Section 807 agencies must be clearly expressed or implied by the order of when the command is not so. It must be the way to do business in their trade and they do it.
The provisions of section 659 by depositing the property. You apply mutatis mutandis as it should.
Section 808 agencies must make their own. Unless you have the authority to delegate.
Section 809 on the presence of intending to do is to be delegate to represent them in any reasonable time. Must notify the agency of knowing. However, when it is finished. Representatives to discuss the account with.
Section 810 funds and other assets as the agency received about by an agent. That agency must submit to the souls of them.
In addition to all the agents have worked in their behalf. However, by the people instead of them. Agents will be transferred to the souls of them.
Section 811 if the agent took the money which should have ever been. Or which should be used in the business of living as they pay for them. That agency must pay interest from the date the money was not used.
Section 812 If any damage occurs. Because of the negligence of the agent from. They do not represent it. Or because they are without power or authority than this. That agent will be liable.
Section 813 of the agent, the agent identified by the set. That agent will be liable only if they know that the agent is suitable for those who do not. Or those who do not deserve the trust and did not notice it, character does not know that the withdrawal of the agent itself.
Section 814 would represent a direct liability to their lives back together myself.
Supreme Court in 9384/2552.
Assigned to the plaintiff, the plaintiff's money to bail Sat g Court. The defendant received money from the MP to take action when the case reached the Court of First Instance ordered the insurance money payable by the bank district, a defendant is the payee. Defendants who are in a position in the money base is expected to be filed out. Money to their bank check only. The defendant shall be used to pay the bank the check is not money or property to the defendant. Received concerning the representation of the defendant shall be delivered to the plaintiff. This is in accordance with Section 810 directly if the defendant fails to pay such money to the plaintiff. It is that the plaintiff is entitled to payment of the property of the defendant. Including money or other property. That the defendant owed to such third parties in accordance with Section 214 the plaintiff had no right to compel the defendant to withdraw from the bank the check given to the plaintiff. It also asked the banks, which are used by third parties in such cases. The plaintiff did not.
The plaintiff's complaint has been filed, the defendant forced to withdraw by check payable to the plaintiff the amount of 70,000 Baht can be considered a complaint seeking to force the defendant to pay a debt payment. It can not be forced to act against the defendant. The court also sentenced the defendant to the plaintiff for such payments.
Supreme Court in 3497/2551.
Plaintiff to the defendant as a land agent. The plaintiff sued the defendant forced to refund the redemption of the mortgage to the plaintiff. It is an indictment of the defendant, who represents the return of property under Section 810 even if the agent will not make a claim in court documents as they are not contrary to Section 798. paragraph.
The plaintiff brought the witnesses to be traced to the relationship between the plaintiff with That the defendant is true that the defendant is the plaintiff mortgagee. I would further attest to changes in land contract is not prohibited by Civil procedure Code with Section 94 (b).
Supreme Court in 2031/2551.
The objective of the business of the debtor's financial investment accounts as an agent. Must use caution and common ฝื hand as far as it takes. And should be required in the lender's money to invest, according to Section 807 and Section 659 paragraph two, paragraph three of the debtor and creditors to reduce the amount of bills issued by the Ministry and is certified. money orders payable to the University and its capital is invested by Sun for failure to comply with Aval confirmation of the debtor's investment policy. Committee of creditors that To invest in the bank accepted bill of exchange is an act by an agent. Without power or authority other than that of the delegation. The result was that the creditor can not collect money under the bill. The creditor has filed a bill from the payer's money and endorsements Aval. And has submitted an application for payment from the assets of the aval and court approval. The creditors have been paid. But it is not certain that the creditors are paid in full or not. The debtor's creditors have been causing the damage. The debtor is liable to pay compensation to the creditors.
Supreme Court in 6291/2550.
