Section 241 who retain the property of others. And debt mishap Benefits relating to their property, which dominate the know that You that it To withhold the property until the debt has been paid. But that said. You shall come into force. When the debt is not due
Furthermore the provisions of the preceding paragraph, this You shall not apply. If the entry. Possession has been started since the one which is unlawful.
Section 242 of the right to withhold any If not suitable for the nature of the creditor. Burden of debt is good. Not suitable for the order to the debtor before or at the time the property is good. Or is contrary to peace. Public good, such as the right to withhold it, you shall be deemed to have not find it.
Section 243 if they end up situations where the debtor is unable to use debt. Creditors have the right to withhold property and that it has not even set up a. Sing if the debtor can not be a debt that has caused or is aware of the creditors. After the time of the property know that Although not suitable for the nature Creditors in the debt burden on existing or not suitable for the command to the debtor. Good to Payable of the right to withhold it may be.
Section 244 who withhold the right to exercise their rights to the property. Withhold all payments until the debt is completely optional.
Section 245 who will retain the right to withhold the property interest. To withhold and remove the allocation for payment of their debts to creditors before any others.
Such interest will be allocated to pay interest out of debt before. If there is to allocate the remaining capital
Section 246 of the right to withhold who need maintenance and asset To withhold it is appropriate. As should be expected from a person as such
Furthermore withhold the property which it If the debtor does not consent. You may find that the holder Sidhiiึdhnnyong use or rent out to make a guarantee or not. But he said this shall not apply to the. Living as necessary to maintain the property itself.
If ever of the right to withhold any violation of these provisions. You claim that the debtor will lose the right to suspend time.
Section 247, if the right holder. To withhold costs in accordance with that Necessary concerning the property which they withhold it solely what you are called to pay for any property.
Section 248 within the provisions of Section 193/27 withhold the exercise prescription of a debt is not interrupted.
Section 249 accounts are urged to suspend rights. Withhold a search. Ensure the reasonable time.
Section 250 of the lost property protection rights, it shall withhold. But stop with the end of this said, you shall not apply to the case of the property. Which was distributed to withhold the rent or pledged with the consent of the debtor.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5201/2549.
The defendant hired someone building a building. In this regard, a defendant ordered plaintiff's employment from the plaintiff and zinc roof building If it falls into force of the Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) at the end of that Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. So the old claims of the plaintiff is a period of 5 years from the time payment is due on the defaulted defendant to a lawsuit until the expiration of 5 years not to sue does not terminate the plaintiff.
The plaintiff handed over the roof to install a defendant after that when it rains the roof leaks and turn off when the wind hit. , Which defects, which should not be found, while on authorized. The plaintiff is a defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the first defendant had paid theof the right to withhold only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff has not completed repairs to a defendant to withhold it like it was wage.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3874/2549.
Provisions under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 653, paragraph one, if there is evidence of the loan in writing either signed by the borrower is important. To sue to enforce not the case. Means, including prohibiting the defense raised by When the loans 5,000,000 U.S. claims that the plaintiff and the defendant together Thi Loan from the defendant that there was no evidence of the loan in writing. Defendant may not claim the funds by borrowing against the plaintiff to rely on the title deed of the plaintiff. Rama and the plaintiff agreed to transfer the land to the defendant hit the debt. The defendant is required to pay additional money to the plaintiff with a number of Rama. Seen that the amount defendant must pay is significant to be agreed upon. But the defendant still no agreement in detail, that the defendant is required to pay additional money to the plaintiff with a number of Rama. That's a promise that has not had the same under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 366, paragraph one of the accused is not entitled to withhold the title deed of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4671/2549.
The secured creditor. The Bankruptcy Act, Section 6 shall be a creditor who has the right over property of the debtor in the mortgage or of the right to withhold. Or preferential creditors are forced to pledge the same way that the recipient of the right to withhold of the right to withhold means in accordance with Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 which states that "Any person who retain the property of others and the benefits to which its debt on the property of whom know that You that he will withhold the property until the debt has been paid ... "of the debtor and the suite onto a letter of assurance to the Court, Samut Prakan, which is an organization of state courts, which is responsible for the adjudication of the case. provisions of law no duty or purpose in the possession of the property to the creditors. Debtor's intent in a letter to insurance is to induce the process of enforcement of the sentence prescribed by law. Nothing in the insurance books that demonstrate that the debtor a letter of assurance to the Relations Law between creditors and debtors. Judgement of the Court, Samut Prakan debt by creditors to submit an application for debt repayment from a contract of employment by the debtor, creditors make a video produced by advertising to publish audio and video television, which creditors are entitled to pay. Return only Yes, you are looking for a suite on the debtor, creditors put a guarantee in any way. Creditor has no such units of the right to withhold. Therefore can not deny that a secured creditor by creditor. The Bankruptcy Act, Section 6.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8141/2548.
The plaintiff delivered the goods and do defect. Like the defendant to withhold the price and value are as follows wage debt has not yet been imposed because of circumstances where one defendant who was responsible for all receivables. Assumes that the defendant defaulted on payments from the due date is not agreed upon. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 205 plaintiff is not entitled to interest. But when the court requires the defendant to use this money. Therefore owe money to pay the defendant the sentence and must pay interest from the date the plaintiff is entitled to receive from the date the Court of First Instance ruled on.
The Supreme Court 9208 - 9209/2547.
