Termination of the contract agency

Section 826 of the agency would suspend the withdrawal of the agent. Or terminate an agent.
The agency will hold an end to the contract. When either party is dead Or become incompetent or bankrupt, unless it appears that contrary to the terms or conditions of the entity.

Section 827 would remove the agent. And an agent will be terminated at any time.
Agents to withdraw or terminate the party which represents the time of the inconveniences to the other party. Party shall be liable for any damage caused, but that Except in the case of a necessity which is not bad to violate it.

Section 828 on the end because the agency suspended the death. The inability or failure to constitute it. That the agent you have to manage everything reasonable to preserve their benefits until he was assigned to the heirs or their representatives to preserve the benefits that they may have.

Section 829 on the agent, suspending agent, an end to the death. Agents become incompetent or bankrupt it. He is the heir or the estate agent responsible by law to notify the old and managed to preserve its interests as appropriate to the circumstances. Until the benefits that may preserve them.

Section 830 is that the agreement represented an end to the suspension, but the agent was given. You shall not raise as a defense to the other party. Until you notice that a party to it. Or until the next party will be informed.

Section 831 of the suspension of the contract to the agent. You shall not raise as a defense to any person who in good faith. If you do not know except outsiders because of their negligence.

Section 832 of the agent when the contract is terminated to an end. I prefer to be called to surrender to any power of attorney is given to the agent.

Supreme Court in 6121/2550.
Prior to the appointment of Supreme Court orders to prosecute a homeless person in the defendant's testimony that a defendant's attorney stated to the Court that a defendant in a death already. In such a case. Court must make clear that the fact that a defendant's death or not. If it is true, it is considered that a defendant's death pending the Supreme Court. Court is required to have a party instead of a defendant under section 42 P.wi.p. before the Supreme Court read the instructions above without the implementation of the provisions. Such proceedings, it is wrong and that the regulations under Section 27 Civil Procedure Code lawyer a defendant does not take any action to request the revocation proceedings, such an order within eight days. know the rules. He filed a request for extension of time to pay court fees and was put to the court. The Supreme Court ordered the defendant to replace the one that's not the actions of the defendant as a principal, not because such action litigation to preserve the benefits of compliance with Section 828, however. the action is a result of the defendant, the damaged party is entitled to raise an objection on the regulations. Such later date as mentioned in Section 27 paragraph two
Civil Procedure Code. when the defendant has no right to request an extension of time to pay fees to the defendant's petition for a court order to extend the period. deposit in accordance with it. And subsequently ordered the case because the defendant's petition because it does not take a Tiggฟgag place within the civil court fees. Allowed to extend it. It is not like the proceedings. The Supreme Court agreed to withdraw the regulation, such proceedings to the Court. The proceedings properly.

Supreme Court in 2071 - 2074/2550.
The parties shall appoint a lawyer to practice and proceedings on their behalf by an agent under the Civil and Commercial Code
Civil Procedure Code Section 60 of the 15 agents. Although the agent will be extinguished when she died. Mr. Barker also has the power and duty to preserve the benefits management process. The singing continues until the successor or representative of the petitioner would be to preserve the results. Demanded by the interests of the parties to the petitioner's death under Section 42 Civil Procedure Code.

Barker died on November 30, 2546 while the case is under consideration by the Court of Appeal. The heirs or the estate trustee or guardian of the petitioner may be requested. The parties to the petitioner to preserve the benefits of the litigation of the claim within one year from the date of his death by
Civil Procedure Code. Section 42, there is no request from the petitioner as a party. such provisions. The claimant submitted the case. Court of Appeal has ordered the case removed from the directory. Court of Appeals read the instructions and listen to the parties on December 19, 2548 is regarded as an agent or attorney Lewgpgn time she will be under Section 828 and said she has no power. The petitioner further proceedings.

Supreme Court to 789/2550.
May appoint a lawyer admitted to the second defendant and the defendant, the two proceedings under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 60 of the agency under the Civil and Commercial agents, even the 15 with which the second defendant to death. As a result, the agency will cease to be appealed before the Sun, but Sun still has the power and duty to preserve the defendant's actions and the second to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 828 unless the heir or representative of the defendant. The second is to protect the interests of lawyers for the defendants 2 to put an end to death when two defendants did not Wed, therefore, authorized the attorney representing the defendant on appeal, the defendant No. 2 2.

