Section 747 of the pledge is a promise that one person. The one thing that the pledge of movable property delivered to another person. The pawnbroker As collateral for a loan.
Section 748 shall pledge as security for payment of the following is the equipment cost.
(1) Interest.
(2) compensation for non-payment.
(3) court fees to enforce the pledge.
(4) the cost to maintain the pledged property.
(5) compensation for damage caused by the defects of the property pledged is not clear.
Section 749 shall be agreed between the parties pledge to keep the pledged property.
Section 750 if the property pledged as eligible instruments. The instrument is not delivered to the pawnbroker Nor does such a pledge by the debtor of the gem. He said the pledge would be void.
Section 751 of the pledged securities issued to the individual to his command. You shall not raise as a defense to a third party. Shall be endorsed on the instrument to appear as a pawn.
In addition, this is not necessary to notify the debtor of the instrument.
Section 752 of the pledged securities issued to the person by name and is not transferable by endorsement. You must make the pledge that message to appear in the instrument itself. And you shall not raise as a defense to the debtor of the securities or third parties. Unless the notice is to inform the debtor of the pledged securities.
Section 753 if the pledged shares. The bonds are in registered form. You shall not raise as a defense to a company or a third party. Unless you take the pledge it to the registration book of the company under provisions of Title 22 regarding the transfer of shares or debentures.
Section 754 of the pledge if the debt is due before the gem to ensure that Debtor to deliver property rights, the rights object to the pledge. Property and become the pawn of a right of pledge.
If the right of pledge. The debt must be paid in cash. And debts due before the insurance is a gem. You must use the money to the pledge and the pledge together. If they both agree that reconciliation. Each person that likes to be called to pay that amount on deposit at the office of property to benefit sharing.
Section 755 of the pledge, you shall not do it right, the right to end or modify the damage to the pledge by the pledge does not agree with.
Section 756 to be agreed before the debt is due, but as one that fails to pay the debt. The pledge is a pledge of property. Or to manage its property otherwise than in accordance with provisions of that With the enforcement of the pledge gem. Such agreements are not perfect.
Section 757 of the 13 provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the pledge he made to the government but by allowing the pawnshop. Is not inconsistent with law. Or regulations that pawn.
Supreme Court in 5099/2548.
Bills pledged as security for debts the defendant to the plaintiff. The pledge by the plaintiff, who has been endorsed and accepted bills of exchange. In possession under Section 926 and 766, when a pledge to endorse the bill. He shall exercise all due, but the total And the pledge, the bill would have the right to charge according to the maturity. The pledge is not required to notify the plaintiff is entitled to charge the bills that are due to less money. The first payment of the defendant by the plaintiff is not required to notify the defendant that a prior pledge.
In the case of property pledged by the general. If the pledge is a pledge to enforce a written notice to the debtor to pay. Debt and in a reasonable period of notice is given to the first. If the debtor fails to comply with a notice to the property pledged to put it like that. Loan auctions by the Section 764 paragraphs one and two. If an agreement to manage the property as the other provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Such an agreement would not be complete under Section 756, and even in the case of forced liquidation of the pledge is a pledge by the Bill. Assurance that debt. The honor pledge has the right to charge them without notice. Before any enforcement of the pledge. But the draft bill by the due date for payment under Section 766 of the plaintiff to enforce payment of the bills that are pledged. To redemption prior to maturity by the payment of the bill. Not with the above-mentioned provisions of law. The redemption or receive payment under the bill before the due date of payment to the payer would prefer not to pay until the due date. But this case is not honoring honoring to the plaintiff, with reductions to the money. The payer can benefit from the discounts. The plaintiff received a benefit payment, but the defendant is a party have benefited from the adoption of the redemption proceeds from ticket Redeemed before the maturity date is less than the amount by which the net debt was less a defendant would have been damaged by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the money was missing. Or withholding of payments to be accurate.
Supreme Court in 3293/2545.
Deposit accounts shall be deposited with the bank was owned by the petitioner. Since the deposit. Debtors have the right to withdraw the deposit to. She was obliged to refund the full amount under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 672 of the delivery of passbook deposits, which can not be delivered as a chattel. Passbook as proof of deposit and withdrawal to the depositary. I take it so easy to deposit and withdraw on account of the depositor. Passbook is not in the nature of the instrument, which has an agreement with the debtor. He held the passbook as collateral against the debt claim, it is not. Pledge to the Fund under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 750 was thus not the creditors in accordance with Section 6 of the Bankruptcy Act.
