Divorce ~ Thai Civil and Commercial Code

Section 1514. The divorce shall be effected by the consent of either party or by a judgment of the court.

Divorce by consent must be in writing and at least two witnesses must sign.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1899/2559.

Court of First Instance to the plaintiff and the defendant to divorce the defendant to a second defendant to pay 100,000 baht plus interest to the plaintiff. And the two defendants together to pay the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants cost 5,000 baht, the defendant paid a court fee of 200 baht, the defendant found that the divorce case is not a lawsuit without paying the fee, which the court ordered the second defendant to pay the court fee of 2,000 baht and the defendant. 2 see that the liability in the plaintiff's fee is only half of the plaintiff, so the deposit is only 3,260 baht, which is incorrect. The Appeal Court granted the appeal without the defendant, the first and second, to pay the court to pay additional court fees. Section 229 of the Civil Code Section 229, the appellant must pay the fee, which must be used by the other party to the court. With the appeal, but the defendants 1 and 2 misunderstood that they are in compliance with the law. It is not intended to violate the law. The opportunity to defend the first and second defendants to pay the fee, which must be used by the other party to the court to be completely accurate. The plaintiff filed for divorce with the defendant and asked the defendant to pay compensation for the defendant in the first case under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, the second defendant, the defendant did not admit that the second. The second defendant rape the defendant, the plaintiff and the defendant that the two plan to destroy the reputation of the defendant during the Supreme Court 2. The plaintiff and the defendant made a compromise agreement that the plaintiff understand that the defendant is a good one that the defendant has no behavior in the affair with the second defendant and not an evil deed and will be living together husband and wife. I do not want to divorce. Compromise Agreement Legally enforceable And do not be against the image of the defendant's case. 2, the issue of divorce, so the judge is in accordance with the compromise agreement. And should be raised to the problem that the defendant is required to pay compensation under Section 1523, paragraph two to the plaintiff or not. The action in the affair must have two parties. When the woman is a defendant, there is no conduct in the affair with the defendant, then it appears that the defendant is not the second defendant in the affair with the defendant, the first defendant is not liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 302/2559.

Even the plaintiff and the defendant husband must live together, I husband and wife under Section 1461 paragraph one, which must be engaged in some. But incest is required by both parties. If the other party does not consent, it can not be enforced. If the defendant is guilty under the Penal Code Section 276, the defendant called a minor child to hear the word until the plaintiff allowed the defendant to commit adultery to the child to rest. As such, the plaintiff will not allow the defendant to commit prostitution. And the plaintiff's cervix inflammation from the incest of the defendant. Defendant did not stop prostitution with the plaintiff. The plaintiff must run away from home. The behavior of the defendant is a serious assault or torture of the heart of the plaintiff. The divorce under Section 1516 (3), and also constitutes an adversarial act against the wife of a serious wife under Section 1516 (6).

Judgment of the Supreme Court 14884/2558.

The petitioner and the defendant divorced by the consent of both parties. Section 1532 (a) provides for the division of the husband's property, as is available at the time of registration of divorce. Agreement on a copy of the record behind the divorce records between the petitioner and the defendant, the 1st defendant agrees to lift the land title deed No. 32498 with the building number 6/82 to the ownership of the petitioner. The contract of division of property between husband and wife according to the provisions of the said section. Not a contract for property that must be made in writing and registered with the competent official to complete the provisions of Section 525 when the registrar divorced. Both parties have already managed to divide the property. The land and buildings are the sole ones. The defendant has not yet registered the transfer of land and their own building to the petitioner. The only result is that the acquisition of the property of the petitioner is not complete under Section 1299 paragraph one, but the rights of the petitioner under the division of property registered by the registrar, and the petitioner has possession. The only one forever. Both mortgage and mortgage redemption from the bank A. It is considered that the petitioner is in a position to register their rights before the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1300 petitioner is not a real estate. By way of other than the law and the plaintiff is the only creditor under the judgment of the defendant, which brought the land and buildings to be sold to the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not a transferee of land and buildings with compensation and in good faith. And have registered in good faith. The plaintiff is not a third party protected under Section 1300 so even if the petitioner does not register the acquisition of land and buildings. Section 1 of the defendant to the competent officer raised the plaintiff's fight. The plaintiff as a creditor under the verdict will affect the rights of the petitioner under Section 277 of the Civil Code, the plaintiff therefore has no right to seize land and buildings to pay debts under the judgment. The petitioner has the right to demand release of the seized property.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 13552/2558.

The parties to the dispute may exercise their right to intervene. The dispute can be settled under Section 850 under the compromise agreement. As a result, the old debt was suspended under Section 852, then bound together as agreed in the compromise agreement. However, the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant in Article 1 states that "the divorce and the surname will be agreed later." Then agreed that the defendant will pay the plaintiff a monthly 20,000 baht. The dispute between the plaintiff and the two defendants caused the defendant to have a relationship with the defendant to the two children and the two defendants eat together. To honor other women I have a wife who has the right to file a divorce under Section 1516 and divorce, the plaintiff has the right to claim compensation from the defendant. Section 1526. In addition, the two defendants have a relationship I am an affair. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation under Section 1523 disputes that give rise to the plaintiff's three rights have not been agreed to suspend each other in any way. The agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant is not a compromise agreement. And according to the circumstances that it is agreed that the divorce and the death of the subsequent show that the plaintiff does not forgive the defendant will cause the right to file a divorce, the plaintiff sued the case. According to the right to the plaintiff, so the defendant can not claim the record. It is a fight.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4230/2558.

The plaintiff and the defendant are Islamic saris. Domiciled in Narathiwat Married in accordance with Islamic law and marriage law under the Civil and Commercial Code. The plaintiff filed for divorce, the defendant described the grounds of divorce under the Civil and Commercial Code. The condition of the charge is a family affair. It is under the force. The law on the use of Islamic law in Pattani, Narathiwat, Yala and Satun, Section 2489, Section 3 of the Islamic Law on Family and Legacy enforce the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code. The reason for the divorce in accordance with Islamic law to enforce the use of Section 1516 when the plaintiff was sentenced to divorce from the wife of the defendant by the Islamic Committee of Narathiwat. It is stated in the letter that the divorce. This decision is a decree of religion and all rules. It is divorced by Islamic law. The same applies to divorce under the Civil and Commercial Code. And can be used to divorce registration under the Civil and Commercial Code. The plaintiff does not need to bring the case to court. Court of First Instance dismissed the plaintiff sued.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6337/2056.

