Section 303 claims that he should transfer to each other. Blank space, but the condition of the right itself is not opening up to alienable
Of the foregoing shall not apply. If the parties have expressed their intention is something else like that this intention. You are prohibited from picking up a defense. Third parties who act in good faith.
Section 304 claims such a thing. The court may order the seizure by law can not Claims like that. You will find not transferable.
Section 305 on the transfer of claims. With the right mortgage or pledge. Is associated with the claim that good. Rights guaranteed to happen, but to claim it for good. Would fall to such a transferee.
Furthermore assignee of any preferential rights to use their existing concerning the claims. In case of confiscation or forced bankruptcy that right.
Section 306 would transfer the debt should be paid to creditors by a particular person that If not in writing. Furthermore, you did not complete the transfer of debt, you will raise a defense to the debtor or third party. But when a notice of transfer to the debtors. Or the debtor can consent to the transfer. Notice or consent, such as this you have to do a book.
If the debtor enough to make hearts by using the money transfer. Or by other means. Waste, but before receiving the notice. Or before, have agreed to the transfer of know that Debtor, it shall be free from debt.
Section 307 if the transfer of disputed claims in other cases the transfer of any. Prior notice or agreement. Shall have the right to transfer more than any other transfer.
Section 308 if the debtor has given such consent in Section 306 by not reluctant to say or do anything You will have to set up a defense up against the transferor by the transferee is not. But to hold debt, debtor makes payment to the assignor. Asrng debtor to recover the money it has. If for example, mentioned that The burden of debt accounts for one of the new transfer will be construed as if the debt is not created at all.
If a debtor but has received notice of transfer You have the debtor. Against the transferor before the time Just as it was told. I will raise up to. A defense to the transferee in a similar way If the debtor has the right to claim from the transferor. But rights are not yet due at the time you notice that removes Asrng claims that the offset each time. If such rights are due. Are due no later than the time of the claim which has been transferred to it.
Section 309 of the transfer of debt should be paid according to his order that would lift him up as a defense accounts. Or other third parties, but specifically When the transfer is endorsed in the instrument. And the instrument is delivered. Transferred to the recipient with
Section 310 of the debt should be paid according to their order. Debtor is entitled. The investigation of the instrument holder. Or investigate the accuracy. The signature or seal holder has. But for a commitment to do just that to not However, if the debtor fraudulently or recklessly. Inadvertent seriously know that Settlement, it shall not complete.
Section 311 provisions of this section before you make any use of force. The case of the creditors listed in the instrument. This is the message noted. That the debt instrument to the holder.
Section 312 of the debt should be paid by him to order the debtor to set up a defense which is the same as any creditor against a transferee in good faith to find it. Not unless it appears in the instrument itself. Or some of the common According the nature of the instrument.
Section 313 provisions of this section before you make apply to all debts should be paid to the shareholders that the case may be.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1234/2552.
Letter of consent and acknowledged the transfer of claims between the defendants 1 to the plaintiff that the defendant 4 was to the defendant at one that read, "It is understood that AT & T (AT & T), but respond to. ask you to pay money directly in your name to other companies and to pay this. AT & T will not and must not accept an increased liability to you or to the Assignee addition to allowing the transfer of financial rights. Does not mean any reasons that AT & T taking of their rights contained in the contract, "such statements clearly show that the four defendants did not consent to the transfer of claims by not reluctant to say or do anything But a consent within the framework of the rights of the defendant, 4 which would be made in a contract between the defendant, one with the defendant, 4 Therefore, if the defendant 4 was a defense to the defendant at first, it shall be entitled to raise against the plaintiff, which are transferee from the defendant claims that a defendant who was transferred to 4 are eligible to apply total amount. U.S. 13,522,469.67 of set-off with pay. 11,610,539.33 Baht 4 defendant is required to pay for a defendant to a cause of the debt extinguished. The plaintiff, as assignee of the defendant claims that a transferor has no right to demand the payment of four defendants. 11,610,539.33 baht to her.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5574/2551.
Despite an agreement to buy land with buildings between S. and the defendant is a reciprocal agreement. Both parties have as a debtor and creditor and debtor. That is, the defendant as a creditor to transfer land and buildings from Sat, which is in the debtor to transfer land to a defendant. At the same time as the defendant is a debtor to pay debts land. Sat building to the creditors in order to receive payment for land with buildings from the defendant, but when the facts show that the S. part of their debt to the defendant is already before the S. Claims will be transferred to the plaintiff. The transfer of claims between the plaintiff Sat, thus transferring only the claims as a creditor only. Transfer in this manner, when it was made in writing and forwarded to the notice of the defendant would have completed the Commercial Code, Section 306, first paragraph, the defendant is liable for repayment plus interest to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2408/2551.
Transfer the defendant to a claim that a defendant has the debtor of a defendant to the plaintiff and the plaintiff agreed to pay royalties from the transfer of claims to the defendant to transfer a claim under P.po. Wed. . Section 303 and 306, so the plaintiff shall have the right to claim repayment from the debtors of the defendant took an in behalf of the plaintiff. But when the transfer of claims that the defendant first made to the plaintiff has an agreement in article 6 that "if customers refuse to pay debts or unable to pay its debts, in whole or in part, or the customer does not need to pay debt is not that prior to the trip. To the transferee. The transfer agreement allows compensation for damages caused by the transfer to the claims. Transfer is equal to the amount of money that customers do not pay the debt with debt. Interest rate of 15 percent per year from the date of default until such transferee will be required to pay debt. And the transferee will be entitled to the money deducted under clause 4 or remuneration that would have been transferred from the transfer of claims to the deductible payment. Immediately without notice to pop as the transfer of know ... "as the two defendants are also liable for payment of claims transferred to the plaintiff. The agreement followed by
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable for both the defendant's claims that a debtor has to bring a defendant to transfer to the plaintiff and the plaintiff did not receive payments under such claims from Debtor of a defendant that a defendant is liable under the contract. Thus sued the two defendants liable under the contract claim, which does not really work transfer. The old law specifically. Not the case, the plaintiff sued the enforcement of claims transferred from the defendant, a call to a debtor of the defendant, a settlement debts arising from contracts between the defendant, one with the debtor the age of 2 years to sue the plaintiff's so old. The 10-year Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 799/2551.
