Section 314 of the debt, you pay a third party that is paid for time. Unless the conditions of the debt will not be opening up to third-party payment. Or is contrary to the intent which the parties listed.
A person with no interest in the settlement. The debt will be paid by the debtor is not rape.
Section 315 of the debt that Creditors or to make older person authorized to receive payment instead of creditors. Payments to persons who do not have the power to receive payment. If ratified by creditors is considered complete.
Section 316 if the payment is made to retain the right to appear as debt. You pay that debt, but when a person is completed. The payment was done in good faith.
Section 317 Unless stated in the previous section. Payments to persons who have no right to receive it. That he would complete only as far as the creditors, but the fortune grow.
Section 318 a person holding a receipt is important. You count that as a right to payment. But this he said not to use the debt if the person knew that such rights are not looking. Or do not know the right times because of their negligence.
Section 319 If the court orders a debtor to refrain from the third person to pay debt. To compel payment of their debts to creditors know that Your creditors, requesting that the confiscation is called a debtor who is the third settlement worth more to the damage he has received.
Furthermore the message, which mentioned in paragraph above to find the items in the hamper. Three of the debtor who will take recourse to its own creditors are not.
Section 320 which would force creditors to receive payment, but only partially. Or otherwise receive payment from the guilty must pay to the creditors. You may find that the force has not.
Section 321 if the creditors accept the settlement rather than something else. The settlement agreed upon. You of the debt, it shall be suspended for the following.
If order to allow the creditors enough to mind. The burden of debt accounts for one of the new creditors know that When a case is suspected. You shall assume that the debtor is in lieu of debt repayment.
If the debt with the - with the transfer - or with the endorsement of bills or debt, Pradynsincgr to suspend him over, when the bills or Pradynsincgr that money already.
Section 322 if anyone good property. Claims from third parties better. Rights or otherwise good. Instead of the debt. You will be liable to the debtor and defected to the front right is analogous to the seller.
Section 323 of the debt if the object shall be delivered to only one property. The debt that the person you have to deliver property as they should in time to deliver.
The debtor must maintain the property with care. Well, ordinary prudence should be the property of their reserves until they have delivered the property.
Section 324 when it does not have the specific intent that the debt is payable at any place know that If the property is delivered to only one. You must deliver the same at the place where the property is already in the fulfillment of a time when the payments are otherwise due him at the place where the domicile of the creditors present.
Section 325 when it has no intention of any expenses paid. Income receivable department that he should be out the cost. But if costs are increased because creditors domiciled good move. Or of any other. The creditors have done better. How much costs increase, creditors must be issued.
Section 326 payments a person who likes to receive a receipt is important. Payment from the recipient. If the debt is paid, and then completely. The repayment would like to surrender the document, which was evidence of debt. Or cancel The document is lost. If the document is lost and the person who likes to repayment of the official record Suspend debt listed in the bill or another document in a separate time.
If the debt is paid, but some good. If the document is to the right. Otherwise payable for the better. You like that, but the debtor will receive a receipt. As a guide and the official record of the down payment on the document.
Section 327 in interest. Or other payments which have Payable from time to time. If the creditors to issue a receipt for a while. Then without Reluctant to say or do anything you presumed to creditors to receive payment for the previous period by then.
If the creditors to issue a receipt for payment of principal He presumed that the creditor has already received interest.
If a document which evidences the debt and then surrender know that Persons presumed to be extinguished debt, then the end.
Section 328 if the debtor to creditors in a commitment to act for Payment is the same with multiple debts. And if the debtor is not sufficient to pay debt liabilities to strip out all know that When making payment. Debtor stating that any settlement of liabilities, it shall be the liabilities have to take off.
If the debtor does not specify You of the liabilities which are due to income, it shall be to take off first. In many cases the debts due then. Any secured creditor is the lowest income shall be the first to take off. In many cases the liability insurance is equal to the heaviest cases the debtors shall have to take off before, during several heavy debt to the debtor equal to liabilities shall be the earliest to take off first. And if many old debt is equal to all liabilities shall be strip along the high and low.
In addition, Section 329, if its debt, which Chairman. Debtor will have to pay interest and pay Cnrฤchahrnrnameneiam also know that If the payment once the other person does not have enough to take off all debts. Organized as you remove Courts fee first, then use the interest and Finally, use it to pay the debts, which President.
If the debtor be provided as specified otherwise. You do not agree that the creditors will reject any settlement.
Section 330 action on request by payment likes, then those responsible for incurred but not paid the debt, it shall be relieved from the time of payment for such action.
Section 331 if the creditors do not agree to refuse to pay debts or are unable to obtain better repayment was good. If the person placing the payment of debts to assets, which objects to the benefit payable then. They shall surely will fall. Out of this debt and you make throughout the case that the settlement is not. Can be intuitive to the right. Or unconsciously. Creditors are certainly not the fault of their own.
Section 332 if the debtor must pay the debt when the creditor is required to pay debt. Rewarded with know that You determine that the debtor will pay creditors when debt. Return it to remove the property is entitled to put that right.
Section 333 property placed the property must be placed at the office place. District to pay debt. If there is no provision of law. Or regulation only in Placed on office property. When the person who requested the court settlement will put the office property. And d from the Guardian put it up.
Makers must be aware of the notice to creditors has put the property immediately
Section 334 debtor has the right to withdraw property put it. If the debtor to withdraw. Property that you hold the property as if it were not put into it. The right to withdraw this false sense of wealth in the following cases.
(1) if the debtor shows that property placing the office give up their right to withdraw
(2) if the creditor shows to the Office will place the property that the property is taken.
(3) If the property is put to the instructions or approval of the court. And was told the office that placed the property.
Section 335 right to withdraw assets from the laws the court may order the seizure was not looking.
When filing bankruptcy on the debtor's property, you may not use the right to withdraw assets during the bankruptcy case.
Section 336 if the property which is the object of the settlement should not be put to a good or a concern that the property should the roll be detrimental to or destruction or damage is good. Upon receiving permission from a court settlement to a person who took the property from auction Then took the money, but. Paste the sale of any property. Of this article, you use all the cases. Maintain property values will cost more than it should be with
Section 337 does not allow you to take a property auction until I realized the creditors first. The free time I will abstain if the property is or may degenerate into disasters in order to delay the sale fry market.
In order to auction it. You give notice to the debtor, creditors without delay. If the notice does not ignore the bad debts are liable for the claim.
Tell aware and notice of this If not, shall be free to do so may cease also.
Time and place to be acquired. With both a descriptive manner. Of the property. You shall be published for public information and advertising.
Section 338 Courts fee in place, property, or public auction. The creditors of the parties is issued. Unless the debtor can withdraw assets placed.
Section 339 of creditor rights over the property shall be placed on hold. Lapse after ten years. Since receiving notice of placing property.
Furthermore, when the rights of creditors, and then suspended to the end. Although debtors are entitled to withdraw each property also like to remove that property.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9053/2552.
The defendant issued a check to pay debt to the plaintiff. After the bank refused to pay the check. Obligations under the contract, so do not hold to the end. The prosecutor filed criminal defendant guilty of the two. Act on the offense caused by the use of checks. Both defendants confessed to the debt repayment to the plaintiff, and then some. Obligations under the contract of employment made sure enough. When done within the age of 5 years of age would result in the interruption stopped. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit within 5 years from the date of the two defendants is not another installment debt plaintiff. Does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4618/2552.
Invoice all the plaintiff sent the defendant to include 10 No. The only obligations under invoice No. 9 and 10, only less than 2 years for loans under invoice No. 1 to 8 over two years ago, but after that the defendant used. money payment to the plaintiff some If the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff and several of the Loan proceeds, without stating that any settlement. Constitute a partial repayment of all debt. Which causes the interrupted life into all the Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) the plaintiff to sue to bring the case up to 2 years from the date of final settlement of the plaintiff's debt, so all the invoices. The No. 10 will not terminate the. And where the defendant did not specify that payment under any invoice. Need to pay debts due before the Commercial Code, Section 328, paragraph two of the plaintiff to pay the debt by the original invoice. The debt is due before To bring the debt is correct.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 607/2552.
The intention to raise the defendant disputed land, a land that has hit the Certificate of land use and delivery of debt settlement to the plaintiff without a written and registered. Authority shall not in compliance with Section 525 Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one, but consists of land disputes, but it held that the defendant bought or taking possession is not intended to take the land dispute. When the plaintiff to take possession of a land dispute then. The plaintiff would have bought or under Section 1377 and 1378, which the possession of the possessory right by law. Not acquired under the contract give The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the defendant to register as a plaintiff's transfer of land disputes.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4895/2551.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 341 of the netting was put into the rules that It is required that two people have high levels of debt are bound to each other. And must have a debt with the same object as it is an object of the same debt as the amount of money or goods to the goods. Debt and both parties must be due then. It will be set-off for each other. Defendants owe the plaintiff unpaid wages, a money debt. Although defendant may argue that The defendant did not owe the plaintiff sole. Because plaintiff's debt to return the wheel motorcycle plaintiff has not been plated. Color to any defendant. But the alleged debt is debt which is not the same object. And does not appear that the debt due depending on how If the rules are not subject to set-off. It is only where the defendant for payment with other items, as defined in Civil and Commercial Code, Section 321, which the defendant will do so only if the plaintiff, the creditors agree with the only But that was before the prosecution and the plaintiff sued the defendant after the parties agreed but debt. Can not agree. The plaintiff then withhold the wheel of the motorcycle on the plaintiff to the defendant for payment to the defendant and the defendant did not attest that Plaintiff to the defendant to agree to the wheel motorcycle appraisal settlement with the plaintiff, but how. Defendant may not take the wheel motorcycle plaintiff to withhold payment to the plaintiff's valuation is more as well. Is to address the defendant's counterclaim. But not restrict the defendant to the counterclaim filed a new case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2646/2551.