Supreme Court in 5603/2544.
Pledge agreement between the debtor to object to that machine. The parties agreed to maintain the property as a pledge to maintain the machines. The pawns are allowed to take advantage of the machinery is not considered a pledge. Machine back into the possession of the pledge. The fact that the g pawn machines. Is treated by a debtor is in business to take advantage of their time. It is a promise to avoid the law. In interpreting the intent is to focus even more true intentions mean Idioms letters under Section 171 on the true intent of the debtor to take advantage of the assets pledged. To the objection that the pledge to allow the debtor to take advantage of. Pledged assets, pledged to give the property back into possession of the pledge under Section 769 (2), and the pledge to end the suspension. The opposition has no right to receive payment as creditors under the pledge of the machine.
Supreme Court to 694/2544.
Deposit based savings account that she had deposited with them. Shall be the property of their demand deposits since then. I have just had the right to withdraw the deposit back, and she has to. Refunds for withdrawals only. The delivery of movable property other than the defendant who was not in any way by a pawn, pledge, deposit The passbook savings for the defendant to the petitioner, it is only with the agreement. The right to receive a refund of the deposit to the plaintiff to insure all debts of the borrower. As such it is not a movable property shall be delivered to each other. In particular, a right which is fixed by law. It is a pledge of the instruments under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 750, so when I did not pledge, deposit or pledge of the defendant. The instruments are the vocals. She preferred to refer to the pledge on the assets of the execution. The Civil Section 287 is not the petitioner has no right to withdraw the deposit freeze.
Supreme Court in 2867/2541.
Agreement made in advance will be invalid under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 373 should be the exception, the debtor is liable for fraud. Or for his gross negligence. The agreement between the plaintiff and a defendant that the plaintiff bank products. The pledge was broken, lost or degraded intact or whether the plaintiff shall not be liable for any reason there is no agreement, the plaintiff is not liable for the camera. Fraud or gross negligence of the plaintiff is not an agreement. Contrary to public order or good morals of the people. Or contrary to the law can force a defendant to a storage warehouse for sugar. Brown did not appear to be lost because the plaintiff is pledged to. The plaintiff's action. Or an action. Or gross negligence which causes sugar to be lost. And under the terms of the pledge. The plaintiff is not liable for the damage or defect. Loss or degradation of sugar to the pledge of the plaintiff is not liable for any damage, loss or degradation of sugar to the pledge.
Supreme Court in 1063/2540.
Plaintiffs and problems. Has led to a fixed amount of U.S. $ 1 million in the bank, provided that: a.. Payment and closing plaintiff and problems.'ll Need to share and Bank of. Has passbook to later problems. The book deposit is to pledge the right to withdrawal from the account that the Bank had to. S. limited partnership's debts secured on the defendant without the consent of the plaintiff. According to the document is as follows: Mon 10 of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 747 of the pledge, the pledge of movable property, one thing must be delivered to another person. That the pledge as collateral for a loan, even major cases. Delivered to the defendant to deposit book, though the problem. The plaintiff made a deposit in an amount of such deposits to the bank. A. ownership of the deposit shall be the property of the bank. A. A bank would then have to be refunded in full, the only problem. Book deposit is given to the defendant that the pledge is not required. And the nature of the contract documents. Mon 10 of these were used as a pawn of the instrument, the Civil and Commercial Law Section 750 does not. The passbook is just such a document showing the deposits and withdrawals. The depositary, the deposit adhering to the ease of depositing and withdrawing money in the account. Identification of the depositor. And shown to be a debtor or creditor of the depositor against the depositary bank, it is plain that to be evidence of rights generally. The instruments used are not entitled to the rights or property of which is documented in accordance. The ceremony in the law and transfer it to the instrument. The document refers to a pledge agreement, but Mon 10 of the problem. The bank deposit book contract dispute with the plaintiff to the defendant and the documents referred to the book, Mon 10 deposit to the defendant under the contract. When the problem. is co-owner of a passbook, which according to the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1357 to assume ownership of the same. If, therefore, bound and forced to be part of the problem. I promise not to violate the law. The defendant is entitled by the agreement to hold the passbook. The plaintiff is the owner and one asks the defendant delivered to plaintiff a passbook.
Supreme Court in 2220/2535.
Enforcement Officer the property of the defendant had all 7 is only for those who claim the property as collateral for the money. The defendant to recover money lent to the petitioner only. The plaintiff is entitled to seize the defendant's public auction to pay the money. Indebted to the petitioner does not request the release of the seized property to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 1474/2528.
