Section 797 of the agent contract. The contract, which allows a person called an agent. Authority on behalf of another person. Called for. The agreement will like it.
It is the expression of its agents, it is clear or tacit round.
Section 798 meters in any business you are forced by law to be made in writing. The agency is a business which need to be made in writing by
Whatever business you are forced to require evidence in writing. The representatives for the business which they have written with
Section 799 is the one to represent Incapacitated person. You know the ones that would be binding on the parties represented.
Section 800 but only if the agent is authorized. You have to be built, but only what is necessary. He was assigned the mission to which they are truly spectacular.
Section 801 If an agent is authorized by generally. You could do any business in a deal that would have to do everything.
However, as will be discussed below. You do not know what it is.
(1) sell real estate or mortgages.
(2) Real Estate for over three years.
(3) donate.
(4) compromise.
(5) filed with the court.
(6) the dispute to arbitration.
Section 802 in an emergency. The need to prevent corruption. You shall be presumed that the agent will perform any such act will be Reply Post Reply. It would have to be there.
Section 803 agents have no right to receive pension Unless they have agreed in the contract that the pension Or conduct between the parties is whether the pension The tradition has been a bonus.
Section 804 if the promise of a single agent for many of the same gem. You shall be presumed that the agent will be people that do not separate.
Section 805 does not represent the consent of the will to do any legal act on behalf of the self on its own behalf or on behalf of a third party can not. Unless there are specific legal settlements.
Section 806 itself, which did not disclose their names will appear and take any contract that the agent had made on their behalf. But if one has to allow their representatives to the next is a gem. You will find that the person may be detrimental to the rights of third parties in which he has for the agent. He has worked as an agent, but before that it was not.
Supreme Court to 562/2553.
The defendant entered into the construction of the highway. The defendant will be under contract is subcontract.The defendant is the company B to cause damage to the plaintiff. The defendant is liable to the plaintiff as a principal under Section 427.
Supreme Court in 6829/2551.
The first defendant and the plaintiff entered into a loan agreement, mortgage, land and building as security for such debt by the end of the mortgage agreement that If the plaintiff the mortgage money to pay the defendant a permit shall pay the deficiency until the defendant 2 is the wife by the law of the defendant that a consent to the defendant that a contract to recover the funds. The loans are made aware that the defendant has caused an increase in debt and have ratified it. Debt it owes the husband and wife as joint debtors under Section 1490 (4) The defendant's second wife to a husband with the defendant to the plaintiff liable to pay such debts as well.
Section 728 states just that. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable as defined in the notice. Not provided that notification shall be made in writing by providing the mortgage. The lawyer told the mortgage so they do not need to be made under section 798 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 3799/2551.
She owned the disputed land and the building by the defendant is the holder. Ownership of the petitioner. The defendant shall be a representative of the petitioner and the petitioner in a position which is in. Be anonymous. The defendant, whose name is the ownership of land and land disputes. To be mortgaged to the plaintiff. It allows a defendant who was representing his or her conduct was in the front. Land disputes. Barker did not cause prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff, a third party there. The defendant is represented. The plaintiff has worked, but the fact that the defendant is represented by Section 806 of the land dispute is binding on the petitioner. Whether she is aware of the mortgaged or not.
Supreme Court in 7354/2551.
The plaintiff's attorney, power of attorney document to the District 2 B act as specified by Article 15 of the 15 states that "the business stated in the letter of attorney to the attorney to delegate to. Bank official who is authorized to act on the behalf. But the delegate, as this will be a special one as it is authorized to act on behalf of or in operations in the power of the one does not "like the attorney to delegate to officers of acting on behalf of the plaintiff. However, a separate one. Are authorized to act on behalf of many of the other. Or act as an unlimited number of times not. Power of Attorney is a document labeled B District 3 appointee ... I would like to delegate and / or implemented in May ... the following activities with the Bank and ERA for the benefit of Bangkok Metropolitan Bank (Thailand) to finish No. 1 for the debt. .. Article 2 has the power to prosecute civil and issue notices and demands. Civil litigation and other litigation related to the completion of the receipt and documents of the Court Article 3 shall have the power to conduct such criminal complaint or police report accusing the ... etc.. As can be seen that the power to appoint such an attorney. The lawsuit is a civil action on behalf of several criminal complaint against the defendant in a criminal case against the two, regardless of whether the case is about. Nothing in particular. Therefore, the attorney general to sue the defendant's attorney during the two civil cases. And criminal matters without being limited to any civil or criminal action only. Any subject matter alone.2 appointee has no authority over the prosecution of this defendant. Plaintiffs have no authority to prosecute this
Supreme Court in 3497/2551.
Plaintiff to the defendant as a land agent. The plaintiff sued the defendant and forced to return money to redeem the mortgaged to the plaintiff. It is an indictment of the defendant, who represents the return of property under Section 810, even without proof of authority as they claim, the court was not contrary to Section 798 paragraph two.
According to the plaintiff's witnesses to demonstrate that the defendant is true. The plaintiff is the mortgagee to attest to a part as well. It need not have a book to reveal the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant was not attest for the changes in the land contract is not prohibited by P.wi.p. with Section 94 (b).
The plaintiff sued the defendant in a criminal case against a co-commission of the fraud. Sukhumvit district court judge reasoned that the circumstances of the dismissal by a reasonable doubt that defendant Mortgage of the plaintiff or not. To the benefit of the doubt to the defendant. The court dismissed the reason she did not get a mortgage, instead of the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit to force the defendant to redeem the mortgage payment to the plaintiff. The claim does not rely on the criminal misappropriation of guilty. Is not associated with criminal cases would apply not P.wi.a. Section 46.
Supreme Court in 2031/2551.
The objective of the business of the debtor's financial investment accounts as an agent. Must use caution and common ฝื hand as far as it takes. And should be required in the lender's money to invest, according to Section 807 and Section 659 paragraph two, paragraph three of the debtor and creditors to reduce the amount of bills issued by the Ministry and is certified. money orders payable to the University and its capital is invested by Sun for failure to comply with Aval confirmation of the debtor's investment policy. Committee of creditors that To invest in the bank accepted bill of exchange is an act by an agent. Without power or authority other than that of the delegation. The result was that the creditor can not collect money under the bill. The creditor has filed a bill from the payer's money and endorsements Aval. And has submitted an application for payment from the assets of the aval and court approval. The creditors have been paid. But it is not certain that the creditors are paid in full or not. The debtor's creditors have been causing the damage. The debtor is liable to pay compensation to the creditors.
