Section 28. If the spouse is
good Parents are parents, grandparents, great grandparents, grandparents,
grandchildren, grandchildren, guardians or guardians. The person who governs
that person. Or a prosecutor. Requesting the court to order that person to be
an incompetent person. The court will order the person absent to be an incompetent
person.
The person ordered by the
court to be an incompetent under paragraph one. Must be in kindergarten.
Appointment of preschooler Authority of the Kindergarten And the end of
kindergarten This is in accordance with the provisions of Part 5 of this Code.
The order of the court under
this section. To publish in the Government Gazette.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
2116/2558.
The plaintiff sued the two defendants
as a kindergarten teacher. Although the plaintiff's request for the plaintiff's
petition is to force the defendants to pay damages and open the entrance. It
may seem that the defendants are liable for their personal lives, as the Court
of First Instance understands it is a matter of law enforcement. The plaintiff
sued the two defendants as the kindergarten of the defendant became indicted as
two private. When the defendant 2 to fight the case and the plaintiff as a
defendant, the second defendant and the subject matter of the counterclaim is
the same lease agreement that the plaintiff used as a justification for the
defendant's two defendants. Part 2 claims that the lease is unlawful and based
on that claim as the principal of the counterclaim, the plaintiff to go out of
the room and called the dispute. Damage The defendant's second defendant is
about the original indictment of the Civil Code Section 177 paragraph three.
Section 1598/18, paragraph
two, and Section 1590, which is in force while the Phuket Provincial Court, the
Department of Juvenile and Family Affairs has two defendants who are not
parents or spouse of the Department of Nursing. Who is the incompetent The
provisions on the rights and duties of parents apply to the kindergarten. The
court will set up several kindergartens to act jointly or assign specific
powers to any one, according to the order of the Phuket Provincial Court,
Department of Juvenile and Family Lawsuit in Red Case No. 25/2548, stated that
the two defendants are kindergartens. Of the inability It does not define the
duties of each kindergarten teacher. And how did the kindergarten teacher work
together? The case must be considered that the two defendants acting on behalf
of the monarchy must act with consent. The second defendant, as the only
kindergarten without a defendant, joined and filed a counterclaim, so it is
against the court order. I do not like the provisions of the law, even after
the death of the case in the Court of First Instance. As a result, the
kindergarten of the two defendants against the Fail, which is incompetent,
ended later under Section 1572 (former), 1581 (original). New Amendment Section
1598/6 And 1598/18, and the court ordered the second defendant to be the Legislature
of the eighth to have the legal authority and the second defendant filed a
petition for the replacement of the estate until the Court of First Instance
has a permit. It resulted in the request to become a replacement of the second
defendant due to the filing and counterclaim of the second defendant without
legal power. Back to the law is not new. This problem is a legal issue of
public order. There is no party to any petition. The Supreme Court has the
power to lift up the diagnosis of the Civil Code Section 142 (5)
Judgment of the Supreme Court
10507/2056.
When the suicides died
Kindergarten of the incompetent will end with the Civil and Commercial Code,
Section 28, paragraph two, and Section 1598/18, paragraph two, and Section 1598/11,
the preschooler must immediately deliver the property to the heirs of the
Senator and bookkeeping. Asset management delivered within six months, and if
there is a document on property management, then deliver it along with the
account. If the preschooler or the heir requests the court, the court may order
the extension of time, in accordance with Section 1598/18, paragraph two, and
Section 1598/11. Upon death of the estate, the property of all types, including
rights, duties and responsibilities. Except as provided by law or by condition,
the individual of the deceased will inherit the heirs under section 1599,
paragraph one and section 1600. If, during the performance of the duties of the
nursery, the damage to the s. The inheritance of the Seventh Fall, ie the heir
to claim to the preschooler when the death of MPs, it is not useful to consider
whether to withdraw. The odds that 2 out of a preschool or not. The Court of
Appeal would like to distribute the case under the Civil and Commercial Code,
Section 132 of the Juvenile and Family Court Act and Judicial Procedure for
juveniles and their children in 2010 Section 6 this case is considered to be
the original court order revocation. I agree that the second objection is
wrong.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
2159/2556.
