Section 349 on the parties concerned have made a promise to change things. Significant debt know that You that the debt be extinguished by the end of the conversion. If a debt with new debt terms to become debt-free conditions in good condition in more debt without a good condition. Well, you change the conditions shall be deemed a material change which the new debt, if debt with creditors to change. You shall be governed by the provisions. All of this Code on the transfer of claims.
Section 350 new debt with the debtor change. Is a contract between the creditor and debtor has a new man. But the rape made by former debtors can not find.
Section 351 if the debt should be happening because the new debt is not the place better be canceled because of bad debt information is unlawful or why one of the parties not to know better. You that the original debt. I also find no end to hold.
Section 352 parties in the new debt may be transferred or pledged. A mortgage given as security to a debt originally insured by the new debt. The extent that insurance is an object of the original debt. But such guarantees this. If a third party provider to know that Remember that you must have the consent of a third party that is transferable.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6788/2552.
Debt restructuring agreements to increase the number of debts that a defendant will be jointly liable. And change the type of debt. In the case where the plaintiff and defendant, a contract is a significant change of the debt. And agree to be bound by the contract restructuring. The new debt under the Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one of the original debt is a debt under trust receipts and 16 No. 3, guarantees the accused to be extinguished by the end of the new debt, as the three defendants. disengagement would guarantee liability.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3833/2552.
The new debt by changing the Commercial Code, Section 350 accounts, but not only that rape is done by the original debtor is not only When the testimony of the plaintiff from the defendant to make a loan Por 2, then to invest with. Por rape case to be made by the original debtor would not. When obligations under loan agreements already suspended two defendants who would guarantee free from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 698 of this case the plaintiff sued the defendant liable under the second contract is not guaranteed to force the defendant to sue for the second payment. borrow money contract. The Sreouthrnntprc 5 2 defendants sentenced to liability under the loan agreements. So too a judge other than those listed in the indictment do not liked by P.wi.po. Section 142, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3514/2551.
M. Aval Bank is the recipient of the promissory note receivable, which accounts promise to pay the game by the debtor that the agreement with the bank m will be formed to compensate the bank to bank m m to be spent according to the promissory note. that. After that, the bank and M. debtors, creditors agreed to the responsibility of the Bank Aval ticket payment. Contract amount as a receivable instead. By issuing certificates of deposit to bank m is a contract which is a significant change of the debt which the new debt. As a result, debt suspension for the following notes aval Civil and Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one of the Village Bank is not as creditors in the debt. Payable as a transferee of assets and liabilities of the bank m is not entitled to payment based on the same debt.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2569/2551.
Thi company checks dispute to reduce sales to the plaintiff by signing endorsement. Plaintiff who is lawfully After the bank refused to pay the check. Defendants who are ordered to pay and its endorsement of Rama must jointly liable to the plaintiff under Civil and Commercial Code, Section 914 and Section 967, paragraph one of Article 989 which can be considered as liable as joint debtors on the plaintiff to do so. compromise agreement, which holds that new debt is another plaintiff will have claims for payment to the Company Rama person under the compromise agreement. No right to call the company liable for debts Thi dispute the check again. The plaintiff's right to claim against the defendant as an order to pay the debt liability to the plaintiff a check would put an end to the dispute with the claim because the debt is disputed by the plaintiff's check was then suspended to the end.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2339/2551.
The Commercial Code, Section 350 law to make that promise. States that no law shall be in writing. Of the intention to offer and with the same response, it constitutes an intention to do Promise to each other now. Under the proposed terms of repayment of the Bank by the proposed transfer of land to the plaintiff valued the land price is 448,000 baht funds remaining debt contract is the recipient of 193,865.57 U.S. Bank agreed to pay its debt to. The plaintiff shall be held within two years from the date of the Agreement. Subsequently, the plaintiff may get a response by the plaintiff was transferred from the Land Bank of the plaintiff's name in lieu of Sat, Managing Director of Bank is offering a matching response of the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff has already transferred the land by putting a Sat transfer debt does not appear that the debtor rape in any way. It is a legitimate debt by debt and Commercial Code, Section 350 is to be extinguished by the end of the new debt under Commercial Code Section 349.
