Section 959 the bill will have recourse to those who endorse Payer, and others that it was liable under the bill.
A) Recourse when bills are due, if not used.
B) recourse, even if the bills are due in the following cases will be discussed.
(1) If they reject it, accepting bills.
(2) if the payment will be accepted or not. I went bankrupt. Or to refrain from piling up. Even if a debt waiver will not be sentenced as evidence. Or if the detention and confiscation of the money was fruitless.
(3) If the bills are not payable to any one of them went bankrupt.
Section 960 of the exchange of money or lack of it. As evidenced by the need to make a mess with one document. Called on the opposition.
This objection does not apply to funds in which it will use the money. One day, or within three days, but then go.
The objection is not guaranteed to be made within the time limit prescribed. For the submission of bills was approved. Or within three days, but then go.
When an objection is not accepted, then it shall not apply to the use of funds. And do not object to the use of funds.
In the case of those that are mentioned in Section 959 (b) (2) You know who also might have recourse. Until they have filed bills to pay the money and has made an objection to it.
In many cases, such as Section 959 (b) (3) that if they sentenced him to order the payment of which is shown below. Are sufficient to allow the holder to exercise the recourse.
Section 961 objection to the sheriff. Or deputy sheriff. The lawyer who allowed this to be done.
Minister of Justice to issue regulations to implement the provisions of this Code. And the licensing and the opposition. Including the rate relating to the court fees.
Section 962 of the objection to the name, position and signature of the authority. Copies of bills for all items must be endorsed with the word personal statement indicating the volume is. The following.
(1) Name or brand of the person objected to and condemned.
(2) any information or to make a statement against the bill. The call and response, if any. Or that a person pays or not to be found.
(3) If the certificate. Or use the money to fix this. To discuss the nature of the face and the name or brand of certified or users. Money to fix his face and name of the person's face it.
(4) place and date of the objection.
Who made the objection for objection to the request to do so. The objection was made to give notice of opposition to the objection. If the residence is to be sent by registered mail postage. Or delivered to the domicile of that. I do not know the country is close to where a copy of the objection can be easily seen at the local District Office and who condemned the resident's back.
Section 963 shall be given notice that he does not endorse the bill or not. Money on his endorsement to both the payer and within four days. Per day of protest. Or the date of the ticket in case of a requirement that "Does not have an objection."
The endorsement of all people need to give notice to the person next to her endorsement to two days. You notice that they receive. Take notice of the names and agencies who have given notice before any such order to do this together until the payer. The time limit is mentioned. But when you count the one I've told people before.
If the Bureau does not endorse any one of their better. Or states, but not the good. I notice that you'll have to endorse anyone before, it shall be enough.
A person must give notice. Will notice that there is an even exchange, but by night it is sent. The need to prove that the notice within the time prescribed.
If you notice, in writing, registered mail. If the letter is mailed within the above gem. The notice shall be deemed to have been delivered within the time limit is enforced.
Any person who fails to give notice within the limited time that such a recourse is not to be liable for any damage caused by the negligence of its own. But shall not exceed the amount of compensation in exchange.
Section 964 is written to that specification. "Need not have any objection" from "no objection" from or in any other case like that better. Payer or the endorsement will not relieve the holder of the objection is not certified or do not cash it. So they will have recourse.
This requirement. He would not release them from duty to submit the bills within the time prescribed. The duty to provide notice of bills, lack of trust to endorse anyone before. The duty payable or not attest to comply with the prescribed time limit will fall to the person who sought to take on those who are against the bill.
This requirement. If the order is written to it. It is with the counterparty to all those who had signed the bill. If both requirements are then. He also oppose the objection gem. You know who must pay for it. If the requirements for a written endorsement. If the objection is made soon. That cost may be a valid objection from other parties who have signed the bill.
Section 965 of the bills in the country. If the money saved in the draft as a repudiation does not endorse or reject the money, both dated and signed by you as an objection, it shall be. No need to do and who have given notice to the person whom the lack of trust. Intention to recourse within four days from the day he did not reject the certification.
Section 966 notice the lack of reliability is not guaranteed or your money is a must have item. On the bill. Name or brand of the payer and the payer. Amount to be spent on bills. The holder's name or brands, and Bill. The opposition or the date of repudiation does not endorse any money. With the message that he is not certified or do not use that money bills.
Section 967 of the bill. I endorse it payable to those who endorse it, or guarantee by aval it. Shall be jointly liable to the holder.
He shall have the right to remove admonish them individually or all together, they are required by the order in which they were not binding.
The same. Every person who shall have to sign the bill and then take notes. In order to apply it to those who have already committed themselves.
Admonition to the parties took part. Which shall not be liable to admonish Tadhntag out to others even if both parties would be in the correct order, the person who took it.
Section 968 who will claim the money from a person whom he is the right of recourse.
(1) the amount of money which he does not approve or does not apply to the interest. If there is a requirement that the interest
(2) interest rate of five percent per year from the date due.
(3) the cost of the objection. And to give notice to the endorsement of the holder next to her, and payer. And other expenses.
(4) for which no fee was agreed. You think of one sixth of the money will be used by the bills. And whether the case is. You shall not charge rates higher than this.
