Section 9 When any business is
lawfully enforced in writing. The person who has to do the book does not have
to write it himself. The book must be signed by the person.
Fingerprints, seals, stamps or
other marks, like that, made in the document instead of the signature. If there
are two witnesses, the signature is always signed.
The provisions of paragraph
two shall not apply to fingerprints, seals, seals or other marks. This is done
in the documents made before the competent official.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
9683 - 9685/2558.
Dispute is a simple testament. Or
witness testimony A letter with the date of the year, while the testament,
eraser, fill in the channel, the date and age of the deceased, the signature of
the deceased and the signature of the professor with the signature of the
witness. The dead are under the influence of the two. The deceased person has
signed the fingerprint on the testator. The signature of Prof. and W. at the
full test. The testament to the dispute is not clear statement of death. There
is a message saying "testament" at the center of the paper. This
means that a document of intent to make a death in any property or work is
legally enforceable when the deceased person dies. And it is stated. "....
I ask my daughter to be a trustee to follow my intentions to share the
property. The will to divide the property as follows ... "The case is
meaningful in that the requirements in the document will affect when the
deceased died. The will of the dispute is in accordance with the provisions of
Section 1656 of the Civil and Commercial Code and the law. It is not void.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
8687 - 8688/2558.
When the defendant died The court
order setting the defendant to the trustee has no effect. But the inheritance
of the inheritance is not inherited by the inheritors of the heirs. The court
allowed the couple to be replaced by the defendant.
The will has two witnesses, and
there is no law forbidding testimony to testify as fingerprints. When it is not
revealed that the testimony of the two are prohibited by the Civil and
Commercial Code, Section 1670. The testament to the signature and fingerprints
in front of the DHS when the two sign the certificate at the moment. Will
testify in accordance with Section 1665. Will be valid according to the form
and complete by the law.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
290/2558.
The signing and signing of the
witness in the guarantee agreement to certify fingerprints of the MPs, although
not specified. As a fingerprint testimonial, it is a fingerprint certification.
The fingerprint of the MP is subject to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section
9, paragraph two, and the plaintiff charged interest on the loan at the default
interest rate of 19% per annum, it is considered a penalty. If it is too high,
the court will reduce the penalty. But due to the transfer of the plaintiff's
debt under this case. Asset Management Company, 1998, the right to charge
interest must be in accordance with the rules prescribed by the Bank of
Thailand. Asset Management Company, 1998, Section 10, paragraph one.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
7929/2557.
When considering the testimony of
R. 3, it appears that there is a left thumb and thumb print, and Mr. A. and the
police sergeant G. bear the fingerprints of the dead. According to the
testament to the message. The dead man prints the left forefinger in front of
witnesses. I see that. The fingerprints of the deceased are fingerprints beyond
what is specified in the will. But do not make any will to lose. The will is
also fruitful.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
6746/2555.
The contract between the
defendant and the defendant is a deposit. The property is deposited. There is
no provision in the law that there must be evidence in the signature of the
party liable. Make a written or registered letter. The parties agree to the
terms and conditions of the contract. How will the changes be resolved? So,
with the defendant, the first defendant can agree to change the withdrawal
agreement to withdraw money by typing the left thumbprint instead of the
signature. The agreement is not a typewritten fingerprint under Section 9
paragraph two, even if no fingerprint certification authority is enforceable
between the parties. Because it is a method and agreement that the depositor
will order the depositor to return the property deposited under the Civil and
Commercial Code, Section 665 first paragraph.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
15964/2553.
The circumstances of the landlord
have fingerprints in the power of attorney without any text. Make sure that you
want to sell the land. He also handed over the land title deed. The contact
person will buy the land to do that, giving the opportunity for the lender and
the delegate to use in other businesses by filling out the message that. Land
to register the mortgage instead of the defendant. Hold the defendant seriously
negligently. The defendant will take the consequences of his gross negligence
to fight the plaintiff. A person who is outside the mortgagee in good faith so
that he or she can not be held liable.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
6542/2552.
