Section 423 Any person or edit the news spread that message as a violation of the fact that damage to reputation or dignity of another person or a better way to do damage to come to his growth or otherwise. He will have to use the compensation to him for any damage. Caused it, but even when they did not know that the text is not true, but if should know.
Send a Message whoever they did not know that this is not true. If yourself or the recipient is the News Letter by the love interest in it by then. Send a Message so that makes it liable for the claims not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3275/2545.
In a civil case relating to criminal cases. Criminal Court unless the plaintiff and the defendant committed the two parties in a case already In the civil trial. The court must hold the facts as they appear in the Judgement of the Criminal Cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 46 when listening to the facts in a criminal case. For details or text message to the defendant, a publisher that a libel plaintiff put. The plaintiff's bad reputation is disrespectful is hatred, which defamation facts are listening to the defendant to an action in violation of the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423, paragraph one of the defendants 2, when the case hear that the plaintiff no evidence to confirm that the defendant The two are put together with the plaintiff or a defendant in the offense. Itself as a newspaper owner and vendor disputes to the general public may not listen to the two co-defendants guilty on the first defendant, second defendant has not violated the plaintiff's share.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 121/2539.
Coordination of national militia (Unc.uo. Security Operations Command Center.) Permits a defendant to be a member. Unc. Guides and the government is currently open to the office of a defendant at the airport in Chiang Mai. Accused are two that time is not a violation of the plaintiff. Later the plaintiff that the defendant either to take the name. The plaintiff's damages. The plaintiff shall pay the cancellation of consent at any time. When the plaintiff has been canceled. Two defendants could not use the name and mark such longer follows that the plaintiff told the defendant to cancel the revocation of both the name of the plaintiff and the government then. However, the two defendants still a "member Unc." Is the name of a defendant and still take marks official redemption form vehicles Dabplaipืn flame surrounded by a triangle and the circle of center Unc.uo. ISOC. Such a plaintiff to the label attached to the office of the defendant, one of Chiang Mai International Airport without further authorization from the plaintiff. The right of impersonation. Residential units of a plaintiff to seek interest in their affairs. The news spread and edit text as a violation of the truth to deceive the public. And various government agencies to understand the wrong that the campus. The government is the plaintiff's participation in business operations in the tourism industry is one of the defendant damaged the plaintiff's reputation and prestige. The actions of the two defendants thus violated the plaintiffs under section 423 Commercial Code.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3805/2537.
Than the plaintiff is a person with fame and honor are recognized and accepted the general public. The plaintiff must be a virtue for a long time. Edit the news spread that the defendant put the plaintiff in a daily newspaper that his wife plaintiffs are seeking an attorney to request divorce from the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff has a close, look with another woman. Which violate the truth. Make known the plaintiff would have read the news and think that the plaintiff has behaved in a way not good. Immoral act and a good tradition. Family discord caused the plaintiff's cause of hatred and disrespect the plaintiff. Subordinates would know about this lack of respect for trust. Adversely affect the work and progress with the bad reputation and the prestige that used to exist. The plaintiff would be damaged. Defendants liable for violations data.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3367/2535.
Because the plaintiff was out of work because a defendant a letter of complaint to the bank to the punishment of the plaintiff, a bank employee. Because the plaintiff is a court prison. But the actions of the defendant, a bank note is to let only The Bank will consider sanctions and ordered the plaintiff or not is a matter of bank Although the defendant a letter to the bank is committed to the plaintiff has been damaged, but it is exercised as a private citizen to tell stories complaint was part of the defendant, 1 and 3, testimony to the court in a criminal case the plaintiff sued percent. . The Court said that the plaintiff was a prison. It acts as a witness duty. Which is performing its duties under the law, not the exercise of the defendant deliberately faking damage to the plaintiff as a unilateral edit news indeed Do not act in violation of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 104/2534.
