor is aware that it is already.
If the tenant fails to comply with the provisions of this neglected gem. That the lessee will be liable to the lessor when the lessor should be any delay because of the neglect of the lease.
Section 558 of the leased property. If the landlord's permission first. Tenants will be modified or added one can not. If the lessee and made possible by the permission of the lessor, such as the gem. When the landlord claims the tenant must give the property back to its original condition and will be liable to the lessor for loss or damage caused by any modification, but annex it.
Section 559 is not required by contract or by custom, that will pay rent at any time, you pay at the end of the period, which has agreed to set aside every now and then. That is, if an annual rental fee is payable at the end of the year. If a monthly rental fee is payable at the end of the month.
Section 560 if the tenant fails to pay the rent. The lessor may terminate the contract time.
However, if the rent was to be sent on a monthly basis. Or for a period longer than a month or more. The lessor must notify the tenant that the rent shall be paid within no time. Which shall be not less than fifteen days.
Section 561 is not made in writing and signed by the parties stated that the property is leased to state how You shall be presumed that the tenant has leased the property to good condition and repair. The contract has been terminated or terminated. Lessee must return the property in such condition. Unless they can prove that the property is not repaired in time for delivery.
Article 562 The lessee shall be liable for any loss or damage. It happened to the leased property. It's the fault of the tenant. Or persons who are tenants. Or of the sublease.
The tenant shall not be liable for loss or damage arising from the use of such property.
Section 563 cases, the lessor can sue the tenant on the lease, you shall not be filed after the expiration of six months from the return of the leased property.
Supreme Court in 6179/2551.
The plaintiff is entitled to lease state's Division of the Department of Treasury, Ministry of Finance. Building, commercial building, No. 231 the plaintiff sued to expel the defendant from the property valuable for the filing month, 2,000 a plaintiff may claim damages from the date of termination of the contract month, 10,000 are reimbursed as part of a lawsuit against the driver. chase. It must appeal to the facts Civil Code Procedure Section 224 paragraph one and paragraph two. The defendant appealed that The plaintiff did not intend to sublease the leasehold. An appeal on the issue of facts to lead to legislation that Sublease agreement is a legal right to secretly transfer the lease or not. The defendant appealed on this point by the judges who sit in the trial court did not. That there are reasonable grounds to appeal the violation of the provisions of that law.
The sub-floor building, the agreement is a contract that the duration of the contract must comply with Section 566 of the sublease agreement is the agreement to pay 2,000 baht a month's rent. the payment of rent, of course. It takes a month to pay rent under the Section 559 plaintiff and the defendant in writing to terminate the sublease agreement was received on August 4, 2537 plaintiff filed a lawsuit on March 21, 2538 termination. sublease was like then.
Supreme Court in 6159/2551.
When rental property is a standard factory and after the plaintiff has been damaged, the entire contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is terminated in accordance with Section 567 on the leased property is lost or damaged completely. It is not possible to return the leased property to the plaintiff's case is not in force must be filed within 6 months from the date the defendant to return the leased property in accordance with Section 563, describes the plaintiff's complaint. that the defendant's actions. As a result, the plant violated the standards of both the plaintiff has been damaged after the fire, the plaintiff must sue for compensation may be used within one year from the date the plaintiff knew about the abuse and may be used for compensation. When it appears that Commission of Inquiry to find them liable in civil proceedings that the plaintiff had been appointed. Report its findings to inform them of liability in a civil governor of the plaintiff says. Does not appear that anyone involved in the fire and will be liable in a civil, but that the defendant tenant's breach of contract and causing damage to the leased property the defendant must compensate the plaintiff described to sue. that the defendant has. Duties under the contract must be delivered from the factory standard for the plaintiff in the Night. When you do not have to pay compensation. This case has no provisions for a particular age. It requires a 10-year-old general.
The standard factory fire the plaintiff. When the defendant's possession of a dangerous power over the property by the defendant do not care conditions to cause a fire. Defendant is liable. Unless the defendant can prove that the damage was not unexpected. Was not unexpected, nor was it the fault of the plaintiff, who is the victim. The defendant has not denied liability.
Supreme Court in 4526/2550.
