Section 353 if the rights and obligations of any debt falls to the same person you that debt be extinguished by the lapse Except when the debt. Fall to the provisions of the rights of third parties. Or when the ticket endorsement. Money back in accordance with Article 917, paragraph 3.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2659/2546.
Suspend debt by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code if the debtor has forgiven the debt set-off. The new debt. Or the Debt normally mingle. Who died a loan agreement with the defendant, who died a second time by payment to the plaintiff is not required. And does not appear to cause something else to make loans in the suspension. Debt that the deceased would be liable to the plaintiff is not compulsory. Mortgage debt, the device still does not hold to the end.
Transfer of business from the plaintiff as the plaintiff's Village Bank. The plaintiff must transfer all rights and obligations of the bank when the bank m m creditor knew the death of the deceased from the date of March 8, 2539 shall be considered by the plaintiff was aware of it. Since the day when the filing date of March 28, 2543 the plaintiff sued over the first year and then terminate the cause of debt is guaranteed by the equipment that a defendant made to plaintiff with liberation. But because the loan agreements in this case is implementation of mortgage insurance on the property. Although liability under the loan agreement which will terminate the Chairman of the debt. The plaintiff, a creditor with a transfer of rights from the original creditor rights would force out of property mortgaged under the Civil and Commercial Law Section 1754, paragraph three of Section 193/27 and still in force, but only for the mortgage assets only. May be forced to find other assets of persons who died with no Despite agreement over land as collateral, a message will indicate the creditors have the right to seize other assets of the debtor pay the debt in case of insufficient assets to pay any mortgage.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5758/2539.
Lease between the plaintiff and the defendant indicated that if the tenant wishes to purchase the land. This morning during a period of time at which the lease is also effective for the lessor. Agrees to sell the land to the lessee at fair value, which is negotiating an agreement. But the conversion price of land by deed must not exceed twenty-five million baht and Contract to exercise rights over land between the plaintiff and the defendant states that if a user wishes to. Land purchase contract in a period of time at which this agreement to take effect. Lessor shall consent to sell the land at fair value which users will have. Negotiation, but land prices are required to lease the land the message. It looks a unilateral act that the defendant showed intent to commit yourself. For sale at the same dispute to the plaintiff and the defendant's intent is certainly not characteristic. Conditions or alternatives for the defendant to comply with the intent Bidpoeigy not shown. As a result, a commitment binding the defendant will have to sell the dispute to the plaintiff at a price no higher than the 25 million baht plaintiffs expressed their intention to purchase the dispute to the defendant, thus causing a contract binding the defendant will have to sell the disputed that. plaintiff under the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two, broken promises, the plaintiff when the defendant has the right to apply. Force the defendant to transfer the dispute to the plaintiff was. Although the plaintiff that the contract between the plaintiff sued describe the defendant as the purchase and sale agreement, but plaintiff may attach the agreement to end action, which is part of the complaint and the class points. Two places the issue in dispute that the court requires the defendant to be bound by the lease contract. To exercise rights over land in the land to be sold not only to the plaintiff or any The lower court ruled that both defendants were bound to be sold to the dispute. Plaintiff under the agreement because the defendant is committed to sell at Disputed by the plaintiff is not used as a judge other than the complaint. When the lease and contract rights for use above ground between the plaintiff and the defendant is committed. The purchase of property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456 paragraph two and The plaintiff has the intention to purchase the dispute to the defendant as a result, the contract binding the defendant. That the dispute will be transferred to the plaintiff, and when the property in dispute to be transferred. The plaintiff and the plaintiff would be transferred to the rights and obligations, including the right to. Collect the rent with someone looking for might be both creditors and debtors of their own is not the case. This law shall be deemed to be extinguished by debt normally mingle with Section 353 by the plaintiff and the defendant does not have an agreement or intent when the commitment to purchase. The sales contract and is entitled to collect rent from the defendant's dispute is not suspended. There is a problem that must decide whether the promise of trading against the Commercial Code, Section 569 and void. Commitment to sell the land dispute the same purchase price 25,000,000 baht with no text. Indicates that the registration of transfer disputes that the plaintiff will have to stick with the mortgage or not. Therefore, the plaintiff accused attest that the plaintiff has an agreement to transfer the dispute is not installed by the mortgage, thus attest that there is agreement on the transfer of the dispute is separate from the commitment. Sell another phone that is not party to bring additional witnesses or modified. Commitment to purchase the dispute.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2659/2546.
