Section 453 that a trade agreement which the person is a party called the seller of the property transferred to the other person called the buyer and the buyer agree to use the assets to the seller.
Section 454 of the one party promised before to buy or sell will have the effect of trading when the other party notice of intention to make the transaction complete, and all such notices to the individuals. The promise then.
If the commitment is not scheduled to notice, then know that You that the people who are committed to set a reasonable time and notice to the parties to the other party to respond to a course within the prescribed time to complete the transaction through or not. If no answer, and is certainly within that time know that That have committed before it shall be annulled.
Section 455 when it's time to go before trading. You mean that when the contracts and successfully complete
Section 456 of real estate transaction. If not registered by the authority in writing and void. Use this method to trading vessels are liable to up to five tons. The patch dealing with vehicles and animals.
Contract to sell or buy. Or committed in the sale of the property as stated in paragraph one. If no evidence either in writing signed by the liable party is important. Or place or a regular payment and then some. Sued to force the case to find no
The provisions mentioned in the previous paragraph. Shall apply to contracts of movable property that is the price agreed upon by the two thousand Baht Or more than that with
Section 457 Fees contracts that Suppliers should use the same two parties.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2889/2553.
While plaintiff's land contract dispute from the defendant, a requirement that the plaintiff did not transfer the land dispute. The land acts as expressly prohibited by law. Would void the Commercial Code, Section 150 plaintiff has no obligation to settle the remaining land to the other defendant, the plaintiff made a contract to purchase land because of land disputes are not aware of the dispute. Before that land disputes are the subject of law, the prohibition on transfer. If the plaintiff is not acting arbitrarily as if to settle the debt. Know that he is not bound to pay or act on which the debt. Violates the prohibition by law or morality, the Commercial Code, Section 407 and Section 411 that a defendant must refund the cost of land has been paid to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff claims trading and permitting the court to the fact that the contract Land disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant, one does not refer to the fact that as a receipt. So there's no stamp duty and no restrictions are placed on the hearing of evidence by the fiscal P. Section 118.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2542/2553.
The purchase and sale agreement is a preliminary contract. Contracts later was to make a request in accordance with an agreement to purchase To sell to the rich. Unless the contract is canceled or altered by agreement in the purchase and sale agreement to buy and sell contracts, so it is part of the contract. As a binding contract agreement.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2493/2553.
Contracts to buy and sell specific units that Miss condominium project. Condominium is located on a land plot area of 380 square meters, but the actual plot of land with an area of only 200 square meters, so the act is wrong conditions in the agreement. Part of the condominium parking is not specified in the agreement to buy and sell units that will be at How many parking spaces and condominiums planned publications did not specify how many cars will Parking is the same. 17 parking spaces exist in the application of the construction of a defendant filed only Saen Suk Municipality. Truth condominium parking 6 cars, so the only breach the conditions for permits to Saen Suk Municipality. The Municipality of San Suk was the prosecution in this section a defendant, is not a case where the defendant failing to comply with pledges or ad provided to people to buy. Moreover, the defendant, a condominium is not in the organized force of the parking area under the Ministerial Regulation No. 7 (2517) assumes that the plaintiff and Rs. Mistake in this Article is not.
Breach of conditions set in the flesh the land condominiums that do not follow. Contracts to buy and sell units is not significant of the purchase and sale agreement is void because the defendant agreed to a contract to buy and sell units, not land Apartment, property which is the object of the purchase and sale contract. Breach of the terms in the land of meat is just a mistake in the property. Condominium which is void under Section 157 Commercial Code, which will clear within a year to tell from the time of ratification may be, or within 10 years after the act which made void by the Commercial Code, Section 181 agreements. the purchase and sale is not void.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5801/2552.
Defendant sold the land under the Certificate, A. and L. Parent The plaintiff did not register with the competent because the defendant stating that if The money will come back to buy later. But the contracts with the delivery of Certificate and land. To take possession of their belongings. If you have any of that money will come back later to buy the property back such as the nature of redemption. Contract of sale with the Commercial Code, Section 491 is not listed on the official would void the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one problem that the act of sale made a mistake or a void. Legal problems concerning public order. Supreme Court's decision has raised the power Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5) of Section 246 and 247.
L to the district and land tenure disputes, it is even later, instead of the defendant to death, and A. L. deliver possession of the land dispute to the plaintiff. Land tenure disputes the plaintiff's land disputes must be considered instead. Defendants until further notice based on the changing nature of the Commercial Code, Section 1381, or until the defendant is the intention to take possession of the Commercial Code, Section 1377 and 1379 the plaintiff's testimony that Plaintiff by the defendant to transfer title to the defendant as a plaintiff three times, but the defendant did not consent. It held that the notice does not change the nature of Section 1381 are based on the above, but urge that the defendant is not the intention of taking possession under Section 1377 and 1379 the plaintiff has not bought or land disputes. Land disputes are the only Certificate. Defendant shall have the right to request changes to a plot of land under the Land Code.
When it appears that land disputes have gone from a Certificate deed Defendant shall have the ownership of land and land disputes. The plaintiff is owned only by the Crnobcrnoongprpeuษt only Despite the fact that after listening to a land dispute with a land title deed and the plaintiff was. Notice of change based on the characteristics of the Commercial Code, Section 1381, but even when the plaintiff to sue on the plaintiff to possession of less than 10 years of land disputes are not owned by Hostile possession the Commercial Code, Section 1382.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2154/2552.
Land contract between the plaintiff and the defendant says. Due to land disputes contact the mortgage bank. If the plaintiff redeemed when the mortgage is registered immediately transferred to the defendant. This contract is an agreement to purchase land under the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two, which must be evidenced in writing ... or a place regularly or have to pay some debts. Then the execution is impeccable. When an agreement to purchase this land has written a message that the plaintiff. The price received by the defendant to complete from the date of January 23, 2541 hearing of evidence, the court must be in accordance with the provisions of P.wi.po. Section 94 (b) the plaintiff is the successor to witness that. In fact, the plaintiff received only 90,000 baht for land for land remaining to the defendant to pay to the Bank Wed plaintiff to pay the mortgage debt on the land to the banks did not. Because the hearing person changes the text in the document.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5962/2551.