Debt, the defendant made the debt caused by damage to the plaintiff that the defendant received. That the plaintiff's attorney. Which the plaintiff and the defendant is represented. The defendant filed a civil debt from the grade, but I forge the compromise agreement that the defendant was indicted, and I agree to the compromise agreement shall pay to the plaintiff or the plaintiff. Damage caused to the plaintiff, the defendant was not caused by an agent under Section 812, which has no specific provisions in the statute. The age of 10 years under Section 193/30 of the book debt and the debt is not a violation of the age of 1 year under section 420, 448.
Supreme Court in 4266/2550.
Defendant a duty to order from the district, as a representative of the National Police Agency, which the plaintiffs. On our products. The order was not used or used as an objective. Two of the defendants. The plaintiff was not damaged in some way caused by the defendant in both actions. Represent a liability under Section 812.
Supreme Court in 2178/2548.
Plaintiff to the defendant the land. By permitting the plaintiff to keep the mortgage and signed by the defendant in Power of Attorney does not apply to the plaintiff for the plaintiff to be redeemed. Withdrawal of the mortgage itself. Shows that the defendant received land on the plaintiff to sue on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant was forced to change the name of the mortgagee is named as a defendant's character. Against the assets of the defendant which is in accordance with Section 810, even without evidence, as they claim, the court was not contrary to Section 798.
Supreme Court in 5460/2547.
The plaintiff sued the defendant claiming that B represents the assignment of the plaintiff as a transfer. Ownership of land from landowners. The plaintiff was a mother, the plaintiff contracted to buy land from landowners, with the plaintiff's claims are based on charges that B has ownership of the land which the plaintiff. B. It is the duty of the agent to the transfer of land to B on the representations received are returned to the plaintiff under Section 810, paragraph one, and when B dies. Defendant as a trustee of the Product shall have the obligation to transfer such land to be returned to the plaintiff. Plaint of the plaintiff as it is referred to the defendant as a trustee of the land owned by B. The return of the plaintiff, who received a B. The relation with the representation of the plaintiff to the plaintiff. As a function of aging rather than having to comply with such provisions. The indictment filed by the estate of the accused like this. The plaintiff did not receive any property, but any new increase. It is claimed that no case under the jurisdiction of the Court to be heard. Court for consideration.
Supreme Court in 4709/2545.
The defendant is the name of the plaintiff's ownership of the land dispute which is the principal The defendant is obligated to deliver to the plaintiff in the disputed land while getting it. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 810, paragraph one of the defendants to the disputed land is mortgaged to the Bank. The plaintiff did not consent. The defendant was returned to the transfer of the disputed land to the plaintiff by the same mortgage. However, the redemption of a mortgage. Defendants who have money to pay the mortgage to the mortgagee until the mortgage is required if the defendant fails to comply, it may not proceed in court to order them. The event is open to the environment, debt repayable The two lower courts ruled that the plaintiff by the defendant to redeem the mortgage as a waste. Total cost. It is not too over the verdict and the indictment must be based. Code of Civil Procedure Section 142, paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 4309/2540.
The plaintiff filed a complaint. The plaintiff sued the defendant described the proceedings as plaintiff's attorney to Sat. As well as to appoint representatives to act in accordance with the Power of Attorney. Filed a lawsuit against the No. 2 and discussed further. Sat authorized to delegate to. Was. Is authorized to appoint a lawyer and filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff. According to the lawsuit documents, power of attorney over the No. 3 show that while the indictment. Sat authority over them. The. The plaintiff sued the defendants under both the attorney and the attorney. Was attached to the lawsuit. The date of the power of attorney over a day later, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit even when the attorney was not identified เงื่อนเวลาเริ่มต้น of the mandate period. Whether the appointee has the power at any time. It is seen that while the indictment. Sat authority over them. Was. Is authorized to prosecute the plaintiff for a lot of the delegate. After filing a complaint to make. New. Powerless against the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 4709/2545.
Representing a defendant disputes the plaintiff's own land, which the defendant The transfer of the disputed land to restore to the plaintiff by the mortgage. However, the redemption of a mortgage. Defendant, the mortgagor must pay to the mortgagee to pay the debt in full. Land disputes are to be free of mortgage. If the defendant does not follow that the court can not order it as a condition of any debt repayment will remain open. The court sentenced the defendant to redeem the mortgage. If the defendant does not redeem the mortgage by refinancing the mortgage to the plaintiff, the defendant is free. Expense was not a judge, or in addition to the indictment.
