Section 438 compensation to any place shall be used only by the court which is appropriate to the circumstances and the seriousness of the violation.
Furthermore, include compensation for the victim to return the property lost because of abuse or the price of such property, including damages, which should be used to enforce any damage. Which was created by itself.
Section 439 a person must return the property to pay other people because of their abuse is also responsible for all of the property is destroyed by accident or become impossible to restore property by reason otherwise. Accident or property is detrimental to the accident itself. Except when the property is destroyed or becomes impossible or detrimental to the night, although there do not abuse it would be rejected like that in itself.
Section 440 requires that if a person has taken his wealth to good use if the price of the property less good because the damage. The injured party is called the interest amount will have to make up time from which the location of the base price is about time.
Article 441 If a person must use to claims. Any damage. It took the better of his movable property. Or because the damage to his good. With the compensation to individuals who dominate it at the time the property taken or when the damage is already because of the disengagement shall be used for such Even outsiders are expected to own property or other rights over such property. Unless the rights of third parties such as the person who knows or does not know because of their gross negligence.
Section 442 if damage occurs because the fault of any one of the injured include know that You, the provisions of Section 223 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Section 443 of the case led him to death, including claims. Value cremate including the cost of other necessary too.
If you did not die immediately. Compensation includes medical expenses and damages to the lost do not come because of work itself.
If that is the cause of death to any person to lack of free legal support also know that That person that you would like to receive compensation for it.
Section 444 in case of damage to body or health that the injured prefer to pay costs which they must pay, and compensation for the lost capacity of work completely or partly in the current time, and at. future time.
If in the courts is impossible to be sure intuition that the damage he has indeed how The court said in that sentence to Reserves the right to modify the sentence again within a period not exceeding two years.
Section 445 of the case led him to death or injury to body or health better if he lost the freedom better. If the injured. Are bound by the law would require you to work as individuals. Outside the household or outside the industry know that You need to remember that the person who claims would have required compensation to a third party to which he is to be a lack of workers with
Section 446 If the damage to his body or health. If he loses the freedom The injured to demand compensation for the damage out something else which is not the money with more time. Claims which are not transferable and do not fall prosperity to the heir unless the right conditions, it has been earmarked by the contract or has begun to bring a lawsuit under the right then.
Furthermore, because women have damaged any criminal wrong doing is to their moral Durn it would have similar claims.
Section 447 allows any person to damage his reputation to be damaged when they requested the court may order the person to make appropriate management. The good reputation of the back instead of using damages or compensation by time and use.
Section 448 claims for damages caused, but the data breach. You that expire after one year from the date of the injured student to. Should be aware of the violation and require compensation or after ten years. But the date of the violation.
But if the claims data in which the offense. Punishable under criminal law of the old and the criminal is longer than the above know that You took the life of the longer comes into force.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 10878/2551.
The plaintiff's complaint alleged that the defendants 1 to 4, which conspired to www.ccbenchmarking.com Directors in a meeting of directors and has agreed to sell land to the eight defendants. The directors and shareholders of the Company and third parties at a price lower than the price. Assessment and the market price of the company is damaged. Violations perpetrated by the company. In a manner which claims that the director causing damage to the company. When it appears that the company refused to sue a defendant to the 4 that its board of directors. The plaintiff, a shareholder of the Company shall have the power to remove the case B. This was to admonish the defendant claims 1 to 4, the director of the Commercial Code Section 1169 as the first paragraph and the plaintiff shall have the authority to request enforcement. Accused 1 and 2, the Land Board to transfer the 25 to convert back to corporations. If it can not be transferred back to the land instead. Because the property is returned or the person is classified as a claim for violation of the Commercial Code as provided in paragraph 438, but the plaintiff has no power to force the defendant to sue for 5 to 8, which is not the liability of Directors to transfer land. 19 converted back to the company or pay compensation to the company. It is not in accordance with the rules and Commercial Code, Section 1169, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8888/2551.
The three defendants from the Director of the School since November 6, 2535 the defendant has no duty to control third commander in charge of various operations. The school since that date. Shall not be liable for the defendant to a misappropriation of funds from the November 6, 2535 onwards, but the Department of General Education, the plaintiff does not attest to that funds the defendant a misappropriation until the defendant to three retired Director of the school. number. Shall not be assigned to the three defendants jointly liable for the entire amount.
General Education Department, the Department of plaintiff is in the government's Department of General Education, a Department of General Administration of Education is authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff and attorney. With the prosecution. According to State Administration. The provisions of the law can not be used for general corporate seal to be of Plaintiff to sign the power of attorney to prosecute to the plaintiff.
On the General Education Department complaint against the plaintiff police officer even considered that The plaintiff knew of the infringement and then. I have not considered the plaintiff aware of it should require compensation on such date by when the Investigation Committee investigation is completed and the report of the investigation to the Director of General Education Department that accused the three who should be the compensation by then considered the plaintiff to know. and knowing violation. ID should be required from such claims. Appears that the Acting Deputy Director General of the Department of General Education, received the report of investigation. Committee's inquiry on July 14, 2537 plaintiffs filed suit on July 13, 2538 and does not expire.
The third defendant fails to comply with the Regulations of the Ministry of Finance and keep the money and bringing money to send. Warehouse District, and the duties of District 2520 Article 20 and Article 37 by the three defendants not to appoint auditors to get paid daily to check the receipts and payments on a daily basis is why can not verify. found the defendant guilty of negligence, thus one of the three defendants are not related to the provisions of the Tort Liability Act 2539 authorities enforce these provisions, because after the events of this case. To the provisions of that law to apply to this case can not
The second defendant was appointed by the three defendants to be responsible for overseeing the review and check for payment to be chairman storage. Money for the defendant on count 2, is not a review of the pay day according to Ministry of Finance. To keep the money and bringing money to send the library functions of the District 2520 District and Article 20 and Article 37 of the third defendant is liable for the consequences of the negligence of such person.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7518/2551.
Plaintiff's complaint claims that All three defendants are officers of the plaintiff under. The impaired performance. Be careful not to store supplies. Does not ensure that the supplies were stored exactly as it appears in inventory control accounts or not. The result was that inventory kept in the storage room inventory loss. Claims that the three defendants took the property in the manner and taking possession. Property is non-refundable. Claims based primarily on the charges of the plaintiff's complaint is a matter of using Claims for damages caused, but the data violated the one-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one, not the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 plaintiff filed this lawsuit after the expiration of one year. from the date of knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. Plaintiff's claims, so terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5588/2551.
In addition, the plaintiff's complaint that the defendant, will present the two together intentionally compromised. Clearing and digging ponds and fish in the land of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also sued another lecture that Alternatively, the two defendants with negligence action. Check that the defendant did not land either as a land invasion of the defendant or both. This action by negligence is a criminal offense when they are prescribed. It expressly provides that such negligence is a fault. But action by the negligence of two defendants sued by the plaintiff in the lecture. This case is not in any form. Por the Forest Act or other laws of land or any criminal penalty. The plaintiff filed this complaint it is alleged that the defendants violated both the. The plaintiff only Not confirm that the two defendants guilty criminal is not in the age of criminal. Longer than the force. But requires a prescription, violation of the Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the plaintiff have to claims for damages within one year from the date the plaintiff knew of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims.
The two defendants to take possession and then Unnsrngrong clearing of mangrove forest to serve without the right to ever come like this. Can be considered as a continuing violation since the plaintiffs ever to detect. It will feature such acts continue to attest that the plaintiff has proven that. So long as the two defendants did not give away. Violations still exist, which is why the plaintiff may enforce any claims. Until the two defendants to stop making violations. In the past one year to sue the two defendants do not stop the abuse. The plaintiff has the right to claim back a year from the date of the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit until August 31, 2542 the damages from a violation of both the defendant back a year from the date filed. Does not terminate the. For damages in excess of one year only and expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5391/2551.
In the case of civil court judge must hold the facts as they appear in the Judgement of the Criminal Cases under Section 46 Criminal Code Procedure appeared to stop listening to the facts in the criminal case, but only that both the plaintiff and other defendants. Negligence. However, any negligence over the same does not appear so in the civil case, both the plaintiff and the defendant shall be attest to see who recklessly over each other and should be subject to damages from the other party, just do it Court case of pricey to be. in accordance with the provisions of the law also requires. Person's civil liability. Regardless of whether the defendant is sentenced or not the offense that P.wi.o. Section 47 paragraph one and the provisions of the law on the liability of individuals in civil cases in different Parties negligence caused the debt in violation of this Section 442 Commercial Code, the provisions of Section 223 shall apply mutatis mutandis Article 223, paragraph one, which is important is that the damage has occurred because of which side is. generate less. What is more just and Article 438, paragraph one states that the court decision on compensation appropriate to the circumstances and the bad. Therefore, the abuse of power that can claim damages from the defendants that the plaintiff was required to prove that Than the plaintiff and the defendants recklessly damaged by the negligence of any more, just how is the Court of First Instance in civil cases the plaintiff has the power to decide whether the defendant who is a party. Negligence, anytime. Not contrary to the Criminal Court in the case. The District Court ruled that. Negligence, rather than the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4751/2551.
The plaintiff filed a descriptive meaning that The plaintiff is the lawful wife of S., who died with three children who died who are responsible for the plaintiff and child care support all three of the plaintiff. The defendant made a violation a cause of death is dead, the three sons of the plaintiff and the plaintiff. Have no lack of support. Therefore like to call the lack of child support without the plaintiff and the plaintiff such a meaningful enough to understand that. Three sons like to call the plaintiff's claim as a sure enough of their rights. But because of the three sons of a minor plaintiff has not filed or the case itself. The plaintiff then sued the mother and Representatives for election instead. Would hold that the plaintiff sued on behalf of children with all three by default. The plaintiff has the power to take legal action without the lack of support of minor children have all three.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4621/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to misappropriate Misappropriation of school funds of the plaintiff which is the responsibility of the defendant. A request by the defendant forced to return the funds plus interest to the plaintiff. Indictment is returned to retrieve property from the defendant to take plaintiff's property. Abuse as the plaintiff has the right to own property, which took back on track and Commercial Code Section 1336 is not a legal action against the violation occurred, but information. No man is the subject of age, in violation of provisions of the Commercial Code, Section 448 and the prosecution the right to take property back from the track have no right to rely on the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1336 with no time limit. the owner of property rights, such as this. The plaintiff's case does not terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4466/2551.
Civil complaint, the parties do not have to lift up the laws cited in the complaint only. Alleged facts and arguments that the defendant is liable enough. Court shall have the power to lift up to fine law to judge the case by the fact that the availability of Section 134 P.wi.po. case the plaintiff to sue government agencies and officials to liability for infringement. Must be in accordance with the Act, the liability of the officers violated the Act as the court has the power to bring such cases to adjust to this.
