Section 193 / 9 of any claim if not applicable period. The law. Claims that a false sense of limitation
Section 193/10 right to terminate the call. Debtor is entitled. To refuse to pay debts by such claims.
Section 193/11 of the age specified by law that the parties will agree to abstain or extend or shorten impervious
Section 193/12 age, to start from the time that could force right. Claim on. If it claims to refrain from acting. Any to start from the first time against the acts that
Section 193/13 claims that creditors may not be enforceable unless Will demand repayment before the debtors. To start from the beginning at age. May be the first to call on. If the debtor does not pay until the debt. Over a period of time will have been Enyongpogn. From the time of the call. To start from age, from that time period then ended.
Section 193/14 age, would stop, tripped in the following.
(1) Accounts receivable for liability to creditors in accordance with claims made by. Book debts for the state. Payments to some of the security interest or any other action. Without a doubt shows a default. Agree that the liability claim.
(2) creditors have to set the evidence to bring a lawsuit or claim for repayment.
(3), creditors have filed an application for repayment in bankruptcy cases.
(4) creditors have given the dispute to arbitration.
(5) creditors have acted any other effect is the same with the prosecution.
Section 193/15 at the age of interrupted down. Time pass Before does not count in the limitation
When the reason for the prescription to end any time interrupted. To start from age The new since that time.
Section 193/16 of the debt or the debt, according to data. Creditors will receive Debt occasionally creditor claims the debtor a letter to the state Debt at any time prior to the age of abundant evidence. That age, the interruption stopped.
Section 193/17 in the case of age, interrupted a reason under Section 193/14 (2) If the case has made a final judgment to raise the complaint. Or disposal of cases completed by the reason to withdraw the case filed or Leave to sue. Age, shall be deemed not to have interrupted.
If the court does not accept the case. Or return or to address the complaint, why the case. Not in the jurisdiction Or the court to address the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice the right to sue New and appear due to age, then under consideration. Or will mature within sixty days from the date of sentence or order. The ultimate The creditors have the right to bring a lawsuit to set the evidence claims. Or to make payment within sixty days from the date of sentence or Order that the most
Section 193/18 to 193/17 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case. Prescription interrupted a reason under Section 193/14 (3) (4) and (5), mutatis mutandis.
Section 193/19 while the age of maturity beyond reason that if the act prevents creditors under Section 193/14 of the age, it is not due out until thirty days from the date Force Majeure is terminated.
Section 193/20 prescription claims of minors or of The court may order a person of unsound mind shall be incompetent or not. If you are due to the time that such person has not the ability groups. Full landscape or within one year from the date on which such person does not delegate The legitimacy or guardian. Age, it is not due until. Will be one year from the date on which that person has the ability to group or for the full landscape. Representatives for election or guardian has the case may be, but if the prescription Claims that a period of less than one year. , Then the period. The shorter the term is used instead of the one year.
Section 193/21 prescription claims of minors or of Or quasi-incompetent. To sue Representatives for election or guardian, or custodian of it if they will mature as a person in the group is not full to capacity landscape. Or within one year from the date on which such person does not like a representative of the fair or guardian. Or guardian. Age, are not yet due. Until one year. From the date on which that person has the ability to full group. Representatives for election landscape or a guardian or curator, or the case may be, but if the prescription claims for a period of less than one year. It led to a shorter period of the replacement period. One of the year.
Section 193/22 prescription claims between the husband and wife if the first is due. Or within one year from the date the marriage ended. Age, it is not due until one year after the date. Marriage ends.
Section 193/23 prescription claims which you or the death penalty if the person is due within one year from the date of death, age, are not yet due until one year from the date of death.
Section 193/24 at the age of matured debts are taking advantage of the age of the lost time. But taking such advantage of this. Do not prejudice the rights of any third party or a guarantor.
Section 193/25 at the age of matured To be retroactive Date up to the prescription
Section 193/26 on claims the president is missing. Age of the claims as part of the device terminate with Although the age of the claims of the device is not even due.
Section 193/27 mortgagee recipients who pledged or persons who The right to withhold over the assets of the debtor. Which they can rely on are still there. Entitled to enforce payment of the mortgage property or take them to. Although claims of the president will then terminate the matter. But the exercise is forced to pay the interest accrued over the past five years can not
Section 193/28 of the debt-claim, which does not expire and then that much is irrecoverable. Although the settlement will Claims do not know, then terminate the matter.
The provisions of paragraph one. Shall apply to the condition of the debtor. Liability evidence in writing or by providing insurance, but will refer to this as a punishment for the same is not guaranteed.
Section 193/29 when I'm lifting the statute of the court as a defense. Remove old claim the dismissal came as a result can not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5690/2552.
The defendant registered the plaintiff's divorce for the purpose of taxation, but still living. And dependent care as well as divorce is not the intention to deceive with the equation between knowledge of the divorce would be void under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 155 complaint, the plaintiff's claim that the divorce is invalid and ask to share assets that do not find it. Thus for the management of Marriage property with which the defendant has the right to request as long as the plaintiff. As far as the plaintiff and the defendant still has the same status as husband and wife. This is not the case and claims that must be done within the time prescribed by law under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 9.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 134/2551.
Loan agreement is an agreement that Defendant committed to the principal and the interest back to the plaintiff. By installments a month months 5,000 Baht as prosecution claims the defendant to pay the interest with principal under loan agreements are considered to be a call for interest with principal to finance the cost back as installments which have an age limit of the five-year According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 (2) (Section 166 originally), not the absence of legal provisions which require 10 years of age, under Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8419/2550.
Public of land disputes is for people to share. Who have no ownership or possessory right to use lean against the state and did not revoke the decree is also a public interest for people to share. But those who occupy land in dispute shall be entitled to better than others.
The plaintiff is a land dispute. Although the plaintiff does not have ownership or possessory right because it is the public. But the plaintiff in a land dispute shall be entitled to better Buy only the defendant's house to the shareholders of the plaintiff enforcement offices not allow the demolition of such houses from the land dispute is the plaintiff's right to dispute. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the authority to demolish the house from a land dispute.
The plaintiff is a land dispute, which is for people to share public of the plaintiff shall be entitled to better than the defendant and the defendant is not taking possession from the plaintiff. Defendant has raised the age of 1 year from the taking of possession. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1375 paragraph two, as a defense to the plaintiff that the plaintiff's action does not terminate the search.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7552/2550.
Thor Driving in the employ of the plaintiff's employer, who was Thor's car crash Insured to the Company that. Have been damaged after Thor The plaintiff claims to know of the death sentence the Supreme Court sentenced the plaintiff to pay to a Bank And Wor. And the plaintiff has already paid. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation back from Thor According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 426 has recently occurred on the plaintiff's payment.
Claims for restitution under Section 426 employees do not have the legal age limit is otherwise valid under Section 193/30 of 10 years of age will be the fourth paragraph under Section 1754, the age of the claims of creditors. You heritage be applied to the defendant in the indictment, the three of Thor The Dharma heir Liability is not when the plaintiff sued the defendant to litigation in three not out 10 years from the date the plaintiff has the right to call out to Thor (Payment on the plaintiff) the plaintiff's action does not terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6437/2550.
Plaintiffs describe action by clear and that the defendant, a child placental penetration into taking farm land disputes the plaintiff's itinerary of the estimated end action, with an area of about 4 acres, the map annexed to sue is part of the complaint and identify the claim. that the defendant, an invasion that clearly enough that a defendant understands the charges and his defense. The plaintiff to sue in this section is not ambiguous.
The plaintiff sued for share ownership in the property by the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1363, which the lawsuit is valid, such as Section 1363 of the second paragraph of that ownership is a legal act will not share ownership has a term of not more than ten years. Non-prescription The plaintiff's case does not terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6335/2550.
Retention of the defendant deducted from the wages to be paid to the plaintiff in each period is the plaintiff and the defendant as a party wishes to use as collateral damage that may arise from the construction. Therefore not as unpaid wages, the plaintiff must pay claims within two years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) claims in this case, no statute of the law specifically. The 10 year old is under 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6109/2550.
Compromise agreement Article 4 requires that if a defendant defaulted on any installment period is one month or any month. All shall be deemed in default shall allow the plaintiff immediately. When a defendant does not pay attorney's fees to the plaintiff C้harge with the compromise agreement within Article 2 on June 15, 2538 would hold that a defendant failed to pay operating debts to the plaintiff shall be allowed under the Supreme Court by then. The plaintiff has the right to force the case for the accused to an immediate agreement to compromise Clause 4, so claims to enforce payment of the plaintiff under the Supreme Court as allowed above, which has an age limit of 10 years to start from the date of June 16, 2538. not reset on July 16, 2538 which is the day following the date the defendant first failed to pay debt principal and interest to the plaintiff the first period under a compromise item a plaintiff the debt under the Supreme Court as allowed such prosecution on. July 14, 2548 expiration of 10 years and then expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6024/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the old claims, but the data breach occurred on the first 2 cases the age of one year from the date of knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. The second case, the age of ten years from the date of the violation. Which if any of these claims for damages, it is considered that terminate the. Provisions such that the age of ten years from the date of the violation of the date of the violation shall have occurred since the date of the act or omission of acts which cause more damage. The results of a violation to occur when Another day would be a violation to the date of effect of a violation occurs is different. Describe this case the plaintiff sued in June 2522 when, during the month August 2523 the two defendants by the defendant intentionally or about 2 light-headed Land Surveyors issued Certificate. The plaintiff's wrongful acts and regulations of the government scheme. Is a violation of the plaintiff causes the plaintiff has been damaged following data breach would occur at the latest on August 31, 2523 plaintiff filed on July 7, 2542, which Age ten years from the date of the abuse. Shall terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5142/2550.
When officers of the plaintiff was to investigate the facts to determine the civil liability and that the two defendants are liable for civil and report the facts to know the hierarchical superiors, and on January 8, 2544 Dec Director, Office of Highway 8, Acting Deputy Director-General. Acting Director-General of the Department of Highway Practice. Has signed a letter to the defendant to call the two together to compensate the plaintiff. Which says clearly that the defendant, one who acts in violation of the plaintiff by the defendant 2 is a title in the car cause the accident abuse, representing damages of 31,373.75 baht and the two defendants jointly liable for payment as the plaintiff. It can be the case that the Bank Director, Office of Highway 8, Acting Deputy Director-General. Acting Director-General of the Department of Highway Practice that are currently in a position representation and intent, which is the intention of the plaintiff. Be aware of abuse and know who is should be the compensation is two defendants from the date of January 8, 2544, so when plaintiffs bring this case to sue the two defendants on January 6, 2546, which period more than 1 year lawsuit plaintiff. the defendant to terminate the second is the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5140/2550.