Supreme Court in 7626/2541.
According to the complaint of the plaintiff's claim that the plaintiff's lawyer representing the plaintiff. Act beyond the powers of representation, however, that the plaintiff, which has been damaged. To any plaintiff would have liked to have been taken to correct the plaintiff's legal counsel. The plaintiff's case as plaintiff and defendant entered into a compromise. In court and the court sentenced her to this. Judgement of the compromise agreement would bind the plaintiff by the execution. Section 145 of the Civil Court if that is correct, it may be appealed against. Such judgments. If your case as provided for in section 138 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff appealed and the case. Ultimately it. The plaintiff sued to revoke the ruling. The compromise agreement can not
Supreme Court in 2986/2537.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Plaintiff, the defendant is assigned to the dealer. The defendant sold the plaintiff did not deliver the goods to the plaintiff deposits a claim that the defendants sold the property on behalf of itself and then not deliver them to him. Which the plaintiff. A breach of contract agents and describe the request. Ask the court to compel the defendant to pay that amount plus interest to the plaintiff. With proof of purchase and letter of the defendant's orders, and accept a sale to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the dark
Plaintiff, the defendant appointed the plaintiff as a dealer in machinery. The defendant has introduced the buyer to install the equipment properly maintained. To verify every piece of equipment before using the machine. And will be responsible for providing after-sale service contracts. The defendant was an agent of the plaintiff is not a broker. Defendant must deliver the deposit to the plaintiff which the defendant was not delivered. Must pay interest to the plaintiff under Section 811.
When the agent is required that Price the agent will offer to buy it. Must not be higher than the list price at the dealer. Therefore, selling overpriced products to our customers. And not send the deposit to the plaintiff, the principal It is the agent for the wrongful act. Agents are not entitled to pension in this section.
Supreme Court in 3981/2536.
The second defendant as a creditor, director of the Defense Printing Co Ltd to subcontractors without a contract according to plan in advance to pay in exchange. Amount of wages. And pay up to 300,000 baht for each violation of the regulations that govern employment. Act 2504 and regulations on the authority of the director authorized แlaa Karp.s. 2496 should assume that the two defendants had been done without authority. And is liable to pay compensation to creditors under Section 812 of the creditor to obtain payment from the assets of two defendants have accused the two have the power to operate the Sun as a job to go to work. overseas based. Royal decree established - the Express Transportation Organization of 2469, Section 22 and regulations governing the authority and the authority of the Director of the 2496 Article 7 when it appears that Sun is not appropriate to do so, instead of creditors. A defendant who does not deserve the trust of the two will not be liable to creditors. In the process, the creditor must return the money. MP calls for job seekers to get the creditor has no right to receive payment in this section.
Supreme Court in 4061/2533.
Translation of documents for possible consideration at any one of the document to text only. If you need to consider the whole purpose of the document and is also the beginning of a power of attorney will be assigned to the assignee of the business done. Japan, in a way. But the message was not limited to the subsequent appointee shall be made only in Japan but only the plaintiff's attorney made in Japan, which is home to the office. Branch of the plaintiff, and claimed to be the legal representative of Japan. Or its appointee shall be made in Japan for some. It does not limit the statement in Japan.
When the power of attorney, a message intended to authorize. Thor is authorized to set forth in the affairs relating to insurance. Were by no means limited to that action, but in Japan only. It also authorized. Thor has the power to prosecute and the power of the agent or attorney-up period. To authorize the filing and prosecution in May, which is representing the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 68/2531.
Y. The power of the W. Prosecution of the plaintiff was allowed. Authorized by the plaintiff by the authority. Judicial proceedings, the plaintiff and has the power to delegate to the left. And. It does not modify the original authorization or a new appointee. That follows. Me. And. With the intent to use the same power it. The original mandate of the left. And. It's perfect. The plaintiff from the lawsuit. The attorney for the plaintiff Y. Prosecution.