Archery bow of the incident is used as the Department of English drama, the four defendants responsible for teaching these students, so in addition to the four defendants will have to do to teach students knowledge in the Thai language. Also considered the four defendants have been assigned to students who have a child to be safe. To behave in the regulations of the school. Not to cause a lot of trouble for any damages to others that accused the four students to order school supplies to bow to the four defendants should be used carefully. Anticipated or foreseen that the bow may be harmful to your body. If they used to play on each shot and did not order the defendant to four students to bow to the destroyed or stored in a safe or forbidden. To the bow to play. It appears that there are many other arrows in the classroom spaces, such as the nature of teaching practices, but generally follow four defendants and did not like is the lack of diligence and negligence. Not a circumstance beyond which can not be expected to occur at two petition by the defendant in any way. Case holding that the four defendants had violated the plaintiff's cause damage to the body. The defendant to four to teach English to students grade 2 school pharmacist. The duty governor as a representative of the defendant to 2 on the performance governor that the defendant, 4 the plaintiff one student. The English course damage to the body 2, the defendant must be liable to the plaintiff in violation of the defendant, 4 have done in the performance of duties. Tort Liability Act's Section 5, paragraph one of the officers.
Plaintiff has been damaged to the body has filed a charge in the Eye of 50,000 baht and damages for the loss of work capacity of 100,000 baht, the second defendant is liable for damages to the plaintiff under the law. Even if someone donated the money to the plaintiff, and then some, it may not liability. Like the law of the defendant to be reduced to 2 with Is not the money that the school pharmacist. And the defendant, 5 assist the plaintiff of 35,000 deducted from the damages that the court require the defendant to two shall be liable for damages to the plaintiff by the defendant to second petition that Sreouthrnntprc 4 the cost. treatment and compensation of 30,000 baht for the loss of work ability or a total of 50,000 Baht 80,000 Baht per se but to the circumstances and severity of the violation. And that the plaintiff has caused damage to voluntarily risk playing archery. Put together with the defendant, 5 and 5, it is the defendant liable under the civil court was also absent from the Court of Appeal in Region 4 and the appropriate compensation, both the total amount of 80,000 baht is not an amount higher than the reality.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3621/2551.
When the water pump to the plaintiff in the plaintiff's fishing pond with water due to plant toxins. The defendant's release effluents into public ditches, and cause the fish in the pond of fish. The plaintiff's death. The defendant can not prove that Water from the plant of the defendant to drain into the sewer ditch and flowing into the public. The water is clear and free of chemicals harmful to living organisms. Including fish in the fish pond of the plaintiff. Testimony alone, without thinking No other evidence supported only by expert witnesses. There is no weight to listen. Weight of evidence of the plaintiff than the defendant's evidence. Listening to the fact that Because the fish in the pond fish caused by the death of the plaintiff, the defendant violated.
Although plaintiffs do not have evidence that shows obvious damage. But the circumstance of the case attest that the plaintiff show damage of the fish in fish ponds of the plaintiff. The court shall determine the appropriate damages to the plaintiff's circumstances and severity of abuse.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3103/2551.
Cases, the plaintiff sued the defendant to pay damages for breach of data that has the issue in dispute. Just what damage the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the burden of proof. To decide whether the plaintiff has been damaged just do it. Required to attest the facts from which the parties are finished. When the plaintiff's attorney stated for the plaintiff as successor Sat oral testimony first. The plaintiff confirmed that S. sees the occupation of the plaintiff. When not listening to the testimony would not know that Sat is to see hear or know about the message on to give witness to come with their own direct or not, and the plaintiff's evidence on the issue will attest. This is as much weight. Circumstances of the plaintiff does not delay the case. The District Court concluded that the urgent Sat know the facts about the plaintiff's career is a direct witnesses to abstain. The plaintiff's mouth. The plaintiff will have claims itself as a witness only one mouth. Then by the courts have not heard the full facts first. Determines that the District Court did not comply with the provisions of Civil Procedure on the consideration of Section 243 (2).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2335/2551.
The first plaintiff and the defendant at a separate damages or claims that a defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff as the first of two parts. The first part of the damages, including loss of property which is land. Building town houses of the first plaintiff has been damaged by any one who has not estimated correctly and the survey by the Institute, which both Within both parties agree that a defendant in October 2537, the contractor will be responsible for damage that occurred, and values. Spending in all polls. The second part, including claims of nuisance and safety Nuisance trouble about Life and Health. The damage to the latter part of this defendant, one has to pay to the plaintiff that an extensive period of time since the dispute until the month in December 2537 and a 500,000 baht, but if the construction of the structure of the building is not completed within the period of the defendant, one also. to give compensation to the plaintiff that a more per month 35,000 baht since January January 2538 onwards are not calculated together plaintiffs who first is still entitled to receive compensation for damages in the property which the Agreement Article 1 of the plaintiff. The first received no pay.
Agreement Article 1. It says. Damage to buildings that could damage buildings Town House Law is implemented. Survey Institute, which both parties agree by March in October 2537 not to agree to pay much money. The parties agreed to pay when and where and how the agreement is still a defendant liable for violation of the original debt. Is not an agreed settlement between the plaintiff and defendant, a memorandum of agreement which will make such a compromise agreement. The liability of a defendant in violation of debt remains the third defendant, who must be hired jointly liable for the defendant to have an under the Commercial Code, Section 428.
The contract the defendant first must be constructed according to plan and order the defendant to 3 on the defendant to three of employment, a fault in the work order to do so must share with the defendant, a contractor liable for the. that a plaintiff's damages arising from the construction of large-scale protests, which have a house. House and various buildings. Located close to each other before.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1104/2551.
The 5-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/33 (a) is a prescription for a debt unpaid interest. But debt is a claim that the defendants violated the plaintiff will have to pay to reduce Instead of the plaintiff's damages. Owe money to the defendant to the plaintiff to pay all the days immediately after the default is. Date of violation to do so to. Non-interest income is due to have an age limit of 5 years under Section 193/33 (a) and interest in the case of debt arising from a data breach law has no age. Particularly sensitive. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 874/2551.
The plaintiff is a corporate type company. Would be expressed by the representative of the plaintiff is authorized to sign on behalf of the plaintiff under the Commercial Code, Section 70 paragraph two S. Position Maintenance Position Wed network and director of the emergency repair network cable. is the only employee of the plaintiff. Even to hear that both of the reason has been breached and Wed which is a power to fix the company contracted to repair and complete B.. This act is considered as a representative of the plaintiff and the recognition that The plaintiff company is the company violated the defendant from the crime scene on June 15, 2540 Sat and Wed, but it has the power only in the framework of their duties only, and no power to prosecute Accused in the case where the defendant did not pay for repairs to the plaintiff is not considered to be Wed to Sat, and representatives of the plaintiff in the old sense of the claim under article 448, paragraph one of the 1 year old, so therefore Start from the Board authorized the plaintiff knew of the infringement and should be aware of. Not require compensation from the Sor Por know when or authorized the infringement of the plaintiff and should be aware of the value is used. Claims on August 10, 2541, the same day authorized the filing of this lawsuit. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on August 19, 2541 does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 516/2551.
Power to sue in the plaintiff's case is the result of the actions of the employee in violation of that. Employment, or agency of the defendant. However, because the plaintiff received physical disabilities and brain injuries have been affected. And unable to help themselves to action that day. The plaintiff then sued his wife, the case on behalf of the plaintiff, it appeared that the complaint that Before filing this lawsuit that. The application to the Central Juvenile and Family Court asking the court ordered that the plaintiff is a person As incompetent and set that. As custodian Central Juvenile and Family Court, but not an order. Later, after plaintiff filed this case, the Central Juvenile and Family Court ordered that Plaintiff's symptoms are not as incompetent. But they look insane person under Commercial Code, Section 28, it ordered that The plaintiff is incompetent and that stay in the nursery. Listening to the facts, so that The plaintiff is a person of unsound mind since that. So while applying for the plaintiff filed this lawsuit is a person of unsound mind, which is considered a disability under Section 56 Civil Code Procedure plaintiff may offer the accused the court must comply with the provisions of such laws by Must have a guardian as the representative. But litigation is not a court order that set. Is that the plaintiff curator. Are not entitled on behalf of the plaintiff was accused of offering itself. Which is the only deficiency in talent. Is not no power to sue. When the Central Juvenile and Family Court to order that set. Is that the plaintiff curator. Are authorized to bid on behalf of the plaintiff in the plaintiff's charges. The defect in this ability to edit old as amended by Section 56 on a request to the court and the court's order that set. A preschool and then act on behalf of the plaintiff. Because they lack in talent away. The plaintiff filed a bug, but instead shall be completed by the beginning of this fix.
Defendant to the plaintiff to violate the plaintiff's injury, severe physical disabilities. Brain has been affected until the court as incompetent. Loss of ability to work entirely in the present and future, must resign from the government even if the plaintiff does not attest to the damage of course. Courts have the power to determine the compensation to be reasonable for the circumstances and severity of the violation if the defendant claims that the incident did not violate it unlikely that plaintiff would receive government until Retired or not. And may receive the pension. It is the right of the plaintiff to be the favorite already. Not related to the liability of the defendant.
Expenses in the hospital for a television and refrigerator in room patients. The electrical equipment necessary to facilitate patients and people look after The hospital provided in the room already. Is a necessary cost to pay to the plaintiff. Defendant is liable to the plaintiff.
The Supreme Court 8271 - 8272/2550.
Defendant, a government official accused the Department of Highway 2 when the accident the defendant driving a vehicle of the Government to inspect the scene and collided with a car that is driving m m cause with two passengers in the car. dead. Despite official order filed with the Village, but even the opinion of the officer under investigation is not reported as fact. Appear in the Court of Criminal cases do not have a P.wi.o. Section 46 of the civil courts. Facts, the court need not hold the opinion of the officers. Diagnostic evidence in this case would be as the parties attest
In case of violation of many people who do. A violation of everyone must share liability for damage caused by the violation of the plaintiff in full.
Costs relating to merit a funeral. Making history book of the dead and the value of the gift distribution in funeral So as to pay for expenses necessary and appropriate management. The funeral of the deceased plaintiff is entitled to a claim by the two defendants, even a plaintiff who is also a minor, and his wife, Wed ผoogแdnodicobhrnrnam is not married to the deceased did not make. Liability in this part of the two defendants is reduced.
Why even abuse cases occurred before Tort Liability Act, the enforcement officer, but when the plaintiff filed this case in four days. The enforcement of this Act. The plaintiff's right to sue state officials or agencies to liability for breach is. Must be in accordance with this Act, so when the case appears that the defendants violated a plaintiff to act in the performance of the second defendant the plaintiff is forbidden to sue the defendant under Section 1 of 5. Tort Liability Act, the staff that this problem even without a party, but a petition which raised issues concerning law. With public order. The Supreme Court has the power to raise their own decision as Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8615/2550.
Both lectures this case the plaintiff sued the defendant for damages, alleging that the defendant took. The plaintiff sued both false in court. The plaintiff intends to both criminal penalties. Both the plaintiff was damaged-looking criminal charges. It is a civil lawsuit related to criminal cases. Both the plaintiff filed a criminal defendant is charged with filing false and perjury. Case is under consideration by the Court of First Instance. The lawsuit filed this claim in the data, which violate the penalties must be used Criminal Code statute of which is longer than the force Which under the provisions of Section defendant was sued as criminal offenses that Maximum penalty of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, this case is 10 years old and does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7673/2550.
