Section 883 the contract of carriage. Indeed for all the workers, which may be caused to the carrier during transport from the get go. It was delivered to the consignee. And the amount of compensation that Be determined by that of the transport will be available at the district and the transmission.
Section 884 if the shipment was insured when it is in the process of submission to you that the insurance of the count, as well as the price of the place and time that the carrier has been to increase the freight forwarder to. The place of delivery to the consignee. On the other costs due to the transmission of those as well.
Profits will be a time when delivery of it. It will be included in the insurance information when you have expressly agreed otherwise.
Section 885 of the contract of carriage. Although the transport is stopped, momentarily interrupted or changed or are changing the way transportation, either by necessity during the journey to it. I promise you that it shall remain valid. Unless otherwise specified in the contract.
Section 886 of the carriage of the insurance policy. In addition to those set forth in Section 867 shall contain the increase, as the following.
(1) the physical and transport.
(2) Name or brand of the carrier.
(3) where the pick up and delivery.
(4) the duration of carriage, but there is.
Supreme Court in 4709/2542.
Transportation system cy / cy origin of the shipment of goods to be transported by cargo. Goods entering into the incubator at the warehouse of the shipment. The cargo was then delivered to the carrier. When transporting cargo to its destination and the consignee is to open the container. The warehouse of the consignee of the goods themselves. The delivery of the defendant. 1, provided that the receiving facility. Tokyo's failure to deliver in Bangkok cyp. The dispute in the transport of goods from a defendant who receives the cargo from the company. At the port in Tokyo. Japan Through Bangkok Port, the company was the recipient of containers to check the stock itself. If your refrigerator door seals and seal products in the normal state, it will show that Product is not lost while in the care of the carrier defendants, the defendant, a shipper would be liable in case of disputed items in the closet. The delivery of the goods lost, but a defendant is issued to the sender that. Container and container rights that the plaintiff insurance branded a sealed cabinet doors. Item no. H M O L-defendants had transported 27,209 containers arrive at the Bangkok Port. The container has a seal sealing the enclosure door is numbered SP C 051 682, which is not apparent why the seal seals the door cargo specified in the consignment note was changed from the original, so that the defendant's effort to delivery to the defendant. 1 when the container. Although the number of containers. But does not indicate that the door seals, container seals, is any number. If it is still unclear whether the cargo door seal seal numbers. H. SM AOL SP No. 27209 was changed to 051 682 C before or after the defendant's delivery of cargo from the port of Singapore. Cargo door was opened during shipment from the port of Tokyo. Any one time prior to the Bangkok Port and disputes that the plaintiff had guaranteed. Disasters, it has lost its loss while goods are in the care of the defendant and the defendant's first carrier to a defendant and the defendant to be responsible for the disappearance of such disputes. Carriage of goods by Sea Act 2534 Section 3 defines "shipping container" means secondary wood products, container, or anything else that looks like the same container or support. The total unit shipments of multiple units together for the benefit of maritime transport and the definition. "Transport unit" means a unit of the maritime transport, which is one And each unit may be carried alone as a piece of tank bags, roll wrap, pack and crate them or the other, so the word "cabinet" is an example of such a definition. It means a container or a container for a small difference. Of containers which are larger and can hold containers for the packaging size. Such a large number of small to facilitate moving the container in which the container is the container shipping industry. The shipping container as defined in Section 3 of the Constitution to express it. Cabinet or container that is not meaningful, as well as transport and container transport. When the cargo transport unit is a unit may not be the liability of a defendant and the defendant was not exceeding 10,000 baht.
Supreme Court in 4449/2541.
Insurance for the carriage of a particular method which is different from general insurance. Because the price of the insurance or Equity for the insurance in the carriage under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 884, paragraph one does not mean just the price of the product itself. But may also include. Freight and other expenses as the case with Envelope printer dispute with C & F of 71,681 pounds Sterling. The price of the plaintiff, the petitioner must have insurance to 78,849 pounds Sterling. When it is determined that the price of insurance is 110 percent of the price. Show that the additional 10 per cent of the price is at a total cost of the insurance. This is normal practice for insurance for the goods. The sum of 187,610 baht, the plaintiff called. "Claims" is a 10 per cent of the price of 1,876,100 baht, to a printer or listen to dispute the claims that it is. The cost of insurance is considered part of the section to which the petitioner must be insured by the plaintiff under section 884 paragraph one above.