If the right of recourse before maturity. You to deduct the amount of bills down to five percent.
Section 969 which held a party and the bidding could be called out from his contract which he is liable.
(1) the full amount of money which they used to.
(2) interest on that amount. Rate of five percent per year from the date of the fund.
(3) other expenses that they have to go out.
(4) is drawn off from the amount of money in bills of exchange as defined in Section § 968 (4).
Section 970 agreements which all parties shall be recourse or a recourse to them. May be used to call him to take their bills to the objection and accounting for the money, too.
The endorsing anyone who holds it and honor it. To cross out the endorsement of its own and of those who endorsed it after they lose it.
Section 971 and ordered to pay it. All of it. The man before endorsing it. He endorsed the draft or transfer to another one of those chips. I have the right to take recourse to the party of which he would be liable under the bill, he already has not.
Section 972 in the event of recourse to the approved part. That party has spent a number of them do not endorse it. May be called to indicate that taking into account the receipt of the bills and called to her. In addition, the bill requires that a certified copy of the bill is correct to the party and the opposition as well. So that he can have recourse in the future.
Section 973 on schedule, which is said to have been the Lewgpgn.
(1) deadline for filing a bill to spend money on it. In later years one has seen.
(2) the period for making objections to non-recognition or non-use of funds.
(3) The deadline for applying to the fund. In the case of a requirement that "Does not have an objection."
You know who would be entitled to take recourse to these other parties endorsing the payer and the person liable. Unless the certification.
Incidentally, if he fails to submit the bill to provide certification within the time limited as specified payer. You know who would lose their right to recourse to the fact that he did not take the money and he does not endorse any of the terms that Payer refers only to detach themselves from the insurance certificate.
The regulations limit the time the bill has to be endorsed. Only endorsed him but would only be taken advantage of the provision.
Section 974 of the bill better. Objection to it. If for some reason which is not necessarily violate the do not obstruct the due date. For the gem. You have to extend the deadline further.
Necessity, which is not bad as they violate them. Who has the endorsement given to the person next to them without delay. The notice shall be specified in the bill. Or identification card to be dated and signed by the holder other than those mentioned. You to enforce the provisions of Section 963.
When necessary, it may violate the end it was down. He must give his approval or payment of bills without delay. If an objection is made up.
If necessary, which is not to violate them. Continue to exist as more than thirty days after bills are due soon. You have the right to any recourse. And if so, to submit bills from. Objection to it. Shall not be required to do so.
The types of bills that spend money on it. Or spend time one could see it later. The thirty day like that recently. You from the day the Lord has given notice which is not necessary to violate. Those who endorse it to the next. Although the deadline for bills to pass. It is treated as such.
Supreme Court in 1783/2551.
The issuance of promissory notes. And its 16 percent interest rate per annum as agreed by Section 911, 968 (1) of Section 985, the law does not place any restrictions on the parties may agree. It is not a loan within the meaning of Act not to exceed the rate of interest at the rate specified in the promissory note at 16 percent per year, it's not the case, the interest rate which would be an offense under the Act and do not require. prohibited by Section 654, according to promissory notes and interest to sue is not void.
Supreme Court in 2569/2551.
R. companies to sell the disputed checks signed by the plaintiff by the endorsement. The plaintiff, who by law. When the bank refused to cash the check. Defendants who are ordered to pay, and Rama, who have endorsed a common liability to the plaintiff under Section 914 and Section 967 and Section 989 of the first paragraph shall be considered as a debtor to do so when the plaintiff. compromise agreement, which is regarded as one of the new debt the plaintiff would be entitled to claim payment for their companies, according to Rama, the compromise agreement. No right to call the company liable for the debt, according to Rama in one settlement. The plaintiff's right to claim against the defendant as a liability to the plaintiff in order to pay them. Debt settlement will put an end to the check. This is because the debt-claim in the case of the plaintiff in a settlement to end.
Supreme Court in 6054/2550.
The Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited (), which pays the bills were signed in, it is certified under Section 927 must be bound to pay the amount certified by the certification body of their compliance. Section 937 of the debtor and the one with the defendant, one of which is payable to the defendant that one is not in a position to be committed before the Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited () under Section 967, paragraph three, so when the Bank of Thailand. Ltd. (PCL) has been paid to the company, Toyota Motor (Thailand) Ltd., which is the honoring of 92 copies to the Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited () is the recourse that the defendant is one who commands. can not afford it. When there is no recourse then. Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited (), it shall have no claim to be transferred to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power in this case is a problem with the power to sue is an issue relating to public order. Even during the discretion of the court. Both defendants waived the issue to this dispute. The two defendants were entitled to raise claims in the appeal under section 225 paragraph two Civil Procedure Code.
Supreme Court in 5477/2550.