Facts in the case did not have any reason to doubt anymore that there is no contract to be made in writing until the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 366, paragraph two, because the plaintiff agrees to accept transfer of land from being put Thor. Sat as a managing director of the plaintiff instead. It is intended to serve as the company would then offer the Bank of the contract, but the time when notice of the proposed response to the Commercial Code, Section 361 without must be in writing. Debts between the plaintiff and the defendant then be extinguished.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1783/2551.
Issuance of promissory notes. And the interest rate of 16 percent per year, it agreed to the Commercial Code, Section 911, 968 (a) includes Section 985, which the law does not place any restrictions on it but the parties will agree. Are not lending money within the meaning of Act, Do not run up interest rates and the rates specified in the promissory note rate of 16 percent per year, it is not known if the interest rate is more than an offense under this Act and do not require. prohibited under the Commercial Code, Section 654 promissory notes and accrued interest under the action can not be null and void.
When the Court's order in Case No. F red 8 / 2542 with the approval of its reorganization plan Por the plaintiff, a debtor and creditor must file an application for debt recovery in business under the conditions specified in The Bankruptcy Act. The plaintiff's testimony confirmed that they have not received payment from this company Por the defendant argues that plaintiff can not attest to receive payment and then. Filing obligations under the promissory note is not compulsory. Filing an application for repayment in case the reorganization is the only way according to Law is not new debt. When the promissory note debt are not compulsory. The defendant must be guaranteed by aval jointly liable Por the ticket with
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3828/2550.
Defendant hired plaintiff to install a weld material. The plaintiff set up and delivered to the defendant at all, but a defendant fails to pay wages at a rest and return the deposit to the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that the work not completed due to leakage of water at all times. The plaintiff and the defendant made a memorandum of agreement that a defendant will pay the remaining guaranteed money and work to the plaintiff if the defendant received a salary in the final of the Sports Authority of Thailand Is set to change the rules pay the remaining money and guarantees that a defendant must pay to the plaintiff only Not change the essence of what the debt will be a new debt. Result of obligations under contract to the end of compulsory installation. But the agreement also notes the effect that will force each other. When a defendant has not been paid the last installment of the Sports Authority of Thailand The plaintiff sued the debt is not paid at maturity. The plaintiff is not the right argument has no authority to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3209/2550.
Por the plaintiff as a partner in the sale of land to the defendant. Defendants have no money to pay for land in the land increased. However, the defendant agreed to accept transfer of ownership by signing the loan agreement to sell the loans, stating that the defendant was the plaintiff to recover money from the sale will pay the price of land in the area and that too from the purchase and sale agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to sign the loan agreement as the lender and the defendant committed.
The original debt agreement is a contract to buy and sell land, together. The defendants do not have enough money to pay part of the land beyond the flesh. Has agreed to loan agreements to pay debts in excess of cost of land. Constitute a significant conversion of debt. This new debt agreement to buy and sell land by a loan agreement. The lender in a position to sell as well. The debt in this change was not payable. The new debt is not payable by the change to be governed by the provisions. On the transfer claims the defendant is liable for payments under loan agreements to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 393/2550.
And permitting the defendant to a state debt, a debtor to the plaintiff, a creditor is only regarded as a debt to the plaintiff and the settlement. Not cancel insurance or guarantees. Or a new debt which will result in the debt was extinguished. When the second defendant as a guarantor confess joint debtors in the debt of a defendant remains liable to the plaintiff under the contract guarantee.
The Supreme Court 5387 - 5388/2550.
Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant is the plaintiff's condition in a manner intended to work for the plaintiff to the defendant to be completed first and then the construction cost with less debt debt settlement check issued after the case. Construction or debt service on the defendant to the plaintiff is required to withdraw the plaintiff filed this lawsuit. N / A indicates that plaintiff at any settlement agreement or waiver to the defendant in criminal proceedings immediately in any way. Is not a compromise for the right to bring criminal action to suspend P.wi.o. Section 39 (2).
The agreement is that plaintiff's unilateral debt relief to the defendant are not permitted to give to each other. Is not a compromise agreement. The debt was not extinguished by check. Then the new debt under the compromise agreement does not change the essence of what the debt is not a new debt which will make debt was extinguished in any way. When the defendant does not dispute payment of checks to issue four plaintiffs. Debt and to issue a check for payment is not bound by the end. Act on the offense caused by the check out section 7 cases are not the same.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1732/2550.