Prosecution of the defendants jointly liable for the damages in the data breach under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 432 does not need lectures that the defendants will each be liable to the plaintiff each does, because the accused is jointly liable for full action already, so sue the plaintiff has not. recondite Although the plaintiff, the Department of Foreign Trade officials say the defendant to a plaintiff who asks for help to investigate one of the defendants, "I do not like merchants to accelerate the government. I know my duty well. I do not like 'is not offensive words. Believe that the dissatisfaction caused by the defendant that a plaintiff has to accelerate along with regular duties without delay. The plaintiff has no bias at work. The defendant to a complaint against the plaintiff's supervisor that the plaintiff does not start can only sit and read newspapers. Bias at work. And act as a barrier to prevent the stickiness of export It is a complaint that alleged violations of the truth. Violation of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4595/2543.
The plaintiff had sued the defendant is charged with criminal defamation under the Penal Code, Section 328, and offenses against the Act, BE 2485, Section 48 type court sentenced the defendant. Listen to the facts in a criminal case. Defendant put the plaintiff to a third party for defamation, which the plaintiff by advertising with the document. The plaintiff sued the defendant of this case. A civil claim for damages. It is a civil case relating to the Criminal Court would bind the criminal defendant under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 46 defendant may not dispute the fact that listening is very different. Actions of the defendant is in violation of the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2929/2543.
The plaintiff is the inception of banks and financial district, as well as a shareholder and executive chairman. And its shares are held 80.93 percent of the total shares. Held that the plaintiff is associated with such an advantage. Trust of the people's business district capital firms turn to plaintiff's reputation and prestige as important, so when someone says or edit text news spread that a violation of the fact that the impact on confidence in the business of the company. banks and financial district, then the plaintiff would have received damage to reputation or dignity of finds made by the plaintiff. A. Although banks and financial companies are listed as a separate entity from the plaintiff so that any plaintiff to sue as described by the press falsely accused of both. As a result, people who deposit money banks and financial companies are afraid that the district will have no money to withdraw because of lack of liquidity, so the crowd unusual withdrawals. In addition, the defendant ordered the company to stop operations of banks and financial district and the plaintiff from duty Actions of the defendant has the plaintiff The plaintiff argued the right was considered by P.wi.po. Section 55 then.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4976/2536.
Message when read in the newspapers understand that. The plaintiff is the edit news When the message is put the defendant to the plaintiff sued the defendants alleging defamation is not a lie. And even though the plaintiff sued several defendants to the court the defendant would understand that they have the right to do so because the newspaper is available throughout the country. The general public would have a chance. Read and see the text in the newspaper did so. The exercise of the defendant sued the plaintiff was not an exercise that would only make more damages to the plaintiff as well. Is not a violation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2347/2532.
The defendant believes in good faith that The dispute is public and when the plaintiff is a defendant in a Nor Sor 3 has ordered the plaintiff out of the public, and orders to be posted in the dispute and the other plaintiffs to demolish things. building away from the public. Is not a violation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1590/2528.
Remarks or edit news spread that message a violation of the truth, which made violation of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423 that the offender must know or should know that not true, the defendant third-down type text ads in the newspaper for journalists. who killed their receiving a fair If the news is not true. There were impersonating the plaintiff gave the bracelet to his wife, Minister for the career that case the plaintiff failed to hire the accused went to kill the journalist. But when there is reason to expect the defendant to 3 to 3, so the defendant may not know is not true. Accused 3. Therefore do not constitute a violation.
The defendant to three publications that similar messages. The plaintiff is guilty. The evil and detrimental to the Trat province and when the plaintiff was sent to prison in the prison. Therefore rain beat down like a cleansing violence to end the evil. The plaintiff did not become used to hire to kill the journalists of the newspaper. The right of the text edit the news spread violation of the truth. It is a loss or injury to the plaintiff's fame. Although the newspaper is publishing a message as it has been heard from others. When the message violates the truth. News of the egg or repeated violations, it is made. The message accused the three leading publishers looking to protect their right or interest on the canal with its fair or a fair comment by the public nature of which would not even do. The plaintiff is being accused of a user to hire to kill journalists, newspapers, and was sent to detention in prison accused the three had no right to take the criticism of the villagers came down publications that the plaintiff is guilty before the court. a sentence The defendant was published three text ads, which should know that is not true. Thus a violation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4008/2526.