Am only give the land to grow house accident B., excluding home And enhance homeland cause the plaintiff to demolish to create new Because the home is not an acquisition of land and raised in a manner movable. Non-real estate assets. Lifting the house scene is complete without looking must be in writing and registered. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456 authority under paragraph one.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6436/2550.
Defendant to the plaintiff a land dispute and possession delivered to then. With no intent to contract in writing is void. But a land dispute Dendinamืoepenr. The first defendant to deliver possession of the transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff under Commercial Code Section 1378 land dispute is the plaintiff the defendant has no right to register a transfer of ownership to the two defendants because the transferee has no right. better than the transferor.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 675/2550.
The land dispute between the plaintiff and the meters are not registered by the authority. Void the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one, but when the trade is also a land dispute Land, empty-handed Village has just bought or delivered only on m and the plaintiff to possess the disputed land and then. The plaintiff would have bought or under Section 1377 and 1378, which came with a possessory right to the possession under the law. Is not acquired under the contract of sale shall m no duty to act in a way that you have to register transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued for it has no power to force a defendant to the heirs of M. m. withdraw from a disputed plot of land.
The Supreme Court 7422 - 7426/2549.
Land disputes have divided pm to petitioner as part of the five individuals who sings along with the delivery of possession of land to each petitioner to serve the land promised by the PM to register ownership. to each petitioner in the area after the petitioner each purchase, but died hours before. The process is not only the separation and transfer of land to the petitioner indicating that each land dispute pm. And sing all five. Who buy the land. They are intended to contracts and the registration of land ownership dispute in writing to the official authorities in the future. When a trading division of land is only the action was successful. The land dispute between the petitioner and five hours. It is a contract to buy and sell Trading is not done strictly prohibited. All five of the petitioner to take possession of the land in dispute is that each person possesses. It is based on the rights of possession pm, the purchase and sale agreement. Of land disputes, which take hours, not to rely instead, as the owner. When the petitioner did not appear to have changed the nature of the notice to take am not intentionally take land disputes instead of the Commercial Code, Section 1381 even if the petitioner to occupy the land dispute more than 10 consecutive years, it's not proprietary. Hostile possession by the Commercial Code, Section 1382.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7183/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant that the petition be vague Defendant never received notice to demand payment. Contract claims between the plaintiff and the Organization for Reform of Financial System (Prs.) to act outside the purpose of the plaintiff. But the Court of First Instance did not diagnose the problem. And the plaintiff did not appeal the issue to Sreouthrnntprc 3 is both law and fact that the parties have not been raised by the Supreme Court did not like the Court of Appeal Region 3 Civil Code Procedure been diagnosed according to the Article 249, paragraph one
Contract non-performing assets of Prs. Between the plaintiff and the Prs. Arising out of that. King of Financial Sector Restructuring Act 2540 Section 7 (3) empowers the Prs. Liquidator has the power company suspended operations in which the case is capital firms M. C. . C. Co., Ltd. (Thailand), because the banks and financial companies can not continue to operate. Decree and the first paragraph of Article 30 also empowers the Prs. Have the power to sell assets to liquidation of the company has more openly with the bidding. When the plaintiff is the auction of assets and loans, which the defendant is a debtor of the banks and financial companies such. The plaintiff's trade is based on. King of Financial Reform Act 2540 that the contracts are not derivatives of each other. And not an act aimed against the public order.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6315/2549.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 457 applies to the parties in the contracts. This is a matter between the buyer and the seller only The registration fee right of redemption to be paid by Por land is state money collected from farmers as compensation by the State to serve the people who Por land subject to section 104 the applicant is free of charge. Which debt incurred by the law and look at the share of debt is not paid. Without regard to the people who filed an application for registration of rights and juristic act together, the parties shall agree a fee so the plaintiff shall be entitled to call for a buyer or selling one or two of them to pay fees absent. all.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6289/2549.
Permitting defendants to fight the trade date, the parties shall not be transferable to register it. Is not a contract to buy and sell Even without paying for Point two places set to any issue in dispute. But the problem that permitting the plaintiff to sue to force the case to the Commercial Code, Section 456 is not that The law in relation with the public order. The defendant shall be entitled to raise claims of Appeals as Civil Code Procedure Section 225, paragraph two of the Court of Appeal Region 1 not get a diagnosis that is not like
Letter text in trading. Despite stating that the seller has received the deposit in the amount of one and let the buyer pay for the rest within a year, with the property that any dealing. But without any text at the intent of the parties shows that if the buyer paid full price then. Buyers and sellers are going to make a written contract and register with the authority to later. Letter of the contracts is absolutely finished. When not made correctly according to law is void under Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one of the plaintiff could not sue to enforce the trade and permitting the defendant as the trustee to transfer the disputed land.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6229/2549.
A. Land, a land dispute with a Certificate in writing to the plaintiff but did not register the transfer of rights together, but district officials intent on taking possession of land disputes and the transfer of disputed land occupied by delivering to the plaintiff. And the plaintiff to possess with intent to rely on their purchase of land disputes, so the district has ended, and the plaintiff shall have possessory right to the Commercial Code, Section 1367, 1377 and 1378 A. No owner, A. and no right to mortgage the land dispute to the two defendants because the Commercial Code, Section 705 prohibited the mortgage has no effect. Without regard to whether the defendants 2, the mortgagee innocently or not, because the right of acquisition of property shall not be raised as a defense a third party who is entitled to the charge compensation in good faith and has registered rights in good faith then. the Commercial Code, Section 1299, paragraph two must have a right to land has been registered. And the right to have the documents must be issued by the love of the land. When the title deed dispute did not like the two defendants claimed to be caused by the land did not like the accused has not Case is not governed by Section 1299 of the second paragraph of the plaintiff has the power to sue for the revocation of acts over land dispute between the district and the defendant was the second.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4767/2549.