Suspend debt by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code if the debtor has forgiven the debt set-off. The new debt. Or the Debt normally mingle. Who died a loan agreement with the defendant, who died a second time by payment to the plaintiff is not required. And does not appear to cause something else to make loans in the suspension. Debt that the deceased would be liable to the plaintiff is not compulsory. Mortgage debt, the device still does not hold to the end.
Transfer of business from the plaintiff as the plaintiff's Village Bank. The plaintiff must transfer all rights and obligations of the bank when the bank m m creditor knew the death of the deceased from the date of March 8, 2539 shall be considered by the plaintiff was aware of it. Since the day when the filing date of March 28, 2543 the plaintiff sued over the first year and then terminate the cause of debt is guaranteed by the equipment that a defendant made to plaintiff with liberation. But because the loan agreements in this case is implementation of mortgage insurance on the property. Although liability under the loan agreement which will terminate the Chairman of the debt. The plaintiff, a creditor with a transfer of rights from the original creditor rights would force out of property mortgaged under the Civil and Commercial Law Section 1754, paragraph three of Section 193/27 and still in force, but only for the mortgage assets only. May be forced to find other assets of persons who died with no Despite agreement over land as collateral, a message will indicate the creditors have the right to seize other assets of the debtor pay the debt in case of insufficient assets to pay any mortgage.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5758/2539.
Lease between the plaintiff and the defendant indicated that if the tenant wishes to purchase the land. This morning during a period of time at which the lease is also effective for the lessor. Agrees to sell the land to the lessee at fair value, which is negotiating an agreement. But the conversion price of land by deed must not exceed twenty-five million baht and Contract to exercise rights over land between the plaintiff and the defendant states that if a user wishes to. Land purchase contract in a period of time at which this agreement to take effect. Lessor shall consent to sell the land at fair value which users will have. Negotiation, but land prices are required to lease the land the message. It looks a unilateral act that the defendant showed intent to commit yourself. For sale at the same dispute to the plaintiff and the defendant's intent is certainly not characteristic. Conditions or alternatives for the defendant to comply with the intent Bidpoeigy not shown. As a result, a commitment binding the defendant will have to sell the dispute to the plaintiff at a price no higher than the 25 million baht plaintiffs expressed their intention to purchase the dispute to the defendant, thus causing a contract binding the defendant will have to sell the disputed that. plaintiff under the Commercial Code, Section 456, paragraph two, broken promises, the plaintiff when the defendant has the right to apply. Force the defendant to transfer the dispute to the plaintiff was. Although the plaintiff that the contract between the plaintiff sued describe the defendant as the purchase and sale agreement, but plaintiff may attach the agreement to end action, which is part of the complaint and the class points. Two places the issue in dispute that the court requires the defendant to be bound by the lease contract. To exercise rights over land in the land to be sold not only to the plaintiff or any The lower court ruled that both defendants were bound to be sold to the dispute. Plaintiff under the agreement because the defendant is committed to sell at Disputed by the plaintiff is not used as a judge other than the complaint. When the lease and contract rights for use above ground between the plaintiff and the defendant is committed. The purchase of property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 456 paragraph two and The plaintiff has the intention to purchase the dispute to the defendant as a result, the contract binding the defendant. That the dispute will be transferred to the plaintiff, and when the property in dispute to be transferred. The plaintiff and the plaintiff would be transferred to the rights and obligations, including the right to. Collect the rent with someone looking for might be both creditors and debtors of their own is not the case. This law shall be deemed to be extinguished by debt normally mingle with Section 353 by the plaintiff and the defendant does not have an agreement or intent when the commitment to purchase. The sales contract and is entitled to collect rent from the defendant's dispute is not suspended. There is a problem that must decide whether the promise of trading against the Commercial Code, Section 569 and void. Commitment to sell the land dispute the same purchase price 25,000,000 baht with no text. Indicates that the registration of transfer disputes that the plaintiff will have to stick with the mortgage or not. Therefore, the plaintiff accused attest that the plaintiff has an agreement to transfer the dispute is not installed by the mortgage, thus attest that there is agreement on the transfer of the dispute is separate from the commitment. Sell another phone that is not party to bring additional witnesses or modified. Commitment to purchase the dispute.