Section 563 refers to a lawsuit if the tenant breached the duty of the lessee by the provisions of Section 552 to Section 562, however, the plaintiff filed a charge against the defendant owed. and the lack of benefit from the plaintiff, the defendant did not receive the full value of the contract. Civil and Commercial Code or other laws, not provided for by statute. The age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Supreme Court to 408/2550.
The Supreme Court ruled that the defendant and the plaintiff's settlement with the family out of the building. The two co-defendants for the plaintiff in building such a good condition and repair the damage done to the plaintiff until after delivery. A. The lease agreement that disputes some of the accused and the family of T. The two defendants and held that the defendant s case has occupied the building along both held that the defendant did not have both. The building was completed the dispute to the plaintiff s case was in the building and room keys to the plaintiff before the Court. It held that the defendant delivered to the plaintiff disputes the building is completed on such date. The plaintiff is entitled to damages up to that date.
Supreme Court in 4644/2549.
The hire-purchase agreements to terminate the agreement if the lease fails to pay any lease for one installment on the purchase and possession of a car lease. If sales are not enough to pay the lease, the lease continues to be paid under the contract, including any costs and damages, the total net value of the hire-purchase was paid. The lease agreement will reimburse the amount lost to the owner. The agreement is a hire-purchase agreement, claims for compensation. The legal action against the non-payment of the fee payable. And it's not as if the operators in the leasing of movable property as a rental. So do not fall into the age of 2 years under Section 193/34 (6) and is not a case where the landlord sue the tenant on the lease at the age of 6 months when there is no legal age limit. The specific. The 10-year-old must be under 193/30.
Supreme Court in 3807/2549.
The plaintiff sued the lack of a car lease, then after the contract termination. There is no provision of law, the statute in this particular case. Must be age 10 years when the lease terminated under Section 193/30 of May 30, 2541 the plaintiff filed a lawsuit on September 10, 2544 did not terminate the plaintiff.
Age 6 months, according to Section 563, it is rent property I used to claim the lack of benefit from using the car hire.
Hire-purchase and lease agreements are not at fault, then quit. The lease was forfeited and the defendant paid the plaintiff is already well down with the first paragraph of Section 574.
Supreme Court to 368/2549.
Defendant to lease land for the corridor and the location of the market and lease the building or buildings on the plaintiff. The agreement to pay rent, taxes, fees or any other money the tenant must pay the overdue rent. Tenants must pay the extra money as a penalty rate of 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid amount. Leases Leases of property, such as the Section 537 agreement, the penalty is a property lease agreement. The penalty must be filed within 6 months from the filing of the defendant to return property to rent.
Supreme Court in 1471/2548.
Article 4 states that the lease the lessee must maintain the leased property, all of which are in good condition and complete. To repair the wear and tear of normal use it. The agreement gives the tenant is required to reserve a rental property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. Requires little maintenance, and repair provided by Section 553 only. I mean that the lessee will be liable to repair the leased property in every case.
Repair, which is necessary and appropriate to maintain the leased property is in use. It is the duty of the defendant, the lessor under section 547 for use as a routine maintenance and repair, little will fall into the liability of the plaintiff, a tenant, not the defendant, the lessor is the party liable for such repairs. Section 550.
Supreme Court in 8879/2547.
The age of 6 months from the date of the return of property under Section 563 must be filed for damages from the use of vehicle damage incurred during the contract is still in force. But this case the defendant is a hire car from the plaintiff then fails to pay the lease and plaintiff's termination, but the fact that one does not deliver the car to lease back the plaintiff that the plaintiff has been damaged, the benefits to be gained from the car. Renting out a legal action against this. There is no specific statute law. The 10-year time limit under Section 193/30 for the plaintiff, then the car hire vehicle to be sold at less than the lease payment. This is also a lack of money that occurs after the contract has been terminated. If the age of 6 months when there is no law under Section 563 of them in particular. The 10-year time limit under Section 193/30 of the plaintiff is not entitled to terminate the call.
Supreme Court in 5032/2547.
