Section 458 ownership of the property is sold. Would transfer to the buyer from now on. The contracts.
Section 459 if the contract terms or forced to Terms of time. That he has not transferred ownership of the property until the conditions are or are due Terms of time that
Section 460 in the sale of property which does not set down on the course. You do not transfer the title until the means or the Weights and Measures, or selection, or by other means. To indicate the. Of course, that property is already out.
The purchase of only one property. If the seller will still have the Weights and Measures or the other or do anything in relation to the property to be aware of. Of course, the price of such property. You of the title. Not transferred to the buyer or until it has done already.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5309/2551.
Plaintiff's car from the defendant disputes. Settle some dispute and authorized vehicle to occupy and use. Agreement that the plaintiff must pay for some of the remaining defendants within the two years it will transfer the vehicle registration to the name dispute plaintiff. As long as the plaintiff to pay the rest, the defendant did not complete within two years the defendant will not transfer the vehicle registration as a plaintiff. Is taken of terms of trade acts as a relay shall be Effect until the plaintiff to pay the remaining debt to the defendant to complete ownership of the car. Dispute is not transferred to the buyer as soon as the plaintiff disputes the same car. Car sale agreement is a trade dispute is not done strictly prohibited.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4643/2551.
Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, provided that if payments under the contract is not finished machinery and equipment specified in the contract remain the property of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to return in good condition at any time. The agreement provided for transfer by Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 agreement when the defendant guilty. The plaintiff terminated the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant would return to the original position. Defendant to return machine equipped with hot water to the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit to force the defendant to return machine equipped with hot water if the night is not the price. It is the case, the plaintiff, as owner of the property monitoring took the property back from the defendant. No right to take under Section 1336, with no limitation
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2496/2551.
While the petitioner and the defendant's car central contracts each defendant has not delivered car Parts of the middle to the petitioner and the petitioner to hold settlement money of 50,000 baht by the defendant's car will be delivered to the petitioner in the middle date of receipt of payment for the rest of it is dealing with conditions under the contract Civil Code Section 459 of the middle car ownership is not transferred until the petitioner will pay the same price and transfer of the petitioner is not a registered owner of the car a true center. No right to apply for the return of the stolen property car Criminal Law Section 36.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1786/2551.
Trade between the plaintiff and the defendant leaves the ship with the message that Products listed above. Although it had been delivered to the buyer. It is also a property of the seller until the buyer has completed payment slip though the product will not appear signature of the sender and the receiver. But that document is a copy photos directly to the end of the document which the plaintiff said in the lawsuit. Complaint, and attest to the text in the document and then expressly stated for the original loss lost by the defendant to acknowledge Products purchased from the plaintiff as such documents are real. And does not attest to refuse to agree with arguments that do not know the text in that document, so listen to that contract between the plaintiff and the defendant had ownership of the property purchase conditions. Sales are not transferred unless the conditions are as follows: Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459, when the plaintiff has not received payment for goods. Ownership of the property is still dealing with the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1013/2550.
Contract sales unit between the seller and the plaintiff buyer says sales (units) with parking numbers from 538 to 540, 547 to 549 of the Building parking 5 vehicles to the plaintiff as money 10,014,333 U.S. holds that the plaintiff has title. In units with parking from now on be. Contracts traded, followed Civil and Commercial Code, Section 458, which the plaintiff as owner of the property. Shall be entitled to various as provided in Section 1336.
Parking in the condominium by the state shall hold the other assets that are intended to be used. Or for the mutual benefit for the co-owners. It is the common property. Condominium Act BE 2522, Section 4, but when an agreement to sell units that plaintiff purchased the property to indicate that sales (units) with parking Parking as set forth shall become the property of the plaintiff with units and is not considered "common property" of the condominium anymore, but is "property of the person" of the plaintiff and defendant, a condominium is not to issue regulations or actions. any parking on that later as a convenience to the plaintiff's loss. Who is the owner of the property. Although plaintiff's unpaid common expenses exceeding 6 months, the defendant also like to admonish another separate case. When the defendant to issue regulations prohibiting the plaintiff to the car parked in the car park under an agreement to sell even the plaintiff must be parked in the car to another place. And to pay costs up unnecessarily. Considered as a functional property rights hinder the plaintiff's agreement to sell units. Can be considered an intentional act in violation of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has been damaged. Defendant must pay damages to the plaintiff.