News of the newspapers that defame the plaintiff. ..... Plaintiff deeds a person without morals. The plaintiff had implicated ...... hire a newspaper reporter killed a propensity to use power ...... Etc. ..... it Find the right comments in good faith, fair feedback with which the nature of the people would not do. When the message is not true. An offense against the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423 and the news spread that message or edit a violation of the fact that the law states that do not intentionally or negligently. Or eggs, even those that do not know that the news does not really know, but if they are liable. Even if this same information in the case of the criminal court sentenced the defendant to have ads in the newspaper and even sentence. The Court in the civil case also sentenced the defendant thereof in the newspaper as well. Is a solution to restore the reputation of the plaintiff's well under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 447 for the second time the defendant used as punishment for an offense, but when the defendant was not the same sentence in a newspaper ad and then. Small enough to be modified to restore the reputation of the plaintiff's good Do not need another ad. Defendant is the editor of the publisher. Although not the owner of the newspaper and not the author or accomplice in the violation of any message which. Defendant would be responsible in the text or any other person selected to be printed in newspapers all the ad because he is the manager to edit news spread.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8446/2538.
Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant liable for infringement by lifting the pretext that The defendant said or a violation of eggs in news message of the truth. The result has been damage to the plaintiff's reputation. The find was made or the growth of the plaintiff, the liability for infringement under section 423 of the Civil and Commercial Code so that when the defendant said the phone message to his wife, am the truth of the plaintiff that the defendant said to the PM who has the interest and the like, in that. Shall not be violated by section 423 defendants are not liable to the plaintiff claims that the District Court decision to the defendant liable under section 420 it is not like Because in addition to those listed in the indictment.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3925/2531.
Liability claims in the infringement on the damage to the reputation or dignity. But only the news spread, or fever. This message violates the truth under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423 only the plaintiff has no right to claim compensation in case of defamatory and honor. Because the sentence is imprisonment.
Pay his defense attorneys that plaintiffs who sue the drawer is not a direct result of the defendant arising from breach of contract and breach, although it is considered as damages far beyond reason. The plaintiff has no right to call for the defendant.
Send a Message whoever they did not know that this is not true. If yourself or the recipient is the News Letter by the love interest in it by then. Send a Message so that makes it liable for the claims not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3275/2545.
In a civil case relating to criminal cases. Criminal Court unless the plaintiff and the defendant committed the two parties in a case already In the civil trial. The court must hold the facts as they appear in the Judgement of the Criminal Cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 46 when listening to the facts in a criminal case. For details or text message to the defendant, a publisher that a libel plaintiff put. The plaintiff's bad reputation is disrespectful is hatred, which defamation facts are listening to the defendant to an action in violation of the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423, paragraph one of the defendants 2, when the case hear that the plaintiff no evidence to confirm that the defendant The two are put together with the plaintiff or a defendant in the offense. Itself as a newspaper owner and vendor disputes to the general public may not listen to the two co-defendants guilty on the first defendant, second defendant has not violated the plaintiff's share.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 121/2539.
Coordination of national militia (Unc.uo. Security Operations Command Center.) Permits a defendant to be a member. Unc. Guides and the government is currently open to the office of a defendant at the airport in Chiang Mai. Accused are two that time is not a violation of the plaintiff. Later the plaintiff that the defendant either to take the name. The plaintiff's damages. The plaintiff shall pay the cancellation of consent at any time. When the plaintiff has been canceled. Two defendants could not use the name and mark such longer follows that the plaintiff told the defendant to cancel the revocation of both the name of the plaintiff and the government then. However, the two defendants still a "member Unc." Is the name of a defendant and still take marks official redemption form vehicles Dabplaipืn flame surrounded by a triangle and the circle of center Unc.uo. ISOC. Such a plaintiff to the label attached to the office of the defendant, one of Chiang Mai International Airport without further authorization from the plaintiff. The right of impersonation. Residential units of a plaintiff to seek interest in their affairs. The news spread and edit text as a violation of the truth to deceive the public. And various government agencies to understand the wrong that the campus. The government is the plaintiff's participation in business operations in the tourism industry is one of the defendant damaged the plaintiff's reputation and prestige. The actions of the two defendants thus violated the plaintiffs under section 423 Commercial Code.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3805/2537.