Civil Procedure Code Section 4 (1) states that the indictment be presented to the court that the defendant is domiciled in the district court. Or to the court that the case was in court that the defendant is domiciled, in accordance with the provisions of the criminal cycle, or the means to cause the carriage as the source of the plaintiff's argument that the right to sue. According to the complaint of the plaintiff that the defendant ordered to pay out a district, as the case proceeds to reimburse the District has purchased land to the defendant the amount of 140,000 Baht to the district, such as the date when the check payable to Nam. to billing. But the bank refuses to pay the check, even as I was the victim, while in case the bank refuses to pay. Whether the plaintiff was not injured. But when I said I was transferred to the plaintiff in the dispute. By endorsing the settlement check and deliver to the plaintiff. He and the plaintiff shall be entitled to the same district, in order to enforce against the defendant who has already committed before the third paragraph under Section 967 and Section 989, first paragraph, the plaintiff has sued the defendants. the payer to pay the plaintiff a check. The liability of the defendants in the dispute occurred when the bank refuses to pay the place where the check was refused to pay the carriage is indeed the place where born. When the bank refuses to pay the check is in the jurisdiction of the Court. It held that the case was in court. Plaintiff's complaint, the Court has power to all the provisions of that law.
Supreme Court in 4789/2549.
Promissory notes issued by the specified date is September 30, 2540 maturity date of October 31, 2540 using the interest rate per annum BBL MOR +1 on the promissory note the defendant is required to charge interest. And does not specify that the interest from any So the interest rate specified in the promissory note from the date of the ticket, according to Section 911, 968, 985 on October 31, 2540 to date, a defendant does not pay the bills. Shall be deemed to constitute a default by the defendant upon the second paragraph of Section 204 by a creditor does not require prior notice or demand whatsoever. When an assignment of this claim to the plaintiff. Behalf of the plaintiff as assignee of the original creditor has a claim for the value. All existing debt as well as debt of the two defendants.
Supreme Court in 4264/2548.
Check the documentation changed. Cheques made payable to the plaintiff when the defendant does not indicate that the plaintiff in a position to pay. B. The plaintiff is the trustee of the plaintiff as a holder in accordance with the law. When the bank refused to cash the check. As a check by the plaintiff who is injured and has the power to sue on behalf of the plaintiff. Himself without a suffix to the name of the plaintiff as trustee in the case of B. However, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants described checks payable to the plaintiff to pay the debt. Compromise agreement documents filed at the number 1 and 2, which is considered the documents filed as part of a lawsuit. The compromise agreement stated that the defendant sued for payment by check. The plaintiff as the plaintiff is a trustee of the B is considered the plaintiff sued as trustee under the compromise agreement. Attached to the lawsuit as well.
Supreme Court in 7988/2542.
The plaintiff sued the defendants and ordered to pay in exchange for a cash settlement from the plaintiff, but the facts. I agree that both plaintiff and defendant in exchange for money to each other. Fresh from a third party check made payable to the plaintiff by the defendant in the billing. Paid by check, payable to the plaintiff in any way. Thus, the defendant disputed the check to the plaintiff was not an issue for According to the lawsuit in exchange for cash from the plaintiff. The plaintiff, who was not checked by law. I will check out the dispute form and they are in possession of the plaintiff. However, as the holder of the check holder would need to be checked into the hold. Is to do well. When the plaintiff is not a full check by the law. The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the two defendants dispute liability in the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 7336/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant is liable for the debt under the loan or sell the promissory notes. Payment made to the plaintiff. Without action, the defendants are liable for the debt under the promissory note. The defendant asked the court to the defendants, as the issue became a co-defendant. Defendants have denied liability for the fight to be paid by the defendant, the case is a dispute about the debt, according to promissory notes.
The defendants disputed the bank issued promissory notes of the plaintiff to the defendant by aval District is committed to spending bills at the bank by the plaintiff before the date of the next province to be used. The defendant has brought the Bills to a contract for the sale to repay debt. The agreement, if the plaintiff bank in May, according to the bill. Defendant to plead guilty, pay at the rate of 15 percent per year, plus interest to the plaintiff on the promissory notes did not dispute plaintiff's bill. It is because the Court ordered a temporary freeze in case another request. Any of the defendants. The defendant's breach of contract to sell the promissory notes to plaintiff. The defendant shall be liable to pay the disputed bills with interest rates of 15 percent per year under contract to the plaintiff.
Promissory note dispute to the plaintiff if the defendant is aval for promissory notes, payment settlement to the plaintiff, as agreed upon. In the sale of promissory notes. Promissory note dispute that the defendant would have been in possession as the payee and The ticket holder has the right to claim money from the plaintiff and the defendant joined the aval. The issue was also the case when the court sentenced the defendant to pay the promissory notes. Cash settlement to the plaintiff and the case is finally gone. It is money paid to the defendant to the plaintiff under the sale of promissory notes. Obligations under the promissory note, which is the case for the defendant and plaintiff. Take recourse to remove the defendants 1 and 2, under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 940 shall be filed since the date of filing forward. The defendant did not have to pay to the plaintiff's case notes. Interest before the filing of the agreement to sell the promissory notes. When the defendant's breach of contract, bills of sale. The defendant is still liable to pay to the plaintiff. The defendants are liable to pay the bills from the dispute to the plaintiff. Today is the day that the plaintiff can sue, which is considered a right of recourse. So before you sue a defendant's interest is not liable to pay to the plaintiff.
Promissory note dispute is not a matter of interest. The promissory note interest rate. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 968 (2) Section 985 shall have recourse only a 5 percent interest per annum for the two lower courts ruled that the defendants issued a promissory note and Liable for the debt, promissory note interest rate of 7.5 percent per year, it is not lawful. Even if the defendant does not appeal to the Supreme Court But this is about the power to sue, a legal issue arises. With public order. Supreme Court lifted a correct diagnosis and correct the execution. The Civil Section 142
the Supreme Court to 64/2537.