Defendant contracted loans from the plaintiff. The cards offer automatic withdrawal of the defendant to the plaintiff rely on. The plaintiff used the card to withdraw funds from bank account of the defendant regarded the plaintiff as a creditor who accepts payment something else has to pay the agreed debt. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 321, first paragraph.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6008/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 328 states that "if the debtor must be payable in a commitment to act as a debt to pay. The same debt multiple. And if the debtor is not sufficient to pay debt liabilities to strip out all Asrng upon payment. Debtor stating that any payment liabilities. It shall be the liabilities have to take off. If the debtor does not specify You that any debt due I shall have to take off for that before ... "indicates that the law entitles the debtor to indicate that any payment by one. Or do not specify any. If specified, it must be noted that payment by the desire of the debtor. When listening to the accused, check the invoice which is determined by default already said that. Any debt within the meaning of the Commercial Code, Section 328.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4742/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 653, paragraph two shall apply to the case of payment by money only. To attest that the payments by allowing the plaintiff to scoop soil and sales proceeds to pay debt. Loan obligations otherwise required by paragraph 321 Commercial Code are not subject to the provisions. Party and its witnesses in this case, the law is not the case, there was major Base written by Civil Code Procedure Section 94 defendants have so attest.
The Supreme Court 3329/2550.
3 copies of checks made payable to the defendant delivered to the plaintiff. Then the plaintiff is not to collect money Whether the defendant is ordered 3 copies of checks for payment to the plaintiff or as collateral for a debt by transferring money to. Plaintiff's account in a foreign country. The defendant shall be liable for the contents of checks to use the money to the plaintiff who checks the Commercial Code, Section 900, paragraph one, 914, 989, paragraph one, but its debt by issuing checks, the bill Debt will be suspended for the following when the spending bills and then Commercial Code, Section 321, paragraph three, when the plaintiff did not bring 3 copies of checks from the bank to charge the check. Debt for goods that did not stop existing. Although the plaintiff creditor is the party fails to check the bill itself, however, for any number of payments last of U.S. $ 1219 when the defendant has paid by deduction from the reserve funds that the defendant pay the plaintiff's representatives to a function in part. and a function to the defendant to pay the hotel has a total amount of Baht 99,177.05 hearing that the defendant payment of its debt with something else to the plaintiff under the Commercial Code and Article 321, paragraph one.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2683/2551.
Or a sales representative plaintiff. Order the defendant to contact the district known as the first defendant that the defendant bank account to transfer payment to the mother that the district did not hold the debt is legitimate because it does not pay its debts. who have the power to receive payment.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6219/2549.
In tax collection, which is a state power to force people who have already taken. The tax liability. Collection agencies must follow the correct legal within the framework of the law. As well as various rules and regulations established for this purpose. And in order to deduct the tax debt. When the law relating to taxation not provided for by the Commercial Code must be enforced, and this case would affect the rights, duties and liabilities of the taxpayer. Tax law, a public law with penalties in both civil and criminal. Order payment of withholding tax, this is a law with respect to flat calm. Hundreds of people. Although the defendant does not make it. Central Tax Court decision was itself raised by Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5) The Act established the Court of Tax and Tax Procedure Act 2528, Section 17.
During the excise tax debt. Debt penalty. Debt increase. Debt and taxes added to Interior. This insurance is equal to the excise tax debt by the heavy debt to the defendant. Because the debt burden of excise tax surcharge under the law with the money, so it must be attached and insurance deductible excise tax payments before the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 328, paragraph two
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2762/2549.
The plaintiff received a settlement from the defendant the amount of 155,505 baht, but does not specify that a defendant is to pay any debt. When a debt of 150,000 baht and 30,000 baht without the payment schedule. But the debt is guaranteed by the first two cases of debt by the guarantor only after one Building debt is debt secured creditor least When a defendant the money paid to the plaintiff. Must assume more debt after the Civil and Commercial Code shall be relieved before the second paragraph of Article 328.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1768/2549.
Both the defendant fails to pay the plaintiff's debt on August 5, 2540, but the payment date of August 8, 2540 the defendant and the two shall become in default and liable for the defaulted interest to the plaintiff. Interest between the end failed to block the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 320, 321 and 326 are eligible for the plaintiff sued the defendant to claim both interest between 6 until 8 August 2540.
Ministry of Finance has ordered to suspend operation of a capital defendant and the defendant shall not be a loan under promissory note dispute that a defendant can not pay the promissory note to the plaintiff. But not on the debt becomes impossible because the first defendant became unable to pay debts as and Commercial Code, Section 219, paragraph two, because the defendant was a Finance Ministry suspended the operation of a defendant. also to rehabilitation and may continue to operate in the future if the edit position. And operating successfully as an official policy. The suspension of operation of the defendant did not cause a defendant to a debt relief.
Defendant can not afford to pay a debt to the plaintiff because the defendant was a Ministry of Finance to suspend operations, which act as the defendant, a debtor shall not be liable under Section 205 Commercial Code to find a defendant. be called failed.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2790/2549.
Although plaintiff returned to defendant's guarantee to the Partnership district officials because of the negligence of the plaintiff. However, plaintiff did not intentionally wish to A. Partnership and the defendant from liability. Defendants will be surrendered to guarantee that a document which is the main base of one of the assumptions made in the Commercial Code, Section 327, paragraph three that the debt to be extinguished despite the end. But the presumption under the provisions of section presumption is not absolute. A. Partnership shall remain liable for damages and fines to the plaintiff. Guarantee defendants who are not liable for debt relief under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 698 conventions of the defendant may claim that banks in general. When the defendant has been surrendered by the original guarantee Limited A. The customer is in good faith. Return collateral to the defendant and the defendant is free from liability as guarantor, and then find it is not the case because no provision of law to end the suspension of guarantees. Which is why releasing the guarantor from liability. As provided in Civil and Commercial Code, particularly Section 698 to Section 701.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7548/2549.
In the loan agreement is an agreement that Defendant agrees to pay supervisors or authorities charged the monthly installment amount defendant must pay to send payments to the plaintiff as to force the defendant to pay the Judgement debt. The plaintiff must follow the styleCivil Code Procedure Region 4 Section 2 from 271 to Section 323, the law concerning the public order. The plaintiff and the defendant will agree to enforcement by the way, otherwise not. The plaintiff filed a request asking for the end of the court's order indicates that the plaintiff has the right to request a monthly payment from the authorized payment to the plaintiff to pay the debt until the loan is complete. Was allowing the plaintiff to obtain payment under the Supreme Court has the power to deduct from the proceeds of the defendant without means for setting Enforcement Office and will not need to seize or freeze assets of the defendant. Is contrary to the provisions of the law enforcement. The Supreme Court has not ordered.
Although the agreement is OK for the same payment in advance by both parties voluntarily. But the agreement related to a third party who served less money. As long as the plaintiff and the defendant has voluntarily treat each contract. The third party is charged, the defendant was sent to the plaintiff. Later, when the defendant refused to pay debts for change. Third party is not charged to send the plaintiff. Although terms such as the rights of the plaintiff and defendant to agree on how to pre-pay debt. But a third party not a party. It is not duty bound to have less money to send over to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 424/2544.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for payment of 5,575,551.53 U.S. by the plaintiff claims that the plaintiff is a debt for purchases of U.S. products to the defendant but the defendant 5,575,551.53 to the plaintiff to pay a debt of Baht 6,565,377.55, an amount that varies a lot. Plaintiff's right to require the court to prove the outstanding amount. But such arguments only make payment of the plaintiff. Can not be intuitive to the right that will certainly be of any payments. Which the plaintiff's property rights to place its debt with the amount that the plaintiff be placed at the office property. If that is the amount the plaintiff would be free from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 331, when the plaintiff chooses to follow without having to bring the case to sue Plaintiff has no authority to sue
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1555/2542.
Court of First Instance sentenced the defendant to drive them back together to hire the plaintiff in the state. Already use well. If the night is not the price instead. The defendant is not sentenced to the delivery of their car or pay the court and the Court of First Instance issued Cmbeongceb at the request of the plaintiff, which is payable under terms. Judge did not specify the place of delivery vehicles and place them with money. Case must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 324 debt under the Supreme Court to deliver a car lease obligations only one property. Must be delivered together at the place where the property is already in the fulfillment of a time when it when it appears that Debt of the defendant must deliver the hire car back occurs when the plaintiff court. Sentenced to a night when the car is in the possession of the defendant must deliver the same car at the domicile of the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1946/2542.
