Section 168 of the intention to act against the person who shall have immediate effect from the recipients of the intention to be aware of the intention that Use of this through the person of the intention to another person by telephone. Or by other communication tools. Or by other means which can connect to each other the same way.
Section 169 of the intention to act against the person shall be deemed not in immediate effect from the time the intention that the recipients of the intention. However, if the recipient was told to withdraw the declaration of intention. Before or simultaneously with the intention that the recipients of the intention. Of the intention to be vested in a fruitless
Of the intention to be sent would not be detrimental to. Even after the declaration of intention is the intention to death. Or a court order or quasi-incompetent.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5901/2550.
The intent of the person who is not in the immediate. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 169 states that "the intention to act against the person shall be deemed not in immediate effect from the time the intention that the recipients of the intention ...." Statement that the recipient of the intention that does not mean that Send a letter to the leaders must find the recipient of the intention to direct But it does mean that Leaders need to send a letter to send at the residence or of business of the recipient of the intention. Even as to residence or of business of the recipient of the intention. Will not find a recipient of the intention to direct Send it considered as a valid place as the postal authorities to terminate the lease to the letter sent to the second defendant that the defendant's residence at 2, which sent an official. Although no two defendants and no one admitted. But it can be considered. Letter to terminate the lease of the plaintiff to the defendant, 2 and termination of the lease under such laws. Terminate the lease of the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is unlawful.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1602/2548.
The plaintiff owned by the Town disputes inherited from P. The Grad Defendant entered into an agreement to lease quarters debate 15 year old set lease with the lease agreement in Article 11 states that when the lease expired and the lessor will continue to lease every three years, according to the agreement text. Is a commitment of P. Whether the tenant to renew the contract was only Not cause the contract. But this promise is not binding, P. It is not the response that the defendant has been before P. Both died when the defendant knows is that P. Proposal to death on July 5, 2537 before the lease is due date is December 31, 2538 case must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 360 which states that prohibit the provisions of Section 169 paragraph two shall apply, so committed. of P.These have no effect and not a legacy that will bind the heirs, the plaintiffs must comply with the provisions of Section 1599 and Section 1600 request for renewal of the defendant is of no effect. And does not cause a new lease. The plaintiff sued to terminate the lease and the defendant drove out of the building and subject to the dispute.
The Supreme Court 5655 - 5751/2543.
On June 29, 2541 defendant sent a copy of Notification of termination of the plaintiff. From the Central Office, Bangkok. By fax to the post to let the plaintiff know the sugar mill under the plaintiff in Lampang. Despite posting the day. But will have the effect of the dismissal notice on the plaintiff to know such announcement. The plaintiff aware of the notice and dismissal of the defendant on July 3, 2541 to consider the defendant notice dismissal plaintiff on July 3, 2541, and have the effect of dismissal when to be paid Wage the next forward date is August 30, 2541 at notice and dismissal of the defendant wishes to the dismissal of parties on August 1, 2541 not in compliance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 582 plaintiff has the right to receive Wage instead of notice in August 2541 were 30 days of filing and Remember Ye million to pay interest instead of SWage notice half the rate of seven percent per year under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, Section 7 contains the date of the filing date, which is by default.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 939/2542.
Defendant filed a request to open a current account overdraft loan agreement with the plaintiff on the same day. The parties do not require the payment date. Current account agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant has a contract with no time limit. This case, either party to terminate the contract at any time. The book claims that the plaintiff had indicated to the defendant to pay the debt within 15 days from the date of receipt of demand. If the defendant fails to pay overdue debts, then the contract shall be deemed to account termination. As when the defendant received notice and the defendant. Unpaid debt to the plaintiff within. Account Agreement shall be deemed so since the expiration of that Overdraft loan agreement specified that The demand notice to the borrower in writing. Even sent was not picked because the borrower has not been moved by the lender to notify the note shall be sent to the borrower and the like. When the borrower does not appear that the defendant had to notify the plaintiff in mind. So, postal employees, the plaintiff's demand letter to send to the defendant at the address specified in the agreement holds that the defendant had received a letter of demand by the plaintiff and the like in the day. In the book claims to identify the defendant, a settlement within 15 days from the date of receipt of demand. Repayment schedule. Deadline is on November 2, 2540, when a defendant fails to pay the debt within that time the plaintiff. Current account contract. Between the plaintiff and defendant shall be deemed one has since On the expiration date is November 3, 2540.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1062/2540.