A photocopy of the power of
attorney at the back of the 5 Correctional Officer is certified as a left
thumbprint of the plaintiff. Printed on the actual power of attorney The
intention is to make the land transfer by signature as evidence. On the same
day, another power of attorney was issued. It is also authorized to register
the transfer of inheritance and the building as well as the power of attorney
to the words. To the land plaintiff to replace the plaintiff. The plaintiff's
fingerprints with two witnesses are complete. Always bear with the signature of
the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 9, paragraph two and under Section 822,
the plaintiff claimed that the fingerprint in the power of attorney without
filling out. Both copies of the house registration and a copy of the
identification card to the defendant to show the negligence of the plaintiff.
When the defendant entered the power of attorney in addition to the purpose of
the plaintiff and brought to the third defendant is the defendant, the second
defendant believes that the plaintiff actually. The plaintiff will raise their
negligence as an excuse to revoke the transfer of land transferred to the
defendant in good faith. Except for the plaintiff, the defendant will show the
dishonesty of the defendant.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
4145/2548.
Even fingerprints in the
plaintiff's power of attorney. It's just a smudge of ink, not a fingerprint
pattern. But under the print It has a description in brackets. The fingerprint
of the person. It can be understood that the fingerprint is a fingerprint. Not
smudge ink When the plaintiff has two witnesses, and the plaintiff witnessed
the testimony that the printed pattern is the thumbprint of the plaintiff's
right hand, because the details. The signature of the plaintiff's power of
attorney is legally.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
4422/2545.
The plaintiff stated in the complaint.
The plaintiff's power to file a lawsuit. And the name of the couple "Mrs.
Dee Panichcharoen" by the plaintiff's attorney, but listed in the lawyer's
statement filed with the lawsuit. The plaintiff is the author of a lawyer in
his own and the signature of the plaintiff in the prosecution. The plaintiff
sued the lawsuit itself, but did not authorize the lawsuit. There are no issues
to diagnose. The plaintiff authorized the plaintiff to file this case.
Lawyer of the plaintiff has
the signature of one finger not always with the signature of the Civil and
Commercial Code, Section 9, paragraph two, resulting in the appointment of a
plaintiff's attorney is not incomplete. The lawyer has no authority to sign the
plaintiff at the end of the indictment. As the indictment does not sign the
plaintiff, the Court of First Instance has the power to order the new or
amended by the Civil Procedure Code, Section 18, paragraph two, and this
amendment may be done in many ways, such as the plaintiff to sign the plaintiff
at the end of the indictment. Or in the field of lawyers. The lawyer or the
authority to make a representation of the plaintiff in the fingerprints of the
plaintiff in the certificate of attorney to sign. When it appears that the
plaintiff was dead, and there is a plaintiff's replacement. Such person shall
have the power to proceed to the plaintiff's consideration. As well as the
power to correct the defects of the lawyer to replace the plaintiff.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
4001/2545.
The testament is to use Garuda
branded paper and the text is typewritten. Handwriting only the house number,
date, month, year of the two inheritances. And a list of testamentary The
signature and fingerprints of the two inheritance. When it appears that the
testament has made a letter dated the month while doing. The testator signs and
fingerprints in front of two witnesses simultaneously. And the witness signed
the complete signature of the testimony in accordance with the provisions of
Section 1656.
The testamentary does not specify the
descendant who was cut off to inherit. But when the inheritance legacy sold all
legacy. The heir apparent who is not benefited from the will is cut off to
inherit.
The spouse of the inheritor of
the will testify on behalf of the testimony of the inheritance will not be able
to inherit the will. There is no law in the testament to the M, but there is no
law prohibiting the court to listen to the testimony of T. and A. are any
witnesses. The will of the petitioner remains in full force.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
1754/2543.
The plaintiff sued the trustee as a
defendant. The lawsuit filed against the 1st, 2nd, 5th and 6th defendants,
heirs of the estate and the third defendant, who is not a heir. To get rid of
inheritors do not inherit because of conceal the inheritance. And to revoke the
legal transfer of inherited land is wrong to transfer the land back to the
original inheritance. If not with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1733,
paragraph two, can not apply the age of 5 years to apply to the case.