Sat Director authorized to sign and seal the defendant's actions on behalf of the defendant, even Sat The defendant did not seal. But the book has been a liability of the defendant at the top of the page of the circumstances of S. Considers S. Agent of the defendant as the S. A letter to the state debt to the plaintiff. Constitute acts of the defendant. Get the book now contains a condition that the debt ...Ask that you reduce the price down to some more appropriate. Apply for a waiver with payment devices such as next month, so any act which no doubt shows that as the default. Accept the claim. Recognize the liability which the statute of interrupted down The new age begins from the date of this letter to sue the state debt to no more than two years on claims of the plaintiff does not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4848/2550.
The plaintiff hired the defendant promised that all three of which make a contract claim under a contract of the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (16) starting from the age, the demand for All three defendants to pay debts that the Civil and Commercial Code Section 193/12 provided that "Age and the beginning from the time that may force claims to be so ...." And Article 602, paragraph one provided that "One that shall be used to Sinhgrong when authorized to do, so when the facts did not appear that the plaintiff and the defendant has agreed to three times the wages paid to that. It must be assumed that the debt paid. It must be considered debt pay that is due when the defendant and a third award of the work done and then under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 602, paragraph one of the delivery and the delivery of work that made it appear to the fact that after the Court Chiang Mai then ruled all three satisfied the defendant and do not wish to prosecute. Show that all three defendants to the plaintiff intends to prosecute in civil court only. When the plaintiff, an attorney to prosecute the three defendants in the Court of First Instance, which is the Mai Mai and the Supreme Court on June 30, 2545 to consider the plaintiff and the defendant has delivered the third award of the contract work that already Plaintiff's right to call for Sinhgrong would happen as soon as the Supreme Court in Chiang Mai. Find tips on the best case is that the plaintiff did not appeal. Part of the plaintiff filed an answer that I believe that the plaintiff made arbitrarily The plaintiff is looking for might have set up a claim that was not When the plaintiff sued the defendant bring the case to the three on May 4, 2548 at which time more than 2 years from the date of the Supreme Court of First Instance. Terminate the plaintiff has sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 755/2550.
The plaintiff is a legal entity by the Department in the government. There shall be a representative Violation of the Age of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one must begin from the date the Director General of the representative plaintiff knew of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims.
Pm Mr. Chang is a Highway, which is the only official of the Department of plaintiff's only Not directly representative of the plaintiff, even pm Be aware of abuse and know who will should require compensation since 2539, but the Chief represented the plaintiff know the story on September 26, 2546 it held that the plaintiff knew of abuse and know who is should be the claim date. on September 26, 2546 from the date of March 12, 2547, the date has not filed the expiration of 1 year's case does not terminate the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 389/2550.
The plaintiff informed credit union defendants have agreed to the plaintiff from being a member of the defendant from the date of January 11, 2541 show that the plaintiff was aware of it should be compensation in the non-fall at the date of receiving written notice from the defendant. is the day that the plaintiff should be aware of the compensation. Because the plaintiff is injured to bring the case to court itself. No need waiting to hear instructions from the defendant. Although plaintiff may have just received notification of the defendants to know the resolution on January 21, 2541, it had no effect on the age, just starting. When plaintiffs bring the case to sue more than one year from the knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. Then terminate the under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 386/2550.
2 The plaintiff sued the defendant as the defendant violated an employer as a defendant in two of the employer violated the employment. And the three defendants jointly liable as a recipient Prauanpaicgmhun indemnity liability of the defendant and the defendant a 2, 3, is different. For the defendants 1 and 2, age of 1 year from the date the victim knew of abuse and know who will should require compensation under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the defendant to 3 age of 2 years from the date of casualty, according Article 882, paragraph one at the age of the lawsuit accused the first of two defendants to three can be separated from each other under section 295 given age as you or a penalty only to the debtor who is accused of three can not be lifted prescription Section 448, paragraph one of the battle.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 321/2550.
Claims data in which the offense punishable under the Penal Code. Which the criminal statute of longer under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph two, meaning only the claims of male perpetrators or participants in the offense in particular. Does not mean others are not involved in the offense with Claim 2, which took the defendant to an employer. It requires a prescription under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one, when the accused 2 to the fight that the reason this case occurred on February 20, 2542, but the plaintiff to sue for damages in case of violation on April 22, 2545 after the birth. Why waste for 3 years then terminate the plaintiff sued. Would express to terminate the cause of that is understandable. Violation from the date of the accident until the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit to terminate the first year and then to the defendant's words are like the two with the Code of Civil Procedure Section 177, paragraph two cases for two defendants, so the issue of prescription
Judgement of the Supreme Court 307/2550.
Actions to be offense to Act offenses arising from the use of check BE 2534, Section 4 shall be issued checks to pay off debt and forced to exist under the law. Which is an element of the offense. Not only details that can attest to the floor. Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant, but only that the check for payment under the contract a copy of liability and liability for the end of action. Thus describe the lack of action component fault Because of the liability does not cause a new debt. Just cause, age, interrupted only down. Plaintiff's complaint is not legitimate. Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 204/2550.
Because of the state debt, which interrupted the prescription to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) if the debtor must be made to creditors. The plaintiff, a creditor to deduct a credit to the defendant, a debtor is not in accordance with the provisions section such conditions. The first part of the defendant to return plaintiff's part, it is used as the right to party. Not show that the defendant admitted that a plaintiff is a debt unpaid. Not considered an admission that the plaintiff's liability as well. Age does not make a seamless stop.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 101/2550.
Two defendants made compromise agreement with the bank and the court sentenced the give notice that an agreed settlement principal and interest within six months from the date of the compromise agreement clause 2 agreed to pay the court did not order back and attorneys' fees 5,000 within March 9, 2538 and Article 3, if the defendant failed to pay debts or fails to comply with any of the contract shall be deemed in default and allow all to immediate execution. When the defendant did not have to pay obligations under clause 2, within days of March 9, 2538 shall be deemed in default and the bank can force the case immediately under Article 3, so old and have to start from the date of March 10, 2538, not counting the date of 9. August 2538 after six months from the date of the compromise agreement because the defendant fails to pay debt principal and interest as a plaintiff's contracts, the transferee bank claims on the prosecution on May 9, 2548 more than 10 years and then expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 17/2550.
1 to 3, the defendant entered into the guarantee of S. By allowing liability associated with S. The fourth defendant as the husband of the defendant to three to allow the defendant to 3 to guarantee agreement with the defendant guilty and accept the 3 Sat The plaintiff employee was the plaintiff's misappropriation of funds. And a letter to the liability that the plaintiff will pay the first installment on August 5, 2537 as the liability of S. Is liable under an employment agreement which has no law on age, specifically has defined 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 period begins from the date of the accident fraudulent misappropriation on January 14, 2536, but when SatA letter to the liability to the plaintiff for repayment refunded to the plaintiff the first installment of 200,000 baht on August 5, 2537 of the state debt that has to age, interrupted it with the time pass away before it does not count in the age The. According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) and Section 193/15 and age, that stumble into this would have stopped a penalty for the four defendants who are guaranteed by the Civil and Commercial code Section 692 of the state case for products liability under Section 193/35 of 2 years of age, which later appeared on Sat No first payment to the plaintiff on August 5, 2537 as the liability to. Because the prescription is interrupted to terminate on such date. And one begins from the date of August 6, 2537 onwards, the plaintiff filed the case on April 9, 2537 on the date of August 6, 2537, a day after the start of a new age not exceeding 10 years can not terminate the plaintiff's case.
The Supreme Court 9009 - 9014/2549.
The plaintiff sued the six lectures. Dismissal of the plaintiff and the defendant by the plaintiff's six-six, which are not offenders dismissal unfair to force defendants to pay damages for the dismissal unfair not to sue the defendant to pay wages or damages arising from the contract. is not paid or otherwise an age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/34, but that is the case filed a claim for damages arising from unfair dismissal under the Labour Court and Procedure BE 2522, Section 49, which has no law specifically to their age. Has an age limit of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8696/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages to the plaintiff would occupy a taxi. The plaintiff lessor to lack of interest that should be taken from the leased property to rent out the grounds for termination from the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. Despite a 400 baht per day, the same rate as the rent. But it is a legal action against the lack of benefit from the use of a rental property, not to sue unpaid. This case, the Civil and Commercial Code does not specifically prescribe prescription. Has an age limit of ten years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8694/2549.
Enforcement officers announced the property by public auction to the terms of the price and terms that Buyer Sub to pay the rest within 15 days from the date of purchase onwards the 15 days given to buyers of Property to the remaining funds to pay under the contract that is the time set for repayment Non-prescription, as required by law that the parties will agree to abstain or not to extend or shorten according to the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/11 of the property and the buyers enforcement officers agreed extension of time deposit the rest. Another is to find a violation of the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 510 and 515 do not, there is no legal reason that the court may issue an order to revoke the order and auction of enforcement officers. This case. Like the court to order raised by the petition of the defendant need not investigate
The Supreme Court 8242 - 8246/2549.
1 to 3, the plaintiff sued a bonus under an employment agreement which, by the Labour Protection Act BE 2541, Section 5 defined the term "wages" means money that employers and employees agreed to pay as compensation for working under contract for a period of normal operation ... And the word "overtime" means money paid by the employer to an employee in return for working overtime on a weekday. Although overtime is not paid as defined above. It is not money that employers pay to employees in return for normal functioning of the working day. However, it is money that employers pay compensation for work outside normal time. Commitments which the employer must pay to the employee under an employment agreement. Sinhgrong considered by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 575, overtime is based on one Civil and Commercial Code Section 193 / 34 (9), the age of 2 years of litigation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7875/2549.
The purpose of the plaintiff Housing Supplies business machine business. Furniture, electrical equipment, including spare parts and accessories of such goods. The plaintiff sold the furniture to equipment categories that a defendant has a business purpose or operation of the plaintiff that the defendant is a business hotel. The defendant to a machine shop type of furniture from the plaintiff is to be used in the business of the defendant at a hotel which is the business of the defendant went to an exception under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) Therefore, the plaintiff take legal action cost products Furniture owed by a defendant, there was an age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7611/2549.
