Section 764 on the enforcement of the pledge. The pledge is a written notice to the debtor before that. The debt and within a reasonable time in which notice is given.
If the debtor fails to comply with the notice. The pledge of love to take a pledge to sell the property. But the auction.
The pledge shall be pledged to the letter of notice of the time and place of the auction as well.
Section 765 can not be told first. The pledge is a pledge of property to be sold on a debt owed overtime a month, but to do so.
Section 766 if the pledge of bills. You shall pledge to keep the bills paid by the due date. Does not require prior notice.
Section 767 on the pledge of the net amount of money. He pledged that the recipient must be allocated to debt payment and completed. And if there is money to be returned to the pledge. Or to persons who should have the money.
If less than the amount owed. That the debtor will still have to get used to the lack of them.
Section 768 if the property pledged to secure a debt, but one thing only. He pledged that the recipient can choose anything from selling any assets. But they will sell more than necessary for the exercise of their money, it has not.
Supreme Court in 5099/2548.
Bills pledged as security for debts the defendant to the plaintiff. The pledge by the plaintiff, who has been endorsed and accepted bills of exchange. In possession under Section 926 and 766, when a pledge to endorse the bill. He shall exercise all due, but the total And the pledge, the bill would have the right to charge according to the maturity. The pledge is not required to notify the plaintiff is entitled to charge the bills that are due to less money. The first payment of the defendant by the plaintiff is not required to notify the defendant that a prior pledge.
In the case of property pledged by the general. If the pledge is a pledge to enforce a written notice to the debtor to pay. Debt and in a reasonable period of notice is given to the first. If the debtor fails to comply with a notice to the property pledged to put it like that. Loan auctions by the Section 764 paragraphs one and two. If an agreement to manage the property as the other provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Such an agreement would not be complete under Section 756, and even in the case of forced liquidation of the pledge is a pledge by the Bill. Assurance that debt. The honor pledge has the right to charge them without notice. Before any enforcement of the pledge. But the draft bill by the due date for payment under Section 766 of the plaintiff to enforce payment of the bills that are pledged. To redemption prior to maturity by the payment of the bill. Not with the above-mentioned provisions of law. The redemption or receive payment under the bill before the due date of payment to the payer would prefer not to pay until the due date. But this case is not honoring honoring to the plaintiff, with reductions to the money. The payer can benefit from the discounts. The plaintiff received a benefit payment, but the defendant is a party have benefited from the adoption of the redemption proceeds from ticket Redeemed before the maturity date is less than the amount by which the net debt was less a defendant would have been damaged by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the money was missing. Or withholding of payments to be accurate.
Supreme Court in 5603/2544.
The pledge agreement pledging to help the party machinery. The debtor's assets are pledged to maintain accounts of the use. Of the assets pledged in the operation of their time. This machine is a pledge of orders coming in from abroad to produce goods. Sales revenue and the money to pay off the pledge is a pledge of machinery. Fast and convenient way to mortgage Demonstrate the intent of the debtor to use the machinery to produce goods. Their sole benefit. Although there is agreement that the pledge agreement. The pawns are allowed to use a machine that is not considered a pledge. Machine back into the possession of the pledge that it is a promise. To avoid the law. In interpreting the intent is to focus the intent than the actual mean Idioms letters under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 171, when the real intent of the debtor to take advantage of the machine. Assets to pledge. To the objection that a machine which is the pledge to allow the debtor to use pledged assets would be allowed to regain possession of property pledged as loan processing. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 769 (2) The right to pledge their opposition to a settlement so that an end to the dispute are not entitled to payment of creditors by the equipment under the pledge agreement. Bankruptcy Law.
Supreme Court in 9465/2544.
The pledge does not bind the pledge to be the only one pawn. The pledge may be entitled to enforce the pledge of a debt waiver of preferential rights of ordinary people. Pledge over the assets would be pledged. Not an exercise in bad faith.
Supreme Court in 2517/2534.
The petitioner, a defendant who pledge to the pledge of the rental. Pledged assets. Would be allowed to return to the possession of the property pledged as pawns. Meaning of Section 769 (2) of the Civil and Commercial Code. I pledge to suspend the right of the petitioner pursuant to a pledge not to request that the creditors of the execution. Section 287 can be considered pricey.
Supreme Court in 3599/2530.
