Section 941 of the draft will spend the money on maturity and are due any day. Who shall submit bills to spend money on that day.
Section 942 the draft will force the paying of bills before maturity, you may find you can not.
In addition to paying any money, but the bills are due. That they do so with the sound of their own misfortunes.
Section 943 of the draft, which has to be ordered to spend at the end of the period from the day one can see that. You set the date of approval or objection.
If no objection. The testimonials are not dated. You shall be deemed to have accepted the word of the day at the end of the period, which is restricted by law. The contract for the submission to it.
Section 944 of the draft that provides money when they see it. He said they will spend the day on the draft. The money must be filed within the prescribed time. Which force them to submit the bills are approved for use in a certain period of time after seeing it.
Section 945 of the money will be taken only when a vendor bills the user to make full payment of the bills that he signed.
Section 946 of the draft. If they take the money, but only partially. He will reject you, that it can not accept it.
If you get the money he used, but only partially. He must save it in the bill. And deliver the receipt to the money.
Section 947 does not file a bill to spend money on a day to remember. He is certified to remove themselves from liability by the amount owed to it by them.
Section 948 if they pay the full bill to pay soon. You know who has the right to take recourse to remove them prior to a party which does not agree to pay at that time.
Section 949 within the provisions of Section 1009 shall be used in the determination shall be released from liability. Unless they can make a fraud or serious negligence. In addition, this person must prove the fact that it has been endorsed consecutive uninterrupted. I do not have to prove that the signatures of endorsement.
Supreme Court in 8328/2550.
Contracts, sales contracts, promissory notes, as one of a promissory note issued to the plaintiff. The defendant's liability as guarantor, the three sales contracts, promissory notes above. It is not mandatory to follow the method of Section 985 and Section 941 shall be required to submit bills to spend money on maturity.
The Bankruptcy Court has ordered the reorganization of the sales contract, promissory note. Not affect the liability of defendants in all three. Which is the guarantor of the debt under the promissory note sales. Section 90/60 of the Bankruptcy Act, the plaintiff shall not be sold to reduce debt under the promissory notes to apply for repayment in bankruptcy cases. Does not hold such debt. The defendant did not make it three out of the liability of the guarantor. This may not be the case under Section 697.
Supreme Court to 405/2550.
Promissory notes and debt disputes. Indicates that a defendant who is out of contract, promissory note will be paid to the plaintiff. The debt is scheduled as a day of the calendar. The date specified in the promissory note. When determining when and where a defendant does not pay the bills, the defendant, therefore, constitute an immediate default. Without notice under Section 204, paragraph two, despite the provisions of Section 985 to Section 941 of the bill comes into force on the promissory note with it. However, it is not as contrary to the promissory notes. The provisions in the promissory note. Promissory notes will be issued to those who write about.It is in Section 986, paragraph two, the plaintiff was not required to file a case under Section 941 and promissory notes.
Supreme Court in 5328/2537.
Promissory note dispute that the defendants have made clear that a contract will amount to 8 million Baht to the plaintiff on demand. We see that the maturity of the notes using the dispute to date. Plaintiffs claim the money at the beginning of Section 913 (3) is in no way be interpreted as a promissory note of the money when they see any bills that spend money on demand meaningful and effective with. ticket When they see the money. If the dispute which called for the payment of promissory notes payable on demand. So do not fall under the provisions of Section 944 of the first paragraph of Article 985 shall apply to the use of money within six months from the date of the ticket. Promissory notes, bills of rights is to use the money on demand. Plaintiff's claim is dated September 4, 2528 is beginning to be used. Of age on the last day of Sunday, September 4, 2531, a week since I started working with the Civil. And Commercial Section 161 (original) The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 5, 2531 is not beyond three years. Not terminate the plaintiff's case under section 1001 petition that the defendant does not dispute the debt, promissory note. However, the two defendants to raise the issue without this clause as a defense. Court did not determine an issue in dispute. The Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal decision is picking up. I was diagnosed with non-defense issues. It is not picking up that it was like in the District Court and Court of Appeal. Supreme Court decision is not accepted by the Code of Civil Procedure Section 249, paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 3340/2536.