Temporary release of the officers. Can provide only a temporary release up to 6 months as glistening Criminal Procedure Law Section 113 paragraph one, after the expiration of such period. Agreement on bail accused of termination. Defendant, the officer can not continue to detain suspects. There is no reason that the plaintiff would have to release the accused with the application for land title deeds to the defendant to take it again. Defendant disputed plot of land must be returned to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7125/2547.
Petitioner disputes the steel product into towing a barge and transported to drift in the care to wait for instructions from the plaintiff and the defendant to make the transport.the right to withhold steel dispute, so naturally there are until they are liable to pay for vehicles and equipment that occurred after the goods are in custody. You can use this right, lean against the plaintiff, the consignee lading issued by it for transporting the steel dispute this. Product of the steel dispute the customs officials have been frozen, and falls under the custody of customs officers before the delivery to the person entitled to receive Because it is a product that has not already done to complete the customs formalities. Held that the petitioner did not knowingly or intentionally not taking possession of it to take steel dispute under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1377 and Section 250 when the petitioner has the right to withhold products are Even later, in this case based Enforce Officer iron them in order to dispute settlement under the Supreme Court took the case to the plaintiff, who was payable under the Supreme Court did not make the petitioner the right to withhold to die as well. In addition, the petitioner has such the right to withhold. The petitioner has preferred this over with the steel products. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 259 and Section 267 for freight vehicles out of the carriage. Both equipment and cost, which is north of the existing preferred stock in the hands of the carrier. Petitioner is entitled to receive payment as preferential creditors in the carriage before the plaintiff's information, which is payable under the Supreme Court in debt at the request open letters of credit.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4793/2546.
The plaintiff accused the land sale agreement disputes. The agreement to divide and transfer the registration of the plaintiff when the defendant led to land disputes and the Certificate. It is an agreement to purchase under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456 paragraph two, the plaintiff paid the defendant to complete and the defendant presented a land dispute that plaintiff's what I bought or will not be transferred to the plaintiff because the parties would like to transfer the registration. But the plaintiff would have a land dispute Sidhiiึdhnnyong until the transfer is. the right to withhold plaintiff who the defendant shall be entitled to enforce registration of transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff under Section 193/27 and 241 even though the plaintiff may bring a lawsuit more than 10 years, it does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Although plaintiff has filed a request asking the defendant to end segregation of land south of the plaintiff's possession. Then transferred to the plaintiff as an area of approximately 25 rai, it is only when the official forecast only land Surveyors and mapping test area disputes under the command of the District Court by the plaintiff and the defendant is a leading Point Land Surveyors, which dispute the possession of the plaintiff. area of 27 rais court shall have the power to judge that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the land area of dispute settlement, which appears in the map. Not a judge than a request under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 142.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1894/2546.
Defendants who provide loans to debtors who sings hold title to land as loan security. Petitioner has the right to take the title deeds as security for repayment until the loan repayment will be based on the agreement itself. But the right to hold title deed is the only person entitled to enforce the same time the parties can not confirm the others. The the right to withholdunder the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 means that the occupier has occupied the property of others, and a debt which you are the possessor concerning the property owned the debt that the petitioner has only loans that the petitioner will receive repayment is only for you to ask those with land title deeds are not. When Enforcement Officer the enforcement of land to the petitioner is not the right to withhold Deed.
The fact that the plot of land will now be given to the petitioner to take a mortgage loan guaranteed by permitting the borrower with The petitioner claims that the debt which you have to ask people with title deeds. This allows the singer has the right to withhold law. To support that petitioner has the right to withhold. Petitioner referred to in the petition with Attest to the class complaint investigation finds no It is not only the facts, which details or facts that are part of the facts mentioned in the petition of the petitioner, despite the material to the case should be diagnosed, it must be raised is the fact that each other. and the like in the first instance.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6293/2545.
The plaintiff asked the defendant's property seized Enforcement Officer auction to appear on title deed of the land seized in the possession of the petitioner as transferee of the original claims from creditors of the defendant. Who sings me to put right a creditor mortgage on the land the petitioner as the mortgagee would like to receive payment from the property mortgage before ordinary creditor without room to pause and that ownership of the property will be transferred to third parties, and then, or can not find. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 702, paragraph two, because the mortgage would follow throughout the land until the petitioner will receive payment. But to Enforcement Officer ask the petitioner to deliver title deeds to auction is considered part of the execution under the Supreme Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 275276 in conjunction with Section 304 case on the right to withhold plot of land it is the petitioner who is. debtors, creditors and the defendant, who was only Petitioner to withhold title deeds to wait until the defendant to pay the debt, which affect the rights of the plaintiff, a creditor under the Supreme Court in another case one is forced to auction for seized land has not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3837/2545.
The plaintiff contracted to buy land dispute from the defendant. To pay for the part and then the rest will be paid on registration of transfer. The defendant delivered to plaintiff's land disputes. Which the defendant's property rights through the purchase and sale agreement, which the defendant as to sell the debt to be transferred to the registration of the disputed land to the plaintiff, who will buy Such debt is a benefit to the plaintiff about the plaintiff's possession of the property. The plaintiff therefore prefer to withhold the disputed land until the defendant is listed as transferred to the plaintiff. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 even if the defendant is claiming that the plaintiff claims the defendant forced to comply with an agreement to buy and to sell more than 10 years, and then terminate the matter. But under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/27 noted that even if the claim is to terminate the president. As a plaintiff who Sidhiiึdhnnyong still registered to the defendant shall have the right to transfer land to their dispute with the remainder paid to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 519/2545.