The provisions of section 659 by depositing the property. You apply mutatis mutandis as it should.
Section 808 agencies must make their own. Unless you have the authority to delegate.
Section 809 on the presence of intending to do is to be delegate to represent them in any reasonable time. Must notify the agency of knowing. However, when it is finished. Representatives to discuss the account with.
Section 810 funds and other assets as the agency received about by an agent. That agency must submit to the souls of them.
In addition to all the agents have worked in their behalf. However, by the people instead of them. Agents will be transferred to the souls of them.
Section 811 if the agent took the money which should have ever been. Or which should be used in the business of living as they pay for them. That agency must pay interest from the date the money was not used.
Section 812 If any damage occurs. Because of the negligence of the agent from. They do not represent it. Or because they are without power or authority than this. That agent will be liable.
Section 813 of the agent, the agent identified by the set. That agent will be liable only if they know that the agent is suitable for those who do not. Or those who do not deserve the trust and did not notice it, character does not know that the withdrawal of the agent itself.
Section 814 would represent a direct liability to their lives back together myself.
Supreme Court in 9384/2552.
Assigned to the plaintiff, the plaintiff's money to bail Sat g Court. The defendant received money from the MP to take action when the case reached the Court of First Instance ordered the insurance money payable by the bank district, a defendant is the payee. Defendants who are in a position in the money base is expected to be filed out. Money to their bank check only. The defendant shall be used to pay the bank the check is not money or property to the defendant. Received concerning the representation of the defendant shall be delivered to the plaintiff. This is in accordance with Section 810 directly if the defendant fails to pay such money to the plaintiff. It is that the plaintiff is entitled to payment of the property of the defendant. Including money or other property. That the defendant owed to such third parties in accordance with Section 214 the plaintiff had no right to compel the defendant to withdraw from the bank the check given to the plaintiff. It also asked the banks, which are used by third parties in such cases. The plaintiff did not.
The plaintiff's complaint has been filed, the defendant forced to withdraw by check payable to the plaintiff the amount of 70,000 Baht can be considered a complaint seeking to force the defendant to pay a debt payment. It can not be forced to act against the defendant. The court also sentenced the defendant to the plaintiff for such payments.
Supreme Court in 3497/2551.
Plaintiff to the defendant as a land agent. The plaintiff sued the defendant forced to refund the redemption of the mortgage to the plaintiff. It is an indictment of the defendant, who represents the return of property under Section 810 even if the agent will not make a claim in court documents as they are not contrary to Section 798. paragraph.
The plaintiff brought the witnesses to be traced to the relationship between the plaintiff with That the defendant is true that the defendant is the plaintiff mortgagee. I would further attest to changes in land contract is not prohibited by Civil procedure Code with Section 94 (b).
Supreme Court in 2031/2551.
The objective of the business of the debtor's financial investment accounts as an agent. Must use caution and common ฝื hand as far as it takes. And should be required in the lender's money to invest, according to Section 807 and Section 659 paragraph two, paragraph three of the debtor and creditors to reduce the amount of bills issued by the Ministry and is certified. money orders payable to the University and its capital is invested by Sun for failure to comply with Aval confirmation of the debtor's investment policy. Committee of creditors that To invest in the bank accepted bill of exchange is an act by an agent. Without power or authority other than that of the delegation. The result was that the creditor can not collect money under the bill. The creditor has filed a bill from the payer's money and endorsements Aval. And has submitted an application for payment from the assets of the aval and court approval. The creditors have been paid. But it is not certain that the creditors are paid in full or not. The debtor's creditors have been causing the damage. The debtor is liable to pay compensation to the creditors.
Supreme Court in 6291/2550.
Debt, the defendant made the debt caused by damage to the plaintiff that the defendant received. That the plaintiff's attorney. Which the plaintiff and the defendant is represented. The defendant filed a civil debt from the grade, but I forge the compromise agreement that the defendant was indicted, and I agree to the compromise agreement shall pay to the plaintiff or the plaintiff. Damage caused to the plaintiff, the defendant was not caused by an agent under Section 812, which has no specific provisions in the statute. The age of 10 years under Section 193/30 of the book debt and the debt is not a violation of the age of 1 year under section 420, 448.