By agreement in document # 1 or # 2, both sides expressed the intention. To divorce the law The registration of divorce. Section 1514, 1515 and 1532 that the law. The divorce will be done by the consent of both parties. Divorce by consent must be in writing and at least two witnesses must sign. When married ... Divorce by consent is complete only when the husband has registered the divorce. And when they divorce, then divide the property of the wife ... as is available at the time of registration of divorce. It is evident that when a married woman is legally married. The property relations of both parties are not exclusive and separate. They also have the same rights, duties and responsibilities as husbands and wives, and to third parties whose law is to be protected. As seen in the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code. This is the reason why when I agreed to terminate the relationship I husband. The law requires the husband to make a written agreement. There must be at least two witnesses to sign. It must also register the divorce with the competent official. This is because the law does not only require certainty in expressing the intention of divorce between husband and wife. But to be aware and refer to outsiders as well. By the provisions of the law. Therefore, the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant in the division of the property as stated is not effective between the same as long as the divorce was not registered. And the defendant will pay the check to the plaintiff after the agreement. This check is just an instrument instead of a pre-paid asset. Prior to the divorce, the consent is legally enforceable. To divide the property as it is at the time of the divorce registration. But when the plaintiff and the defendant has not registered a divorce. The debt can not be enforced because it is not possible to know at what time it is time to register a divorce. The defendant is not liable for the check.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 15984/2553.

Before the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to divorce and the parties will withdraw the lawsuit and withdraw each other. The Court of First Instance registered the agreement in the Report of the Procedure. The plaintiff and the defendant has withdrawn the suit and then the agreement. But later the plaintiff was not registered to divorce. This is the case. The plaintiff sued this case is not sued by the wrong. There are new and different issues with the original case. The problem that the plaintiff sued this case. Is the exercise of rights in bad faith? It is a matter of power to sue and is a law on peace, although the defendant did not provide the fight. I have the right to raise the appeal or a petition under Section 225 paragraph two and Section 249 paragraph two of the Court of First Instance recorded facts or any actions. It takes place during the sitting in the report of the proceedings. Acting under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 48 so that the Court of First Instance recorded that the plaintiff divorced the defendant that can not hold that. The report is a divorce notice by consent. And the judge or associate judge who signed it in the report. It is signed by the law. Not a signature as a witness under Section 1514, paragraph two.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 865/2540.

Memorandum between the plaintiff and the defendant. Both parties agree to divorce on the specified date. After the men and women compromise, the plaintiff sued. Divorce before the defendant. This agreement is subject to conditions precedent. So, when there is no compromise agreement in court, which is not. Because the defendant did not follow. The divorce registration agreement is still not enforceable. The plaintiff will force the defendant to register the divorce with the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 592/2538.

While the plaintiff sued the case, it turns out that the plaintiff's defendant volunteered to be divorced. The husband will register the divorce at the district office. Only one is incomplete under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1514, paragraph two. The plaintiff sued the defendant to divorce the plaintiff from the books.

Section 1515 when married under this Code. Divorce by consent is complete only when the husband and wife have registered the divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6080/2540.

The plaintiff and the defendant is legally registered 1, the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant will terminate. And the lack of husband and wife under Section 1501 of the law is effective when the divorce is registered under Section 1515 and the Court of First Instance issues specific disputes related to property. The plaintiff has half the ownership of the property in the end of the lawsuit. And the transfer of land deed dispute with the house between the defendant 1 and the defendant 2 and 3 are intentional catch or not. There is no power lawsuit. Including the division of the property between the plaintiff and the defendant as follows: the Court of Appeal raised the issue of power to sue that the plaintiff and the defendant did not divorce. The plaintiff has no power to sue to divide the property. It's not like

The plaintiff and the defendant is absent from the husband and wife, the property is made between the cohabitation. Not divided by the provisions of the ownership. The plaintiff and the defendant are the sole owner and are assumed to have equal shares under Section 1357.

Plaintiff sued the plaintiff in the car registration. Although the manual is not a valid document of ownership of a car, it is only one testimony of the annual tax liability. This indicates that the person named in the car registration manual should be the owner, but only if the owner of the car, the ownership of the car transferred to the buyer immediately. Therefore, having the owner's name included in the vehicle registration leaflet is worthwhile. The benefits to those who want to buy cars with the owner to know that. Buying a car requires the consent of all owners before it. Cut down on potential problems in the case of a car belonging to several individuals. There is only one owner in the car registration manual. The buyer bought without knowing that there are total owners who did not give consent to sell. Make sure the total owner does not consent and the buyer has been damaged by the lawsuit. The lawsuit was revoked.

It is more beneficial than not signing up for a car registration manual. When the plaintiff is the defendant in the ownership of the vehicle in dispute. Should be punished by the plaintiff to the plaintiff, the owner included in the note. Register the car as requested.

The plaintiff asked the defendant to transfer ownership of movable property to the plaintiff. When it appears Originally movable property was filed under the ownership of the defendant 1 by the ownership of the total. And it does not appear that the plaintiff was disputed. In addition, there is no law that requires the owners to collect their property. The plaintiff has no right to ask the defendant to transfer possession of movable property. Complaints to the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 865/2540.

The Memorandum of Understanding "The right and the women agreed to go. A divorce is filed on the day at the Huaykwang Bangkok office. The woman carried out a compromise agreement at the Central Juvenile and Family Court, "This agreement is a condition when the condition has not. I have not had a compromise agreement with the court and the youth. Central kitchen as agreed, despite claims that have not yet entered into a compromise agreement. Because the defendant does not comply with the agreement on the cost of parenting. But when I can not even hear the reason for not signing a compromise agreement. The defendant is not in compliance with the terms of the agreement. Case will claim that the defendant is not party to the agreement in the memorandum. The agreement is not a divorce registration agreement in the memorandum. The plaintiff will not force the defendant to register the divorce. The plaintiff has not.

Section 1516. The reasons for divorce are as follows.

(1) husband or wife, foster or honor others, my wife or husband Adultery Or to have sex with another person. The other party filed for divorce.

(2) husband or wife behave badly Whether the behavior is a criminal offense? If the other party

(A) has been severely disgraceful;

(B) To be despised by hatred for the sake of the husband or wife of the evil party?

(C) have been damaged or misplaced; When the condition It is a good idea to make sure that you are getting the best deal.

The other party filed for divorce.