The plaintiff filed a lack of benefit from the use of a rental car after the lease break. The lease does not take legal action. The plaintiff sued in the lack of benefit from the use of car hire age of 10 years of age, 2 years, not as a second petition, so the defendant claims the lack of utilization of a car lease will not terminate the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6785/2549.
According to the Civil and Commercial Code and Compensation Act, tax on export production in the Kingdom. Age is not provided in the case of claims under this specifically. Plaintiff's claims against two defendants who are 10 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Section. 193/30 plaintiff's claim does not terminate the recovery Windfall should not be.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5996/2549.
Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 states that "the age to start from the time the claim may be forced on. If it claims to abstain to act in any way. To start from the time of the first violation of the act "when listening to the fact that the Central Labour Court that a defendant by the second defendant had agreed verbally with the Plaintiff that If the plaintiff can be detected fraud and corruption proceeds returned to the defendant that a plaintiff may receive special consideration. When it appears that the plaintiff has detected fraud and to cause the defendant to a lawsuit Thai Bank of Commerce Limited (Thailand) and Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited () even on 31 March 2546 the defendant, a recovery of 9,403,007.63 Baht conditions. verbal agreement may force the defendant claims that a special compensation payment from the under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 find products from the date of October 15, 2544 which is on the plaintiff resigned from being an employee. of a defendant when the plaintiff is not a regular employee filed a special fee per cent of the work done. Thus demanding compensation for working under an employment agreement with an agreed work done in the normal working hours of the workday, which pay Is the claim that the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (9), the plaintiff filed an action in the Central Labour Court on May 6, 2547 is not the expiration of 2 years from the date of March 31. 2546, which date shall be entitled to claim. Does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5994/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant, the employer, the employee to pay debts arising from the defendant guilty of the employment agreement by the plaintiff to withdraw the product and then do not return the books, the liability to the plaintiff. Is the case, the plaintiff sued the defendant to liability under the employment agreement. Not to sue the defendant liable under the liability book. But the defendant claimed that a letter has been a liability for evidence that the defendant was guilty of an employment agreement with the only Such debt does not have the old law specifically so the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5201/2549.
The defendant hired someone building a building. In this regard, a defendant ordered plaintiff's employment from the plaintiff and zinc roof building If it falls into force of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) at the end of that Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. So the old claims of the plaintiff is a period of 5 years from the time payment is due on the defaulted defendant to a lawsuit until the expiration of 5 years not to sue does not terminate the plaintiff.
The plaintiff handed over the roof to install a defendant after that when it rains the roof leaks and turn off when the wind hit. , Which defects, which should not be found, while on authorized. The plaintiff is a defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the first defendant had paid the Sidhiiึdhnnyong only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff has not completed repairs to a defendant to withhold it like it was Sinhgrong.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5033/2549.
Labour Protection Act, BE 2541, Section 125, paragraph one provided that "When the Labor Inspector can issue an order under section 124 if the employer, employee or The Dharma heir of the employee who has died are not satisfied that order to bring the case to court within 30 days from the date of the order," which is to set up. bring the case to court under the provisions of these is scheduled to bring a lawsuit. Age is not the right to claim any right to bring the case to the court in accordance with Act on Establishment of Labour Court and Labour Court Procedure BE 2522, Section 8 (4) is subject to Section 26 of the Act which provided that "Period, as defined in this Act or by the Labour Court has set. Labour Court has the power to shorten or extend as necessary and in the interest of justice ", so the time for filing such cases can shorten or extend as necessary and in the interest of justice.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4998/2549.
The lawsuit asked to revoke acts of mortgage redemption. Mortgage and sale of the land back to the plaintiff is the owner of the property monitoring and regain their property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1336, there is no set prescription.
The fourth defendant to purchase the land leave the disputed amount to 2,500,000 baht already sees that The only power of attorney signed by the plaintiff which has no authority to make that message and not given anything to fill in the proxy The plaintiff did not agree with. Is caused by gross negligence of the defendant to four naive own fraud of the defendant that a plaintiff is not the result of manipulation or allow a defendant accused of manipulation itself as a representative of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not responsible for the defendant to four under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 821, 822, so the defendant to one has no right to the land of the plaintiff to register sale of the defendant to four acts of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant, 4 do not like and do not bind plaintiff The plaintiff shall be entitled to recoup the tracking of their assets from people who have no right to take it. The plaintiff then sued for the revocation of acts of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant was 4.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4997/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendants both jointly fraud plaintiffs to purchase leave the land of the defendant to a cause plaintiff's trust and lost money to the two defendants to 1,500,000 Baht and a request forcing the two defendants together the money to the plaintiff. U.S. 1,500,000 was deposited the purchase price of the land granted to the plaintiff both to the defendant. Non-violation complaint in the age of one year only. But with the right track out of the plaintiff's property back from two defendants who have no right to rely on the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1336 by which time the property owner does not exercise this The interest of such money damages, which is considered the plaintiff's motion for a civil action relating to the criminal offense of fraud. The plaintiff in the prosecution of criminal cases is not absolute. Does not terminate the according Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 51 paragraph two.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4857/2549.
Car repair contract that the plaintiff, the defendant made a contract of 2 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1).
The plaintiff delivered the car to anyone who is ready to fix the car then. The plaintiff may enforce their rights in a claim to the defendant to pay Sinhgrong counted from the date of delivery of each vehicle, which led to the expense. The defendant used the money to pay debts for some of the plaintiff. Thus the liability to the plaintiff. Interrupted to make the old and the new age begins from that date. According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) and Section 193/15.
Plaintiff's debt to 41 items, the total amount of 402,197 baht, which the plaintiff can enforce their rights before the date of May 8, 2541 filed on 19 June 2543, more than two years ago sued the plaintiff in this section and so terminate. The more debt the repairs to 11 of 47,500 baht appears that on May 8, 2543, the date the defendant to pay some debts. Debt repairs and 11 do not terminate the list. Prescription for such debt must begin recount And when calculated up to no more than two years to sue the plaintiff in 11 cases this is not terminate the.
Of the state debt which will cause the prescription will be interrupted to terminate the action before the debt. When the repairs of debt 402,197 to terminate the U.S. since before the May 8, 2541 partial settlement of the defendant on such date, there is no interruption of the prescription is stopped.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4787/2549.
Plaintiff to travel from Bangkok to Udon Thani on July 25, 2541 at which the defendant should be delivered to the plaintiff lost luggage. Prescription shall begin from that date. Although the plaintiff may bring a lawsuit on August 9, 2542, which set out a year ago, but on November 13, 2541 defendant sent a letter to the plaintiff agrees to compensate it for damages amounting to U.S. $ 400, although not full amount the plaintiff claims. It is a book for state debt. The result was a life interrupted by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) When the plaintiff to the lawsuit filed on August 9, 2542 and will not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4786/2549.
The prosecution asked the child is a child the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1556, paragraph three states that achieve the conditions in which children will need to bring a lawsuit within one year from the date of legal age. Appears as a birth certificate and a copy of that registration. The singer was born on May 24, 2512 petitioner filed this lawsuit on October 20, 2546 when the petitioner has 34 years of age, thus applying after the expiration of one year from the date of legal age. Cases of so terminate the petitioner. Although petitioner claimed that the dead will not deny that petitioner was not a child is no dispute about the rights or duties under the law, and when they die, then death. Petitioner to obtain family allowance Council members But officials are not committed to. Claim that there is no evidence that the petitioner is a legitimate child of the deceased. Is a hindrance to the recent dispute the right of the petitioner. Petitioner must be exercised by the Court for an order that the petitioner is the legitimate child of the deceased in accordance with How to Code of Civil Denis Section 55, but any exercise of the court of the petitioner is also required under the provisions of these ages with Petitioner claimed that the petitioner would have just been the right argument. Not terminate the case for no.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4206/2549.
Act on the Carriage of Goods by Sea BE 2534, Section 46 applies only if the sender or the consignee sued the carrier's liability for damages for the loss. Damage or delay in delivery of the contract of carriage by carriage of goods by sea only.
The plaintiff sued the defendant hired the plaintiff's delivery to the customer of the plaintiff in Saudi Arabia. The defendant represented the plaintiff. The defendant liable because of shipping documents to the end customer agreement delayed The customer acceptance only Plaintiff claimed that the defendant is a marine transportation and the defendant's liability for loss reason. Damage or delay in delivery of goods during the carriage of goods in the custody of the accused under Section 39 of the Act, Carriage of Goods by Sea BE 2534 the provisions of Section 46 shall not apply to. However, because the Act does not prescribe on prescription in this case. Must be provisions on the liability of the agent according to P.Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1,Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1, Be applied, but P.Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1 Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1, Civil and Commercial Book 1, Title 6 Chapter 2 that with age, they have not provided their age in this particular case and as such. Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 know when the plaintiff on December 8, 2544 that the defendants guilty Agreement customers can not pick up soon cause damage. Determines that such date is the day that the plaintiff may enforce the right to claim damages from the defendants. And after the date the plaintiff to sue within 10 years and do not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3648/2549.
Tort Liability Act Officer BE 2539, Section 5 is the state agency is liable to victims of abuse in the results of their actions, officials in the performance. The injured party may sue the government directly. But officials would not sue. The case is the plaintiff, a police department to take recourse to sue the two defendants, a police official. Because the two defendants made the duty of the representatives of the plaintiff, a corporate cause damage to others. And the plaintiff is liable to pay compensation for such damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 76, paragraph one, the plaintiff has the power to sue And the age of 10 years.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3314/2549.
Although the plaintiff is a trader's call for the delivery of which was 2 years old and under Section 193/34 (a) matter, but at the end of this section, provided the case is an exception that is not in the age of 2. that year unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. The need to consider the affairs of the debtor that kind of a business case. The two defendants buying fuel from the plaintiff to the buses. The two defendants operate offshore transport of passengers and cargo. Would hold that the two defendants from the plaintiff to buy fuel in the affairs of the two defendants. Which is to be the case with the exception Not in the age of 2 years by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1), but the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3097/2549.