Supreme Court in 3343/2541.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 883, and casualty insurance purposes to cover everything that may be. Happened to the shipment. During the period from the carrier until it has been delivered to the consignee. This is to protect those who risk the loss or damage. All kinds of products because it appears that the insurance product. Insurance claimant to the defendant. 2 has shipped to Uruguay. Its destination safely. Without getting lost or damaged goods and the buyer has been completed. The carrier will be delivered to the buyer. The buyer does not pay the price to the bank as the consignee prior to the agreement. Whether the plaintiff could not be considered to be the case that the insured goods are lost or Under the terms of the policy or the second defendant to the plaintiff and the defendant is liable to a broker, suggest that it is only the plaintiff against the defendant, the two enter into a contract when the plaintiff obtained an insurance policy which named as defendants the two insurers. Plaintiffs and defendants agree to pay 2, holding that defendant. One can say the name of the other party to know one another under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 848, then a defendant will not be liable to the plaintiff as well.
Supreme Court in 5052/2539.
The plaintiff's insurance policy with the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. Expressly stated that the maritime insurance companies have a plaintiff. Insurance is the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand A cargo ship, the Far East Marine insurance claims under this policy will be paid to the City - the city. At the end of the policy by the plaintiff and a defendant who signed for and on behalf of users. Reinsurance is the plaintiff. In addition, each person also stated that the first signature. Chairman of the Board. The second signature. Managing director And signature of the third. Marine Manager. It is clear that the plaintiff's expressed as a marine insurer and the policy to find out the policy for the plaintiff in a personal capacity and not signed. The seal of the plaintiff fails to find the facts contained in the policy. Such changes are not clear. The plaintiff accepted the policy, such a policy fully effective. Plaintiff's insurance, the insurer issued to the Electricity Generating Authority of the country. Thai spouse.
Supreme Court in 2501/2526.
The plaintiff sued the defendants jointly liable for damages due to shipping Thor has insurance to the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that the damage to the T. I was given the rights of creditors called for the defendants jointly liable for the plaintiff. The case against the defendant that the defendant was a contract to deliver goods to T. T. defendant not guilty to the company. Although the plaintiff was not entitled to inherit the power to sue the defendant, the case is a dispute about power issues, the plaintiff sued the defendants hired carriage. Selling to a T. T.
The plaintiff has sued. It relies primarily on the six defendants were convicted as a common carrier. The damage caused by shipping. He noted that the six defendants as the employer and the contractor to receive the shipment. And working together in informal groups wishing to engage in the delivery of goods to the T. The six defendants are jointly responsible for handling and transporting the material to do it. The six defendants liable under the contract of carriage. The defendant stated that the three are employed and acting in the employ of the defendant at first does not mean that the three defendants jointly liable for the plaintiff's employer and the employee. And the plaintiff cited the negligence of the defendant is to be provided by the defendant. Six liability under the contract of carriage. Not be liable for the infringement. Thus, the Court addressed the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 616 was adapted to the case of three defendants who are sued for use as a diagnostic field is unthinkable.
Insurance products, this policy indicates that even under the guarantee. Flights from Champaign to Chicago. Guatemala. To Bangkok It has to be considered in accordance with the terms set forth on the back of the contract or policy. Insurance on such terms with that. Insurance comes into force starting from the time the goods leave the warehouse or place. Storage to transport. And due to international shipping lines, as usual. And ends when delivered to the warehouse at the destination specified in the policy such as this. The liability of the defendant's insurer will terminate only upon delivery. Goods to the warehouse of Thor, the recipients.
Although most companies are not experts of the court. But the profession about the product that has been damaged. As a Marine. It said company officials, the damage and make a report. The Managing Director of the Company signed a compliance audit. Damage over a period of 11 years after the court hearing the testimony of such reports. I to calculate the damage.