The plaintiff is licensed by the Ministry of Finance to fund the business. While the plaintiff by the defendant borrowed money from bank notes to the plaintiff. Thailand, which plaintiff is entitled to interest from customers in rates. 18.5 percent per year promissory notes issued to the plaintiff, defendant, two requirements that interest them. 18 and 18.5 percent per year, respectively. It is not stated that the interest from any So the interest rate specified in the promissory note, both of these. From the date of the ticket under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 911 968 695 when the interest rates by the legal bills. The defendant said the money due the plaintiff, who is at fault, it has the right idea. The rate of payments under the promissory note until paid. Completed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, first paragraph.
Supreme Court to 935/2534.
The plaintiff sued the defendants both jointly issued the bills of exchange and sell them to the plaintiff. The plaintiff charged the bill does not. The plaintiff asked the defendant to pay the bills, both with interest at a rate of 17.5 percent per year as agreed with the plaintiff, it is understandable that the interest in Such a high rate under the bill for it. The end of the plaintiff filed a copy of the draft agreement for the sale of two of the defendants sued by the plaintiff did not obscure The plaintiff filed a breach of contract sales force bills. Not sue to enforce the provisions of the money is coming into force of Section 963 and 973 is not so. The plaintiff sued the defendant shall have the power and without notice to not use the money to the defendant two days before the plaintiff sued the defendant in four of the second contract to sell the bills. Interest rates must be based on the agreed case 2 will be at the rate of 5 percent per year under Section 968 (2) the defendant's breach of contract sales at the two bills. The plaintiff claims the defendant to comply with two laws that do not have a specific age. The age of 10 years.
Supreme Court to 935/2534.
The plaintiff sued the defendants to the bill of sale to the plaintiff and the defendant charged accordingly. Bill did not. The defendant paid the bill with interest at a rate of 17.5 percent per year, as agreed, it is understandable that such an interest. Sales contracts, bills and the filing of the plaintiff to attach a copy of the contract sales to come up with money even when the plaintiff filed a lecture honoring contracts or bills of sale. The plaintiff sued, it is evident that the condition of the plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to comply. Sales contracts, bills and asked to enforce the contract. The plaintiff sued the law. A. The plaintiffs are not authorized to sell the bank branch manager, plaintiff, the plaintiff's bills. A. The plaintiff's attorney to prosecute on the discounting of such bills. The plaintiff has ratified the trade bill to reduce it. The plaintiff filed a breach of contract sales force bills. No action required by the bill. I do not recall notice to not use the money to the defendant within four days, according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 963 and the interest rate shall be as agreed. Than 5 percent per year under Section 968 (2) sales contracts, bills, no law requires a specific age. The age of 10 years.
Supreme Court in 3915/2533.
Check out the defendant pay the plaintiff to hire tractors and seven installments at the bank refused to cash the check at all. The defendant has paid the outstanding payment by check to the dispute to the plaintiff. But the bank refuses to pay by check another matter. The plaintiff has terminated the contract. I break the lease since both parties check payable to the defendant. Prior to the plaintiff's termination. It is the lease that the plaintiff had already been paid by check instead of cash. I need to hire the plaintiff had not been paid and is overdue. The settlement will be paid out because the bank refuses to pay. Debt does not hold the check until the check is already spent. Defendant is liable for the debt in dispute. When the plaintiff's rights to sell the checks to the bank. Bank bill by check and the plaintiff did not have the money to pay to the bank the check is returned back to the plaintiff sued the defendant shall be entitled to payment by check to both parties.
Supreme Court in 1162/2533.
Check, cross out the words "or bearer" on the left front of the check, and stamped the letter said. "A / C, the transfer of Li Yi" (A/C PAYEEONLY) transferable by check. The payee must be taken into account. If they can transfer to others only by their shape and effect the transfer of shares. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, the second paragraph of Section 917 and Section 989 provisions. Which must be made in writing to complete. And will raise up against third persons only upon notice in writing to the transfer. Debtor or the debtor agrees in writing to the transfer, so the three defendants who entered into a compromise in the dispute are willing to pay the plaintiff a check for dispute and the court allowed the case to it. When the plaintiff received in settlement of the case is transferred to the defendant a second payer to a book, or one of the two defendants have consented in writing to the assignment. He is not in dispute that the plaintiff will have recourse to the second defendant, a payer, a message similar to one that is transferable, the second defendant was not liable to reimburse the plaintiff in the dispute.
Supreme Court in 1416/2521.
Law is not forced to take a foreign language translation to ensure the accuracy of any successor to the defendant that the translation is not accurate or inaccurate, however, the defendant would have liked. The debate or the correct translation.
The payer and the plaintiff when the defendant is liable to pay, which has endorsed the bill. I refused to pay the money. The bill was considered by taking a representative payee and bill them accordingly. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 970, therefore the plaintiff is entitled to the honor and interest on the amount of the charge. Rate of five percent per year from the date of payment to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 969.