Supreme Court in 1602/2551.
Legal and law enforcement to require evidence in writing. The agency must attest to the evidence as presented. The defendant can not be traced to the witness that the defendant signed a contract with the borrower. The defendant's loan. Hearing on the issue shall be cut or edit the text in the document as witnesses P.wi.p. Section 94 (b) an issue arises with the public order. Even though no party raised any law. The Supreme Court has ruled itself under Section 142 (5) of Section 246 and Section 247.
Supreme Court in 1690/2551.
Sat at a power of attorney to the pharmacist.'s Attorney during the time that Sun has not been authorized by the plaintiff to the lawsuit, instead, they find it is not. Get it right, according to the law will be void. The result was just that Saturday. To be filed by the plaintiff's attorney was made in that time. Only later, when the Sun is authorized by the plaintiff to the lawsuit, instead, it has not changed. The new power of attorney or power of attorney, so the result column. Have the power to appoint a lawyer, filing and prosecution of the plaintiff from the date authorized by the plaintiff, the Sat.
Section 801 paragraph (5) shall be the authorized representative of the general case where the authority. The lawsuit does not specify an agent to represent themselves, but in the power of attorney. The plaintiff said. Plaintiff's attorney to the attorney representing the plaintiff Sat. It shall have the power to sue and prosecute any person or entity. The act of causing damages to the plaintiff. Including the power to appoint a subagent The plaintiff's attorney representing the plaintiff has the power to direct the prosecution and not be stated specifically that a defendant sued or prosecuted against any person or any It is a lawful authority.
Supreme Court in 1333/2551.
Channel. Is to find the insured has a duty to persuade others to make insurance contracts. Living with the defendant. Not representative of the insurance coverage purchased by the defendant under the 2535 Act, Section 5 and Section 71 is not representative of the defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand. Knows or should know the actual text, while making sure the health certificate. .'ve disease, hepatitis, and many have dense due to alcohol treatment. Within the hospital. The defendant was aware of the fact that such a finding was not
Sun knows that it is not disclosed except for hepatitis, which may predispose to the actual text. The defendant denied the contract or would result in higher premiums for life insurance contract between the Sun and the defendant is void under Section 865 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 1657/2550.
Section 728 stipulates that "when the mortgage is. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor before ... "is not provided. Notice shall be in writing mortgages. Therefore, the plaintiff's attorney to the. Written notice of the mortgage, the defendant does not fall within the provisions of Section 798 paragraph one, given the agent must be in writing on that. A notice of the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant received the letter. I did not notice. Payment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's lawsuit. The plaintiff accepts that the notice provisions of the new mortgage. The notice of the plaintiff. Held that the plaintiff, which it ratified in accordance with Section 823 shall constitute notice to the plaintiff by the then mortgage.
Supreme Court in 4870/2550.
Petitioner filed a petition to release the seized property claims. A land dispute has been raised by the petitioner, the mother of the petitioner. But because her husband was an alien who is a defendant in a letter. The benefits of a land dispute on behalf of the singer. The defendant was not aware of the disputed land to the husband of the plaintiff in the case of a mortgage. Petitioner's request, such as if it is true it is that she is. Is the anonymity allows defendants who represent themselves to be out front. It is entitled to possession of land disputes. Defendants dispute the mortgage on the land to the husband of the plaintiff and the facts did not appear. The plaintiff's husband was aware of the claimant to the defendant. She has a husband might prejudice the rights of the plaintiff, a third party. That the defendant's agent and earned the right to know that before the defendant is. Representative of the petitioner has not Tamp.p.p. Section 806 plaintiff, as trustee of her husband shall have the right to sue to enforce the disputed land. The petitioner has no right to release the seized property.
Supreme Court in 5140/2550.
Sat directors authorized to sign and seal of the defendant, acting on behalf of the defendant, even Sun does not have the seal of the defendant. The book received a debt of the defendant at the top of the paper, the behavior of the Sun is considered as an agent of the defendant, the Sun Sun made the debt to the plaintiff. The acts of the defendant. Books have been part of that debt. "... We must reduce the price you have to be more appropriate. The waiver of the monthly payment of such devices to "any action, it is a doubt as to whether that Accept the claim. Recognize the debt, which makes life a stumbling halt. Starting date specified in the statute books since the debt to no more than two years against the plaintiff's claim did not terminate the.
Supreme Court in 2345/2550.
The plaintiff is an entity that occurred during the MP is that MP is authorized on behalf of the plaintiff was the sole director of the Legal Affairs Division, which is a lower-ranking officials aware of the plaintiff. Aware of the violations and will require compensation. Assumes that the plaintiff can not know it was not the authority on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's statement of the duties and responsibilities of the director and the law is only the scope of responsibilities of the departments within your organization. Only that the plaintiff was a notice of claim to the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff's practice. Duty by the place as usual. Not act on behalf of the plaintiff as the assignment in the form of a. The agency will hold the actions of the Governor, so it appears that the plaintiff was aware that MP's officers as proposed by the hierarchy and down. Signed authorization to prosecute the defendant on August 16, 2542 the plaintiff must be aware and conscious violation of a person liable on such date. When the plaintiff filed on August 4, 2543 to the expiration of one year under Section 448, first paragraph, the plaintiff did not terminate the lawsuit.
Supreme Court in 2071 - 2074/2550.
The parties shall appoint a lawyer to practice and proceedings on their behalf by an agent under the Civil and Commercial Code and Civil Procedure Code Section 60 of the 15 agents. Although the agent will be extinguished when she died. Mr. Barker also has the power and duty to preserve the benefits management process. The singing continues until the successor or representative of the petitioner would be to preserve the results. Demanded by the interests of the parties to the petitioner's death under Section 42 Civil Procedure Code .
Barker died on November 30, 2546 while the case is under consideration by the Court of Appeal. The heirs or the estate trustee or guardian of the petitioner may be requested. The parties to the petitioner to preserve the benefits of the litigation of the claim within one year from the date of his death by Civil Procedure Code Section 42, there is no request from the petitioner as a party. such provisions. The claimant submitted the case. Court of Appeal has ordered the case removed from the directory. Court of Appeals read the instructions and listen to the parties on December 19, 2548 is regarded as an agent or attorney Lewgpgn time she will be under Section 828 and said she has no power. The petitioner further proceedings.
Supreme Court in 3913/2549.
Attorney who was authorized to provide. New. Filed a lawsuit against the court to complete all of the appointee. Obtained a warrant Was. Objection filed the lawsuit, but any non-specific. Was. Is authorized to act on behalf of the filing and prosecution in court. All cases indefinitely until an authorized person to withdraw the authorization.