The plaintiff contracted to lease the land from the plaintiff the defendant. Later, the plaintiff has a letter stating that the transfer in writing, stating the claim. A contract in writing between the plaintiff and the Bank of A. that the "transfer" and "transferee", respectively, the contents of the book states that the transfer of a lessor of land. Buildings I transferred the right to receive rent from the defendant each month lease to the transferee. Is the recipient of such funds. The transferor hereby certify that Transferee as the transferor has the right to complete in all respects. And a notice of transfer in writing to the defendant and the defendant has accepted in writing. Transfer book claims the right to claim transfer of land rental contracts. Between the plaintiff and the defendant, which is the lease that the plaintiff brought a lawsuit filed this A. Bank determines that the plaintiff and conducted according to the transfer of claims under the Commercial Code, Section 303, paragraph one and Section 306 provisions. Claims of the plaintiff to receive money for rent is vested in the Bank of A. Since then find it is the plaintiff's attorney to the payee bank a. rent instead of the plaintiff is not the plaintiff has no power to force the defendant to sue for. Pay rent to the plaintiff.
District Court asked the parties on the facts of that case law on the issue enough diagnostic power of the plaintiff to sue now. Has to decide the preliminary issue in accordance with Section 24, Civil Code Procedure. Court of First Instance held that the decision on the issue of the case and the reasoning of the decision is clear to all. Although a final decision on the issue in the report of the case proceedings. It does not make errors of fact, judgments, and unlawful under Section 141 P.wi.po. in any way.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 764/2551.
That a defendant has been paid in advance from the opposition 15 percent of the wages received under the contract will go before Enforcement Officer Report attached to the objection. The funds are vested in the defendant, a defendant that a right will be used in the construction of the contract the defendant, one is required to return to the opposition only in case of failing to comply with the contract only defendant 1 is marked as a receivable. of objection and no claim to any dissenter Paid in advance that a defendant was not given to the opposition in the nature of the objection will be sent to the plaintiff for the Enforcement Officer attached to. The plaintiff has no right to request that the objection to the execution of the salary as a pre-judgment debtor.
Transfer agreement between the defendant claims that a bank indicated that It is well understood between the parties that the claims transferred under the contract to claim that this is not certain that it can be called out from Chiang Mai University, who has opposed the amount of how much Because depending on the conditions or practices specified in the contract is not considered a challenge to transfer this claim with other obligations, which will allow the user to transfer existing debt to the transferee to hold or in part. all In case the transferee does not receive funds from the challenge or are insufficient to pay all existing debt. The transfer is still bound to pay the debt to the transferee in full. Text in the agreement indicates that the claim is transferred to the same fees as well as K with Practice, the objector to pay to K. As a result, a defendant is a waiver claim on the bank of a defendant and the only objection. Find the plaintiff has the right to freeze the money was announced that a defendant be transferred to the Bank not to. The plaintiff has no right to request that the case for the opposing force. As a debtor under the Supreme Court under Article 312, paragraph two Civil Code Procedure.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6517/2550.
The plaintiff claims in the transfer of debt under the Supreme Court in a civil case against the defendant company to B. Such claims are not claims of the plaintiff no longer the Commercial Code, Section 303, when the prosecution asked. bankruptcy after the defendant transferred plaintiff claims, then plaintiff has no authority to sue Issues such as legal issues in relation with public order. Supreme Court decision has raised itself by Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5), 246, 247 of the Bankruptcy Court Act and the Bankruptcy Court's Section 28.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6507/2550.
The four defendants liable under the contract and loan guarantees to banks and financial companies transferred Sat plaintiff claims that banks and financial companies are on Sat and was told all four defendants to transfer claims to all four defendants. already The plaintiff shall be entitled to claim all four defendants to pay debts by loan agreements and contracts. Guaranteed by the plaintiff and Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, whether the four defendants will agree with it or not.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6334/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 303 and Section 306, paragraph one of the first paragraph states that the debt is not paid by the debtor in default is not transferable. And the transferee shall have an interest in the transferred debt. Although the transfer of claims between the plaintiff shall be payable after the defendant defaulted. Debt, and plaintiff has no interest in such debt. It is not about trade, and not contrary to public order. Once the transfer claim is made in writing and the plaintiff had notice of transfer To the defendant as a debtor under Section 306 of the first paragraph. Shall be valid and the defendant lean. The plaintiff as assignee, which shall be payable instead of the original creditor claims. The existing debt from the defendant. Has the power to force the plaintiff sued the defendant to pay such debts.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2894/2550.
Defendant sold a fertilizer by issuing orders for products to customers to cooperate with the customers to pick products such as fertilizer, draft a document that builds trust in the tradition. A commercial fertilizer that the defendant promised to deliver fertilizer to the fertilizer leader orders the product from the first defendant and the defendant, a customer who has an agreement to buy fertilizer by default from the beginning that Buyers can transfer orders goods to any person and the defendant, one to deliver fertilizer to the leading orders exhibitors in the delivery of draft products to the customers do not have to endorse and sign the draft product but delivered to only show that the buyer has received goods from the defendant to draft a draft product that can be transferred to other parties continue. Without the consent of the defendant, a transfer and need not endorse the transfer of product orders. Transfer the right to receive the fertilizer between the plaintiff and the defendant is to transfer a debt which should be paid to the holders of the Commercial Code, Section 312, Section 313 plaintiffs who possess such goods orders. Can lead to the withdrawal or fertilizer from a defendant, the defendant has a personal reason to raise the customer orders the goods from a defendant and the defendant to two to refuse delivery of fertilizer to the plaintiff can not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5829/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant hired two limited partnerships Sat construction of road and drainage system. Sat Partnership believes construction materials purchased. And advance to the loan from the plaintiff to be used in a total amount of 778,240 baht was transferred Sat Partnership claims to get money from construction period to a value of 800,000 Baht, the plaintiff shall Sat Partnership all right. to receive payments under the contract immediately. Two defendants to pay debts to the plaintiff, the creditor directly. Sat Partnership has no right not to hold the two defendants to pay the plaintiff. Two defendants could not reject liability claims in writing to the Partnership Sat two defendants to stop paying before, which did not cause the plaintiff may be received by the plaintiff is entitled to receive Considered the two defendants have disputed the rights of the plaintiff already The plaintiff has the power to sue
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4872/2550.
Transfer of the defendant claims to be paid by the petitioner under the compromise agreement in the case before the Court of First Instance to the T. The company said a notice of transfer of claims to know who sings it. Transfer claims this would complete the Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, and if the transfer of this claim has not been canceled by prefer. The defendant's right to receive payment from the petitioner, a debtor under the Supreme Court in the case before it would become the property of T. defendant has no right to receive the sentence of the petitioner in that case then. The plaintiff has no right to cancel such claims. Enforcement Officer of the order attached claims to the petitioner is not like it. Petitioner has the right to petition to cancel the order revoking it.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 815/2550.