Buy plastic sheets with the defendant from the plaintiff to install the wastewater treatment crab plaintiff, the defendant handed over plastic crabs in the wastewater treatment to the defendant already After that, the defendant used the wastewater treatment for approximately 2 to 3 months, plastic sheets, mattresses floating on the aneurysm, which is not defective should be found while on delivery. The plaintiff then the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 the right to withhold the defendant has paid the plaintiff, but only to repair the defect such purpose. When the plaintiff asked the defendant to contact the repair several times. But the defendant refused by referring to the need for the waste water treatment. Can not pump water from the pond because it will lose revenue. Is a plea that is not in the nature of the plaintiff, a contractor can only do so alone. Therefore, the plaintiff can not repair the defects of the work is not the fault of the plaintiff. Defendant has no right. Withhold wage arrears again.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7705/2544.
Debt, which benefits the defendant on a drive that will create a right to dispute the defendant. Car dispute the need to withhold the debt arising from the inspection vehicle is liable to the plaintiff to the defendant only. Down payment of the plaintiff to the defendant for a debt that would cause the defendant has not disputed the right to withhold car, even if the plaintiff is a breach of contract. Defendant has forfeited the deposit as provided by law. Find the right to bring disputes to the vehicle in possession to force the plaintiff to pay the debt without the agreement have the right to do so.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5897/2544.
Although the two defendants to hire plaintiff to plate mold several times, but for the employment of each can be separated from one another, so debt paid under contract to plate mold was 1 to 3, it is not about hiring the 4th and not a benefit to the plaintiff concerning the mold plate by Contract No. 4 adheres to the plaintiff. The debt paid a mold plate 4 times, it is not due to the plaintiff because the defendant credit for 90 days, both the plaintiff has no right to. Withhold the mold plate under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 621/2544.
Tue to Sat installment land sale contract on February 8, 2510 by A. staying home in 2510 to grow the division of land will be transferred to S. A., but segregation is a problem because of the lawsuit between Sat. original owner In the case of S. 2514 and died in 2522 allowed the district to take possession of S. Home cultivation until the district has died already The plaintiff has possession of the heirs later. The plaintiff has the right to withhold land until the heir to the defendant to comply with the contract Sat to register transfer to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 and Section 193/27 for the plaintiff sued to force the defendant to register when the land transferred to the plaintiff. Year 2536 will not expire under Section 1754.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2682/2543.
Although the defendant contracted to sell and deliver possession of the land dispute and the plaintiff has possession of a land dispute all the time. The defendant received. Settlement from the plaintiff and the plaintiff since 2521 the right to withhold land disputes. Have the right to sue to force the defendant to submit an application for surveying division. Registration of transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff to sue the officer does not terminate the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/27.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1898/2543.
Debt loans up to fifty U.S. over who is not evidenced in writing signed by the borrower can not claim to execution. Lender has no right to take title to the land of the borrower has a debt security.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7326/2541.
The plaintiff agreed to divide the land dispute by the defendant both conciliation agreement. Although ownership is not registered. But by the time the defendants attest that the plaintiff gave possession to the defendant as letting them look like a division into contracts binding the plaintiff. When the defendant's possession of land as a division into the recipient. Court shall have the power to adjust legislation in the right to withhold under the Civil and Commercial Section 241 comes into your decision to the accused. Such provisions would hold that there is a debt to the defendant about the benefits deed dispute. Therefore, the defendant has the right to withhold title dispute until it has been divided property rights as a legitimate compromise agreement.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2747/2540.
Although the Insurance Article 3.7.5 states that this insurance does not cover damage caused by a lack of drive, which means that a defendant insurer shall not be liable for any damage caused to the plaintiff insured that we can not take advantage of the car. The insurance Accidental damage and car use is not to say this is the lack of interest from the start of accident damaged cars that insurance does not apply until the repairs are done using the usual Plaintiff to claim the lost section of a defendant because he did not exclude liability under Article 3.7.5 that any insurance policy. But the damage is the lack of benefit from using the plaintiff's car as filed. Is the lack of interest that occurred after the plaintiff's car repairs are done and the reason that the defendant refused to pay for a repair to complete the repair. Make the right repairs. Withhold the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff's lack of benefit from using the plaintiff's car. Is the opposite of the lack of benefits that a defendant shall not be liable under the policy, which are independent from each other due to different causes. The plaintiff therefore claims for lack of benefit from the use of this car.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5469/2539.
Asst.'ve Made an agreement to sell the land dispute that the plaintiff actually receiving payment for land disputes, and has delivered the land dispute to the plaintiff possession of the work of all the time, even promised to buy and sell is not made in writing, but when the repayment each other and then force each other under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two, when the plaintiff is a land dispute under the contract to buy and sell plaintiff the two have the right to withhold until you have transferred even pass. to death. more than 30 years of the plaintiff the right holder. I have the right to withhold and force the defendant, a descendant of the past four. To register the disputed land transferred to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 and Section 193/27 does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2758/2539.