Supreme Court in 2761/2549.
The plaintiff is one which is authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff, the two received land from the defendant as collateral for a loan that she borrowed from the plaintiff's second action the plaintiff, 2 Although the letter mortgage named plaintiff. 1 is a mortgagee only. Without specifying whether acting on behalf of the plaintiff, the second is the plaintiff, 2 of which are anonymous person to appear and take the mortgage, the plaintiff who first made on their behalf, the plaintiff, the two are right. made under Section 806 and the case is not governed by Section 798, paragraph one of the agents to the mortgage contract must be in writing. Even so, the agent of the plaintiff's second mortgage to a contract with the defendant, the defendant is not a written law. But when the plaintiff's rights under the second mortgage is right that there is an option for anonymity in accordance with Section 806, the plaintiff then has the power to sue to force a second mortgage.
Supreme Court in 5900/2549.
Car hire from the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement signing ceremony in the car rental agreement. Have not been changed by a car. The fact that a defendant is assigned two to a car lease from the plaintiff. Is not an offer to contract hire. It does not have an attorney of the defendant.
Supreme Court in 3913/2549.
Attorney who was a delegate to the. Filed a lawsuit against the court until the completion of all the new appointee. The power of attorney to act on behalf of the filing and prosecution in court at all. The case for an indefinite time until the power to revoke the authorization.
Supreme Court in 2761/2549.
The plaintiff is one which is authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff, the two received land from the defendant as collateral for a loan that she borrowed from the plaintiff's second action the plaintiff, 2 Although the letter mortgage named plaintiff. 1 is a mortgagee only. Without specifying whether acting on behalf of the plaintiff, the second is the plaintiff, 2 of which are anonymous person to appear and take the mortgage, the plaintiff who first made on their behalf, the plaintiff, the two are right. made under Section 806 and the case is not governed by Section 798, paragraph one of the agents to the mortgage contract must be in writing. Even so, the agent of the plaintiff's second mortgage to a contract with the defendant, the defendant is not a written law. But when the plaintiff's rights under the second mortgage is right that there is an option for anonymity in accordance with Section 806, the plaintiff then has the power to sue to force a second mortgage.
Supreme Court in 3093/2549.
The District was authorized to request the return of the petitioner to the court proceedings until This is the most Including the right to appeal the court and is entitled to appoint an agent to perform. Replace as necessary any of its delegated authority to the district, the petition for a motorcycle in the middle of the night. In the second letter of authorization is specified only that the District Court for the filing of the night to get a motorcycle without a right to appeal to that court them. But considering the power of attorney and two together, I understand that I am authorized to have the right to legal proceedings until the case is finalized. It also includes the right to appeal or petition to appoint a lawyer. The appeal court as well.
Supreme Court in 7022/2548.
The representative must be appointed by the clear expression or indirectly by them to have. Power to comply with Section 797 of the Act does not appear that the plaintiff, defendant's appointed representative. The defendants testified that the defendant's agent or broker to sell a car to lease to third parties. The fact that an agreement made between the defendant and the defendant is merely an agreement to the defendant's possession of the vehicle at lease one of the defendants not only the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant to perform. The defendants offered to purchase the vehicle from the defendant that it is delivered as an agent of the defendant No. 1 in sales to third parties. And not on behalf of the plaintiff. Both defendants are liable for the disputed vehicle to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 1664/2548.
The plaintiff hired the defendant to two to come before the construction of commercial buildings. The second defendant, the defendant consented to a construction contract with plaintiff, defendant, a commercial building, it is implied that the second defendant's case is not the agent because the agent is not the desire. To be bound with third parties for the actions of agents.
Supreme Court in 2178/2548.
Plaintiff to the defendant as a land agent. The plaintiff sued the defendant and forced to change the name of the mortgagee is named as a plaintiff. The indictment called the defendant's property from an agency under Section 810 even though there is no evidence as to the legal action was not contrary to Section 798.
Supreme Court in 5196/2548.
Termination of a contract to buy and sell land in any case, no legal force. Must be in writing. The power to terminate the contract should not be made in writing as well. The plaintiff testified that in determining whether the plaintiff has been assigned a lawyer. The termination notice to the defendant. Intention of plaintiff to demonstrate that the actions of the lawyer to act. Plaintiffs in such cases. It held that the plaintiff had been ratified in accordance with Section 823 of the termination and the like.
Plaintiff a letter terminating the contract and termination of the plaintiff has completed. Even later, the defendant will have notice of transfer of title to land again, and the plaintiff. Land Office, pursuant to such appointment. It is just to give you the opportunity to transfer land to the defendant to the plaintiff. Was no longer a dispute. However, it appears that the defendant was in default again. Such circumstances that the plaintiff did not doubt that the defendant terminated the contract with it.
The contract between the parties, each party must return to the other party. As such, according to the existing Section 391, paragraph one, the defendant is obligated to return the money received and shall pay to the plaintiff. Interest to the plaintiff from the date on which the interest in such cases. This is not the default interest rate. The defendant's conduct is a breach of contract. The plaintiff has terminated the contract. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest. Although the purchase and sale agreement will not require that the plaintiff will be charged interest from the defendant. If the defendant's breach of contract or otherwise. However, the plaintiff shall be entitled to charge interest under section 391 paragraph two.
Supreme Court in 1470/2548.
Power of attorney, the attorney for the civil proceedings that the plaintiff's attorney to prosecute the contract on behalf of the plaintiff in a contract dispute, when a dispute concerning the rights of the plaintiff against any individual attorney. Instead, the plaintiff shall have the power to prosecute an entity designated by it. Must determine whether to prosecute the defendant again.
Supreme Court in 6550/2547.
Providing power to prosecute is not restricted by law to be authorized to sue anyone. Any particular case is the only The attorney has stated clearly that the plaintiff was authorized to. Authorized the prosecution of Mr. Sun, Mr. Sun has a different power to prosecute the plaintiff sued the defendants, including five of the debtor of the plaintiff in a case like this as well. The plaintiffs do not have a specific power of attorney to sue the other five defendants.
Supreme Court in 7626/2547.
Plaintiff is a representative of the defendant in borrowing from banks. The loan proceeds were donated to the defendant. Even as the loan is not evidenced in writing under Section 798, paragraph two, it has been in force between the agents. When the plaintiff was forced to repay the loan. The defendant must be liable to pay the principal and interest, the plaintiff must go back to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 15/2547.