Guarantees the defendant made payments under the contract liable to the plaintiff damages of g and g, but when the plaintiff entered into a compromise with the g will be liable for damages and liability arising from the contract a. liable damage and the defendant's liability as guarantor, and make it compulsory for the following a. liable to the plaintiff under a compromise agreement under Commercial Code Section 850 and 852 g on the liability of the plaintiff is liable to change the compromise agreement. Defendant as the guarantor is liable to break away from their debts because of a. contract liable to damage the end and then suspended in accordance with Section 698.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7943/2549.
Debtor is bound by contract to buy and sell units to create any liability payable by the liner to prevent the leak from the upstairs already. The creditors can not contract insurance of new leaks with Tor, a third party. If new debt is not changed by changing the debtors to make debt was suspended.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6346/2549.
Or his father entrusted to the defendant to the plaintiff to represent the state land lease request from the Treasury Department and U.S. 4,000,000 to provide funds for the accused to a handling fee and rental. Defendant represents the district where the defendant received money from the district is the money that the defendant admitted on the agent by which the defendant promised to return it because the business office representatives did not accomplish. Defendant has a duty to send the funds to the district, which is under the Commercial Code, Section 810, paragraph one of the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to a loan agreement together. Plaintiff to the defendant, stating that loans equal the amount the defendant is required to return to the district thus changed the new debt is payable from the plaintiff, A. and change agents to contract debts are debts under loan agreements. The new debt with creditors to change the Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph three that have come into force with the provisions of the Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one on the transfer of claims must be made in writing. But did not appear to have been transferred Tue existing debt to the defendant to the plaintiff by his writing. Is not a complete transfer of debt. Although the district will be assigned to the plaintiff's action is all about. The plaintiff is a representative district as a whole does not appear that the school district operates with a plaintiff will be considered as a representative plaintiff with the defendant. And the loan agreement did not appear to district involved with the witness or participate in any way When the defendants are not liable for the debt to the plaintiff would not have to convert the existing debt as debt under the loan agreements. Plaintiff has no authority to sue, the defendant liable for payment under the loan agreements.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6031/2549.
Debt was changed into a loan agreement by indict This new debt with the Commercial Code, Section 350 accounts change to bind the defendant liable under the contract and loan guarantees to the plaintiff. Claim that the defendant did not receive funds under a loan agreement not to deny liability.
To attest that the new debt. Attest to the source of the obligations under the loan agreement not to sue is prohibited.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2618/2549.
Agreement contract land between the defendant, one with the defendant, 2 is the defendant, a transfer of rights and responsibilities in compliance with contracts with the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is not only to transfer claims to the plaintiff. 2 only if the defendant is not subject to transfer claims it can not take the Commercial Code, Section 306 in force. However, the plaintiff and the defendant has made a second later agreed that The plaintiff and the defendant 2 has contracts soil, a soil conversion with the defendant that a contract will trade from the plaintiff and the defendant, 2 the excavation of the plaintiff to complete and then accused the two to pay the earth to the plaintiff. complete Can be considered as a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, a creditor, a debtor who the two new Would have the effect of new debt with a debtor under Section 350, which changed the debts between the plaintiff and the defendant to an end shall be suspended in accordance with Section 349, then the plaintiff has no authority to sue a defendant liable under land contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6053/2548.
The defendant hired to represent am a. damages from the defendant, a contract to borrow the equivalent hours that the new debt from the debt is hired to do the loans. Employment of a debt is extinguished by the new debt under Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one, when the defendant terminated the contract with the hours before the loan transfer am the plaintiff claims. Obligations under loan agreements, so am unable to stop transfer of the plaintiff's claims in the complaint confirmed that the suspension gone to the plaintiff. Plaintiff has no authority to loan agreements that force the defendant to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3847/2548.
The defendant made a contract with the plaintiff that the defendant, an agreement that allowed the defendant to join a settlement with the tenant phone service. Telephone line was not releasing the parties from liability under the original agreement. And not the plaintiff is entitled to suspend the service under the regulations of the Telephone Organization. The agreement is not changing the original debtor. Without changing the original debtor is not a new debt agreement with the debtor change. Agreement was not suspended. And the first defendant, a third party is not bound to debtors to pay debts of the plaintiff is not a liability. It is a type of contract between the defendant and the plaintiff that a contract is made voluntarily.