Plaintiff's land contract mortgage debt as collateral to the defendant when the plaintiff that the plaintiff was using the money to the defendant required under the mortgage and debt under a mortgage, so the plaintiff to the defendant shall be suspended to the end of the mortgage contract that the plaintiff made to defendant would hold to the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744 (a) the defendant has a duty to redeem the mortgaged land, the applicant said. The plaintiff requested the defendant presented a letter to the land on behalf of the defendant in the sale and transfer to a partial settlement of November. If the plaintiff is willing to use debt Wed. Receivables represented plaintiff Wed. By allowing the defendant to the plaintiff's land sale proceeds to debt repayment would cause binding on the plaintiff the defendant has the right to take action until the plot of land liable for debts of November. Will depart
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7170/2538.
Plaintiff's debt obligation to be refunded to the defendant to redeem the mortgaged property from the bank instead of the plaintiff of the agreement that when the defendant redeemed the mortgage, then the plaintiff will have to sell the land to redeem the mortgage, such that the defendant seized documents for the land to provide for the accused. the agreement also separately for a debt, which benefits the defendant concerning the property that the defendant redemption comes under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 is not the defendant has no the right to withhold documents for the land of the plaintiff when the plaintiff proceeds onto the court full of the defendant. redeem the mortgaged property from the bank instead of the plaintiff and the defendant is to return the documents to the defendant to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant for delivery of documents for the land back that the defendant did not have to fight back is to remove the case for the suffering person can not be calculated as income, not disputes about ownership or possessory right in land
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6321/2538.
The defendant is a debt of 233,149 U.S. car repair on the plaintiff to the billing and collection agreements. Defendant does not agree to drop the bill and refused. Such payments. Defendant is a party in default. The plaintiff is entitled. Withhold the defendant's car to repair it until it is paid back.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 772/2538.
Checks payable to the defendant will be made to pay disputed wages to a filling of earth roads. The contract states that if a. Contractor land reclamation is not completed within the specified time the defendant employer can cancel the check will be made without any conditions were as follows: on Sat. Soil reclamation is not completed within the time prescribed in the contract the defendant shall be entitled to. Withhold payment and the check will be made according to the law including the right to cancel the payment of the check will be made to the Bank under which the exercise of lawfully and to send. Soil reclamation roads are not completed within the time prescribed in a contract. Defendant would not be forced to full payment under the contract even if the defendant is ordered to pay check, but the payment will be made under contract in the same debt can not be separated out, so check it out check the defendant's solvency is not. may be enforceable by law under Act offenses arising from the use of Cheque Act 2534, Section 4 between the number of people in debt and forced to exist under the law the defendant is not guilty.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 180/2538.
F. Not the plot of land ownership, land disputes, even the government has issued the title deed dispute f. F. Have not landed the title issue is not, there is no right to take title to the issue when f. delivery of deeds No dispute to the defendant and hold them as collateral loan plaintiff who is the owner of the real would have the power to track out plot, the documents for the land of the plaintiff recovered from the defendant can not claim that the right to withhold Deed No. dispute until you are. to receive payment because the debt is not debt as you are useful to the defendant about the title issue arising from the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 234/2537.
If the parties are in dispute about the ownership of the property disputes of the two defendants did not return the equipment to co-plaintiff. Because there is evidence to believe that the equipment is part of the Village and the Village was owned by a defendant with the two defendants will be refunded. When the plaintiff with the settings in the cable television business in the name of that joint. the right to withhold thus use one. Accused Both lack No offense intended to commit fraud misapplied
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2948/2536.
Amount of imported capital contributions deposited in the account as contributions are deducted from the salary of each employee that the plaintiff has already paid to employees. Just to the right plaintiff to deduct provident fund regulations apply. To benefit from the employee only. According to the plaintiff. When employees leave their jobs plaintiff is entitled to receive principal and interest on the capital account all contributions, without any conditions. The plaintiff has any just right. To withhold the payment of outstanding pay to employees only, even while they are still running, employees have no right to withdraw it. Power management and capital will become the absolute control of the three persons, the Managing Director position accountants and managers of individual plaintiffs. But must be administered according to regulations set forth. Useful in savings to employees. Controlled by the position of the 3 people that even as executives of the plaintiff. But an employee of the plaintiff and a member of the fund with A three-party administrator shall make on behalf of the plaintiff. But instead of making all members of the plaintiff company, as well as with Salary paid to each employee plaintiffs, including withholding funds donated to the fund in the account are expenditures for salaries of the plaintiff in which the deductible for income tax calculated in accordance with Revenue Code Section 65 by the plaintiff must deduct income tax from the salaries of all employees in accordance with section 50 and then delivered at the District Office under Section 52 is missing from the plaintiff to pay the money then. The funds are deducted from the salary account to deposit the money donated to this employee since then. Interest arising from this deposit is the income of employees. Find the money to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1496/2535.
The plaintiff and the district jointly open up a language center of the Town by the defendant agreed that The plaintiff is the cost of all operations and will benefit as compensation to the defendant in percent 30 of the wages received. The plaintiff purchased property from third parties to disputes in the business of the language centers in quarters with no debt with property disputes relating to any such water, electricity telephone. And benefits payable to the defendant that the plaintiff is a debt arising from the operation of the Language Centre. Yes, a debt for which the benefits to the defendant concerning the property dispute in which the defendant did not dominate. Defendant has no right. Withhold the disputed property.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2323/2534.
Car trading between the plaintiff and the defendant is dealing with final completion. In car ownership and car registration booklet would become the co-plaintiff. When the plaintiff's settlement with the defendant shall not drive completely right. Withhold car registration booklet. But are responsible for delivering to the plaintiff together. Handbook of the defendant to the car registration to register its name as C Co., the owner can be considered a document which takes away any of the other things that would cause damage to others. An offense under Penal Code Section 188.