The documents indicate that the plaintiff had a contract of carriage by sea is just. Shipping in the defendant's table 1 is derived from the second defendant to the plaintiff to bring to an informed decision whether to ship to. With the ship or not. Of lading, which is considered as evidence of the contract of carriage by sea is not our case 1 is the carrier, despite the company accused the two, however, accused the two states that have signed in the cargo hold as a carrier. In addition, the contract of carriage by sea, the carrier must be paid the freight, but the defendant paid a pension from the plaintiff is a representative of the difference of the freight. The defendant is first charged to the plaintiff, less the freight to the fact that one can advance the plaintiff to the defendant No. 2 on the freight on behalf of the carrier will be sent to the principal is. Carrier and Defendants 1 and 2 have been paid as a commission agent. It can not be said that a defendant is a carrier and two co-defendants transported the defendant to a defendant when the two are the only representatives of the maritime transportation of the plaintiff. The pension is paid. Yes, it is to find a carrier that paid the freight did not. Both defendants are not liable to pay costs and damages caused by that. Court order not to arrive on time.
Supreme Court to 10443/2546.
The defendant and the plaintiff to recover money from the plaintiff's attorney signed the form without restrictions. The defendant offered to take them. The agreement that if the plaintiff no reimbursement. The defendant used the documents to the transfer of the disputed land belongs to the defendant. The plaintiff was unable to repay the money to defendant and the defendant has been completed in Such power of attorney, then the transfer of disputed land to the defendant. Is agreed upon. The defendant has the authority to do so. Power of Attorney is not fraudulent documents. Legal disputes and the transfer of land to the defendant, is void.
Supreme Court in 1112/2546.
The court initially sentenced the defendant in this case, the debt payment of wages for construction. HMS Institute of Technology, the petitioner filed a petition management company f-tech school. A defendant who is not temporary. Unless the defendant will come back. The petitioner was appointed by the court to manage the affairs of the School of Education Technology. Shall have the meaning inherent in it. She has the power. Management of school affairs, but only in Education Technology. The court ordered the case to be either temporarily, as needed. To manage the assets of a defendant who is not in accordance with Section 48 paragraph one for cases where the court is the petitioner. Managing the assets of the defendant, who is under Section 48 paragraph two, which will allow the petitioner to have the same authority. Agent, attorney general, not even in an emergency, she could not violate it. Management in the business of the defendant. She has no power to apply to this case.
Supreme Court in 1398/2545.
I was doing a power of attorney to act on behalf of the petitioner and the Bank. The applicant shall have the power to get your car in a criminal case No. 1769/2542 of the black night, Narathiwat Provincial Court. Which shows that the petitioner was appointed to the grade and the Bank is authorized to act on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner's attorney that the attorney did not limit individual. Must be made jointly by the authorized attorney, so one can apply it in the middle of the night.
Supreme Court in 4446/2545.
The defendant's second possession of the car and offered to the plaintiff. Defendant both agreed that the ownership of the cars belonging to the defendant at 1 until the defendant to two to get paid for the car from the plaintiff and to pay for the car to the defendant a complete defense at first to be listed transferable. the plaintiff. Held that the defendant 1 is the anonymity and allow the defendant to two representatives at the front is that it owns or has the right to sell motor defendant 1 should be liable to the plaintiff, who in good faith. shall not prejudice its rights. From the agreement of the defendant No. 1 and 2 and the fact that one can not claim that the Court determines the defendant is a book out and ask to be informed of the agreement between the defendant and did so on the plaintiff to pay. the defendant's vehicle to complete the two defendants had a duty to the plaintiff and the defendant's car registration tax that has not received payment for a car of defendant No. 2 is not an excuse to refuse registration of transfer of title to plaintiff. The rights, duties and obligations between the agent as a defendant. Both are correct, I have another. With respect to the first defendant to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 1217/2545.
Attorney stated clearly that Co., Ltd. The plaintiff attorney to delegate at the Sun with the authority to litigate cases against the two accused to the court that the contract of guarantee if it is authorized to buy at any one Sat. litigation against the defendants both breach of contract and lease. Only insurance companies at the same company sued the defendant as an MP and one time only. What people have done a separate lawsuit against the other defendant or both parties. More than once, not even an MP is appointed a lawyer and at one time the plaintiff testified as a witness. It is evident that both parties be in the same business. It is the only person authorized to act on one or more persons. Which stamp duty is only 10 baht, according to rate of stamp duty, the provisions of Article 7 (a) When the plaintiff stamp duty on the attorney $ 30 to complete the provisions of Section 104 and the accounting rate of stamp duty, the provisions of Article 7 (a) the power of attorney. therefore be used as evidence in a case under the provisions of Section 118.
Supreme Court in 6728/2545.
Assigned to the plaintiff's counsel notice to the defendant by an assignment of mortgage does. The writing is not like the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 798, but had not received notice of the mortgage debt. The plaintiff brought a lawsuit was filed, the plaintiff accepted the notice of the mortgage and the ratification of the acts of the lawyer's lawyer. The lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the notice required under the Civil and Commercial Mortgages, Section 823.
A. as an assistant bank manager of the plaintiff. Are responsible for supervising the accounts receivable outstanding defaulted debt. And follow up calls for debt arrears. The plaintiff's witnesses testified about the defendant's liability and that there is indeed a testimony to what the witnesses are involved in and informed us. I testified as a witness. The testimony of. I do not have to listen to as the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 95 (2).
Supreme Court in 1052/2538.
Plaintiff to sign in Power of attorney by the defendant to enter into a letter of authorization to enter. Message that the plaintiff authorized the defendant is authorized to submit an application for registration of transfer. Land disputes are one of the plaintiff to the defendant by the plaintiff, but by acts. Transfer arising from the fraud is deemed void if not a legal transfer has occurred. Ownership of the disputed land still belongs to the plaintiff or the defendant to take second. Welcome to a land dispute from the defendant, the defendant is not entitled under 2. Legal mortgage, the plaintiff is entitled to. Cancel legal. The defendant a mortgage on the defendant 2.
Supreme Court in 1966/2526.
Even representatives of the defendants entered into an agreement to sell to the plaintiff, but the fact that I have. Representatives of the defendants entered into agreements on behalf of the defendant and the defendant's own agents. The plaintiff as a tool. Without the consent of the defendant as a principal. The defendant shall not be bound under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 805.
Supreme Court to 598/2506.
The land to her grandchildren. To do so, the legal authority to do so, even as he is a minor is not authorized.