The defendant objected that the contract with the bank. Give the defendant the defendant deposits with deposit receipts as collateral for debt. Defendant's breach of contract against the bank if the defendant refused to take money from the bank against the account. The deposit payable immediately. And as long as the bank has not received payment. The defendant is not withdrawal. And will not act as a deterioration in the mortgage contract. Instruments such as certificates of deposit, the pledge of the defendant. As collateral for a debt to the bank against the defendants under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 747 750 Bank protester It is the pledge of rights under the instrument, then the creditors have rights over. Assets as collateral under the Bankruptcy Act. Act 2483 Section 95 and Section 110 paragraph three.
The pledge of a debt instrument under which the certificate of deposit as a payment processor. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 754, paragraph two, the defendant agreed with the bank's deposit against the amount payable by the defendant. Must be taken to auction, to be pledged against the bank are eligible. Less: Fixed deposits pledged to the bank where the defendant intended to repay the bank in As creditors.
Against the bank. The defendant is before the court, creditors have the right to offset against the defendant. Section 102 of the Bankruptcy Act without the consent of the defendant and Right to request offset under this section shall be made only after a period of protection. The official had no property rights. Withdraw the set-off under section 115 (Supreme Court's Conference 2453/2527).
Supreme Court in 3697/2528.
The plaintiff (the pledge), shall be entitled to redeem the property pledged as always, as long as the defendant (the pledge) to Not enforce the pledge. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had no right to redeem the expiration of the contract and no. Act, which stipulates that if forced to pledge. The pledge has the right to redeem after the expiration of the redemption of the contract. That there are provisions that Agreement before the loan due if the recipient does not repay a loan. Assets pledged or otherwise manage the property in addition provisions. But with the enforcement of the pledge. Under the agreement is not perfect. 756 of the Civil and Commercial Code.
Supreme Court to 311/2527.
Loan agreement with a bank overdraft objector By the pledge as a security deposit slip. With written consent. The objector is entitled to deduct the deposit receipt for the deposit payment. Under the overdraft. Prior to the debtor filed for bankruptcy nine months, a fraction of an objection by the exercise of the consent payment. Certificates of deposit, loan and overdraft accounts later. The bankruptcy was filed. It is exercised under the terms of the debtor. Which is also effective in the past to withhold it. The debtor's pledge of a deposit receipt. The objection that a creditor. The insurance is just right over the property as collateral is a deposit receipt. According to Section 95 of the Bankruptcy Act, which the opposition has only. The right to take legal action to obtain a certificate of deposit, without payment to you. Court employees only. Exercise may not deduct the deposit slip. Objection to paying for them. It is an agreement that grants the loan. Management of the assets pledged otherwise. In addition to those provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Agreement shall not be complete. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 756. The agreement was unlawful. The opposition has no right to withhold the certificate of deposit payment has been held that such agreements. Actions against the debtor intends to take advantage of other creditors, like the court to revoke the right to withhold the certificate of deposit. That has been done to them by Section 115 of the Bankruptcy Act for an objection to the settlement, according to an official receipt for the deposit. As the above section. 115 Official Receiver to operate as a separate case from the case.
Supreme Court in 2405/2516.
The plaintiff sued the defendant forced the plaintiff to recover paid 3,500 baht to the defendant and the defendant gave the gun to the plaintiff pledged as security for the defendant to the plaintiff returned to combat that. The plaintiff did not pay the loan within the loan including the interest of the defendant. But the plaintiff would be charged interest by the court at the request of the plaintiff to the defendant sentenced to pay 3,500 baht plus interest will be liable to the plaintiff. The defendant is not a compulsory counterclaim to the plaintiff any interest.
Supreme Court to 485/2513.
It took the pledge of property as collateral for a loan with a debt settlement may be driven out. Property insurance is a separate section. Creditors will use the debt-claim for the payment of common property. Of the debtor under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 214, or to enforce the pledge. The pledge does not bind the pledge to be the only one pawn.
Supreme Court to 249/2522.
Securities pledged with a bank guarantee defendants the plaintiff's debt to B. B is due to the defendant by the defendant, the defendant is guaranteed the debt of B to B shall be due to the defendant that the defendant used it, and that will be used. In the face of the plaintiff is bound by pledge of shares is also referred to the plaintiff from the defendant did not share.