Aval promissory note shall have the obligation is a debt which is issued by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 940, first paragraph, to sue the aval promissory note shall be filed within 3 years from the date to maturity pursuant to Section 1001 of promissory notes. Not for money. Promissory notes must be regarded as any kind of money when they see the second paragraph of Section 984 which requires payment of a promissory note shall be in accordance with chapter The bill also stipulates that the money should be spent on that type under Section 944 of the 985 days on the ticket. However, the money must be filed within the prescribed time, which forced them to give. Acceptance of bills of credit for a certain time after seeing it. For which the deadline for the submission to be accepted. Bills are to be used in a certain period of time after he had seen. Section 928 is that the bills submitted for approval within six months from the date of the bills or At slow speed, but the payer is listed. He notes that any kind of money. When you see may be the ticket to the ticket money from the ticket that. The date of the ticket, but will later be extended to use the money for 6 months from the date the ticket was not. The time spent on tickets. The use of their money when they see it from the date the ticket was due until six months from the date of the ticket. The last day that may apply, depending upon the amount that would be the ticket. Use the money any day. Promissory note dispute dated January 31, 2520 at the end of six months from the date the ticket is dated July 31, 2520 does not appear that the debtor is a person who holds promissory note dispute taken to apply to the use of funds must be considered on July 31, 2520. The last date on which the petitioner may be forced to spend the money, according to promissory notes, the dispute is a dispute about the use of promissory notes. The 3-year-old star of the 1001 must start from the date when the debtor's right to oppose it. I let her spend the money on December 2, 2530 to terminate the Section. 1001 the opposition has no right to demand that she take the money, according to promissory note dispute.
Supreme Court in 1042/2534.
On the promissory notes payable to the plaintiff, who has not been filed by the defendants at the domicile of the defendant to spend money on tickets. I have a claim to the plaintiff nor the defendant issuer of promissory notes. Follow the procedures under Section 985 of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 941, thus forcing them to listen is not that the defendant committed a non-payment of promissory notes to the plaintiff. It would appear that the plaintiff demanded the defendant and the defendant does not have to pay it. The plaintiff's claim for general liability. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power against the five defendants to 5 shall be liable to pay by check to the plaintiff because the plaintiff's case be transferred out by the dispute. Terrorism cooperation is fraudulent, the burden of proof falls upon the defendant to 5 to attest to listen to the defendant's fifth claim, check the dispute was a debt the defendant, five shall serve as proof that the defendant's second breach of contract. sting Hni. has terminated the contract of sale and the plaintiff received in settlement by knowing that the purchase agreement. 2, with a share of the defendant. Abandoned when the defendant can be traced to the fact that 5 is not it. So I do not dispute that the plaintiff by the terrorism cooperation and transfer of check fraud, the defendant is liable under the 5 second defendant in the dispute as a payer.
Supreme Court to 653/2521.
The bill does not specify the interest set. This is the case, the plaintiff who claims paid directly by the defendant that a bill which has been approved. I call it from a person whom the right of recourse under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 968 plaintiff is entitled to interest on a bill due and is guilty. I followed the general obligations as provided in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 204 224.
The plaintiffs, who have recourse to the interest rate of five percent per year since The due date for payment of those endorsements, and others which are liable under the bill, it shall have the right to take interest. Rate of five percent per year from the defendant, a certified bill of exchange, which must be shared with the person who is liable to the plaintiff. With the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 967 968 (2).
Supreme Court in 1409/2514.
The defendant issued a check payable to holders of non-dated check is given. But when the check is in the possession of the plaintiff's. This is the check that was already dated check. Be by any person not to be important. When that day does not check that it is wrong and that without faith it is considered as a check list to complete and check it by any person. It is not important. When that day does not check that it is wrong and that without faith it is considered as a check list and check the completeness of processing. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 910 and 989.
Supreme Court in 1595/2509.
Defendant to pay plaintiff a check for the third defendant as endorser. The check is due and the plaintiff's account. But the bank refused to pay. Payer and the three defendants must jointly endorse and is liable to the plaintiff, a holder under the Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 967, the third defendant to be a debtor with a non-defendant as a guarantor. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 700 and 948 do not come into force.