It is the expression of its agents, it is clear or tacit round.
Section 798 meters in any business you are forced by law to be made in writing. The agency is a business which need to be made in writing by
Whatever business you are forced to require evidence in writing. The representatives for the business which they have written with
Section 799 is the one to represent Incapacitated person. You know the ones that would be binding on the parties represented.
Section 800 but only if the agent is authorized. You have to be built, but only what is necessary. He was assigned the mission to which they are truly spectacular.
Section 801 If an agent is authorized by generally. You could do any business in a deal that would have to do everything.
However, as will be discussed below. You do not know what it is.
(1) sell real estate or mortgages.
(2) Real Estate for over three years.
(3) donate.
(4) compromise.
(5) filed with the court.
(6) the dispute to arbitration.
Section 802 in an emergency. The need to prevent corruption. You shall be presumed that the agent will perform any such act will be Reply Post Reply. It would have to be there.
Section 803 agents have no right to receive pension Unless they have agreed in the contract that the pension Or conduct between the parties is whether the pension The tradition has been a bonus.
Section 804 if the promise of a single agent for many of the same gem. You shall be presumed that the agent will be people that do not separate.
Section 805 does not represent the consent of the will to do any legal act on behalf of the self on its own behalf or on behalf of a third party can not. Unless there are specific legal settlements.
Section 806 itself, which did not disclose their names will appear and take any contract that the agent had made on their behalf. But if one has to allow their representatives to the next is a gem. You will find that the person may be detrimental to the rights of third parties in which he has for the agent. He has worked as an agent, but before that it was not.
Supreme Court to 562/2553.
The defendant entered into the construction of the highway. The defendant will be under contract is subcontract.The defendant is the company B to cause damage to the plaintiff. The defendant is liable to the plaintiff as a principal under Section 427.
Supreme Court in 6829/2551.
The first defendant and the plaintiff entered into a loan agreement, mortgage, land and building as security for such debt by the end of the mortgage agreement that If the plaintiff the mortgage money to pay the defendant a permit shall pay the deficiency until the defendant 2 is the wife by the law of the defendant that a consent to the defendant that a contract to recover the funds. The loans are made aware that the defendant has caused an increase in debt and have ratified it. Debt it owes the husband and wife as joint debtors under Section 1490 (4) The defendant's second wife to a husband with the defendant to the plaintiff liable to pay such debts as well.
Section 728 states just that. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor that the debt repayment period. Reasonable as defined in the notice. Not provided that notification shall be made in writing by providing the mortgage. The lawyer told the mortgage so they do not need to be made under section 798 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 3799/2551.
She owned the disputed land and the building by the defendant is the holder. Ownership of the petitioner. The defendant shall be a representative of the petitioner and the petitioner in a position which is in. Be anonymous. The defendant, whose name is the ownership of land and land disputes. To be mortgaged to the plaintiff. It allows a defendant who was representing his or her conduct was in the front. Land disputes. Barker did not cause prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff, a third party there. The defendant is represented. The plaintiff has worked, but the fact that the defendant is represented by Section 806 of the land dispute is binding on the petitioner. Whether she is aware of the mortgaged or not.
Supreme Court in 7354/2551.
The plaintiff's attorney, power of attorney document to the District 2 B act as specified by Article 15 of the 15 states that "the business stated in the letter of attorney to the attorney to delegate to. Bank official who is authorized to act on the behalf. But the delegate, as this will be a special one as it is authorized to act on behalf of or in operations in the power of the one does not "like the attorney to delegate to officers of acting on behalf of the plaintiff. However, a separate one. Are authorized to act on behalf of many of the other. Or act as an unlimited number of times not. Power of Attorney is a document labeled B District 3 appointee ... I would like to delegate and / or implemented in May ... the following activities with the Bank and ERA for the benefit of Bangkok Metropolitan Bank (Thailand) to finish No. 1 for the debt. .. Article 2 has the power to prosecute civil and issue notices and demands. Civil litigation and other litigation related to the completion of the receipt and documents of the Court Article 3 shall have the power to conduct such criminal complaint or police report accusing the ... etc.. As can be seen that the power to appoint such an attorney. The lawsuit is a civil action on behalf of several criminal complaint against the defendant in a criminal case against the two, regardless of whether the case is about. Nothing in particular. Therefore, the attorney general to sue the defendant's attorney during the two civil cases. And criminal matters without being limited to any civil or criminal action only. Any subject matter alone.2 appointee has no authority over the prosecution of this defendant. Plaintiffs have no authority to prosecute this
Supreme Court in 3497/2551.
Plaintiff to the defendant as a land agent. The plaintiff sued the defendant and forced to return money to redeem the mortgaged to the plaintiff. It is an indictment of the defendant, who represents the return of property under Section 810, even without proof of authority as they claim, the court was not contrary to Section 798 paragraph two.
According to the plaintiff's witnesses to demonstrate that the defendant is true. The plaintiff is the mortgagee to attest to a part as well. It need not have a book to reveal the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant was not attest for the changes in the land contract is not prohibited by P.wi.p. with Section 94 (b).
The plaintiff sued the defendant in a criminal case against a co-commission of the fraud. Sukhumvit district court judge reasoned that the circumstances of the dismissal by a reasonable doubt that defendant Mortgage of the plaintiff or not. To the benefit of the doubt to the defendant. The court dismissed the reason she did not get a mortgage, instead of the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit to force the defendant to redeem the mortgage payment to the plaintiff. The claim does not rely on the criminal misappropriation of guilty. Is not associated with criminal cases would apply not P.wi.a. Section 46.
Supreme Court in 2031/2551.
The objective of the business of the debtor's financial investment accounts as an agent. Must use caution and common ฝื hand as far as it takes. And should be required in the lender's money to invest, according to Section 807 and Section 659 paragraph two, paragraph three of the debtor and creditors to reduce the amount of bills issued by the Ministry and is certified. money orders payable to the University and its capital is invested by Sun for failure to comply with Aval confirmation of the debtor's investment policy. Committee of creditors that To invest in the bank accepted bill of exchange is an act by an agent. Without power or authority other than that of the delegation. The result was that the creditor can not collect money under the bill. The creditor has filed a bill from the payer's money and endorsements Aval. And has submitted an application for payment from the assets of the aval and court approval. The creditors have been paid. But it is not certain that the creditors are paid in full or not. The debtor's creditors have been causing the damage. The debtor is liable to pay compensation to the creditors.
Supreme Court in 1602/2551.