Furthermore the provisions of the preceding paragraph, this You shall not apply. If the entry. Possession has been started since the one which is unlawful.
Section 242 of the right to withhold any If not suitable for the nature of the creditor. Burden of debt is good. Not suitable for the order to the debtor before or at the time the property is good. Or is contrary to peace. Public good, such as the right to withhold it, you shall be deemed to have not find it.
Section 243 if they end up situations where the debtor is unable to use debt. Creditors have the right to withhold property and that it has not even set up a. Sing if the debtor can not be a debt that has caused or is aware of the creditors. After the time of the property know that Although not suitable for the nature Creditors in the debt burden on existing or not suitable for the command to the debtor. Good to Payable of the right to withhold it may be.
Section 244 who withhold the right to exercise their rights to the property. Withhold all payments until the debt is completely optional.
Section 245 who will retain the right to withhold the property interest. To withhold and remove the allocation for payment of their debts to creditors before any others.
Such interest will be allocated to pay interest out of debt before. If there is to allocate the remaining capital
Section 246 of the right to withhold who need maintenance and asset To withhold it is appropriate. As should be expected from a person as such
Furthermore withhold the property which it If the debtor does not consent. You may find that the holder Sidhiiึdhnnyong use or rent out to make a guarantee or not. But he said this shall not apply to the. Living as necessary to maintain the property itself.
If ever of the right to withhold any violation of these provisions. You claim that the debtor will lose the right to suspend time.
Section 247, if the right holder. To withhold costs in accordance with that Necessary concerning the property which they withhold it solely what you are called to pay for any property.
Section 248 within the provisions of Section 193/27 withhold the exercise prescription of a debt is not interrupted.
Section 249 accounts are urged to suspend rights. Withhold a search. Ensure the reasonable time.
Section 250 of the lost property protection rights, it shall withhold. But stop with the end of this said, you shall not apply to the case of the property. Which was distributed to withhold the rent or pledged with the consent of the debtor.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5201/2549.
The defendant hired someone building a building. In this regard, a defendant ordered plaintiff's employment from the plaintiff and zinc roof building If it falls into force of the Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) at the end of that Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. So the old claims of the plaintiff is a period of 5 years from the time payment is due on the defaulted defendant to a lawsuit until the expiration of 5 years not to sue does not terminate the plaintiff.
The plaintiff handed over the roof to install a defendant after that when it rains the roof leaks and turn off when the wind hit. , Which defects, which should not be found, while on authorized. The plaintiff is a defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the first defendant had paid theof the right to withhold only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff has not completed repairs to a defendant to withhold it like it was wage.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3874/2549.
Provisions under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 653, paragraph one, if there is evidence of the loan in writing either signed by the borrower is important. To sue to enforce not the case. Means, including prohibiting the defense raised by When the loans 5,000,000 U.S. claims that the plaintiff and the defendant together Thi Loan from the defendant that there was no evidence of the loan in writing. Defendant may not claim the funds by borrowing against the plaintiff to rely on the title deed of the plaintiff. Rama and the plaintiff agreed to transfer the land to the defendant hit the debt. The defendant is required to pay additional money to the plaintiff with a number of Rama. Seen that the amount defendant must pay is significant to be agreed upon. But the defendant still no agreement in detail, that the defendant is required to pay additional money to the plaintiff with a number of Rama. That's a promise that has not had the same under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 366, paragraph one of the accused is not entitled to withhold the title deed of the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4671/2549.
The secured creditor. The Bankruptcy Act, Section 6 shall be a creditor who has the right over property of the debtor in the mortgage or of the right to withhold. Or preferential creditors are forced to pledge the same way that the recipient of the right to withhold of the right to withhold means in accordance with Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 which states that "Any person who retain the property of others and the benefits to which its debt on the property of whom know that You that he will withhold the property until the debt has been paid ... "of the debtor and the suite onto a letter of assurance to the Court, Samut Prakan, which is an organization of state courts, which is responsible for the adjudication of the case. provisions of law no duty or purpose in the possession of the property to the creditors. Debtor's intent in a letter to insurance is to induce the process of enforcement of the sentence prescribed by law. Nothing in the insurance books that demonstrate that the debtor a letter of assurance to the Relations Law between creditors and debtors. Judgement of the Court, Samut Prakan debt by creditors to submit an application for debt repayment from a contract of employment by the debtor, creditors make a video produced by advertising to publish audio and video television, which creditors are entitled to pay. Return only Yes, you are looking for a suite on the debtor, creditors put a guarantee in any way. Creditor has no such units of the right to withhold. Therefore can not deny that a secured creditor by creditor. The Bankruptcy Act, Section 6.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8141/2548.
The plaintiff delivered the goods and do defect. Like the defendant to withhold the price and value are as follows wage debt has not yet been imposed because of circumstances where one defendant who was responsible for all receivables. Assumes that the defendant defaulted on payments from the due date is not agreed upon. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 205 plaintiff is not entitled to interest. But when the court requires the defendant to use this money. Therefore owe money to pay the defendant the sentence and must pay interest from the date the plaintiff is entitled to receive from the date the Court of First Instance ruled on.
The Supreme Court 9208 - 9209/2547.