(3) husband or wife harm Or torture the body or mind Or to defame or disparage the other party or the other party's if it is serious. The other party filed for divorce.

(4) The husband or wife deliberately abandoned the other party for more than one year. The other party filed for divorce.

(4/1) Husband or wife must be sentenced to the maximum sentence. He has been imprisoned for more than one year in an offense committed by another party. The offense or consent or conspiracy to commit the offense. And the husband will continue to cause the other party to be damaged. Or too late. The other party filed for divorce.

(4/2) Husband and wife voluntarily separate because they can not live together. Or separated by court order for more than three years. One of them divorced.

(5) The husband or wife is ordered by the court to be a person discharged. Or go away from his domicile or residence for more than three years without knowing that. How are good dead? The other party filed for divorce.

(6) Does the husband or wife not provide reasonable parental support? Act as an adversary to a husband or wife serious if the action is so bad that the other party suffered too much when the condition. It is a good idea to make sure that you are getting the best deal. The other party filed for divorce.

(7) The husband or wife has been insane for more than three years. And insanity is difficult to recover. I will not be able to live together with my husband. The other party filed for divorce.

(8) A spouse or spouse who has made a written parole The other party filed for divorce.

(9) A husband or wife is a serious communicable disease that may harm the other party and the disease is chronic. There is no way to cure it. The other party filed for divorce.

(10) The husband or wife has physical condition. The husband or wife can not commit to eternal life. The other party filed for divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 820/2559.

The plaintiff recorded several episodes in a notebook showing that the plaintiff had a love affair with another man. The family is split up normal. The other side must suffer. Considered to have suffered too much. Such action is considered to be a serious husband or wife according to Section 1516 (6)

In the civil case, the prosecutor is responsible for the fact that the defendant is the principal defendant. The lawsuit is a court case, so even the defendant will claim divorce in accordance with the law. Section 1516 (1). However, when the facts of the case are derived from the succession of both parties, it is considered a divorce under Section 1516. (6) The Supreme Court has the power to adjust the law to the facts of the case.

Defendant 1 intends to transfer the land, which is the private property of the defendant to the plaintiff, a complete contract has entered into force. Such land is a private property of the plaintiff under Section 1471 (3), not private property of the defendant. Even land is private property of the plaintiff. When the plaintiff sued the land to the plaintiff. The court can not be judged more than the plaintiff's request under Section 142 Civil Code. Section 142

Judgment of the Supreme Court 13552/2558.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 10770/2558.

The plaintiff sued the plaintiff's marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant void because of the duplicate marriage, the defendant filed a new lawsuit. The Supreme Court's Department of Juvenile and Family Court has finally decided to proceed with the new reconsideration process, since the subpoena and copy of the complaint. The plaintiff sought to amend the lawsuit by filing a new plaint, claiming that the plaintiff's marriage to the defendant was fraudulent, so let's clear the void as if the plaintiff waived or abolished the charge in the original lawsuit and changed the new charge in accordance with the new lawsuit. The charges against the original indictment ended. Filing a new defendant's case is not a reason for the interruption.

The plaintiff cared for and raised the plaintiff in the husband and wife since 2007. At that time, the Court of First Instance ruled that the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant void. When the Supreme Court has a judgment of the Court of First Instance. Judgment of the Court of First Instance is to terminate the plaintiff and the defendant returned to the status of the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant is still in accordance with the law. The defendant has the right and is protected as a wife by law. When the plaintiff cared for and raised the plaintiff as a wife together until the date of the plaintiff and the defendant. The action of the plaintiff is a continuation of the incident that continues all the time without stopping or ending. The defendant still has the right to divorce the plaintiff. The defendant's indemnity shall not be terminated pursuant to Section 1529, paragraph one.

The plaintiff and the defendant separated from the end of 1995 until the date of filing and counting for about 16 years without appearing that one party is trying to return to eat together husband and wife. I have a lawsuit against both parties. The lawyer said that the plaintiffs and the defendants were separate because they could not live together. My husband and I have been living happily for more than 3 years. Section 1516 (1) contains, however, that the cause of the divorce is not the sole fault of the plaintiff. Case No. 1526 is therefore not eligible to claim compensation from the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1292/2558.

Act on the conflict of law, BE 2481, Section 27, paragraph one, stipulates that the Siamese courts will not be sentenced to divorce. Unless the law of nationality of both husband and wife allows divorce. The plaintiff is not the plaintiff, but the plaintiff is not a legal expert in England testified document. In the English law. Do not divorce before the end of the three years from the date of marriage. When the plaintiff asserted. The law of England allows spouses to divorce. The defendants did not dispute the facts. Only claims that the law of England has a divorce and that the law has not yet passed. Does not argue the existence of the law that the plaintiff's evidence, so whether the plaintiff's attorney will be a lawyer in England? The fact is that I have heard that. The law of England allows spouses to divorce each other. In accordance with the provisions of the provisions of the conflict of law, Section 27, paragraph one, the Thai court has the power to consider further. The divorce that the plaintiff claimed in the suit. Is divorce lawful in Thailand?

Dismissal means that one of the spouses intends not to share with me husband and wife. I have left the other. It is abandoned because of need or reason. The fact of the abandonment of the testimony of all witnesses are not true. The plaintiff took the defendant to eat together at the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The plaintiff refused to return to Thailand, contrary to the agreement of the plaintiff, the defendant before the marriage, the plaintiff asked the defendant to be married by the plaintiff, the defendant agreed to live in Bangkok, so the defendant returned to Thailand. Therefore, it is not dismissed by the legal plaintiff. The plaintiff can not claim abandonment as a divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8943/2557.

The wife has the right to claim compensation from another woman who has a relationship with her husband by the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, paragraph one, which states that. "When the court decides to divorce for reasons of section 1516 (1), the wife or husband is entitled to compensation from the husband or wife and from the foster or grandparents or the person who causes the divorce." The plaintiff will receive compensation from the defendant, so it must be the case that the court sentenced the plaintiff and the divorce, and why the foster care or honor my wife, adulterer or co-defendant. Prostitution with the defendant When it appears that the plaintiff and his divorce by compromise agreement with the court. Even the court has a verdict. The compromise agreement is not acceptable to the complainant and the testimony. It is not the case that the court sentenced to divorce due to divorce under Section 1516 (1) The plaintiff is not entitled to compensation from the defendant in accordance with the provisions of the law, and even the provisions of the Civil Code. Section 1523, second paragraph, gives the wife the right to claim compensation from another woman who is openly disclosing that she has a relationship with her husband in the affair. No divorce by divorce under Section 1516 (1), but according to the plaintiff's lawsuit, the lawsuit described the case by claiming that the defendant disclosed that the defendant has no relationship with the plaintiff's husband in the affair. It does not raise the issue that the plaintiff will accuse the facts.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8611/2557.