Condominium Act BE 2522, Section 33 states that condominium is intended to manage and maintain common property and shall have the authority to act for the benefit of any such purpose. The defendant to issue regulations that would require cars to park in the car park. Defendant must receive a sticker from the car prior to the defendant, which the management and Custody is the central car park to the same rules. The defendant shall be made as set forth in the Charter to obtain a sticker. Parking in the car park, but any one of the defendants stipulated in Article 2 that co-owner who has the right to obtain a sticker in accordance with Article 1 shall not hold more than 6 months pay public can not be done. Because of the unpaid monthly maintenance fee is a debt that must be impeccable execution under the law to issue regulations as this is an avoidance to not exercise claim to be intended to coerce out the plaintiff will ensure compliance. regulation of the defendant is. Not in compliance with its intention to enforce the law. Condominium Act BE 2522, can not force the plaintiff to remove.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6337/2550.
Rights under the law are the same style. When in any manner that shall be used features. Be carried out in the provisions on transfer of ownership to the buyer or not in the Civil and Commercial trade is the right diagnosis of the vendor incurred but not insurance. The rights of the insured arising, but the policy will only have to do is go under the policy. When the plaintiff to 1 (the seller) and defendant (insurer) has agreed to all types of insurance that may arise throughout the duration of the carrier to transport goods from origin to destination, Bangkok USA Conditional insurance coverage ends when the plaintiff is not the first carrier to deliver goods to the trading conditions, F. Oh. Crumble, but the protection is always a carrier to transport from origin to destination, Bangkok USA When the goods are lost in transit. The defendant insurer liable for compensation under the contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4767/2549.
Contract disputes indicates that car ownership in the car will fall to the buyer when the price paid in several installments as set out fully and then considered the contract terms. This title is not transferred to the buyer. Until the buyer paid full price. Trading on the condition that the property is transferred in the future together. Sellers may have owned property in the future be issued in advance. And is a function of the seller to transfer the property to the buyer. When the buyer's conditions and operations. Sellers do not need a title to the property at the time the contracts so that the plaintiff and the defendant made the contract of sale car ownership in the property dispute by the parties later on. Even when contracts are not plaintiff's ownership or title to property is not complete. Contract, it has become enforceable. The defendant refused to pay for breach of contract to the plaintiff and caused the plaintiff to terminate the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the power.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5591/2543.
Contract, it says permitting sale conditions the agreement in article 1 that the sale agreement to sell and purchase agreement to buy a car, to resolve the price 1,235,680 baht in contracts this will purchase payment to the. it sold 70,000 baht, pending another 1,165,680 baht of the contract that will pay to the person selling a period every month period at 48,570 baht at the offices of the sale be completed within 24 months and 5. This agreement states that the text of the agreement will be valid for the property vested in the people who will buy when it purchased to comply with all the messages in this agreement. And who will sell the right to terminate the agreement and called upon people to buy the property does not comply with this agreement, whether any one or any of that agreement, the agreement is conditional. N / A indicates that a lease that property owners take the property out for rent and pledged to sell the property or the property will be vested right to the lessee. The terms of the lease to the amounts as much as this time, the clause 9 which states that if the purchase failed to pay price as the period is the period which, etc. The purchase lets assume this Agreement shall be deemed immediately from the agenda. The notice is not required and have the right to remove the vehicle without having to buy back the refund paid to buy it. A voluntary agreement of the parties and to protect the interests of the seller not to damage than necessary only when a buyer breach of contract. Find the contracts on the condition turns out not to lease.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1007/2543.
Petitioner made a contract to acquire vehicles of medium from the sale of the vehicle installment contracts. The agreement requires the petitioner to pay for vehicles of the middle part of the contract date. The remaining repayment period including 24 motorcycles settlement has been reached when the seller had to be transferred. Contract vehicles is the central contract conditions. When it appears that before the civil court ruled to confiscate the vehicles of the middle. Petitioner had not paid the last installment to the seller. Ownership of the motorcycle is still in the middle of the sale, although subsequently the Court of First Instance ruled to confiscate vehicles of any medium. However, vehicles of the mid court ruled to confiscate the land is vested in the Court that if the forfeiture of the final medium. But while the Court to confiscate the property in dispute is not the owner of the property of the medium still has the power to the alienation of their property. When it appears that the District Court has ruled to confiscate the vehicles of the middle. A party without any appeal petition. Court of First Instance that it will be possible only when the duration of the appeal petition is terminated, as provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure Section 147, paragraph two contains the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 15, so before the Court of First Instance that. will be final. The seller of motorcycle ownership in the middle can also be transferred in the middle of the motorcycle to the petitioner. When the petitioner has the final settlement before the Court of First Instance to confiscate vehicles of medium is most The seller can transfer to the petitioner. And held that the petitioner is the owner of the real center of a motorcycle has the right to apply for the return of the Central. When the petitioner and the seller, the original owner of the motorcycle while the middle is used to retain the offender is not responsible for the offense. It should return to the vehicles of the mid-barker
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2489/2536.