Promissory note dispute are clearly defined. Promissory notes issued to the plaintiff will use the money on demand, so maturity of the promissory note money dispute means the date the plaintiff to demand payment of the in Civil and Commercial Code, Section 913 (3) Find the right to spend money not on the ticket. Both cases have been issued and the call to the defendant, the recipient Aval loan under promissory note dispute then. Age, it can not start from the date of the ticket. Notice of demand of the plaintiff gave the defendant time payment under the promissory note within 7 days from the date of receipt of such period which is reasonable. This means that the plaintiff, a creditor referred to the defendant prior to the repayment schedule is not determined. But the defendant, a debtor will pay the debt before it. If the expiration of the defendant has not paid it is considered in default. The plaintiff may force the defendant to pay the promissory note debt settlement as a recipient Aval maturity date after the demand letter and then onwards 7 days of the due date is the date the book claims that the statute of September 19, 2533. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1001, to begin from the date of 20 September 2533 onwards, it starts from the day to find that the defendant did not receive notices of claims. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 14, 2536 3 years is not the case due to not terminate the plaintiff is.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5785/2539.
Case with the disputed funds in the floor no more than two hundred thousand petition need not petition the Supreme Court in fact a decision of law must be based on the fact that the Court of Appeal decision from the evidence in the record Officer post to the notice of termination of the plaintiff to send the domicile of the defendant, one even can not find the defendant, one and no one admitted by the result of the defendant, an inevitable recognition is considered the notice of termination has to The first defendant and the effect of termination of the contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2777/2535.
The plaintiff the defendant agreed to change how new payments include principal and accrued interest to date of the agreement to send back a repayment period of 54 months period each month if the defendant in default in any month shall be deemed in default all Litigation is subject to the provisions of the P.Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1,Section 166 of November 5 years old.
Defendants to pay debts under a month. 2 months later, the date of March 13, 2524 the defendant failed to pay any debt. All defendants considered late period. Claim a refund, all are up. Of age called the amount of outstanding claims from the defendant is starting on March 14, 2524, and then find the right starting from the age when the defendant failed to pay debts is not the last. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on July 15, 2531 over five years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 169 of Section 166 action is terminate the plaintiff.
Section 169 of the intention to act against the person shall be deemed not in immediate effect from the time the intention that the recipients of the intention. However, if the recipient was told to withdraw the declaration of intention. Before or simultaneously with the intention that the recipients of the intention. Of the intention to be vested in a fruitless
Of the intention to be sent would not be detrimental to. Even after the declaration of intention is the intention to death. Or a court order or quasi-incompetent.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5901/2550.
The intent of the person who is not in the immediate. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 169 states that "the intention to act against the person shall be deemed not in immediate effect from the time the intention that the recipients of the intention ...." Statement that the recipient of the intention that does not mean that Send a letter to the leaders must find the recipient of the intention to direct But it does mean that Leaders need to send a letter to send at the residence or of business of the recipient of the intention. Even as to residence or of business of the recipient of the intention. Will not find a recipient of the intention to direct Send it considered as a valid place as the postal authorities to terminate the lease to the letter sent to the second defendant that the defendant's residence at 2, which sent an official. Although no two defendants and no one admitted. But it can be considered. Letter to terminate the lease of the plaintiff to the defendant, 2 and termination of the lease under such laws. Terminate the lease of the plaintiff to the defendant 2 is unlawful.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1602/2548.
The plaintiff owned by the Town disputes inherited from P. The Grad Defendant entered into an agreement to lease quarters debate 15 year old set lease with the lease agreement in Article 11 states that when the lease expired and the lessor will continue to lease every three years, according to the agreement text. Is a commitment of P. Whether the tenant to renew the contract was only Not cause the contract. But this promise is not binding, P. It is not the response that the defendant has been before P. Both died when the defendant knows is that P. Proposal to death on July 5, 2537 before the lease is due date is December 31, 2538 case must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 360 which states that prohibit the provisions of Section 169 paragraph two shall apply, so committed. of P.These have no effect and not a legacy that will bind the heirs, the plaintiffs must comply with the provisions of Section 1599 and Section 1600 request for renewal of the defendant is of no effect. And does not cause a new lease. The plaintiff sued to terminate the lease and the defendant drove out of the building and subject to the dispute.