AM Aval Bank as the recipient makes payment of promissory notes to the Privy Purse Office, the Bank shall have the right hours, which will take recourse to the debtor, a person in accordance with their insurance last year. CCC Section 940 paragraph three of Section 985 and includes a case where no law specifically prescription. Therefore the age of 10 years under section 193/30 on the transfer of creditor claims on the promissory note debt from Aval Bank hours shall be entitled to claim creditors a debtor to pay the debt within the statute of the above as well.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6346/2549.
Or his father entrusted to the defendant to the plaintiff to represent the state land lease request from the Treasury Department and U.S. 4,000,000 to provide funds for the accused to a handling fee and rental. Defendant represents the district where the defendant received money from the district is the money that the defendant admitted on the agent by which the defendant promised to return it because the business office representatives did not accomplish. Defendant has a duty to send the funds to the district, which is under the Commercial Code, Section 810, paragraph one of the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to a loan agreement together. Plaintiff to the defendant, stating that loans equal the amount the defendant is required to return to the district thus changed the new debt is payable from the plaintiff, A. and change agents to contract debts are debts under loan agreements. The new debt with creditors to change the Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph three that have come into force with the provisions of the Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one on the transfer of claims must be made in writing. But did not appear to have been transferred Tue existing debt to the defendant to the plaintiff by his writing. Is not a complete transfer of debt. Although the district will be assigned to the plaintiff's action is all about. The plaintiff is a representative district as a whole does not appear that the school district operates with a plaintiff will be considered as a representative plaintiff with the defendant. And the loan agreement did not appear to district involved with the witness or participate in any way When the defendants are not liable for the debt to the plaintiff would not have to convert the existing debt as debt under the loan agreements. Plaintiff has no authority to sue, the defendant liable for payment under the loan agreements.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5842/2549.
Under Section 271 Civil Code Procedure. plaintiff took the case to enforce the two defendants, within 10 years from the date of the sentence. Although petitioner was transferred to the plaintiff's claims by auction claims this comes from Official receivership. Petitioner has the right to exist as a plaintiff. Petitioner is forced to fall into the required execution within 10 years from the date on which the plaintiff may allow execution under the sentence.
Allow any person to become a party in a case under Section 57 Civil Code Procedure. discretion of the court to consider the needs and convenience of the hearing. When the petitioner is not entitled to enforce the case may take up to two defendants because of the time under the law. If there is no reason to allow the petitioner to the creditors the right to wear the sentence instead of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4247/2549.
Fax Sterling contract that the defendant company to a debt which the defendant has a right to claim a debt from a third party and not yet due for sale to the plaintiff. The agreements can be concluded that a defendant is not involved in billing and issue a receipt to the debtor in debt sold to the defendant, a plaintiff already If the debtor be paid to the defendant, a defendant must first be presented to the plaintiff. Shows that when a defendant to any debt sold to the plaintiff already One plaintiff who has the authority to do so to receive payment. And receive payment of a defendant has no right to claim or receive payment for that debt in the next The contract is a contract transferring the right to claim under the Commercial Code, Section 303 agreements that If necessary, the plaintiff is entitled to a defendant in a prosecution, it is a method and details for a plaintiff to receive payment in the debt purchase only. Find the agreement not to transfer claims did not.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2618/2549.
Bankruptcy is a case where the plaintiff sued the defendant that the debt situations. Issue is whether the defendant has no liability or situations. This case is a separate issue with the plaintiff sued the defendant asked to enforce payment to the plaintiff in debt contracts. So it's not the same as Article 173, paragraph two P.wi.po. not a lawsuit waiting.
Agreement contract land between the defendant, one with the defendant, 2 is the defendant, a transfer of rights and responsibilities in compliance with contracts with the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is not only to transfer claims to the plaintiff. 2 only if the defendant is not subject to transfer claims it can not take the Commercial Code, Section 306 in force. However, the plaintiff and the defendant has made a second later agreed that The plaintiff and the defendant 2 has contracts soil, a soil conversion with the defendant that a contract will trade from the plaintiff and the defendant, 2 the excavation of the plaintiff to complete and then accused the two to pay the earth to the plaintiff. complete Can be considered as a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, a creditor, a debtor who the two new Would have the effect of new debt with a debtor under Section 350, which changed the debts between the plaintiff and the defendant to an end shall be suspended in accordance with Section 349, then the plaintiff has no authority to sue a defendant liable under land contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5391/2548.
Asset Management plaintiff assigned payee bank a. Audio All Formats are the original bill and receive payment. Thus the plaintiff has assigned a representative payee for the same debt collection and debt settlement happens. The transfer of such claims can not be transferred to the notice of both the defendant. King's Asset Management Section 9, paragraph one, so even if the bank or the plaintiff will not be a. a written notice to the defendant to know both the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 of transfer of this claim is legitimate. law The plaintiff has the right to wear the right as a creditor under the Supreme Court in a civil settlement that will force the defendant to follow. King's Asset Management Section 7.
Court of First Instance ruled under a compromise settlement to the two defendants to the plaintiff on December 22, 2536 by payment of 1,951,461.86 U.S. with 16 per cent interest per annum paid to be completed within 6 months from the date of the compromise agreement. The rights of the plaintiff to enforce the case and the defendant will have to roll for 6 months from the date on which a compromise agreement before, so the rights of the plaintiff, to begin from the date of June 23, 2537 when the plaintiff's case the debt is the Judgement of such action. two defendants in the bankruptcy on May 31, 2547 right in the sentence of execution by the end of time does not allow enforcement under Section 271 P.wi.po. plaintiff has the right to bring the debt under the Supreme Court to sue the defendant. Second, it is a bankruptcy case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6053/2548.
The defendant hired to represent am a. damages from the defendant, a contract to borrow the equivalent hours that the new debt from the debt is hired to do the loans. Employment of a debt is extinguished by the new debt under Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one, when the defendant terminated the contract with the hours before the loan transfer am the plaintiff claims. Obligations under loan agreements, so am unable to stop transfer of the plaintiff's claims in the complaint confirmed that the suspension gone to the plaintiff. Plaintiff has no authority to loan agreements that force the defendant to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7086/2547.
Petitioner claims have been transferred under lease from the lease submitted nights of medium truck. Which has cost more than the purchase price of the remaining lots. When a lease is a lease payment of arrears. The singer refused to sing the intention that the truck's center. Which has cost more than they should have. The middle of the night and apply it as exercise in bad faith. Petitioner has no right to request the return of middle
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3316/2540.