Section 884 if the shipment was insured when it is in the process of submission to you that the insurance of the count, as well as the price of the place and time that the carrier has been to increase the freight forwarder to. The place of delivery to the consignee. On the other costs due to the transmission of those as well.
Profits will be a time when delivery of it. It will be included in the insurance information when you have expressly agreed otherwise.
Section 885 of the contract of carriage. Although the transport is stopped, momentarily interrupted or changed or are changing the way transportation, either by necessity during the journey to it. I promise you that it shall remain valid. Unless otherwise specified in the contract.
Section 886 of the carriage of the insurance policy. In addition to those set forth in Section 867 shall contain the increase, as the following.
(1) the physical and transport.
(2) Name or brand of the carrier.
(3) where the pick up and delivery.
(4) the duration of carriage, but there is.
Supreme Court in 4709/2542.
Transportation system cy / cy origin of the shipment of goods to be transported by cargo. Goods entering into the incubator at the warehouse of the shipment. The cargo was then delivered to the carrier. When transporting cargo to its destination and the consignee is to open the container. The warehouse of the consignee of the goods themselves. The delivery of the defendant. 1, provided that the receiving facility. Tokyo's failure to deliver in Bangkok cyp. The dispute in the transport of goods from a defendant who receives the cargo from the company. At the port in Tokyo. Japan Through Bangkok Port, the company was the recipient of containers to check the stock itself. If your refrigerator door seals and seal products in the normal state, it will show that Product is not lost while in the care of the carrier defendants, the defendant, a shipper would be liable in case of disputed items in the closet. The delivery of the goods lost, but a defendant is issued to the sender that. Container and container rights that the plaintiff insurance branded a sealed cabinet doors. Item no. H M O L-defendants had transported 27,209 containers arrive at the Bangkok Port. The container has a seal sealing the enclosure door is numbered SP C 051 682, which is not apparent why the seal seals the door cargo specified in the consignment note was changed from the original, so that the defendant's effort to delivery to the defendant. 1 when the container. Although the number of containers. But does not indicate that the door seals, container seals, is any number. If it is still unclear whether the cargo door seal seal numbers. H. SM AOL SP No. 27209 was changed to 051 682 C before or after the defendant's delivery of cargo from the port of Singapore. Cargo door was opened during shipment from the port of Tokyo. Any one time prior to the Bangkok Port and disputes that the plaintiff had guaranteed. Disasters, it has lost its loss while goods are in the care of the defendant and the defendant's first carrier to a defendant and the defendant to be responsible for the disappearance of such disputes. Carriage of goods by Sea Act 2534 Section 3 defines "shipping container" means secondary wood products, container, or anything else that looks like the same container or support. The total unit shipments of multiple units together for the benefit of maritime transport and the definition. "Transport unit" means a unit of the maritime transport, which is one And each unit may be carried alone as a piece of tank bags, roll wrap, pack and crate them or the other, so the word "cabinet" is an example of such a definition. It means a container or a container for a small difference. Of containers which are larger and can hold containers for the packaging size. Such a large number of small to facilitate moving the container in which the container is the container shipping industry. The shipping container as defined in Section 3 of the Constitution to express it. Cabinet or container that is not meaningful, as well as transport and container transport. When the cargo transport unit is a unit may not be the liability of a defendant and the defendant was not exceeding 10,000 baht.
Supreme Court in 4449/2541.
Insurance for the carriage of a particular method which is different from general insurance. Because the price of the insurance or Equity for the insurance in the carriage under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 884, paragraph one does not mean just the price of the product itself. But may also include. Freight and other expenses as the case with Envelope printer dispute with C & F of 71,681 pounds Sterling. The price of the plaintiff, the petitioner must have insurance to 78,849 pounds Sterling. When it is determined that the price of insurance is 110 percent of the price. Show that the additional 10 per cent of the price is at a total cost of the insurance. This is normal practice for insurance for the goods. The sum of 187,610 baht, the plaintiff called. "Claims" is a 10 per cent of the price of 1,876,100 baht, to a printer or listen to dispute the claims that it is. The cost of insurance is considered part of the section to which the petitioner must be insured by the plaintiff under section 884 paragraph one above.