Contract disputes indicates that car ownership in the car will fall to the buyer when the price paid in several installments as set out fully and then considered the contract terms. This title is not transferred to the buyer. Until the buyer paid full price. Trading on the condition that the property is transferred in the future together. Sellers may have owned property in the future be issued in advance. And is a function of the seller to transfer the property to the buyer. When the buyer's conditions and operations. Sellers do not need a title to the property at the time the contracts so that the plaintiff and the defendant made the contract of sale car ownership in the property dispute by the parties later on. Even when contracts are not plaintiff's ownership or title to property is not complete. Contract, it has become enforceable. The defendant refused to pay for breach of contract to the plaintiff and caused the plaintiff to terminate the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the power.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2618/2549.
Bankruptcy is a case where the plaintiff sued the defendant that the debt situations. Issue is whether the defendant has no liability or situations. This case is a separate issue with the plaintiff sued the defendant asked to enforce payment to the plaintiff in debt contracts. So it's not the same as Article 173, paragraph two P.wi.po. not a lawsuit waiting.
Agreement contract land between the defendant, one with the defendant, 2 is the defendant, a transfer of rights and responsibilities in compliance with contracts with the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is not only to transfer claims to the plaintiff. 2 only if the defendant is not subject to transfer claims it can not take the Commercial Code, Section 306 in force. However, the plaintiff and the defendant has made a second later agreed that The plaintiff and the defendant 2 has contracts soil, a soil conversion with the defendant that a contract will trade from the plaintiff and the defendant, 2 the excavation of the plaintiff to complete and then accused the two to pay the earth to the plaintiff. complete Can be considered as a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, a creditor, a debtor who the two new Would have the effect of new debt with a debtor under Section 350, which changed the debts between the plaintiff and the defendant to an end shall be suspended in accordance with Section 349, then the plaintiff has no authority to sue a defendant liable under land contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2551/2549.
A defendant disputes the plaintiff's land. The land contract disputes clause 2 states that "a contract that If the liquidation saw Or transfer of business to any person. Or the buyer does not serve this piece of land. Buyer agrees to sell back to the seller in person in accordance with Article 1 In addition, the seller agreed to be purchased in writing "is the commitment of the defendant to one that the plaintiff has the right to buy land dispute back from the defendant, one on the defendant to a dissolution of sawmill or transfer of business to others. Or do not land disputes. Such commitment is a commitment to purchase property which the law is that If there is no evidence either in writing signed by the liable party is important. Or regular place or have some debt. To sue for enforcement is not the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two law enforcement determined that such a commitment must be registered by the officials to be sued to force the case was not in any way. When the pledges made in writing and signed by the two defendants as the managing partner of the defendant to a plaintiff and a defendant's seal has sued to force the case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5915/2548.
If the buyer and the seller did not agree on fees for the sale of land set aside as something else. Buyer and seller must charge the same parties under Section 457 of the Commercial Code, when a defendant who sell land to the defendant, two buyers agreed on fees for registration and that the act. each partner equally under the deposit the purchase and sale document refers Mon 2 defendants 1 and 2 are required to pay the liability equally. The plaintiff referred to the two defendants jointly liable for the fees by not filing.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3970/2548.
9 Sreouthrnntprc ruled that permitting trade between the plaintiff and the helicopter is a contract of sale that is similar to the final contract completion. The contracts themselves are void. The plaintiff can not claim ownership of the home purchase contract of sale in accordance with it. Permit the use of land and buildings at the Department of Public Welfare agreed to allow plaintiffs to use the disputed land. Look like a rental agreement. This is the right person. The plaintiff can not force other than the parties. Defendant disputed land and houses before the plaintiff had not disputed possession of land and houses. Do not hold that the actions of the defendant disputed the plaintiff's rights under the lease. The plaintiff has no power to sue. The plaintiff's petition that the district who rent land and home to the defendant disputes. Not transfer the rights and licenses from the Department of Public Welfare has possession of the district is occupied by illegal since the beginning. And to live in a land dispute and the defendant's home is a disputed right to the plaintiff. Not an argument against the decision to sentence Sreouthrnntprc 9 in any way. The petition is not in compliance with Section 249, paragraph one of the Supreme Court Cicil Code Procedure not been diagnosed.
Contract between the plaintiff and the helicopter is a real estate contract of sale. This is absolutely one of contract completion. Form must follow the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one, if not made in writing and registered by the authority. Shall become null and void.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2675/2548.
That at a car sales contract to the plaintiff, instead of debt by converting debt to purchase a car instead. Can be considered a debt under a new Commercial Code, Section 349, first paragraph, however. Letter purchase cars such conditions are noted that while the seller does not deliver the property sold to the buyer shall be deemed to have no trade, so it considered the case of debt, which will should arise because the debt that new to did not occur. Debt was the Commercial Code, Section 351 loans are not the end of the suspension. In this case, holding that the plaintiff has the evidence of the loan book is to show then. And need not be the case that stamp duty under the income tax Grad.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1765/2548.
Disputed land is the land allocation of the second defendant cooperative contracts of land disputes are governed by the terms do not transfer. Land Allocation Act BE 2511, living first paragraph of Article 12 agreements on land disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant made within a period of 5 years from the date the defendant received a Certificate (. Nor Sor 3 Kor) aims is expressly prohibited by law. Commercial Code is void under Section 150 even though the plaintiff may take possession of land and disputes. It is considered just a land dispute on behalf of the defendant that an owner of the land dispute and the defendant, one has the right to the land to the mortgaged to the defendant, 2 the plaintiff can not be sued for the cancellation of the mortgaged land dispute between two defendants.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 736/2548.