Plaintiff to drive motorcycles at high speed. As well as the junction with the plaintiff's car had to slow down to avoid an accident when the plaintiff did not perform correctly under the Road Traffic Act 2522 Section 70 of negligence, the plaintiff has in it. "
Taxi car accident is the second defendant's name and seal of the defendant attached to the second door on both sides. People who have seen the need to understand that the defendant's car at two of the defendants 2 to allow a defendant to bring a car to go get the passengers on behalf of two defendants accused publicly by the two beneficiaries with Was accused of two manipulation to the defendant that a representative of the defendant at 2 in the loading of passengers accused the two are liable to third parties of good faith, as if the defendant, a representative of the person under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 821, and must jointly liable for the actions of the defendant that a violation of the plaintiff under Section 427 of the 425 defendants 3 and 4 are not limited liability partnership of the two defendants are also jointly liable with
Result of a violation of the defendant to the plaintiff's damages must be disabled. Disability is incurred other damage which is not monetary. Plaintiffs to claim damages by this section. Decision and the Court shall have power to appropriate to the circumstances and the seriousness of the violation. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 438.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6291/2550.
Debt that the defendant received a letter of liability to the plaintiff for damage caused by the defendant. Is that the plaintiff's attorney. Which is considered as a plaintiff and the defendant as agent Civil litigation and the defendant did not call back loans, but Por fake compromise agreement that the defendant was sued Por Por and have committed to a compromise settlement to the plaintiff liable to the plaintiff damages. Damage incurred by the plaintiff is caused by the defendant is not represented by the Commercial Code, Section 812, which contain no provisions on age, especially Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30 debt liability under the letter is not the case for violation of the required age of 1 year under section 420, 448.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4352/2550.
Damages to the lost do not come because of work under the Commercial Code, Section 443, paragraph two of the abuse claims need to remember the victims do not die. But the lost do not come because of work only. Find it claims that the violations need to use it after the injured victims. The dead, with no
Judgement of the Supreme Court 928/2550.
Both the lower court sentenced the defendant to pay 1 to 2 share the lack of wireless support 240,000 baht, with 7.5 percent interest per annum from the date of the violation until the payment is made. Which is equal to the co-pay each plaintiff cared for 120,000 baht plus interest. The value which the plaintiff Value cremate two togetherValue cremate both the lower court for Both defendants liable for 66,800 baht and 7.5 percent interest per year from the date of the violation. Although indebted to the plaintiff, both a right to participate can not be separated owe the plaintiff's individual, but when combined with the lack of wireless support the rights of the plaintiff, each not exceeding 200,000 baht funds to settlement for the defendant to one. 2, with each person in the plaintiff class is not more than 200,000 petition to prohibit the petition in fact Civil Code Procedure Section 248, paragraph one
The two defendants did not make a fight in which both the plaintiff received compensation from insurance companies. Then an issue since the defendant in a civil court even if the second layer will attest, it is considered a non-attest to the forbidden or approved by Civil Code Procedure considered is the fact that Section 87 does not raise the same admonition. ago by the likes of First Instance. And Court of Appeal Region 3 and not with problems concerning public order. Forbidden to petition under Section 249, paragraph one
Money to help the two defendants made a corpse for 10,000 baht to help the plaintiff Peongspo two parts according to humanitarian principles. The second defendant is not a help with the funeral and did not confess to deliver as part of compensation. But the merit in a manner in which the moral conscience. Therefore be offset against the amount the plaintiff Peongspo both claim not to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 923/2549.
The lease agreement will be made and such rent as agreed, then. Would hold a lease. Room without prior notice. Defendant, a tenant is required to return the building to rent to the lessor of the plaintiff that the defendant refused to return the building to rent. A breach of the lease and the defendant also owned building leased to the plaintiff. Agree to act in violation of the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall be entitled to claim damages from both defendants for infringement and breach of contract based only on the base penalty claims breach of contract, then take the plaintiff can not exercise. Claims for infringement can. Because it damages the same case information.
Lease agreement, Room No. 10, Article 1, paragraph two indicate that When the lease maturity or terminated for any reason, "the lease" to deliver facilities leased back to the "lessor" immediately if the "tenant" can not deliver facilities leased back to the "lessor. "Lessee" agrees to pay the fine, "Lessor" 2000 baht a day after the due date until the date of delivery of delivery of the leased facilities back to the "lessor" already The agreement set forth in damages if the lessee did not breach of contract. Can deliver the building to rent back to the lessor immediately. The plaintiff has the right to damages under the lease, but the second paragraph of Article 1 of penalty is set too high section Courts have the power was reduced to a reasonable number of the Commercial Code, Section 383 has.
Lease agreement, Room No. 11, Article 8, paragraph two states that when a termination of the lease, then no matter if any "tenant" must move away from the rental immediately. If not, exit to allow for damages and fines amounting to 2,000 baht per day, "Lessor" every day until they move away. Specified conditions to allow damages only if the termination of the lease as the lease is different from building, Room No. 10, but even if the lease expires or terminated at the expiration of the lease not The conditions that the plaintiff will be entitled to claim breach of contract, the base rent. But plaintiffs also claim damages for infringement by the defendant which the plaintiff described. Attest to the prosecution and the number of damages caused by violations, then. The court has the power to determine damages appropriate to the circumstances and the severity of the Commercial Code, Section 438 violates the first paragraph.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3913/2548.
Both plaintiffs sued to force the two defendants jointly liable with the employer as a defendant, an employee who violated the plaintiff, both in the official employment. When the defendant to an action in violation of the plaintiff, both defendants two are also jointly liable with the defendant, one of the effects of abuse that the defendant, 3, a managing partner of the defendant to two, it must be jointly liable on all debts of the defendant to two by unlimited number of the Commercial Code, Section 1077 (2), 1087.
Determining the compensation shall be used solely by any such place. Be appropriate to the circumstances under the circumstances and the seriousness of the violation. While the incident that a plaintiff is 14 years old studying in grade 2, which would continue to operate career are as sober people. After the accident the plaintiff had symptoms of an unconscious cerebral edema. Skull collapsed. Bleeding under the scalp must be treated with surgery of the skull. Treatment may take a year longer. After surgery, then a plaintiff who remains in a brain does not recognize. Can not help themselves unable to say all the time to hire an administrator and does not appear to be able to keep a plaintiff who healed them. Now that a plaintiff can not help themselves like this. Would allow a plaintiff to lose the ability to follow the career of a completely plaintiff has been damaged. Regardless of whether they must be professional in any way that a plaintiff must suffer from the surgery and Thung disabilities can not help themselves throughout life. Both the lower court for damages to a plaintiff who lost the ability to work as a payment of $ 500,000 and other compensation for damage other than the monetary amount of $ 500,000 and appropriate.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2341/2548.
While the accident the boy Rs. Son of the plaintiff driving vehicles change the channel bus from the field bus 2, a channel bus 1, and away from the intersection about 30 meters, which is where the car will turn right to close the far right of the bus. as Road Traffic Act if the defendant, who ran in a channel on a bus to slow down the speed of the car to slow down like other vehicles, it is not an accident car crash. Motorcycles to ride in front. It can be stopped immediately. After the accident the defendant does not help that one. And does not represent a notification to the competent official. Which the circumstances of the offense and knew that he fled. Because collision is caused by the negligence of the defendant: 1.
The lack of benefit to the mother of the boy-Rs. Does not constitute a job during the monitored care boys Rs. Not damage the boy Rs. Should call in case people do abuse the boy Rs. The boys Rs. Has been. injury to body or health under Commercial Code, Section 444, 445 and 446.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1409/2548.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 443 paragraph three of the violations that led him to death if the person liable to be no lack of specific support that the deceased is responsible for legal support, but Section 1563 and Section 1564 provided for the children and parents must support each other raising the children and parents by means legitimate only There are no provisions define the rights and obligations to support parents need child illegitimate child illegitimate father, so even certified as eligible The Dharma heir legacy of his father. But I do not claim the dependent care from parents. Has no right to take legal action without support from the lack of violations.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6303/2547.
A. the boy must be disabled. Can not walk normally, and excretion. A. have held that the boy has lost the ability of future work in progress and destruction of life that can not be damaged by the occupation, it is normal. Damage that can not be entirely the work of present and future time when the defendant's violation of the first boy to be handicapped for life a.. The two plaintiffs damages for the loss of the ability to work as Commercial Code, Section 444, paragraph one, and disability that occurs also in case of damage to your beloved. Suffering both physically and mentally a very serious boy is born with g, while only 6 years old, both the plaintiff has no right to claim damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 446 money with damages. does not overlap and do not damage the same.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2110/2547.
Car of the plaintiff was the defendant, one who is an employee of the defendant to two violations, the official employment on February 26, 2539, Governor of Khon Kaen province has ordered a Board Investigations into the liability in civil later, on July 12. Investigation Committee for 2539 male civil liability to a report of investigation submitted to the Governor of Khon Kaen province that Two defendants are responsible for all civil. The Deputy Governor of Khon Kaen province, Acting. The governor of Khon Kaen acknowledge on July 13, 2539 Later, Khon Kaen province to investigate a report of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health The Acting Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Health Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Health signed. Acknowledged on October 7, 2539 it held that the plaintiff was aware of abuse and should be aware of the need to use Loss on October 7, 2539 plaintiff filed the case on August 4, 2540 does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5128/2546.
Money that the plaintiff received from the Social Security Office is the compensation that the plaintiff should be entitled to the conditions and rules of the Compensation Act 2537 Section 18 is not compensation for violations. The plaintiff has no right to claim lack of support under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 443 paragraph three, the defendant can not be taken for compensation to the plaintiff should be entitled to such exemption for the lack of wireless support is.
The lack of wireless support is a debt arising from a data breach that has occurred from the time a violation is not aimed at debt in the future. And the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 206 accounts in default shall be deemed to violate the time to do. The plaintiff shall be entitled to charge interest rates of 7.5 percent per year, the lack of wireless support, a debt default one in the first paragraph of section 224.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5751/2544.
The State Railway of Thailand can not send a defendant to 9, both the plaintiff and other passengers on the train to derail it in front of the nine defendants duty is to provide other transportation vehicles, both the plaintiff and other passengers to give up. Destination, which of the passenger under the Civil and Commercial Code Section 608609 and the Act of State Railway of Thailand, the Section 9 (7) unloading passengers of the defendant, 3, 5 and 8 of the train of the defendant at 9 it appears to the plaintiff whole. Second and third parties that back and forth between the train station to the station L c. it is done instead of the defendant. 9 9 Nitiseampoanht between the defendant and the defendant to 3 to 5 and 8 are in position and the agent under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 797.
Non-monetary damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 446 means that the damage can not calculate the amount of such damage, but this might be the result. Stemmed from the need to remedy the violations, or replace the damage as well, which may have damaged more than damage to the body as well. Non-monetary losses such as Pain suffering the medical disability or disabilities to continue. Damage such as this that the court has legal authority to determine the circumstances and the bad. Strength of the violation. Losses due to non-monetary damages would be equivalent to attest how the amount is not in the body. Considering the nature of how wound healing, which have a bearing on the surgery and plaster cast multiple times. Have been treated for a long time in 3 years suffer the pain of the wound during treatment, which is a long time. Moreover, the left arm of the state that a plaintiff must be disabled for life and free personality as a result of surgery to the arm. Shorter than the left-right-hand man Treated as a non-monetary damages to the plaintiff. 1 would like to claim.