Than the plaintiff is a person with fame and honor are recognized and accepted the general public. The plaintiff must be a virtue for a long time. Edit the news spread that the defendant put the plaintiff in a daily newspaper that his wife plaintiffs are seeking an attorney to request divorce from the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff has a close, look with another woman. Which violate the truth. Make known the plaintiff would have read the news and think that the plaintiff has behaved in a way not good. Immoral act and a good tradition. Family discord caused the plaintiff's cause of hatred and disrespect the plaintiff. Subordinates would know about this lack of respect for trust. Adversely affect the work and progress with the bad reputation and the prestige that used to exist. The plaintiff would be damaged. Defendants liable for violations data.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3367/2535.
Because the plaintiff was out of work because a defendant a letter of complaint to the bank to the punishment of the plaintiff, a bank employee. Because the plaintiff is a court prison. But the actions of the defendant, a bank note is to let only The Bank will consider sanctions and ordered the plaintiff or not is a matter of bank Although the defendant a letter to the bank is committed to the plaintiff has been damaged, but it is exercised as a private citizen to tell stories complaint was part of the defendant, 1 and 3, testimony to the court in a criminal case the plaintiff sued percent. . The Court said that the plaintiff was a prison. It acts as a witness duty. Which is performing its duties under the law, not the exercise of the defendant deliberately faking damage to the plaintiff as a unilateral edit news indeed Do not act in violation of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 104/2534.
Prosecution of the defendants jointly liable for the damages in the data breach under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 432 does not need lectures that the defendants will each be liable to the plaintiff each does, because the accused is jointly liable for full action already, so sue the plaintiff has not. recondite Although the plaintiff, the Department of Foreign Trade officials say the defendant to a plaintiff who asks for help to investigate one of the defendants, "I do not like merchants to accelerate the government. I know my duty well. I do not like 'is not offensive words. Believe that the dissatisfaction caused by the defendant that a plaintiff has to accelerate along with regular duties without delay. The plaintiff has no bias at work. The defendant to a complaint against the plaintiff's supervisor that the plaintiff does not start can only sit and read newspapers. Bias at work. And act as a barrier to prevent the stickiness of export It is a complaint that alleged violations of the truth. Violation of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4595/2543.
The plaintiff had sued the defendant is charged with criminal defamation under the Penal Code, Section 328, and offenses against the Act, BE 2485, Section 48 type court sentenced the defendant. Listen to the facts in a criminal case. Defendant put the plaintiff to a third party for defamation, which the plaintiff by advertising with the document. The plaintiff sued the defendant of this case. A civil claim for damages. It is a civil case relating to the Criminal Court would bind the criminal defendant under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 46 defendant may not dispute the fact that listening is very different. Actions of the defendant is in violation of the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2929/2543.
The plaintiff is the inception of banks and financial district, as well as a shareholder and executive chairman. And its shares are held 80.93 percent of the total shares. Held that the plaintiff is associated with such an advantage. Trust of the people's business district capital firms turn to plaintiff's reputation and prestige as important, so when someone says or edit text news spread that a violation of the fact that the impact on confidence in the business of the company. banks and financial district, then the plaintiff would have received damage to reputation or dignity of finds made by the plaintiff. A. Although banks and financial companies are listed as a separate entity from the plaintiff so that any plaintiff to sue as described by the press falsely accused of both. As a result, people who deposit money banks and financial companies are afraid that the district will have no money to withdraw because of lack of liquidity, so the crowd unusual withdrawals. In addition, the defendant ordered the company to stop operations of banks and financial district and the plaintiff from duty Actions of the defendant has the plaintiff The plaintiff argued the right was considered by P.wi.po. Section 55 then.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4976/2536.