The defendant requested an open letter of credit to the plaintiff, a commercial bank to purchase goods from suppliers abroad. And give credit to the plaintiff by the defendant, a payment on behalf of the defendant before such a service is a type of commercial bank loans only. Yes, it is the case for the plaintiff to a business or a business administrator of a defendant or the defendant to structures instead of one under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) No it can not be taken. age of 2 years under these provisions shall apply in the case. And the defendant, a letter of credit agreement with the plaintiff but the defendant can not pay a debt to the plaintiff under the contract, letters of credit. Has entered into an agreement with the plaintiff's trust receipts to obtain documents from the plaintiff to pick up the goods before. The plaintiff will pay later. Later, a defendant who has not received goods to pay the plaintiff the defendant owe the plaintiff has a contractual agreement, which trust receipts, which continued to contract, letters of credit. Obligations under the contract for trust receipts are currently no law on age, especially The 10 year old would under Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2983/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable under a contract for opening letters of credit. This is the case, the plaintiff must bind directly to the supplier, the beneficiary under letters of credit. The plaintiff is not the business of the structures to which a defendant and then call for a Sinhgrong will receive funds, including advances to the plaintiff was released before a defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7). liable to prosecution under the contract for opening letters of credit law does not specifically define the age. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Defendant to a contract for opening letters of credit with the plaintiff but the defendant can not pay a debt to the plaintiff under the contract for opening letters of credit. Has entered into an agreement with the plaintiff's trust receipts to obtain documents from the plaintiff to obtain the product first and then make a payment to the plaintiff after Later, the defendant, not a product to receive payment in full by the plaintiff. Debt under trust receipts are not indebted to the business of governance of others or for the various tasks which call for Wage will receive from it. And advance funds issued by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) When the law does not specifically define the age. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 paragraph means that the unpaid interest that would terminate the portion of more than 5 years from the filing date back. The interest owed is not more than five years and expire. The plaintiff has the right to demand interest on arrears from the date of filing back down to no more than 5 years.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2880/2549.
Revenue Code Section 19 provisions to set up a Tax Authority is empowered to issue the summons filed by the investigation and issue a summons to witness To order the submission of evidence that the items or account Documents or proofs to be on the show. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that any person listed in the form of submission of incorrect or incomplete truth. Through the issuance of a summons must be made within two years from the date of the filing of the list. And if that is the case, the Director-General to approve the extension of time to issue a subpoena, it shall not exceed five years from the date of submission of the list. If the expiration of this will affect not only the Tax Authority the power to issue a summons to the subsequent investigation. And issue a summons to testify to order the submission of witness lists or the documents or other evidence to show only Yes, it is for the provision of age to claim the tax not paid. The issuance of a summons to the person who is responsible for the business tax under Section 91/21 (5) subject to the provisions of section 88 shall apply mutatis mutandis. The authority of the Tax Authority is not subject to section 19 by section in the statute of the Civil and Commercial Law Section 193/31 of the state that claims to call for tax to the age of 10 years, official assessment. has the authority to assess taxes from the plaintiff within the period of 10 years from the due date that the plaintiff must file a list of specific business tax. When the time is still in the Age of the assessment officer shall assess the plaintiff only has to pay business tax.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2542/2549.
The plaintiff claims filed by residents raised primarily of charges that Deposited at the defendant to the plaintiff. Later, someone else is a fake signature of the plaintiff's withdrawal from the account of the plaintiff. Committed by the defendant negligently allowed to withdraw. The plaintiff has been damaged. The defendant liable for payment of the plaintiff to be withdrawn with interest. Plaintiff's motion for such a look is deposited into the defendant returned the deposit agreement. Although the plaintiff may sue to describe the negligence of the defendant is to show that Defendant may be liable to the plaintiff for not fulfilling duties to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 659, paragraph three states only. Find the right to sue in the data, which violated the age of 1 year, the defendant did not petition. Claims for refund under the deposit law has no statute of the particular Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2058/2549.
The plaintiff the defendant made an agreement to buy land title deed No. 15658, and has purchased land dispute, a road adjacent to the land on May 20, 2519 to the date of 19 December 2521 the defendant registered the transfer of land title deed No. 15658. the plaintiff under an agreement to buy and to sell the land payments to the plaintiff some Considered the liability under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) age, would stop tripping. Time does not pass away before the to the prescription, and begins a new life since the age of reason that interrupted to end the Civil and Commercial Section 193/15 agreement to buy and to sell it without prescription by law. therefore only the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 and the new age begins from the date of 20 December 2521 on 27 October 2530 the defendant received a letter that the amount of 50,000 baht from the plaintiff the value of the land. the road as the purchase and sale agreement dated May 20, 2519 the balance will be paid to the date of the transfer agreement. Text in the book indicate that the defendant has been that the debt must be transferred as part of the land to the plaintiff on the other road. It is a book for liability under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) the age, interrupted by another one. Time to pass before the count is not added to their age. And begins a new prescription from the date of October 18, 2530 onwards from the date of October 22, 2540 the plaintiff to prosecute this case no more than 10 years, it has not terminate the plaintiff.
Abolishment is not ratified by the parties and stakeholders anyone would raise a waste of abolishment was claimed also by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 172, paragraph one problem that an agreement to buy land disputes is void. or not. It is a problem concerning the public order. Although the defendant does not raise this issue in the Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal. Defendant also has the right to raise this issue in the petition by the class. Civil Procedure Code, Section 249, paragraph two, even disputed land is part of the road in the village where the defendant is the operator of the land and fall into the load. Yield for the benefit of land allocated according to the National Executive Council No. 286, but even the yield load, but the owner Phan network. Property must accept karma, some which affect their property or to refrain from the exercise of certain assets which are in ownership of the property to benefit another Phan and do not own network. Property of any karma that will cause the interest of reducing to servitude or the loss of carrying out the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1387 and 1389 only network Phan property owner also owns the property. The laws do not prohibit the owner Phan network. Property for sale or distribution, sale or transfer in any way. The defendant as owner of the land dispute has the right to sell the disputed land. Agreement to buy land dispute can not be null and void. Defendant disputed land must be transferred to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1802/2549.
Insurance trig of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 887 is one of life insurance. Which provided separately in Section 3 of Chapter 2, age of the recipient Insurance trig liability litigation. Must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 882, which provided a general provisions in Part 1 of the same category. Which the prescribed age limit by then. Therefore not comparable to that provided in the case of life insurance and other categories may not be a general under Section 193/30 of age shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case have Prauanpaicgmhun.
Call the recipient to liability claims Insurance trig the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 887, paragraph two states that "the injured party would like to receive the compensation they should have it directly from the insurer ...Etc. "The plaintiff has the right to sue defendants 4 to liability claims by not required to hold the intention to take advantage of the previous contract. The age of litigation under section 882, paragraph one of the states prohibited from prosecution after the expiration of two years from the date of casualty is the law specifically provides that from the date of the casualty. It can not apply the general principles of the age, under Section 193/12 comes into force apply to this case or be interpreted as something else, so when the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit expiration of two years from the date of casualty, the plaintiff in the case of the defendant. 4, then terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 667/2549.
Although overdraft loan agreement, the Agreement to add overdraft loan, which must also account the nature of the contract will not be scheduled. Account contracts, independent agreement that is unique. The contract will maintain a go on it must be widespread and ongoing accounting within a reasonable time. Facts show that pharmacist. Bringing the money into accounts for less Thon, which circulate in the final account on 14 March 2526 and there is no accounting for current account and stuff from the pharmacist on. Died a long time, almost 12 years show that pharmacist. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default then. The plaintiff is a financial institution is required to monitor the client's account at all times that what is moving. When it appears that the pharmacist. The plaintiff's customers no account activity. The plaintiff would have to call or terminate the contract in a reasonable time. Marks are not the right thinking long-term interest in this unreasonable. Considered that the use of the rights of the plaintiff does not act in good faith. The contract is considered closed in from the pharmacist. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default is the date of 14 March 2526 at which pharmacist. Circulate the final accounting. Claims of the plaintiff to recover under overdraft had happened since then. Claims under the age of 10 years is scheduled to bring the case to the plaintiff to sue on February 5, 2539 expiration of 10 years for loans under the agreement terminate the account so. However, it appears that pharmacist. Brought land and built mortgaged as collateral for such debt in the amount of 5,500,000 baht plus interest at a rate of 15 percent per year with an agreement that if the plaintiff shall mortgage money is not enough debt to allow forced out of the property. until the end, even as other obligations under the contract will terminate the account. However, if required by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 745 and Section 193/27 is the plaintiff, the mortgagee will require repayment of the mortgage assets, even when the mortgage debt that is insured, then terminate the time. But are forced to pay the interest owed over the past five years can not And constant force, but only property pharmacist.Mortgage only. Will be required from other property not more than five. Even though the mortgage agreement is determined to force out of other assets until the end. If force is not enough money to pay the mortgage debt even.
(Meeting No. 3 / 2548).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 142/2549.
Claims incurred by the compromise agreement with the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/32, whether claims are the same age, how much the second defendant, a breach of contract and the compromise on October 10. 2539 plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 29, 2542 to no more than 10 years and do not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8712/2548.
The provisions of Section 193/33 and 193/34 section of the Civil and Commercial Code. Despite the age, demanding the same salary, but Section 193 / 34 (9) If an employee is called out of money by working under an employment agreement from your employer. Employer or employers run out of money due from the employee to return from the Section 193/33 (4) is not the case that the other employees call for salary payment types. From those who have the responsibility to pay. Which is scheduled to pay in time. The plaintiff sued the employee, the employer called the defendant to pay the salary and accommodation rights under the employment agreement, which is 2 years old and under Section 193/34 (9), not 5 years under Section 193/33 (4).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8007/2548.
Debt arising from the debtor, a corporate business purpose the hotel kitchen equipment with the installation of creditors. Perpetrated for profit in the business of the debtor to continue. Therefore the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) of section 193 / 34 (1).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7656/2548.
1 defendant received a letter of liability to the plaintiff on May 13, 2540 by the plaintiff that a debt loan is 60,000 baht as evidence of the effect of loans in writing and in writing with the state debt. The loans are no legal age limit of particular Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of the book debts without the condition, age, in itself, but with age, resulting in debt to the original interrupted. When the date of May 13, 2540 until October 24, 2544, the date the plaintiff to prosecute within 10 years can not terminate the.
The liability of the debtor if debtor is not the fault condition after the debt is old enough to terminate the life of two years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/35.
Section 193/10 right to terminate the call. Debtor is entitled. To refuse to pay debts by such claims.
Section 193/11 of the age specified by law that the parties will agree to abstain or extend or shorten impervious
Section 193/12 age, to start from the time that could force right. Claim on. If it claims to refrain from acting. Any to start from the first time against the acts that
Section 193/13 claims that creditors may not be enforceable unless Will demand repayment before the debtors. To start from the beginning at age. May be the first to call on. If the debtor does not pay until the debt. Over a period of time will have been Enyongpogn. From the time of the call. To start from age, from that time period then ended.