The plaintiff is the plaintiff's accounts receivable for shares purchased from the defendant that the defendant is S. Director is authorized to act on behalf of Agriculture and land improvements with that. Its placenta and its hospital, which the plaintiff is authorized on behalf of the plaintiff. Defendant agreed to take the money, which is debtor S. Wor. to offset their share of the plaintiff to pay a fee to pay to the defendant. This case, like other debt instead of debt to be preserved under an agreement Commercial Code, Section 321, paragraph one
The plaintiff sued the defendants share a money payment returned due to break up the share purchase agreement. Find the right to sue to force the defendant to comply with the share purchase agreement is not. This case, no law on the age, especially Therefore the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 402/2548.
Letter home sale transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant is a real estate contract. When officials are not registered to void the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one of this house was built on land owned by the State Property Ministry, so the defendant is a possessor of land and house building. only. When the defendant made an agreement to sell the land and home to the plaintiff. And delivery of land and home to the plaintiff by the plaintiff to receive compensation. So listen to the defendant taking possession of the land and house ownership transfer to the plaintiff under Section 1377 and then 1378 and the defendant shall also recognize the right of the plaintiff for a contract to lease the plaintiff. Demonstrates that the defendant take possession of land and houses instead of the plaintiff. Breach of contract when the defendant and the plaintiff does not wish to rent to the defendant in the land and home again. The plaintiff has the power to expel the defendant sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8716/2547.
The plaintiff contracted to a music rights for the accused to an amount of 200,000 baht and take notes at the end license agreement that song. If the defendant has sold, or use the copyright in musical works. Defendants will share the benefit of the plaintiff that a total of 50 percent of the funds received from the sale or use of copyright A case seen as the remuneration of Baht 200,000 specified in the contract rights in the song is too little, yet the defendant license to buy music that I do not want to pay higher, while contract Therefore choose to increase benefits from the sale of rights or permission to use copyrighted music in the musical in the future. This behavior was not a plaintiff and the defendant agreed to a joint enterprise with the intention to share profits, but business should be done in a manner that a partnership agreement establishing the Commercial Code, Section 1012 therefore does not listen. license agreement that music has made a deliberate spoof of the first plaintiff and the defendant, which is intended to camouflage into a partnership agreement under which the plaintiff claims that it is an agreement to transfer the copyright in musical works. The five plaintiffs are not the copyright owner anymore. But would be eligible for benefits under the agreement only
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3194/2547.
Defendant to the plaintiff's contract, advertising, products and goods to the plaintiff the defendant will agree to advertise a product to product. When the ads, the defendant agreed to pay advertising costs to the plaintiff. Defendant that the plaintiff is not intended to be a transfer of ownership in the property is one of the defendants. And the defendant agreed to that price. Not to look the Civil and Commercial Code Book 3 contracts with a trading style. But it is the plaintiff contractor agreed to complete the advertisement of goods to the defendant employer. And the defendant agreed to pay for advertising or Sinhgrong success of the work. Into the nature of employment made by the Commercial Code, Section 587.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 412/2547.
The plaintiff claims that the land owners and occupiers of land disputes. Defendant refused to transfer a name plaintiff in the disputed plot of land which the plaintiff's rights under Section 55 Civil Code Procedure. Although the sale of land between the plaintiff and the defendant will not be made in writing and registered by the authority which makes void any contract. But while the land sale contract is not a document of title. Only Certificate. When the defendant to deliver possession. The plaintiff shall have possessory right in land dispute When the defendant the right to dispute. The plaintiff has the power to sue
Period under Commercial Code Section 1375, paragraph two is the right time to take legal action to regain possession of the No land documents. No matter the age. This case the plaintiff sued the defendant registered the plaintiff's separate property. The plaintiff is the owner of the land. Cases, there is no competition issues which will need to possess the right to sue, which call for return of possession within a year from the time of the taking of possession. The plaintiff has the right to prosecute even when more than one year from the date on which the defendant requested the title deeds.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4961/2546.
Transfer claims, which non-performing assets in the income of the defendant to the plaintiff was forced to sue a financial institution claims to be the case in court. According to the provisions of Section 7 of the king's asset management companies. Commercial Code is not void under section 150.
The transfer of claims between the plaintiff and the Asset Management Company on Wed transferee transferee has authorized the plaintiff, a former recipient debt litigation attorney instead. Holding that the debt was assigned a representative payee and the debt charges incurred under section 9 of the king's order to transfer the claims between the plaintiff and the Asset Management Company shall be legitimate, so Wed. Law without notice to the defendant transferred to the debtor under the Commercial Code, Section 306 asset management companies are eligible Wed petition to put right as a party plaintiff was represented by its executive king. Section 7, the assets of First Instance order to allow asset management companies Wed to wear a pair of right instead of the plaintiff is well
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3952/2546.
The plaintiff and the defendant had to file the official land ownership to the land surveying division. But I can not agree. Because the plaintiff's land lost about 30 square meters of land to the plaintiff the plaintiff's 100 square but the defendant did not consent. Would hold that the right of the plaintiff argues the defendant is already The plaintiff has the power to sue
The plaintiff accused the land sale contract by the plaintiff to hold ownership of a certain area is 100 square meters for surveying the defendant on plaintiff's property divided in separate parts of their land out. Appeared to land conversion and missing 30 square meters to take the space that the defendant claimed that the missing offset from the pulp and the conversion of land to the plaintiff under the separation of land in the deed did not find it. The plaintiff has ownership of the land of 100 square meters by the real market.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2733/2546.
Contracts made between the opposition and accused the two are labeled, but only that. The opposition has sold cars of the mid to defendant 2 in Price 320,000 baht for deposit to 170,000 baht while the remaining 150,000 baht will be paid on January 29, 2541 agreement it is a contract done strictly at the break. Settlement price for two periods only, so when the contract finished. In car ownership would transfer to the second defendant, the buyer, pursuant to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 458 agreement is not conditional on a transfer of ownership under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 of the car owner's objections are not central. Has no right to file an objection. Request that the court has ordered returned to the car's central objection is.