The plaintiff sued the defendant, the husband claimed that. Defendant suffering the body and mind of the plaintiff under Section 1516 (3) by the lawsuit. Defendant acts as an adversary by using impolite speech and arguments with the plaintiff for no reason. The defendant holds a kitchen knife standing out of the plaintiff to leave the house and threaten to kill to death if the past photos of the plaintiff and threatened to hurt the plaintiff with a severe emotional irrational. The plaintiff escaped from the house because fear of being attacked. The plaintiff's assertion. The defendant used a knife to threaten the plaintiff to commit prostitution with the plaintiff is not comfortable and do not want to commit prostitution. The plaintiff feels very physically and mentally. The reason for the divorce as described by the plaintiff in the lawsuit. Is not the defendant in addition to the petition of the defendant in any way. The plaintiff has the right to sue the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8819/2056.

Court of First Instance judges plaintiff and defendant divorce The two children in the jurisdiction of the plaintiff. The defendant paid the foster care and divided the Sin Somros. The defendant appealed only on the issue of divorce only. It is a request to release the suffering can not be calculated as money. So the appeal fee is not worth the money.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2670/2056.

The circumstances to be divorced under Section 1516 (4/2), unless the husband has to voluntarily separate for more than 3 years, it must be separated because of the inability to coexist. I have a husband with my wife.

Plaintiff's defendant made a memorandum of understanding compromise. I do not wish to share my wife's life anymore until the date of the lawsuit for more than 3 years, but the plaintiff can not live together with my husband. Court of First Instance The plaintiff does not fight. But the plaintiff received. The defendant never behaved badly or behaved badly to be against the husband. The defendant's assertion that the plaintiff was courted by another woman weighed more than the evidence of the plaintiff. So listen to the fact. The plaintiff did not want to live with the defendant and go from his homeland. The defendant is willing to be the spouse of the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not appeal. What is the reason for the decision of the Court of First Instance? The facts must be heard, terminated by the Court of First Instance. Even the text in the memorandum compromise. Plaintiff defendant does not want to live together, husband and wife together anymore. But the text just shows that. The plaintiff only voluntarily split. I do not think it is voluntary to separate because the plaintiff and the defendant can not live together, my husband is usually happy. Not divorced under Section 1516 (4/2), no matter how long they are separated.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 11702/2555.

Divorce under Section 1516 (4/1) that "husband or wife must be sentenced to the maximum sentence. And has been imprisoned for more than one year in an offense in which the other party has not contributed to the commission of the offense, or has consented or consented to the offense. The husband and wife will also cause the other party to be damaged or overwhelmed. The other party is required to file a divorce. "It must be the case that the plaintiff suffered excessive damage or misbehavior during the defendant's term of imprisonment and was sentenced to more than one year if the defendant was released from imprisonment. The plaintiff can not be damaged or misplaced because the defendant must be imprisoned longer. When the case is the defendant must be finally sentenced to imprisonment and imprisonment for more than a year ago by the offender, the plaintiff did not contribute to or consent to the crime. The plaintiff sued the defendant for divorce under Section 1516 (4/1), but the plaintiff sued the case after the defendant was imprisoned for more than a year and has been released for five years, so the damage or suffering of the plaintiff ended. already The plaintiff has no right to sue divorce defendant by virtue of Section 1516 (4/1)

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4480/2553.

The plaintiff and the defendant quarreled violently, the plaintiff hit the defendant and the plaintiff told the defendant to move out of the flat at police flats to the home of the sins of the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff's phone to the defendant's father to the defendant. The defendant took the daughter of the plaintiff and the defendant. Even the plaintiff and the defendant will not be consecutive for more than a year, the action of the defendant is not considered abandoned by the plaintiff under Section 1516 (4), which will cause a divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4480/2553.

The defendant, a wife, moved from the residence of the plaintiff, a police flat to live in the district of Nam Tap because the plaintiff told to move. The plaintiff's phone to the defendant's father to the defendant. The home of the district of Nam Tap is the land of the plaintiff and the defendant as a joint Sin Som. The action of the defendant is not considered abandoning the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not claiming divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6516/2552.

Even the defendant will never take the second defendant to the society, or recommend that other people know as the wife, but the two defendants go together openly in the house, which was built in the community together in time. Night Drive a car when you go to work or buy food together. It indicates that the two defendants have a relationship, I love and caring care for each other. The defendant to pay tribute to the defendant, I 2, as a divorce under Section 1516 (1), and the plaintiff has the right to claim compensation from the defendant's second disclosure that I have a relationship. With the defendant, the plaintiff's husband to jointly liable to the defendant to the plaintiff under Section 1523, paragraph one as well.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4959/2552.

The purpose of marriage is to allow men and women to live in my husband's wife. Section 1461 provides that husbands and wives support each other according to their own abilities and status, and Section 1598/38 stipulates that the cost of parenting. Fellowships may be called when foster care is not available. This means that the foster care costs may be imposed by the court. Considering the capacity of the provider and the status of the receiver in accordance with the circumstances of the case. It is a provision of protection for husbands and wives who have a good position to support another parent. Otherwise, the other party has the right to file a divorce under Section 1516 (6), but if not willing to file for divorce, According to Section 1598/38, therefore, the right to sue for foster care is not a right that arises when a divorce is filed.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4678/2552.

The plaintiff is the lawful wife of the defendant, while the plaintiff filed the case, the defendant continued to foster and honor the second defendant I wife, which is a continuation of the plaintiff since the facts. The divorce case under Section 1516 (1) is still in place and the plaintiff will divorce for divorce. It does not matter whether the plaintiff will know the facts before suing more than a year or not. The plaintiff's right to sue is not suspended under Section 1529.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2498/2552.