Contract dispute Car conditions indicate that the disputed ownership of the vehicle is not transferred to the buyer. Until full payment for the period specified in the contract shall come into force under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 and the contract states that if the buyer failed to pay the price period. Sellers have the right to dispute and possession of vehicle by public auction shall be entitled to, and when sold was not enough money. Buyers willing to pay money that is lacking. When the buyer failed to pay the price and the seller took the vehicle auction disputes under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 470, and 471 had no money and then 55,260 more U.S. buyer and guarantor is liable. It is considered a cash settlement price of the car is missing. And the amount of the contract does not require any of the damages it is not a penalty. Contract No. 6 in the second paragraph states that if the buyer failed various payment schedules specified in the contract. Or failed to pay any debt under this Agreement, the buyer agrees to pay interest to the vendor rate 15 percent per year, amounting to 55,260 baht, a silver price of cars disputes absent is the annuity various stimuli from the user. Buy failed to pay the plaintiff the period specified in the contract the seller had the right to charge interest rate of 15 percent per year from the purchase contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3728/2535.
Contract which states that car. Proprietary trading vehicles will not be transferred to the buyer until the buyer paid full price causes the cash amount specified in the contract before then. The contract terms. Forced together by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459, when the parties agreed purchase price of the course, and a number of plaintiffs who sold to the defendant to pay a buyer bids on a contract of hire purchase price, then the rest of the period. And an agreement that if the buyer defaulted payment for any period. Allow a seller to the buyer pay for the remaining 15 per cent and interest rates all year immediately following the first defendant to be bound by the contract. When the defendant. 1 does not comply with the contract by late payment for the period agreed upon by the defendant that a plaintiff is liable to pay interest as well as terms and the third defendant as the guarantor, it must be jointly liable with Although it may appear to come before the settlement period in which 14 cars were traded by criminal theft did not appear to be the fault of the plaintiff or a defendant, but whether the contract specifies clearly that Duties and liabilities of the purchase will not exhaustive due to loss of motor vehicles is still a defendant is liable to pay plaintiff in full vehicle price. Because such agreements, except provisions of section 372, first paragraph of the Civil and Commercial Code. The provisions of the law relating to non-public peace or public morality. The parties would have agreed otherwise. Not void under section 114 (same).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4643/2551.
Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, provided that if payments under the contract is not finished. Machinery and equipment specified in the agreement remain the property of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to return in good condition at any time. The agreement provided for transfer by Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 agreement when the defendant guilty. The plaintiff terminated the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant would return to the original position. Defendant to return machine equipped with hot water to the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit to force the defendant to return machine equipped with hot water. If the night is not the price. It is the case, the plaintiff, as owner of the property monitoring took the property back from the defendant has no right to take under Section 1336, with no limitation
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2496/2551.
While the petitioner and the defendant contracts car center each defendant has not delivered the car central to the petitioner and the petitioner to hold settlement money of 50,000 baht by the defendant to deliver the car central to the petitioner in date of receipt of payment for the rest. There is agreement that the conditions under Commercial Code, Section 459 of the middle car ownership is not transferred until the petitioner will pay for each registration and transfer. Petitioner is not the owner of the car a true center. No right to apply for the return of the stolen property car Criminal Code Section 36.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3335/2548.
Defendant to combat just that. Plaintiff's complaint, which said the state charged with breach of contract, the defendant transferred the right hire. However, the application shall refund to the defendant to the plaintiff. Defendant could not understand what the intention that the plaintiff can not fight the case properly. Words of the defendant does not describe that. The plaintiff to sue any ambiguous or not clear how Content of the complaint or how conflicts. The reader may not understand. Treated as words that are not clear. There is no issue to be diagnosed.
Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant is a trading vehicle disputes by allowing the plaintiff the defendant who sold the installment purchase price and the condition that the plaintiff is a transfer of the installment price on completion. Contract is conditional on a transfer of ownership under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 on the trading price of real estate agreements from 500 baht to not even have evidence in writing signed by the party liable. But if a regular place or have some debt, then the parties would have the same enforcement lawsuit under Section 456 paragraph two and paragraph three When the defendant disputes the plaintiff agreed to sell cars at a price of 200,000 baht and the installment payment to the plaintiff determines that plaintiff has put 95,000 regular and part payment to the defendant. The plaintiff then sued to force the case.
The plaintiff the defendant agreed to terminate the contract dispute by trading cars voluntary mutual The plaintiff and the defendant would return to the same position as is. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 391, when the plaintiff gave the defendant back to car disputes. Defendant has the duty to return money received to the plaintiff. With interest The age of the plaintiff's claims under Section 193/30 of 10 years.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7160/2545.