Defendant has the specific amount of money from 60,000 baht to be paid to the plaintiff under the Supreme Court of First Instance to place the Deposit of Property Office. From the date of October 21, 2529, but plaintiff denied receiving any such money to pay debts because that is not valid Even later, the Court of Appeal has ruled the most to the defendant to pay interest rate of 19 percent per annum on the amount of Baht 60,000 from the date of October 23, 2529, which time after the defendant place the property until the defendant to pay the finish to the plaintiff was under, but when the sentence The Court of Appeal did not refer to the deposit of the defendant. Put it to the Office of Property. Moreover, the Court of Appeal Judgement has been finalized by the defendant did not petition. Shall be binding on the parties under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 145, the plaintiff is entitled to take legal enforcement of property by the defendant. Such judgments.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7811/2542.
Land, the property does not appear that the legacy of A. Or do the will to raise any land disputes on land disputes, A. Death is the heritage of the district pursuant to Dryadodihrnrnam Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1599, paragraph one of the accused is the descendant and Dryadodihrnrnam of the district is entitled to the legacy of the first district in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1629 (a) have the right to inherit land from the district immediately died. And the defendant as Dryadodihrnrnam Elbow. A debt contract is trading at a district in which the plaintiff must be registered to hold the land ownership dispute with Force the defendant registered the plaintiff held the land ownership dispute with the force in which the rights of the defendant as Dryadodihrnrnam, one of which the district is co-owner of the land dispute only Not affect the rights of other heirs in the land dispute. It is not a debt on the condition of not opening up the action.
Filing of the contractual obligations are not dealing with the old law specifically. Has an age limit of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2520/2540.
Plaintiff's motion for the purpose of the court to revoke a transfer of ownership of land and buildings. But when the plaintiff has no right to sue for the revocation of the contract of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant and the plaintiff has asked the two defendants, both debt and interest of 14,560,000 baht. If the conditions of the debt does not open the box to force the payment of the price of land, including unpaid included. The plaintiff has the right to demand that the defendant, a payment by check, the price of building land owed by the plaintiff, presented in the lawsuit, and then following the Court of First Instance sentenced the defendant to a payment due to the amount specified. in check Justice is not up to the request.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4122/2540.
The defendant has brought a motorcycle to car hire, along with damages and Courts fee away Place to place the Property Central Office for payment to the plaintiff and to let the plaintiff know. I mean before the plaintiff's execution. Would hold that the defendants were operating under the verdict of the court settlement is complete. The plaintiff is not entitled to the confiscation of the defendant Enforcement Officer 2 to force the case anymore. Enforcement Officer the confiscation of the defendant. 2, the errors do not follow that the defendant struck the sentence would have Enforcement Officer. The plaintiff claims to have withdrawn to this confiscation. The plaintiff's petition that Vehicles that the defendant be placed on an office property placed deteriorated condition that the plaintiff has not been paying for. Appeal Court judges and only that. Both the defendant back together, etc. Only vehicles that motorcycles will not specify how the state and the plaintiff did not petition. Judgement of the Court of Appeal is final.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1495/2538.
The plaintiff handed the car second to the defendant without reserve the right to a penalty from the defendant under the contract even though the defendant to deliver cars delayed the plaintiff is a penalty for this reason not more when it is not registered under this car is. Private buses and have to wait for the registration of the Land Transport Department to take an appointment to inspect the damaged car from the plaintiff did not use the car does not delay the delivery vehicle. Plaintiff's car and two cars to be used in the business of the college. A. There has been agreement that the defendant is responsible for the registration of cars transformed into private buses and registered owners renamed it the defendant is responsible for all actions necessary to obtain a registration contract for the plaintiff would force the defendant to do so, but when the plaintiff required to submit the necessary documents to the defendant to complete the registration court would judge on the condition that the plaintiff sent the defendant to complete the document. The plaintiff sued the defendant delivered the car to drive two defect late in the contract is not registered under this car as a private passenger car and not registering a change of ownership to the plaintiff that the plaintiff did not sue the defendant. not deliver a second car at the residence of the plaintiff's place of delivery on the second car is not picking up the item at each other in civil court even if the Court of Appeal decision that it is not like the Supreme Court did not get diagnosed. Defendant does not own a second car if the car's actual owner refuses to register a second car transformed into private buses and registered owner of the name change, then the defendant will be forced to transfer the second car. would not have made the state debt is not open channel to transfer the defendant to the plaintiff a second vehicle enforcement can only return the car to the second plaintiff to the defendant and the defendant to the plaintiff's car rates.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5767/2537.
The plaintiff sued a house with land disputes, as part of the 5677 plot of land where the dead to give testament to the plaintiff to the defendant to two to fight it. 5677 land deed to the property of her husband who died of a Sat. To as. Instead of a rightful owner. A conflict of land raised the deed to the defendant and the plaintiff has no right 2 call from the defendant, two of the District Court determined that the issue in dispute. The plaintiff has the right to inherit property and rental value of the inheritance or lawsuit which would not only include the disputed land and home of the deceased inherit the property or with Because if the land is not disputed home of the deceased would not inherit the property of the deceased in the. The Court of Appeal ruled that the disputed land and home is not a legacy. The defendant handed to the two who died without a testament to the power to raise land and house belonging to the S. dispute to the plaintiff the plaintiff is not entitled to hire heritage and legacy. It is to be raised as an already well liked by the Court of First Instance. But the Court of Appeal ruled that the disputed land and houses which fall Marriage property S. who died were not disputing ownership of the land and house of the dead is a testament to raise their property which is not to find anyone who has not the will to do so without the deceased. Sat force the testimony in criminal cases before the conclusion that the deceased will be made in consultation with a legal aspect. At home on the property divided to heirs. A testament to the deceased party documents to the city Sat or not can not remember. When the deceased died Sat 2 let the defendant know that the will of the deceased made to the Sat plaintiff and defendant, 2 g to hear the will. Case is evident. The death raised conflict of land title documents the city Department of Buildings 5677 available to the heiress by the three S. witness consent when it was read testamentary Sat did not challenge or claim land and buildings back All three of the heiress Sat also taking the legacy of the dead by taking the legacy of another book. The evidence and circumstances of the case indicate that such waiver is intended Sat title deeds to land. 5677 with the building. To the deceased before the deceased is a testament to the city and department documents. Since a plot of land with the dead alone. Ownership. Registration is not required if ownership again. The death has disputed ownership of the land and house and raise the property of their wills to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to inherit property and inheritance according to the rent charge Costs of funeral of the dead, even the defendant, a claim that free of charge to 58,700 baht, but the defendant, 1, and counterclaim that the cost to be approximately 30,000 baht a District Court decision to charge. Funeral of death of 30,000 baht is reasonable then. For wages, attorneys and costs of litigation is concerned with managing the legacy of the deceased is a cost to benefit a share of the estate, the defendant, an action instead of heirs other must be deducted that the 300,000 baht from the estate. who died for the redemption of a mortgage, the defendant is a testament to redeem the mortgaged property by the plaintiff in the amount of 130,000 baht heir heiress Is responsible for redemption of mortgage of land by disposition For home repair disputes arising from state house building for a long time. When the repair of major renovations of 20,000 baht is a reasonable amount. The District Court determined that the plaintiff liable for the repair of 20,000 houses disputes like that, then the two defendants in their personal capacity as heir heirs under the will of a deceased person only. Applicable law of the deceased is in the possession of the defendant to 1, so the defendant 2 is not The right to withhold applicable law under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 in any way the plaintiff is the heiress to appear has not been part by the will the plaintiff would run. Lyrics by applicable law from the conflict of wills, etc. to death under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1673 plaintiff sued to force the defendant to request a transfer of ownership of land and house disputes. And delivered to the plaintiff the rent dispute. To ask the defendant. A division of land and house compensation settlement to the plaintiff by the plaintiff received compensation, even paying for the self-defendants sentenced to a transfer of disputed land and home to the plaintiff. Not judge the defendant. A split of compensation to the plaintiff. When it appears that the disputed land and houses have already been surrendered. If the debt is a condition of not opening up the execution of land and home ownership dispute that the plaintiff was. Imposed by the plaintiff was requested to obtain the land compensation dispute with the civil court house attached to the ETA. Because of circumstances which makes the transfer of disputed land and houses shall be impossible as a result, the first defendant to obtain compensation. Heritage management is the mutual benefit of the estate. The plaintiff is liable under the plaintiffs have inherited.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2159/2535.