Section 942 the draft will force the paying of bills before maturity, you may find you can not.
In addition to paying any money, but the bills are due. That they do so with the sound of their own misfortunes.
Section 943 of the draft, which has to be ordered to spend at the end of the period from the day one can see that. You set the date of approval or objection.
If no objection. The testimonials are not dated. You shall be deemed to have accepted the word of the day at the end of the period, which is restricted by law. The contract for the submission to it.
Section 944 of the draft that provides money when they see it. He said they will spend the day on the draft. The money must be filed within the prescribed time. Which force them to submit the bills are approved for use in a certain period of time after seeing it.
Section 945 of the money will be taken only when a vendor bills the user to make full payment of the bills that he signed.
Section 946 of the draft. If they take the money, but only partially. He will reject you, that it can not accept it.
If you get the money he used, but only partially. He must save it in the bill. And deliver the receipt to the money.
Section 947 does not file a bill to spend money on a day to remember. He is certified to remove themselves from liability by the amount owed to it by them.
Section 948 if they pay the full bill to pay soon. You know who has the right to take recourse to remove them prior to a party which does not agree to pay at that time.
Section 949 within the provisions of Section 1009 shall be used in the determination shall be released from liability. Unless they can make a fraud or serious negligence. In addition, this person must prove the fact that it has been endorsed consecutive uninterrupted. I do not have to prove that the signatures of endorsement.
Supreme Court in 8328/2550.
Contracts, sales contracts, promissory notes, as one of a promissory note issued to the plaintiff. The defendant's liability as guarantor, the three sales contracts, promissory notes above. It is not mandatory to follow the method of Section 985 and Section 941 shall be required to submit bills to spend money on maturity.
The Bankruptcy Court has ordered the reorganization of the sales contract, promissory note. Not affect the liability of defendants in all three. Which is the guarantor of the debt under the promissory note sales. Section 90/60 of the Bankruptcy Act, the plaintiff shall not be sold to reduce debt under the promissory notes to apply for repayment in bankruptcy cases. Does not hold such debt. The defendant did not make it three out of the liability of the guarantor. This may not be the case under Section 697.
Supreme Court to 405/2550.
Promissory notes and debt disputes. Indicates that a defendant who is out of contract, promissory note will be paid to the plaintiff. The debt is scheduled as a day of the calendar. The date specified in the promissory note. When determining when and where a defendant does not pay the bills, the defendant, therefore, constitute an immediate default. Without notice under Section 204, paragraph two, despite the provisions of Section 985 to Section 941 of the bill comes into force on the promissory note with it. However, it is not as contrary to the promissory notes. The provisions in the promissory note. Promissory notes will be issued to those who write about.It is in Section 986, paragraph two, the plaintiff was not required to file a case under Section 941 and promissory notes.
Supreme Court in 5328/2537.
Promissory note dispute that the defendants have made clear that a contract will amount to 8 million Baht to the plaintiff on demand. We see that the maturity of the notes using the dispute to date. Plaintiffs claim the money at the beginning of Section 913 (3) is in no way be interpreted as a promissory note of the money when they see any bills that spend money on demand meaningful and effective with. ticket When they see the money. If the dispute which called for the payment of promissory notes payable on demand. So do not fall under the provisions of Section 944 of the first paragraph of Article 985 shall apply to the use of money within six months from the date of the ticket. Promissory notes, bills of rights is to use the money on demand. Plaintiff's claim is dated September 4, 2528 is beginning to be used. Of age on the last day of Sunday, September 4, 2531, a week since I started working with the Civil. And Commercial Section 161 (original) The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 5, 2531 is not beyond three years. Not terminate the plaintiff's case under section 1001 petition that the defendant does not dispute the debt, promissory note. However, the two defendants to raise the issue without this clause as a defense. Court did not determine an issue in dispute. The Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal decision is picking up. I was diagnosed with non-defense issues. It is not picking up that it was like in the District Court and Court of Appeal. Supreme Court decision is not accepted by the Code of Civil Procedure Section 249, paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 3340/2536.