The transfer of claims under the Civil and Commercial Code Book 2 features a category 4, it is transferred as is the original state to the transferee to be a creditor instead of did not change the rights in any way, and usually accounts have. However, creditors who originally fought raised claims against the assignee, as well as a defense, so age is the age of the debtor to raise against the assignee claims must use the same age, the debtor can raised against the original creditor who claims it is evident that in this case a wage contract of employment made between the defendant and LTD. Or, a trader calls out the work to be done, so the age of 2.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9206/2538.
The term "a defense on the transferor, under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 308 means that a defense that on the date of the transfer of claims to the defendant or the debtor knows that a defense that the date of transfer. claims, but also consent to the transfer of claims considered the defendant or the debtor taking a defense then the defendant has not raised a defense that is on the transfer of these up against the transferee, but if a defense is born. later on transferred claims shall not prejudice the right of the defendant or the debtor to set up a defense that up against the assignee claims for so while transferring claims between the plaintiff and the Wor. case the plaintiff has not. terminate the action call for wage doing of which a period of 5 years the defendant has not yet set up a battle of age and those up against the plaintiff, the assignee the right to claim later the defendant gave consent to the transfer of claims. to sing without reluctant to say or do anything and bring the case to the plaintiff to sue after the case, then terminate the defendant has the right to set up a battle of the ages that are up against the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 933/2536.
The plaintiff claims to have been transferred from the loan agreement. F. In writing and notice of transfer in writing to the debtor and the defendant. The transfer of such claims are legitimate. In case of the defendant, a debtor will be raised as a defense to the plaintiff assignee shall be a defense to the transfer of the debtor. Yes, for a defense during the transfer to the transferee if the transfer is not so indebted to the transferee or not. It is between the transferor and the transferee is not among those transferred to the defendant, a debtor Finds a defendant has the right to remove a defense raised up against the assignee has no right to claim transfer of the f. The plaintiff is well
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3973/2532.
Muang Samut Prakan Which has the right to land state land disputes location of the building. Entered into an agreement for a defendant to a commercial building. In the land by a capital defendant and transferred to Ministry of Finance. By giving the defendant the right to a lease from the Ministry of Finance for 20 years and allow the defendant. A transfer of leasehold rights to the municipal building of mosques will lead to a defendant or other person that the defendant, a transfer of leasehold rights to the lease agreement with Ministry of Finance directly on the defendant to a building already The plaintiff entered into lease disputes including 3 stand by the defendant to a later accused the three has entered into lease booths, therefore, the defendant, one another, which both the plaintiff and the defendant to three different not registered leasehold rights to the official, but according to the agreement. Whether a defendant will be provided tenant is contracting directly with the municipality of mosques. Such cases is not a sublease, but with the transfer of the defendant claims that a municipality on the mosques and Ministry of Finance. To the plaintiff or defendant. 3 do not appear on both the plaintiff and the defendant held the third notice of transfer of leasehold rights to the Municipality of mosques in mind. If it is not subject to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 307 to decide whether the plaintiff or the defendant has the right to three disputed building better, and there is no law that would raise the fine to the case directly. To bring the Civil and Commercial Section 4 to use based on relative laws similar especially the Section 543 (3) the case even if the plaintiff is a Letter of Assignment of lease dispute with the defendant at a previous defendant, 3 whether but when. 3 show that the defendant was in possession of disputed building then. Better are eligible for the plaintiff, which is not registered the lease and not to take possession of disputed building.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 857/2532.
Defendant with a contract to the defendant building renovation and building contracts Article 14 requires that "Contractor shall pay wages to an employee of the person under wage rates and the timing of the Contractor and employee agree, or contract them. If the contractor does not pay wages to an employee contract ... let the employer take the money wage employers must pay to the contractor paid to employees of contractors have. And the amount paid shall be deemed to be paid to the contractor has been hired by the then ... "to transfer the defendant claims to be paid under the contract to the petitioner. Petitioner had notice of the defendant transferred to the joint. Defendant with a written response to the petitioner that "Then do not mind the co-defendant in the transfer of claims by the petitioner to inform. However, the petitioner will pay only for the defendant will receive from the defendant under contract with such purpose, shall be equal with the argument that the defendant reserves the right to show the defendant's co-existing under the contract. As well as under Article 14 in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 308 and the rights of the petitioner to get the funds may not exceed the rights that the defendant has under contract. Co-defendant would be raised as a defense contract that they have transferred to the defendant, who was fighting against the petitioner is the transferee. Payable when the defendant paid the plaintiff, who was employed. Co-defendant would exercise the contract, 14 deducted from the wages of co-defendants must be paid to the petitioner to be paid to the plaintiff that the defendant was an employee. Petitioner has no right to claim money that the defendant exercised with less of them.
The Supreme Court 5561 - 5567/2530.
The defendant is a creditor of the Bangkok street construction accounts transferred debts or claims payment to the construction of the singer who sings in writing and sent notices to inform the transfer of a book and Bangkok. Need with a ceremony for the transfer of claims under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 transfer all claims between the defendants and the petitioner shall complete Claims arising out of, but shall transfer to the petitioner and the defendant. And allows the debtor Yan Bangkok. Employees of the plaintiff and the defendant lean, a third party without the debtor that Bangkok will be allowed to transfer it or not. The plaintiff has the right to stop payment for claims in foreign currencies are not.
Text under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 that 'the notice of transfer to the debtor or the debtor will not agree with the transfer of the' laws require only any reasons only one did not want to combine these two things to be considered. complete and transferred to lean debtor third party. Provided that Debtor will not agree with the transfer that is the case that in conjunction with Section 308, which means that if the debtor consents withoutreluctant to say or do anything stained the debtor out of the right to set up a defense which they are creditors to apply to the transferee. But for the transfer of claims to be first complied with the conditions which are not vested with full consent of the debtor not
The Supreme Court 1947 - 1950/2524.
The transfer of claims of depositors to the bank to others in any way to transfer the debt should be paid to specific creditors. Must comply with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 is said to be in writing signed by the transferor otherwise would not be complete. If you are in any way to transfer the debt should be paid as a deposit, he ordered it to perform. With the issuance of checks to the bank money and deliver such check to the transferee to withdraw money from a bank. The net transfer of money from a bank account or current account of the depositor. Not issued by a deposit check made payable to the bank money. Or a letter of transfer to a legitimate debt. Will not cause the claims of depositors in the deposit to hold debt lapse. Because demand deposit account statement indicating the current conditions of payment and withdrawal that. When a deposit is payable or withdrawal. Use a check for each bank account given to specific In order to write a paper or other printed form, except the bank will not agree with deductions from bank account to transfer money is no different what with the withdrawal.