Temporary release of the officers. Can provide only a temporary release up to 6 months as glistening Criminal Procedure Law Section 113 paragraph one, after the expiration of such period. Agreement on bail accused of termination. Defendant, the officer can not continue to detain suspects. There is no reason that the plaintiff would have to release the accused with the application for land title deeds to the defendant to take it again. Defendant disputed plot of land must be returned to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7125/2547.
Petitioner disputes the steel product into towing a barge and transported to drift in the care to wait for instructions from the plaintiff and the defendant to make the transport.the right to withhold steel dispute, so naturally there are until they are liable to pay for vehicles and equipment that occurred after the goods are in custody. You can use this right, lean against the plaintiff, the consignee lading issued by it for transporting the steel dispute this. Product of the steel dispute the customs officials have been frozen, and falls under the custody of customs officers before the delivery to the person entitled to receive Because it is a product that has not already done to complete the customs formalities. Held that the petitioner did not knowingly or intentionally not taking possession of it to take steel dispute under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1377 and Section 250 when the petitioner has the right to withhold products are Even later, in this case based Enforce Officer iron them in order to dispute settlement under the Supreme Court took the case to the plaintiff, who was payable under the Supreme Court did not make the petitioner the right to withhold to die as well. In addition, the petitioner has such the right to withhold. The petitioner has preferred this over with the steel products. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 259 and Section 267 for freight vehicles out of the carriage. Both equipment and cost, which is north of the existing preferred stock in the hands of the carrier. Petitioner is entitled to receive payment as preferential creditors in the carriage before the plaintiff's information, which is payable under the Supreme Court in debt at the request open letters of credit.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4793/2546.
The plaintiff accused the land sale agreement disputes. The agreement to divide and transfer the registration of the plaintiff when the defendant led to land disputes and the Certificate. It is an agreement to purchase under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456 paragraph two, the plaintiff paid the defendant to complete and the defendant presented a land dispute that plaintiff's what I bought or will not be transferred to the plaintiff because the parties would like to transfer the registration. But the plaintiff would have a land dispute Sidhiiึdhnnyong until the transfer is. the right to withhold plaintiff who the defendant shall be entitled to enforce registration of transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff under Section 193/27 and 241 even though the plaintiff may bring a lawsuit more than 10 years, it does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Although plaintiff has filed a request asking the defendant to end segregation of land south of the plaintiff's possession. Then transferred to the plaintiff as an area of approximately 25 rai, it is only when the official forecast only land Surveyors and mapping test area disputes under the command of the District Court by the plaintiff and the defendant is a leading Point Land Surveyors, which dispute the possession of the plaintiff. area of 27 rais court shall have the power to judge that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the land area of dispute settlement, which appears in the map. Not a judge than a request under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 142.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1894/2546.
Defendants who provide loans to debtors who sings hold title to land as loan security. Petitioner has the right to take the title deeds as security for repayment until the loan repayment will be based on the agreement itself. But the right to hold title deed is the only person entitled to enforce the same time the parties can not confirm the others. The the right to withholdunder the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 means that the occupier has occupied the property of others, and a debt which you are the possessor concerning the property owned the debt that the petitioner has only loans that the petitioner will receive repayment is only for you to ask those with land title deeds are not. When Enforcement Officer the enforcement of land to the petitioner is not the right to withhold Deed.
The fact that the plot of land will now be given to the petitioner to take a mortgage loan guaranteed by permitting the borrower with The petitioner claims that the debt which you have to ask people with title deeds. This allows the singer has the right to withhold law. To support that petitioner has the right to withhold. Petitioner referred to in the petition with Attest to the class complaint investigation finds no It is not only the facts, which details or facts that are part of the facts mentioned in the petition of the petitioner, despite the material to the case should be diagnosed, it must be raised is the fact that each other. and the like in the first instance.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6293/2545.
The plaintiff asked the defendant's property seized Enforcement Officer auction to appear on title deed of the land seized in the possession of the petitioner as transferee of the original claims from creditors of the defendant. Who sings me to put right a creditor mortgage on the land the petitioner as the mortgagee would like to receive payment from the property mortgage before ordinary creditor without room to pause and that ownership of the property will be transferred to third parties, and then, or can not find. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 702, paragraph two, because the mortgage would follow throughout the land until the petitioner will receive payment. But to Enforcement Officer ask the petitioner to deliver title deeds to auction is considered part of the execution under the Supreme Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 275276 in conjunction with Section 304 case on the right to withhold plot of land it is the petitioner who is. debtors, creditors and the defendant, who was only Petitioner to withhold title deeds to wait until the defendant to pay the debt, which affect the rights of the plaintiff, a creditor under the Supreme Court in another case one is forced to auction for seized land has not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3837/2545.
The plaintiff contracted to buy land dispute from the defendant. To pay for the part and then the rest will be paid on registration of transfer. The defendant delivered to plaintiff's land disputes. Which the defendant's property rights through the purchase and sale agreement, which the defendant as to sell the debt to be transferred to the registration of the disputed land to the plaintiff, who will buy Such debt is a benefit to the plaintiff about the plaintiff's possession of the property. The plaintiff therefore prefer to withhold the disputed land until the defendant is listed as transferred to the plaintiff. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 even if the defendant is claiming that the plaintiff claims the defendant forced to comply with an agreement to buy and to sell more than 10 years, and then terminate the matter. But under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/27 noted that even if the claim is to terminate the president. As a plaintiff who Sidhiiึdhnnyong still registered to the defendant shall have the right to transfer land to their dispute with the remainder paid to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 519/2545.