The plaintiff purchased two cars from the Partnership disputes defendant. 1, which is the second defendant as the managing partner. To settle disputes and award automotive ago But not yet registered as a transfer of the two plaintiffs. The plaintiff, both are sued defendants three to jointly prepare, car registration and transfer of car registration dispute, both cars to the plaintiff both, but the fact hearing that the defendant 1 to 2 is a hire purchase disputes the defendant 3 defendants. 1 to 2 is not representative of the three defendants are accused of only 1 to 2 will only be liable to the plaintiff's contracts both However, both the plaintiff sued to force the defendant to request a second and prepared to transfer a car registered and listed the names of the two plaintiffs. Not to have registered for the Court to equate the intention to replace only When the car is disputing the ownership of the three defendants and a third defendant Nitiseampoanht no dispute about the car with the two plaintiffs. Therefore, the preparation and transfer of property, car registration with the object of the debt is not under the jurisdiction of a defendant to comply with the two contracts with both the plaintiff any further. Conditions of the debt does not open the box to force the request of the plaintiff both. Can not be sentenced to 2 1 that the defendant was liable for the action. Limited to a defendant's objective is to operate commercial motor vehicles and antiques of all kinds. Office Location offices are open The second defendant, the defendant is a managing partner at one of two disputed leases to sell to the plaintiff, both by car to the plaintiff's old car in exchange for the two disputes. And settle the rest. Not on a lease for use in the business of the defendant to a particular circumstance like this is characteristic of non-profit, such as regular traders exchange cars around the other to the defendant, 1 and 2, it is a merchant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1332 of that. Both the plaintiff purchased the car from the defendant disputed the 1 and 2, in good faith, even as car ownership dispute of the three defendants on both the plaintiff shall be protected by law. Without having to return to the defendant. 3 until the third defendant, the owner will pay the price. In this case, holding that the act is legally not a violation of the third defendant has no power to counterclaim for damages from both the plaintiff owned the car dispute.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3509/2542.
The defendant to that Accused home loan. Check it out to the marshland would like to join the venture and invest money held in the defendant's venture capital. And agree to cancel the loan. Check the debt is extinguished. Defendant appeals and revision that Check out the defendant has an agreement in time. Check out the check to not collect the money and the account is not picking up the item at each other and the like in the lower courts. Check the transferable securities to the Trust during Payable to the holder and all that. When the check to your billing. Will be paid by check. Terms of any conditions which ban or restrict the payment would be made, therefore it must follow. Provisions of the law underlines the defendant in the black box date Such action does not authorize the provisions of the law that has made such statements as a result find it either. To check that under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 899 determines that the defendant not to reissue the checks were issued when the plaintiff has been checked and put into the account. Plaintiff or the bank staff is. The check was dated the last paragraph of Article 910, Section 898 plaintiffs to endorse checks signature holder. Must be considered. Insurance or the Aval payable under Section 921 of the 989 by operation of law, not Aval Aval under section 939 does not require a written statement indicating that Aval is a plaintiff liable B. Section 940 paragraph one and to pay debt to the liability towards payment of bills by B. This is not to let the plaintiff know the defendant and will constitute a debt. The rape receivables.
The Supreme Court 2086 - 2087/2550.
Land sale contract that the plaintiff and the defendant made the buyer deposits the sale is not configured to Sinatn. The defendant shall be entitled to redeem the land sale with the price of sale with the Commercial Code, Section 499, first paragraph, if the defendant has redeemed the land sale money within the contract. But the plaintiff did not consent to ransom. The defendant shall be entitled to redeem the land sale by bringing money to the Office of Property Sinatn place to place within redeem the property forfeited property is placed withdraw. This case held that the sale of land vested in the defendant's property from the time the defendant has put the property, which Sinatn Commercial Code, Section 492, first paragraph.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1713/2543.
When the debtor for payment by operating well Creditors do not accept payment to a debtor is relieved not to have damaged the law allows the property settlement, which placed object debt for the benefit of creditors. When placing property and then would break away from debt. The debtor shall not be liable to creditors for another under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 334 and 335 show that the debtor only has the right to withdraw property placed upon the defendant to 2 deposit for payment to the plaintiff in another case one and not the right to withdraw assets. In other cases, creditors will seize or freeze the money to put the defendant to two other debt and when the attachment is not prohibited by law. Considered that the attachment is not money, not selling. Fees are not called Enforcement Officer.
Claim that the freeze did not like and ask them to withdraw the attachment. The case is requested to relieve the suffering can not be calculated as price money.
The Supreme Court 2949 - 2951/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant describe the floor area of MBK Center. Plaintiff's first floor to a new part. Sat, and last year. Lease laws are not the plaintiff is aware of the tenant to lease all three cases the plaintiff is why all three cases the tenant may not be intuitive to the rights of creditors have the right to rent that is not true. the money to pay rent to the plaintiff, but to put that property placing central office under the Legal Execution Department to pay the lenders under the actual sentence the plaintiff to obtain the money but can not get the money. The plaintiff did not receive the rent is directly caused by the defendant has no right to lease the defendant's actions violate the rights of the plaintiff's claim that the residents essentially alleging that the plaintiff can not receive tenants rent money to put all three cases are caused by the tenant to lease all three cases the plaintiff has not paid the rent but the rent money to place at the office by placing a central place property, provided that payment. True to creditors under the Supreme Court a final act of the tenant three cases are not the actions of the defendant and the plaintiff can not get money because the rent was a condition that all three cases the tenant is not defined. Because the defendant objected to the claim of the plaintiff in any way the defendant had entered into agreements with three more tenants before putting the property violated the defendant did not dispute the right of the plaintiff, or which causes the plaintiff paid the rent from the office place. Property Central is not the plaintiff has no authority to sue the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6070/2539.
The defendant used the rent money to put into place at the Office of Property by the terms of payment shall be payable as a final court order to show that It is so beneficial to both the plaintiff or its creditors, the district is entitled to rent may not be true that the defendant was indeed intuitive. The deposit of the defendant is a reason like not the fault of the defendant and the defendant has the right to place the property to pay rent due to the defendant was free from debt lease under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 331.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8253/2538.
Sub-contract the defendant from the plaintiff disputed area. The defendant has the responsibility to pay rent, sublet, but the plaintiff A. The owner and the lessor was still a defendant the right to demand rent from tenants and A. Chang directly informed the defendant made. their lease with. They claim that has terminated the lease to the lessee, then the original. Failure to comply will be filed until the defendant drove to a contract with the company. Tue under the circumstances. Defendant would not know that any party has the right better. The defendant used the rent money that has been demand from the plaintiff and its district offices to put that property placing holds that the defendant can not be intuitive to know the right or indeed by creditors is not the fault of the defendant. When the defendant did not know who is right is better. Therefore, the defendant must be defined. Conditions that. The person having the right to real disputes in the rental lease is a recipient money is placed. Not a condition to which the plaintiff can not receive money for deposit with the defendant's like the Civil and Commercial Code and Section 331.
The Supreme Court 3785 - 3789/2538.
The plaintiff raised the claim that the principle of housing is charged with five tenants and the rent money to put that property placing central office. Legal Execution Department, the plaintiff can not get money to rent a place. Claims of the plaintiff the cause of the tenants and five rental contract with the plaintiff then fails to pay rent to the amount the rent to place at the office put property central condition for payment to creditors true the sentence is final. This is the work of tenants and five non-action of the defendant. The plaintiff can not receive money for rent because a tenant policy is that all five cases defined. Not because the defendant to challenge the claim of the plaintiff's rent in any way. The defendant has entered into lease with the tenant before placing five property. Defendant has not violated or disputed right to the plaintiff. Which causes the plaintiff paid the rent from the central office does not place the property. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1288/2537.
Lease the defendant, including kitchen equipment used in commercial food business from the plaintiff. Later, the land owner has driven the plaintiff to sue. Defendant and the related issue of the rent by claiming that Land and buildings leased to their own. Defendant has to take place at the office rental property central place because you can not discerning the true rights of creditors. Or who are eligible for repayment. Even later, Chief Legal Execution Department to order the defendant to refund the rent. The opinion that Officers should not be placed defendant property was recovered and placed the case in civil court to sue the owner of the land drive. And the lawsuit was withdrawn landowners sue The agreement allows landowners to pay compensation to the plaintiff the right to lease the property involved and the defendant agree to all of the leased land as the owner. Not impressed both the civil and criminal cases against each other in terms of withdrawal of the plaintiff and the defendant sued in a lawsuit filed expel it. If a compromise agreement, it is considered a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant dispute in this case did not find it. Because there is no agreement whatsoever between the plaintiff and the defendant in this case indicates that the intention to dispute in this case complete with suspension or waiver to allow different parties to the case when the plaintiff sued the defendant defaulted on payment of rent. break the contract damages, the defendant must use per se that Defendant and the plaintiff has the right to breach of contract claim for damages or not. When the defendant put the money to rent office property place because landowners are allegedly in violation of the lease and sue fighter and later be put to the Court of First Instance in cases such as this would not constitute a default. pay the rent, which will cause the lease break for no.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 515/2535.
Putting assets to the court about the work of a court adjudication is not a legal action announced by the National Executive Council No. 216, despite the royal decree number 21, the Office of Property Central Place is a government agency. Of the Legal Execution Department Ministry of Justice Placing property is still a job. Relating to the Judiciary. According to the Ministry of Justice with the immediate wealth. Property Office, place center. Department of Legal Execution Clause 2 requires that the debtor or third parties may be placing the Office of Property Sub place in the event. Following ... (5) Where under the provisions of other laws (6) if the command Court under the provisions of law, such as last year. Civil code Procedure Section 264, so the deposit to the court for compensation according to the National Executive Council No. 295, first paragraph, Article 67 would mean the deposit of compensation to the Office. Central Department of Legal Execution and Deposit of Property, which defendant surrendered to authorities. Property to compensation that the plaintiff did not accept to put the central office put the property constitute a deposit of compensation paid to the court and the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a compensation that the plaintiff.