Supreme Court in 2203/2547.
Relationship between the defendant and was the director of the provisions of Section 1167 to enforce the provisions of this Code, so that the agency was resigned as directors of the defendant as a result. with termination. Representation would be terminated at any time. And shall be effective immediately upon the intent of the defendant as provided in Section 826, 827 are so effective when the defendant has been registered. As for the appointment or removal of directors shall be made by the general meeting. And appointment of Directors to be brought under Section 1151 and 1157 only to resign if the Board does not enforce the law. When it appears that the plaintiff's employment was terminated for a period after the resignation of the defendant at the defendant, then the President shall vacate office. It has no authority to act on behalf of the defendant. Is not that the defendant terminated plaintiff's employment. Plaintiffs are not entitled to receive any payment due to termination of employment.

Supreme Court in 3297/2547.
This case had died within the period of court. The defendant's lawyer will have the power and duty to preserve the benefits of management actions. Defendant to comply with Section 828 until the defendant's heirs or representatives will be added to protect the interests of the defendant's attorney. The defendant authorized the plaintiff or defendant. It appears to the court that the defendant had passed away on January 15, 2546, when the maturity of one year from the date of the court that the defendant is not death. Is there any application to become a party defendant. Without apparent reason why. The case must be removed from the directory under section 42
Civil Procedure Code.

Supreme Court in 1947/2545.
The second defendant, the plaintiff is the distributor of the plaintiff by the defendant No. 2 is the contact for the customer. When a customer order. Court will order the defendant to two customers. Both defendants will be returned to the plaintiff to deliver to our customers at any one time. Plaintiff has notified its customers on letters of credit to pay the price for both the defendant and the defendant ship, then it will bill under letter of credit. The customer turned out that customers did not order and with the settlement. Product directly to the plaintiff. Products sold to the plaintiff that the defendant is either sold to customers. The defendant and the plaintiff pay 3 percent to 7 percent of the number of products that customers purchase. Plaintiff did not sell two of the defendants on behalf of the defendant's own agent was not both. However, the defendant and the plaintiff is a representative product in the Republic. China and Hong Kong and the plaintiff agreed to it. Are characteristics of the agents under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 797 of the binding between the plaintiff and the defendant both in the absence of agreement between them. Otherwise, they fall in the Civil and Commercial Code. The agent Both as a defendant, the plaintiff shall be entitled to withdraw from representing a loss on. Any of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 827, first paragraph, so that the two defendants to the plaintiff to terminate the contract by the plaintiff is a representative one. Next there are the legal rights and have legal effect immediately. Not deemed to be exercised in bad faith at all. Plaintiffs claim that defendants have no right to damages caused by the breach. Contract and damages resulting from the termination of the contract agent for the inconvenience. The plaintiff sued and the plaintiff does not attest to the fact described above. The defendant did not assume that both the plaintiff to withdraw from representation without. Notice of the withdrawal of the agent at the time, not under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 827, paragraph two.

Supreme Court in 7061/2539.
Plaintiff by October. Authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff attorney on October 1. To the 2534. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit on October 13, 2535 Dec. But the plaintiff was dismissed from the position of Director at the February 9, 2536. The prosecution was represented by attorney, the plaintiff does not appear that the plaintiff has withdrawn the book. Such authority as the representative plaintiff is appointed. The prosecution, represented by Power of Attorney shall remain binding, and the plaintiff. Under the law can be suspended due to the end of October. Out of the director. Because the plaintiff does not affect only that path. No authority to act on behalf of the plaintiff from the date of October 13, 2535, only one company. Has been done to determine whether there is prejudice. It has the power to prosecute the plaintiff under such power of attorney, power of attorney. The end result to be obtained before filing it.

Supreme Court in 5699/2539.
Contract dispute, the plaintiff and the defense made it. The plaintiff was assigned to the defense agency to negotiate a land lease. A. The building on the negotiations succeed and the defendant has completed the construction of defense to the plaintiff and leased buildings constructed in the Department of Conservation is not binding in the contract. The defense is not so, the agent will terminate the contract at any time to do it. Unless it is terminated at a time inconvenient to the plaintiff. The defendant will be liable to the plaintiff for damage to occur, but in accordance with Section 827.