According to Section 1525, paragraph one stipulates that the replacement of a court case to divorce because of husband or wife, foster or honor others, my wife or husband, adultery or adultery, or engage with others as a plea under Section 1516 (1) The wife or husband is entitled to compensation from husband or wife and from other women or adulteration under Section 1523, paragraph one. The court will order the payment on time or in installments. There is a time limit that the court may deem appropriate. And the second paragraph states that. In case the person has to pay the spouse's compensation to the other party. The court considers the amount of property the spouse receives from the divorce because of the divorce. When the plaintiff claimed compensation from the defendant, the spouse is 5 million baht, without showing a special circumstance that the plaintiff should be compensated for the amount. The court must therefore determine the spirit of the plaintiff. Defendants and the circumstances of the case. The property of the plaintiff has been divided by the two lower court judgments under the provisions of Section 1525, which, when considering that the two lower court fees due to the defendant cared for other women I wife is 500,000 baht It is appropriate for the circumstances, then there is no reason for the Supreme Court to set more compensation.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2345/2552.

The plaintiff sued by the divorce under Section 1516 (4) by the defendant deliberately abandoned the abandoned plaintiff for more than one year did not specify the voluntary separation, because they can not coexist. Usually happy forever. Even the plaintiff will claim a separate agreement under the document at the end of the indictment. But divorce under Section 1516 (4/2) does not have a separate period of more than three years. There must be another element. I have to be because I can not live together. The plaintiff did not describe the element. The plaintiff's complaint on this issue is not like. The plaintiff's indictment is not divorced under the provisions of Section 1516 (4/2), the plaintiff admitted that the plaintiff is out of the home of the defendant to himself. Therefore, the plaintiff is voluntarily separate from the defendant. Defendant is separate with the plaintiff, but not. The defendant did not abandon the abandoned plaintiff for more than a year. Will cause the plaintiff to file a divorce under Section 1516 (4)

Judgment of the Supreme Court 994/2552.

The defendant has a letter of complaint to the plaintiff's supervisor and plaintiff's teacher in the master's degree on the plaintiff's personal conduct. The defendant as a wife is love and jealousy husband has the right to do. To the supervisor of the plaintiff and the instructor plaintiff warned the plaintiff to remind the family. Case can not hold that the plaintiff is to be reproached, and the plaintiff was not disciplined serious. The plaintiff will claim that the case is that the defendant acted inconsistently with the wife. The plaintiff has no right to sue the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 5664/2551.

Although the defendant's statement does not explicitly state the law as an excuse for the lack of However, the divorce that determines the age or suspension of the right to claim is only Section 1529 of the Civil and Commercial Code, one of the grounds for divorce under Section 1516 (3) and (6) as a cause of divorce in the case. this It is considered that the defendant to fight the plaintiff's case or the lawsuit because of such a lawsuit is suspended. When the plaintiff's actions against the husband or wife of a serious defendant began to count from 2001. The plaintiff sued the defendant in this case in 2003, one year after the date of the plaintiff knows or should know. The fact that they raised the claim. The lawsuit of the plaintiff by the cause of such a suspension.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2851/2551.

The defendant is a husband and wife will have a feudal fight is a normal life of the couple, the defendant is not at home is not a misdemeanor. And the defendant hit the plaintiff to hurt the plaintiff to the plaintiff to the prosecution, but the defendant. The interrogation was a matter within the family. The plaintiff did not wish to prosecute the defendant. Then the defendant plaintiff also quarrel and the defendant tried to assault the plaintiff. This behavior also does not hold that the defendant is against the husband. The wife is so serious that the plaintiff suffered too much. The plaintiff sued the divorce under Section 1516 (6)

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6948/2550.

Despite the circumstances of the plaintiff in the initial expression of the defendant's consent to do. It's in Japan. But after about 2 years, since 1999, the plaintiff has asked the defendant to take care of the family several times. The plaintiff does not agree to work in Japan. But the defendant still not confirmed back to Thailand and not consent to return to Thailand. Testify in this case. The defendant wishes to work in Japan without any interest to return. My son and I are living with the plaintiff. The defendant deliberately abandoned the plaintiff to more than 1 year since 1999, the plaintiff sued the defendant under Section 1516 (4)

Both of the plaintiff and the defendant are minor and in the plaintiff's patronage throughout the plaintiff's career as a stable. The defendant worked in Japan, leaving his son to be in the custody of the plaintiff for more than 8 years, taking into account the maximum benefit to both minors today and in the future it is appropriate for the plaintiff to use the authority to govern the child. Second only

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6625/2549.

According to the Act on the conflict of law, Section 27, paragraph one, the court shall not adjudicate divorce. Unless the law of nationality of both husband and wife allows divorce. This means that the law of a country based on nationality, both spouses must have a chapter. The rules governing the divorce or divorce. The Thai court will have jurisdiction to divorce. It must not be divorced by the consent of the spouse. When the plaintiff is an American citizen. Law of the State of Georgia United States The terms of divorce and the provisions of the law of Thailand. Divorce conditions The plaintiff has the power to divorce.

For divorce under Section 27 paragraph two of the Act on conflict of law. According to the law of the place where the lawsuit is filed, The fact that the defendant married on March 19, 1988 after marriage for about 6 months, conflicts because of cultural differences do not understand. The defendant does not care to learn and adapt to sluggishness, but the comfort does not work home. Do not associate with anyone and do not like social tasks, except for the necessary tasks. But like an informal party that has fun. The fight is a regular. I pledge to the plaintiff to defend the defendant back. But never quarrel. I just do not talk when I'm angry. Even in the first defendants do not want to have sex with the plaintiff. Later, the defendant plaintiffs are not willing to have another sexual relationship. Plaintiff's defendant is a husband to wife for up to 13 years, the circumstances of the defendant can not hold that the defendant acted in a hostile way. The husband is so serious that the other party suffered too much. When the condition My husband and wife are considered to be under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (6), the plaintiff has no cause for divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3192/2549.

Section 1461 is a provision in Chapter 3 on the relationship between husband and wife. After the marriage, Section 2 of the marriage. Section 1561 (4) or (6) if the parties violate Section 1461 of the marriage. ) That the other spouse may bring to lawsuit only. When there is no divorce between the plaintiff and the police, and no judgment of the court to divorce. The marriage between the plaintiff and the police lie on the law. Even if the plaintiff and the police lie not together and did not help caring in the latter did not have. The effect on the integrity of the marriage between the plaintiff and the police. The plaintiff is still the lawful wife of the police lie on the law when the defendant married a police officer, while the police lie on the plaintiff, the plaintiff is a spouse is a marriage violation. Of marriage in Section 1452, and void under Section 1495. Even then, the police lie in the death. The plaintiff is a stakeholder who has the power to sue the marriage between the defendant and the police void.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3190/2549.