Although Section 563 is not provided directly. The claim that the age of 6 months from the date of return of the leased property. Shall be a claim for damages incurred during the lease takes effect, but the fact that Section 563 prohibits states sued after the expiration of six months from the return of the leased property. The claim must be made in the days to return the leased property. It may occur during the contract is still in effect. Or during a lease to occupy the property. The plaintiff claims that the lease sale at prices less than the lease payment. The plaintiff's damages will be determined when the plaintiff has to hire a car and sell it back. The damage that occurs after the return of property leasing. If the age of six months under Section 563, but the absence of legal age, specifically. The age of 10 years under the Section 193/30.
Supreme Court to 188/2545.
The defendant did not serve as proof that the defendant, the car rental return car rental damage or the damage was the fault of the plaintiff as a result, the car rental obsolescence depreciation, the plaintiff is not liable to defendants under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 562. the first paragraph and the lease did not specify the defendant liable for the car rental part of the defendant on plaintiff's breach of contract may call for car rental is not the absence of the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 3564/2543.
This property is leased by the wording of Article 563 Civil and Commercial Code does not define them. And the return of the property. Leased by the said Section. The relevant law was not provided for or relating to the lease expiration or termination of the lease and the provisions of Section 564 to Section 571 (a suspension of the contract) is not defined by it. If you've got to return the leased property, the lease is terminated. Section 563, the age of 6 months must be returned to the rental property alone, without regard to the contract expiration or termination of the lease.
Supreme Court in 8602/2542.
Defendant, the plaintiff's land which is adjacent to the land of the defendant and the plaintiff and the defendant's land to Orange. We need to make up the ground of the plaintiff and defendant are equal before the soil is excavated channel and ridge waterproof The soil excavated from the land of the defendant to the plaintiff to the defendant's land reclamation in order to have the same ground level. The land of both the plaintiff and the defendant has a right to the Orange. Actions of the defendant, it is a conventional property lease under normal And at the end of the lease of land to the defendant and the plaintiff can claim to make up ground smooth or maintained in its original condition by the end of the lease agreement for the defendant's actions did not breach the lease to the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff could not rely on such termination of the lease.
Supreme Court in 2850/2541.
Plaintiff's land and mill contracts from the bank and then leased to the defendant. Later, fire, rice mills, rice mills and machinery were damaged during the fire, all the case. Plaintiff to pay the cost of land and mill to the banks to complete the contract. Banks have not been transferred to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has not given ownership of the land, and rice mills. But the plaintiff's possession and use of land and rice mills from contracts. By the plaintiff to the defendant to lease rice mill machinery. Mill and barn equipment, home office workers, where the plaintiff purchased the property from the bank. Moreover, when the plaintiff to pay the full cost of land and rice mills. It is owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is a stakeholder. When fire damaged the plaintiff. Argument, holding that the plaintiff was entitled to such property. According to the Code of Civil Procedure section 55, the plaintiff sued the defendant, who has the power to hire property shall not be liable.
Mill fire caused by short circuit. And did not appear to cause a short circuit is not the fault of the defendant tenant. The defendant is not liable to the plaintiff lessor.
Supreme Court in 6497/2540.
Entitled to claim depreciation on the car, ruined the car apart from the fact that the defendant by the Civil and Commercial Code Book 3. 5 with the purchase. The legal age is not provided directly. However, the defendant, as hire hire property, but only then. The commitment of the plaintiff to lease the property to be sold only Section 562 must hire property in a manner to apply mutatis mutandis. When the plaintiff returned to the car hire on March 23, 2537 if it can be considered a return of the leased property. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on September 7, 2537 not exceeding six months, the plaintiff's claims in this section does not terminate the debt.
Supreme Court in 3829/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant drove out of the building, 5th floor tenant disputes which have agreed in the lease agreement dated January 13, 2526 the monthly rate is 500 baht and the defendant fails to resolve a dispute with ownership. Or not the dispute in the interpretation of a contract which gives rise to rights on the property and evict the plaintiff sued the defendant is still in the lease. Made by the defendant to pay as stated in the letter. All occupants of 1.62 million baht to the plaintiff to the defendant is entitled to be registered for the building rights for a period of time lasting for 25 years and 6 months, 7 days pay for rent of 1.62 million baht, said that the defendant is entitled to. in the plaintiff's rent by the due date listed on the lease together. It is part of the rent paid in advance to the plaintiff, the plaintiff is entitled to payment for this calculation, the average rent is the rent. Monthly rental period is set up to pay monthly rent per month, 500 contracts were included, which is the average amount of the rent exceeds the monthly $ 5,000 do not have to do the plaintiff law on the facts of the execution. The Civil Section 248, paragraph two, was in force at the time the plaintiff filed a petition is dated July 31, 2534 (Meeting No. 5 / 2540).