Section 350 new debt with the debtor change. Is a contract between the creditor and debtor has a new man. But the rape made by former debtors can not find.
Section 351 if the debt should be happening because the new debt is not the place better be canceled because of bad debt information is unlawful or why one of the parties not to know better. You that the original debt. I also find no end to hold.
Section 352 parties in the new debt may be transferred or pledged. A mortgage given as security to a debt originally insured by the new debt. The extent that insurance is an object of the original debt. But such guarantees this. If a third party provider to know that Remember that you must have the consent of a third party that is transferable.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6788/2552.
Debt restructuring agreements to increase the number of debts that a defendant will be jointly liable. And change the type of debt. In the case where the plaintiff and defendant, a contract is a significant change of the debt. And agree to be bound by the contract restructuring. The new debt under the Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one of the original debt is a debt under trust receipts and 16 No. 3, guarantees the accused to be extinguished by the end of the new debt, as the three defendants. disengagement would guarantee liability.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3833/2552.
The new debt by changing the Commercial Code, Section 350 accounts, but not only that rape is done by the original debtor is not only When the testimony of the plaintiff from the defendant to make a loan Por 2, then to invest with. Por rape case to be made by the original debtor would not. When obligations under loan agreements already suspended two defendants who would guarantee free from liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 698 of this case the plaintiff sued the defendant liable under the second contract is not guaranteed to force the defendant to sue for the second payment. borrow money contract. The Sreouthrnntprc 5 2 defendants sentenced to liability under the loan agreements. So too a judge other than those listed in the indictment do not liked by P.wi.po. Section 142, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3514/2551.
M. Aval Bank is the recipient of the promissory note receivable, which accounts promise to pay the game by the debtor that the agreement with the bank m will be formed to compensate the bank to bank m m to be spent according to the promissory note. that. After that, the bank and M. debtors, creditors agreed to the responsibility of the Bank Aval ticket payment. Contract amount as a receivable instead. By issuing certificates of deposit to bank m is a contract which is a significant change of the debt which the new debt. As a result, debt suspension for the following notes aval Civil and Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one of the Village Bank is not as creditors in the debt. Payable as a transferee of assets and liabilities of the bank m is not entitled to payment based on the same debt.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2569/2551.
Thi company checks dispute to reduce sales to the plaintiff by signing endorsement. Plaintiff who is lawfully After the bank refused to pay the check. Defendants who are ordered to pay and its endorsement of Rama must jointly liable to the plaintiff under Civil and Commercial Code, Section 914 and Section 967, paragraph one of Article 989 which can be considered as liable as joint debtors on the plaintiff to do so. compromise agreement, which holds that new debt is another plaintiff will have claims for payment to the Company Rama person under the compromise agreement. No right to call the company liable for debts Thi dispute the check again. The plaintiff's right to claim against the defendant as an order to pay the debt liability to the plaintiff a check would put an end to the dispute with the claim because the debt is disputed by the plaintiff's check was then suspended to the end.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2339/2551.
The Commercial Code, Section 350 law to make that promise. States that no law shall be in writing. Of the intention to offer and with the same response, it constitutes an intention to do Promise to each other now. Under the proposed terms of repayment of the Bank by the proposed transfer of land to the plaintiff valued the land price is 448,000 baht funds remaining debt contract is the recipient of 193,865.57 U.S. Bank agreed to pay its debt to. The plaintiff shall be held within two years from the date of the Agreement. Subsequently, the plaintiff may get a response by the plaintiff was transferred from the Land Bank of the plaintiff's name in lieu of Sat, Managing Director of Bank is offering a matching response of the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff has already transferred the land by putting a Sat transfer debt does not appear that the debtor rape in any way. It is a legitimate debt by debt and Commercial Code, Section 350 is to be extinguished by the end of the new debt under Commercial Code Section 349.
Facts in the case did not have any reason to doubt anymore that there is no contract to be made in writing until the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 366, paragraph two, because the plaintiff agrees to accept transfer of land from being put Thor. Sat as a managing director of the plaintiff instead. It is intended to serve as the company would then offer the Bank of the contract, but the time when notice of the proposed response to the Commercial Code, Section 361 without must be in writing. Debts between the plaintiff and the defendant then be extinguished.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1783/2551.