The consent and forgiveness of a divorce can not be filed under Section 1517, paragraph one, and Section 1518 refers to spouses who agree and forgive all facts about the act. Cause the right to file a divorce. However, it is expressly stated that it is permissible to act or not to file a divorce. The fact that the plaintiff did not sue the defendant, but the first to know. The relationship between the defendant and the defendant because the plaintiff is not known. And it is not expected that the defendant will be serious with the MP, because at that time, the defendant also many other women. Until the plaintiff knows that the defendant with a son together with the lawsuit filed. The plaintiff's circumstances. I do not know whether the plaintiff has ever accepted or forgiven the defendant, foster care, or praise the wife of the plaintiff, I have the right to divorce for divorce.

Fostering or exhorting other women is a cause of divorce in a continuing manner. As long as the defendant also fosters or praises the wife, the wife of divorce under Section 1516 (1) is still present. Even the plaintiff to know the circumstances of the defendant for more than a year, then the plaintiff is a cause for divorce. The plaintiff's lawsuit is not suspended under Section 1529.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2520/2549.

Even in 1974, the plaintiff was abandoned by the defendant by the defendant, the defendant had been living together. But in 1976, the defendant had a relationship with his wife, Mrs. Saha, and one child. The defendant did not want to live with me husband wife to the plaintiff as well. same And between the separate, the plaintiff did not return to eat my husband and wife with the defendant, the defendant, knowing that the plaintiff is not interested in any place or find a way. I'm with the plaintiff's husband. The plaintiff's defense of the different people for up to 25 years, it is considered that the plaintiff and the defendant voluntarily separate because I can not coexist. Husbands are usually happy for more than three years. The divorce under Section 1516 (4/2), the plaintiff sued the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6471/2548.

Defendant is separate from the plaintiff because the defendant plaintiff can not live together. The wife is usually happy over 3 years, the plaintiff has the right to file a divorce under Section 1516 (4/2), and when the defendant has a minor child, the court has jurisdiction to the plaintiff. A user of the governing power and the defendant pay. Foster care for minors under Section 1520, paragraph two, and Section 1522, paragraph two, shall not exceed the request.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 5983/2548.

Article 28 stipulates that a person shall exercise his rights and liberties as far as he does not violate the rights and freedoms of Therefore, even if the choice of spouse is entitled to the protection of the constitution, which is The right of the plaintiff to choose their own spouse. However, the exercise of such rights shall not cause the other person to suffer and shall be subject to the limits of the law, whereby the law provides for the exercise of such right. The plaintiff was eating her husband and wife with the defendant and married lawfully, then later the plaintiff dissatisfied with the separation of the defendant filed a lawsuit. By claiming that the plaintiff's right to choose a spouse, but their satisfaction is not right because the exercise of the plaintiff's rights will affect the defendant, the wife and child if the plaintiff wishes to divorce the defendant. There are grounds to claim under Section 1516. Otherwise family institutions in society will be exploited and there is confusion.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4156/2548.

The plaintiff and the defendant registered the marriage and then eat together husband and wife for only two months. Subsequently, the defendant went to military service and disarmed in 1988, after the defendant discharged the military, then the defendant did not return to live with the plaintiff, husband and wife until the year 2533, the plaintiff went to live with my husband and wife. Have children together The defendant's case is that the defendant deliberately abandoned the plaintiff to more than one year since the defendant's military discharge in 1988, the plaintiff sued the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3563/2548.

The plaintiff has a circumstance that would have a relationship with another woman. The plaintiff's jealousy caused a fight at all. At the same father and mother, the plaintiff used to borrow money from the plaintiff and then returned to the plaintiff later to ask the plaintiff to mortgage the land to bring a loan. Travel expenses To work abroad But the defendant refused to sign consent for mortgage registration. So quarrel Plaintiff defendant wrote a memorandum by the plaintiff to defend the defendant before the plaintiff and the defendant. People each class. The defendant was dismissed by the court as if the parent was sent before the plaintiff. The defendant said that the defendant's daughter did not approach the plaintiff and that this guy if not fumbled. I have it all out. It is a deliberate act to remind your daughter to be careful. The only words that are not appropriate to the mother only. In addition, the defendant said that the plaintiff's dissent and the plaintiff's mother caused by the plaintiff and mother. The plaintiff contributed to the defendant to do so. It also can not hear that the defendant plaintiff plaintiff and the mother plaintiff serious plaintiff. Will claim as a cause of divorce under Section 1516 (3)

Judgment of the Supreme Court 116/2547.

The Supreme Court has sentenced the defendant to a defendant who is the owner of the caretaker and manager of prostitution and charged with selling or giving. Tape and television materials are not allowed. At that time, the plaintiff was a deputy district in Songkhla province, the defendant is the plaintiff's wife, which is a senior civil servant, but the defendant is a defendant in the offense against the public order and bad morals of the people until the Supreme Court has sentenced the defendant to prison. No. 1 action of the defendant to the plaintiff's husband was severely disgraceful. With hateful insults This is a divorce case under Section 1516 (2) (a) (b)

Section 1517. The case for divorce under Section 1516 (1) and (2) if the husband or wife, as the case may be. Have agreed or disagreed with the act of divorce. The parties agree or disagree that the cause is not divorced.

If a divorce is filed under section 1516 (10), if the other party is the cause, the other party will not be able to file for divorce.

In the case of divorce by virtue of a parole under Section 1516 (8), if the court finds that the conduct of the husband or wife causes the parole to be a small event. I do not want to live with my husband. The court will not judge the divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3190/2549.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3596/2546.

Plaintiff's marriage to the defendant with two children, the second defendant to the first marriage to the second defendant and to eat openly, but not divorced with the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed for divorce by raising a child from the defendant and claim compensation from the two defendants. Even the plaintiff will know that the two defendants are married and have been eating together since 1993, but the two defendants are eating together until the filing date. The action of the two defendants is a violation of the plaintiff. Stop the action, so do not start counting. Plaintiff's case does not terminate.

Even the plaintiff will see photographs of the wedding ceremony of the two defendants later and not counter. Objectionable But while celebrating the wedding ceremony of the two defendants. The plaintiff did not know the case is not enough to hear that the plaintiff has the defendant both. Two are married as husband and wife under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1517, paragraph one, the plaintiff has the right to file a divorce.

The defendant is a foster and honor the second defendant, which is my wife, which is divorced under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (1), and the court sentenced the plaintiff and the defendant to a divorce. The plaintiff has the right to claim compensation from the two defendants under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, first paragraph.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3288/2527.