Petitioner is to purchase the disputed land with buildings on the land and its service stations by the defendant. Paid to some of the cost and ownership of the contract, then traded. The petitioner is entitled to purchase a call to the defendant, who will sell the assets transferred under the contract will be traded to the petitioner by the petitioner must pay the remaining cost. Prior to the transfer of possession is possession by the defendant's right to live. Considered not that the petitioner is responsible specifically for the Code of Civil Procedure Section 296 quarter (3) the petitioner is the subject of the defendant, which is a court driven Enforcement Officer shall have the power to do so, follow Cmbeongceb issued. the sentence was. Find the right to force the case is not unlawful.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8325/2543.
Although trade disputes between the B scale. And the defendant have agreed that if the data. Buyers can not pay money to the defendant sellers. In any event, whether by allowing the defendant to accept the settlement scales back, instantly regardless of the scale is disputing any place. However, the trade balance is traded on movable property and to identify certain price, and did not appear to have an agreement to purchase it. If the buyer does not pay full price to sell property owned by the seller until the buyer to pay full price at all. Contract is not conditional, but a final contract finished even text. Will not settle for the defendant. Disputing ownership of the scales would have to transfer data. And then from the time when the contracts under the Commercial Code, Section 458, the plaintiff assignee scale disputes come from. Would have disputed the ownership of the scales. regardless of whether the plaintiff was aware that information. Buy Scales dispute from the defendant and has not paid the price or not. Scales of the defendant is not disputing it.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7531/2543.
Lease cars between defendants 1 and accused 2, serves to camouflage the contract of sale must be provision in the law dealing comes into force the defendant to a just delivered the car disputes by not delivering the document in the registration of the defendant, 2. show that a defendant does not intend to transfer until the second defendant to pay full price. When the defendant. 2 are not comprehensive settlement. Ownership is not vested in the defendant, the plaintiff purchased two vehicles from the defendants dispute that 2 is not proprietary. And no authority to sue a defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5591/2543.
Contract, it says permitting sale conditions the agreement in article 1 that the sale agreement to sell and purchase agreement to buy a car, to resolve the price 1,235,680 baht in contracts this will purchase payment to the. it sold 70,000 baht, pending another 1,165,680 baht of the contract that will pay to the person selling a period every month period at 48,570 baht at the offices of the sale be completed within 24 months and 5. This agreement states that the text of the agreement will be valid for the property vested in the people who will buy when it purchased to comply with all the messages in this agreement. And who will sell the right to terminate the agreement and called upon people to buy the property does not comply with this agreement, whether any one or any of that agreement, the agreement is conditional. N / A indicates that a lease that property owners take the property out for rent and pledged to sell the property or the property will be vested right to the lessee. The terms of the lease to the amounts as much as this time, the clause 9 which states that if the purchase failed to pay price as the period is the period which, etc. The purchase lets assume this Agreement shall be deemed immediately from the agenda. The notice is not required and have the right to remove the vehicle without having to buy back the refund paid to buy it. A voluntary agreement of the parties and to protect the interests of the seller not to damage than necessary only when a buyer breach of contract. Find the contracts on the condition turns out not to lease.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4503/2540.
The right to lease the property to a type of trade deals under contract rights under the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is a final contract completion. Yes, by agreement with Constraint after not because the plaintiff and the defendant buyer who has agreed to sell the name and agreed to sell the right to terminate the purchase agreement is completed. The defendant, who sold the lease rights to deliver the right of lease to the plaintiff, the plaintiff buyer and the buyer has to pay royalties under the contract to the defendant and the seller. After the contracts. The defendant sold a car to deliver the objects of rights under the lease to the plaintiff buyer the right to occupy and exploit the rights of the lease then.
Which is the Section 406 P.wi.po. Lapamicyrnadg under which that person must be on the property because of another person without payment information to the legal claims. But the case when the defendant has the right contracts and hire-purchase contract disputes legally. When the defendant sold the rights to the plaintiff. Proceeds from sale of property rights, which acquired lawfully. If the defendant is not a Lapamicyrnadg do not have a refund to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is the party that failed to pay the lease payments to the company and cause the defendant to hire a contract with the leasing company based on damage to track car in order to deliver the company to hire. But which the plaintiff's unilateral mistake. The plaintiff, a defendant does not consider the parties voluntarily terminate the lease agreement to the same rights as from the date of the defendant seized the bus back from the plaintiff disputes.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6351/2537.
Contracts specify that the tractor. Ownership of the property still belongs to the seller until the buyer to the seller until payment is complete. As ownership of the tractor is not transferred to the buyer until the buyer to pay full price then.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2489/2536.
Contract dispute Car conditions indicate that the disputed ownership of the vehicle is not transferred to the buyer. Until full payment for the period specified in the contract shall apply to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 and the contract states that if the buyer failed to pay the price period. Sellers have the right to dispute and possession of vehicle by public auction shall be entitled to, and when sold was not enough money. Buyers willing to pay money that is lacking.