The defendant entered into a loan of 200,000, with the plaintiff. As guarantor, and that's wrong, and the debtor. Delivering a fixed amount of $ 500,000 pledged as collateral as well. Article 9 states that the contract of guarantee in case the borrower defaults on ... The borrower has the right to remove from sale of property pledged to ... Without notice. If not, pay. The guarantee would apply to the full. In the record to endorse the pledge of a deposit. Is that when the due time for payment. If the debtor has a debt I owe much. The bank pledged to allow the plaintiff the pledge after repayment of deposits and the payment of this pledge. Interest shall be recorded until the endorsement is a pledge of such notice. Terms of the agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce payment of the pledged property only as long as possible. That the plaintiff had not forced liquidation of assets pledged. Recover the debt under which the defendant made to plaintiff, it still exists. The plaintiff sued to enforce the contractual right to recover it without having to enforce the pledge.
Supreme Court in 3697/2528.
The plaintiff (the pledge), shall be entitled to redeem the property pledged as always, as long as the defendant (the pledge) to Not enforce the pledge. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had no right to redeem the expiration of the contract and no. Act, which stipulates that if forced to pledge. The pledge has the right to redeem after the expiration of the redemption of the contract. That there are provisions that Agreement before the loan due if the recipient does not repay a loan. Assets pledged or otherwise manage the property in addition provisions. But with the enforcement of the pledge. Under the agreement is not perfect. 756 of the Civil and Commercial Code.
Supreme Court in 5099/2548.
In the case of property pledged by the general. If the pledge is a pledge to enforce a written notice to the debtor to pay. Debt and in a reasonable period of notice is given to the first. If the debtor fails to comply with a notice to the property pledged to put it like that. Loan auctions by the Section 764 paragraphs one and two. If an agreement to manage the property as the other provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Such an agreement would not be complete under Section 756, and even in the case of forced liquidation of the pledge is a pledge by the Bill. Assurance that debt. The honor pledge has the right to charge them without notice. Before any enforcement of the pledge. But the draft bill by the due date for payment under Section 766 of the plaintiff to enforce payment of the bills that are pledged. To redemption prior to maturity by the payment of the bill. Not with the above-mentioned provisions of law. The redemption or receive payment under the bill before the due date of payment to the payer would prefer not to pay until the due date. But this case is not honoring honoring to the plaintiff, with reductions to the money. The payer can benefit from the discounts. The plaintiff received a benefit payment, but the defendant is a party have benefited from the adoption of the redemption proceeds from ticket Redeemed before the maturity date is less than the amount by which the net debt was less a defendant would have been damaged by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the money was missing. Or withholding of payments to be accurate.
Supreme Court to 461/2530.
The defendant issued promissory notes to plaintiff. Court endorsed the promissory note pledged to the defendant in order to guarantee the debt. A. The application for purchase of shares. Order the defendant traded on the Stock Exchange of Thailand and Myanmar, and the District. A debt for equity on the other. The plaintiff has no claim on the promissory notes from the defendant or the defendant's claim. Used by them.
Supreme Court in 1114/2533.
Accused the two contracts pledged shares as security for debts of the defendant No. 1 to the plaintiff a total of 4 to the pledge of 3 to determine the amount of pledged collateral for another one to pledge shares, 1,000 shares can not enter the insurance amount of the contract, 3 set. that "a pledge to allow the waiver of repayment of the loan receivable. And a pledge to accept it as a co-debtor stay "means just that. If the loan applicant to pay the defendant No. 1 and accused No. 2 is liable to the defendant to a residence and accused No. 2 to the wrong accounts and the amount of assets to pledge as security for debt, only to extend the amount of money. to limit the liability from a contract, Article 5 stipulates that "if the net proceeds of sale of assets pledged under the loan principal and interest. Agree to pay the outstanding loan amount to the other end. If the net proceeds of sales of assets pledged under the pledge of how much. The pledge to allow a deduction for any debt owed by the debtor to pledge that if there is money remaining. The pledge will be refunded to those who pledge to "This agreement is an indication that the second defendant is liable for property to pledge and pay the full amount. Despite the pledge agreement does not limit the meaning is just that. When forced to pledge assets to pledge, then proceeds to sell the property. I pay the debt. Unless you have money left to pay back the two defendants are not parties to the pledge would be liable to the debtor's debt. All other assets pledged. To interpret the intent of the contract. A rough translation without defendant appealed to witnesses to be traced need not resolve the appeal. Because the law does not force them to do so.
Supreme Court to 490/2502.
Plaintiff and the defendant a loan agreement with the message that recovery. Tacoma defendant has pledged on a loan contract, then the plaintiff has consented to the cattle. Returned to the possession of the defendant, even though the defendant will ever be brought back to the plaintiff, but occasionally returned to the defendant and the plaintiff agrees to this. The defendant has the cattle constitutes a guarantee of payment within the meaning of the pledge. According to Penal Code Section 349 did not.