Section 454 of the one party promised before to buy or sell will have the effect of trading when the other party notice of intention to make the transaction complete, and all such notices to the individuals. The promise then.
If the commitment is not scheduled to notice, then know that You that the people who are committed to set a reasonable time and notice to the parties to the other party to respond to a course within the prescribed time to complete the transaction through or not. If no answer, and is certainly within that time know that That have committed before it shall be annulled.
Section 455 when it's time to go before trading. You mean that when the contracts and successfully complete
Section 456 of real estate transaction. If not registered by the authority in writing and void. Use this method to trading vessels are liable to up to five tons. The patch dealing with vehicles and animals.
Contract to sell or buy. Or committed in the sale of the property as stated in paragraph one. If no evidence either in writing signed by the liable party is important. Or place or a regular payment and then some. Sued to force the case to find no
The provisions mentioned in the previous paragraph. Shall apply to contracts of movable property that is the price agreed upon by the two thousand Baht Or more than that with
Section 457 Fees contracts that Suppliers should use the same two parties.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2889/2553.
While plaintiff's land contract dispute from the defendant, a requirement that the plaintiff did not transfer the land dispute. The land acts as expressly prohibited by law. Would void the Commercial Code, Section 150 plaintiff has no obligation to settle the remaining land to the other defendant, the plaintiff made a contract to purchase land because of land disputes are not aware of the dispute. Before that land disputes are the subject of law, the prohibition on transfer. If the plaintiff is not acting arbitrarily as if to settle the debt. Know that he is not bound to pay or act on which the debt. Violates the prohibition by law or morality, the Commercial Code, Section 407 and Section 411 that a defendant must refund the cost of land has been paid to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff claims trading and permitting the court to the fact that the contract Land disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant, one does not refer to the fact that as a receipt. So there's no stamp duty and no restrictions are placed on the hearing of evidence by the fiscal P. Section 118.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2542/2553.
The purchase and sale agreement is a preliminary contract. Contracts later was to make a request in accordance with an agreement to purchase To sell to the rich. Unless the contract is canceled or altered by agreement in the purchase and sale agreement to buy and sell contracts, so it is part of the contract. As a binding contract agreement.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2493/2553.
Contracts to buy and sell specific units that Miss condominium project. Condominium is located on a land plot area of 380 square meters, but the actual plot of land with an area of only 200 square meters, so the act is wrong conditions in the agreement. Part of the condominium parking is not specified in the agreement to buy and sell units that will be at How many parking spaces and condominiums planned publications did not specify how many cars will Parking is the same. 17 parking spaces exist in the application of the construction of a defendant filed only Saen Suk Municipality. Truth condominium parking 6 cars, so the only breach the conditions for permits to Saen Suk Municipality. The Municipality of San Suk was the prosecution in this section a defendant, is not a case where the defendant failing to comply with pledges or ad provided to people to buy. Moreover, the defendant, a condominium is not in the organized force of the parking area under the Ministerial Regulation No. 7 (2517) assumes that the plaintiff and Rs. Mistake in this Article is not.
Breach of conditions set in the flesh the land condominiums that do not follow. Contracts to buy and sell units is not significant of the purchase and sale agreement is void because the defendant agreed to a contract to buy and sell units, not land Apartment, property which is the object of the purchase and sale contract. Breach of the terms in the land of meat is just a mistake in the property. Condominium which is void under Section 157 Commercial Code, which will clear within a year to tell from the time of ratification may be, or within 10 years after the act which made void by the Commercial Code, Section 181 agreements. the purchase and sale is not void.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5801/2552.
Defendant sold the land under the Certificate, A. and L. Parent The plaintiff did not register with the competent because the defendant stating that if The money will come back to buy later. But the contracts with the delivery of Certificate and land. To take possession of their belongings. If you have any of that money will come back later to buy the property back such as the nature of redemption. Contract of sale with the Commercial Code, Section 491 is not listed on the official would void the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one problem that the act of sale made a mistake or a void. Legal problems concerning public order. Supreme Court's decision has raised the power Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5) of Section 246 and 247.
L to the district and land tenure disputes, it is even later, instead of the defendant to death, and A. L. deliver possession of the land dispute to the plaintiff. Land tenure disputes the plaintiff's land disputes must be considered instead. Defendants until further notice based on the changing nature of the Commercial Code, Section 1381, or until the defendant is the intention to take possession of the Commercial Code, Section 1377 and 1379 the plaintiff's testimony that Plaintiff by the defendant to transfer title to the defendant as a plaintiff three times, but the defendant did not consent. It held that the notice does not change the nature of Section 1381 are based on the above, but urge that the defendant is not the intention of taking possession under Section 1377 and 1379 the plaintiff has not bought or land disputes. Land disputes are the only Certificate. Defendant shall have the right to request changes to a plot of land under the Land Code.
When it appears that land disputes have gone from a Certificate deed Defendant shall have the ownership of land and land disputes. The plaintiff is owned only by the Crnobcrnoongprpeuษt only Despite the fact that after listening to a land dispute with a land title deed and the plaintiff was. Notice of change based on the characteristics of the Commercial Code, Section 1381, but even when the plaintiff to sue on the plaintiff to possession of less than 10 years of land disputes are not owned by Hostile possession the Commercial Code, Section 1382.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2154/2552.
Land contract between the plaintiff and the defendant says. Due to land disputes contact the mortgage bank. If the plaintiff redeemed when the mortgage is registered immediately transferred to the defendant. This contract is an agreement to purchase land under the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two, which must be evidenced in writing ... or a place regularly or have to pay some debts. Then the execution is impeccable. When an agreement to purchase this land has written a message that the plaintiff. The price received by the defendant to complete from the date of January 23, 2541 hearing of evidence, the court must be in accordance with the provisions of P.wi.po. Section 94 (b) the plaintiff is the successor to witness that. In fact, the plaintiff received only 90,000 baht for land for land remaining to the defendant to pay to the Bank Wed plaintiff to pay the mortgage debt on the land to the banks did not. Because the hearing person changes the text in the document.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5962/2551.