Section 459 if the contract terms or forced to Terms of time. That he has not transferred ownership of the property until the conditions are or are due Terms of time that
Section 460 in the sale of property which does not set down on the course. You do not transfer the title until the means or the Weights and Measures, or selection, or by other means. To indicate the. Of course, that property is already out.
The purchase of only one property. If the seller will still have the Weights and Measures or the other or do anything in relation to the property to be aware of. Of course, the price of such property. You of the title. Not transferred to the buyer or until it has done already.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5309/2551.
Plaintiff's car from the defendant disputes. Settle some dispute and authorized vehicle to occupy and use. Agreement that the plaintiff must pay for some of the remaining defendants within the two years it will transfer the vehicle registration to the name dispute plaintiff. As long as the plaintiff to pay the rest, the defendant did not complete within two years the defendant will not transfer the vehicle registration as a plaintiff. Is taken of terms of trade acts as a relay shall be Effect until the plaintiff to pay the remaining debt to the defendant to complete ownership of the car. Dispute is not transferred to the buyer as soon as the plaintiff disputes the same car. Car sale agreement is a trade dispute is not done strictly prohibited.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4643/2551.
Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, provided that if payments under the contract is not finished machinery and equipment specified in the contract remain the property of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to return in good condition at any time. The agreement provided for transfer by Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 agreement when the defendant guilty. The plaintiff terminated the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant would return to the original position. Defendant to return machine equipped with hot water to the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit to force the defendant to return machine equipped with hot water if the night is not the price. It is the case, the plaintiff, as owner of the property monitoring took the property back from the defendant. No right to take under Section 1336, with no limitation
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2496/2551.
While the petitioner and the defendant's car central contracts each defendant has not delivered car Parts of the middle to the petitioner and the petitioner to hold settlement money of 50,000 baht by the defendant's car will be delivered to the petitioner in the middle date of receipt of payment for the rest of it is dealing with conditions under the contract Civil Code Section 459 of the middle car ownership is not transferred until the petitioner will pay the same price and transfer of the petitioner is not a registered owner of the car a true center. No right to apply for the return of the stolen property car Criminal Law Section 36.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1786/2551.
Trade between the plaintiff and the defendant leaves the ship with the message that Products listed above. Although it had been delivered to the buyer. It is also a property of the seller until the buyer has completed payment slip though the product will not appear signature of the sender and the receiver. But that document is a copy photos directly to the end of the document which the plaintiff said in the lawsuit. Complaint, and attest to the text in the document and then expressly stated for the original loss lost by the defendant to acknowledge Products purchased from the plaintiff as such documents are real. And does not attest to refuse to agree with arguments that do not know the text in that document, so listen to that contract between the plaintiff and the defendant had ownership of the property purchase conditions. Sales are not transferred unless the conditions are as follows: Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459, when the plaintiff has not received payment for goods. Ownership of the property is still dealing with the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1013/2550.
Contract sales unit between the seller and the plaintiff buyer says sales (units) with parking numbers from 538 to 540, 547 to 549 of the Building parking 5 vehicles to the plaintiff as money 10,014,333 U.S. holds that the plaintiff has title. In units with parking from now on be. Contracts traded, followed Civil and Commercial Code, Section 458, which the plaintiff as owner of the property. Shall be entitled to various as provided in Section 1336.
Parking in the condominium by the state shall hold the other assets that are intended to be used. Or for the mutual benefit for the co-owners. It is the common property. Condominium Act BE 2522, Section 4, but when an agreement to sell units that plaintiff purchased the property to indicate that sales (units) with parking Parking as set forth shall become the property of the plaintiff with units and is not considered "common property" of the condominium anymore, but is "property of the person" of the plaintiff and defendant, a condominium is not to issue regulations or actions. any parking on that later as a convenience to the plaintiff's loss. Who is the owner of the property. Although plaintiff's unpaid common expenses exceeding 6 months, the defendant also like to admonish another separate case. When the defendant to issue regulations prohibiting the plaintiff to the car parked in the car park under an agreement to sell even the plaintiff must be parked in the car to another place. And to pay costs up unnecessarily. Considered as a functional property rights hinder the plaintiff's agreement to sell units. Can be considered an intentional act in violation of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has been damaged. Defendant must pay damages to the plaintiff.