Message when read in the newspapers understand that. The plaintiff is the edit news When the message is put the defendant to the plaintiff sued the defendants alleging defamation is not a lie. And even though the plaintiff sued several defendants to the court the defendant would understand that they have the right to do so because the newspaper is available throughout the country. The general public would have a chance. Read and see the text in the newspaper did so. The exercise of the defendant sued the plaintiff was not an exercise that would only make more damages to the plaintiff as well. Is not a violation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2347/2532.
The defendant believes in good faith that The dispute is public and when the plaintiff is a defendant in a Nor Sor 3 has ordered the plaintiff out of the public, and orders to be posted in the dispute and the other plaintiffs to demolish things. building away from the public. Is not a violation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1590/2528.
Remarks or edit news spread that message a violation of the truth, which made violation of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423 that the offender must know or should know that not true, the defendant third-down type text ads in the newspaper for journalists. who killed their receiving a fair If the news is not true. There were impersonating the plaintiff gave the bracelet to his wife, Minister for the career that case the plaintiff failed to hire the accused went to kill the journalist. But when there is reason to expect the defendant to 3 to 3, so the defendant may not know is not true. Accused 3. Therefore do not constitute a violation.
The defendant to three publications that similar messages. The plaintiff is guilty. The evil and detrimental to the Trat province and when the plaintiff was sent to prison in the prison. Therefore rain beat down like a cleansing violence to end the evil. The plaintiff did not become used to hire to kill the journalists of the newspaper. The right of the text edit the news spread violation of the truth. It is a loss or injury to the plaintiff's fame. Although the newspaper is publishing a message as it has been heard from others. When the message violates the truth. News of the egg or repeated violations, it is made. The message accused the three leading publishers looking to protect their right or interest on the canal with its fair or a fair comment by the public nature of which would not even do. The plaintiff is being accused of a user to hire to kill journalists, newspapers, and was sent to detention in prison accused the three had no right to take the criticism of the villagers came down publications that the plaintiff is guilty before the court. a sentence The defendant was published three text ads, which should know that is not true. Thus a violation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4008/2526.
News of the newspapers that defame the plaintiff. ..... Plaintiff deeds a person without morals. The plaintiff had implicated ...... hire a newspaper reporter killed a propensity to use power ...... Etc. ..... it Find the right comments in good faith, fair feedback with which the nature of the people would not do. When the message is not true. An offense against the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423 and the news spread that message or edit a violation of the fact that the law states that do not intentionally or negligently. Or eggs, even those that do not know that the news does not really know, but if they are liable. Even if this same information in the case of the criminal court sentenced the defendant to have ads in the newspaper and even sentence. The Court in the civil case also sentenced the defendant thereof in the newspaper as well. Is a solution to restore the reputation of the plaintiff's well under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 447 for the second time the defendant used as punishment for an offense, but when the defendant was not the same sentence in a newspaper ad and then. Small enough to be modified to restore the reputation of the plaintiff's good Do not need another ad. Defendant is the editor of the publisher. Although not the owner of the newspaper and not the author or accomplice in the violation of any message which. Defendant would be responsible in the text or any other person selected to be printed in newspapers all the ad because he is the manager to edit news spread.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8446/2538.
Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant liable for infringement by lifting the pretext that The defendant said or a violation of eggs in news message of the truth. The result has been damage to the plaintiff's reputation. The find was made or the growth of the plaintiff, the liability for infringement under section 423 of the Civil and Commercial Code so that when the defendant said the phone message to his wife, am the truth of the plaintiff that the defendant said to the PM who has the interest and the like, in that. Shall not be violated by section 423 defendants are not liable to the plaintiff claims that the District Court decision to the defendant liable under section 420 it is not like Because in addition to those listed in the indictment.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3925/2531.
Liability claims in the infringement on the damage to the reputation or dignity. But only the news spread, or fever. This message violates the truth under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 423 only the plaintiff has no right to claim compensation in case of defamatory and honor. Because the sentence is imprisonment.
Pay his defense attorneys that plaintiffs who sue the drawer is not a direct result of the defendant arising from breach of contract and breach, although it is considered as damages far beyond reason. The plaintiff has no right to call for the defendant.