The defendant is a wife husband with the plaintiff. Defendant has a career in drug trafficking. The plaintiff witnessed and co-operated with the plaintiff's relatives, the plaintiff brought heroin from the north. Until the relatives of the plaintiff and the defendant was arrested by the police. The court held that the defendant for 20 years, the plaintiff has the consent or witness. The mind of the defendant is a divorce, the plaintiff is raised as a cause for divorce.

Section 1518. The right to file a divorce has expired when the party who has the right to file a divorce has acted in a way that shows that it has forgiven the other party's actions, thereby giving rise to the right to file a divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2473/2013.

Although faxes to the defendant to the defendant, some messages have details about the divorce. This divorce is the consent of both parties. Without filing for divorce between the defendants. If the case is an act that shows that the plaintiff forgave the actions of the two defendants and the right to divorce, then it must be said that the spouses who have the right to divorce are intended to forgive. Repatriate spouse returned to family status. The spouses of both parties intend to come back to live with me husband next. The plaintiff's request to move the property of the plaintiff out of the house that was once eaten with the defendant, no circumstances that the plaintiff and the defendant will live to eat my husband's wife again. In addition, the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit against the defendant in an attempt to kill. According to the circumstances, it is not in the mind of the plaintiff and the defendant will return to eat my husband the same wife next. The plaintiff has not forgiven the defendant will cause the right to file a divorce under Section 1518.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3190/2549.

The consent and forgiveness of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1518 refers to spouses who agree and forgive all facts about the action. Cause the right to file a divorce. However, the intent is to appear explicitly allowing or not to exercise the right to divorce.

The plaintiff is not known. And it is not expected that the defendant will be serious with the defendant because there are many other women until 2002, the plaintiff knew that the defendant with the son of a lawsuit was brought to court. The plaintiff did not sue the defendant, but the first to know about the relationship. Between the defendant and the MP did not hold that the plaintiff has ever accepted or forgiven the defendant, foster care, or praise the wife of the plaintiff, I have the right to divorce the defendant because of divorce.

Foster or honor other women as a cause for divorce in a continuous manner as long as the defendant also fosters or exhorts her husband to divorce under Section 1516 (1) is still available. Even the plaintiff to know the circumstances of the defendant for more than a year, then the plaintiff is a cause for divorce. The plaintiff's lawsuit is not suspended under Section 1529.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 173/2540.

Plaintiff's defendant later married to the defendant. M. A wife, the plaintiff has filed a divorce court defendant. The plaintiff mediated the defendant agreed that the defendant will be back in the same house. The plaintiff is not related to other women, the plaintiff has withdrawn to appear after. The lawsuit was filed with the defendant. My husband's wife later the plaintiff sued the plaintiff because the plaintiff agreed terms with the plaintiff. When the defendant did not comply with the conditions, it is not the case that the plaintiff forgives the defendant. The action of the defendant can be considered as a hostile husband or wife. The cause of divorce filed under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (6)

Judgment of the Supreme Court 7229/2537.

The divorce case under Section 1516 (4) of the Civil and Commercial Code shall be subject to the intention of the husband or wife to abandon the other party. The defendant plaintiff and the defendant did not move the plaintiff. There are justifiable reasons to separate. The defendant did not travel to the plaintiff. Because the plaintiff argued. I have a suspicion that the plaintiff supported the other women I wife. I can not hear that the defendant deliberately deserted the plaintiff. The defendant destroyed the property and took the property. Because the defendant controversial plaintiff and defendant suspect that the plaintiff favors. See other women I'm the wife of the plaintiff. The defendant was made to feel guilty and angry until the emotional control and the plaintiff did not notify. The plaintiff accused the defendant as destroying the property and took the property. Show that the plaintiff forgave the defendant. The right to file a divorce is finalized under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1518.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2561/2536.

The plaintiff brought other women into the house and come to eat together, husband and wife have one child by the plaintiff to use the surname plaintiff. This circumstance holds that the plaintiff fosters or exalts my wife. The defendant filed a divorce lawsuit. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (1) May 1977. Defendant bickering defendant bash. The defendant dismissed the plaintiff from the house. After that, the plaintiff also came to the defendant, and had been accused to eat together. In 1980, the plaintiff to the defendant came to the 3-4 months, the defendant was the father, the plaintiff fired from the house. Back to the original home. The plaintiff also came to the defendant by the money to use 4,000 baht per month in 1984. Plaintiffs claim that the plaintiff said that the ordained good and visit the defendant to send money to the defendant 4,000 baht per month just refrained from sending money from January. 1986, as follows: Although the plaintiff has a lawsuit to divorce the defendant. The circumstances that appear that the plaintiff forgave in the action of the defendant. The lawsuit of the plaintiff's divorce is gone. Civil and Commercial Code Section 1518. The reason for the divorce is the fault of the plaintiff, the only one who fosters and praised. Another wife Defendant does not have any occupation, the plaintiff has given the defendant a cost of 4,000 baht per month, so that the plaintiff defendant will make the defendant broke down. Defendant is entitled to a contribution from the plaintiff. Civil and Commercial Code Section 1526

Section 1519. In the event that one of the spouses is insane and has divorce, It will happen before or after being insane. The person who may request the court to order the insane person to be an incompetent under Section 28 shall have the power to sue the other spouse. The court shall order the divorce judge to divorce and divide the property in such case. If there is no order of the court to show that the spouse is insane, the insolvency. In the same case, the court orders that the spouse The insanity is incompetent.

When such person sees fit. To request a court order under Section 1526 or Section 1530.

In cases where spouses who are claimed to be insane have not been ordered to be incompetent. If the court finds that the spouse is not the person to be ordered to be an incompetent, then the case should be dismissed. If you see that the person should be ordered to be an incompetent. It is not appropriate to divorce. The court shall order the spouse to be incompetent by not ordering the preschooler or by appointing another person as a kindergarten under Section 1463. The sentence shall remain valid only for the divorce. In such cases, the court may order the payment of a fine. In cases where the court considers that the spouse is insane, he or she should be ordered to be an incompetent and divorcee. The court shall order the spouse to be the incapable of setting up the kindergarten and divorce.

In this case, if the court finds that the reason for the divorce raised in the lawsuit is unsuitable for the condition of A spouse who is unable to divorce from another spouse. The circumstances are not appropriate to divorce from each other. The court will not allow the divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 564/2510.