Supreme Court in 6184/2540.
The plaintiff delivered possession to the defendant rented from the date of the lease, the defendant smashed wall dispute by the defendant was authorized by the plaintiff, a breach of contract Article 4 paragraph stating that the tenant will be modified. where tenants lease agreement that would allow people to rent first. When the landlord's approval and written permission. The act has been on leases, etc., and the second paragraph of Article 4 states that at the end. If the tenant violates the lease, the lessee shall have the right to return to its original condition by the tenants own expense. As a condition imposed by the lessor to the lessee shall have the right to return to its original condition only. Article 12 states that even in the lease if the tenant breach of contract. Even one of this contract. The lessor has the right to terminate the agreement immediately, etc., it is defined broadly, for breach of contract and does not indicate a specific force to do that. Thus, when the contract expressly stated that Article 4 in particular, that the lessor has the right to force it to demolish or restore the original state. The rental cost is therefore the contract. 12 A typical case is unenforceable.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 368 shall be construed in accordance with your wishes in good faith. It is customary to consider.
Row that the disputed contract clearly stated that Lessor agrees to lease the disputed rent two booths for commercial and residential, and the defendant is a tenant willing to lease two parties stand to make other products such as tiles. Which require the broad Because of the fact that a dispute broke the wall between the two buildings stand out is to trade for the purposes specified in the lease, which was registered. And actions of the defendants did not appear to dispute that the structure or foundation of a building damaged in any way. Regard to location, building disputes, which are along the main road adjacent to the market as the commercial and the defendant must pay the cost of the lease dispute two units, totaling about 4.8 million U.S. just to make the building settlement is the product. useful to engage in commerce. In addition, the building of 11 units of the plaintiff, including buildings, commercial disputes, it is two booths next to each other and there is no wall between the two cases where the lessee had to knock out a wall. If the defendant's request. Even so, the plaintiff would be allowed the same two defendants for breach of contract matter. However, when taking into account the wishes of the defendant made in good faith to engage in commerce. It examines the building's lease from the plaintiff, which has hit the wall, which is customary in the commercial lease with an agreement, the defendant did not cause the plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract. But when the defendant is guilty of a contract. Damages to the plaintiff, the defendant must be used.
Supreme Court in 1725/2540.
Road Town is the owner and the defendant disputed the plaintiff's lease. Who has the right to dispute the road or not. The dispute that the plaintiff has the right to use the road because of the defendant which the plaintiff is a tenant commercial building located along the disputed land. The tenant must offer all the leased property that Reply Post Reply will reserve the property of their own. And require little maintenance, and repair by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 553 requires the plaintiff to dispute the road reserve. When the 6 wheels and 10-wheel truck ran into the road causing the dispute settlement roads are damaged, the faster the defendant off the road and do not dispute the plaintiff for the plaintiff's 10-wheel truck that ran through the rather well. And even in the lease states that rent for commercial and residential or commercial building. But when the lease does not specify explicitly that the trading of any kind. If the plant uses 10-wheeler truck, the defendant may not rent it. And the defendant does not preclude any law, the car ran off the road 4-wheel drive vehicles and pickup trucks to ever be put into it. But the plaintiff did not facilitate it. The defendant did not break the lease.
Supreme Court in 6092/2538.
When the case is evident that the defendant has to hire a car illegally. I always reserve assets and reserve the property of their Reply Post Reply will cause vehicle damage. Defendant is liable in respect of vehicles sold at lower prices due to damage, such as Section 562 of the lease agreement by a letter stating that it leases. When the lease expires. If the car hire fall in the value of life is not worth the purchase, the plaintiff has not paid all the debt contracted with the other defendants are still outstanding. The defendant shall be liable to pay the damages to the plaintiff is not completely well. Defendant is liable to pay the depreciated car lease to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 7371/2537.