Plaintiff 2, to leave work to take care of the plaintiff at one with all that I need to earn money as expenses for medical treatment, Plaintiff 1, as well as the livelihood of the plaintiff that a round during the proceedings till the last for a long time. In addition, more than 10 years in the case of a violation of the plaintiff to claim interest from the date of such violation in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 206, but the plaintiffs did not claim an interest prior to filing with The lower court determined that both defendants pay interest at a rate of 9 percent per year, 15 of damages under the Civil Procedure Code, Section 142 (6) is well
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2046/2541.
In determining compensation for the violation shall be used solely by any such place. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 438, first paragraph, the court may order appropriate to the circumstances and The seriousness of the violation. When people across the damaged bridge. The car that the defendant was driving hit a bend in a joint bid documents and the only bridge repair that costs up to 364,800 baht, a large percentage of the forklift truck into the bridge. And up, and the wood for a scaffold supporting the bridge. Repair of the bridge point to be edited and changed. Structural steel for new money only 56,560 baht, however, plaintiff did not repair the bridge. Because the plaintiff has improved highways and the area is a 10 lane bridge has been demolished to. Assigned to the defendant used the plaintiff damages of 70,000 baht is appropriate.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3668/2540.
Ministry of Interior to order the plaintiff's release from a government order under the Civil Service Act BE 2495, Section 103 of the Civil Service Act BE 2485 Section 60 (2) and 62 administrative order is not a legal act. According to the Civil and Commercial Code. Need to adjust the timing of administrative cases. When the Civil Service Act has no deadline to sue to bring the case to the Court for the revocation of such order. Compared needed a law that is very similar characteristics violations under the Civil and Commercial Code Article 4, paragraph two of Article 448, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2751/2540.
Compensation for such violations. Return the property to pay the victim to abuse or use assets because it As well as the damages should be forced to use for any damage which has sparked up the meaning of section 438 with the second paragraph of the Commercial Code, so the lack of benefits derived from the rent it is considered. damages should one be forced to use to create more damage to itself. If the plaintiff's possession of a vehicle utilizing the dispute itself that a plaintiff shall be entitled to claim this section with When the plaintiff that a grant of possession use in the car dispute the plaintiff the 2 to make violation of the defendant has affected the rights of the plaintiff the 2 direct the plaintiff to 2, so shall be entitled to damages because of lack of benefit derived from the rent. the same like the one plaintiff without the plaintiff must have a second bond or equity in any one that is liable to a plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4109/2539.
The defendant, 2 the truck to park near the train even in the parking lot of the Port Authority of ordinary prudence would be expected that the train ride down the rails should have the freedom from obstructions enough. not appropriate to prevent the accident slick road traffic collision Act Wed. Since 2522, Section 57 (8) states that it is prohibited to park vehicles away from the rail, less than 15 meters, but the second defendant did not perform under that law, which enacted to protect others when the accused 2, the car to park in the accident, whether as a phase 2 meters or 1 meter, it is a violation of law that the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 422 to assume that the defendant 2. is the wrong defendant, two are in violation of the plaintiff and are subject to informal hiring defendant first must be jointly liable as an employer under Section 425 of the help. drive train with a speed of about 15 miles per hour when passing a curve see the parking area of a truck, several cars parked car near the defendant to two rail cars, but rather than help. Constant drive train with a speed same on closer in approximately 10 meters that can not drive past without incident grab collision, on the whistling danger with braking emergency, but could not stop the train on time in the state so Chor. Would be expected that people might grab the truck parked wrong train driving through the curve since then and that helps. Drive train speeds unchanged until the period which can not be stopped prior to the accident was considered help. The negligence by one, but the defendant, 2 the car to the park is not in a way that barrier rail clearly expect them to help. Need to take steps to stop the vehicle from surely will not see because the train runs along the rails, a force is the duty of leaders to park trucks will have to be careful over the negligence of the section. There are only two minor defendants are accused of negligence over the two to two-thirds of the liability for damages.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6905/2538.
According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 445 and Section 1567 shows that if parents or Mothers who have given the guardianship of children to work duties to one. Household and any person to appear on child abuse, which is bound by law Will have to work for their parents until the death of a violation shall pay the value. Claims is the lack of labor in the household must provide parents with the lack of labor. And filed with the lack of a labor action that does not mean the lack of free support calls. Section 443, paragraph three While the dead are still alive, the plaintiff, both parents dead people. Death that allows operation of the company. The plaintiff has established both the plaintiff and all. Second, it is authorized to act on behalf of the company but that company. As a separate entity to the deceased allows operation of the company that. Assumes that the operation of the plaintiff's death, helped both by the dead, and when not to. The plaintiff's death, both have to hire outsiders to work on behalf of death is hired. Work for the company that. If a case of lack of labor to Wor. Is the person who must find the right workers lack both the plaintiff did not sue the plaintiff has no power either. A lack of workers from the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5515/2538.
Movable ruler at the time was right to violate the settlement claims. From a breach by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 441 shall have the right to make a compromise agreement on the bill are made. Silk replacement as well. The defendant negligent driving by people driving cars Sat, had a compromise agreement between the defendant with a Sat in that contract would be enforceable. Mae. Is not the owner of the vehicle driver and shall make claims that each Parties take over, then the suspension under Section 852 plaintiff, a car insurer that S. Drive, which has been repairing cars is not subrogation. Requested by the accused.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6383/2537.
His wife has the right to take legal action for compensation from the other female identity and disclose to that They have sexual relations with her husband in the melody. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1521, paragraph two of compensation for damages as one means, including damage to the name. The sound of his wife and blessing. It was prescribed to them by the particular liability. Will take legal action for compensation by claiming a violation of rights under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 420 and Section 447 shall be paid compensation on a monthly basis. From the date of filing until the termination identity and cease to have similar sexual relationship with her husband not another.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4735/2534.
Representatives of the penalty the defendant ordered the plaintiff, both by the report of the Committee. Also held that the plaintiff did not know who should be liable for the claim. Later, the Investigation Committee for Civil Liability Report to the plaintiff's behalf by a hierarchy. Representative plaintiff acknowledged on November 18, 2523 is considered that the plaintiff should be aware of the need to use the compensation from that date. The plaintiff filed the case on November 3, 2524 does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3669/2531.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendants filed Lecture 1 to 3, functions as deliberate non-compliance convention Not supervise the receipt and sending money to the defendant as a result of 4 misappropriation of funds and allows the plaintiff to sue the plaintiff damages based on the data breach and the plaintiff shall be entitled to claim a impeachable The plaintiff sued the defendant to 1 to 3, the violation of general information. Data are not violated, which violate a criminal penalty. Is a 1 year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, first paragraph, which begins after the age. From the date of the injured student to abuse and should be aware of the need and the compensation in case of a juristic person injured shall be the date on which representatives of corporations know this. The plaintiff is under a boom Sanitation Sheriff Kumphawapi chaired by the position that a defendant when the accident as the Chief District Officer Kumphawapi notice that ordered the defendant to the criminal defendant to a four and the second was to surrender on the same day. Notice of such non-notification of the defendants 1, a representative of the plaintiff and defendant, a constituent accused, it would be deemed aware of who is liable, the other is not still considered not as a representative plaintiff knew of the infringement. and know who is liable to a prescription from the date that the plaintiff must be deemed aware of persons liable for violations related to the defendant on the new sheriff Kumphawapi note from the report of the committee responsible for civil investigations related. fraud exists. When the plaintiff sued to no more than one year does not terminate the case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2258/2527.
The three accused persons of Transportation Bus. Rented a car of the defendant to 2 to use the bus passengers of their by the defendant, one who is an employee of the defendant, 2 the drivers are considered to be the defendant, an agent of the defendant to 3 on the defendant to a drive passenger cars. negligently hit the plaintiff was injured the defendant, 3 have jointly liable for the consequences of violations, the defendant, one with even the employer of the plaintiff would be out of medical expenses to the plaintiff to then find the defendant, a person who commits violation. plaintiff's termination liability to pay medical expenses not plaintiff has a right to sue for medical expenses from all three defendants.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 56/2527.
Filing a claim for abuse caused by negligence in the civil case. Unlike a lawsuit to punish the defendant for the base offense criminal negligence that the plaintiff would have to describe all the actions the defendant claims to have done exactly the wrong for civil cases. When the plaintiff sued description shows that the violation of a violation is committed intentionally or negligently, it is enough to understand that living is the main pretext of what the plaintiff alleged.
Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant, a truck driver trawl boats than required by law, and with negligence in the absence of careful driving. The result was carried away on a trawl boat hit by a car telephone and telephone poles have been damaged the plaintiff. This shows clearly that the claim is based on the principle of the plaintiff's charges then.
The Supreme Court 1731 - 1732/2526.
Of the collision because the driver's negligence, the plaintiff and the defendants are together. And no less than each other. Damages is to fold together.
The liability of the defendant, an employee is accused of two payments which can not be separated. When the defendant second employer not liable. Justice of the Supreme Court would give effect to a defendant, except by petition.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1229/2517.
Filing a claim for abuse caused by negligence in the civil case. Unlike a lawsuit to punish the defendant for the base offense criminal negligence. The plaintiff must sue to describe all the actions the defendant claims to have done wrong, as clearly defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158 for a civil case. When the plaintiff sued description shows that the violation of a violation is committed intentionally or negligently. Is enough to be understood that the claims based primarily charged with the plaintiff's how
The plaintiff sued the lecture. With the absence of negligence in the care of the driver driving the car registration number. E.b. 03951 3 and the defendant's network. Employee driving a vehicle registration number. C 0.00331 defendants 1, 2, causing the car two cars collided. Because of these collisions cause the containers of beer and soda bottles, which carried on the truck, vehicle registration number 00331 August fell on the plaintiff's car drive up and explode. Cause serious injury, the plaintiff has shown by clear, which is mainly based claims of the plaintiff's charges under the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 172.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1204/2517.
Filing a claim for abuse caused by the negligence of other civil action to punish the defendant for the base offense by criminal negligence. The plaintiff must describe all the action claiming the defendant was clearly guilty under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158, describes for the civil lawsuit when the plaintiff shows that a violation of a breach is committed intentionally or negligently. Is enough to understand that. Claims based primarily on the charges of what the plaintiff.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Lorry driver Mr Move a registration number. C. 00331, which carried the beer and soda. Slick was driving collided with a car registration number 03951 E.b. why are beer and soda spill fall from car Was a 5252 vehicle registration number U.d. insured with the plaintiff's damages. Why grab a car collision occurred because of the negligence of the driver and vehicle registration number 00221 Aug motorists E.b. registration number is 03951 as shown by clear which claims to live by the principle of the plaintiff's charges. Code of Civil Procedure and Section 172.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2010/2515.
Prosecution of a defendant, which took back the property of the plaintiff by the breach is not subject to prescription under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448.
Claims for damages from the defendant took the ground that the seizure documents and check from the plaintiff. (And then refused to return and terminate the case. And all rights to receive money from the bank) that the plaintiff has the right to demand compensation for damages when violations occur. Must be the age, the date of damage to the plaintiff. Not know the date of offense And should know who will need compensation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1016/2497.
Compensation for the violation. The court may require appropriate to the circumstances and the case May be calculated according to the court that the defendant received benefit from the violation. Without any charges.