Legal and law enforcement to require evidence in writing. The agency must attest to the evidence as presented. The defendant can not be traced to the witness that the defendant signed a contract with the borrower. The defendant's loan. Hearing on the issue shall be cut or edit the text in the document as witnesses P.wi.p. Section 94 (b) an issue arises with the public order. Even though no party raised any law. The Supreme Court has ruled itself under Section 142 (5) of Section 246 and Section 247.
Supreme Court in 1690/2551.
Sat at a power of attorney to the pharmacist.'s Attorney during the time that Sun has not been authorized by the plaintiff to the lawsuit, instead, they find it is not. Get it right, according to the law will be void. The result was just that Saturday. To be filed by the plaintiff's attorney was made in that time. Only later, when the Sun is authorized by the plaintiff to the lawsuit, instead, it has not changed. The new power of attorney or power of attorney, so the result column. Have the power to appoint a lawyer, filing and prosecution of the plaintiff from the date authorized by the plaintiff, the Sat.
Section 801 paragraph (5) shall be the authorized representative of the general case where the authority. The lawsuit does not specify an agent to represent themselves, but in the power of attorney. The plaintiff said. Plaintiff's attorney to the attorney representing the plaintiff Sat. It shall have the power to sue and prosecute any person or entity. The act of causing damages to the plaintiff. Including the power to appoint a subagent The plaintiff's attorney representing the plaintiff has the power to direct the prosecution and not be stated specifically that a defendant sued or prosecuted against any person or any It is a lawful authority.
Supreme Court in 1333/2551.
Channel. Is to find the insured has a duty to persuade others to make insurance contracts. Living with the defendant. Not representative of the insurance coverage purchased by the defendant under the 2535 Act, Section 5 and Section 71 is not representative of the defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand. Knows or should know the actual text, while making sure the health certificate. .'ve disease, hepatitis, and many have dense due to alcohol treatment. Within the hospital. The defendant was aware of the fact that such a finding was not
Sun knows that it is not disclosed except for hepatitis, which may predispose to the actual text. The defendant denied the contract or would result in higher premiums for life insurance contract between the Sun and the defendant is void under Section 865 paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 1657/2550.
Section 728 stipulates that "when the mortgage is. Mortgagee shall mail notice to the debtor before ... "is not provided. Notice shall be in writing mortgages. Therefore, the plaintiff's attorney to the. Written notice of the mortgage, the defendant does not fall within the provisions of Section 798 paragraph one, given the agent must be in writing on that. A notice of the mortgage on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant received the letter. I did not notice. Payment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's lawsuit. The plaintiff accepts that the notice provisions of the new mortgage. The notice of the plaintiff. Held that the plaintiff, which it ratified in accordance with Section 823 shall constitute notice to the plaintiff by the then mortgage.
Supreme Court in 4870/2550.
Petitioner filed a petition to release the seized property claims. A land dispute has been raised by the petitioner, the mother of the petitioner. But because her husband was an alien who is a defendant in a letter. The benefits of a land dispute on behalf of the singer. The defendant was not aware of the disputed land to the husband of the plaintiff in the case of a mortgage. Petitioner's request, such as if it is true it is that she is. Is the anonymity allows defendants who represent themselves to be out front. It is entitled to possession of land disputes. Defendants dispute the mortgage on the land to the husband of the plaintiff and the facts did not appear. The plaintiff's husband was aware of the claimant to the defendant. She has a husband might prejudice the rights of the plaintiff, a third party. That the defendant's agent and earned the right to know that before the defendant is. Representative of the petitioner has not Tamp.p.p. Section 806 plaintiff, as trustee of her husband shall have the right to sue to enforce the disputed land. The petitioner has no right to release the seized property.
Supreme Court in 5140/2550.
Sat directors authorized to sign and seal of the defendant, acting on behalf of the defendant, even Sun does not have the seal of the defendant. The book received a debt of the defendant at the top of the paper, the behavior of the Sun is considered as an agent of the defendant, the Sun Sun made the debt to the plaintiff. The acts of the defendant. Books have been part of that debt. "... We must reduce the price you have to be more appropriate. The waiver of the monthly payment of such devices to "any action, it is a doubt as to whether that Accept the claim. Recognize the debt, which makes life a stumbling halt. Starting date specified in the statute books since the debt to no more than two years against the plaintiff's claim did not terminate the.
Supreme Court in 2345/2550.
The plaintiff is an entity that occurred during the MP is that MP is authorized on behalf of the plaintiff was the sole director of the Legal Affairs Division, which is a lower-ranking officials aware of the plaintiff. Aware of the violations and will require compensation. Assumes that the plaintiff can not know it was not the authority on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's statement of the duties and responsibilities of the director and the law is only the scope of responsibilities of the departments within your organization. Only that the plaintiff was a notice of claim to the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff's practice. Duty by the place as usual. Not act on behalf of the plaintiff as the assignment in the form of a. The agency will hold the actions of the Governor, so it appears that the plaintiff was aware that MP's officers as proposed by the hierarchy and down. Signed authorization to prosecute the defendant on August 16, 2542 the plaintiff must be aware and conscious violation of a person liable on such date. When the plaintiff filed on August 4, 2543 to the expiration of one year under Section 448, first paragraph, the plaintiff did not terminate the lawsuit.
Supreme Court in 2071 - 2074/2550.
The parties shall appoint a lawyer to practice and proceedings on their behalf by an agent under the Civil and Commercial Code and Civil Procedure Code Section 60 of the 15 agents. Although the agent will be extinguished when she died. Mr. Barker also has the power and duty to preserve the benefits management process. The singing continues until the successor or representative of the petitioner would be to preserve the results. Demanded by the interests of the parties to the petitioner's death under Section 42 Civil Procedure Code .
Barker died on November 30, 2546 while the case is under consideration by the Court of Appeal. The heirs or the estate trustee or guardian of the petitioner may be requested. The parties to the petitioner to preserve the benefits of the litigation of the claim within one year from the date of his death by Civil Procedure Code Section 42, there is no request from the petitioner as a party. such provisions. The claimant submitted the case. Court of Appeal has ordered the case removed from the directory. Court of Appeals read the instructions and listen to the parties on December 19, 2548 is regarded as an agent or attorney Lewgpgn time she will be under Section 828 and said she has no power. The petitioner further proceedings.
Supreme Court in 3913/2549.
Attorney who was authorized to provide. New. Filed a lawsuit against the court to complete all of the appointee. Obtained a warrant Was. Objection filed the lawsuit, but any non-specific. Was. Is authorized to act on behalf of the filing and prosecution in court. All cases indefinitely until an authorized person to withdraw the authorization.