About the liability of the lease under Section 562 if the damage to the leased property is not caused by the wrongful use of the property. It is not an act of the tenant or person who is a tenant. Or of the lease the lessee is not liable to the landlord. In addition to the liability agreement between the lessee and the lessor is effective between the parties only. The agreement alleged to give rise to a right to sue the tenant in damages to the leased property from outsiders who do not like.
Supreme Court in 6278/2537.
Land and tenement fires, as the plaintiff's father, the father of the plaintiff. Has the usufruct for life. The defendant for a period of seven years old when his father and the plaintiff. The death of the lease has not expired. The plaintiff is the assignee of such heritage, land and commercial building. The transfer of the rights of the plaintiff's father both have the right to information. The defendant has the right to eat this morning, too. Both the plaintiff sued the defendant. Lease state the purpose of renting it to the business of trading. The defendants present the defendant with the paper and scrap paper that is then stored in the Subject matter of the use of the leased property to be other than as specified in the contract, the defendant does not have a computer failure. fire and spends the night. Although the results of the investigation could not determine whether any person or cause a fire. But the fire was the fault of the defendant because, as mentioned above. Defendant is liable for any loss or damage incurred by any of the leased property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 552 and Section 562.
Supreme Court in 3496/2535.
The defendant tenant remains in the leased building, dispute later. The plaintiff, the lessor has to check that the defendants issued to pay the rent to be charged for the plaintiff, the defendant made the contract to the next without any time limit under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 570 later, plaintiff sent a letter terminating the contract. When the lease period, the rent payable by notice to the defendant to know before they pay the rent for a period of at least 566 shall be considered by the Civil and Commercial Leases have not been disputed. The defendant remains in possession of the disputed property. It is a violation, which must pay compensation to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, the defendant issued a check to the billing. It is billed as the only damage. I do not have a lease. The defendant made improvements to repair the roof, paint and set aside a room in a building dispute is deemed to be repaired by the defendant's duty under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 553 and is made to the defendant's own beauty and comfort. Phones do not have a reciprocal agreement in more than a conventional lease.
Supreme Court in 3974/2533.
The defendants are not party to the Sun to hire a car the defendant to the crime. But because the vehicles were seized because the defendant guilty of the accused MP lent itself. The product resulting from the actions of the prosecutor does. It is claimed that the defendant did not use official vehicles under hire-purchase because it is a cause for the defendant to pay plaintiff under the lease-purchase contract has not yet suspended. The defendant is obligated to pay the lease. To the plaintiff until the full contract or to terminate the contract lawfully. Contract to purchase the defaulted interest on overdue payments at a rate of 21 percent per year, but the plaintiff is entitled to claim only the default. I have the right to claim payment owed to the plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest at a rate of seven percent a year and a half.
Supreme Court in 2452/2525.
Car lease contract was entered into between the city bus to the plaintiff against the defendant on the Bangkok Mass Transit Authority. Transferred business and assets of the company that operates the city bus. Rental cars can be traced to a dispute without a new contract is a contract which is the original force.
The contract says. The lessor is responsible for any damage caused by the car rental. Including damage caused by accidents and acts of God. So that the lessor shall be responsible for any damage arising from the use of a car lease. Means that tenants who rent a car with normal conventional It will reserve the right property is the property of their Reply Post Reply. Tenants will not be liable for any damage that normally would arise from the use of the leased vehicle. The second defendant, an employee of the defendant, a tenant has a lease with careless driving following a collision with another vehicle was damaged in violation of a defendant is liable for any damage to the leased property.
Supreme Court to 119/2522.
Rent from the plaintiff and the defendant's transformer to the main villain of the agreement the tenant will be responsible for damage to occur, unless exceptional circumstances. The transformer is installed in a place where she rented out the house she had landed a half mile up the debris. The defendant is not in nature to prevent the criminals steal the transformer during nighttime. Because of the rain during the round, which has the power goes out. The defendant is to examine the defendant shall be deemed not exercised reasonable care to prevent damage, do not. The main villain in this case, the transformer is an act which the defendant can not be prevented. The defendant shall not be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff.