Of the foregoing shall not apply. If the parties have expressed their intention is something else like that this intention. You are prohibited from picking up a defense. Third parties who act in good faith.
Section 304 claims such a thing. The court may order the seizure by law can not Claims like that. You will find not transferable.
Section 305 on the transfer of claims. With the right mortgage or pledge. Is associated with the claim that good. Rights guaranteed to happen, but to claim it for good. Would fall to such a transferee.
Furthermore assignee of any preferential rights to use their existing concerning the claims. In case of confiscation or forced bankruptcy that right.
Section 306 would transfer the debt should be paid to creditors by a particular person that If not in writing. Furthermore, you did not complete the transfer of debt, you will raise a defense to the debtor or third party. But when a notice of transfer to the debtors. Or the debtor can consent to the transfer. Notice or consent, such as this you have to do a book.
If the debtor enough to make hearts by using the money transfer. Or by other means. Waste, but before receiving the notice. Or before, have agreed to the transfer of know that Debtor, it shall be free from debt.
Section 307 if the transfer of disputed claims in other cases the transfer of any. Prior notice or agreement. Shall have the right to transfer more than any other transfer.
Section 308 if the debtor has given such consent in Section 306 by not reluctant to say or do anything You will have to set up a defense up against the transferor by the transferee is not. But to hold debt, debtor makes payment to the assignor. Asrng debtor to recover the money it has. If for example, mentioned that The burden of debt accounts for one of the new transfer will be construed as if the debt is not created at all.
If a debtor but has received notice of transfer You have the debtor. Against the transferor before the time Just as it was told. I will raise up to. A defense to the transferee in a similar way If the debtor has the right to claim from the transferor. But rights are not yet due at the time you notice that removes Asrng claims that the offset each time. If such rights are due. Are due no later than the time of the claim which has been transferred to it.
Section 309 of the transfer of debt should be paid according to his order that would lift him up as a defense accounts. Or other third parties, but specifically When the transfer is endorsed in the instrument. And the instrument is delivered. Transferred to the recipient with
Section 310 of the debt should be paid according to their order. Debtor is entitled. The investigation of the instrument holder. Or investigate the accuracy. The signature or seal holder has. But for a commitment to do just that to not However, if the debtor fraudulently or recklessly. Inadvertent seriously know that Settlement, it shall not complete.
Section 311 provisions of this section before you make any use of force. The case of the creditors listed in the instrument. This is the message noted. That the debt instrument to the holder.
Section 312 of the debt should be paid by him to order the debtor to set up a defense which is the same as any creditor against a transferee in good faith to find it. Not unless it appears in the instrument itself. Or some of the common According the nature of the instrument.
Section 313 provisions of this section before you make apply to all debts should be paid to the shareholders that the case may be.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1234/2552.
Letter of consent and acknowledged the transfer of claims between the defendants 1 to the plaintiff that the defendant 4 was to the defendant at one that read, "It is understood that AT & T (AT & T), but respond to. ask you to pay money directly in your name to other companies and to pay this. AT & T will not and must not accept an increased liability to you or to the Assignee addition to allowing the transfer of financial rights. Does not mean any reasons that AT & T taking of their rights contained in the contract, "such statements clearly show that the four defendants did not consent to the transfer of claims by not reluctant to say or do anything But a consent within the framework of the rights of the defendant, 4 which would be made in a contract between the defendant, one with the defendant, 4 Therefore, if the defendant 4 was a defense to the defendant at first, it shall be entitled to raise against the plaintiff, which are transferee from the defendant claims that a defendant who was transferred to 4 are eligible to apply total amount. U.S. 13,522,469.67 of set-off with pay. 11,610,539.33 Baht 4 defendant is required to pay for a defendant to a cause of the debt extinguished. The plaintiff, as assignee of the defendant claims that a transferor has no right to demand the payment of four defendants. 11,610,539.33 baht to her.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5574/2551.
Despite an agreement to buy land with buildings between S. and the defendant is a reciprocal agreement. Both parties have as a debtor and creditor and debtor. That is, the defendant as a creditor to transfer land and buildings from Sat, which is in the debtor to transfer land to a defendant. At the same time as the defendant is a debtor to pay debts land. Sat building to the creditors in order to receive payment for land with buildings from the defendant, but when the facts show that the S. part of their debt to the defendant is already before the S. Claims will be transferred to the plaintiff. The transfer of claims between the plaintiff Sat, thus transferring only the claims as a creditor only. Transfer in this manner, when it was made in writing and forwarded to the notice of the defendant would have completed the Commercial Code, Section 306, first paragraph, the defendant is liable for repayment plus interest to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2408/2551.
Transfer the defendant to a claim that a defendant has the debtor of a defendant to the plaintiff and the plaintiff agreed to pay royalties from the transfer of claims to the defendant to transfer a claim under P.po. Wed. . Section 303 and 306, so the plaintiff shall have the right to claim repayment from the debtors of the defendant took an in behalf of the plaintiff. But when the transfer of claims that the defendant first made to the plaintiff has an agreement in article 6 that "if customers refuse to pay debts or unable to pay its debts, in whole or in part, or the customer does not need to pay debt is not that prior to the trip. To the transferee. The transfer agreement allows compensation for damages caused by the transfer to the claims. Transfer is equal to the amount of money that customers do not pay the debt with debt. Interest rate of 15 percent per year from the date of default until such transferee will be required to pay debt. And the transferee will be entitled to the money deducted under clause 4 or remuneration that would have been transferred from the transfer of claims to the deductible payment. Immediately without notice to pop as the transfer of know ... "as the two defendants are also liable for payment of claims transferred to the plaintiff. The agreement followed by
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable for both the defendant's claims that a debtor has to bring a defendant to transfer to the plaintiff and the plaintiff did not receive payments under such claims from Debtor of a defendant that a defendant is liable under the contract. Thus sued the two defendants liable under the contract claim, which does not really work transfer. The old law specifically. Not the case, the plaintiff sued the enforcement of claims transferred from the defendant, a call to a debtor of the defendant, a settlement debts arising from contracts between the defendant, one with the debtor the age of 2 years to sue the plaintiff's so old. The 10-year Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 799/2551.