A person with no interest in the settlement. The debt will be paid by the debtor is not rape.
Section 315 of the debt that Creditors or to make older person authorized to receive payment instead of creditors. Payments to persons who do not have the power to receive payment. If ratified by creditors is considered complete.
Section 316 if the payment is made to retain the right to appear as debt. You pay that debt, but when a person is completed. The payment was done in good faith.
Section 317 Unless stated in the previous section. Payments to persons who have no right to receive it. That he would complete only as far as the creditors, but the fortune grow.
Section 318 a person holding a receipt is important. You count that as a right to payment. But this he said not to use the debt if the person knew that such rights are not looking. Or do not know the right times because of their negligence.
Section 319 If the court orders a debtor to refrain from the third person to pay debt. To compel payment of their debts to creditors know that Your creditors, requesting that the confiscation is called a debtor who is the third settlement worth more to the damage he has received.
Furthermore the message, which mentioned in paragraph above to find the items in the hamper. Three of the debtor who will take recourse to its own creditors are not.
Section 320 which would force creditors to receive payment, but only partially. Or otherwise receive payment from the guilty must pay to the creditors. You may find that the force has not.
Section 321 if the creditors accept the settlement rather than something else. The settlement agreed upon. You of the debt, it shall be suspended for the following.
If order to allow the creditors enough to mind. The burden of debt accounts for one of the new creditors know that When a case is suspected. You shall assume that the debtor is in lieu of debt repayment.
If the debt with the - with the transfer - or with the endorsement of bills or debt, Pradynsincgr to suspend him over, when the bills or Pradynsincgr that money already.
Section 322 if anyone good property. Claims from third parties better. Rights or otherwise good. Instead of the debt. You will be liable to the debtor and defected to the front right is analogous to the seller.
Section 323 of the debt if the object shall be delivered to only one property. The debt that the person you have to deliver property as they should in time to deliver.
The debtor must maintain the property with care. Well, ordinary prudence should be the property of their reserves until they have delivered the property.
Section 324 when it does not have the specific intent that the debt is payable at any place know that If the property is delivered to only one. You must deliver the same at the place where the property is already in the fulfillment of a time when the payments are otherwise due him at the place where the domicile of the creditors present.
Section 325 when it has no intention of any expenses paid. Income receivable department that he should be out the cost. But if costs are increased because creditors domiciled good move. Or of any other. The creditors have done better. How much costs increase, creditors must be issued.
Section 326 payments a person who likes to receive a receipt is important. Payment from the recipient. If the debt is paid, and then completely. The repayment would like to surrender the document, which was evidence of debt. Or cancel The document is lost. If the document is lost and the person who likes to repayment of the official record Suspend debt listed in the bill or another document in a separate time.
If the debt is paid, but some good. If the document is to the right. Otherwise payable for the better. You like that, but the debtor will receive a receipt. As a guide and the official record of the down payment on the document.
Section 327 in interest. Or other payments which have Payable from time to time. If the creditors to issue a receipt for a while. Then without Reluctant to say or do anything you presumed to creditors to receive payment for the previous period by then.
If the creditors to issue a receipt for payment of principal He presumed that the creditor has already received interest.
If a document which evidences the debt and then surrender know that Persons presumed to be extinguished debt, then the end.
Section 328 if the debtor to creditors in a commitment to act for Payment is the same with multiple debts. And if the debtor is not sufficient to pay debt liabilities to strip out all know that When making payment. Debtor stating that any settlement of liabilities, it shall be the liabilities have to take off.
If the debtor does not specify You of the liabilities which are due to income, it shall be to take off first. In many cases the debts due then. Any secured creditor is the lowest income shall be the first to take off. In many cases the liability insurance is equal to the heaviest cases the debtors shall have to take off before, during several heavy debt to the debtor equal to liabilities shall be the earliest to take off first. And if many old debt is equal to all liabilities shall be strip along the high and low.
In addition, Section 329, if its debt, which Chairman. Debtor will have to pay interest and pay Cnrฤchahrnrnameneiam also know that If the payment once the other person does not have enough to take off all debts. Organized as you remove Courts fee first, then use the interest and Finally, use it to pay the debts, which President.
If the debtor be provided as specified otherwise. You do not agree that the creditors will reject any settlement.
Section 330 action on request by payment likes, then those responsible for incurred but not paid the debt, it shall be relieved from the time of payment for such action.
Section 331 if the creditors do not agree to refuse to pay debts or are unable to obtain better repayment was good. If the person placing the payment of debts to assets, which objects to the benefit payable then. They shall surely will fall. Out of this debt and you make throughout the case that the settlement is not. Can be intuitive to the right. Or unconsciously. Creditors are certainly not the fault of their own.
Section 332 if the debtor must pay the debt when the creditor is required to pay debt. Rewarded with know that You determine that the debtor will pay creditors when debt. Return it to remove the property is entitled to put that right.
Section 333 property placed the property must be placed at the office place. District to pay debt. If there is no provision of law. Or regulation only in Placed on office property. When the person who requested the court settlement will put the office property. And d from the Guardian put it up.
Makers must be aware of the notice to creditors has put the property immediately
Section 334 debtor has the right to withdraw property put it. If the debtor to withdraw. Property that you hold the property as if it were not put into it. The right to withdraw this false sense of wealth in the following cases.
(1) if the debtor shows that property placing the office give up their right to withdraw
(2) if the creditor shows to the Office will place the property that the property is taken.
(3) If the property is put to the instructions or approval of the court. And was told the office that placed the property.
Section 335 right to withdraw assets from the laws the court may order the seizure was not looking.
When filing bankruptcy on the debtor's property, you may not use the right to withdraw assets during the bankruptcy case.
Section 336 if the property which is the object of the settlement should not be put to a good or a concern that the property should the roll be detrimental to or destruction or damage is good. Upon receiving permission from a court settlement to a person who took the property from auction Then took the money, but. Paste the sale of any property. Of this article, you use all the cases. Maintain property values will cost more than it should be with
Section 337 does not allow you to take a property auction until I realized the creditors first. The free time I will abstain if the property is or may degenerate into disasters in order to delay the sale fry market.
In order to auction it. You give notice to the debtor, creditors without delay. If the notice does not ignore the bad debts are liable for the claim.
Tell aware and notice of this If not, shall be free to do so may cease also.
Time and place to be acquired. With both a descriptive manner. Of the property. You shall be published for public information and advertising.
Section 338 Courts fee in place, property, or public auction. The creditors of the parties is issued. Unless the debtor can withdraw assets placed.
Section 339 of creditor rights over the property shall be placed on hold. Lapse after ten years. Since receiving notice of placing property.
Furthermore, when the rights of creditors, and then suspended to the end. Although debtors are entitled to withdraw each property also like to remove that property.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9053/2552.
The defendant issued a check to pay debt to the plaintiff. After the bank refused to pay the check. Obligations under the contract, so do not hold to the end. The prosecutor filed criminal defendant guilty of the two. Act on the offense caused by the use of checks. Both defendants confessed to the debt repayment to the plaintiff, and then some. Obligations under the contract of employment made sure enough. When done within the age of 5 years of age would result in the interruption stopped. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit within 5 years from the date of the two defendants is not another installment debt plaintiff. Does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4618/2552.
Invoice all the plaintiff sent the defendant to include 10 No. The only obligations under invoice No. 9 and 10, only less than 2 years for loans under invoice No. 1 to 8 over two years ago, but after that the defendant used. money payment to the plaintiff some If the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff and several of the Loan proceeds, without stating that any settlement. Constitute a partial repayment of all debt. Which causes the interrupted life into all the Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) the plaintiff to sue to bring the case up to 2 years from the date of final settlement of the plaintiff's debt, so all the invoices. The No. 10 will not terminate the. And where the defendant did not specify that payment under any invoice. Need to pay debts due before the Commercial Code, Section 328, paragraph two of the plaintiff to pay the debt by the original invoice. The debt is due before To bring the debt is correct.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 607/2552.
The intention to raise the defendant disputed land, a land that has hit the Certificate of land use and delivery of debt settlement to the plaintiff without a written and registered. Authority shall not in compliance with Section 525 Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one, but consists of land disputes, but it held that the defendant bought or taking possession is not intended to take the land dispute. When the plaintiff to take possession of a land dispute then. The plaintiff would have bought or under Section 1377 and 1378, which the possession of the possessory right by law. Not acquired under the contract give The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the defendant to register as a plaintiff's transfer of land disputes.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4895/2551.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 341 of the netting was put into the rules that It is required that two people have high levels of debt are bound to each other. And must have a debt with the same object as it is an object of the same debt as the amount of money or goods to the goods. Debt and both parties must be due then. It will be set-off for each other. Defendants owe the plaintiff unpaid wages, a money debt. Although defendant may argue that The defendant did not owe the plaintiff sole. Because plaintiff's debt to return the wheel motorcycle plaintiff has not been plated. Color to any defendant. But the alleged debt is debt which is not the same object. And does not appear that the debt due depending on how If the rules are not subject to set-off. It is only where the defendant for payment with other items, as defined in Civil and Commercial Code, Section 321, which the defendant will do so only if the plaintiff, the creditors agree with the only But that was before the prosecution and the plaintiff sued the defendant after the parties agreed but debt. Can not agree. The plaintiff then withhold the wheel of the motorcycle on the plaintiff to the defendant for payment to the defendant and the defendant did not attest that Plaintiff to the defendant to agree to the wheel motorcycle appraisal settlement with the plaintiff, but how. Defendant may not take the wheel motorcycle plaintiff to withhold payment to the plaintiff's valuation is more as well. Is to address the defendant's counterclaim. But not restrict the defendant to the counterclaim filed a new case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2646/2551.