Was honored for a period of debt repayment, then the plaintiff will not be such a demand.
A) Recourse when bills are due, if not used.
B) recourse, even if the bills are due in the following cases will be discussed.
(1) If they reject it, accepting bills.
(2) if the payment will be accepted or not. I went bankrupt. Or to refrain from piling up. Even if a debt waiver will not be sentenced as evidence. Or if the detention and confiscation of the money was fruitless.
(3) If the bills are not payable to any one of them went bankrupt.
Section 960 of the exchange of money or lack of it. As evidenced by the need to make a mess with one document. Called on the opposition.
This objection does not apply to funds in which it will use the money. One day, or within three days, but then go.
The objection is not guaranteed to be made within the time limit prescribed. For the submission of bills was approved. Or within three days, but then go.
When an objection is not accepted, then it shall not apply to the use of funds. And do not object to the use of funds.
In the case of those that are mentioned in Section 959 (b) (2) You know who also might have recourse. Until they have filed bills to pay the money and has made an objection to it.
In many cases, such as Section 959 (b) (3) that if they sentenced him to order the payment of which is shown below. Are sufficient to allow the holder to exercise the recourse.
Section 961 objection to the sheriff. Or deputy sheriff. The lawyer who allowed this to be done.
Minister of Justice to issue regulations to implement the provisions of this Code. And the licensing and the opposition. Including the rate relating to the court fees.
Section 962 of the objection to the name, position and signature of the authority. Copies of bills for all items must be endorsed with the word personal statement indicating the volume is. The following.
(1) Name or brand of the person objected to and condemned.
(2) any information or to make a statement against the bill. The call and response, if any. Or that a person pays or not to be found.
(3) If the certificate. Or use the money to fix this. To discuss the nature of the face and the name or brand of certified or users. Money to fix his face and name of the person's face it.
(4) place and date of the objection.
Who made the objection for objection to the request to do so. The objection was made to give notice of opposition to the objection. If the residence is to be sent by registered mail postage. Or delivered to the domicile of that. I do not know the country is close to where a copy of the objection can be easily seen at the local District Office and who condemned the resident's back.
Section 963 shall be given notice that he does not endorse the bill or not. Money on his endorsement to both the payer and within four days. Per day of protest. Or the date of the ticket in case of a requirement that "Does not have an objection."
The endorsement of all people need to give notice to the person next to her endorsement to two days. You notice that they receive. Take notice of the names and agencies who have given notice before any such order to do this together until the payer. The time limit is mentioned. But when you count the one I've told people before.
If the Bureau does not endorse any one of their better. Or states, but not the good. I notice that you'll have to endorse anyone before, it shall be enough.
A person must give notice. Will notice that there is an even exchange, but by night it is sent. The need to prove that the notice within the time prescribed.
If you notice, in writing, registered mail. If the letter is mailed within the above gem. The notice shall be deemed to have been delivered within the time limit is enforced.
Any person who fails to give notice within the limited time that such a recourse is not to be liable for any damage caused by the negligence of its own. But shall not exceed the amount of compensation in exchange.
Section 964 is written to that specification. "Need not have any objection" from "no objection" from or in any other case like that better. Payer or the endorsement will not relieve the holder of the objection is not certified or do not cash it. So they will have recourse.
This requirement. He would not release them from duty to submit the bills within the time prescribed. The duty to provide notice of bills, lack of trust to endorse anyone before. The duty payable or not attest to comply with the prescribed time limit will fall to the person who sought to take on those who are against the bill.
This requirement. If the order is written to it. It is with the counterparty to all those who had signed the bill. If both requirements are then. He also oppose the objection gem. You know who must pay for it. If the requirements for a written endorsement. If the objection is made soon. That cost may be a valid objection from other parties who have signed the bill.
Section 965 of the bills in the country. If the money saved in the draft as a repudiation does not endorse or reject the money, both dated and signed by you as an objection, it shall be. No need to do and who have given notice to the person whom the lack of trust. Intention to recourse within four days from the day he did not reject the certification.
Section 966 notice the lack of reliability is not guaranteed or your money is a must have item. On the bill. Name or brand of the payer and the payer. Amount to be spent on bills. The holder's name or brands, and Bill. The opposition or the date of repudiation does not endorse any money. With the message that he is not certified or do not use that money bills.
Section 967 of the bill. I endorse it payable to those who endorse it, or guarantee by aval it. Shall be jointly liable to the holder.
He shall have the right to remove admonish them individually or all together, they are required by the order in which they were not binding.
The same. Every person who shall have to sign the bill and then take notes. In order to apply it to those who have already committed themselves.
Admonition to the parties took part. Which shall not be liable to admonish Tadhntag out to others even if both parties would be in the correct order, the person who took it.
Section 968 who will claim the money from a person whom he is the right of recourse.
(1) the amount of money which he does not approve or does not apply to the interest. If there is a requirement that the interest
(2) interest rate of five percent per year from the date due.
(3) the cost of the objection. And to give notice to the endorsement of the holder next to her, and payer. And other expenses.
(4) for which no fee was agreed. You think of one sixth of the money will be used by the bills. And whether the case is. You shall not charge rates higher than this.
If the right of recourse before maturity. You to deduct the amount of bills down to five percent.