A pledge of shares tendered in the manifest is not evidence or interpretation.
Section 748 shall pledge as security for payment of the following is the equipment cost.
(1) Interest.
(2) compensation for non-payment.
(3) court fees to enforce the pledge.
(4) the cost to maintain the pledged property.
(5) compensation for damage caused by the defects of the property pledged is not clear.
Section 749 shall be agreed between the parties pledge to keep the pledged property.
Section 750 if the property pledged as eligible instruments. The instrument is not delivered to the pawnbroker Nor does such a pledge by the debtor of the gem. He said the pledge would be void.
Section 751 of the pledged securities issued to the individual to his command. You shall not raise as a defense to a third party. Shall be endorsed on the instrument to appear as a pawn.
In addition, this is not necessary to notify the debtor of the instrument.
Section 752 of the pledged securities issued to the person by name and is not transferable by endorsement. You must make the pledge that message to appear in the instrument itself. And you shall not raise as a defense to the debtor of the securities or third parties. Unless the notice is to inform the debtor of the pledged securities.
Section 753 if the pledged shares. The bonds are in registered form. You shall not raise as a defense to a company or a third party. Unless you take the pledge it to the registration book of the company under provisions of Title 22 regarding the transfer of shares or debentures.
Section 754 of the pledge if the debt is due before the gem to ensure that Debtor to deliver property rights, the rights object to the pledge. Property and become the pawn of a right of pledge.
If the right of pledge. The debt must be paid in cash. And debts due before the insurance is a gem. You must use the money to the pledge and the pledge together. If they both agree that reconciliation. Each person that likes to be called to pay that amount on deposit at the office of property to benefit sharing.
Section 755 of the pledge, you shall not do it right, the right to end or modify the damage to the pledge by the pledge does not agree with.
Section 756 to be agreed before the debt is due, but as one that fails to pay the debt. The pledge is a pledge of property. Or to manage its property otherwise than in accordance with provisions of that With the enforcement of the pledge gem. Such agreements are not perfect.
Section 757 of the 13 provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the pledge he made to the government but by allowing the pawnshop. Is not inconsistent with law. Or regulations that pawn.
Supreme Court in 5099/2548.
Bills pledged as security for debts the defendant to the plaintiff. The pledge by the plaintiff, who has been endorsed and accepted bills of exchange. In possession under Section 926 and 766, when a pledge to endorse the bill. He shall exercise all due, but the total And the pledge, the bill would have the right to charge according to the maturity. The pledge is not required to notify the plaintiff is entitled to charge the bills that are due to less money. The first payment of the defendant by the plaintiff is not required to notify the defendant that a prior pledge.
In the case of property pledged by the general. If the pledge is a pledge to enforce a written notice to the debtor to pay. Debt and in a reasonable period of notice is given to the first. If the debtor fails to comply with a notice to the property pledged to put it like that. Loan auctions by the Section 764 paragraphs one and two. If an agreement to manage the property as the other provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Such an agreement would not be complete under Section 756, and even in the case of forced liquidation of the pledge is a pledge by the Bill. Assurance that debt. The honor pledge has the right to charge them without notice. Before any enforcement of the pledge. But the draft bill by the due date for payment under Section 766 of the plaintiff to enforce payment of the bills that are pledged. To redemption prior to maturity by the payment of the bill. Not with the above-mentioned provisions of law. The redemption or receive payment under the bill before the due date of payment to the payer would prefer not to pay until the due date. But this case is not honoring honoring to the plaintiff, with reductions to the money. The payer can benefit from the discounts. The plaintiff received a benefit payment, but the defendant is a party have benefited from the adoption of the redemption proceeds from ticket Redeemed before the maturity date is less than the amount by which the net debt was less a defendant would have been damaged by the wrongful acts of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the money was missing. Or withholding of payments to be accurate.
Supreme Court in 3293/2545.
Deposit accounts shall be deposited with the bank was owned by the petitioner. Since the deposit. Debtors have the right to withdraw the deposit to. She was obliged to refund the full amount under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 672 of the delivery of passbook deposits, which can not be delivered as a chattel. Passbook as proof of deposit and withdrawal to the depositary. I take it so easy to deposit and withdraw on account of the depositor. Passbook is not in the nature of the instrument, which has an agreement with the debtor. He held the passbook as collateral against the debt claim, it is not. Pledge to the Fund under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 750 was thus not the creditors in accordance with Section 6 of the Bankruptcy Act.
Supreme Court in 5603/2544.