Supreme Court in 2761/2549.
The plaintiff is one which is authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff, the two received land from the defendant as collateral for a loan that she borrowed from the plaintiff's second action the plaintiff, 2 Although the letter mortgage named plaintiff. 1 is a mortgagee only. Without specifying whether acting on behalf of the plaintiff, the second is the plaintiff, 2 of which are anonymous person to appear and take the mortgage, the plaintiff who first made on their behalf, the plaintiff, the two are right. made under Section 806 and the case is not governed by Section 798, paragraph one of the agents to the mortgage contract must be in writing. Even so, the agent of the plaintiff's second mortgage to a contract with the defendant, the defendant is not a written law. But when the plaintiff's rights under the second mortgage is right that there is an option for anonymity in accordance with Section 806, the plaintiff then has the power to sue to force a second mortgage.
Supreme Court in 5900/2549.
Car hire from the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement signing ceremony in the car rental agreement. Have not been changed by a car. The fact that a defendant is assigned two to a car lease from the plaintiff. Is not an offer to contract hire. It does not have an attorney of the defendant.
Supreme Court in 3913/2549.
Attorney who was a delegate to the. Filed a lawsuit against the court until the completion of all the new appointee. The power of attorney to act on behalf of the filing and prosecution in court at all. The case for an indefinite time until the power to revoke the authorization.
Supreme Court in 2761/2549.
The plaintiff is one which is authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff, the two received land from the defendant as collateral for a loan that she borrowed from the plaintiff's second action the plaintiff, 2 Although the letter mortgage named plaintiff. 1 is a mortgagee only. Without specifying whether acting on behalf of the plaintiff, the second is the plaintiff, 2 of which are anonymous person to appear and take the mortgage, the plaintiff who first made on their behalf, the plaintiff, the two are right. made under Section 806 and the case is not governed by Section 798, paragraph one of the agents to the mortgage contract must be in writing. Even so, the agent of the plaintiff's second mortgage to a contract with the defendant, the defendant is not a written law. But when the plaintiff's rights under the second mortgage is right that there is an option for anonymity in accordance with Section 806, the plaintiff then has the power to sue to force a second mortgage.
Supreme Court in 3093/2549.
The District was authorized to request the return of the petitioner to the court proceedings until This is the most Including the right to appeal the court and is entitled to appoint an agent to perform. Replace as necessary any of its delegated authority to the district, the petition for a motorcycle in the middle of the night. In the second letter of authorization is specified only that the District Court for the filing of the night to get a motorcycle without a right to appeal to that court them. But considering the power of attorney and two together, I understand that I am authorized to have the right to legal proceedings until the case is finalized. It also includes the right to appeal or petition to appoint a lawyer. The appeal court as well.
Supreme Court in 7022/2548.
The representative must be appointed by the clear expression or indirectly by them to have. Power to comply with Section 797 of the Act does not appear that the plaintiff, defendant's appointed representative. The defendants testified that the defendant's agent or broker to sell a car to lease to third parties. The fact that an agreement made between the defendant and the defendant is merely an agreement to the defendant's possession of the vehicle at lease one of the defendants not only the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant to perform. The defendants offered to purchase the vehicle from the defendant that it is delivered as an agent of the defendant No. 1 in sales to third parties. And not on behalf of the plaintiff. Both defendants are liable for the disputed vehicle to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 1664/2548.
The plaintiff hired the defendant to two to come before the construction of commercial buildings. The second defendant, the defendant consented to a construction contract with plaintiff, defendant, a commercial building, it is implied that the second defendant's case is not the agent because the agent is not the desire. To be bound with third parties for the actions of agents.
Supreme Court in 2178/2548.
Plaintiff to the defendant as a land agent. The plaintiff sued the defendant and forced to change the name of the mortgagee is named as a plaintiff. The indictment called the defendant's property from an agency under Section 810 even though there is no evidence as to the legal action was not contrary to Section 798.
Supreme Court in 5196/2548.
Termination of a contract to buy and sell land in any case, no legal force. Must be in writing. The power to terminate the contract should not be made in writing as well. The plaintiff testified that in determining whether the plaintiff has been assigned a lawyer. The termination notice to the defendant. Intention of plaintiff to demonstrate that the actions of the lawyer to act. Plaintiffs in such cases. It held that the plaintiff had been ratified in accordance with Section 823 of the termination and the like.
Plaintiff a letter terminating the contract and termination of the plaintiff has completed. Even later, the defendant will have notice of transfer of title to land again, and the plaintiff. Land Office, pursuant to such appointment. It is just to give you the opportunity to transfer land to the defendant to the plaintiff. Was no longer a dispute. However, it appears that the defendant was in default again. Such circumstances that the plaintiff did not doubt that the defendant terminated the contract with it.
The contract between the parties, each party must return to the other party. As such, according to the existing Section 391, paragraph one, the defendant is obligated to return the money received and shall pay to the plaintiff. Interest to the plaintiff from the date on which the interest in such cases. This is not the default interest rate. The defendant's conduct is a breach of contract. The plaintiff has terminated the contract. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest. Although the purchase and sale agreement will not require that the plaintiff will be charged interest from the defendant. If the defendant's breach of contract or otherwise. However, the plaintiff shall be entitled to charge interest under section 391 paragraph two.
Supreme Court in 1470/2548.
Power of attorney, the attorney for the civil proceedings that the plaintiff's attorney to prosecute the contract on behalf of the plaintiff in a contract dispute, when a dispute concerning the rights of the plaintiff against any individual attorney. Instead, the plaintiff shall have the power to prosecute an entity designated by it. Must determine whether to prosecute the defendant again.
Supreme Court in 6550/2547.
Providing power to prosecute is not restricted by law to be authorized to sue anyone. Any particular case is the only The attorney has stated clearly that the plaintiff was authorized to. Authorized the prosecution of Mr. Sun, Mr. Sun has a different power to prosecute the plaintiff sued the defendants, including five of the debtor of the plaintiff in a case like this as well. The plaintiffs do not have a specific power of attorney to sue the other five defendants.
Supreme Court in 7626/2547.
Plaintiff is a representative of the defendant in borrowing from banks. The loan proceeds were donated to the defendant. Even as the loan is not evidenced in writing under Section 798, paragraph two, it has been in force between the agents. When the plaintiff was forced to repay the loan. The defendant must be liable to pay the principal and interest, the plaintiff must go back to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 15/2547.