Section 193/14 age, would stop, tripped in the following.
(1) Accounts receivable for liability to creditors in accordance with claims made by. Book debts for the state. Payments to some of the security interest or any other action. Without a doubt shows a default. Agree that the liability claim.
(2) creditors have to set the evidence to bring a lawsuit or claim for repayment.
(3), creditors have filed an application for repayment in bankruptcy cases.
(4) creditors have given the dispute to arbitration.
(5) creditors have acted any other effect is the same with the prosecution.
Section 193/15 at the age of interrupted down. Time pass Before does not count in the limitation
When the reason for the prescription to end any time interrupted. To start from age The new since that time.
Section 193/16 of the debt or the debt, according to data. Creditors will receive Debt occasionally creditor claims the debtor a letter to the state Debt at any time prior to the age of abundant evidence. That age, the interruption stopped.
Section 193/17 in the case of age, interrupted a reason under Section 193/14 (2) If the case has made a final judgment to raise the complaint. Or disposal of cases completed by the reason to withdraw the case filed or Leave to sue. Age, shall be deemed not to have interrupted.
If the court does not accept the case. Or return or to address the complaint, why the case. Not in the jurisdiction Or the court to address the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice the right to sue New and appear due to age, then under consideration. Or will mature within sixty days from the date of sentence or order. The ultimate The creditors have the right to bring a lawsuit to set the evidence claims. Or to make payment within sixty days from the date of sentence or Order that the most
Section 193/18 to 193/17 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case. Prescription interrupted a reason under Section 193/14 (3) (4) and (5), mutatis mutandis.
Section 193/19 while the age of maturity beyond reason that if the act prevents creditors under Section 193/14 of the age, it is not due out until thirty days from the date Force Majeure is terminated.
Section 193/20 prescription claims of minors or of The court may order a person of unsound mind shall be incompetent or not. If you are due to the time that such person has not the ability groups. Full landscape or within one year from the date on which such person does not delegate The legitimacy or guardian. Age, it is not due until. Will be one year from the date on which that person has the ability to group or for the full landscape. Representatives for election or guardian has the case may be, but if the prescription Claims that a period of less than one year. , Then the period. The shorter the term is used instead of the one year.
Section 193/21 prescription claims of minors or of Or quasi-incompetent. To sue Representatives for election or guardian, or custodian of it if they will mature as a person in the group is not full to capacity landscape. Or within one year from the date on which such person does not like a representative of the fair or guardian. Or guardian. Age, are not yet due. Until one year. From the date on which that person has the ability to full group. Representatives for election landscape or a guardian or curator, or the case may be, but if the prescription claims for a period of less than one year. It led to a shorter period of the replacement period. One of the year.
Section 193/22 prescription claims between the husband and wife if the first is due. Or within one year from the date the marriage ended. Age, it is not due until one year after the date. Marriage ends.
Section 193/23 prescription claims which you or the death penalty if the person is due within one year from the date of death, age, are not yet due until one year from the date of death.
Section 193/24 at the age of matured debts are taking advantage of the age of the lost time. But taking such advantage of this. Do not prejudice the rights of any third party or a guarantor.
Section 193/25 at the age of matured To be retroactive Date up to the prescription
Section 193/26 on claims the president is missing. Age of the claims as part of the device terminate with Although the age of the claims of the device is not even due.
Section 193/27 mortgagee recipients who pledged or persons who The right to withhold over the assets of the debtor. Which they can rely on are still there. Entitled to enforce payment of the mortgage property or take them to. Although claims of the president will then terminate the matter. But the exercise is forced to pay the interest accrued over the past five years can not
Section 193/28 of the debt-claim, which does not expire and then that much is irrecoverable. Although the settlement will Claims do not know, then terminate the matter.
The provisions of paragraph one. Shall apply to the condition of the debtor. Liability evidence in writing or by providing insurance, but will refer to this as a punishment for the same is not guaranteed.
Section 193/29 when I'm lifting the statute of the court as a defense. Remove old claim the dismissal came as a result can not
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5690/2552.
The defendant registered the plaintiff's divorce for the purpose of taxation, but still living. And dependent care as well as divorce is not the intention to deceive with the equation between knowledge of the divorce would be void under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 155 complaint, the plaintiff's claim that the divorce is invalid and ask to share assets that do not find it. Thus for the management of Marriage property with which the defendant has the right to request as long as the plaintiff. As far as the plaintiff and the defendant still has the same status as husband and wife. This is not the case and claims that must be done within the time prescribed by law under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 9.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 134/2551.
Loan agreement is an agreement that Defendant committed to the principal and the interest back to the plaintiff. By installments a month months 5,000 Baht as prosecution claims the defendant to pay the interest with principal under loan agreements are considered to be a call for interest with principal to finance the cost back as installments which have an age limit of the five-year According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 (2) (Section 166 originally), not the absence of legal provisions which require 10 years of age, under Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8419/2550.
Public of land disputes is for people to share. Who have no ownership or possessory right to use lean against the state and did not revoke the decree is also a public interest for people to share. But those who occupy land in dispute shall be entitled to better than others.
The plaintiff is a land dispute. Although the plaintiff does not have ownership or possessory right because it is the public. But the plaintiff in a land dispute shall be entitled to better Buy only the defendant's house to the shareholders of the plaintiff enforcement offices not allow the demolition of such houses from the land dispute is the plaintiff's right to dispute. The plaintiff sued the defendant has the authority to demolish the house from a land dispute.
The plaintiff is a land dispute, which is for people to share public of the plaintiff shall be entitled to better than the defendant and the defendant is not taking possession from the plaintiff. Defendant has raised the age of 1 year from the taking of possession. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1375 paragraph two, as a defense to the plaintiff that the plaintiff's action does not terminate the search.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7552/2550.
Thor Driving in the employ of the plaintiff's employer, who was Thor's car crash Insured to the Company that. Have been damaged after Thor The plaintiff claims to know of the death sentence the Supreme Court sentenced the plaintiff to pay to a Bank And Wor. And the plaintiff has already paid. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation back from Thor According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 426 has recently occurred on the plaintiff's payment.
Claims for restitution under Section 426 employees do not have the legal age limit is otherwise valid under Section 193/30 of 10 years of age will be the fourth paragraph under Section 1754, the age of the claims of creditors. You heritage be applied to the defendant in the indictment, the three of Thor The Dharma heir Liability is not when the plaintiff sued the defendant to litigation in three not out 10 years from the date the plaintiff has the right to call out to Thor (Payment on the plaintiff) the plaintiff's action does not terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6437/2550.
Plaintiffs describe action by clear and that the defendant, a child placental penetration into taking farm land disputes the plaintiff's itinerary of the estimated end action, with an area of about 4 acres, the map annexed to sue is part of the complaint and identify the claim. that the defendant, an invasion that clearly enough that a defendant understands the charges and his defense. The plaintiff to sue in this section is not ambiguous.
The plaintiff sued for share ownership in the property by the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1363, which the lawsuit is valid, such as Section 1363 of the second paragraph of that ownership is a legal act will not share ownership has a term of not more than ten years. Non-prescription The plaintiff's case does not terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6335/2550.
Retention of the defendant deducted from the wages to be paid to the plaintiff in each period is the plaintiff and the defendant as a party wishes to use as collateral damage that may arise from the construction. Therefore not as unpaid wages, the plaintiff must pay claims within two years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) claims in this case, no statute of the law specifically. The 10 year old is under 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6109/2550.
Compromise agreement Article 4 requires that if a defendant defaulted on any installment period is one month or any month. All shall be deemed in default shall allow the plaintiff immediately. When a defendant does not pay attorney's fees to the plaintiff C้harge with the compromise agreement within Article 2 on June 15, 2538 would hold that a defendant failed to pay operating debts to the plaintiff shall be allowed under the Supreme Court by then. The plaintiff has the right to force the case for the accused to an immediate agreement to compromise Clause 4, so claims to enforce payment of the plaintiff under the Supreme Court as allowed above, which has an age limit of 10 years to start from the date of June 16, 2538. not reset on July 16, 2538 which is the day following the date the defendant first failed to pay debt principal and interest to the plaintiff the first period under a compromise item a plaintiff the debt under the Supreme Court as allowed such prosecution on. July 14, 2548 expiration of 10 years and then expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6024/2550.
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the old claims, but the data breach occurred on the first 2 cases the age of one year from the date of knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. The second case, the age of ten years from the date of the violation. Which if any of these claims for damages, it is considered that terminate the. Provisions such that the age of ten years from the date of the violation of the date of the violation shall have occurred since the date of the act or omission of acts which cause more damage. The results of a violation to occur when Another day would be a violation to the date of effect of a violation occurs is different. Describe this case the plaintiff sued in June 2522 when, during the month August 2523 the two defendants by the defendant intentionally or about 2 light-headed Land Surveyors issued Certificate. The plaintiff's wrongful acts and regulations of the government scheme. Is a violation of the plaintiff causes the plaintiff has been damaged following data breach would occur at the latest on August 31, 2523 plaintiff filed on July 7, 2542, which Age ten years from the date of the abuse. Shall terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5142/2550.
When officers of the plaintiff was to investigate the facts to determine the civil liability and that the two defendants are liable for civil and report the facts to know the hierarchical superiors, and on January 8, 2544 Dec Director, Office of Highway 8, Acting Deputy Director-General. Acting Director-General of the Department of Highway Practice. Has signed a letter to the defendant to call the two together to compensate the plaintiff. Which says clearly that the defendant, one who acts in violation of the plaintiff by the defendant 2 is a title in the car cause the accident abuse, representing damages of 31,373.75 baht and the two defendants jointly liable for payment as the plaintiff. It can be the case that the Bank Director, Office of Highway 8, Acting Deputy Director-General. Acting Director-General of the Department of Highway Practice that are currently in a position representation and intent, which is the intention of the plaintiff. Be aware of abuse and know who is should be the compensation is two defendants from the date of January 8, 2544, so when plaintiffs bring this case to sue the two defendants on January 6, 2546, which period more than 1 year lawsuit plaintiff. the defendant to terminate the second is the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5140/2550.