Section 969 which held a party and the bidding could be called out from his contract which he is liable.
(1) the full amount of money which they used to.
(2) interest on that amount. Rate of five percent per year from the date of the fund.
(3) other expenses that they have to go out.
(4) is drawn off from the amount of money in bills of exchange as defined in Section § 968 (4).
Section 970 agreements which all parties shall be recourse or a recourse to them. May be used to call him to take their bills to the objection and accounting for the money, too.
The endorsing anyone who holds it and honor it. To cross out the endorsement of its own and of those who endorsed it after they lose it.
Section 971 and ordered to pay it. All of it. The man before endorsing it. He endorsed the draft or transfer to another one of those chips. I have the right to take recourse to the party of which he would be liable under the bill, he already has not.
Section 972 in the event of recourse to the approved part. That party has spent a number of them do not endorse it. May be called to indicate that taking into account the receipt of the bills and called to her. In addition, the bill requires that a certified copy of the bill is correct to the party and the opposition as well. So that he can have recourse in the future.
Section 973 on schedule, which is said to have been the Lewgpgn.
(1) deadline for filing a bill to spend money on it. In later years one has seen.
(2) the period for making objections to non-recognition or non-use of funds.
(3) The deadline for applying to the fund. In the case of a requirement that "Does not have an objection."
You know who would be entitled to take recourse to these other parties endorsing the payer and the person liable. Unless the certification.
Incidentally, if he fails to submit the bill to provide certification within the time limited as specified payer. You know who would lose their right to recourse to the fact that he did not take the money and he does not endorse any of the terms that Payer refers only to detach themselves from the insurance certificate.
The regulations limit the time the bill has to be endorsed. Only endorsed him but would only be taken advantage of the provision.
Section 974 of the bill better. Objection to it. If for some reason which is not necessarily violate the do not obstruct the due date. For the gem. You have to extend the deadline further.
Necessity, which is not bad as they violate them. Who has the endorsement given to the person next to them without delay. The notice shall be specified in the bill. Or identification card to be dated and signed by the holder other than those mentioned. You to enforce the provisions of Section 963.
When necessary, it may violate the end it was down. He must give his approval or payment of bills without delay. If an objection is made up.
If necessary, which is not to violate them. Continue to exist as more than thirty days after bills are due soon. You have the right to any recourse. And if so, to submit bills from. Objection to it. Shall not be required to do so.
The types of bills that spend money on it. Or spend time one could see it later. The thirty day like that recently. You from the day the Lord has given notice which is not necessary to violate. Those who endorse it to the next. Although the deadline for bills to pass. It is treated as such.
Supreme Court in 1783/2551.
The issuance of promissory notes. And its 16 percent interest rate per annum as agreed by Section 911, 968 (1) of Section 985, the law does not place any restrictions on the parties may agree. It is not a loan within the meaning of Act not to exceed the rate of interest at the rate specified in the promissory note at 16 percent per year, it's not the case, the interest rate which would be an offense under the Act and do not require. prohibited by Section 654, according to promissory notes and interest to sue is not void.
Supreme Court in 2569/2551.
R. companies to sell the disputed checks signed by the plaintiff by the endorsement. The plaintiff, who by law. When the bank refused to cash the check. Defendants who are ordered to pay, and Rama, who have endorsed a common liability to the plaintiff under Section 914 and Section 967 and Section 989 of the first paragraph shall be considered as a debtor to do so when the plaintiff. compromise agreement, which is regarded as one of the new debt the plaintiff would be entitled to claim payment for their companies, according to Rama, the compromise agreement. No right to call the company liable for the debt, according to Rama in one settlement. The plaintiff's right to claim against the defendant as a liability to the plaintiff in order to pay them. Debt settlement will put an end to the check. This is because the debt-claim in the case of the plaintiff in a settlement to end.
Supreme Court in 6054/2550.
The Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited (), which pays the bills were signed in, it is certified under Section 927 must be bound to pay the amount certified by the certification body of their compliance. Section 937 of the debtor and the one with the defendant, one of which is payable to the defendant that one is not in a position to be committed before the Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited () under Section 967, paragraph three, so when the Bank of Thailand. Ltd. (PCL) has been paid to the company, Toyota Motor (Thailand) Ltd., which is the honoring of 92 copies to the Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited () is the recourse that the defendant is one who commands. can not afford it. When there is no recourse then. Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited (), it shall have no claim to be transferred to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power in this case is a problem with the power to sue is an issue relating to public order. Even during the discretion of the court. Both defendants waived the issue to this dispute. The two defendants were entitled to raise claims in the appeal under section 225 paragraph two Civil Procedure Code.
Supreme Court in 5477/2550.