Furthermore, include compensation for the victim to return the property lost because of abuse or the price of such property, including damages, which should be used to enforce any damage. Which was created by itself.
Section 439 a person must return the property to pay other people because of their abuse is also responsible for all of the property is destroyed by accident or become impossible to restore property by reason otherwise. Accident or property is detrimental to the accident itself. Except when the property is destroyed or becomes impossible or detrimental to the night, although there do not abuse it would be rejected like that in itself.
Section 440 requires that if a person has taken his wealth to good use if the price of the property less good because the damage. The injured party is called the interest amount will have to make up time from which the location of the base price is about time.
Article 441 If a person must use to claims. Any damage. It took the better of his movable property. Or because the damage to his good. With the compensation to individuals who dominate it at the time the property taken or when the damage is already because of the disengagement shall be used for such Even outsiders are expected to own property or other rights over such property. Unless the rights of third parties such as the person who knows or does not know because of their gross negligence.
Section 442 if damage occurs because the fault of any one of the injured include know that You, the provisions of Section 223 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Section 443 of the case led him to death, including claims. Value cremate including the cost of other necessary too.
If you did not die immediately. Compensation includes medical expenses and damages to the lost do not come because of work itself.
If that is the cause of death to any person to lack of free legal support also know that That person that you would like to receive compensation for it.
Section 444 in case of damage to body or health that the injured prefer to pay costs which they must pay, and compensation for the lost capacity of work completely or partly in the current time, and at. future time.
If in the courts is impossible to be sure intuition that the damage he has indeed how The court said in that sentence to Reserves the right to modify the sentence again within a period not exceeding two years.
Section 445 of the case led him to death or injury to body or health better if he lost the freedom better. If the injured. Are bound by the law would require you to work as individuals. Outside the household or outside the industry know that You need to remember that the person who claims would have required compensation to a third party to which he is to be a lack of workers with
Section 446 If the damage to his body or health. If he loses the freedom The injured to demand compensation for the damage out something else which is not the money with more time. Claims which are not transferable and do not fall prosperity to the heir unless the right conditions, it has been earmarked by the contract or has begun to bring a lawsuit under the right then.
Furthermore, because women have damaged any criminal wrong doing is to their moral Durn it would have similar claims.
Section 447 allows any person to damage his reputation to be damaged when they requested the court may order the person to make appropriate management. The good reputation of the back instead of using damages or compensation by time and use.
Section 448 claims for damages caused, but the data breach. You that expire after one year from the date of the injured student to. Should be aware of the violation and require compensation or after ten years. But the date of the violation.
But if the claims data in which the offense. Punishable under criminal law of the old and the criminal is longer than the above know that You took the life of the longer comes into force.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 10878/2551.
The plaintiff's complaint alleged that the defendants 1 to 4, which conspired to www.ccbenchmarking.com Directors in a meeting of directors and has agreed to sell land to the eight defendants. The directors and shareholders of the Company and third parties at a price lower than the price. Assessment and the market price of the company is damaged. Violations perpetrated by the company. In a manner which claims that the director causing damage to the company. When it appears that the company refused to sue a defendant to the 4 that its board of directors. The plaintiff, a shareholder of the Company shall have the power to remove the case B. This was to admonish the defendant claims 1 to 4, the director of the Commercial Code Section 1169 as the first paragraph and the plaintiff shall have the authority to request enforcement. Accused 1 and 2, the Land Board to transfer the 25 to convert back to corporations. If it can not be transferred back to the land instead. Because the property is returned or the person is classified as a claim for violation of the Commercial Code as provided in paragraph 438, but the plaintiff has no power to force the defendant to sue for 5 to 8, which is not the liability of Directors to transfer land. 19 converted back to the company or pay compensation to the company. It is not in accordance with the rules and Commercial Code, Section 1169, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8888/2551.
The three defendants from the Director of the School since November 6, 2535 the defendant has no duty to control third commander in charge of various operations. The school since that date. Shall not be liable for the defendant to a misappropriation of funds from the November 6, 2535 onwards, but the Department of General Education, the plaintiff does not attest to that funds the defendant a misappropriation until the defendant to three retired Director of the school. number. Shall not be assigned to the three defendants jointly liable for the entire amount.
General Education Department, the Department of plaintiff is in the government's Department of General Education, a Department of General Administration of Education is authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff and attorney. With the prosecution. According to State Administration. The provisions of the law can not be used for general corporate seal to be of Plaintiff to sign the power of attorney to prosecute to the plaintiff.
On the General Education Department complaint against the plaintiff police officer even considered that The plaintiff knew of the infringement and then. I have not considered the plaintiff aware of it should require compensation on such date by when the Investigation Committee investigation is completed and the report of the investigation to the Director of General Education Department that accused the three who should be the compensation by then considered the plaintiff to know. and knowing violation. ID should be required from such claims. Appears that the Acting Deputy Director General of the Department of General Education, received the report of investigation. Committee's inquiry on July 14, 2537 plaintiffs filed suit on July 13, 2538 and does not expire.
The third defendant fails to comply with the Regulations of the Ministry of Finance and keep the money and bringing money to send. Warehouse District, and the duties of District 2520 Article 20 and Article 37 by the three defendants not to appoint auditors to get paid daily to check the receipts and payments on a daily basis is why can not verify. found the defendant guilty of negligence, thus one of the three defendants are not related to the provisions of the Tort Liability Act 2539 authorities enforce these provisions, because after the events of this case. To the provisions of that law to apply to this case can not
The second defendant was appointed by the three defendants to be responsible for overseeing the review and check for payment to be chairman storage. Money for the defendant on count 2, is not a review of the pay day according to Ministry of Finance. To keep the money and bringing money to send the library functions of the District 2520 District and Article 20 and Article 37 of the third defendant is liable for the consequences of the negligence of such person.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7518/2551.
Plaintiff's complaint claims that All three defendants are officers of the plaintiff under. The impaired performance. Be careful not to store supplies. Does not ensure that the supplies were stored exactly as it appears in inventory control accounts or not. The result was that inventory kept in the storage room inventory loss. Claims that the three defendants took the property in the manner and taking possession. Property is non-refundable. Claims based primarily on the charges of the plaintiff's complaint is a matter of using Claims for damages caused, but the data violated the one-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one, not the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 plaintiff filed this lawsuit after the expiration of one year. from the date of knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. Plaintiff's claims, so terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5588/2551.
In addition, the plaintiff's complaint that the defendant, will present the two together intentionally compromised. Clearing and digging ponds and fish in the land of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also sued another lecture that Alternatively, the two defendants with negligence action. Check that the defendant did not land either as a land invasion of the defendant or both. This action by negligence is a criminal offense when they are prescribed. It expressly provides that such negligence is a fault. But action by the negligence of two defendants sued by the plaintiff in the lecture. This case is not in any form. Por the Forest Act or other laws of land or any criminal penalty. The plaintiff filed this complaint it is alleged that the defendants violated both the. The plaintiff only Not confirm that the two defendants guilty criminal is not in the age of criminal. Longer than the force. But requires a prescription, violation of the Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the plaintiff have to claims for damages within one year from the date the plaintiff knew of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims.
The two defendants to take possession and then Unnsrngrong clearing of mangrove forest to serve without the right to ever come like this. Can be considered as a continuing violation since the plaintiffs ever to detect. It will feature such acts continue to attest that the plaintiff has proven that. So long as the two defendants did not give away. Violations still exist, which is why the plaintiff may enforce any claims. Until the two defendants to stop making violations. In the past one year to sue the two defendants do not stop the abuse. The plaintiff has the right to claim back a year from the date of the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit until August 31, 2542 the damages from a violation of both the defendant back a year from the date filed. Does not terminate the. For damages in excess of one year only and expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5391/2551.
In the case of civil court judge must hold the facts as they appear in the Judgement of the Criminal Cases under Section 46 Criminal Code Procedure appeared to stop listening to the facts in the criminal case, but only that both the plaintiff and other defendants. Negligence. However, any negligence over the same does not appear so in the civil case, both the plaintiff and the defendant shall be attest to see who recklessly over each other and should be subject to damages from the other party, just do it Court case of pricey to be. in accordance with the provisions of the law also requires. Person's civil liability. Regardless of whether the defendant is sentenced or not the offense that P.wi.o. Section 47 paragraph one and the provisions of the law on the liability of individuals in civil cases in different Parties negligence caused the debt in violation of this Section 442 Commercial Code, the provisions of Section 223 shall apply mutatis mutandis Article 223, paragraph one, which is important is that the damage has occurred because of which side is. generate less. What is more just and Article 438, paragraph one states that the court decision on compensation appropriate to the circumstances and the bad. Therefore, the abuse of power that can claim damages from the defendants that the plaintiff was required to prove that Than the plaintiff and the defendants recklessly damaged by the negligence of any more, just how is the Court of First Instance in civil cases the plaintiff has the power to decide whether the defendant who is a party. Negligence, anytime. Not contrary to the Criminal Court in the case. The District Court ruled that. Negligence, rather than the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4751/2551.
The plaintiff filed a descriptive meaning that The plaintiff is the lawful wife of S., who died with three children who died who are responsible for the plaintiff and child care support all three of the plaintiff. The defendant made a violation a cause of death is dead, the three sons of the plaintiff and the plaintiff. Have no lack of support. Therefore like to call the lack of child support without the plaintiff and the plaintiff such a meaningful enough to understand that. Three sons like to call the plaintiff's claim as a sure enough of their rights. But because of the three sons of a minor plaintiff has not filed or the case itself. The plaintiff then sued the mother and Representatives for election instead. Would hold that the plaintiff sued on behalf of children with all three by default. The plaintiff has the power to take legal action without the lack of support of minor children have all three.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4621/2551.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to misappropriate Misappropriation of school funds of the plaintiff which is the responsibility of the defendant. A request by the defendant forced to return the funds plus interest to the plaintiff. Indictment is returned to retrieve property from the defendant to take plaintiff's property. Abuse as the plaintiff has the right to own property, which took back on track and Commercial Code Section 1336 is not a legal action against the violation occurred, but information. No man is the subject of age, in violation of provisions of the Commercial Code, Section 448 and the prosecution the right to take property back from the track have no right to rely on the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1336 with no time limit. the owner of property rights, such as this. The plaintiff's case does not terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4466/2551.
Civil complaint, the parties do not have to lift up the laws cited in the complaint only. Alleged facts and arguments that the defendant is liable enough. Court shall have the power to lift up to fine law to judge the case by the fact that the availability of Section 134 P.wi.po. case the plaintiff to sue government agencies and officials to liability for infringement. Must be in accordance with the Act, the liability of the officers violated the Act as the court has the power to bring such cases to adjust to this.