Condominium Act BE 2522, Section 33 states that condominium is intended to manage and maintain common property and shall have the authority to act for the benefit of any such purpose. The defendant to issue regulations that would require cars to park in the car park. Defendant must receive a sticker from the car prior to the defendant, which the management and Custody is the central car park to the same rules. The defendant shall be made as set forth in the Charter to obtain a sticker. Parking in the car park, but any one of the defendants stipulated in Article 2 that co-owner who has the right to obtain a sticker in accordance with Article 1 shall not hold more than 6 months pay public can not be done. Because of the unpaid monthly maintenance fee is a debt that must be impeccable execution under the law to issue regulations as this is an avoidance to not exercise claim to be intended to coerce out the plaintiff will ensure compliance. regulation of the defendant is. Not in compliance with its intention to enforce the law. Condominium Act BE 2522, can not force the plaintiff to remove.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6337/2550.
Rights under the law are the same style. When in any manner that shall be used features. Be carried out in the provisions on transfer of ownership to the buyer or not in the Civil and Commercial trade is the right diagnosis of the vendor incurred but not insurance. The rights of the insured arising, but the policy will only have to do is go under the policy. When the plaintiff to 1 (the seller) and defendant (insurer) has agreed to all types of insurance that may arise throughout the duration of the carrier to transport goods from origin to destination, Bangkok USA Conditional insurance coverage ends when the plaintiff is not the first carrier to deliver goods to the trading conditions, F. Oh. Crumble, but the protection is always a carrier to transport from origin to destination, Bangkok USA When the goods are lost in transit. The defendant insurer liable for compensation under the contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4767/2549.
Contract disputes indicates that car ownership in the car will fall to the buyer when the price paid in several installments as set out fully and then considered the contract terms. This title is not transferred to the buyer. Until the buyer paid full price. Trading on the condition that the property is transferred in the future together. Sellers may have owned property in the future be issued in advance. And is a function of the seller to transfer the property to the buyer. When the buyer's conditions and operations. Sellers do not need a title to the property at the time the contracts so that the plaintiff and the defendant made the contract of sale car ownership in the property dispute by the parties later on. Even when contracts are not plaintiff's ownership or title to property is not complete. Contract, it has become enforceable. The defendant refused to pay for breach of contract to the plaintiff and caused the plaintiff to terminate the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the power.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5591/2543.
Contract, it says permitting sale conditions the agreement in article 1 that the sale agreement to sell and purchase agreement to buy a car, to resolve the price 1,235,680 baht in contracts this will purchase payment to the. it sold 70,000 baht, pending another 1,165,680 baht of the contract that will pay to the person selling a period every month period at 48,570 baht at the offices of the sale be completed within 24 months and 5. This agreement states that the text of the agreement will be valid for the property vested in the people who will buy when it purchased to comply with all the messages in this agreement. And who will sell the right to terminate the agreement and called upon people to buy the property does not comply with this agreement, whether any one or any of that agreement, the agreement is conditional. N / A indicates that a lease that property owners take the property out for rent and pledged to sell the property or the property will be vested right to the lessee. The terms of the lease to the amounts as much as this time, the clause 9 which states that if the purchase failed to pay price as the period is the period which, etc. The purchase lets assume this Agreement shall be deemed immediately from the agenda. The notice is not required and have the right to remove the vehicle without having to buy back the refund paid to buy it. A voluntary agreement of the parties and to protect the interests of the seller not to damage than necessary only when a buyer breach of contract. Find the contracts on the condition turns out not to lease.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1007/2543.
Petitioner made a contract to acquire vehicles of medium from the sale of the vehicle installment contracts. The agreement requires the petitioner to pay for vehicles of the middle part of the contract date. The remaining repayment period including 24 motorcycles settlement has been reached when the seller had to be transferred. Contract vehicles is the central contract conditions. When it appears that before the civil court ruled to confiscate the vehicles of the middle. Petitioner had not paid the last installment to the seller. Ownership of the motorcycle is still in the middle of the sale, although subsequently the Court of First Instance ruled to confiscate vehicles of any medium. However, vehicles of the mid court ruled to confiscate the land is vested in the Court that if the forfeiture of the final medium. But while the Court to confiscate the property in dispute is not the owner of the property of the medium still has the power to the alienation of their property. When it appears that the District Court has ruled to confiscate the vehicles of the middle. A party without any appeal petition. Court of First Instance that it will be possible only when the duration of the appeal petition is terminated, as provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure Section 147, paragraph two contains the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 15, so before the Court of First Instance that. will be final. The seller of motorcycle ownership in the middle can also be transferred in the middle of the motorcycle to the petitioner. When the petitioner has the final settlement before the Court of First Instance to confiscate vehicles of medium is most The seller can transfer to the petitioner. And held that the petitioner is the owner of the real center of a motorcycle has the right to apply for the return of the Central. When the petitioner and the seller, the original owner of the motorcycle while the middle is used to retain the offender is not responsible for the offense. It should return to the vehicles of the mid-barker
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2489/2536.