Am only give the land to grow house accident B., excluding home And enhance homeland cause the plaintiff to demolish to create new Because the home is not an acquisition of land and raised in a manner movable. Non-real estate assets. Lifting the house scene is complete without looking must be in writing and registered. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456 authority under paragraph one.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6436/2550.
Defendant to the plaintiff a land dispute and possession delivered to then. With no intent to contract in writing is void. But a land dispute Dendinamืoepenr. The first defendant to deliver possession of the transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff under Commercial Code Section 1378 land dispute is the plaintiff the defendant has no right to register a transfer of ownership to the two defendants because the transferee has no right. better than the transferor.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 675/2550.
The land dispute between the plaintiff and the meters are not registered by the authority. Void the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one, but when the trade is also a land dispute Land, empty-handed Village has just bought or delivered only on m and the plaintiff to possess the disputed land and then. The plaintiff would have bought or under Section 1377 and 1378, which came with a possessory right to the possession under the law. Is not acquired under the contract of sale shall m no duty to act in a way that you have to register transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued for it has no power to force a defendant to the heirs of M. m. withdraw from a disputed plot of land.
The Supreme Court 7422 - 7426/2549.
Land disputes have divided pm to petitioner as part of the five individuals who sings along with the delivery of possession of land to each petitioner to serve the land promised by the PM to register ownership. to each petitioner in the area after the petitioner each purchase, but died hours before. The process is not only the separation and transfer of land to the petitioner indicating that each land dispute pm. And sing all five. Who buy the land. They are intended to contracts and the registration of land ownership dispute in writing to the official authorities in the future. When a trading division of land is only the action was successful. The land dispute between the petitioner and five hours. It is a contract to buy and sell Trading is not done strictly prohibited. All five of the petitioner to take possession of the land in dispute is that each person possesses. It is based on the rights of possession pm, the purchase and sale agreement. Of land disputes, which take hours, not to rely instead, as the owner. When the petitioner did not appear to have changed the nature of the notice to take am not intentionally take land disputes instead of the Commercial Code, Section 1381 even if the petitioner to occupy the land dispute more than 10 consecutive years, it's not proprietary. Hostile possession by the Commercial Code, Section 1382.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7183/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant that the petition be vague Defendant never received notice to demand payment. Contract claims between the plaintiff and the Organization for Reform of Financial System (Prs.) to act outside the purpose of the plaintiff. But the Court of First Instance did not diagnose the problem. And the plaintiff did not appeal the issue to Sreouthrnntprc 3 is both law and fact that the parties have not been raised by the Supreme Court did not like the Court of Appeal Region 3 Civil Code Procedure been diagnosed according to the Article 249, paragraph one
Contract non-performing assets of Prs. Between the plaintiff and the Prs. Arising out of that. King of Financial Sector Restructuring Act 2540 Section 7 (3) empowers the Prs. Liquidator has the power company suspended operations in which the case is capital firms M. C. . C. Co., Ltd. (Thailand), because the banks and financial companies can not continue to operate. Decree and the first paragraph of Article 30 also empowers the Prs. Have the power to sell assets to liquidation of the company has more openly with the bidding. When the plaintiff is the auction of assets and loans, which the defendant is a debtor of the banks and financial companies such. The plaintiff's trade is based on. King of Financial Reform Act 2540 that the contracts are not derivatives of each other. And not an act aimed against the public order.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6315/2549.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 457 applies to the parties in the contracts. This is a matter between the buyer and the seller only The registration fee right of redemption to be paid by Por land is state money collected from farmers as compensation by the State to serve the people who Por land subject to section 104 the applicant is free of charge. Which debt incurred by the law and look at the share of debt is not paid. Without regard to the people who filed an application for registration of rights and juristic act together, the parties shall agree a fee so the plaintiff shall be entitled to call for a buyer or selling one or two of them to pay fees absent. all.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6289/2549.
Permitting defendants to fight the trade date, the parties shall not be transferable to register it. Is not a contract to buy and sell Even without paying for Point two places set to any issue in dispute. But the problem that permitting the plaintiff to sue to force the case to the Commercial Code, Section 456 is not that The law in relation with the public order. The defendant shall be entitled to raise claims of Appeals as Civil Code Procedure Section 225, paragraph two of the Court of Appeal Region 1 not get a diagnosis that is not like
Letter text in trading. Despite stating that the seller has received the deposit in the amount of one and let the buyer pay for the rest within a year, with the property that any dealing. But without any text at the intent of the parties shows that if the buyer paid full price then. Buyers and sellers are going to make a written contract and register with the authority to later. Letter of the contracts is absolutely finished. When not made correctly according to law is void under Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one of the plaintiff could not sue to enforce the trade and permitting the defendant as the trustee to transfer the disputed land.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6229/2549.
A. Land, a land dispute with a Certificate in writing to the plaintiff but did not register the transfer of rights together, but district officials intent on taking possession of land disputes and the transfer of disputed land occupied by delivering to the plaintiff. And the plaintiff to possess with intent to rely on their purchase of land disputes, so the district has ended, and the plaintiff shall have possessory right to the Commercial Code, Section 1367, 1377 and 1378 A. No owner, A. and no right to mortgage the land dispute to the two defendants because the Commercial Code, Section 705 prohibited the mortgage has no effect. Without regard to whether the defendants 2, the mortgagee innocently or not, because the right of acquisition of property shall not be raised as a defense a third party who is entitled to the charge compensation in good faith and has registered rights in good faith then. the Commercial Code, Section 1299, paragraph two must have a right to land has been registered. And the right to have the documents must be issued by the love of the land. When the title deed dispute did not like the two defendants claimed to be caused by the land did not like the accused has not Case is not governed by Section 1299 of the second paragraph of the plaintiff has the power to sue for the revocation of acts over land dispute between the district and the defendant was the second.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4767/2549.