The plaintiff contracted to lease the land from the plaintiff the defendant. Later, the plaintiff has a letter stating that the transfer in writing, stating the claim. A contract in writing between the plaintiff and the Bank of A. that the "transfer" and "transferee", respectively, the contents of the book states that the transfer of a lessor of land. Buildings I transferred the right to receive rent from the defendant each month lease to the transferee. Is the recipient of such funds. The transferor hereby certify that Transferee as the transferor has the right to complete in all respects. And a notice of transfer in writing to the defendant and the defendant has accepted in writing. Transfer book claims the right to claim transfer of land rental contracts. Between the plaintiff and the defendant, which is the lease that the plaintiff brought a lawsuit filed this A. Bank determines that the plaintiff and conducted according to the transfer of claims under the Commercial Code, Section 303, paragraph one and Section 306 provisions. Claims of the plaintiff to receive money for rent is vested in the Bank of A. Since then find it is the plaintiff's attorney to the payee bank a. rent instead of the plaintiff is not the plaintiff has no power to force the defendant to sue for. Pay rent to the plaintiff.
District Court asked the parties on the facts of that case law on the issue enough diagnostic power of the plaintiff to sue now. Has to decide the preliminary issue in accordance with Section 24, Civil Code Procedure. Court of First Instance held that the decision on the issue of the case and the reasoning of the decision is clear to all. Although a final decision on the issue in the report of the case proceedings. It does not make errors of fact, judgments, and unlawful under Section 141 P.wi.po. in any way.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 764/2551.
That a defendant has been paid in advance from the opposition 15 percent of the wages received under the contract will go before Enforcement Officer Report attached to the objection. The funds are vested in the defendant, a defendant that a right will be used in the construction of the contract the defendant, one is required to return to the opposition only in case of failing to comply with the contract only defendant 1 is marked as a receivable. of objection and no claim to any dissenter Paid in advance that a defendant was not given to the opposition in the nature of the objection will be sent to the plaintiff for the Enforcement Officer attached to. The plaintiff has no right to request that the objection to the execution of the salary as a pre-judgment debtor.
Transfer agreement between the defendant claims that a bank indicated that It is well understood between the parties that the claims transferred under the contract to claim that this is not certain that it can be called out from Chiang Mai University, who has opposed the amount of how much Because depending on the conditions or practices specified in the contract is not considered a challenge to transfer this claim with other obligations, which will allow the user to transfer existing debt to the transferee to hold or in part. all In case the transferee does not receive funds from the challenge or are insufficient to pay all existing debt. The transfer is still bound to pay the debt to the transferee in full. Text in the agreement indicates that the claim is transferred to the same fees as well as K with Practice, the objector to pay to K. As a result, a defendant is a waiver claim on the bank of a defendant and the only objection. Find the plaintiff has the right to freeze the money was announced that a defendant be transferred to the Bank not to. The plaintiff has no right to request that the case for the opposing force. As a debtor under the Supreme Court under Article 312, paragraph two Civil Code Procedure.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6517/2550.
The plaintiff claims in the transfer of debt under the Supreme Court in a civil case against the defendant company to B. Such claims are not claims of the plaintiff no longer the Commercial Code, Section 303, when the prosecution asked. bankruptcy after the defendant transferred plaintiff claims, then plaintiff has no authority to sue Issues such as legal issues in relation with public order. Supreme Court decision has raised itself by Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5), 246, 247 of the Bankruptcy Court Act and the Bankruptcy Court's Section 28.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6507/2550.
The four defendants liable under the contract and loan guarantees to banks and financial companies transferred Sat plaintiff claims that banks and financial companies are on Sat and was told all four defendants to transfer claims to all four defendants. already The plaintiff shall be entitled to claim all four defendants to pay debts by loan agreements and contracts. Guaranteed by the plaintiff and Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, whether the four defendants will agree with it or not.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6334/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 303 and Section 306, paragraph one of the first paragraph states that the debt is not paid by the debtor in default is not transferable. And the transferee shall have an interest in the transferred debt. Although the transfer of claims between the plaintiff shall be payable after the defendant defaulted. Debt, and plaintiff has no interest in such debt. It is not about trade, and not contrary to public order. Once the transfer claim is made in writing and the plaintiff had notice of transfer To the defendant as a debtor under Section 306 of the first paragraph. Shall be valid and the defendant lean. The plaintiff as assignee, which shall be payable instead of the original creditor claims. The existing debt from the defendant. Has the power to force the plaintiff sued the defendant to pay such debts.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2894/2550.
Defendant sold a fertilizer by issuing orders for products to customers to cooperate with the customers to pick products such as fertilizer, draft a document that builds trust in the tradition. A commercial fertilizer that the defendant promised to deliver fertilizer to the fertilizer leader orders the product from the first defendant and the defendant, a customer who has an agreement to buy fertilizer by default from the beginning that Buyers can transfer orders goods to any person and the defendant, one to deliver fertilizer to the leading orders exhibitors in the delivery of draft products to the customers do not have to endorse and sign the draft product but delivered to only show that the buyer has received goods from the defendant to draft a draft product that can be transferred to other parties continue. Without the consent of the defendant, a transfer and need not endorse the transfer of product orders. Transfer the right to receive the fertilizer between the plaintiff and the defendant is to transfer a debt which should be paid to the holders of the Commercial Code, Section 312, Section 313 plaintiffs who possess such goods orders. Can lead to the withdrawal or fertilizer from a defendant, the defendant has a personal reason to raise the customer orders the goods from a defendant and the defendant to two to refuse delivery of fertilizer to the plaintiff can not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5829/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant hired two limited partnerships Sat construction of road and drainage system. Sat Partnership believes construction materials purchased. And advance to the loan from the plaintiff to be used in a total amount of 778,240 baht was transferred Sat Partnership claims to get money from construction period to a value of 800,000 Baht, the plaintiff shall Sat Partnership all right. to receive payments under the contract immediately. Two defendants to pay debts to the plaintiff, the creditor directly. Sat Partnership has no right not to hold the two defendants to pay the plaintiff. Two defendants could not reject liability claims in writing to the Partnership Sat two defendants to stop paying before, which did not cause the plaintiff may be received by the plaintiff is entitled to receive Considered the two defendants have disputed the rights of the plaintiff already The plaintiff has the power to sue
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4872/2550.
Transfer of the defendant claims to be paid by the petitioner under the compromise agreement in the case before the Court of First Instance to the T. The company said a notice of transfer of claims to know who sings it. Transfer claims this would complete the Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, and if the transfer of this claim has not been canceled by prefer. The defendant's right to receive payment from the petitioner, a debtor under the Supreme Court in the case before it would become the property of T. defendant has no right to receive the sentence of the petitioner in that case then. The plaintiff has no right to cancel such claims. Enforcement Officer of the order attached claims to the petitioner is not like it. Petitioner has the right to petition to cancel the order revoking it.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 815/2550.