Supreme Court in 4266/2550.
Defendant a duty to order from the district, as a representative of the National Police Agency, which the plaintiffs. On our products. The order was not used or used as an objective. Two of the defendants. The plaintiff was not damaged in some way caused by the defendant in both actions. Represent a liability under Section 812.
Supreme Court in 2178/2548.
Plaintiff to the defendant the land. By permitting the plaintiff to keep the mortgage and signed by the defendant in Power of Attorney does not apply to the plaintiff for the plaintiff to be redeemed. Withdrawal of the mortgage itself. Shows that the defendant received land on the plaintiff to sue on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant was forced to change the name of the mortgagee is named as a defendant's character. Against the assets of the defendant which is in accordance with Section 810, even without evidence, as they claim, the court was not contrary to Section 798.
Supreme Court in 5460/2547.
The plaintiff sued the defendant claiming that B represents the assignment of the plaintiff as a transfer. Ownership of land from landowners. The plaintiff was a mother, the plaintiff contracted to buy land from landowners, with the plaintiff's claims are based on charges that B has ownership of the land which the plaintiff. B. It is the duty of the agent to the transfer of land to B on the representations received are returned to the plaintiff under Section 810, paragraph one, and when B dies. Defendant as a trustee of the Product shall have the obligation to transfer such land to be returned to the plaintiff. Plaint of the plaintiff as it is referred to the defendant as a trustee of the land owned by B. The return of the plaintiff, who received a B. The relation with the representation of the plaintiff to the plaintiff. As a function of aging rather than having to comply with such provisions. The indictment filed by the estate of the accused like this. The plaintiff did not receive any property, but any new increase. It is claimed that no case under the jurisdiction of the Court to be heard. Court for consideration.
Supreme Court in 4709/2545.
The defendant is the name of the plaintiff's ownership of the land dispute which is the principal The defendant is obligated to deliver to the plaintiff in the disputed land while getting it. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 810, paragraph one of the defendants to the disputed land is mortgaged to the Bank. The plaintiff did not consent. The defendant was returned to the transfer of the disputed land to the plaintiff by the same mortgage. However, the redemption of a mortgage. Defendants who have money to pay the mortgage to the mortgagee until the mortgage is required if the defendant fails to comply, it may not proceed in court to order them. The event is open to the environment, debt repayable The two lower courts ruled that the plaintiff by the defendant to redeem the mortgage as a waste. Total cost. It is not too over the verdict and the indictment must be based. Code of Civil Procedure Section 142, paragraph one.
Supreme Court in 4309/2540.
The plaintiff filed a complaint. The plaintiff sued the defendant described the proceedings as plaintiff's attorney to Sat. As well as to appoint representatives to act in accordance with the Power of Attorney. Filed a lawsuit against the No. 2 and discussed further. Sat authorized to delegate to. Was. Is authorized to appoint a lawyer and filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff. According to the lawsuit documents, power of attorney over the No. 3 show that while the indictment. Sat authority over them. The. The plaintiff sued the defendants under both the attorney and the attorney. Was attached to the lawsuit. The date of the power of attorney over a day later, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit even when the attorney was not identified เงื่อนเวลาเริ่มต้น of the mandate period. Whether the appointee has the power at any time. It is seen that while the indictment. Sat authority over them. Was. Is authorized to prosecute the plaintiff for a lot of the delegate. After filing a complaint to make. New. Powerless against the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 4709/2545.
Representing a defendant disputes the plaintiff's own land, which the defendant The transfer of the disputed land to restore to the plaintiff by the mortgage. However, the redemption of a mortgage. Defendant, the mortgagor must pay to the mortgagee to pay the debt in full. Land disputes are to be free of mortgage. If the defendant does not follow that the court can not order it as a condition of any debt repayment will remain open. The court sentenced the defendant to redeem the mortgage. If the defendant does not redeem the mortgage by refinancing the mortgage to the plaintiff, the defendant is free. Expense was not a judge, or in addition to the indictment.