Archery bow of the incident is used as the Department of English drama, the four defendants responsible for teaching these students, so in addition to the four defendants will have to do to teach students knowledge in the Thai language. Also considered the four defendants have been assigned to students who have a child to be safe. To behave in the regulations of the school. Not to cause a lot of trouble for any damages to others that accused the four students to order school supplies to bow to the four defendants should be used carefully. Anticipated or foreseen that the bow may be harmful to your body. If they used to play on each shot and did not order the defendant to four students to bow to the destroyed or stored in a safe or forbidden. To the bow to play. It appears that there are many other arrows in the classroom spaces, such as the nature of teaching practices, but generally follow four defendants and did not like is the lack of diligence and negligence. Not a circumstance beyond which can not be expected to occur at two petition by the defendant in any way. Case holding that the four defendants had violated the plaintiff's cause damage to the body. The defendant to four to teach English to students grade 2 school pharmacist. The duty governor as a representative of the defendant to 2 on the performance governor that the defendant, 4 the plaintiff one student. The English course damage to the body 2, the defendant must be liable to the plaintiff in violation of the defendant, 4 have done in the performance of duties. Tort Liability Act's Section 5, paragraph one of the officers.
Plaintiff has been damaged to the body has filed a charge in the Eye of 50,000 baht and damages for the loss of work capacity of 100,000 baht, the second defendant is liable for damages to the plaintiff under the law. Even if someone donated the money to the plaintiff, and then some, it may not liability. Like the law of the defendant to be reduced to 2 with Is not the money that the school pharmacist. And the defendant, 5 assist the plaintiff of 35,000 deducted from the damages that the court require the defendant to two shall be liable for damages to the plaintiff by the defendant to second petition that Sreouthrnntprc 4 the cost. treatment and compensation of 30,000 baht for the loss of work ability or a total of 50,000 Baht 80,000 Baht per se but to the circumstances and severity of the violation. And that the plaintiff has caused damage to voluntarily risk playing archery. Put together with the defendant, 5 and 5, it is the defendant liable under the civil court was also absent from the Court of Appeal in Region 4 and the appropriate compensation, both the total amount of 80,000 baht is not an amount higher than the reality.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3621/2551.
When the water pump to the plaintiff in the plaintiff's fishing pond with water due to plant toxins. The defendant's release effluents into public ditches, and cause the fish in the pond of fish. The plaintiff's death. The defendant can not prove that Water from the plant of the defendant to drain into the sewer ditch and flowing into the public. The water is clear and free of chemicals harmful to living organisms. Including fish in the fish pond of the plaintiff. Testimony alone, without thinking No other evidence supported only by expert witnesses. There is no weight to listen. Weight of evidence of the plaintiff than the defendant's evidence. Listening to the fact that Because the fish in the pond fish caused by the death of the plaintiff, the defendant violated.
Although plaintiffs do not have evidence that shows obvious damage. But the circumstance of the case attest that the plaintiff show damage of the fish in fish ponds of the plaintiff. The court shall determine the appropriate damages to the plaintiff's circumstances and severity of abuse.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3103/2551.
Cases, the plaintiff sued the defendant to pay damages for breach of data that has the issue in dispute. Just what damage the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the burden of proof. To decide whether the plaintiff has been damaged just do it. Required to attest the facts from which the parties are finished. When the plaintiff's attorney stated for the plaintiff as successor Sat oral testimony first. The plaintiff confirmed that S. sees the occupation of the plaintiff. When not listening to the testimony would not know that Sat is to see hear or know about the message on to give witness to come with their own direct or not, and the plaintiff's evidence on the issue will attest. This is as much weight. Circumstances of the plaintiff does not delay the case. The District Court concluded that the urgent Sat know the facts about the plaintiff's career is a direct witnesses to abstain. The plaintiff's mouth. The plaintiff will have claims itself as a witness only one mouth. Then by the courts have not heard the full facts first. Determines that the District Court did not comply with the provisions of Civil Procedure on the consideration of Section 243 (2).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2335/2551.
The first plaintiff and the defendant at a separate damages or claims that a defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff as the first of two parts. The first part of the damages, including loss of property which is land. Building town houses of the first plaintiff has been damaged by any one who has not estimated correctly and the survey by the Institute, which both Within both parties agree that a defendant in October 2537, the contractor will be responsible for damage that occurred, and values. Spending in all polls. The second part, including claims of nuisance and safety Nuisance trouble about Life and Health. The damage to the latter part of this defendant, one has to pay to the plaintiff that an extensive period of time since the dispute until the month in December 2537 and a 500,000 baht, but if the construction of the structure of the building is not completed within the period of the defendant, one also. to give compensation to the plaintiff that a more per month 35,000 baht since January January 2538 onwards are not calculated together plaintiffs who first is still entitled to receive compensation for damages in the property which the Agreement Article 1 of the plaintiff. The first received no pay.
Agreement Article 1. It says. Damage to buildings that could damage buildings Town House Law is implemented. Survey Institute, which both parties agree by March in October 2537 not to agree to pay much money. The parties agreed to pay when and where and how the agreement is still a defendant liable for violation of the original debt. Is not an agreed settlement between the plaintiff and defendant, a memorandum of agreement which will make such a compromise agreement. The liability of a defendant in violation of debt remains the third defendant, who must be hired jointly liable for the defendant to have an under the Commercial Code, Section 428.
The contract the defendant first must be constructed according to plan and order the defendant to 3 on the defendant to three of employment, a fault in the work order to do so must share with the defendant, a contractor liable for the. that a plaintiff's damages arising from the construction of large-scale protests, which have a house. House and various buildings. Located close to each other before.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1104/2551.
The 5-year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/33 (a) is a prescription for a debt unpaid interest. But debt is a claim that the defendants violated the plaintiff will have to pay to reduce Instead of the plaintiff's damages. Owe money to the defendant to the plaintiff to pay all the days immediately after the default is. Date of violation to do so to. Non-interest income is due to have an age limit of 5 years under Section 193/33 (a) and interest in the case of debt arising from a data breach law has no age. Particularly sensitive. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 874/2551.
The plaintiff is a corporate type company. Would be expressed by the representative of the plaintiff is authorized to sign on behalf of the plaintiff under the Commercial Code, Section 70 paragraph two S. Position Maintenance Position Wed network and director of the emergency repair network cable. is the only employee of the plaintiff. Even to hear that both of the reason has been breached and Wed which is a power to fix the company contracted to repair and complete B.. This act is considered as a representative of the plaintiff and the recognition that The plaintiff company is the company violated the defendant from the crime scene on June 15, 2540 Sat and Wed, but it has the power only in the framework of their duties only, and no power to prosecute Accused in the case where the defendant did not pay for repairs to the plaintiff is not considered to be Wed to Sat, and representatives of the plaintiff in the old sense of the claim under article 448, paragraph one of the 1 year old, so therefore Start from the Board authorized the plaintiff knew of the infringement and should be aware of. Not require compensation from the Sor Por know when or authorized the infringement of the plaintiff and should be aware of the value is used. Claims on August 10, 2541, the same day authorized the filing of this lawsuit. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on August 19, 2541 does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 516/2551.
Power to sue in the plaintiff's case is the result of the actions of the employee in violation of that. Employment, or agency of the defendant. However, because the plaintiff received physical disabilities and brain injuries have been affected. And unable to help themselves to action that day. The plaintiff then sued his wife, the case on behalf of the plaintiff, it appeared that the complaint that Before filing this lawsuit that. The application to the Central Juvenile and Family Court asking the court ordered that the plaintiff is a person As incompetent and set that. As custodian Central Juvenile and Family Court, but not an order. Later, after plaintiff filed this case, the Central Juvenile and Family Court ordered that Plaintiff's symptoms are not as incompetent. But they look insane person under Commercial Code, Section 28, it ordered that The plaintiff is incompetent and that stay in the nursery. Listening to the facts, so that The plaintiff is a person of unsound mind since that. So while applying for the plaintiff filed this lawsuit is a person of unsound mind, which is considered a disability under Section 56 Civil Code Procedure plaintiff may offer the accused the court must comply with the provisions of such laws by Must have a guardian as the representative. But litigation is not a court order that set. Is that the plaintiff curator. Are not entitled on behalf of the plaintiff was accused of offering itself. Which is the only deficiency in talent. Is not no power to sue. When the Central Juvenile and Family Court to order that set. Is that the plaintiff curator. Are authorized to bid on behalf of the plaintiff in the plaintiff's charges. The defect in this ability to edit old as amended by Section 56 on a request to the court and the court's order that set. A preschool and then act on behalf of the plaintiff. Because they lack in talent away. The plaintiff filed a bug, but instead shall be completed by the beginning of this fix.
Defendant to the plaintiff to violate the plaintiff's injury, severe physical disabilities. Brain has been affected until the court as incompetent. Loss of ability to work entirely in the present and future, must resign from the government even if the plaintiff does not attest to the damage of course. Courts have the power to determine the compensation to be reasonable for the circumstances and severity of the violation if the defendant claims that the incident did not violate it unlikely that plaintiff would receive government until Retired or not. And may receive the pension. It is the right of the plaintiff to be the favorite already. Not related to the liability of the defendant.
Expenses in the hospital for a television and refrigerator in room patients. The electrical equipment necessary to facilitate patients and people look after The hospital provided in the room already. Is a necessary cost to pay to the plaintiff. Defendant is liable to the plaintiff.
The Supreme Court 8271 - 8272/2550.
Defendant, a government official accused the Department of Highway 2 when the accident the defendant driving a vehicle of the Government to inspect the scene and collided with a car that is driving m m cause with two passengers in the car. dead. Despite official order filed with the Village, but even the opinion of the officer under investigation is not reported as fact. Appear in the Court of Criminal cases do not have a P.wi.o. Section 46 of the civil courts. Facts, the court need not hold the opinion of the officers. Diagnostic evidence in this case would be as the parties attest
In case of violation of many people who do. A violation of everyone must share liability for damage caused by the violation of the plaintiff in full.
Costs relating to merit a funeral. Making history book of the dead and the value of the gift distribution in funeral So as to pay for expenses necessary and appropriate management. The funeral of the deceased plaintiff is entitled to a claim by the two defendants, even a plaintiff who is also a minor, and his wife, Wed ผoogแdnodicobhrnrnam is not married to the deceased did not make. Liability in this part of the two defendants is reduced.
Why even abuse cases occurred before Tort Liability Act, the enforcement officer, but when the plaintiff filed this case in four days. The enforcement of this Act. The plaintiff's right to sue state officials or agencies to liability for breach is. Must be in accordance with this Act, so when the case appears that the defendants violated a plaintiff to act in the performance of the second defendant the plaintiff is forbidden to sue the defendant under Section 1 of 5. Tort Liability Act, the staff that this problem even without a party, but a petition which raised issues concerning law. With public order. The Supreme Court has the power to raise their own decision as Civil Code Procedure Section 142 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8615/2550.
Both lectures this case the plaintiff sued the defendant for damages, alleging that the defendant took. The plaintiff sued both false in court. The plaintiff intends to both criminal penalties. Both the plaintiff was damaged-looking criminal charges. It is a civil lawsuit related to criminal cases. Both the plaintiff filed a criminal defendant is charged with filing false and perjury. Case is under consideration by the Court of First Instance. The lawsuit filed this claim in the data, which violate the penalties must be used Criminal Code statute of which is longer than the force Which under the provisions of Section defendant was sued as criminal offenses that Maximum penalty of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, this case is 10 years old and does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7673/2550.