Contract dispute Car conditions indicate that the disputed ownership of the vehicle is not transferred to the buyer. Until full payment for the period specified in the contract shall come into force under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 and the contract states that if the buyer failed to pay the price period. Sellers have the right to dispute and possession of vehicle by public auction shall be entitled to, and when sold was not enough money. Buyers willing to pay money that is lacking. When the buyer failed to pay the price and the seller took the vehicle auction disputes under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 470, and 471 had no money and then 55,260 more U.S. buyer and guarantor is liable. It is considered a cash settlement price of the car is missing. And the amount of the contract does not require any of the damages it is not a penalty. Contract No. 6 in the second paragraph states that if the buyer failed various payment schedules specified in the contract. Or failed to pay any debt under this Agreement, the buyer agrees to pay interest to the vendor rate 15 percent per year, amounting to 55,260 baht, a silver price of cars disputes absent is the annuity various stimuli from the user. Buy failed to pay the plaintiff the period specified in the contract the seller had the right to charge interest rate of 15 percent per year from the purchase contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3728/2535.
Contract which states that car. Proprietary trading vehicles will not be transferred to the buyer until the buyer paid full price causes the cash amount specified in the contract before then. The contract terms. Forced together by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459, when the parties agreed purchase price of the course, and a number of plaintiffs who sold to the defendant to pay a buyer bids on a contract of hire purchase price, then the rest of the period. And an agreement that if the buyer defaulted payment for any period. Allow a seller to the buyer pay for the remaining 15 per cent and interest rates all year immediately following the first defendant to be bound by the contract. When the defendant. 1 does not comply with the contract by late payment for the period agreed upon by the defendant that a plaintiff is liable to pay interest as well as terms and the third defendant as the guarantor, it must be jointly liable with Although it may appear to come before the settlement period in which 14 cars were traded by criminal theft did not appear to be the fault of the plaintiff or a defendant, but whether the contract specifies clearly that Duties and liabilities of the purchase will not exhaustive due to loss of motor vehicles is still a defendant is liable to pay plaintiff in full vehicle price. Because such agreements, except provisions of section 372, first paragraph of the Civil and Commercial Code. The provisions of the law relating to non-public peace or public morality. The parties would have agreed otherwise. Not void under section 114 (same).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4643/2551.
Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, provided that if payments under the contract is not finished. Machinery and equipment specified in the agreement remain the property of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to return in good condition at any time. The agreement provided for transfer by Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 agreement when the defendant guilty. The plaintiff terminated the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant would return to the original position. Defendant to return machine equipped with hot water to the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit to force the defendant to return machine equipped with hot water. If the night is not the price. It is the case, the plaintiff, as owner of the property monitoring took the property back from the defendant has no right to take under Section 1336, with no limitation
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2496/2551.
While the petitioner and the defendant contracts car center each defendant has not delivered the car central to the petitioner and the petitioner to hold settlement money of 50,000 baht by the defendant to deliver the car central to the petitioner in date of receipt of payment for the rest. There is agreement that the conditions under Commercial Code, Section 459 of the middle car ownership is not transferred until the petitioner will pay for each registration and transfer. Petitioner is not the owner of the car a true center. No right to apply for the return of the stolen property car Criminal Code Section 36.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3335/2548.
Defendant to combat just that. Plaintiff's complaint, which said the state charged with breach of contract, the defendant transferred the right hire. However, the application shall refund to the defendant to the plaintiff. Defendant could not understand what the intention that the plaintiff can not fight the case properly. Words of the defendant does not describe that. The plaintiff to sue any ambiguous or not clear how Content of the complaint or how conflicts. The reader may not understand. Treated as words that are not clear. There is no issue to be diagnosed.
Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant is a trading vehicle disputes by allowing the plaintiff the defendant who sold the installment purchase price and the condition that the plaintiff is a transfer of the installment price on completion. Contract is conditional on a transfer of ownership under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 on the trading price of real estate agreements from 500 baht to not even have evidence in writing signed by the party liable. But if a regular place or have some debt, then the parties would have the same enforcement lawsuit under Section 456 paragraph two and paragraph three When the defendant disputes the plaintiff agreed to sell cars at a price of 200,000 baht and the installment payment to the plaintiff determines that plaintiff has put 95,000 regular and part payment to the defendant. The plaintiff then sued to force the case.
The plaintiff the defendant agreed to terminate the contract dispute by trading cars voluntary mutual The plaintiff and the defendant would return to the same position as is. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 391, when the plaintiff gave the defendant back to car disputes. Defendant has the duty to return money received to the plaintiff. With interest The age of the plaintiff's claims under Section 193/30 of 10 years.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7160/2545.