In the registration of
transfer of land dispute between the defendant and the defendant, the third
defendant signed the fingerprint of the MP to fingerprints is the same as the
signature and the third defendant transferred land title deeds. The purchase of
a long time ago, not a transfer of land as a descendant of the inheritance of
the estate, which is the husband of the defendant when the third defendant
transferred land by the value. Represent and act in good faith in accordance
with Section 1300, the plaintiff called for the revocation of registration of
transfer of land between. The three defendants are not.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
7156/2541.
According to the Civil and Commercial
Code, Section 9, paragraph two explicitly provided. Two fingerprints are
required to be fingerprint proof. Only one fingerprint of the defendant's
fingerprint is present. The plaintiff signed the loan only in the lender. Not
signed in the fingerprint testimonial field, although the plaintiff is the
author of the message under the loan agreement. Specifically, it is written as
"fingerprints." But the plaintiff does not sign a fingerprint
testimony of the defendant as follows: The plaintiff can not sign the witness
fingerprints of the defendant's testimony. The fingerprint of the defendant is
not up to 2 people, the loan agreement will always be with the defendant's
signature is not. The plaintiff sued the defendant did not. Prohibited under
the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 653
Judgment of the Supreme Court
5418/2540.
Power of Attorney indicates that
the plaintiffs 2 to plaintiff 4, the plaintiff sued the plaintiff to prosecute
the 1st plaintiff and plaintiff 4, signed in the plenipotentiary does not
indicate that as a witness, the third plaintiff fingerprinted at the channel.
The left side of the second plaintiff's signature as follows: When the power of
attorney is only registered as a single witness. It may be considered that the
signature of the plaintiffs 2 and 4 into the box of the attorney has certified
fingerprints of the third plaintiff with the fingerprint of the third plaintiff
has witnessed less than two people, the plaintiff. No. 3 was not signed as a
complete power of attorney under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 9,
paragraph three, the plaintiff has no power to prosecute the third plaintiff.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
40/2539.
The defendant is not a witness in
the testament that the defendant signed a fingerprint testament to the
testamentary does not have a witness testify to the testament to the testament
to no land to the defendant void.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
6290/2538.
The testament is that the testator will
raise the property at the time of the testament and in advance to the
proprietor or the right to the sole objection, and the testator prints the
fingerprint in front of all three witnesses. The signature of the witness does
not indicate the fingerprint of the testator. I certify the fingerprints of the
testamentary, and will be completed in accordance with the Civil and Commercial
Code, Section 1656.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
955/2507
The person who signs the fingerprint
of the borrower must be a witness to the fingerprints. If the witness will sign
it later, only if the borrower sees and agrees with it. Therefore, in the loan
agreement, the witness did not sign the fingerprint while the fingerprint and
the borrower did not know. Therefore, the lender has no evidence of borrowing
in the letter of the borrower. The lawsuit is not enforceable.
(Big meeting 10/2507)
Judgment of the Supreme Court
1783/2505.
Common testicles have 4 witnesses
signature on the end of the fingerprints of the inheritance. It appears that
prior to the witness's signature, there is a statement that the testator has
signed or fingerprinted in front of me. There is no need for a fingerprint
testimony.
Is the mind of the testator
good? It is a fact to consider when there is a dispute. The law does not
mandate that the testament must be labeled a testimony of the testator.
As usual, fingerprints should
have a fingerprint. But the fingerprints of the inheritance of the testament,
even without fingerprints, because of leprosy. However, when the witness
certifies it is correct. And the fact is that the inheritance has actually
printed fingerprints. Fingerprints are usable
Judgment of the Supreme Court
1080/2505.
The testamentary (typhoon)
fingerprints over the fingerprints that are not clear again. Even fingerprints
can be blurry. It does not become a curry. And do this as a scrape, erase, add,
modify, change, testament.