Supreme Court in 6409/2538.
The defendant will just give up. Into the defendant's attorney in the Appeals Court said the defendant did not know. I do not want to. Lawyer before the lawyer of the defendant to withdraw a request to. From the defendant's lawyer was. It is also the lawyer of the defendant and the requested extension of time to appeal.

Supreme Court to 514/2538.
1 and 2, while the defendants filed a petition in the Court of First Instance ordered the lawyer to withdraw the appeal. Case to the Court of Appeal and the case is pending with the Court of Appeal. The Appeal Court has no power to request an application. 1st and 2nd defendants to appoint an attorney to practice and proceedings on their behalf. An agency under the Civil and Commercial Code by the 15 representatives. Section 797 and shall be entitled to withdraw, the lawyer representing the process at any time. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 827, paragraph one of the lawyers like to do damage. The admonition to the parties that he is the attorney under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 827, paragraph two, the defendant filed a petition to withdraw as counsel for a defendant who was a registrar. The withdrawal of a partner company from the register of shareholders that the Company may be terminated. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1249 stipulates that it is still considered to be located. As long as the time needed to complete the liquidation of the defendant, 2 and 6, as the director. Authorized to act on behalf of the defendant that there is a liquidator and the like. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1251.1252, with authority. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1259, as long as you do not have to pay the defendant's account that one up. New defendant No. 1 and No. 6 as the liquidator shall have the power to withdraw the petition said. The first was the defendant.

Supreme Court in 5241/2537.
The parties shall appoint a lawyer to practice and proceedings of the. Code of Civil Procedure, Section 60 is an agency under the Civil and Commercial Code, the 15's when the plaintiff is a representative of the deceased. The agency shall have the power to suspend the plaintiff's attorneys, and manages to cover the proceedings. Interests of the plaintiff to put under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 828 unless the heirs or representatives of the plaintiff would be to preserve the benefit of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's lawyer has put an end to death when the plaintiff did not. Plaintiff attorneys have signed a petition of the plaintiff. But at the end of one year from the date that appears to the court that the plaintiff's death. No one can apply to become a party plaintiff. The case was removed from the directory of the Supreme Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 42.

Supreme Court to 356/2537.
Defendant No. 2 died while the case is still under consideration by the Court of Appeal Region 2, no one requested the parties to the case where two people dying within one year from the date of the defendant's second death, until the pronouncement Appeal Region 2. The pair then regarded as Lewgpgn time an agent or lawyer accused the two will be prosecuted to preserve the benefit of the defendants 2 under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 828, then said defendant No. 2 has no power to prosecute for longer. The defendant's attorney filed a second petition after the end of it. The second petition of the defendant was not lawful.

Supreme Court in 4953/2536.
Regulations of the plaintiff and the board is S. Authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff. By two-thirds of people signed and sealed, we are bound together. But to the plaintiff. MP has resigned from the Board authorized the plaintiff also was signed to the channel name. The attorney for the prosecution. Act without authority. Attorney under power of attorney has no authority to prosecute the plaintiff. Relationship between the plaintiff's company. Sat by the Director. Civil and Commercial Code Section 1167 requires that the agency will enforce the provisions of MP would terminate his representation of the plaintiff to lose any time at any time. And shall be effective immediately upon the plaintiff to show intent. As provided in section 826,827,386 effective when the plaintiff has a right to share the Registration Office. The company did not. The force under Section 1023 is a case where the plaintiff is deemed to benefit the third party has not changed. Until it has been published in the Royal Gazette. The defendant, a third party would not take advantage of that.

Supreme Court in 4514/2531.
No one shall be exercised through the court under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 55 only when the law prescribes that in case of need apply to the Court. To ensure the protection of their rights are. The petitioner filed a petition to the court to withdraw his mother from the absence of a law granting the petitioner in the court to require the petitioner is not entitled to file a complaint.

Supreme Court to 963/2493.
Instead, after serving as an agent. Must deliver the property to be returned to the care of their children altogether. Property which the agent continues to take possession of it. Not returned by the body to do it. Agent is claimed to be possessed by the adversary to remove their waste is not. To take possession of it is still considered the principal and the other occupied by the division when that agency has no authority to remove property that they already share. The others are occupied. This fall, as occupiers instead of the same agent. The claim of possession to the non-lean. Until you notice the change of possession. Civil and Commercial Code and Section 1381.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More