Defendant contracted loans from the plaintiff. The cards offer automatic withdrawal of the defendant to the plaintiff rely on. The plaintiff used the card to withdraw funds from bank account of the defendant regarded the plaintiff as a creditor who accepts payment something else has to pay the agreed debt. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 321, first paragraph.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6008/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 328 states that "if the debtor must be payable in a commitment to act as a debt to pay. The same debt multiple. And if the debtor is not sufficient to pay debt liabilities to strip out all Asrng upon payment. Debtor stating that any payment liabilities. It shall be the liabilities have to take off. If the debtor does not specify You that any debt due I shall have to take off for that before ... "indicates that the law entitles the debtor to indicate that any payment by one. Or do not specify any. If specified, it must be noted that payment by the desire of the debtor. When listening to the accused, check the invoice which is determined by default already said that. Any debt within the meaning of the Commercial Code, Section 328.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4742/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 653, paragraph two shall apply to the case of payment by money only. To attest that the payments by allowing the plaintiff to scoop soil and sales proceeds to pay debt. Loan obligations otherwise required by paragraph 321 Commercial Code are not subject to the provisions. Party and its witnesses in this case, the law is not the case, there was major Base written by Civil Code Procedure Section 94 defendants have so attest.
The Supreme Court 3329/2550.
3 copies of checks made payable to the defendant delivered to the plaintiff. Then the plaintiff is not to collect money Whether the defendant is ordered 3 copies of checks for payment to the plaintiff or as collateral for a debt by transferring money to. Plaintiff's account in a foreign country. The defendant shall be liable for the contents of checks to use the money to the plaintiff who checks the Commercial Code, Section 900, paragraph one, 914, 989, paragraph one, but its debt by issuing checks, the bill Debt will be suspended for the following when the spending bills and then Commercial Code, Section 321, paragraph three, when the plaintiff did not bring 3 copies of checks from the bank to charge the check. Debt for goods that did not stop existing. Although the plaintiff creditor is the party fails to check the bill itself, however, for any number of payments last of U.S. $ 1219 when the defendant has paid by deduction from the reserve funds that the defendant pay the plaintiff's representatives to a function in part. and a function to the defendant to pay the hotel has a total amount of Baht 99,177.05 hearing that the defendant payment of its debt with something else to the plaintiff under the Commercial Code and Article 321, paragraph one.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2683/2551.
Or a sales representative plaintiff. Order the defendant to contact the district known as the first defendant that the defendant bank account to transfer payment to the mother that the district did not hold the debt is legitimate because it does not pay its debts. who have the power to receive payment.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6219/2549.
In tax collection, which is a state power to force people who have already taken. The tax liability. Collection agencies must follow the correct legal within the framework of the law. As well as various rules and regulations established for this purpose. And in order to deduct the tax debt. When the law relating to taxation not provided for by the Commercial Code must be enforced, and this case would affect the rights, duties and liabilities of the taxpayer. Tax law, a public law with penalties in both civil and criminal. Order payment of withholding tax, this is a law with respect to flat calm. Hundreds of people. Although the defendant does not make it. Central Tax Court decision was itself raised by Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5) The Act established the Court of Tax and Tax Procedure Act 2528, Section 17.
During the excise tax debt. Debt penalty. Debt increase. Debt and taxes added to Interior. This insurance is equal to the excise tax debt by the heavy debt to the defendant. Because the debt burden of excise tax surcharge under the law with the money, so it must be attached and insurance deductible excise tax payments before the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 328, paragraph two
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2762/2549.
The plaintiff received a settlement from the defendant the amount of 155,505 baht, but does not specify that a defendant is to pay any debt. When a debt of 150,000 baht and 30,000 baht without the payment schedule. But the debt is guaranteed by the first two cases of debt by the guarantor only after one Building debt is debt secured creditor least When a defendant the money paid to the plaintiff. Must assume more debt after the Civil and Commercial Code shall be relieved before the second paragraph of Article 328.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1768/2549.
Both the defendant fails to pay the plaintiff's debt on August 5, 2540, but the payment date of August 8, 2540 the defendant and the two shall become in default and liable for the defaulted interest to the plaintiff. Interest between the end failed to block the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 320, 321 and 326 are eligible for the plaintiff sued the defendant to claim both interest between 6 until 8 August 2540.
Ministry of Finance has ordered to suspend operation of a capital defendant and the defendant shall not be a loan under promissory note dispute that a defendant can not pay the promissory note to the plaintiff. But not on the debt becomes impossible because the first defendant became unable to pay debts as and Commercial Code, Section 219, paragraph two, because the defendant was a Finance Ministry suspended the operation of a defendant. also to rehabilitation and may continue to operate in the future if the edit position. And operating successfully as an official policy. The suspension of operation of the defendant did not cause a defendant to a debt relief.
Defendant can not afford to pay a debt to the plaintiff because the defendant was a Ministry of Finance to suspend operations, which act as the defendant, a debtor shall not be liable under Section 205 Commercial Code to find a defendant. be called failed.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2790/2549.
Although plaintiff returned to defendant's guarantee to the Partnership district officials because of the negligence of the plaintiff. However, plaintiff did not intentionally wish to A. Partnership and the defendant from liability. Defendants will be surrendered to guarantee that a document which is the main base of one of the assumptions made in the Commercial Code, Section 327, paragraph three that the debt to be extinguished despite the end. But the presumption under the provisions of section presumption is not absolute. A. Partnership shall remain liable for damages and fines to the plaintiff. Guarantee defendants who are not liable for debt relief under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 698 conventions of the defendant may claim that banks in general. When the defendant has been surrendered by the original guarantee Limited A. The customer is in good faith. Return collateral to the defendant and the defendant is free from liability as guarantor, and then find it is not the case because no provision of law to end the suspension of guarantees. Which is why releasing the guarantor from liability. As provided in Civil and Commercial Code, particularly Section 698 to Section 701.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7548/2549.
In the loan agreement is an agreement that Defendant agrees to pay supervisors or authorities charged the monthly installment amount defendant must pay to send payments to the plaintiff as to force the defendant to pay the Judgement debt. The plaintiff must follow the styleCivil Code Procedure Region 4 Section 2 from 271 to Section 323, the law concerning the public order. The plaintiff and the defendant will agree to enforcement by the way, otherwise not. The plaintiff filed a request asking for the end of the court's order indicates that the plaintiff has the right to request a monthly payment from the authorized payment to the plaintiff to pay the debt until the loan is complete. Was allowing the plaintiff to obtain payment under the Supreme Court has the power to deduct from the proceeds of the defendant without means for setting Enforcement Office and will not need to seize or freeze assets of the defendant. Is contrary to the provisions of the law enforcement. The Supreme Court has not ordered.
Although the agreement is OK for the same payment in advance by both parties voluntarily. But the agreement related to a third party who served less money. As long as the plaintiff and the defendant has voluntarily treat each contract. The third party is charged, the defendant was sent to the plaintiff. Later, when the defendant refused to pay debts for change. Third party is not charged to send the plaintiff. Although terms such as the rights of the plaintiff and defendant to agree on how to pre-pay debt. But a third party not a party. It is not duty bound to have less money to send over to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 424/2544.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for payment of 5,575,551.53 U.S. by the plaintiff claims that the plaintiff is a debt for purchases of U.S. products to the defendant but the defendant 5,575,551.53 to the plaintiff to pay a debt of Baht 6,565,377.55, an amount that varies a lot. Plaintiff's right to require the court to prove the outstanding amount. But such arguments only make payment of the plaintiff. Can not be intuitive to the right that will certainly be of any payments. Which the plaintiff's property rights to place its debt with the amount that the plaintiff be placed at the office property. If that is the amount the plaintiff would be free from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 331, when the plaintiff chooses to follow without having to bring the case to sue Plaintiff has no authority to sue
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1555/2542.
Court of First Instance sentenced the defendant to drive them back together to hire the plaintiff in the state. Already use well. If the night is not the price instead. The defendant is not sentenced to the delivery of their car or pay the court and the Court of First Instance issued Cmbeongceb at the request of the plaintiff, which is payable under terms. Judge did not specify the place of delivery vehicles and place them with money. Case must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 324 debt under the Supreme Court to deliver a car lease obligations only one property. Must be delivered together at the place where the property is already in the fulfillment of a time when it when it appears that Debt of the defendant must deliver the hire car back occurs when the plaintiff court. Sentenced to a night when the car is in the possession of the defendant must deliver the same car at the domicile of the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1946/2542.