Petitioner is to purchase the disputed land with buildings on the land and its service stations by the defendant. Paid to some of the cost and ownership of the contract, then traded. The petitioner is entitled to purchase a call to the defendant, who will sell the assets transferred under the contract will be traded to the petitioner by the petitioner must pay the remaining cost. Prior to the transfer of possession is possession by the defendant's right to live. Considered not that the petitioner is responsible specifically for the Code of Civil Procedure Section 296 quarter (3) the petitioner is the subject of the defendant, which is a court driven Enforcement Officer shall have the power to do so, follow Cmbeongceb issued. the sentence was. Find the right to force the case is not unlawful.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8325/2543.
Although trade disputes between the B scale. And the defendant have agreed that if the data. Buyers can not pay money to the defendant sellers. In any event, whether by allowing the defendant to accept the settlement scales back, instantly regardless of the scale is disputing any place. However, the trade balance is traded on movable property and to identify certain price, and did not appear to have an agreement to purchase it. If the buyer does not pay full price to sell property owned by the seller until the buyer to pay full price at all. Contract is not conditional, but a final contract finished even text. Will not settle for the defendant. Disputing ownership of the scales would have to transfer data. And then from the time when the contracts under the Commercial Code, Section 458, the plaintiff assignee scale disputes come from. Would have disputed the ownership of the scales. regardless of whether the plaintiff was aware that information. Buy Scales dispute from the defendant and has not paid the price or not. Scales of the defendant is not disputing it.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7531/2543.
Lease cars between defendants 1 and accused 2, serves to camouflage the contract of sale must be provision in the law dealing comes into force the defendant to a just delivered the car disputes by not delivering the document in the registration of the defendant, 2. show that a defendant does not intend to transfer until the second defendant to pay full price. When the defendant. 2 are not comprehensive settlement. Ownership is not vested in the defendant, the plaintiff purchased two vehicles from the defendants dispute that 2 is not proprietary. And no authority to sue a defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5591/2543.
Contract, it says permitting sale conditions the agreement in article 1 that the sale agreement to sell and purchase agreement to buy a car, to resolve the price 1,235,680 baht in contracts this will purchase payment to the. it sold 70,000 baht, pending another 1,165,680 baht of the contract that will pay to the person selling a period every month period at 48,570 baht at the offices of the sale be completed within 24 months and 5. This agreement states that the text of the agreement will be valid for the property vested in the people who will buy when it purchased to comply with all the messages in this agreement. And who will sell the right to terminate the agreement and called upon people to buy the property does not comply with this agreement, whether any one or any of that agreement, the agreement is conditional. N / A indicates that a lease that property owners take the property out for rent and pledged to sell the property or the property will be vested right to the lessee. The terms of the lease to the amounts as much as this time, the clause 9 which states that if the purchase failed to pay price as the period is the period which, etc. The purchase lets assume this Agreement shall be deemed immediately from the agenda. The notice is not required and have the right to remove the vehicle without having to buy back the refund paid to buy it. A voluntary agreement of the parties and to protect the interests of the seller not to damage than necessary only when a buyer breach of contract. Find the contracts on the condition turns out not to lease.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4503/2540.
The right to lease the property to a type of trade deals under contract rights under the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is a final contract completion. Yes, by agreement with Constraint after not because the plaintiff and the defendant buyer who has agreed to sell the name and agreed to sell the right to terminate the purchase agreement is completed. The defendant, who sold the lease rights to deliver the right of lease to the plaintiff, the plaintiff buyer and the buyer has to pay royalties under the contract to the defendant and the seller. After the contracts. The defendant sold a car to deliver the objects of rights under the lease to the plaintiff buyer the right to occupy and exploit the rights of the lease then.
Which is the Section 406 P.wi.po. Lapamicyrnadg under which that person must be on the property because of another person without payment information to the legal claims. But the case when the defendant has the right contracts and hire-purchase contract disputes legally. When the defendant sold the rights to the plaintiff. Proceeds from sale of property rights, which acquired lawfully. If the defendant is not a Lapamicyrnadg do not have a refund to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is the party that failed to pay the lease payments to the company and cause the defendant to hire a contract with the leasing company based on damage to track car in order to deliver the company to hire. But which the plaintiff's unilateral mistake. The plaintiff, a defendant does not consider the parties voluntarily terminate the lease agreement to the same rights as from the date of the defendant seized the bus back from the plaintiff disputes.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6351/2537.
Contracts specify that the tractor. Ownership of the property still belongs to the seller until the buyer to the seller until payment is complete. As ownership of the tractor is not transferred to the buyer until the buyer to pay full price then.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2489/2536.
Contract dispute Car conditions indicate that the disputed ownership of the vehicle is not transferred to the buyer. Until full payment for the period specified in the contract shall apply to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 and the contract states that if the buyer failed to pay the price period. Sellers have the right to dispute and possession of vehicle by public auction shall be entitled to, and when sold was not enough money. Buyers willing to pay money that is lacking.