Civil Procedure Code Section 4 (1) states that the indictment be presented to the court that the defendant is domiciled in the district court. Or to the court that the case was in court that the defendant is domiciled, in accordance with the provisions of the criminal cycle, or the means to cause the carriage as the source of the plaintiff's argument that the right to sue. According to the complaint of the plaintiff that the defendant ordered to pay out a district, as the case proceeds to reimburse the District has purchased land to the defendant the amount of 140,000 Baht to the district, such as the date when the check payable to Nam. to billing. But the bank refuses to pay the check, even as I was the victim, while in case the bank refuses to pay. Whether the plaintiff was not injured. But when I said I was transferred to the plaintiff in the dispute. By endorsing the settlement check and deliver to the plaintiff. He and the plaintiff shall be entitled to the same district, in order to enforce against the defendant who has already committed before the third paragraph under Section 967 and Section 989, first paragraph, the plaintiff has sued the defendants. the payer to pay the plaintiff a check. The liability of the defendants in the dispute occurred when the bank refuses to pay the place where the check was refused to pay the carriage is indeed the place where born. When the bank refuses to pay the check is in the jurisdiction of the Court. It held that the case was in court. Plaintiff's complaint, the Court has power to all the provisions of that law.
Supreme Court in 4789/2549.
Promissory notes issued by the specified date is September 30, 2540 maturity date of October 31, 2540 using the interest rate per annum BBL MOR +1 on the promissory note the defendant is required to charge interest. And does not specify that the interest from any So the interest rate specified in the promissory note from the date of the ticket, according to Section 911, 968, 985 on October 31, 2540 to date, a defendant does not pay the bills. Shall be deemed to constitute a default by the defendant upon the second paragraph of Section 204 by a creditor does not require prior notice or demand whatsoever. When an assignment of this claim to the plaintiff. Behalf of the plaintiff as assignee of the original creditor has a claim for the value. All existing debt as well as debt of the two defendants.
Supreme Court in 4264/2548.
Check the documentation changed. Cheques made payable to the plaintiff when the defendant does not indicate that the plaintiff in a position to pay. B. The plaintiff is the trustee of the plaintiff as a holder in accordance with the law. When the bank refused to cash the check. As a check by the plaintiff who is injured and has the power to sue on behalf of the plaintiff. Himself without a suffix to the name of the plaintiff as trustee in the case of B. However, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants described checks payable to the plaintiff to pay the debt. Compromise agreement documents filed at the number 1 and 2, which is considered the documents filed as part of a lawsuit. The compromise agreement stated that the defendant sued for payment by check. The plaintiff as the plaintiff is a trustee of the B is considered the plaintiff sued as trustee under the compromise agreement. Attached to the lawsuit as well.
Supreme Court in 7988/2542.
The plaintiff sued the defendants and ordered to pay in exchange for a cash settlement from the plaintiff, but the facts. I agree that both plaintiff and defendant in exchange for money to each other. Fresh from a third party check made payable to the plaintiff by the defendant in the billing. Paid by check, payable to the plaintiff in any way. Thus, the defendant disputed the check to the plaintiff was not an issue for According to the lawsuit in exchange for cash from the plaintiff. The plaintiff, who was not checked by law. I will check out the dispute form and they are in possession of the plaintiff. However, as the holder of the check holder would need to be checked into the hold. Is to do well. When the plaintiff is not a full check by the law. The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the two defendants dispute liability in the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 7336/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant is liable for the debt under the loan or sell the promissory notes. Payment made to the plaintiff. Without action, the defendants are liable for the debt under the promissory note. The defendant asked the court to the defendants, as the issue became a co-defendant. Defendants have denied liability for the fight to be paid by the defendant, the case is a dispute about the debt, according to promissory notes.
The defendants disputed the bank issued promissory notes of the plaintiff to the defendant by aval District is committed to spending bills at the bank by the plaintiff before the date of the next province to be used. The defendant has brought the Bills to a contract for the sale to repay debt. The agreement, if the plaintiff bank in May, according to the bill. Defendant to plead guilty, pay at the rate of 15 percent per year, plus interest to the plaintiff on the promissory notes did not dispute plaintiff's bill. It is because the Court ordered a temporary freeze in case another request. Any of the defendants. The defendant's breach of contract to sell the promissory notes to plaintiff. The defendant shall be liable to pay the disputed bills with interest rates of 15 percent per year under contract to the plaintiff.
Promissory note dispute to the plaintiff if the defendant is aval for promissory notes, payment settlement to the plaintiff, as agreed upon. In the sale of promissory notes. Promissory note dispute that the defendant would have been in possession as the payee and The ticket holder has the right to claim money from the plaintiff and the defendant joined the aval. The issue was also the case when the court sentenced the defendant to pay the promissory notes. Cash settlement to the plaintiff and the case is finally gone. It is money paid to the defendant to the plaintiff under the sale of promissory notes. Obligations under the promissory note, which is the case for the defendant and plaintiff. Take recourse to remove the defendants 1 and 2, under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 940 shall be filed since the date of filing forward. The defendant did not have to pay to the plaintiff's case notes. Interest before the filing of the agreement to sell the promissory notes. When the defendant's breach of contract, bills of sale. The defendant is still liable to pay to the plaintiff. The defendants are liable to pay the bills from the dispute to the plaintiff. Today is the day that the plaintiff can sue, which is considered a right of recourse. So before you sue a defendant's interest is not liable to pay to the plaintiff.
Promissory note dispute is not a matter of interest. The promissory note interest rate. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 968 (2) Section 985 shall have recourse only a 5 percent interest per annum for the two lower courts ruled that the defendants issued a promissory note and Liable for the debt, promissory note interest rate of 7.5 percent per year, it is not lawful. Even if the defendant does not appeal to the Supreme Court But this is about the power to sue, a legal issue arises. With public order. Supreme Court lifted a correct diagnosis and correct the execution. The Civil Section 142
the Supreme Court to 64/2537.