Contract disputes indicates that car ownership in the car will fall to the buyer when the price paid in several installments as set out fully and then considered the contract terms. This title is not transferred to the buyer. Until the buyer paid full price. Trading on the condition that the property is transferred in the future together. Sellers may have owned property in the future be issued in advance. And is a function of the seller to transfer the property to the buyer. When the buyer's conditions and operations. Sellers do not need a title to the property at the time the contracts so that the plaintiff and the defendant made the contract of sale car ownership in the property dispute by the parties later on. Even when contracts are not plaintiff's ownership or title to property is not complete. Contract, it has become enforceable. The defendant refused to pay for breach of contract to the plaintiff and caused the plaintiff to terminate the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the power.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2618/2549.
Bankruptcy is a case where the plaintiff sued the defendant that the debt situations. Issue is whether the defendant has no liability or situations. This case is a separate issue with the plaintiff sued the defendant asked to enforce payment to the plaintiff in debt contracts. So it's not the same as Article 173, paragraph two P.wi.po. not a lawsuit waiting.
Agreement contract land between the defendant, one with the defendant, 2 is the defendant, a transfer of rights and responsibilities in compliance with contracts with the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is not only to transfer claims to the plaintiff. 2 only if the defendant is not subject to transfer claims it can not take the Commercial Code, Section 306 in force. However, the plaintiff and the defendant has made a second later agreed that The plaintiff and the defendant 2 has contracts soil, a soil conversion with the defendant that a contract will trade from the plaintiff and the defendant, 2 the excavation of the plaintiff to complete and then accused the two to pay the earth to the plaintiff. complete Can be considered as a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, a creditor, a debtor who the two new Would have the effect of new debt with a debtor under Section 350, which changed the debts between the plaintiff and the defendant to an end shall be suspended in accordance with Section 349, then the plaintiff has no authority to sue a defendant liable under land contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2551/2549.
A defendant disputes the plaintiff's land. The land contract disputes clause 2 states that "a contract that If the liquidation saw Or transfer of business to any person. Or the buyer does not serve this piece of land. Buyer agrees to sell back to the seller in person in accordance with Article 1 In addition, the seller agreed to be purchased in writing "is the commitment of the defendant to one that the plaintiff has the right to buy land dispute back from the defendant, one on the defendant to a dissolution of sawmill or transfer of business to others. Or do not land disputes. Such commitment is a commitment to purchase property which the law is that If there is no evidence either in writing signed by the liable party is important. Or regular place or have some debt. To sue for enforcement is not the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two law enforcement determined that such a commitment must be registered by the officials to be sued to force the case was not in any way. When the pledges made in writing and signed by the two defendants as the managing partner of the defendant to a plaintiff and a defendant's seal has sued to force the case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5915/2548.
If the buyer and the seller did not agree on fees for the sale of land set aside as something else. Buyer and seller must charge the same parties under Section 457 of the Commercial Code, when a defendant who sell land to the defendant, two buyers agreed on fees for registration and that the act. each partner equally under the deposit the purchase and sale document refers Mon 2 defendants 1 and 2 are required to pay the liability equally. The plaintiff referred to the two defendants jointly liable for the fees by not filing.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3970/2548.
9 Sreouthrnntprc ruled that permitting trade between the plaintiff and the helicopter is a contract of sale that is similar to the final contract completion. The contracts themselves are void. The plaintiff can not claim ownership of the home purchase contract of sale in accordance with it. Permit the use of land and buildings at the Department of Public Welfare agreed to allow plaintiffs to use the disputed land. Look like a rental agreement. This is the right person. The plaintiff can not force other than the parties. Defendant disputed land and houses before the plaintiff had not disputed possession of land and houses. Do not hold that the actions of the defendant disputed the plaintiff's rights under the lease. The plaintiff has no power to sue. The plaintiff's petition that the district who rent land and home to the defendant disputes. Not transfer the rights and licenses from the Department of Public Welfare has possession of the district is occupied by illegal since the beginning. And to live in a land dispute and the defendant's home is a disputed right to the plaintiff. Not an argument against the decision to sentence Sreouthrnntprc 9 in any way. The petition is not in compliance with Section 249, paragraph one of the Supreme Court Cicil Code Procedure not been diagnosed.
Contract between the plaintiff and the helicopter is a real estate contract of sale. This is absolutely one of contract completion. Form must follow the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one, if not made in writing and registered by the authority. Shall become null and void.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2675/2548.
That at a car sales contract to the plaintiff, instead of debt by converting debt to purchase a car instead. Can be considered a debt under a new Commercial Code, Section 349, first paragraph, however. Letter purchase cars such conditions are noted that while the seller does not deliver the property sold to the buyer shall be deemed to have no trade, so it considered the case of debt, which will should arise because the debt that new to did not occur. Debt was the Commercial Code, Section 351 loans are not the end of the suspension. In this case, holding that the plaintiff has the evidence of the loan book is to show then. And need not be the case that stamp duty under the income tax Grad.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1765/2548.
Disputed land is the land allocation of the second defendant cooperative contracts of land disputes are governed by the terms do not transfer. Land Allocation Act BE 2511, living first paragraph of Article 12 agreements on land disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant made within a period of 5 years from the date the defendant received a Certificate (. Nor Sor 3 Kor) aims is expressly prohibited by law. Commercial Code is void under Section 150 even though the plaintiff may take possession of land and disputes. It is considered just a land dispute on behalf of the defendant that an owner of the land dispute and the defendant, one has the right to the land to the mortgaged to the defendant, 2 the plaintiff can not be sued for the cancellation of the mortgaged land dispute between two defendants.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 736/2548.