Plaintiff to drive motorcycles at high speed. As well as the junction with the plaintiff's car had to slow down to avoid an accident when the plaintiff did not perform correctly under the Road Traffic Act 2522 Section 70 of negligence, the plaintiff has in it. "
Taxi car accident is the second defendant's name and seal of the defendant attached to the second door on both sides. People who have seen the need to understand that the defendant's car at two of the defendants 2 to allow a defendant to bring a car to go get the passengers on behalf of two defendants accused publicly by the two beneficiaries with Was accused of two manipulation to the defendant that a representative of the defendant at 2 in the loading of passengers accused the two are liable to third parties of good faith, as if the defendant, a representative of the person under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 821, and must jointly liable for the actions of the defendant that a violation of the plaintiff under Section 427 of the 425 defendants 3 and 4 are not limited liability partnership of the two defendants are also jointly liable with
Result of a violation of the defendant to the plaintiff's damages must be disabled. Disability is incurred other damage which is not monetary. Plaintiffs to claim damages by this section. Decision and the Court shall have power to appropriate to the circumstances and the seriousness of the violation. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 438.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6291/2550.
Debt that the defendant received a letter of liability to the plaintiff for damage caused by the defendant. Is that the plaintiff's attorney. Which is considered as a plaintiff and the defendant as agent Civil litigation and the defendant did not call back loans, but Por fake compromise agreement that the defendant was sued Por Por and have committed to a compromise settlement to the plaintiff liable to the plaintiff damages. Damage incurred by the plaintiff is caused by the defendant is not represented by the Commercial Code, Section 812, which contain no provisions on age, especially Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30 debt liability under the letter is not the case for violation of the required age of 1 year under section 420, 448.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4352/2550.
Damages to the lost do not come because of work under the Commercial Code, Section 443, paragraph two of the abuse claims need to remember the victims do not die. But the lost do not come because of work only. Find it claims that the violations need to use it after the injured victims. The dead, with no
Judgement of the Supreme Court 928/2550.
Both the lower court sentenced the defendant to pay 1 to 2 share the lack of wireless support 240,000 baht, with 7.5 percent interest per annum from the date of the violation until the payment is made. Which is equal to the co-pay each plaintiff cared for 120,000 baht plus interest. The value which the plaintiff Value cremate two togetherValue cremate both the lower court for Both defendants liable for 66,800 baht and 7.5 percent interest per year from the date of the violation. Although indebted to the plaintiff, both a right to participate can not be separated owe the plaintiff's individual, but when combined with the lack of wireless support the rights of the plaintiff, each not exceeding 200,000 baht funds to settlement for the defendant to one. 2, with each person in the plaintiff class is not more than 200,000 petition to prohibit the petition in fact Civil Code Procedure Section 248, paragraph one
The two defendants did not make a fight in which both the plaintiff received compensation from insurance companies. Then an issue since the defendant in a civil court even if the second layer will attest, it is considered a non-attest to the forbidden or approved by Civil Code Procedure considered is the fact that Section 87 does not raise the same admonition. ago by the likes of First Instance. And Court of Appeal Region 3 and not with problems concerning public order. Forbidden to petition under Section 249, paragraph one
Money to help the two defendants made a corpse for 10,000 baht to help the plaintiff Peongspo two parts according to humanitarian principles. The second defendant is not a help with the funeral and did not confess to deliver as part of compensation. But the merit in a manner in which the moral conscience. Therefore be offset against the amount the plaintiff Peongspo both claim not to sue.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 923/2549.
The lease agreement will be made and such rent as agreed, then. Would hold a lease. Room without prior notice. Defendant, a tenant is required to return the building to rent to the lessor of the plaintiff that the defendant refused to return the building to rent. A breach of the lease and the defendant also owned building leased to the plaintiff. Agree to act in violation of the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall be entitled to claim damages from both defendants for infringement and breach of contract based only on the base penalty claims breach of contract, then take the plaintiff can not exercise. Claims for infringement can. Because it damages the same case information.
Lease agreement, Room No. 10, Article 1, paragraph two indicate that When the lease maturity or terminated for any reason, "the lease" to deliver facilities leased back to the "lessor" immediately if the "tenant" can not deliver facilities leased back to the "lessor. "Lessee" agrees to pay the fine, "Lessor" 2000 baht a day after the due date until the date of delivery of delivery of the leased facilities back to the "lessor" already The agreement set forth in damages if the lessee did not breach of contract. Can deliver the building to rent back to the lessor immediately. The plaintiff has the right to damages under the lease, but the second paragraph of Article 1 of penalty is set too high section Courts have the power was reduced to a reasonable number of the Commercial Code, Section 383 has.
Lease agreement, Room No. 11, Article 8, paragraph two states that when a termination of the lease, then no matter if any "tenant" must move away from the rental immediately. If not, exit to allow for damages and fines amounting to 2,000 baht per day, "Lessor" every day until they move away. Specified conditions to allow damages only if the termination of the lease as the lease is different from building, Room No. 10, but even if the lease expires or terminated at the expiration of the lease not The conditions that the plaintiff will be entitled to claim breach of contract, the base rent. But plaintiffs also claim damages for infringement by the defendant which the plaintiff described. Attest to the prosecution and the number of damages caused by violations, then. The court has the power to determine damages appropriate to the circumstances and the severity of the Commercial Code, Section 438 violates the first paragraph.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3913/2548.
Both plaintiffs sued to force the two defendants jointly liable with the employer as a defendant, an employee who violated the plaintiff, both in the official employment. When the defendant to an action in violation of the plaintiff, both defendants two are also jointly liable with the defendant, one of the effects of abuse that the defendant, 3, a managing partner of the defendant to two, it must be jointly liable on all debts of the defendant to two by unlimited number of the Commercial Code, Section 1077 (2), 1087.
Determining the compensation shall be used solely by any such place. Be appropriate to the circumstances under the circumstances and the seriousness of the violation. While the incident that a plaintiff is 14 years old studying in grade 2, which would continue to operate career are as sober people. After the accident the plaintiff had symptoms of an unconscious cerebral edema. Skull collapsed. Bleeding under the scalp must be treated with surgery of the skull. Treatment may take a year longer. After surgery, then a plaintiff who remains in a brain does not recognize. Can not help themselves unable to say all the time to hire an administrator and does not appear to be able to keep a plaintiff who healed them. Now that a plaintiff can not help themselves like this. Would allow a plaintiff to lose the ability to follow the career of a completely plaintiff has been damaged. Regardless of whether they must be professional in any way that a plaintiff must suffer from the surgery and Thung disabilities can not help themselves throughout life. Both the lower court for damages to a plaintiff who lost the ability to work as a payment of $ 500,000 and other compensation for damage other than the monetary amount of $ 500,000 and appropriate.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2341/2548.
While the accident the boy Rs. Son of the plaintiff driving vehicles change the channel bus from the field bus 2, a channel bus 1, and away from the intersection about 30 meters, which is where the car will turn right to close the far right of the bus. as Road Traffic Act if the defendant, who ran in a channel on a bus to slow down the speed of the car to slow down like other vehicles, it is not an accident car crash. Motorcycles to ride in front. It can be stopped immediately. After the accident the defendant does not help that one. And does not represent a notification to the competent official. Which the circumstances of the offense and knew that he fled. Because collision is caused by the negligence of the defendant: 1.
The lack of benefit to the mother of the boy-Rs. Does not constitute a job during the monitored care boys Rs. Not damage the boy Rs. Should call in case people do abuse the boy Rs. The boys Rs. Has been. injury to body or health under Commercial Code, Section 444, 445 and 446.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1409/2548.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 443 paragraph three of the violations that led him to death if the person liable to be no lack of specific support that the deceased is responsible for legal support, but Section 1563 and Section 1564 provided for the children and parents must support each other raising the children and parents by means legitimate only There are no provisions define the rights and obligations to support parents need child illegitimate child illegitimate father, so even certified as eligible The Dharma heir legacy of his father. But I do not claim the dependent care from parents. Has no right to take legal action without support from the lack of violations.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6303/2547.
A. the boy must be disabled. Can not walk normally, and excretion. A. have held that the boy has lost the ability of future work in progress and destruction of life that can not be damaged by the occupation, it is normal. Damage that can not be entirely the work of present and future time when the defendant's violation of the first boy to be handicapped for life a.. The two plaintiffs damages for the loss of the ability to work as Commercial Code, Section 444, paragraph one, and disability that occurs also in case of damage to your beloved. Suffering both physically and mentally a very serious boy is born with g, while only 6 years old, both the plaintiff has no right to claim damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 446 money with damages. does not overlap and do not damage the same.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2110/2547.
Car of the plaintiff was the defendant, one who is an employee of the defendant to two violations, the official employment on February 26, 2539, Governor of Khon Kaen province has ordered a Board Investigations into the liability in civil later, on July 12. Investigation Committee for 2539 male civil liability to a report of investigation submitted to the Governor of Khon Kaen province that Two defendants are responsible for all civil. The Deputy Governor of Khon Kaen province, Acting. The governor of Khon Kaen acknowledge on July 13, 2539 Later, Khon Kaen province to investigate a report of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health The Acting Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Health Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Health signed. Acknowledged on October 7, 2539 it held that the plaintiff was aware of abuse and should be aware of the need to use Loss on October 7, 2539 plaintiff filed the case on August 4, 2540 does not terminate the plaintiff sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5128/2546.
Money that the plaintiff received from the Social Security Office is the compensation that the plaintiff should be entitled to the conditions and rules of the Compensation Act 2537 Section 18 is not compensation for violations. The plaintiff has no right to claim lack of support under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 443 paragraph three, the defendant can not be taken for compensation to the plaintiff should be entitled to such exemption for the lack of wireless support is.
The lack of wireless support is a debt arising from a data breach that has occurred from the time a violation is not aimed at debt in the future. And the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 206 accounts in default shall be deemed to violate the time to do. The plaintiff shall be entitled to charge interest rates of 7.5 percent per year, the lack of wireless support, a debt default one in the first paragraph of section 224.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5751/2544.
The State Railway of Thailand can not send a defendant to 9, both the plaintiff and other passengers on the train to derail it in front of the nine defendants duty is to provide other transportation vehicles, both the plaintiff and other passengers to give up. Destination, which of the passenger under the Civil and Commercial Code Section 608609 and the Act of State Railway of Thailand, the Section 9 (7) unloading passengers of the defendant, 3, 5 and 8 of the train of the defendant at 9 it appears to the plaintiff whole. Second and third parties that back and forth between the train station to the station L c. it is done instead of the defendant. 9 9 Nitiseampoanht between the defendant and the defendant to 3 to 5 and 8 are in position and the agent under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 797.
Non-monetary damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 446 means that the damage can not calculate the amount of such damage, but this might be the result. Stemmed from the need to remedy the violations, or replace the damage as well, which may have damaged more than damage to the body as well. Non-monetary losses such as Pain suffering the medical disability or disabilities to continue. Damage such as this that the court has legal authority to determine the circumstances and the bad. Strength of the violation. Losses due to non-monetary damages would be equivalent to attest how the amount is not in the body. Considering the nature of how wound healing, which have a bearing on the surgery and plaster cast multiple times. Have been treated for a long time in 3 years suffer the pain of the wound during treatment, which is a long time. Moreover, the left arm of the state that a plaintiff must be disabled for life and free personality as a result of surgery to the arm. Shorter than the left-right-hand man Treated as a non-monetary damages to the plaintiff. 1 would like to claim.