Supreme Court in 7626/2541.
According to the complaint of the plaintiff's claim that the plaintiff's lawyer representing the plaintiff. Act beyond the powers of representation, however, that the plaintiff, which has been damaged. To any plaintiff would have liked to have been taken to correct the plaintiff's legal counsel. The plaintiff's case as plaintiff and defendant entered into a compromise. In court and the court sentenced her to this. Judgement of the compromise agreement would bind the plaintiff by the execution. Section 145 of the Civil Court if that is correct, it may be appealed against. Such judgments. If your case as provided for in section 138 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff appealed and the case. Ultimately it. The plaintiff sued to revoke the ruling. The compromise agreement can not
Supreme Court in 2986/2537.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Plaintiff, the defendant is assigned to the dealer. The defendant sold the plaintiff did not deliver the goods to the plaintiff deposits a claim that the defendants sold the property on behalf of itself and then not deliver them to him. Which the plaintiff. A breach of contract agents and describe the request. Ask the court to compel the defendant to pay that amount plus interest to the plaintiff. With proof of purchase and letter of the defendant's orders, and accept a sale to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the dark
Plaintiff, the defendant appointed the plaintiff as a dealer in machinery. The defendant has introduced the buyer to install the equipment properly maintained. To verify every piece of equipment before using the machine. And will be responsible for providing after-sale service contracts. The defendant was an agent of the plaintiff is not a broker. Defendant must deliver the deposit to the plaintiff which the defendant was not delivered. Must pay interest to the plaintiff under Section 811.
When the agent is required that Price the agent will offer to buy it. Must not be higher than the list price at the dealer. Therefore, selling overpriced products to our customers. And not send the deposit to the plaintiff, the principal It is the agent for the wrongful act. Agents are not entitled to pension in this section.
Supreme Court in 3981/2536.
The second defendant as a creditor, director of the Defense Printing Co Ltd to subcontractors without a contract according to plan in advance to pay in exchange. Amount of wages. And pay up to 300,000 baht for each violation of the regulations that govern employment. Act 2504 and regulations on the authority of the director authorized แlaa Karp.s. 2496 should assume that the two defendants had been done without authority. And is liable to pay compensation to creditors under Section 812 of the creditor to obtain payment from the assets of two defendants have accused the two have the power to operate the Sun as a job to go to work. overseas based. Royal decree established - the Express Transportation Organization of 2469, Section 22 and regulations governing the authority and the authority of the Director of the 2496 Article 7 when it appears that Sun is not appropriate to do so, instead of creditors. A defendant who does not deserve the trust of the two will not be liable to creditors. In the process, the creditor must return the money. MP calls for job seekers to get the creditor has no right to receive payment in this section.
Supreme Court in 4061/2533.
Translation of documents for possible consideration at any one of the document to text only. If you need to consider the whole purpose of the document and is also the beginning of a power of attorney will be assigned to the assignee of the business done. Japan, in a way. But the message was not limited to the subsequent appointee shall be made only in Japan but only the plaintiff's attorney made in Japan, which is home to the office. Branch of the plaintiff, and claimed to be the legal representative of Japan. Or its appointee shall be made in Japan for some. It does not limit the statement in Japan.
When the power of attorney, a message intended to authorize. Thor is authorized to set forth in the affairs relating to insurance. Were by no means limited to that action, but in Japan only. It also authorized. Thor has the power to prosecute and the power of the agent or attorney-up period. To authorize the filing and prosecution in May, which is representing the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 68/2531.
Y. The power of the W. Prosecution of the plaintiff was allowed. Authorized by the plaintiff by the authority. Judicial proceedings, the plaintiff and has the power to delegate to the left. And. It does not modify the original authorization or a new appointee. That follows. Me. And. With the intent to use the same power it. The original mandate of the left. And. It's perfect. The plaintiff from the lawsuit. The attorney for the plaintiff Y. Prosecution.