Defendant 1 Employee of the
defendant jointly drive a six-wheel truck with the negligence of a motorbike
crash to cause a disability throughout life. Unconsciousness and memory are not
able to help themselves, so they are incapable of suing themselves. To be in
kindergarten and the kindergarten prosecuted by the Civil and Commercial Code,
Section 56, paragraph one, and even if the plaintiff knows that the defendant
jointly owned a six-wheel truck accident and is the employer of the defendant
or not, but the plaintiff. Can not prosecute until the court ordered the
plaintiff to be the kindergarten of the first case in this case, the age must
be counted in accordance with Section 193/20 of the Civil Code. the The claim
of insanity, the court may order the person is incompetent. If it is due within
one year from the date the person does not have a child. Age is not due until
one year since the date of the child's birth. However, if the claim is less
than one year, the shorter term will be used instead of one year. In this case,
the plaintiff sued the defendant, the first and the defendant jointly in
private. The plaintiff sued as a kindergarten teacher for a period of time
since the plaintiff was a preschool of the Court of First Instance on August
21, 2001, to the age of one year on August 21, 2002, the plaintiff filed a
petition. The b. The partnership became a defendant on March 29, 2002. It is
not yet one year since the plaintiff was appointed as the case. Plaintiff's
plaintiff's case for the defendant is not long term. glistening
Judgment of the Supreme Court
5286/2551.
Condominium Act Section 38 states
that "the following persons are entitled to be appointed as directors: (1)
co-owner or co-owner of the co-owner; (2) Kindergarten or guardian In case
co-owner is a minor (3) the manager or other representative of the juristic
person in the case where the juristic person is the co-owner. "When
considering such provisions, it is evident that the persons who are entitled to
be appointed as juristic (1) and (2) give the right of individual in (3) to
show that the co-owner in the condominium has Appointed as director It is
limited to individuals, so the expression of a legal entity is done through a
representative or agent. Or the attorney of the juristic person. Section 38 (3)
defines a person to be a director in the case where the juristic person is a
joint owner. "Manager or other representative of a juristic person",
however, when the said Condominium Act in force in the event of a dispute. The
definition of "manager" or "other representative of a juristic
person" does not define or define the meaning of the word
"manager" or "other representative of a juristic person".
Refers to the person who handles the matter to the company. The law does not
require a director to be the manager. May be any person that the company deems
appropriate to appoint a manager. In the case of other representatives of legal
entities, there is a law that requires the person to act. The manager or other
representative of the juristic person is not required to be the Managing
Director of such juristic person. Or directly representative of the entity. The
person authorized or assigned by the joint-venture juristic person shall be
entitled to be appointed as a director to control the management of condominium
juristic persons when the Company, the Company, the Company, the Company, and
the Company. It is a legal entity that owns a condominium. The right to be
elected as a director of a condominium juristic person and authorized to assign
any person to be the manager or representative of the company to be the
director to control the management of the condominium company instead of the
company.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
516/2551.
The lawsuit in this case belongs
to the plaintiff, which is caused by the violation of the employee in the
employ or agent of the defendant. However, because the plaintiff was seriously
injured, physically disabled and brain injury was not able to help themselves
until the prosecution date. The plaintiff sued the case on behalf of the
plaintiff, which appeared on the complaint. Before this lawsuit filed a
petition to the Central Youth Court asked the court to order that the plaintiff
is a quasi-incompetent and set up a guardian. But the Central Juvenile Court
has not yet ordered. And later, after the plaintiff sued the case, the Central
Juvenile Court has ordered that. Symptoms of the plaintiff is not
quasi-incompetent. But the person is insane, according to Civil and Commercial
Code, Section 28 is that. The plaintiff is an incompetent and in the nursery of
the fact. The plaintiff is a person who has been insane since the filing of the
petition. Therefore, while the plaintiff sued the case is a person who is
considered a person incompetent. According to the Civil Code Section 56. The
plaintiff will be presented with the court must comply with the provisions. The
law requires a kindergarten teacher. But the lawsuit is not a plaintiff, the
plaintiff is not the plaintiff, the plaintiff is not entitled to replace the
plaintiff. The only defect in the ability. No power to sue Later, the Central
Youth Court ordered that the plaintiff be the plaintiff, the plaintiff has the
power to act on behalf of the plaintiff in the prosecution of the plaintiff.
The defect in the ability to correct this is complete under Section 56, when
the request is submitted to the court and the court ordered that the child is a
kindergarten to power the plaintiff. The defect in talent is gone. The
plaintiff sued the plaintiff's defect completely, but with complete correction.
Section 29 Any person ordered
by the court to be an incompetent person That is void.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
3552/2550.
The estate was ordered by the
court to be an incompetent from September 20, 1989. Later, the Court of Appeal
sentenced the former Court of First Instance to revoke the order that the
inheritance was an incompetent, but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the
petition. As a result, Mon. still remains incompetent. Even during the case has
not reached the Court of First Instance has ordered that the e. Is a
quasi-incompetent. The order that the e. Quasi-quasi-incompetent, it can not
change. Withdrawal or nullification of the original court order that the court
ordered the applicant to be an incompetent person. Neither the status of an
incompetent person under the court order has fallen, nor has it stopped
temporarily while the case has not been finalized. The consent of the guardian
has made the will of the city council on March 30, 1992. During the time that
the testamentary is subject to the testament, it is void under the Civil and
Commercial Code, Section 1704.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
3184/2550.