Supreme Court in 3343/2541.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 883, and casualty insurance purposes to cover everything that may be. Happened to the shipment. During the period from the carrier until it has been delivered to the consignee. This is to protect those who risk the loss or damage. All kinds of products because it appears that the insurance product. Insurance claimant to the defendant. 2 has shipped to Uruguay. Its destination safely. Without getting lost or damaged goods and the buyer has been completed. The carrier will be delivered to the buyer. The buyer does not pay the price to the bank as the consignee prior to the agreement. Whether the plaintiff could not be considered to be the case that the insured goods are lost or Under the terms of the policy or the second defendant to the plaintiff and the defendant is liable to a broker, suggest that it is only the plaintiff against the defendant, the two enter into a contract when the plaintiff obtained an insurance policy which named as defendants the two insurers. Plaintiffs and defendants agree to pay 2, holding that defendant. One can say the name of the other party to know one another under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 848, then a defendant will not be liable to the plaintiff as well.
Supreme Court in 5052/2539.
The plaintiff's insurance policy with the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. Expressly stated that the maritime insurance companies have a plaintiff. Insurance is the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand A cargo ship, the Far East Marine insurance claims under this policy will be paid to the City - the city. At the end of the policy by the plaintiff and a defendant who signed for and on behalf of users. Reinsurance is the plaintiff. In addition, each person also stated that the first signature. Chairman of the Board. The second signature. Managing director And signature of the third. Marine Manager. It is clear that the plaintiff's expressed as a marine insurer and the policy to find out the policy for the plaintiff in a personal capacity and not signed. The seal of the plaintiff fails to find the facts contained in the policy. Such changes are not clear. The plaintiff accepted the policy, such a policy fully effective. Plaintiff's insurance, the insurer issued to the Electricity Generating Authority of the country. Thai spouse.
Supreme Court in 2501/2526.
The plaintiff sued the defendants jointly liable for damages due to shipping Thor has insurance to the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that the damage to the T. I was given the rights of creditors called for the defendants jointly liable for the plaintiff. The case against the defendant that the defendant was a contract to deliver goods to T. T. defendant not guilty to the company. Although the plaintiff was not entitled to inherit the power to sue the defendant, the case is a dispute about power issues, the plaintiff sued the defendants hired carriage. Selling to a T. T.
The plaintiff has sued. It relies primarily on the six defendants were convicted as a common carrier. The damage caused by shipping. He noted that the six defendants as the employer and the contractor to receive the shipment. And working together in informal groups wishing to engage in the delivery of goods to the T. The six defendants are jointly responsible for handling and transporting the material to do it. The six defendants liable under the contract of carriage. The defendant stated that the three are employed and acting in the employ of the defendant at first does not mean that the three defendants jointly liable for the plaintiff's employer and the employee. And the plaintiff cited the negligence of the defendant is to be provided by the defendant. Six liability under the contract of carriage. Not be liable for the infringement. Thus, the Court addressed the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 616 was adapted to the case of three defendants who are sued for use as a diagnostic field is unthinkable.
Insurance products, this policy indicates that even under the guarantee. Flights from Champaign to Chicago. Guatemala. To Bangkok It has to be considered in accordance with the terms set forth on the back of the contract or policy. Insurance on such terms with that. Insurance comes into force starting from the time the goods leave the warehouse or place. Storage to transport. And due to international shipping lines, as usual. And ends when delivered to the warehouse at the destination specified in the policy such as this. The liability of the defendant's insurer will terminate only upon delivery. Goods to the warehouse of Thor, the recipients.
Although most companies are not experts of the court. But the profession about the product that has been damaged. As a Marine. It said company officials, the damage and make a report. The Managing Director of the Company signed a compliance audit. Damage over a period of 11 years after the court hearing the testimony of such reports. I to calculate the damage.