Sat Director authorized to sign and seal the defendant's actions on behalf of the defendant, even Sat The defendant did not seal. But the book has been a liability of the defendant at the top of the page of the circumstances of S. Considers S. Agent of the defendant as the S. A letter to the state debt to the plaintiff. Constitute acts of the defendant. Get the book now contains a condition that the debt ...Ask that you reduce the price down to some more appropriate. Apply for a waiver with payment devices such as next month, so any act which no doubt shows that as the default. Accept the claim. Recognize the liability which the statute of interrupted down The new age begins from the date of this letter to sue the state debt to no more than two years on claims of the plaintiff does not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4848/2550.
The plaintiff hired the defendant promised that all three of which make a contract claim under a contract of the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (16) starting from the age, the demand for All three defendants to pay debts that the Civil and Commercial Code Section 193/12 provided that "Age and the beginning from the time that may force claims to be so ...." And Article 602, paragraph one provided that "One that shall be used to Sinhgrong when authorized to do, so when the facts did not appear that the plaintiff and the defendant has agreed to three times the wages paid to that. It must be assumed that the debt paid. It must be considered debt pay that is due when the defendant and a third award of the work done and then under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 602, paragraph one of the delivery and the delivery of work that made it appear to the fact that after the Court Chiang Mai then ruled all three satisfied the defendant and do not wish to prosecute. Show that all three defendants to the plaintiff intends to prosecute in civil court only. When the plaintiff, an attorney to prosecute the three defendants in the Court of First Instance, which is the Mai Mai and the Supreme Court on June 30, 2545 to consider the plaintiff and the defendant has delivered the third award of the contract work that already Plaintiff's right to call for Sinhgrong would happen as soon as the Supreme Court in Chiang Mai. Find tips on the best case is that the plaintiff did not appeal. Part of the plaintiff filed an answer that I believe that the plaintiff made arbitrarily The plaintiff is looking for might have set up a claim that was not When the plaintiff sued the defendant bring the case to the three on May 4, 2548 at which time more than 2 years from the date of the Supreme Court of First Instance. Terminate the plaintiff has sued.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 755/2550.
The plaintiff is a legal entity by the Department in the government. There shall be a representative Violation of the Age of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one must begin from the date the Director General of the representative plaintiff knew of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims.
Pm Mr. Chang is a Highway, which is the only official of the Department of plaintiff's only Not directly representative of the plaintiff, even pm Be aware of abuse and know who will should require compensation since 2539, but the Chief represented the plaintiff know the story on September 26, 2546 it held that the plaintiff knew of abuse and know who is should be the claim date. on September 26, 2546 from the date of March 12, 2547, the date has not filed the expiration of 1 year's case does not terminate the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 389/2550.
The plaintiff informed credit union defendants have agreed to the plaintiff from being a member of the defendant from the date of January 11, 2541 show that the plaintiff was aware of it should be compensation in the non-fall at the date of receiving written notice from the defendant. is the day that the plaintiff should be aware of the compensation. Because the plaintiff is injured to bring the case to court itself. No need waiting to hear instructions from the defendant. Although plaintiff may have just received notification of the defendants to know the resolution on January 21, 2541, it had no effect on the age, just starting. When plaintiffs bring the case to sue more than one year from the knowledge of the infringement and the will should be aware of the claims. Then terminate the under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one
Judgement of the Supreme Court 386/2550.
2 The plaintiff sued the defendant as the defendant violated an employer as a defendant in two of the employer violated the employment. And the three defendants jointly liable as a recipient Prauanpaicgmhun indemnity liability of the defendant and the defendant a 2, 3, is different. For the defendants 1 and 2, age of 1 year from the date the victim knew of abuse and know who will should require compensation under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one of the defendant to 3 age of 2 years from the date of casualty, according Article 882, paragraph one at the age of the lawsuit accused the first of two defendants to three can be separated from each other under section 295 given age as you or a penalty only to the debtor who is accused of three can not be lifted prescription Section 448, paragraph one of the battle.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 321/2550.
Claims data in which the offense punishable under the Penal Code. Which the criminal statute of longer under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph two, meaning only the claims of male perpetrators or participants in the offense in particular. Does not mean others are not involved in the offense with Claim 2, which took the defendant to an employer. It requires a prescription under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 448, paragraph one, when the accused 2 to the fight that the reason this case occurred on February 20, 2542, but the plaintiff to sue for damages in case of violation on April 22, 2545 after the birth. Why waste for 3 years then terminate the plaintiff sued. Would express to terminate the cause of that is understandable. Violation from the date of the accident until the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit to terminate the first year and then to the defendant's words are like the two with the Code of Civil Procedure Section 177, paragraph two cases for two defendants, so the issue of prescription
Judgement of the Supreme Court 307/2550.
Actions to be offense to Act offenses arising from the use of check BE 2534, Section 4 shall be issued checks to pay off debt and forced to exist under the law. Which is an element of the offense. Not only details that can attest to the floor. Describe the plaintiff sued the defendant, but only that the check for payment under the contract a copy of liability and liability for the end of action. Thus describe the lack of action component fault Because of the liability does not cause a new debt. Just cause, age, interrupted only down. Plaintiff's complaint is not legitimate. Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 158 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 204/2550.
Because of the state debt, which interrupted the prescription to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) if the debtor must be made to creditors. The plaintiff, a creditor to deduct a credit to the defendant, a debtor is not in accordance with the provisions section such conditions. The first part of the defendant to return plaintiff's part, it is used as the right to party. Not show that the defendant admitted that a plaintiff is a debt unpaid. Not considered an admission that the plaintiff's liability as well. Age does not make a seamless stop.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 101/2550.
Two defendants made compromise agreement with the bank and the court sentenced the give notice that an agreed settlement principal and interest within six months from the date of the compromise agreement clause 2 agreed to pay the court did not order back and attorneys' fees 5,000 within March 9, 2538 and Article 3, if the defendant failed to pay debts or fails to comply with any of the contract shall be deemed in default and allow all to immediate execution. When the defendant did not have to pay obligations under clause 2, within days of March 9, 2538 shall be deemed in default and the bank can force the case immediately under Article 3, so old and have to start from the date of March 10, 2538, not counting the date of 9. August 2538 after six months from the date of the compromise agreement because the defendant fails to pay debt principal and interest as a plaintiff's contracts, the transferee bank claims on the prosecution on May 9, 2548 more than 10 years and then expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 17/2550.
1 to 3, the defendant entered into the guarantee of S. By allowing liability associated with S. The fourth defendant as the husband of the defendant to three to allow the defendant to 3 to guarantee agreement with the defendant guilty and accept the 3 Sat The plaintiff employee was the plaintiff's misappropriation of funds. And a letter to the liability that the plaintiff will pay the first installment on August 5, 2537 as the liability of S. Is liable under an employment agreement which has no law on age, specifically has defined 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 period begins from the date of the accident fraudulent misappropriation on January 14, 2536, but when SatA letter to the liability to the plaintiff for repayment refunded to the plaintiff the first installment of 200,000 baht on August 5, 2537 of the state debt that has to age, interrupted it with the time pass away before it does not count in the age The. According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) and Section 193/15 and age, that stumble into this would have stopped a penalty for the four defendants who are guaranteed by the Civil and Commercial code Section 692 of the state case for products liability under Section 193/35 of 2 years of age, which later appeared on Sat No first payment to the plaintiff on August 5, 2537 as the liability to. Because the prescription is interrupted to terminate on such date. And one begins from the date of August 6, 2537 onwards, the plaintiff filed the case on April 9, 2537 on the date of August 6, 2537, a day after the start of a new age not exceeding 10 years can not terminate the plaintiff's case.
The Supreme Court 9009 - 9014/2549.
The plaintiff sued the six lectures. Dismissal of the plaintiff and the defendant by the plaintiff's six-six, which are not offenders dismissal unfair to force defendants to pay damages for the dismissal unfair not to sue the defendant to pay wages or damages arising from the contract. is not paid or otherwise an age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/34, but that is the case filed a claim for damages arising from unfair dismissal under the Labour Court and Procedure BE 2522, Section 49, which has no law specifically to their age. Has an age limit of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8696/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages to the plaintiff would occupy a taxi. The plaintiff lessor to lack of interest that should be taken from the leased property to rent out the grounds for termination from the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. Despite a 400 baht per day, the same rate as the rent. But it is a legal action against the lack of benefit from the use of a rental property, not to sue unpaid. This case, the Civil and Commercial Code does not specifically prescribe prescription. Has an age limit of ten years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8694/2549.
Enforcement officers announced the property by public auction to the terms of the price and terms that Buyer Sub to pay the rest within 15 days from the date of purchase onwards the 15 days given to buyers of Property to the remaining funds to pay under the contract that is the time set for repayment Non-prescription, as required by law that the parties will agree to abstain or not to extend or shorten according to the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/11 of the property and the buyers enforcement officers agreed extension of time deposit the rest. Another is to find a violation of the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 510 and 515 do not, there is no legal reason that the court may issue an order to revoke the order and auction of enforcement officers. This case. Like the court to order raised by the petition of the defendant need not investigate
The Supreme Court 8242 - 8246/2549.
1 to 3, the plaintiff sued a bonus under an employment agreement which, by the Labour Protection Act BE 2541, Section 5 defined the term "wages" means money that employers and employees agreed to pay as compensation for working under contract for a period of normal operation ... And the word "overtime" means money paid by the employer to an employee in return for working overtime on a weekday. Although overtime is not paid as defined above. It is not money that employers pay to employees in return for normal functioning of the working day. However, it is money that employers pay compensation for work outside normal time. Commitments which the employer must pay to the employee under an employment agreement. Sinhgrong considered by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 575, overtime is based on one Civil and Commercial Code Section 193 / 34 (9), the age of 2 years of litigation.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7875/2549.
The purpose of the plaintiff Housing Supplies business machine business. Furniture, electrical equipment, including spare parts and accessories of such goods. The plaintiff sold the furniture to equipment categories that a defendant has a business purpose or operation of the plaintiff that the defendant is a business hotel. The defendant to a machine shop type of furniture from the plaintiff is to be used in the business of the defendant at a hotel which is the business of the defendant went to an exception under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1) Therefore, the plaintiff take legal action cost products Furniture owed by a defendant, there was an age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7611/2549.
The plaintiff filed a lack of benefit from the use of a rental car after the lease break. The lease does not take legal action. The plaintiff sued in the lack of benefit from the use of car hire age of 10 years of age, 2 years, not as a second petition, so the defendant claims the lack of utilization of a car lease will not terminate the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 6785/2549.