Pledge agreement between the debtor to object to that machine. The parties agreed to maintain the property as a pledge to maintain the machines. The pawns are allowed to take advantage of the machinery is not considered a pledge. Machine back into the possession of the pledge. The fact that the g pawn machines. Is treated by a debtor is in business to take advantage of their time. It is a promise to avoid the law. In interpreting the intent is to focus even more true intentions mean Idioms letters under Section 171 on the true intent of the debtor to take advantage of the assets pledged. To the objection that the pledge to allow the debtor to take advantage of. Pledged assets, pledged to give the property back into possession of the pledge under Section 769 (2), and the pledge to end the suspension. The opposition has no right to receive payment as creditors under the pledge of the machine.
Supreme Court to 694/2544.
Deposit based savings account that she had deposited with them. Shall be the property of their demand deposits since then. I have just had the right to withdraw the deposit back, and she has to. Refunds for withdrawals only. The delivery of movable property other than the defendant who was not in any way by a pawn, pledge, deposit The passbook savings for the defendant to the petitioner, it is only with the agreement. The right to receive a refund of the deposit to the plaintiff to insure all debts of the borrower. As such it is not a movable property shall be delivered to each other. In particular, a right which is fixed by law. It is a pledge of the instruments under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 750, so when I did not pledge, deposit or pledge of the defendant. The instruments are the vocals. She preferred to refer to the pledge on the assets of the execution. The Civil Section 287 is not the petitioner has no right to withdraw the deposit freeze.
Supreme Court in 2867/2541.
Agreement made in advance will be invalid under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 373 should be the exception, the debtor is liable for fraud. Or for his gross negligence. The agreement between the plaintiff and a defendant that the plaintiff bank products. The pledge was broken, lost or degraded intact or whether the plaintiff shall not be liable for any reason there is no agreement, the plaintiff is not liable for the camera. Fraud or gross negligence of the plaintiff is not an agreement. Contrary to public order or good morals of the people. Or contrary to the law can force a defendant to a storage warehouse for sugar. Brown did not appear to be lost because the plaintiff is pledged to. The plaintiff's action. Or an action. Or gross negligence which causes sugar to be lost. And under the terms of the pledge. The plaintiff is not liable for the damage or defect. Loss or degradation of sugar to the pledge of the plaintiff is not liable for any damage, loss or degradation of sugar to the pledge.
Supreme Court in 1063/2540.
Plaintiffs and problems. Has led to a fixed amount of U.S. $ 1 million in the bank, provided that: a.. Payment and closing plaintiff and problems.'ll Need to share and Bank of. Has passbook to later problems. The book deposit is to pledge the right to withdrawal from the account that the Bank had to. S. limited partnership's debts secured on the defendant without the consent of the plaintiff. According to the document is as follows: Mon 10 of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 747 of the pledge, the pledge of movable property, one thing must be delivered to another person. That the pledge as collateral for a loan, even major cases. Delivered to the defendant to deposit book, though the problem. The plaintiff made a deposit in an amount of such deposits to the bank. A. ownership of the deposit shall be the property of the bank. A. A bank would then have to be refunded in full, the only problem. Book deposit is given to the defendant that the pledge is not required. And the nature of the contract documents. Mon 10 of these were used as a pawn of the instrument, the Civil and Commercial Law Section 750 does not. The passbook is just such a document showing the deposits and withdrawals. The depositary, the deposit adhering to the ease of depositing and withdrawing money in the account. Identification of the depositor. And shown to be a debtor or creditor of the depositor against the depositary bank, it is plain that to be evidence of rights generally. The instruments used are not entitled to the rights or property of which is documented in accordance. The ceremony in the law and transfer it to the instrument. The document refers to a pledge agreement, but Mon 10 of the problem. The bank deposit book contract dispute with the plaintiff to the defendant and the documents referred to the book, Mon 10 deposit to the defendant under the contract. When the problem. is co-owner of a passbook, which according to the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1357 to assume ownership of the same. If, therefore, bound and forced to be part of the problem. I promise not to violate the law. The defendant is entitled by the agreement to hold the passbook. The plaintiff is the owner and one asks the defendant delivered to plaintiff a passbook.
Supreme Court in 2220/2535.
Enforcement Officer the property of the defendant had all 7 is only for those who claim the property as collateral for the money. The defendant to recover money lent to the petitioner only. The plaintiff is entitled to seize the defendant's public auction to pay the money. Indebted to the petitioner does not request the release of the seized property to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 1474/2528.