Plaintiff 2, to leave work to take care of the plaintiff at one with all that I need to earn money as expenses for medical treatment, Plaintiff 1, as well as the livelihood of the plaintiff that a round during the proceedings till the last for a long time. In addition, more than 10 years in the case of a violation of the plaintiff to claim interest from the date of such violation in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 206, but the plaintiffs did not claim an interest prior to filing with The lower court determined that both defendants pay interest at a rate of 9 percent per year, 15 of damages under the Civil Procedure Code, Section 142 (6) is well
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2046/2541.
In determining compensation for the violation shall be used solely by any such place. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 438, first paragraph, the court may order appropriate to the circumstances and The seriousness of the violation. When people across the damaged bridge. The car that the defendant was driving hit a bend in a joint bid documents and the only bridge repair that costs up to 364,800 baht, a large percentage of the forklift truck into the bridge. And up, and the wood for a scaffold supporting the bridge. Repair of the bridge point to be edited and changed. Structural steel for new money only 56,560 baht, however, plaintiff did not repair the bridge. Because the plaintiff has improved highways and the area is a 10 lane bridge has been demolished to. Assigned to the defendant used the plaintiff damages of 70,000 baht is appropriate.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3668/2540.
Ministry of Interior to order the plaintiff's release from a government order under the Civil Service Act BE 2495, Section 103 of the Civil Service Act BE 2485 Section 60 (2) and 62 administrative order is not a legal act. According to the Civil and Commercial Code. Need to adjust the timing of administrative cases. When the Civil Service Act has no deadline to sue to bring the case to the Court for the revocation of such order. Compared needed a law that is very similar characteristics violations under the Civil and Commercial Code Article 4, paragraph two of Article 448, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2751/2540.
Compensation for such violations. Return the property to pay the victim to abuse or use assets because it As well as the damages should be forced to use for any damage which has sparked up the meaning of section 438 with the second paragraph of the Commercial Code, so the lack of benefits derived from the rent it is considered. damages should one be forced to use to create more damage to itself. If the plaintiff's possession of a vehicle utilizing the dispute itself that a plaintiff shall be entitled to claim this section with When the plaintiff that a grant of possession use in the car dispute the plaintiff the 2 to make violation of the defendant has affected the rights of the plaintiff the 2 direct the plaintiff to 2, so shall be entitled to damages because of lack of benefit derived from the rent. the same like the one plaintiff without the plaintiff must have a second bond or equity in any one that is liable to a plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4109/2539.
The defendant, 2 the truck to park near the train even in the parking lot of the Port Authority of ordinary prudence would be expected that the train ride down the rails should have the freedom from obstructions enough. not appropriate to prevent the accident slick road traffic collision Act Wed. Since 2522, Section 57 (8) states that it is prohibited to park vehicles away from the rail, less than 15 meters, but the second defendant did not perform under that law, which enacted to protect others when the accused 2, the car to park in the accident, whether as a phase 2 meters or 1 meter, it is a violation of law that the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 422 to assume that the defendant 2. is the wrong defendant, two are in violation of the plaintiff and are subject to informal hiring defendant first must be jointly liable as an employer under Section 425 of the help. drive train with a speed of about 15 miles per hour when passing a curve see the parking area of a truck, several cars parked car near the defendant to two rail cars, but rather than help. Constant drive train with a speed same on closer in approximately 10 meters that can not drive past without incident grab collision, on the whistling danger with braking emergency, but could not stop the train on time in the state so Chor. Would be expected that people might grab the truck parked wrong train driving through the curve since then and that helps. Drive train speeds unchanged until the period which can not be stopped prior to the accident was considered help. The negligence by one, but the defendant, 2 the car to the park is not in a way that barrier rail clearly expect them to help. Need to take steps to stop the vehicle from surely will not see because the train runs along the rails, a force is the duty of leaders to park trucks will have to be careful over the negligence of the section. There are only two minor defendants are accused of negligence over the two to two-thirds of the liability for damages.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6905/2538.
According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 445 and Section 1567 shows that if parents or Mothers who have given the guardianship of children to work duties to one. Household and any person to appear on child abuse, which is bound by law Will have to work for their parents until the death of a violation shall pay the value. Claims is the lack of labor in the household must provide parents with the lack of labor. And filed with the lack of a labor action that does not mean the lack of free support calls. Section 443, paragraph three While the dead are still alive, the plaintiff, both parents dead people. Death that allows operation of the company. The plaintiff has established both the plaintiff and all. Second, it is authorized to act on behalf of the company but that company. As a separate entity to the deceased allows operation of the company that. Assumes that the operation of the plaintiff's death, helped both by the dead, and when not to. The plaintiff's death, both have to hire outsiders to work on behalf of death is hired. Work for the company that. If a case of lack of labor to Wor. Is the person who must find the right workers lack both the plaintiff did not sue the plaintiff has no power either. A lack of workers from the defendant.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5515/2538.
Movable ruler at the time was right to violate the settlement claims. From a breach by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 441 shall have the right to make a compromise agreement on the bill are made. Silk replacement as well. The defendant negligent driving by people driving cars Sat, had a compromise agreement between the defendant with a Sat in that contract would be enforceable. Mae. Is not the owner of the vehicle driver and shall make claims that each Parties take over, then the suspension under Section 852 plaintiff, a car insurer that S. Drive, which has been repairing cars is not subrogation. Requested by the accused.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6383/2537.
His wife has the right to take legal action for compensation from the other female identity and disclose to that They have sexual relations with her husband in the melody. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1521, paragraph two of compensation for damages as one means, including damage to the name. The sound of his wife and blessing. It was prescribed to them by the particular liability. Will take legal action for compensation by claiming a violation of rights under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 420 and Section 447 shall be paid compensation on a monthly basis. From the date of filing until the termination identity and cease to have similar sexual relationship with her husband not another.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4735/2534.
Representatives of the penalty the defendant ordered the plaintiff, both by the report of the Committee. Also held that the plaintiff did not know who should be liable for the claim. Later, the Investigation Committee for Civil Liability Report to the plaintiff's behalf by a hierarchy. Representative plaintiff acknowledged on November 18, 2523 is considered that the plaintiff should be aware of the need to use the compensation from that date. The plaintiff filed the case on November 3, 2524 does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3669/2531.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendants filed Lecture 1 to 3, functions as deliberate non-compliance convention Not supervise the receipt and sending money to the defendant as a result of 4 misappropriation of funds and allows the plaintiff to sue the plaintiff damages based on the data breach and the plaintiff shall be entitled to claim a impeachable The plaintiff sued the defendant to 1 to 3, the violation of general information. Data are not violated, which violate a criminal penalty. Is a 1 year old Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, first paragraph, which begins after the age. From the date of the injured student to abuse and should be aware of the need and the compensation in case of a juristic person injured shall be the date on which representatives of corporations know this. The plaintiff is under a boom Sanitation Sheriff Kumphawapi chaired by the position that a defendant when the accident as the Chief District Officer Kumphawapi notice that ordered the defendant to the criminal defendant to a four and the second was to surrender on the same day. Notice of such non-notification of the defendants 1, a representative of the plaintiff and defendant, a constituent accused, it would be deemed aware of who is liable, the other is not still considered not as a representative plaintiff knew of the infringement. and know who is liable to a prescription from the date that the plaintiff must be deemed aware of persons liable for violations related to the defendant on the new sheriff Kumphawapi note from the report of the committee responsible for civil investigations related. fraud exists. When the plaintiff sued to no more than one year does not terminate the case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2258/2527.
The three accused persons of Transportation Bus. Rented a car of the defendant to 2 to use the bus passengers of their by the defendant, one who is an employee of the defendant, 2 the drivers are considered to be the defendant, an agent of the defendant to 3 on the defendant to a drive passenger cars. negligently hit the plaintiff was injured the defendant, 3 have jointly liable for the consequences of violations, the defendant, one with even the employer of the plaintiff would be out of medical expenses to the plaintiff to then find the defendant, a person who commits violation. plaintiff's termination liability to pay medical expenses not plaintiff has a right to sue for medical expenses from all three defendants.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 56/2527.
Filing a claim for abuse caused by negligence in the civil case. Unlike a lawsuit to punish the defendant for the base offense criminal negligence that the plaintiff would have to describe all the actions the defendant claims to have done exactly the wrong for civil cases. When the plaintiff sued description shows that the violation of a violation is committed intentionally or negligently, it is enough to understand that living is the main pretext of what the plaintiff alleged.
Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant, a truck driver trawl boats than required by law, and with negligence in the absence of careful driving. The result was carried away on a trawl boat hit by a car telephone and telephone poles have been damaged the plaintiff. This shows clearly that the claim is based on the principle of the plaintiff's charges then.
The Supreme Court 1731 - 1732/2526.
Of the collision because the driver's negligence, the plaintiff and the defendants are together. And no less than each other. Damages is to fold together.
The liability of the defendant, an employee is accused of two payments which can not be separated. When the defendant second employer not liable. Justice of the Supreme Court would give effect to a defendant, except by petition.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1229/2517.
Filing a claim for abuse caused by negligence in the civil case. Unlike a lawsuit to punish the defendant for the base offense criminal negligence. The plaintiff must sue to describe all the actions the defendant claims to have done wrong, as clearly defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158 for a civil case. When the plaintiff sued description shows that the violation of a violation is committed intentionally or negligently. Is enough to be understood that the claims based primarily charged with the plaintiff's how
The plaintiff sued the lecture. With the absence of negligence in the care of the driver driving the car registration number. E.b. 03951 3 and the defendant's network. Employee driving a vehicle registration number. C 0.00331 defendants 1, 2, causing the car two cars collided. Because of these collisions cause the containers of beer and soda bottles, which carried on the truck, vehicle registration number 00331 August fell on the plaintiff's car drive up and explode. Cause serious injury, the plaintiff has shown by clear, which is mainly based claims of the plaintiff's charges under the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 172.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1204/2517.
Filing a claim for abuse caused by the negligence of other civil action to punish the defendant for the base offense by criminal negligence. The plaintiff must describe all the action claiming the defendant was clearly guilty under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158, describes for the civil lawsuit when the plaintiff shows that a violation of a breach is committed intentionally or negligently. Is enough to understand that. Claims based primarily on the charges of what the plaintiff.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Lorry driver Mr Move a registration number. C. 00331, which carried the beer and soda. Slick was driving collided with a car registration number 03951 E.b. why are beer and soda spill fall from car Was a 5252 vehicle registration number U.d. insured with the plaintiff's damages. Why grab a car collision occurred because of the negligence of the driver and vehicle registration number 00221 Aug motorists E.b. registration number is 03951 as shown by clear which claims to live by the principle of the plaintiff's charges. Code of Civil Procedure and Section 172.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2010/2515.
Prosecution of a defendant, which took back the property of the plaintiff by the breach is not subject to prescription under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448.
Claims for damages from the defendant took the ground that the seizure documents and check from the plaintiff. (And then refused to return and terminate the case. And all rights to receive money from the bank) that the plaintiff has the right to demand compensation for damages when violations occur. Must be the age, the date of damage to the plaintiff. Not know the date of offense And should know who will need compensation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1016/2497.
Compensation for the violation. The court may require appropriate to the circumstances and the case May be calculated according to the court that the defendant received benefit from the violation. Without any charges.