Defendant has the specific amount of money from 60,000 baht to be paid to the plaintiff under the Supreme Court of First Instance to place the Deposit of Property Office. From the date of October 21, 2529, but plaintiff denied receiving any such money to pay debts because that is not valid Even later, the Court of Appeal has ruled the most to the defendant to pay interest rate of 19 percent per annum on the amount of Baht 60,000 from the date of October 23, 2529, which time after the defendant place the property until the defendant to pay the finish to the plaintiff was under, but when the sentence The Court of Appeal did not refer to the deposit of the defendant. Put it to the Office of Property. Moreover, the Court of Appeal Judgement has been finalized by the defendant did not petition. Shall be binding on the parties under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 145, the plaintiff is entitled to take legal enforcement of property by the defendant. Such judgments.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7811/2542.
Land, the property does not appear that the legacy of A. Or do the will to raise any land disputes on land disputes, A. Death is the heritage of the district pursuant to Dryadodihrnrnam Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1599, paragraph one of the accused is the descendant and Dryadodihrnrnam of the district is entitled to the legacy of the first district in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1629 (a) have the right to inherit land from the district immediately died. And the defendant as Dryadodihrnrnam Elbow. A debt contract is trading at a district in which the plaintiff must be registered to hold the land ownership dispute with Force the defendant registered the plaintiff held the land ownership dispute with the force in which the rights of the defendant as Dryadodihrnrnam, one of which the district is co-owner of the land dispute only Not affect the rights of other heirs in the land dispute. It is not a debt on the condition of not opening up the action.
Filing of the contractual obligations are not dealing with the old law specifically. Has an age limit of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2520/2540.
Plaintiff's motion for the purpose of the court to revoke a transfer of ownership of land and buildings. But when the plaintiff has no right to sue for the revocation of the contract of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant and the plaintiff has asked the two defendants, both debt and interest of 14,560,000 baht. If the conditions of the debt does not open the box to force the payment of the price of land, including unpaid included. The plaintiff has the right to demand that the defendant, a payment by check, the price of building land owed by the plaintiff, presented in the lawsuit, and then following the Court of First Instance sentenced the defendant to a payment due to the amount specified. in check Justice is not up to the request.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4122/2540.
The defendant has brought a motorcycle to car hire, along with damages and Courts fee away Place to place the Property Central Office for payment to the plaintiff and to let the plaintiff know. I mean before the plaintiff's execution. Would hold that the defendants were operating under the verdict of the court settlement is complete. The plaintiff is not entitled to the confiscation of the defendant Enforcement Officer 2 to force the case anymore. Enforcement Officer the confiscation of the defendant. 2, the errors do not follow that the defendant struck the sentence would have Enforcement Officer. The plaintiff claims to have withdrawn to this confiscation. The plaintiff's petition that Vehicles that the defendant be placed on an office property placed deteriorated condition that the plaintiff has not been paying for. Appeal Court judges and only that. Both the defendant back together, etc. Only vehicles that motorcycles will not specify how the state and the plaintiff did not petition. Judgement of the Court of Appeal is final.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1495/2538.
The plaintiff handed the car second to the defendant without reserve the right to a penalty from the defendant under the contract even though the defendant to deliver cars delayed the plaintiff is a penalty for this reason not more when it is not registered under this car is. Private buses and have to wait for the registration of the Land Transport Department to take an appointment to inspect the damaged car from the plaintiff did not use the car does not delay the delivery vehicle. Plaintiff's car and two cars to be used in the business of the college. A. There has been agreement that the defendant is responsible for the registration of cars transformed into private buses and registered owners renamed it the defendant is responsible for all actions necessary to obtain a registration contract for the plaintiff would force the defendant to do so, but when the plaintiff required to submit the necessary documents to the defendant to complete the registration court would judge on the condition that the plaintiff sent the defendant to complete the document. The plaintiff sued the defendant delivered the car to drive two defect late in the contract is not registered under this car as a private passenger car and not registering a change of ownership to the plaintiff that the plaintiff did not sue the defendant. not deliver a second car at the residence of the plaintiff's place of delivery on the second car is not picking up the item at each other in civil court even if the Court of Appeal decision that it is not like the Supreme Court did not get diagnosed. Defendant does not own a second car if the car's actual owner refuses to register a second car transformed into private buses and registered owner of the name change, then the defendant will be forced to transfer the second car. would not have made the state debt is not open channel to transfer the defendant to the plaintiff a second vehicle enforcement can only return the car to the second plaintiff to the defendant and the defendant to the plaintiff's car rates.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5767/2537.
The plaintiff sued a house with land disputes, as part of the 5677 plot of land where the dead to give testament to the plaintiff to the defendant to two to fight it. 5677 land deed to the property of her husband who died of a Sat. To as. Instead of a rightful owner. A conflict of land raised the deed to the defendant and the plaintiff has no right 2 call from the defendant, two of the District Court determined that the issue in dispute. The plaintiff has the right to inherit property and rental value of the inheritance or lawsuit which would not only include the disputed land and home of the deceased inherit the property or with Because if the land is not disputed home of the deceased would not inherit the property of the deceased in the. The Court of Appeal ruled that the disputed land and home is not a legacy. The defendant handed to the two who died without a testament to the power to raise land and house belonging to the S. dispute to the plaintiff the plaintiff is not entitled to hire heritage and legacy. It is to be raised as an already well liked by the Court of First Instance. But the Court of Appeal ruled that the disputed land and houses which fall Marriage property S. who died were not disputing ownership of the land and house of the dead is a testament to raise their property which is not to find anyone who has not the will to do so without the deceased. Sat force the testimony in criminal cases before the conclusion that the deceased will be made in consultation with a legal aspect. At home on the property divided to heirs. A testament to the deceased party documents to the city Sat or not can not remember. When the deceased died Sat 2 let the defendant know that the will of the deceased made to the Sat plaintiff and defendant, 2 g to hear the will. Case is evident. The death raised conflict of land title documents the city Department of Buildings 5677 available to the heiress by the three S. witness consent when it was read testamentary Sat did not challenge or claim land and buildings back All three of the heiress Sat also taking the legacy of the dead by taking the legacy of another book. The evidence and circumstances of the case indicate that such waiver is intended Sat title deeds to land. 5677 with the building. To the deceased before the deceased is a testament to the city and department documents. Since a plot of land with the dead alone. Ownership. Registration is not required if ownership again. The death has disputed ownership of the land and house and raise the property of their wills to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to inherit property and inheritance according to the rent charge Costs of funeral of the dead, even the defendant, a claim that free of charge to 58,700 baht, but the defendant, 1, and counterclaim that the cost to be approximately 30,000 baht a District Court decision to charge. Funeral of death of 30,000 baht is reasonable then. For wages, attorneys and costs of litigation is concerned with managing the legacy of the deceased is a cost to benefit a share of the estate, the defendant, an action instead of heirs other must be deducted that the 300,000 baht from the estate. who died for the redemption of a mortgage, the defendant is a testament to redeem the mortgaged property by the plaintiff in the amount of 130,000 baht heir heiress Is responsible for redemption of mortgage of land by disposition For home repair disputes arising from state house building for a long time. When the repair of major renovations of 20,000 baht is a reasonable amount. The District Court determined that the plaintiff liable for the repair of 20,000 houses disputes like that, then the two defendants in their personal capacity as heir heirs under the will of a deceased person only. Applicable law of the deceased is in the possession of the defendant to 1, so the defendant 2 is not The right to withhold applicable law under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 in any way the plaintiff is the heiress to appear has not been part by the will the plaintiff would run. Lyrics by applicable law from the conflict of wills, etc. to death under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1673 plaintiff sued to force the defendant to request a transfer of ownership of land and house disputes. And delivered to the plaintiff the rent dispute. To ask the defendant. A division of land and house compensation settlement to the plaintiff by the plaintiff received compensation, even paying for the self-defendants sentenced to a transfer of disputed land and home to the plaintiff. Not judge the defendant. A split of compensation to the plaintiff. When it appears that the disputed land and houses have already been surrendered. If the debt is a condition of not opening up the execution of land and home ownership dispute that the plaintiff was. Imposed by the plaintiff was requested to obtain the land compensation dispute with the civil court house attached to the ETA. Because of circumstances which makes the transfer of disputed land and houses shall be impossible as a result, the first defendant to obtain compensation. Heritage management is the mutual benefit of the estate. The plaintiff is liable under the plaintiffs have inherited.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2159/2535.