If the debtor fails to comply with the notice. The pledge of love to take a pledge to sell the property. But the auction.
The pledge shall be pledged to the letter of notice of the time and place of the auction as well.
Section 765 can not be told first. The pledge is a pledge of property to be sold on a debt owed overtime a month, but to do so.
Section 766 if the pledge of bills. You shall pledge to keep the bills paid by the due date. Does not require prior notice.
Section 767 on the pledge of the net amount of money. He pledged that the recipient must be allocated to debt payment and completed. And if there is money to be returned to the pledge. Or to persons who should have the money.
If less than the amount owed. That the debtor will still have to get used to the lack of them.
Section 768 if the property pledged to secure a debt, but one thing only. He pledged that the recipient can choose anything from selling any assets. But they will sell more than necessary for the exercise of their money, it has not.
Supreme Court in 5099/2548.
Bills pledged as security for debts the defendant to the plaintiff. The pledge by the plaintiff, who has been endorsed and accepted bills of exchange. In possession under Section 926 and 766, when a pledge to endorse the bill. He shall exercise all due, but the total And the pledge, the bill would have the right to charge according to the maturity. The pledge is not required to notify the plaintiff is entitled to charge the bills that are due to less money. The first payment of the defendant by the plaintiff is not required to notify the defendant that a prior pledge.
In the case of property pledged by the general. If the pledge is a pledge to enforce a written notice to the debtor to pay. Debt and in a reasonable period of notice is given to the first. If the debtor fails to comply with a notice to the property pledged to put it like that. Loan auctions by the Section 764 paragraphs one and two. If an agreement to manage the property as the other provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Such an agreement would not be complete under Section 756, and even in the case of forced liquidation of the pledge is a pledge by the Bill. Assurance that debt. The honor pledge has the right to charge them without notice. Before any enforcement of the pledge. But the draft bill by the due date for payment under Section 766 of the plaintiff to enforce payment of the bills that are pledged. To redemption prior to maturity by the payment of the bill. Not with the above-mentioned provisions of law. The redemption or receive payment under the bill before the due date of payment to the payer would prefer not to pay until the due date. But this case is not honoring honoring to the plaintiff, with reductions to the money. The payer can benefit from the discounts. The plaintiff received a benefit payment, but the defendant is a party have benefited from the adoption of the redemption proceeds from ticket Redeemed before the maturity date is less than the amount by which the net debt was less a defendant would have been damaged by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the money was missing. Or withholding of payments to be accurate.
Supreme Court in 5603/2544.
The pledge agreement pledging to help the party machinery. The debtor's assets are pledged to maintain accounts of the use. Of the assets pledged in the operation of their time. This machine is a pledge of orders coming in from abroad to produce goods. Sales revenue and the money to pay off the pledge is a pledge of machinery. Fast and convenient way to mortgage Demonstrate the intent of the debtor to use the machinery to produce goods. Their sole benefit. Although there is agreement that the pledge agreement. The pawns are allowed to use a machine that is not considered a pledge. Machine back into the possession of the pledge that it is a promise. To avoid the law. In interpreting the intent is to focus the intent than the actual mean Idioms letters under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 171, when the real intent of the debtor to take advantage of the machine. Assets to pledge. To the objection that a machine which is the pledge to allow the debtor to use pledged assets would be allowed to regain possession of property pledged as loan processing. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 769 (2) The right to pledge their opposition to a settlement so that an end to the dispute are not entitled to payment of creditors by the equipment under the pledge agreement. Bankruptcy Law.
Supreme Court in 9465/2544.
The pledge does not bind the pledge to be the only one pawn. The pledge may be entitled to enforce the pledge of a debt waiver of preferential rights of ordinary people. Pledge over the assets would be pledged. Not an exercise in bad faith.
Supreme Court in 2517/2534.
The petitioner, a defendant who pledge to the pledge of the rental. Pledged assets. Would be allowed to return to the possession of the property pledged as pawns. Meaning of Section 769 (2) of the Civil and Commercial Code. I pledge to suspend the right of the petitioner pursuant to a pledge not to request that the creditors of the execution. Section 287 can be considered pricey.
Supreme Court in 3599/2530.