AM Aval Bank as the recipient makes payment of promissory notes to the Privy Purse Office, the Bank shall have the right hours, which will take recourse to the debtor, a person in accordance with their insurance last year. CCC Section 940 paragraph three of Section 985 and includes a case where no law specifically prescription. Therefore the age of 10 years under section 193/30 on the transfer of creditor claims on the promissory note debt from Aval Bank hours shall be entitled to claim creditors a debtor to pay the debt within the statute of the above as well.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6346/2549.
Or his father entrusted to the defendant to the plaintiff to represent the state land lease request from the Treasury Department and U.S. 4,000,000 to provide funds for the accused to a handling fee and rental. Defendant represents the district where the defendant received money from the district is the money that the defendant admitted on the agent by which the defendant promised to return it because the business office representatives did not accomplish. Defendant has a duty to send the funds to the district, which is under the Commercial Code, Section 810, paragraph one of the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to a loan agreement together. Plaintiff to the defendant, stating that loans equal the amount the defendant is required to return to the district thus changed the new debt is payable from the plaintiff, A. and change agents to contract debts are debts under loan agreements. The new debt with creditors to change the Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph three that have come into force with the provisions of the Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one on the transfer of claims must be made in writing. But did not appear to have been transferred Tue existing debt to the defendant to the plaintiff by his writing. Is not a complete transfer of debt. Although the district will be assigned to the plaintiff's action is all about. The plaintiff is a representative district as a whole does not appear that the school district operates with a plaintiff will be considered as a representative plaintiff with the defendant. And the loan agreement did not appear to district involved with the witness or participate in any way When the defendants are not liable for the debt to the plaintiff would not have to convert the existing debt as debt under the loan agreements. Plaintiff has no authority to sue, the defendant liable for payment under the loan agreements.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5842/2549.
Under Section 271 Civil Code Procedure. plaintiff took the case to enforce the two defendants, within 10 years from the date of the sentence. Although petitioner was transferred to the plaintiff's claims by auction claims this comes from Official receivership. Petitioner has the right to exist as a plaintiff. Petitioner is forced to fall into the required execution within 10 years from the date on which the plaintiff may allow execution under the sentence.
Allow any person to become a party in a case under Section 57 Civil Code Procedure. discretion of the court to consider the needs and convenience of the hearing. When the petitioner is not entitled to enforce the case may take up to two defendants because of the time under the law. If there is no reason to allow the petitioner to the creditors the right to wear the sentence instead of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4247/2549.
Fax Sterling contract that the defendant company to a debt which the defendant has a right to claim a debt from a third party and not yet due for sale to the plaintiff. The agreements can be concluded that a defendant is not involved in billing and issue a receipt to the debtor in debt sold to the defendant, a plaintiff already If the debtor be paid to the defendant, a defendant must first be presented to the plaintiff. Shows that when a defendant to any debt sold to the plaintiff already One plaintiff who has the authority to do so to receive payment. And receive payment of a defendant has no right to claim or receive payment for that debt in the next The contract is a contract transferring the right to claim under the Commercial Code, Section 303 agreements that If necessary, the plaintiff is entitled to a defendant in a prosecution, it is a method and details for a plaintiff to receive payment in the debt purchase only. Find the agreement not to transfer claims did not.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2618/2549.
Bankruptcy is a case where the plaintiff sued the defendant that the debt situations. Issue is whether the defendant has no liability or situations. This case is a separate issue with the plaintiff sued the defendant asked to enforce payment to the plaintiff in debt contracts. So it's not the same as Article 173, paragraph two P.wi.po. not a lawsuit waiting.
Agreement contract land between the defendant, one with the defendant, 2 is the defendant, a transfer of rights and responsibilities in compliance with contracts with the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is not only to transfer claims to the plaintiff. 2 only if the defendant is not subject to transfer claims it can not take the Commercial Code, Section 306 in force. However, the plaintiff and the defendant has made a second later agreed that The plaintiff and the defendant 2 has contracts soil, a soil conversion with the defendant that a contract will trade from the plaintiff and the defendant, 2 the excavation of the plaintiff to complete and then accused the two to pay the earth to the plaintiff. complete Can be considered as a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, a creditor, a debtor who the two new Would have the effect of new debt with a debtor under Section 350, which changed the debts between the plaintiff and the defendant to an end shall be suspended in accordance with Section 349, then the plaintiff has no authority to sue a defendant liable under land contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5391/2548.
Asset Management plaintiff assigned payee bank a. Audio All Formats are the original bill and receive payment. Thus the plaintiff has assigned a representative payee for the same debt collection and debt settlement happens. The transfer of such claims can not be transferred to the notice of both the defendant. King's Asset Management Section 9, paragraph one, so even if the bank or the plaintiff will not be a. a written notice to the defendant to know both the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 of transfer of this claim is legitimate. law The plaintiff has the right to wear the right as a creditor under the Supreme Court in a civil settlement that will force the defendant to follow. King's Asset Management Section 7.
Court of First Instance ruled under a compromise settlement to the two defendants to the plaintiff on December 22, 2536 by payment of 1,951,461.86 U.S. with 16 per cent interest per annum paid to be completed within 6 months from the date of the compromise agreement. The rights of the plaintiff to enforce the case and the defendant will have to roll for 6 months from the date on which a compromise agreement before, so the rights of the plaintiff, to begin from the date of June 23, 2537 when the plaintiff's case the debt is the Judgement of such action. two defendants in the bankruptcy on May 31, 2547 right in the sentence of execution by the end of time does not allow enforcement under Section 271 P.wi.po. plaintiff has the right to bring the debt under the Supreme Court to sue the defendant. Second, it is a bankruptcy case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6053/2548.
The defendant hired to represent am a. damages from the defendant, a contract to borrow the equivalent hours that the new debt from the debt is hired to do the loans. Employment of a debt is extinguished by the new debt under Commercial Code, Section 349, paragraph one, when the defendant terminated the contract with the hours before the loan transfer am the plaintiff claims. Obligations under loan agreements, so am unable to stop transfer of the plaintiff's claims in the complaint confirmed that the suspension gone to the plaintiff. Plaintiff has no authority to loan agreements that force the defendant to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7086/2547.
Petitioner claims have been transferred under lease from the lease submitted nights of medium truck. Which has cost more than the purchase price of the remaining lots. When a lease is a lease payment of arrears. The singer refused to sing the intention that the truck's center. Which has cost more than they should have. The middle of the night and apply it as exercise in bad faith. Petitioner has no right to request the return of middle
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3316/2540.