Buy plastic sheets with the defendant from the plaintiff to install the wastewater treatment crab plaintiff, the defendant handed over plastic crabs in the wastewater treatment to the defendant already After that, the defendant used the wastewater treatment for approximately 2 to 3 months, plastic sheets, mattresses floating on the aneurysm, which is not defective should be found while on delivery. The plaintiff then the defendant is liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 the right to withhold the defendant has paid the plaintiff, but only to repair the defect such purpose. When the plaintiff asked the defendant to contact the repair several times. But the defendant refused by referring to the need for the waste water treatment. Can not pump water from the pond because it will lose revenue. Is a plea that is not in the nature of the plaintiff, a contractor can only do so alone. Therefore, the plaintiff can not repair the defects of the work is not the fault of the plaintiff. Defendant has no right. Withhold wage arrears again.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7705/2544.
Debt, which benefits the defendant on a drive that will create a right to dispute the defendant. Car dispute the need to withhold the debt arising from the inspection vehicle is liable to the plaintiff to the defendant only. Down payment of the plaintiff to the defendant for a debt that would cause the defendant has not disputed the right to withhold car, even if the plaintiff is a breach of contract. Defendant has forfeited the deposit as provided by law. Find the right to bring disputes to the vehicle in possession to force the plaintiff to pay the debt without the agreement have the right to do so.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5897/2544.
Although the two defendants to hire plaintiff to plate mold several times, but for the employment of each can be separated from one another, so debt paid under contract to plate mold was 1 to 3, it is not about hiring the 4th and not a benefit to the plaintiff concerning the mold plate by Contract No. 4 adheres to the plaintiff. The debt paid a mold plate 4 times, it is not due to the plaintiff because the defendant credit for 90 days, both the plaintiff has no right to. Withhold the mold plate under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 621/2544.
Tue to Sat installment land sale contract on February 8, 2510 by A. staying home in 2510 to grow the division of land will be transferred to S. A., but segregation is a problem because of the lawsuit between Sat. original owner In the case of S. 2514 and died in 2522 allowed the district to take possession of S. Home cultivation until the district has died already The plaintiff has possession of the heirs later. The plaintiff has the right to withhold land until the heir to the defendant to comply with the contract Sat to register transfer to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 and Section 193/27 for the plaintiff sued to force the defendant to register when the land transferred to the plaintiff. Year 2536 will not expire under Section 1754.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2682/2543.
Although the defendant contracted to sell and deliver possession of the land dispute and the plaintiff has possession of a land dispute all the time. The defendant received. Settlement from the plaintiff and the plaintiff since 2521 the right to withhold land disputes. Have the right to sue to force the defendant to submit an application for surveying division. Registration of transfer of disputed land to the plaintiff to sue the officer does not terminate the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/27.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1898/2543.
Debt loans up to fifty U.S. over who is not evidenced in writing signed by the borrower can not claim to execution. Lender has no right to take title to the land of the borrower has a debt security.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7326/2541.
The plaintiff agreed to divide the land dispute by the defendant both conciliation agreement. Although ownership is not registered. But by the time the defendants attest that the plaintiff gave possession to the defendant as letting them look like a division into contracts binding the plaintiff. When the defendant's possession of land as a division into the recipient. Court shall have the power to adjust legislation in the right to withhold under the Civil and Commercial Section 241 comes into your decision to the accused. Such provisions would hold that there is a debt to the defendant about the benefits deed dispute. Therefore, the defendant has the right to withhold title dispute until it has been divided property rights as a legitimate compromise agreement.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2747/2540.
Although the Insurance Article 3.7.5 states that this insurance does not cover damage caused by a lack of drive, which means that a defendant insurer shall not be liable for any damage caused to the plaintiff insured that we can not take advantage of the car. The insurance Accidental damage and car use is not to say this is the lack of interest from the start of accident damaged cars that insurance does not apply until the repairs are done using the usual Plaintiff to claim the lost section of a defendant because he did not exclude liability under Article 3.7.5 that any insurance policy. But the damage is the lack of benefit from using the plaintiff's car as filed. Is the lack of interest that occurred after the plaintiff's car repairs are done and the reason that the defendant refused to pay for a repair to complete the repair. Make the right repairs. Withhold the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff's lack of benefit from using the plaintiff's car. Is the opposite of the lack of benefits that a defendant shall not be liable under the policy, which are independent from each other due to different causes. The plaintiff therefore claims for lack of benefit from the use of this car.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5469/2539.
Asst.'ve Made an agreement to sell the land dispute that the plaintiff actually receiving payment for land disputes, and has delivered the land dispute to the plaintiff possession of the work of all the time, even promised to buy and sell is not made in writing, but when the repayment each other and then force each other under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two, when the plaintiff is a land dispute under the contract to buy and sell plaintiff the two have the right to withhold until you have transferred even pass. to death. more than 30 years of the plaintiff the right holder. I have the right to withhold and force the defendant, a descendant of the past four. To register the disputed land transferred to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 and Section 193/27 does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2758/2539.
Plaintiff's land contract mortgage debt as collateral to the defendant when the plaintiff that the plaintiff was using the money to the defendant required under the mortgage and debt under a mortgage, so the plaintiff to the defendant shall be suspended to the end of the mortgage contract that the plaintiff made to defendant would hold to the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 744 (a) the defendant has a duty to redeem the mortgaged land, the applicant said. The plaintiff requested the defendant presented a letter to the land on behalf of the defendant in the sale and transfer to a partial settlement of November. If the plaintiff is willing to use debt Wed. Receivables represented plaintiff Wed. By allowing the defendant to the plaintiff's land sale proceeds to debt repayment would cause binding on the plaintiff the defendant has the right to take action until the plot of land liable for debts of November. Will depart
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7170/2538.