According to the Civil and Commercial Code and Compensation Act, tax on export production in the Kingdom. Age is not provided in the case of claims under this specifically. Plaintiff's claims against two defendants who are 10 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Section. 193/30 plaintiff's claim does not terminate the recovery Windfall should not be.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5996/2549.
Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 states that "the age to start from the time the claim may be forced on. If it claims to abstain to act in any way. To start from the time of the first violation of the act "when listening to the fact that the Central Labour Court that a defendant by the second defendant had agreed verbally with the Plaintiff that If the plaintiff can be detected fraud and corruption proceeds returned to the defendant that a plaintiff may receive special consideration. When it appears that the plaintiff has detected fraud and to cause the defendant to a lawsuit Thai Bank of Commerce Limited (Thailand) and Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited () even on 31 March 2546 the defendant, a recovery of 9,403,007.63 Baht conditions. verbal agreement may force the defendant claims that a special compensation payment from the under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/12 find products from the date of October 15, 2544 which is on the plaintiff resigned from being an employee. of a defendant when the plaintiff is not a regular employee filed a special fee per cent of the work done. Thus demanding compensation for working under an employment agreement with an agreed work done in the normal working hours of the workday, which pay Is the claim that the age of 2 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (9), the plaintiff filed an action in the Central Labour Court on May 6, 2547 is not the expiration of 2 years from the date of March 31. 2546, which date shall be entitled to claim. Does not terminate the plaintiff's case.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5994/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant, the employer, the employee to pay debts arising from the defendant guilty of the employment agreement by the plaintiff to withdraw the product and then do not return the books, the liability to the plaintiff. Is the case, the plaintiff sued the defendant to liability under the employment agreement. Not to sue the defendant liable under the liability book. But the defendant claimed that a letter has been a liability for evidence that the defendant was guilty of an employment agreement with the only Such debt does not have the old law specifically so the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5201/2549.
The defendant hired someone building a building. In this regard, a defendant ordered plaintiff's employment from the plaintiff and zinc roof building If it falls into force of the Civil and Commercial Section 193/34 (a) at the end of that Unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. So the old claims of the plaintiff is a period of 5 years from the time payment is due on the defaulted defendant to a lawsuit until the expiration of 5 years not to sue does not terminate the plaintiff.
The plaintiff handed over the roof to install a defendant after that when it rains the roof leaks and turn off when the wind hit. , Which defects, which should not be found, while on authorized. The plaintiff is a defendant liable under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 598 by the first defendant had paid the Sidhiiึdhnnyong only to the plaintiff to repair the defect. When the plaintiff has not completed repairs to a defendant to withhold it like it was Sinhgrong.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 5033/2549.
Labour Protection Act, BE 2541, Section 125, paragraph one provided that "When the Labor Inspector can issue an order under section 124 if the employer, employee or The Dharma heir of the employee who has died are not satisfied that order to bring the case to court within 30 days from the date of the order," which is to set up. bring the case to court under the provisions of these is scheduled to bring a lawsuit. Age is not the right to claim any right to bring the case to the court in accordance with Act on Establishment of Labour Court and Labour Court Procedure BE 2522, Section 8 (4) is subject to Section 26 of the Act which provided that "Period, as defined in this Act or by the Labour Court has set. Labour Court has the power to shorten or extend as necessary and in the interest of justice ", so the time for filing such cases can shorten or extend as necessary and in the interest of justice.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4998/2549.
The lawsuit asked to revoke acts of mortgage redemption. Mortgage and sale of the land back to the plaintiff is the owner of the property monitoring and regain their property under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1336, there is no set prescription.
The fourth defendant to purchase the land leave the disputed amount to 2,500,000 baht already sees that The only power of attorney signed by the plaintiff which has no authority to make that message and not given anything to fill in the proxy The plaintiff did not agree with. Is caused by gross negligence of the defendant to four naive own fraud of the defendant that a plaintiff is not the result of manipulation or allow a defendant accused of manipulation itself as a representative of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not responsible for the defendant to four under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 821, 822, so the defendant to one has no right to the land of the plaintiff to register sale of the defendant to four acts of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant, 4 do not like and do not bind plaintiff The plaintiff shall be entitled to recoup the tracking of their assets from people who have no right to take it. The plaintiff then sued for the revocation of acts of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant was 4.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4997/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendants both jointly fraud plaintiffs to purchase leave the land of the defendant to a cause plaintiff's trust and lost money to the two defendants to 1,500,000 Baht and a request forcing the two defendants together the money to the plaintiff. U.S. 1,500,000 was deposited the purchase price of the land granted to the plaintiff both to the defendant. Non-violation complaint in the age of one year only. But with the right track out of the plaintiff's property back from two defendants who have no right to rely on the Civil and Commercial Code Section 1336 by which time the property owner does not exercise this The interest of such money damages, which is considered the plaintiff's motion for a civil action relating to the criminal offense of fraud. The plaintiff in the prosecution of criminal cases is not absolute. Does not terminate the according Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 51 paragraph two.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4857/2549.
Car repair contract that the plaintiff, the defendant made a contract of 2 years of age under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1).
The plaintiff delivered the car to anyone who is ready to fix the car then. The plaintiff may enforce their rights in a claim to the defendant to pay Sinhgrong counted from the date of delivery of each vehicle, which led to the expense. The defendant used the money to pay debts for some of the plaintiff. Thus the liability to the plaintiff. Interrupted to make the old and the new age begins from that date. According to the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) and Section 193/15.
Plaintiff's debt to 41 items, the total amount of 402,197 baht, which the plaintiff can enforce their rights before the date of May 8, 2541 filed on 19 June 2543, more than two years ago sued the plaintiff in this section and so terminate. The more debt the repairs to 11 of 47,500 baht appears that on May 8, 2543, the date the defendant to pay some debts. Debt repairs and 11 do not terminate the list. Prescription for such debt must begin recount And when calculated up to no more than two years to sue the plaintiff in 11 cases this is not terminate the.
Of the state debt which will cause the prescription will be interrupted to terminate the action before the debt. When the repairs of debt 402,197 to terminate the U.S. since before the May 8, 2541 partial settlement of the defendant on such date, there is no interruption of the prescription is stopped.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4787/2549.
Plaintiff to travel from Bangkok to Udon Thani on July 25, 2541 at which the defendant should be delivered to the plaintiff lost luggage. Prescription shall begin from that date. Although the plaintiff may bring a lawsuit on August 9, 2542, which set out a year ago, but on November 13, 2541 defendant sent a letter to the plaintiff agrees to compensate it for damages amounting to U.S. $ 400, although not full amount the plaintiff claims. It is a book for state debt. The result was a life interrupted by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 14 (1) When the plaintiff to the lawsuit filed on August 9, 2542 and will not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4786/2549.
The prosecution asked the child is a child the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1556, paragraph three states that achieve the conditions in which children will need to bring a lawsuit within one year from the date of legal age. Appears as a birth certificate and a copy of that registration. The singer was born on May 24, 2512 petitioner filed this lawsuit on October 20, 2546 when the petitioner has 34 years of age, thus applying after the expiration of one year from the date of legal age. Cases of so terminate the petitioner. Although petitioner claimed that the dead will not deny that petitioner was not a child is no dispute about the rights or duties under the law, and when they die, then death. Petitioner to obtain family allowance Council members But officials are not committed to. Claim that there is no evidence that the petitioner is a legitimate child of the deceased. Is a hindrance to the recent dispute the right of the petitioner. Petitioner must be exercised by the Court for an order that the petitioner is the legitimate child of the deceased in accordance with How to Code of Civil Denis Section 55, but any exercise of the court of the petitioner is also required under the provisions of these ages with Petitioner claimed that the petitioner would have just been the right argument. Not terminate the case for no.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 4206/2549.
Act on the Carriage of Goods by Sea BE 2534, Section 46 applies only if the sender or the consignee sued the carrier's liability for damages for the loss. Damage or delay in delivery of the contract of carriage by carriage of goods by sea only.
The plaintiff sued the defendant hired the plaintiff's delivery to the customer of the plaintiff in Saudi Arabia. The defendant represented the plaintiff. The defendant liable because of shipping documents to the end customer agreement delayed The customer acceptance only Plaintiff claimed that the defendant is a marine transportation and the defendant's liability for loss reason. Damage or delay in delivery of goods during the carriage of goods in the custody of the accused under Section 39 of the Act, Carriage of Goods by Sea BE 2534 the provisions of Section 46 shall not apply to. However, because the Act does not prescribe on prescription in this case. Must be provisions on the liability of the agent according to P.Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1,Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1, Be applied, but P.Director, HQ 3, Police Colonel Arun Wachirasri, deputy director of HQ 3, Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1 Narcotics and Crime Suppression Division 1, Civil and Commercial Book 1, Title 6 Chapter 2 that with age, they have not provided their age in this particular case and as such. Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 know when the plaintiff on December 8, 2544 that the defendants guilty Agreement customers can not pick up soon cause damage. Determines that such date is the day that the plaintiff may enforce the right to claim damages from the defendants. And after the date the plaintiff to sue within 10 years and do not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3648/2549.
Tort Liability Act Officer BE 2539, Section 5 is the state agency is liable to victims of abuse in the results of their actions, officials in the performance. The injured party may sue the government directly. But officials would not sue. The case is the plaintiff, a police department to take recourse to sue the two defendants, a police official. Because the two defendants made the duty of the representatives of the plaintiff, a corporate cause damage to others. And the plaintiff is liable to pay compensation for such damages under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 76, paragraph one, the plaintiff has the power to sue And the age of 10 years.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3314/2549.
Although the plaintiff is a trader's call for the delivery of which was 2 years old and under Section 193/34 (a) matter, but at the end of this section, provided the case is an exception that is not in the age of 2. that year unless it is made to the Company's accounts receivable department itself. The need to consider the affairs of the debtor that kind of a business case. The two defendants buying fuel from the plaintiff to the buses. The two defendants operate offshore transport of passengers and cargo. Would hold that the two defendants from the plaintiff to buy fuel in the affairs of the two defendants. Which is to be the case with the exception Not in the age of 2 years by the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (1), but the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 3097/2549.