The documents indicate that the plaintiff had a contract of carriage by sea is just. Shipping in the defendant's table 1 is derived from the second defendant to the plaintiff to bring to an informed decision whether to ship to. With the ship or not. Of lading, which is considered as evidence of the contract of carriage by sea is not our case 1 is the carrier, despite the company accused the two, however, accused the two states that have signed in the cargo hold as a carrier. In addition, the contract of carriage by sea, the carrier must be paid the freight, but the defendant paid a pension from the plaintiff is a representative of the difference of the freight. The defendant is first charged to the plaintiff, less the freight to the fact that one can advance the plaintiff to the defendant No. 2 on the freight on behalf of the carrier will be sent to the principal is. Carrier and Defendants 1 and 2 have been paid as a commission agent. It can not be said that a defendant is a carrier and two co-defendants transported the defendant to a defendant when the two are the only representatives of the maritime transportation of the plaintiff. The pension is paid. Yes, it is to find a carrier that paid the freight did not. Both defendants are not liable to pay costs and damages caused by that. Court order not to arrive on time.
Supreme Court to 10443/2546.
The defendant and the plaintiff to recover money from the plaintiff's attorney signed the form without restrictions. The defendant offered to take them. The agreement that if the plaintiff no reimbursement. The defendant used the documents to the transfer of the disputed land belongs to the defendant. The plaintiff was unable to repay the money to defendant and the defendant has been completed in Such power of attorney, then the transfer of disputed land to the defendant. Is agreed upon. The defendant has the authority to do so. Power of Attorney is not fraudulent documents. Legal disputes and the transfer of land to the defendant, is void.
Supreme Court in 1112/2546.
The court initially sentenced the defendant in this case, the debt payment of wages for construction. HMS Institute of Technology, the petitioner filed a petition management company f-tech school. A defendant who is not temporary. Unless the defendant will come back. The petitioner was appointed by the court to manage the affairs of the School of Education Technology. Shall have the meaning inherent in it. She has the power. Management of school affairs, but only in Education Technology. The court ordered the case to be either temporarily, as needed. To manage the assets of a defendant who is not in accordance with Section 48 paragraph one for cases where the court is the petitioner. Managing the assets of the defendant, who is under Section 48 paragraph two, which will allow the petitioner to have the same authority. Agent, attorney general, not even in an emergency, she could not violate it. Management in the business of the defendant. She has no power to apply to this case.
Supreme Court in 1398/2545.
I was doing a power of attorney to act on behalf of the petitioner and the Bank. The applicant shall have the power to get your car in a criminal case No. 1769/2542 of the black night, Narathiwat Provincial Court. Which shows that the petitioner was appointed to the grade and the Bank is authorized to act on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner's attorney that the attorney did not limit individual. Must be made jointly by the authorized attorney, so one can apply it in the middle of the night.
Supreme Court in 4446/2545.
The defendant's second possession of the car and offered to the plaintiff. Defendant both agreed that the ownership of the cars belonging to the defendant at 1 until the defendant to two to get paid for the car from the plaintiff and to pay for the car to the defendant a complete defense at first to be listed transferable. the plaintiff. Held that the defendant 1 is the anonymity and allow the defendant to two representatives at the front is that it owns or has the right to sell motor defendant 1 should be liable to the plaintiff, who in good faith. shall not prejudice its rights. From the agreement of the defendant No. 1 and 2 and the fact that one can not claim that the Court determines the defendant is a book out and ask to be informed of the agreement between the defendant and did so on the plaintiff to pay. the defendant's vehicle to complete the two defendants had a duty to the plaintiff and the defendant's car registration tax that has not received payment for a car of defendant No. 2 is not an excuse to refuse registration of transfer of title to plaintiff. The rights, duties and obligations between the agent as a defendant. Both are correct, I have another. With respect to the first defendant to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 1217/2545.
Attorney stated clearly that Co., Ltd. The plaintiff attorney to delegate at the Sun with the authority to litigate cases against the two accused to the court that the contract of guarantee if it is authorized to buy at any one Sat. litigation against the defendants both breach of contract and lease. Only insurance companies at the same company sued the defendant as an MP and one time only. What people have done a separate lawsuit against the other defendant or both parties. More than once, not even an MP is appointed a lawyer and at one time the plaintiff testified as a witness. It is evident that both parties be in the same business. It is the only person authorized to act on one or more persons. Which stamp duty is only 10 baht, according to rate of stamp duty, the provisions of Article 7 (a) When the plaintiff stamp duty on the attorney $ 30 to complete the provisions of Section 104 and the accounting rate of stamp duty, the provisions of Article 7 (a) the power of attorney. therefore be used as evidence in a case under the provisions of Section 118.
Supreme Court in 6728/2545.
Assigned to the plaintiff's counsel notice to the defendant by an assignment of mortgage does. The writing is not like the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 798, but had not received notice of the mortgage debt. The plaintiff brought a lawsuit was filed, the plaintiff accepted the notice of the mortgage and the ratification of the acts of the lawyer's lawyer. The lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the notice required under the Civil and Commercial Mortgages, Section 823.
A. as an assistant bank manager of the plaintiff. Are responsible for supervising the accounts receivable outstanding defaulted debt. And follow up calls for debt arrears. The plaintiff's witnesses testified about the defendant's liability and that there is indeed a testimony to what the witnesses are involved in and informed us. I testified as a witness. The testimony of. I do not have to listen to as the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 95 (2).
Supreme Court in 1052/2538.
Plaintiff to sign in Power of attorney by the defendant to enter into a letter of authorization to enter. Message that the plaintiff authorized the defendant is authorized to submit an application for registration of transfer. Land disputes are one of the plaintiff to the defendant by the plaintiff, but by acts. Transfer arising from the fraud is deemed void if not a legal transfer has occurred. Ownership of the disputed land still belongs to the plaintiff or the defendant to take second. Welcome to a land dispute from the defendant, the defendant is not entitled under 2. Legal mortgage, the plaintiff is entitled to. Cancel legal. The defendant a mortgage on the defendant 2.
Supreme Court in 1966/2526.
Even representatives of the defendants entered into an agreement to sell to the plaintiff, but the fact that I have. Representatives of the defendants entered into agreements on behalf of the defendant and the defendant's own agents. The plaintiff as a tool. Without the consent of the defendant as a principal. The defendant shall not be bound under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 805.
Supreme Court to 598/2506.
The land to her grandchildren. To do so, the legal authority to do so, even as he is a minor is not authorized.