The plaintiff sued the defendant
for the violation of the plaintiff by the father of the plaintiff sued and
prosecuted as a representative. But the fact is that the plaintiff is a suitor
then suing. The plaintiff is not a minor under the parental authority of the
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1566, paragraph one, the plaintiff can do
anything without the consent of the prosecutor under Section 2166 But when the
plaintiff sued the disabled, speechless and can not walk. The plaintiff's
father prefers to file a petition to the plaintiff, asking the plaintiff to be
an incompetent or quasi-incompetent person and set up a preschooler or
guardian, as the case may be. As long as there is no court order, the plaintiff
is incompetent or incompetent, it must be considered that the plaintiff is a person
capable of doing any lawful self. Including the lawsuit and prosecution to the
plaintiff's father to sign the plaintiff's lawyer to file a lawsuit instead of
the plaintiff. There is no court order to be the kindergarten or protector of
the plaintiff. As a defect in the ability to comply with the provisions of
Section 56 of the Civil Code, the case must be resolved before.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
3103/2549.
Plaintiff sued the criminal case
to punish the defendant for the invasion. Even though the plaintiff appears to
be a bankrupt person who has been ordered by the court to order the custody of
the defendant, the Bankruptcy Act BE 2483 (2283), Section 22 (3), requires that
the plaintiff be liable to prosecution or fight. Any lawsuit against the
debtor's property is only a matter of lawsuit or civil action against the
property of the debtor. It does not include lawsuits or criminal cases. And the
debtor has been ordered by the court to protect and judge the bankruptcy, so it
is impossible for them to become incompetent to have a legal person or a
kindergarten administrator to replace the provisions of Section 5 (1). Section
4, 5 and 6 of Section 4 of the Act does not contain any provisions that the
Official Receiver shall have the power to handle the debtor who is the injured
person in a criminal case court ordered. Thus, agents with the plaintiff sued
the authority.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
1340/2534.
The plaintiff claims that the
plaintiff is the illegitimate son of his father. Incompetent If true, it is the
same as the children who are lawful under the Civil and Commercial Code,
Section 1627 as follows: the plaintiff has the power to file a petition to the
court to order. An insane person is an incompetent person under the Civil and
Commercial Code, Section 29. And by the same token, even the defendant is the
preserver of the Court of First Instance already. If there are reasonable
grounds. The plaintiff, who is a stakeholder, has the right to request the
court to revoke the defendant as a kindergarten and the plaintiff is a
kindergarten.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
5827/2530.
Defendant is a child shall have the power
to request the court to order the mother is a quasi-incompetent or an
incompetent under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 34 or 29 without the
consent of the plaintiff, the father, the defendant and the mother's mother,
the defendant. Appointing a defendant as guardian or maternity caregiver under
Section 1463, even though the spouse is usually the guardian or the descendant.
Legal or
When the court has ordered the
defendant to be the protector or the mother of the nursery. The defendant has
the power to do any kind of kindergarten. But the case is a claim that the
defendant plaintiff damaged only. Plaintiffs prefer to use the defendant's
lawsuit. There is no reason to revoke the order of the defendant as guardian
and the kindergarten and the plaintiff instead.
Section 30 Any person who is
insane, which the court has not yet ordered an adjudicator to do. It will be a
void when it is done while the person is still alive. And the other party has
already known that the person is insane.
Judgment of the Supreme Court
2319/2542.
It does not appear that the
plaintiff has a clear brain disease as a parsimonious lack of memory. And
irresponsible Because the plaintiff still helps themselves in the daily
routine. Have a fair decision. Mindfulness at the general level. And can talk.
It also appears that the plaintiff made a lawful sale of land and the disputed
house after the plaintiff to work normally for about a month, which the
plaintiff stated that the work to be able to get a day at the office without
sick leave or absence. It clearly shows that. The plaintiff has a sense of
responsibility and responsibility, such as a person with general consciousness.
The plaintiff's illness is not a person of insanity, as provided in Section 30
of the Civil and Commercial Code. The registration of the sale of land and the
dispute between the plaintiff and the two defendants do not fall under the 30 m
as such, so the act of selling land and houses disputed. The plaintiff has no
right to declare the said act to revoke the legal act and have no right to sue
for the revocation of the law of land sales with disputed house.
Section 31. If the cause of
being an incompetent person has expired. And when that individual or any of the
persons referred to in Section 28 request to the court, the court shall order
the revocation of the order to be an incompetent.
The order of the court under
this section. To publish in the Government Gazette.