The defendant requested an open letter of credit to the plaintiff, a commercial bank to purchase goods from suppliers abroad. And give credit to the plaintiff by the defendant, a payment on behalf of the defendant before such a service is a type of commercial bank loans only. Yes, it is the case for the plaintiff to a business or a business administrator of a defendant or the defendant to structures instead of one under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) No it can not be taken. age of 2 years under these provisions shall apply in the case. And the defendant, a letter of credit agreement with the plaintiff but the defendant can not pay a debt to the plaintiff under the contract, letters of credit. Has entered into an agreement with the plaintiff's trust receipts to obtain documents from the plaintiff to pick up the goods before. The plaintiff will pay later. Later, a defendant who has not received goods to pay the plaintiff the defendant owe the plaintiff has a contractual agreement, which trust receipts, which continued to contract, letters of credit. Obligations under the contract for trust receipts are currently no law on age, especially The 10 year old would under Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2983/2549.
The plaintiff sued the defendant liable under a contract for opening letters of credit. This is the case, the plaintiff must bind directly to the supplier, the beneficiary under letters of credit. The plaintiff is not the business of the structures to which a defendant and then call for a Sinhgrong will receive funds, including advances to the plaintiff was released before a defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7). liable to prosecution under the contract for opening letters of credit law does not specifically define the age. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Defendant to a contract for opening letters of credit with the plaintiff but the defendant can not pay a debt to the plaintiff under the contract for opening letters of credit. Has entered into an agreement with the plaintiff's trust receipts to obtain documents from the plaintiff to obtain the product first and then make a payment to the plaintiff after Later, the defendant, not a product to receive payment in full by the plaintiff. Debt under trust receipts are not indebted to the business of governance of others or for the various tasks which call for Wage will receive from it. And advance funds issued by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 34 (7) When the law does not specifically define the age. Therefore the age of 10 years under Section 193/30.
Civil and Commercial Section 193/33 paragraph means that the unpaid interest that would terminate the portion of more than 5 years from the filing date back. The interest owed is not more than five years and expire. The plaintiff has the right to demand interest on arrears from the date of filing back down to no more than 5 years.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2880/2549.
Revenue Code Section 19 provisions to set up a Tax Authority is empowered to issue the summons filed by the investigation and issue a summons to witness To order the submission of evidence that the items or account Documents or proofs to be on the show. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that any person listed in the form of submission of incorrect or incomplete truth. Through the issuance of a summons must be made within two years from the date of the filing of the list. And if that is the case, the Director-General to approve the extension of time to issue a subpoena, it shall not exceed five years from the date of submission of the list. If the expiration of this will affect not only the Tax Authority the power to issue a summons to the subsequent investigation. And issue a summons to testify to order the submission of witness lists or the documents or other evidence to show only Yes, it is for the provision of age to claim the tax not paid. The issuance of a summons to the person who is responsible for the business tax under Section 91/21 (5) subject to the provisions of section 88 shall apply mutatis mutandis. The authority of the Tax Authority is not subject to section 19 by section in the statute of the Civil and Commercial Law Section 193/31 of the state that claims to call for tax to the age of 10 years, official assessment. has the authority to assess taxes from the plaintiff within the period of 10 years from the due date that the plaintiff must file a list of specific business tax. When the time is still in the Age of the assessment officer shall assess the plaintiff only has to pay business tax.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2542/2549.
The plaintiff claims filed by residents raised primarily of charges that Deposited at the defendant to the plaintiff. Later, someone else is a fake signature of the plaintiff's withdrawal from the account of the plaintiff. Committed by the defendant negligently allowed to withdraw. The plaintiff has been damaged. The defendant liable for payment of the plaintiff to be withdrawn with interest. Plaintiff's motion for such a look is deposited into the defendant returned the deposit agreement. Although the plaintiff may sue to describe the negligence of the defendant is to show that Defendant may be liable to the plaintiff for not fulfilling duties to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 659, paragraph three states only. Find the right to sue in the data, which violated the age of 1 year, the defendant did not petition. Claims for refund under the deposit law has no statute of the particular Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 2058/2549.
The plaintiff the defendant made an agreement to buy land title deed No. 15658, and has purchased land dispute, a road adjacent to the land on May 20, 2519 to the date of 19 December 2521 the defendant registered the transfer of land title deed No. 15658. the plaintiff under an agreement to buy and to sell the land payments to the plaintiff some Considered the liability under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) age, would stop tripping. Time does not pass away before the to the prescription, and begins a new life since the age of reason that interrupted to end the Civil and Commercial Section 193/15 agreement to buy and to sell it without prescription by law. therefore only the 10-year old Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 and the new age begins from the date of 20 December 2521 on 27 October 2530 the defendant received a letter that the amount of 50,000 baht from the plaintiff the value of the land. the road as the purchase and sale agreement dated May 20, 2519 the balance will be paid to the date of the transfer agreement. Text in the book indicate that the defendant has been that the debt must be transferred as part of the land to the plaintiff on the other road. It is a book for liability under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/14 (a) the age, interrupted by another one. Time to pass before the count is not added to their age. And begins a new prescription from the date of October 18, 2530 onwards from the date of October 22, 2540 the plaintiff to prosecute this case no more than 10 years, it has not terminate the plaintiff.
Abolishment is not ratified by the parties and stakeholders anyone would raise a waste of abolishment was claimed also by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 172, paragraph one problem that an agreement to buy land disputes is void. or not. It is a problem concerning the public order. Although the defendant does not raise this issue in the Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal. Defendant also has the right to raise this issue in the petition by the class. Civil Procedure Code, Section 249, paragraph two, even disputed land is part of the road in the village where the defendant is the operator of the land and fall into the load. Yield for the benefit of land allocated according to the National Executive Council No. 286, but even the yield load, but the owner Phan network. Property must accept karma, some which affect their property or to refrain from the exercise of certain assets which are in ownership of the property to benefit another Phan and do not own network. Property of any karma that will cause the interest of reducing to servitude or the loss of carrying out the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1387 and 1389 only network Phan property owner also owns the property. The laws do not prohibit the owner Phan network. Property for sale or distribution, sale or transfer in any way. The defendant as owner of the land dispute has the right to sell the disputed land. Agreement to buy land dispute can not be null and void. Defendant disputed land must be transferred to the plaintiff.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 1802/2549.
Insurance trig of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 887 is one of life insurance. Which provided separately in Section 3 of Chapter 2, age of the recipient Insurance trig liability litigation. Must be governed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 882, which provided a general provisions in Part 1 of the same category. Which the prescribed age limit by then. Therefore not comparable to that provided in the case of life insurance and other categories may not be a general under Section 193/30 of age shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case have Prauanpaicgmhun.
Call the recipient to liability claims Insurance trig the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 887, paragraph two states that "the injured party would like to receive the compensation they should have it directly from the insurer ...Etc. "The plaintiff has the right to sue defendants 4 to liability claims by not required to hold the intention to take advantage of the previous contract. The age of litigation under section 882, paragraph one of the states prohibited from prosecution after the expiration of two years from the date of casualty is the law specifically provides that from the date of the casualty. It can not apply the general principles of the age, under Section 193/12 comes into force apply to this case or be interpreted as something else, so when the plaintiff to bring a lawsuit expiration of two years from the date of casualty, the plaintiff in the case of the defendant. 4, then terminate the.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 667/2549.
Although overdraft loan agreement, the Agreement to add overdraft loan, which must also account the nature of the contract will not be scheduled. Account contracts, independent agreement that is unique. The contract will maintain a go on it must be widespread and ongoing accounting within a reasonable time. Facts show that pharmacist. Bringing the money into accounts for less Thon, which circulate in the final account on 14 March 2526 and there is no accounting for current account and stuff from the pharmacist on. Died a long time, almost 12 years show that pharmacist. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default then. The plaintiff is a financial institution is required to monitor the client's account at all times that what is moving. When it appears that the pharmacist. The plaintiff's customers no account activity. The plaintiff would have to call or terminate the contract in a reasonable time. Marks are not the right thinking long-term interest in this unreasonable. Considered that the use of the rights of the plaintiff does not act in good faith. The contract is considered closed in from the pharmacist. With the intent to terminate the contract with plaintiff by default is the date of 14 March 2526 at which pharmacist. Circulate the final accounting. Claims of the plaintiff to recover under overdraft had happened since then. Claims under the age of 10 years is scheduled to bring the case to the plaintiff to sue on February 5, 2539 expiration of 10 years for loans under the agreement terminate the account so. However, it appears that pharmacist. Brought land and built mortgaged as collateral for such debt in the amount of 5,500,000 baht plus interest at a rate of 15 percent per year with an agreement that if the plaintiff shall mortgage money is not enough debt to allow forced out of the property. until the end, even as other obligations under the contract will terminate the account. However, if required by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 745 and Section 193/27 is the plaintiff, the mortgagee will require repayment of the mortgage assets, even when the mortgage debt that is insured, then terminate the time. But are forced to pay the interest owed over the past five years can not And constant force, but only property pharmacist.Mortgage only. Will be required from other property not more than five. Even though the mortgage agreement is determined to force out of other assets until the end. If force is not enough money to pay the mortgage debt even.
(Meeting No. 3 / 2548).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 142/2549.
Claims incurred by the compromise agreement with the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/32, whether claims are the same age, how much the second defendant, a breach of contract and the compromise on October 10. 2539 plaintiff filed this lawsuit on September 29, 2542 to no more than 10 years and do not expire.
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8712/2548.
The provisions of Section 193/33 and 193/34 section of the Civil and Commercial Code. Despite the age, demanding the same salary, but Section 193 / 34 (9) If an employee is called out of money by working under an employment agreement from your employer. Employer or employers run out of money due from the employee to return from the Section 193/33 (4) is not the case that the other employees call for salary payment types. From those who have the responsibility to pay. Which is scheduled to pay in time. The plaintiff sued the employee, the employer called the defendant to pay the salary and accommodation rights under the employment agreement, which is 2 years old and under Section 193/34 (9), not 5 years under Section 193/33 (4).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 8007/2548.
Debt arising from the debtor, a corporate business purpose the hotel kitchen equipment with the installation of creditors. Perpetrated for profit in the business of the debtor to continue. Therefore the age of 5 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193 / 33 (5) of section 193 / 34 (1).
Judgement of the Supreme Court 7656/2548.
1 defendant received a letter of liability to the plaintiff on May 13, 2540 by the plaintiff that a debt loan is 60,000 baht as evidence of the effect of loans in writing and in writing with the state debt. The loans are no legal age limit of particular Therefore the age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of the book debts without the condition, age, in itself, but with age, resulting in debt to the original interrupted. When the date of May 13, 2540 until October 24, 2544, the date the plaintiff to prosecute within 10 years can not terminate the.
The liability of the debtor if debtor is not the fault condition after the debt is old enough to terminate the life of two years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/35.