The Supreme Court 5655 - 5751/2543.
On June 29, 2541 defendant sent a copy of Notification of termination of the plaintiff. From the Central Office, Bangkok. By fax to the post to let the plaintiff know the sugar mill under the plaintiff in Lampang. Despite posting the day. But will have the effect of the dismissal notice on the plaintiff to know such announcement. The plaintiff aware of the notice and dismissal of the defendant on July 3, 2541 to consider the defendant notice dismissal plaintiff on July 3, 2541, and have the effect of dismissal when to be paid Wage the next forward date is August 30, 2541 at notice and dismissal of the defendant wishes to the dismissal of parties on August 1, 2541 not in compliance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 582 plaintiff has the right to receive Wage instead of notice in August 2541 were 30 days of filing and Remember Ye million to pay interest instead of SWage notice half the rate of seven percent per year under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, Section 7 contains the date of the filing date, which is by default.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 939/2542.
Defendant filed a request to open a current account overdraft loan agreement with the plaintiff on the same day. The parties do not require the payment date. Current account agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant has a contract with no time limit. This case, either party to terminate the contract at any time. The book claims that the plaintiff had indicated to the defendant to pay the debt within 15 days from the date of receipt of demand. If the defendant fails to pay overdue debts, then the contract shall be deemed to account termination. As when the defendant received notice and the defendant. Unpaid debt to the plaintiff within. Account Agreement shall be deemed so since the expiration of that Overdraft loan agreement specified that The demand notice to the borrower in writing. Even sent was not picked because the borrower has not been moved by the lender to notify the note shall be sent to the borrower and the like. When the borrower does not appear that the defendant had to notify the plaintiff in mind. So, postal employees, the plaintiff's demand letter to send to the defendant at the address specified in the agreement holds that the defendant had received a letter of demand by the plaintiff and the like in the day. In the book claims to identify the defendant, a settlement within 15 days from the date of receipt of demand. Repayment schedule. Deadline is on November 2, 2540, when a defendant fails to pay the debt within that time the plaintiff. Current account contract. Between the plaintiff and defendant shall be deemed one has since On the expiration date is November 3, 2540.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1062/2540.
Promissory note dispute are clearly defined. Promissory notes issued to the plaintiff will use the money on demand, so maturity of the promissory note money dispute means the date the plaintiff to demand payment of the in Civil and Commercial Code, Section 913 (3) Find the right to spend money not on the ticket. Both cases have been issued and the call to the defendant, the recipient Aval loan under promissory note dispute then. Age, it can not start from the date of the ticket. Notice of demand of the plaintiff gave the defendant time payment under the promissory note within 7 days from the date of receipt of such period which is reasonable. This means that the plaintiff, a creditor referred to the defendant prior to the repayment schedule is not determined. But the defendant, a debtor will pay the debt before it. If the expiration of the defendant has not paid it is considered in default. The plaintiff may force the defendant to pay the promissory note debt settlement as a recipient Aval maturity date after the demand letter and then onwards 7 days of the due date is the date the book claims that the statute of September 19, 2533. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1001, to begin from the date of 20 September 2533 onwards, it starts from the day to find that the defendant did not receive notices of claims. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 14, 2536 3 years is not the case due to not terminate the plaintiff is.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5785/2539.
Case with the disputed funds in the floor no more than two hundred thousand petition need not petition the Supreme Court in fact a decision of law must be based on the fact that the Court of Appeal decision from the evidence in the record Officer post to the notice of termination of the plaintiff to send the domicile of the defendant, one even can not find the defendant, one and no one admitted by the result of the defendant, an inevitable recognition is considered the notice of termination has to The first defendant and the effect of termination of the contract.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2777/2535.
The plaintiff the defendant agreed to change how new payments include principal and accrued interest to date of the agreement to send back a repayment period of 54 months period each month if the defendant in default in any month shall be deemed in default all Litigation is subject to the provisions of the P.Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1,Section 166 of November 5 years old.
Defendants to pay debts under a month. 2 months later, the date of March 13, 2524 the defendant failed to pay any debt. All defendants considered late period. Claim a refund, all are up. Of age called the amount of outstanding claims from the defendant is starting on March 14, 2524, and then find the right starting from the age when the defendant failed to pay debts is not the last. The plaintiff filed this lawsuit on July 15, 2531 over five years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 169 of Section 166 action is terminate the plaintiff.