The plaintiff purchased two cars from the Partnership disputes defendant. 1, which is the second defendant as the managing partner. To settle disputes and award automotive ago But not yet registered as a transfer of the two plaintiffs. The plaintiff, both are sued defendants three to jointly prepare, car registration and transfer of car registration dispute, both cars to the plaintiff both, but the fact hearing that the defendant 1 to 2 is a hire purchase disputes the defendant 3 defendants. 1 to 2 is not representative of the three defendants are accused of only 1 to 2 will only be liable to the plaintiff's contracts both However, both the plaintiff sued to force the defendant to request a second and prepared to transfer a car registered and listed the names of the two plaintiffs. Not to have registered for the Court to equate the intention to replace only When the car is disputing the ownership of the three defendants and a third defendant Nitiseampoanht no dispute about the car with the two plaintiffs. Therefore, the preparation and transfer of property, car registration with the object of the debt is not under the jurisdiction of a defendant to comply with the two contracts with both the plaintiff any further. Conditions of the debt does not open the box to force the request of the plaintiff both. Can not be sentenced to 2 1 that the defendant was liable for the action. Limited to a defendant's objective is to operate commercial motor vehicles and antiques of all kinds. Office Location offices are open The second defendant, the defendant is a managing partner at one of two disputed leases to sell to the plaintiff, both by car to the plaintiff's old car in exchange for the two disputes. And settle the rest. Not on a lease for use in the business of the defendant to a particular circumstance like this is characteristic of non-profit, such as regular traders exchange cars around the other to the defendant, 1 and 2, it is a merchant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1332 of that. Both the plaintiff purchased the car from the defendant disputed the 1 and 2, in good faith, even as car ownership dispute of the three defendants on both the plaintiff shall be protected by law. Without having to return to the defendant. 3 until the third defendant, the owner will pay the price. In this case, holding that the act is legally not a violation of the third defendant has no power to counterclaim for damages from both the plaintiff owned the car dispute.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3509/2542.
The defendant to that Accused home loan. Check it out to the marshland would like to join the venture and invest money held in the defendant's venture capital. And agree to cancel the loan. Check the debt is extinguished. Defendant appeals and revision that Check out the defendant has an agreement in time. Check out the check to not collect the money and the account is not picking up the item at each other and the like in the lower courts. Check the transferable securities to the Trust during Payable to the holder and all that. When the check to your billing. Will be paid by check. Terms of any conditions which ban or restrict the payment would be made, therefore it must follow. Provisions of the law underlines the defendant in the black box date Such action does not authorize the provisions of the law that has made such statements as a result find it either. To check that under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 899 determines that the defendant not to reissue the checks were issued when the plaintiff has been checked and put into the account. Plaintiff or the bank staff is. The check was dated the last paragraph of Article 910, Section 898 plaintiffs to endorse checks signature holder. Must be considered. Insurance or the Aval payable under Section 921 of the 989 by operation of law, not Aval Aval under section 939 does not require a written statement indicating that Aval is a plaintiff liable B. Section 940 paragraph one and to pay debt to the liability towards payment of bills by B. This is not to let the plaintiff know the defendant and will constitute a debt. The rape receivables.
The Supreme Court 2086 - 2087/2550.
Land sale contract that the plaintiff and the defendant made the buyer deposits the sale is not configured to Sinatn. The defendant shall be entitled to redeem the land sale with the price of sale with the Commercial Code, Section 499, first paragraph, if the defendant has redeemed the land sale money within the contract. But the plaintiff did not consent to ransom. The defendant shall be entitled to redeem the land sale by bringing money to the Office of Property Sinatn place to place within redeem the property forfeited property is placed withdraw. This case held that the sale of land vested in the defendant's property from the time the defendant has put the property, which Sinatn Commercial Code, Section 492, first paragraph.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1713/2543.
When the debtor for payment by operating well Creditors do not accept payment to a debtor is relieved not to have damaged the law allows the property settlement, which placed object debt for the benefit of creditors. When placing property and then would break away from debt. The debtor shall not be liable to creditors for another under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 334 and 335 show that the debtor only has the right to withdraw property placed upon the defendant to 2 deposit for payment to the plaintiff in another case one and not the right to withdraw assets. In other cases, creditors will seize or freeze the money to put the defendant to two other debt and when the attachment is not prohibited by law. Considered that the attachment is not money, not selling. Fees are not called Enforcement Officer.
Claim that the freeze did not like and ask them to withdraw the attachment. The case is requested to relieve the suffering can not be calculated as price money.
The Supreme Court 2949 - 2951/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant describe the floor area of MBK Center. Plaintiff's first floor to a new part. Sat, and last year. Lease laws are not the plaintiff is aware of the tenant to lease all three cases the plaintiff is why all three cases the tenant may not be intuitive to the rights of creditors have the right to rent that is not true. the money to pay rent to the plaintiff, but to put that property placing central office under the Legal Execution Department to pay the lenders under the actual sentence the plaintiff to obtain the money but can not get the money. The plaintiff did not receive the rent is directly caused by the defendant has no right to lease the defendant's actions violate the rights of the plaintiff's claim that the residents essentially alleging that the plaintiff can not receive tenants rent money to put all three cases are caused by the tenant to lease all three cases the plaintiff has not paid the rent but the rent money to place at the office by placing a central place property, provided that payment. True to creditors under the Supreme Court a final act of the tenant three cases are not the actions of the defendant and the plaintiff can not get money because the rent was a condition that all three cases the tenant is not defined. Because the defendant objected to the claim of the plaintiff in any way the defendant had entered into agreements with three more tenants before putting the property violated the defendant did not dispute the right of the plaintiff, or which causes the plaintiff paid the rent from the office place. Property Central is not the plaintiff has no authority to sue the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6070/2539.
The defendant used the rent money to put into place at the Office of Property by the terms of payment shall be payable as a final court order to show that It is so beneficial to both the plaintiff or its creditors, the district is entitled to rent may not be true that the defendant was indeed intuitive. The deposit of the defendant is a reason like not the fault of the defendant and the defendant has the right to place the property to pay rent due to the defendant was free from debt lease under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 331.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8253/2538.
Sub-contract the defendant from the plaintiff disputed area. The defendant has the responsibility to pay rent, sublet, but the plaintiff A. The owner and the lessor was still a defendant the right to demand rent from tenants and A. Chang directly informed the defendant made. their lease with. They claim that has terminated the lease to the lessee, then the original. Failure to comply will be filed until the defendant drove to a contract with the company. Tue under the circumstances. Defendant would not know that any party has the right better. The defendant used the rent money that has been demand from the plaintiff and its district offices to put that property placing holds that the defendant can not be intuitive to know the right or indeed by creditors is not the fault of the defendant. When the defendant did not know who is right is better. Therefore, the defendant must be defined. Conditions that. The person having the right to real disputes in the rental lease is a recipient money is placed. Not a condition to which the plaintiff can not receive money for deposit with the defendant's like the Civil and Commercial Code and Section 331.
The Supreme Court 3785 - 3789/2538.
The plaintiff raised the claim that the principle of housing is charged with five tenants and the rent money to put that property placing central office. Legal Execution Department, the plaintiff can not get money to rent a place. Claims of the plaintiff the cause of the tenants and five rental contract with the plaintiff then fails to pay rent to the amount the rent to place at the office put property central condition for payment to creditors true the sentence is final. This is the work of tenants and five non-action of the defendant. The plaintiff can not receive money for rent because a tenant policy is that all five cases defined. Not because the defendant to challenge the claim of the plaintiff's rent in any way. The defendant has entered into lease with the tenant before placing five property. Defendant has not violated or disputed right to the plaintiff. Which causes the plaintiff paid the rent from the central office does not place the property. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1288/2537.
Lease the defendant, including kitchen equipment used in commercial food business from the plaintiff. Later, the land owner has driven the plaintiff to sue. Defendant and the related issue of the rent by claiming that Land and buildings leased to their own. Defendant has to take place at the office rental property central place because you can not discerning the true rights of creditors. Or who are eligible for repayment. Even later, Chief Legal Execution Department to order the defendant to refund the rent. The opinion that Officers should not be placed defendant property was recovered and placed the case in civil court to sue the owner of the land drive. And the lawsuit was withdrawn landowners sue The agreement allows landowners to pay compensation to the plaintiff the right to lease the property involved and the defendant agree to all of the leased land as the owner. Not impressed both the civil and criminal cases against each other in terms of withdrawal of the plaintiff and the defendant sued in a lawsuit filed expel it. If a compromise agreement, it is considered a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant dispute in this case did not find it. Because there is no agreement whatsoever between the plaintiff and the defendant in this case indicates that the intention to dispute in this case complete with suspension or waiver to allow different parties to the case when the plaintiff sued the defendant defaulted on payment of rent. break the contract damages, the defendant must use per se that Defendant and the plaintiff has the right to breach of contract claim for damages or not. When the defendant put the money to rent office property place because landowners are allegedly in violation of the lease and sue fighter and later be put to the Court of First Instance in cases such as this would not constitute a default. pay the rent, which will cause the lease break for no.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 515/2535.
Putting assets to the court about the work of a court adjudication is not a legal action announced by the National Executive Council No. 216, despite the royal decree number 21, the Office of Property Central Place is a government agency. Of the Legal Execution Department Ministry of Justice Placing property is still a job. Relating to the Judiciary. According to the Ministry of Justice with the immediate wealth. Property Office, place center. Department of Legal Execution Clause 2 requires that the debtor or third parties may be placing the Office of Property Sub place in the event. Following ... (5) Where under the provisions of other laws (6) if the command Court under the provisions of law, such as last year. Civil code Procedure Section 264, so the deposit to the court for compensation according to the National Executive Council No. 295, first paragraph, Article 67 would mean the deposit of compensation to the Office. Central Department of Legal Execution and Deposit of Property, which defendant surrendered to authorities. Property to compensation that the plaintiff did not accept to put the central office put the property constitute a deposit of compensation paid to the court and the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a compensation that the plaintiff.