The plaintiff is the plaintiff's accounts receivable for shares purchased from the defendant that the defendant is S. Director is authorized to act on behalf of Agriculture and land improvements with that. Its placenta and its hospital, which the plaintiff is authorized on behalf of the plaintiff. Defendant agreed to take the money, which is debtor S. Wor. to offset their share of the plaintiff to pay a fee to pay to the defendant. This case, like other debt instead of debt to be preserved under an agreement Commercial Code, Section 321, paragraph one
The plaintiff sued the defendants share a money payment returned due to break up the share purchase agreement. Find the right to sue to force the defendant to comply with the share purchase agreement is not. This case, no law on the age, especially Therefore the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 402/2548.
Letter home sale transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant is a real estate contract. When officials are not registered to void the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph one of this house was built on land owned by the State Property Ministry, so the defendant is a possessor of land and house building. only. When the defendant made an agreement to sell the land and home to the plaintiff. And delivery of land and home to the plaintiff by the plaintiff to receive compensation. So listen to the defendant taking possession of the land and house ownership transfer to the plaintiff under Section 1377 and then 1378 and the defendant shall also recognize the right of the plaintiff for a contract to lease the plaintiff. Demonstrates that the defendant take possession of land and houses instead of the plaintiff. Breach of contract when the defendant and the plaintiff does not wish to rent to the defendant in the land and home again. The plaintiff has the power to expel the defendant sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8716/2547.
The plaintiff contracted to a music rights for the accused to an amount of 200,000 baht and take notes at the end license agreement that song. If the defendant has sold, or use the copyright in musical works. Defendants will share the benefit of the plaintiff that a total of 50 percent of the funds received from the sale or use of copyright A case seen as the remuneration of Baht 200,000 specified in the contract rights in the song is too little, yet the defendant license to buy music that I do not want to pay higher, while contract Therefore choose to increase benefits from the sale of rights or permission to use copyrighted music in the musical in the future. This behavior was not a plaintiff and the defendant agreed to a joint enterprise with the intention to share profits, but business should be done in a manner that a partnership agreement establishing the Commercial Code, Section 1012 therefore does not listen. license agreement that music has made a deliberate spoof of the first plaintiff and the defendant, which is intended to camouflage into a partnership agreement under which the plaintiff claims that it is an agreement to transfer the copyright in musical works. The five plaintiffs are not the copyright owner anymore. But would be eligible for benefits under the agreement only
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3194/2547.
Defendant to the plaintiff's contract, advertising, products and goods to the plaintiff the defendant will agree to advertise a product to product. When the ads, the defendant agreed to pay advertising costs to the plaintiff. Defendant that the plaintiff is not intended to be a transfer of ownership in the property is one of the defendants. And the defendant agreed to that price. Not to look the Civil and Commercial Code Book 3 contracts with a trading style. But it is the plaintiff contractor agreed to complete the advertisement of goods to the defendant employer. And the defendant agreed to pay for advertising or Sinhgrong success of the work. Into the nature of employment made by the Commercial Code, Section 587.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 412/2547.
The plaintiff claims that the land owners and occupiers of land disputes. Defendant refused to transfer a name plaintiff in the disputed plot of land which the plaintiff's rights under Section 55 Civil Code Procedure. Although the sale of land between the plaintiff and the defendant will not be made in writing and registered by the authority which makes void any contract. But while the land sale contract is not a document of title. Only Certificate. When the defendant to deliver possession. The plaintiff shall have possessory right in land dispute When the defendant the right to dispute. The plaintiff has the power to sue
Period under Commercial Code Section 1375, paragraph two is the right time to take legal action to regain possession of the No land documents. No matter the age. This case the plaintiff sued the defendant registered the plaintiff's separate property. The plaintiff is the owner of the land. Cases, there is no competition issues which will need to possess the right to sue, which call for return of possession within a year from the time of the taking of possession. The plaintiff has the right to prosecute even when more than one year from the date on which the defendant requested the title deeds.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4961/2546.
Transfer claims, which non-performing assets in the income of the defendant to the plaintiff was forced to sue a financial institution claims to be the case in court. According to the provisions of Section 7 of the king's asset management companies. Commercial Code is not void under section 150.
The transfer of claims between the plaintiff and the Asset Management Company on Wed transferee transferee has authorized the plaintiff, a former recipient debt litigation attorney instead. Holding that the debt was assigned a representative payee and the debt charges incurred under section 9 of the king's order to transfer the claims between the plaintiff and the Asset Management Company shall be legitimate, so Wed. Law without notice to the defendant transferred to the debtor under the Commercial Code, Section 306 asset management companies are eligible Wed petition to put right as a party plaintiff was represented by its executive king. Section 7, the assets of First Instance order to allow asset management companies Wed to wear a pair of right instead of the plaintiff is well
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3952/2546.
The plaintiff and the defendant had to file the official land ownership to the land surveying division. But I can not agree. Because the plaintiff's land lost about 30 square meters of land to the plaintiff the plaintiff's 100 square but the defendant did not consent. Would hold that the right of the plaintiff argues the defendant is already The plaintiff has the power to sue
The plaintiff accused the land sale contract by the plaintiff to hold ownership of a certain area is 100 square meters for surveying the defendant on plaintiff's property divided in separate parts of their land out. Appeared to land conversion and missing 30 square meters to take the space that the defendant claimed that the missing offset from the pulp and the conversion of land to the plaintiff under the separation of land in the deed did not find it. The plaintiff has ownership of the land of 100 square meters by the real market.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2733/2546.
Contracts made between the opposition and accused the two are labeled, but only that. The opposition has sold cars of the mid to defendant 2 in Price 320,000 baht for deposit to 170,000 baht while the remaining 150,000 baht will be paid on January 29, 2541 agreement it is a contract done strictly at the break. Settlement price for two periods only, so when the contract finished. In car ownership would transfer to the second defendant, the buyer, pursuant to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 458 agreement is not conditional on a transfer of ownership under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 459 of the car owner's objections are not central. Has no right to file an objection. Request that the court has ordered returned to the car's central objection is.