The transfer of claims under the Civil and Commercial Code Book 2 features a category 4, it is transferred as is the original state to the transferee to be a creditor instead of did not change the rights in any way, and usually accounts have. However, creditors who originally fought raised claims against the assignee, as well as a defense, so age is the age of the debtor to raise against the assignee claims must use the same age, the debtor can raised against the original creditor who claims it is evident that in this case a wage contract of employment made between the defendant and LTD. Or, a trader calls out the work to be done, so the age of 2.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 9206/2538.
The term "a defense on the transferor, under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 308 means that a defense that on the date of the transfer of claims to the defendant or the debtor knows that a defense that the date of transfer. claims, but also consent to the transfer of claims considered the defendant or the debtor taking a defense then the defendant has not raised a defense that is on the transfer of these up against the transferee, but if a defense is born. later on transferred claims shall not prejudice the right of the defendant or the debtor to set up a defense that up against the assignee claims for so while transferring claims between the plaintiff and the Wor. case the plaintiff has not. terminate the action call for wage doing of which a period of 5 years the defendant has not yet set up a battle of age and those up against the plaintiff, the assignee the right to claim later the defendant gave consent to the transfer of claims. to sing without reluctant to say or do anything and bring the case to the plaintiff to sue after the case, then terminate the defendant has the right to set up a battle of the ages that are up against the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 933/2536.
The plaintiff claims to have been transferred from the loan agreement. F. In writing and notice of transfer in writing to the debtor and the defendant. The transfer of such claims are legitimate. In case of the defendant, a debtor will be raised as a defense to the plaintiff assignee shall be a defense to the transfer of the debtor. Yes, for a defense during the transfer to the transferee if the transfer is not so indebted to the transferee or not. It is between the transferor and the transferee is not among those transferred to the defendant, a debtor Finds a defendant has the right to remove a defense raised up against the assignee has no right to claim transfer of the f. The plaintiff is well
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3973/2532.
Muang Samut Prakan Which has the right to land state land disputes location of the building. Entered into an agreement for a defendant to a commercial building. In the land by a capital defendant and transferred to Ministry of Finance. By giving the defendant the right to a lease from the Ministry of Finance for 20 years and allow the defendant. A transfer of leasehold rights to the municipal building of mosques will lead to a defendant or other person that the defendant, a transfer of leasehold rights to the lease agreement with Ministry of Finance directly on the defendant to a building already The plaintiff entered into lease disputes including 3 stand by the defendant to a later accused the three has entered into lease booths, therefore, the defendant, one another, which both the plaintiff and the defendant to three different not registered leasehold rights to the official, but according to the agreement. Whether a defendant will be provided tenant is contracting directly with the municipality of mosques. Such cases is not a sublease, but with the transfer of the defendant claims that a municipality on the mosques and Ministry of Finance. To the plaintiff or defendant. 3 do not appear on both the plaintiff and the defendant held the third notice of transfer of leasehold rights to the Municipality of mosques in mind. If it is not subject to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 307 to decide whether the plaintiff or the defendant has the right to three disputed building better, and there is no law that would raise the fine to the case directly. To bring the Civil and Commercial Section 4 to use based on relative laws similar especially the Section 543 (3) the case even if the plaintiff is a Letter of Assignment of lease dispute with the defendant at a previous defendant, 3 whether but when. 3 show that the defendant was in possession of disputed building then. Better are eligible for the plaintiff, which is not registered the lease and not to take possession of disputed building.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 857/2532.
Defendant with a contract to the defendant building renovation and building contracts Article 14 requires that "Contractor shall pay wages to an employee of the person under wage rates and the timing of the Contractor and employee agree, or contract them. If the contractor does not pay wages to an employee contract ... let the employer take the money wage employers must pay to the contractor paid to employees of contractors have. And the amount paid shall be deemed to be paid to the contractor has been hired by the then ... "to transfer the defendant claims to be paid under the contract to the petitioner. Petitioner had notice of the defendant transferred to the joint. Defendant with a written response to the petitioner that "Then do not mind the co-defendant in the transfer of claims by the petitioner to inform. However, the petitioner will pay only for the defendant will receive from the defendant under contract with such purpose, shall be equal with the argument that the defendant reserves the right to show the defendant's co-existing under the contract. As well as under Article 14 in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 308 and the rights of the petitioner to get the funds may not exceed the rights that the defendant has under contract. Co-defendant would be raised as a defense contract that they have transferred to the defendant, who was fighting against the petitioner is the transferee. Payable when the defendant paid the plaintiff, who was employed. Co-defendant would exercise the contract, 14 deducted from the wages of co-defendants must be paid to the petitioner to be paid to the plaintiff that the defendant was an employee. Petitioner has no right to claim money that the defendant exercised with less of them.
The Supreme Court 5561 - 5567/2530.
The defendant is a creditor of the Bangkok street construction accounts transferred debts or claims payment to the construction of the singer who sings in writing and sent notices to inform the transfer of a book and Bangkok. Need with a ceremony for the transfer of claims under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 transfer all claims between the defendants and the petitioner shall complete Claims arising out of, but shall transfer to the petitioner and the defendant. And allows the debtor Yan Bangkok. Employees of the plaintiff and the defendant lean, a third party without the debtor that Bangkok will be allowed to transfer it or not. The plaintiff has the right to stop payment for claims in foreign currencies are not.
Text under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 that 'the notice of transfer to the debtor or the debtor will not agree with the transfer of the' laws require only any reasons only one did not want to combine these two things to be considered. complete and transferred to lean debtor third party. Provided that Debtor will not agree with the transfer that is the case that in conjunction with Section 308, which means that if the debtor consents withoutreluctant to say or do anything stained the debtor out of the right to set up a defense which they are creditors to apply to the transferee. But for the transfer of claims to be first complied with the conditions which are not vested with full consent of the debtor not
The Supreme Court 1947 - 1950/2524.
The transfer of claims of depositors to the bank to others in any way to transfer the debt should be paid to specific creditors. Must comply with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306 is said to be in writing signed by the transferor otherwise would not be complete. If you are in any way to transfer the debt should be paid as a deposit, he ordered it to perform. With the issuance of checks to the bank money and deliver such check to the transferee to withdraw money from a bank. The net transfer of money from a bank account or current account of the depositor. Not issued by a deposit check made payable to the bank money. Or a letter of transfer to a legitimate debt. Will not cause the claims of depositors in the deposit to hold debt lapse. Because demand deposit account statement indicating the current conditions of payment and withdrawal that. When a deposit is payable or withdrawal. Use a check for each bank account given to specific In order to write a paper or other printed form, except the bank will not agree with deductions from bank account to transfer money is no different what with the withdrawal.