Aval promissory note shall have the obligation is a debt which is issued by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 940, first paragraph, to sue the aval promissory note shall be filed within 3 years from the date to maturity pursuant to Section 1001 of promissory notes. Not for money. Promissory notes must be regarded as any kind of money when they see the second paragraph of Section 984 which requires payment of a promissory note shall be in accordance with chapter The bill also stipulates that the money should be spent on that type under Section 944 of the 985 days on the ticket. However, the money must be filed within the prescribed time, which forced them to give. Acceptance of bills of credit for a certain time after seeing it. For which the deadline for the submission to be accepted. Bills are to be used in a certain period of time after he had seen. Section 928 is that the bills submitted for approval within six months from the date of the bills or At slow speed, but the payer is listed. He notes that any kind of money. When you see may be the ticket to the ticket money from the ticket that. The date of the ticket, but will later be extended to use the money for 6 months from the date the ticket was not. The time spent on tickets. The use of their money when they see it from the date the ticket was due until six months from the date of the ticket. The last day that may apply, depending upon the amount that would be the ticket. Use the money any day. Promissory note dispute dated January 31, 2520 at the end of six months from the date the ticket is dated July 31, 2520 does not appear that the debtor is a person who holds promissory note dispute taken to apply to the use of funds must be considered on July 31, 2520. The last date on which the petitioner may be forced to spend the money, according to promissory notes, the dispute is a dispute about the use of promissory notes. The 3-year-old star of the 1001 must start from the date when the debtor's right to oppose it. I let her spend the money on December 2, 2530 to terminate the Section. 1001 the opposition has no right to demand that she take the money, according to promissory note dispute.
Supreme Court in 1042/2534.
On the promissory notes payable to the plaintiff, who has not been filed by the defendants at the domicile of the defendant to spend money on tickets. I have a claim to the plaintiff nor the defendant issuer of promissory notes. Follow the procedures under Section 985 of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 941, thus forcing them to listen is not that the defendant committed a non-payment of promissory notes to the plaintiff. It would appear that the plaintiff demanded the defendant and the defendant does not have to pay it. The plaintiff's claim for general liability. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power against the five defendants to 5 shall be liable to pay by check to the plaintiff because the plaintiff's case be transferred out by the dispute. Terrorism cooperation is fraudulent, the burden of proof falls upon the defendant to 5 to attest to listen to the defendant's fifth claim, check the dispute was a debt the defendant, five shall serve as proof that the defendant's second breach of contract. sting Hni. has terminated the contract of sale and the plaintiff received in settlement by knowing that the purchase agreement. 2, with a share of the defendant. Abandoned when the defendant can be traced to the fact that 5 is not it. So I do not dispute that the plaintiff by the terrorism cooperation and transfer of check fraud, the defendant is liable under the 5 second defendant in the dispute as a payer.
Supreme Court to 653/2521.
The bill does not specify the interest set. This is the case, the plaintiff who claims paid directly by the defendant that a bill which has been approved. I call it from a person whom the right of recourse under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 968 plaintiff is entitled to interest on a bill due and is guilty. I followed the general obligations as provided in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 204 224.
The plaintiffs, who have recourse to the interest rate of five percent per year since The due date for payment of those endorsements, and others which are liable under the bill, it shall have the right to take interest. Rate of five percent per year from the defendant, a certified bill of exchange, which must be shared with the person who is liable to the plaintiff. With the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 967 968 (2).
Supreme Court in 1409/2514.
The defendant issued a check payable to holders of non-dated check is given. But when the check is in the possession of the plaintiff's. This is the check that was already dated check. Be by any person not to be important. When that day does not check that it is wrong and that without faith it is considered as a check list to complete and check it by any person. It is not important. When that day does not check that it is wrong and that without faith it is considered as a check list and check the completeness of processing. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 910 and 989.
Supreme Court in 1595/2509.
Defendant to pay plaintiff a check for the third defendant as endorser. The check is due and the plaintiff's account. But the bank refused to pay. Payer and the three defendants must jointly endorse and is liable to the plaintiff, a holder under the Code. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 967, the third defendant to be a debtor with a non-defendant as a guarantor. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 700 and 948 do not come into force.