The plaintiff is licensed by the Ministry of Finance to fund the business. While the plaintiff by the defendant borrowed money from bank notes to the plaintiff. Thailand, which plaintiff is entitled to interest from customers in rates. 18.5 percent per year promissory notes issued to the plaintiff, defendant, two requirements that interest them. 18 and 18.5 percent per year, respectively. It is not stated that the interest from any So the interest rate specified in the promissory note, both of these. From the date of the ticket under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 911 968 695 when the interest rates by the legal bills. The defendant said the money due the plaintiff, who is at fault, it has the right idea. The rate of payments under the promissory note until paid. Completed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, first paragraph.
Supreme Court to 935/2534.
The plaintiff sued the defendants both jointly issued the bills of exchange and sell them to the plaintiff. The plaintiff charged the bill does not. The plaintiff asked the defendant to pay the bills, both with interest at a rate of 17.5 percent per year as agreed with the plaintiff, it is understandable that the interest in Such a high rate under the bill for it. The end of the plaintiff filed a copy of the draft agreement for the sale of two of the defendants sued by the plaintiff did not obscure The plaintiff filed a breach of contract sales force bills. Not sue to enforce the provisions of the money is coming into force of Section 963 and 973 is not so. The plaintiff sued the defendant shall have the power and without notice to not use the money to the defendant two days before the plaintiff sued the defendant in four of the second contract to sell the bills. Interest rates must be based on the agreed case 2 will be at the rate of 5 percent per year under Section 968 (2) the defendant's breach of contract sales at the two bills. The plaintiff claims the defendant to comply with two laws that do not have a specific age. The age of 10 years.
Supreme Court to 935/2534.
The plaintiff sued the defendants to the bill of sale to the plaintiff and the defendant charged accordingly. Bill did not. The defendant paid the bill with interest at a rate of 17.5 percent per year, as agreed, it is understandable that such an interest. Sales contracts, bills and the filing of the plaintiff to attach a copy of the contract sales to come up with money even when the plaintiff filed a lecture honoring contracts or bills of sale. The plaintiff sued, it is evident that the condition of the plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to comply. Sales contracts, bills and asked to enforce the contract. The plaintiff sued the law. A. The plaintiffs are not authorized to sell the bank branch manager, plaintiff, the plaintiff's bills. A. The plaintiff's attorney to prosecute on the discounting of such bills. The plaintiff has ratified the trade bill to reduce it. The plaintiff filed a breach of contract sales force bills. No action required by the bill. I do not recall notice to not use the money to the defendant within four days, according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 963 and the interest rate shall be as agreed. Than 5 percent per year under Section 968 (2) sales contracts, bills, no law requires a specific age. The age of 10 years.
Supreme Court in 3915/2533.
Check out the defendant pay the plaintiff to hire tractors and seven installments at the bank refused to cash the check at all. The defendant has paid the outstanding payment by check to the dispute to the plaintiff. But the bank refuses to pay by check another matter. The plaintiff has terminated the contract. I break the lease since both parties check payable to the defendant. Prior to the plaintiff's termination. It is the lease that the plaintiff had already been paid by check instead of cash. I need to hire the plaintiff had not been paid and is overdue. The settlement will be paid out because the bank refuses to pay. Debt does not hold the check until the check is already spent. Defendant is liable for the debt in dispute. When the plaintiff's rights to sell the checks to the bank. Bank bill by check and the plaintiff did not have the money to pay to the bank the check is returned back to the plaintiff sued the defendant shall be entitled to payment by check to both parties.
Supreme Court in 1162/2533.
Check, cross out the words "or bearer" on the left front of the check, and stamped the letter said. "A / C, the transfer of Li Yi" (A/C PAYEEONLY) transferable by check. The payee must be taken into account. If they can transfer to others only by their shape and effect the transfer of shares. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, the second paragraph of Section 917 and Section 989 provisions. Which must be made in writing to complete. And will raise up against third persons only upon notice in writing to the transfer. Debtor or the debtor agrees in writing to the transfer, so the three defendants who entered into a compromise in the dispute are willing to pay the plaintiff a check for dispute and the court allowed the case to it. When the plaintiff received in settlement of the case is transferred to the defendant a second payer to a book, or one of the two defendants have consented in writing to the assignment. He is not in dispute that the plaintiff will have recourse to the second defendant, a payer, a message similar to one that is transferable, the second defendant was not liable to reimburse the plaintiff in the dispute.
Supreme Court in 1416/2521.
Law is not forced to take a foreign language translation to ensure the accuracy of any successor to the defendant that the translation is not accurate or inaccurate, however, the defendant would have liked. The debate or the correct translation.
The payer and the plaintiff when the defendant is liable to pay, which has endorsed the bill. I refused to pay the money. The bill was considered by taking a representative payee and bill them accordingly. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 970, therefore the plaintiff is entitled to the honor and interest on the amount of the charge. Rate of five percent per year from the date of payment to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 969.
Was honored for a period of debt repayment, then the plaintiff will not be such a demand.