The defendant entered into a loan of 200,000, with the plaintiff. As guarantor, and that's wrong, and the debtor. Delivering a fixed amount of $ 500,000 pledged as collateral as well. Article 9 states that the contract of guarantee in case the borrower defaults on ... The borrower has the right to remove from sale of property pledged to ... Without notice. If not, pay. The guarantee would apply to the full. In the record to endorse the pledge of a deposit. Is that when the due time for payment. If the debtor has a debt I owe much. The bank pledged to allow the plaintiff the pledge after repayment of deposits and the payment of this pledge. Interest shall be recorded until the endorsement is a pledge of such notice. Terms of the agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to enforce payment of the pledged property only as long as possible. That the plaintiff had not forced liquidation of assets pledged. Recover the debt under which the defendant made to plaintiff, it still exists. The plaintiff sued to enforce the contractual right to recover it without having to enforce the pledge.
Supreme Court in 3697/2528.
The plaintiff (the pledge), shall be entitled to redeem the property pledged as always, as long as the defendant (the pledge) to Not enforce the pledge. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had no right to redeem the expiration of the contract and no. Act, which stipulates that if forced to pledge. The pledge has the right to redeem after the expiration of the redemption of the contract. That there are provisions that Agreement before the loan due if the recipient does not repay a loan. Assets pledged or otherwise manage the property in addition provisions. But with the enforcement of the pledge. Under the agreement is not perfect. 756 of the Civil and Commercial Code.
Supreme Court in 5099/2548.
In the case of property pledged by the general. If the pledge is a pledge to enforce a written notice to the debtor to pay. Debt and in a reasonable period of notice is given to the first. If the debtor fails to comply with a notice to the property pledged to put it like that. Loan auctions by the Section 764 paragraphs one and two. If an agreement to manage the property as the other provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Such an agreement would not be complete under Section 756, and even in the case of forced liquidation of the pledge is a pledge by the Bill. Assurance that debt. The honor pledge has the right to charge them without notice. Before any enforcement of the pledge. But the draft bill by the due date for payment under Section 766 of the plaintiff to enforce payment of the bills that are pledged. To redemption prior to maturity by the payment of the bill. Not with the above-mentioned provisions of law. The redemption or receive payment under the bill before the due date of payment to the payer would prefer not to pay until the due date. But this case is not honoring honoring to the plaintiff, with reductions to the money. The payer can benefit from the discounts. The plaintiff received a benefit payment, but the defendant is a party have benefited from the adoption of the redemption proceeds from ticket Redeemed before the maturity date is less than the amount by which the net debt was less a defendant would have been damaged by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the money was missing. Or withholding of payments to be accurate.
Supreme Court to 461/2530.
The defendant issued promissory notes to plaintiff. Court endorsed the promissory note pledged to the defendant in order to guarantee the debt. A. The application for purchase of shares. Order the defendant traded on the Stock Exchange of Thailand and Myanmar, and the District. A debt for equity on the other. The plaintiff has no claim on the promissory notes from the defendant or the defendant's claim. Used by them.
Supreme Court in 1114/2533.
Accused the two contracts pledged shares as security for debts of the defendant No. 1 to the plaintiff a total of 4 to the pledge of 3 to determine the amount of pledged collateral for another one to pledge shares, 1,000 shares can not enter the insurance amount of the contract, 3 set. that "a pledge to allow the waiver of repayment of the loan receivable. And a pledge to accept it as a co-debtor stay "means just that. If the loan applicant to pay the defendant No. 1 and accused No. 2 is liable to the defendant to a residence and accused No. 2 to the wrong accounts and the amount of assets to pledge as security for debt, only to extend the amount of money. to limit the liability from a contract, Article 5 stipulates that "if the net proceeds of sale of assets pledged under the loan principal and interest. Agree to pay the outstanding loan amount to the other end. If the net proceeds of sales of assets pledged under the pledge of how much. The pledge to allow a deduction for any debt owed by the debtor to pledge that if there is money remaining. The pledge will be refunded to those who pledge to "This agreement is an indication that the second defendant is liable for property to pledge and pay the full amount. Despite the pledge agreement does not limit the meaning is just that. When forced to pledge assets to pledge, then proceeds to sell the property. I pay the debt. Unless you have money left to pay back the two defendants are not parties to the pledge would be liable to the debtor's debt. All other assets pledged. To interpret the intent of the contract. A rough translation without defendant appealed to witnesses to be traced need not resolve the appeal. Because the law does not force them to do so.
Supreme Court to 490/2502.
Plaintiff and the defendant a loan agreement with the message that recovery. Tacoma defendant has pledged on a loan contract, then the plaintiff has consented to the cattle. Returned to the possession of the defendant, even though the defendant will ever be brought back to the plaintiff, but occasionally returned to the defendant and the plaintiff agrees to this. The defendant has the cattle constitutes a guarantee of payment within the meaning of the pledge. According to Penal Code Section 349 did not.