Issuance of promissory notes. And the interest rate of 16 percent per year, it agreed to the Commercial Code, Section 911, 968 (a) includes Section 985, which the law does not place any restrictions on it but the parties will agree. Are not lending money within the meaning of Act, Do not run up interest rates and the rates specified in the promissory note rate of 16 percent per year, it is not known if the interest rate is more than an offense under this Act and do not require. prohibited under the Commercial Code, Section 654 promissory notes and accrued interest under the action can not be null and void.
When the Court's order in Case No. F red 8 / 2542 with the approval of its reorganization plan Por the plaintiff, a debtor and creditor must file an application for debt recovery in business under the conditions specified in The Bankruptcy Act. The plaintiff's testimony confirmed that they have not received payment from this company Por the defendant argues that plaintiff can not attest to receive payment and then. Filing obligations under the promissory note is not compulsory. Filing an application for repayment in case the reorganization is the only way according to Law is not new debt. When the promissory note debt are not compulsory. The defendant must be guaranteed by aval jointly liable Por the ticket with
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3828/2550.
Defendant hired plaintiff to install a weld material. The plaintiff set up and delivered to the defendant at all, but a defendant fails to pay wages at a rest and return the deposit to the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that the work not completed due to leakage of water at all times. The plaintiff and the defendant made a memorandum of agreement that a defendant will pay the remaining guaranteed money and work to the plaintiff if the defendant received a salary in the final of the Sports Authority of Thailand Is set to change the rules pay the remaining money and guarantees that a defendant must pay to the plaintiff only Not change the essence of what the debt will be a new debt. Result of obligations under contract to the end of compulsory installation. But the agreement also notes the effect that will force each other. When a defendant has not been paid the last installment of the Sports Authority of Thailand The plaintiff sued the debt is not paid at maturity. The plaintiff is not the right argument has no authority to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3209/2550.
Por the plaintiff as a partner in the sale of land to the defendant. Defendants have no money to pay for land in the land increased. However, the defendant agreed to accept transfer of ownership by signing the loan agreement to sell the loans, stating that the defendant was the plaintiff to recover money from the sale will pay the price of land in the area and that too from the purchase and sale agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to sign the loan agreement as the lender and the defendant committed.
The original debt agreement is a contract to buy and sell land, together. The defendants do not have enough money to pay part of the land beyond the flesh. Has agreed to loan agreements to pay debts in excess of cost of land. Constitute a significant conversion of debt. This new debt agreement to buy and sell land by a loan agreement. The lender in a position to sell as well. The debt in this change was not payable. The new debt is not payable by the change to be governed by the provisions. On the transfer claims the defendant is liable for payments under loan agreements to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 393/2550.
And permitting the defendant to a state debt, a debtor to the plaintiff, a creditor is only regarded as a debt to the plaintiff and the settlement. Not cancel insurance or guarantees. Or a new debt which will result in the debt was extinguished. When the second defendant as a guarantor confess joint debtors in the debt of a defendant remains liable to the plaintiff under the contract guarantee.
The Supreme Court 5387 - 5388/2550.
Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant is the plaintiff's condition in a manner intended to work for the plaintiff to the defendant to be completed first and then the construction cost with less debt debt settlement check issued after the case. Construction or debt service on the defendant to the plaintiff is required to withdraw the plaintiff filed this lawsuit. N / A indicates that plaintiff at any settlement agreement or waiver to the defendant in criminal proceedings immediately in any way. Is not a compromise for the right to bring criminal action to suspend P.wi.o. Section 39 (2).
The agreement is that plaintiff's unilateral debt relief to the defendant are not permitted to give to each other. Is not a compromise agreement. The debt was not extinguished by check. Then the new debt under the compromise agreement does not change the essence of what the debt is not a new debt which will make debt was extinguished in any way. When the defendant does not dispute payment of checks to issue four plaintiffs. Debt and to issue a check for payment is not bound by the end. Act on the offense caused by the check out section 7 cases are not the same.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1732/2550.