Plaintiff's debt obligation to be refunded to the defendant to redeem the mortgaged property from the bank instead of the plaintiff of the agreement that when the defendant redeemed the mortgage, then the plaintiff will have to sell the land to redeem the mortgage, such that the defendant seized documents for the land to provide for the accused. the agreement also separately for a debt, which benefits the defendant concerning the property that the defendant redemption comes under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241 is not the defendant has no the right to withhold documents for the land of the plaintiff when the plaintiff proceeds onto the court full of the defendant. redeem the mortgaged property from the bank instead of the plaintiff and the defendant is to return the documents to the defendant to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant for delivery of documents for the land back that the defendant did not have to fight back is to remove the case for the suffering person can not be calculated as income, not disputes about ownership or possessory right in land
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6321/2538.
The defendant is a debt of 233,149 U.S. car repair on the plaintiff to the billing and collection agreements. Defendant does not agree to drop the bill and refused. Such payments. Defendant is a party in default. The plaintiff is entitled. Withhold the defendant's car to repair it until it is paid back.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 772/2538.
Checks payable to the defendant will be made to pay disputed wages to a filling of earth roads. The contract states that if a. Contractor land reclamation is not completed within the specified time the defendant employer can cancel the check will be made without any conditions were as follows: on Sat. Soil reclamation is not completed within the time prescribed in the contract the defendant shall be entitled to. Withhold payment and the check will be made according to the law including the right to cancel the payment of the check will be made to the Bank under which the exercise of lawfully and to send. Soil reclamation roads are not completed within the time prescribed in a contract. Defendant would not be forced to full payment under the contract even if the defendant is ordered to pay check, but the payment will be made under contract in the same debt can not be separated out, so check it out check the defendant's solvency is not. may be enforceable by law under Act offenses arising from the use of Cheque Act 2534, Section 4 between the number of people in debt and forced to exist under the law the defendant is not guilty.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 180/2538.
F. Not the plot of land ownership, land disputes, even the government has issued the title deed dispute f. F. Have not landed the title issue is not, there is no right to take title to the issue when f. delivery of deeds No dispute to the defendant and hold them as collateral loan plaintiff who is the owner of the real would have the power to track out plot, the documents for the land of the plaintiff recovered from the defendant can not claim that the right to withhold Deed No. dispute until you are. to receive payment because the debt is not debt as you are useful to the defendant about the title issue arising from the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 241, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 234/2537.
If the parties are in dispute about the ownership of the property disputes of the two defendants did not return the equipment to co-plaintiff. Because there is evidence to believe that the equipment is part of the Village and the Village was owned by a defendant with the two defendants will be refunded. When the plaintiff with the settings in the cable television business in the name of that joint. the right to withhold thus use one. Accused Both lack No offense intended to commit fraud misapplied
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2948/2536.
Amount of imported capital contributions deposited in the account as contributions are deducted from the salary of each employee that the plaintiff has already paid to employees. Just to the right plaintiff to deduct provident fund regulations apply. To benefit from the employee only. According to the plaintiff. When employees leave their jobs plaintiff is entitled to receive principal and interest on the capital account all contributions, without any conditions. The plaintiff has any just right. To withhold the payment of outstanding pay to employees only, even while they are still running, employees have no right to withdraw it. Power management and capital will become the absolute control of the three persons, the Managing Director position accountants and managers of individual plaintiffs. But must be administered according to regulations set forth. Useful in savings to employees. Controlled by the position of the 3 people that even as executives of the plaintiff. But an employee of the plaintiff and a member of the fund with A three-party administrator shall make on behalf of the plaintiff. But instead of making all members of the plaintiff company, as well as with Salary paid to each employee plaintiffs, including withholding funds donated to the fund in the account are expenditures for salaries of the plaintiff in which the deductible for income tax calculated in accordance with Revenue Code Section 65 by the plaintiff must deduct income tax from the salaries of all employees in accordance with section 50 and then delivered at the District Office under Section 52 is missing from the plaintiff to pay the money then. The funds are deducted from the salary account to deposit the money donated to this employee since then. Interest arising from this deposit is the income of employees. Find the money to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1496/2535.
The plaintiff and the district jointly open up a language center of the Town by the defendant agreed that The plaintiff is the cost of all operations and will benefit as compensation to the defendant in percent 30 of the wages received. The plaintiff purchased property from third parties to disputes in the business of the language centers in quarters with no debt with property disputes relating to any such water, electricity telephone. And benefits payable to the defendant that the plaintiff is a debt arising from the operation of the Language Centre. Yes, a debt for which the benefits to the defendant concerning the property dispute in which the defendant did not dominate. Defendant has no right. Withhold the disputed property.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2323/2534.
Car trading between the plaintiff and the defendant is dealing with final completion. In car ownership and car registration booklet would become the co-plaintiff. When the plaintiff's settlement with the defendant shall not drive completely right. Withhold car registration booklet. But are responsible for delivering to the plaintiff together. Handbook of the defendant to the car registration to register its name as C Co., the owner can be considered a document which takes away any of the other things that would cause damage to others. An offense under Penal Code Section 188.