The defendant objected that the contract with the bank. Give the defendant the defendant deposits with deposit receipts as collateral for debt. Defendant's breach of contract against the bank if the defendant refused to take money from the bank against the account. The deposit payable immediately. And as long as the bank has not received payment. The defendant is not withdrawal. And will not act as a deterioration in the mortgage contract. Instruments such as certificates of deposit, the pledge of the defendant. As collateral for a debt to the bank against the defendants under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 747 750 Bank protester It is the pledge of rights under the instrument, then the creditors have rights over. Assets as collateral under the Bankruptcy Act. Act 2483 Section 95 and Section 110 paragraph three.
The pledge of a debt instrument under which the certificate of deposit as a payment processor. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 754, paragraph two, the defendant agreed with the bank's deposit against the amount payable by the defendant. Must be taken to auction, to be pledged against the bank are eligible. Less: Fixed deposits pledged to the bank where the defendant intended to repay the bank in As creditors.
Against the bank. The defendant is before the court, creditors have the right to offset against the defendant. Section 102 of the Bankruptcy Act without the consent of the defendant and Right to request offset under this section shall be made only after a period of protection. The official had no property rights. Withdraw the set-off under section 115 (Supreme Court's Conference 2453/2527).
Supreme Court in 3697/2528.
The plaintiff (the pledge), shall be entitled to redeem the property pledged as always, as long as the defendant (the pledge) to Not enforce the pledge. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had no right to redeem the expiration of the contract and no. Act, which stipulates that if forced to pledge. The pledge has the right to redeem after the expiration of the redemption of the contract. That there are provisions that Agreement before the loan due if the recipient does not repay a loan. Assets pledged or otherwise manage the property in addition provisions. But with the enforcement of the pledge. Under the agreement is not perfect. 756 of the Civil and Commercial Code.
Supreme Court to 311/2527.
Loan agreement with a bank overdraft objector By the pledge as a security deposit slip. With written consent. The objector is entitled to deduct the deposit receipt for the deposit payment. Under the overdraft. Prior to the debtor filed for bankruptcy nine months, a fraction of an objection by the exercise of the consent payment. Certificates of deposit, loan and overdraft accounts later. The bankruptcy was filed. It is exercised under the terms of the debtor. Which is also effective in the past to withhold it. The debtor's pledge of a deposit receipt. The objection that a creditor. The insurance is just right over the property as collateral is a deposit receipt. According to Section 95 of the Bankruptcy Act, which the opposition has only. The right to take legal action to obtain a certificate of deposit, without payment to you. Court employees only. Exercise may not deduct the deposit slip. Objection to paying for them. It is an agreement that grants the loan. Management of the assets pledged otherwise. In addition to those provisions. With the enforcement of the pledge. Agreement shall not be complete. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 756. The agreement was unlawful. The opposition has no right to withhold the certificate of deposit payment has been held that such agreements. Actions against the debtor intends to take advantage of other creditors, like the court to revoke the right to withhold the certificate of deposit. That has been done to them by Section 115 of the Bankruptcy Act for an objection to the settlement, according to an official receipt for the deposit. As the above section. 115 Official Receiver to operate as a separate case from the case.
Supreme Court in 2405/2516.
The plaintiff sued the defendant forced the plaintiff to recover paid 3,500 baht to the defendant and the defendant gave the gun to the plaintiff pledged as security for the defendant to the plaintiff returned to combat that. The plaintiff did not pay the loan within the loan including the interest of the defendant. But the plaintiff would be charged interest by the court at the request of the plaintiff to the defendant sentenced to pay 3,500 baht plus interest will be liable to the plaintiff. The defendant is not a compulsory counterclaim to the plaintiff any interest.
Supreme Court to 485/2513.
It took the pledge of property as collateral for a loan with a debt settlement may be driven out. Property insurance is a separate section. Creditors will use the debt-claim for the payment of common property. Of the debtor under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 214, or to enforce the pledge. The pledge does not bind the pledge to be the only one pawn.
Supreme Court to 249/2522.
Securities pledged with a bank guarantee defendants the plaintiff's debt to B. B is due to the defendant by the defendant, the defendant is guaranteed the debt of B to B shall be due to the defendant that the defendant used it, and that will be used. In the face of the plaintiff is bound by pledge of shares is also referred to the plaintiff from the defendant did not share.
A pledge of shares tendered in the manifest is not evidence or interpretation.