Guarantees the defendant made payments under the contract liable to the plaintiff damages of g and g, but when the plaintiff entered into a compromise with the g will be liable for damages and liability arising from the contract a. liable damage and the defendant's liability as guarantor, and make it compulsory for the following a. liable to the plaintiff under a compromise agreement under Commercial Code Section 850 and 852 g on the liability of the plaintiff is liable to change the compromise agreement. Defendant as the guarantor is liable to break away from their debts because of a. contract liable to damage the end and then suspended in accordance with Section 698.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7943/2549.
Debtor is bound by contract to buy and sell units to create any liability payable by the liner to prevent the leak from the upstairs already. The creditors can not contract insurance of new leaks with Tor, a third party. If new debt is not changed by changing the debtors to make debt was suspended.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6346/2549.
Or his father entrusted to the defendant to the plaintiff to represent the state land lease request from the Treasury Department and U.S. 4,000,000 to provide funds for the accused to a handling fee and rental. Defendant represents the district where the defendant received money from the district is the money that the defendant admitted on the agent by which the defendant promised to return it because the business office representatives did not accomplish. Defendant has a duty to send the funds to the district, which is under the Commercial Code, Section 810, paragraph one of the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to a loan agreement together. Plaintiff to the defendant, stating that loans equal the amount the defendant is required to return to the district thus changed the new debt is payable from the plaintiff, A. and change agents to contract debts are debts under loan agreements. The new debt with creditors to change the Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph three that have come into force with the provisions of the Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one on the transfer of claims must be made in writing. But did not appear to have been transferred Tue existing debt to the defendant to the plaintiff by his writing. Is not a complete transfer of debt. Although the district will be assigned to the plaintiff's action is all about. The plaintiff is a representative district as a whole does not appear that the school district operates with a plaintiff will be considered as a representative plaintiff with the defendant. And the loan agreement did not appear to district involved with the witness or participate in any way When the defendants are not liable for the debt to the plaintiff would not have to convert the existing debt as debt under the loan agreements. Plaintiff has no authority to sue, the defendant liable for payment under the loan agreements.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6031/2549.
Debt was changed into a loan agreement by indict This new debt with the Commercial Code, Section 350 accounts change to bind the defendant liable under the contract and loan guarantees to the plaintiff. Claim that the defendant did not receive funds under a loan agreement not to deny liability.
To attest that the new debt. Attest to the source of the obligations under the loan agreement not to sue is prohibited.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2618/2549.
Agreement contract land between the defendant, one with the defendant, 2 is the defendant, a transfer of rights and responsibilities in compliance with contracts with the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is not only to transfer claims to the plaintiff. 2 only if the defendant is not subject to transfer claims it can not take the Commercial Code, Section 306 in force. However, the plaintiff and the defendant has made a second later agreed that The plaintiff and the defendant 2 has contracts soil, a soil conversion with the defendant that a contract will trade from the plaintiff and the defendant, 2 the excavation of the plaintiff to complete and then accused the two to pay the earth to the plaintiff. complete Can be considered as a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, a creditor, a debtor who the two new Would have the effect of new debt with a debtor under Section 350, which changed the debts between the plaintiff and the defendant to an end shall be suspended in accordance with Section 349, then the plaintiff has no authority to sue a defendant liable under land contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6053/2548.
The defendant hired to represent am a. damages from the defendant, a contract to borrow the equivalent hours that the new debt from the debt is hired to do the loans. Employment of a debt is extinguished by the new debt under Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one, when the defendant terminated the contract with the hours before the loan transfer am the plaintiff claims. Obligations under loan agreements, so am unable to stop transfer of the plaintiff's claims in the complaint confirmed that the suspension gone to the plaintiff. Plaintiff has no authority to loan agreements that force the defendant to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3847/2548.
The defendant made a contract with the plaintiff that the defendant, an agreement that allowed the defendant to join a settlement with the tenant phone service. Telephone line was not releasing the parties from liability under the original agreement. And not the plaintiff is entitled to suspend the service under the regulations of the Telephone Organization. The agreement is not changing the original debtor. Without changing the original debtor is not a new debt agreement with the debtor change. Agreement was not suspended. And the first defendant, a third party is not bound to debtors to pay debts of the plaintiff is not a liability. It is a type of contract between the defendant and the plaintiff that a contract is made voluntarily.