According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1524 is a provision on the method of proof of legitimate childbirth as a result of Article 1519, which is a provision for children born in marriage, which is presumably the law. The son of a husband If there is a claim that a child is a married woman lawfully. It can be proved by the way under Section 1524 that the offspring whose parents are not legally married shall be children. Lawful by the provisions of Section 1526. Not that the circumstances under Section 1524 is a way to certify illegitimate children. The statutory child goes beyond Section 1526.

When the Court of First Instance has an order to investigate only a single property dispute, the defendant argues that there are other issues to be investigated. Defendant will come to argue that the court has the order. I do not know if that is true or not. According to the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 226 because such a court order is not an order under Section 227, 228

Section 1520 in the case of divorce by consent. Make sure your spouse agrees in writing that he or she will use the child's authority. If not agreed or agreed. The court is the arbitrator.

In case of divorce by a court judgment The court hearing the case for divorce decides which party will use the authority to govern the child. If the court finds that there is a reason to withdraw the spouse's parental authority under Section 1582, the court shall revoke the spouse's parental authority and order the third party to be the ruling. The court shall take into account the well-being and the merits of the spouse. Son is important

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8056/2559.

Even the plaintiff, the first and second plaintiff's father filed a divorce with the plaintiff, the first jointly stated that the plaintiff's second child is under the jurisdiction of the am agreed. The plaintiff's power to join the second plaintiff under Section 1520, paragraph one, Section 1566 (6), the plaintiff is not a power of law and no right to act on behalf of the plaintiff. The request for compensation for damages to reputation Damages to the body and mind. Damages to freedom and damages suffered. Can be considered as an act on behalf of the plaintiff, the co-2 who is a minor. Although the application is not in accordance with the provisions on the ability of the person under Section 56 paragraph two of the Civil Code Section 56, Section 40, but the age of the plaintiff in the second case. Under consideration of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff's co-2 years over the age of 20 years out of the status of minors and underage. There is no need and no grounds for the Supreme Court to issue a correction order on the ability of the plaintiff to join the second plaintiff can do any other. Without the consent of the parent or a legitimate representative under Section 21, when the facts are heard. The defendant brought the plaintiff to the second to indecency and do. Offense to the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the second plaintiff is entitled to compensation from the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 5535/2558.

In the divorce case, even the plaintiff will not be able to attest to the authority of the child. The court has the power to decide whether any party is authorized to govern any child and the other party to pay child support, according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1520, paragraph two and Section 1522, paragraph two, when the facts. Since the defendant's 1st child, the behavior has changed and the divorce was due to the defendant's fault with the defendant and the first defendant did not give or testify that the defendant will be the first. Take control of both minors. The two lower courts determine the plaintiff is the user of both minors and the defendant. 1 Pay child support up to 4,000 baht per month until the adult will like it.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6471/2548.

While the plaintiff and defendant separately. The defendant made a plaintiff's complaint to the plaintiff's supervisor that the plaintiff has. I have a relationship with another person. The plaintiff may be disciplined. And the plaintiff, which is a woman, was embarrassed to colleagues. Neighbors or guests Show that the defendant did not seek to live with my husband husband wife. So far, it has done the most feigning of the feud. Together And from the date of the separation until the date of filing for a period of up to 4 years, the defendant did not send to bear the plaintiff or return to the plaintiff again. Such circumstances can be heard that the defendant voluntarily separate with the plaintiff because of that. Plaintiff defendant can not live together, husband and wife are usually happy for more than 3 years, the plaintiff has the right to sue divorce defendant under Section 1516 (4/2), and in this case, the plaintiff defendant has a minor child. With one person in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1520, paragraph two states that: "In the case of divorce by a court judgment, the court hearing the case for divorce shall decide whether any party shall have power to govern the child. "And Section 1522, paragraph two, that" A divorce by a court judgment or in the case of a divorce agreement does not impose a charge. Parenting The court has set up "as though no party raised any claim. The court has the power to make judicial decisions. Not judging over requests. The two lower courts did not diagnose such matters. It's not like

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2960/2548.

Later, the divorcee and the dissenter have an agreement on the use of the power that the minors are in. The father of the child is the right to use the right to govern the child under the agreement. As can be enforced by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1520, paragraph one, Section 1566, paragraph two (6), and not the case where the dissenter was removed from power because the withdrawal of power. The court has jurisdiction and will be subject to section 1582, so that when death The parental authority of a minor child is the same as that of the unmarried parent under Section 1566, paragraph two. (1) It is not possible for a minor to have no parent or parent to be discharged. A petitioner is entitled to petition to be a minor guardian under Section 1585, paragraph one, with Section 1586, paragraph one.

Section 1521. If it appears that the user of parental or parental authority under Section 1520 is unreasonable Or later, the circumstances have changed. The court has the power to order the substitution of the user, parental authority, or guardian with regard to the well-being and benefit of the child.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4681/2552.

The person to submit a case to the civil court by filing an indictment or a request. Consider whether the case is a lawsuit with no capital or capital. At the request of the petitioner, in addition to the request to reduce the cost of raising children both minors. Also ask for an order to withdraw the authority of the Prime Minister and appoint a petitioner who uses the parental authority of both children. If the court orders the petitioner to use the parental authority, the petitioner does not need to pay child support for the minor children to the prescribed age. At the end of the divorce registration agreement. The court has the power to amend as the law provides that the request to withdraw the authority and appointment of new users of the power is the main request. The request to reduce foster care is a secondary request for a parental request. In spite of the final agreement, the divorce decree requires that the child be governed by both. If later it would have to change the use of authority, the court has the power to amend the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1521, Section 1566 (5), but the provisions do not determine how the case will come to court. The said provision would like to bring the case to the court by making a complaint as a dispute, and as a petition for a dispute without a dispute. This is to protect the rights and interests of minors. The petitioner would like to propose a lawsuit requesting the withdrawal of power and appoint a new governing power. A petition is filed, as well as the possibility of proposing a lawsuit requesting a reduction in the cost of raising two dependent children in the same application.

Although the final record of the divorce is done voluntarily by the parties. This is especially true of the childcare costs of these two children. If the circumstances of the party's income or status change. The court has the power to amend the matter under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1598/39, paragraph one and the circumstances of the income or status of the party is limited to the person sing. As can be seen from Section 1598/38, that the foster care may be provided by the court or not, taking into account the capacity of the person obliged to provide. The status of the petitioner and the circumstances of the case.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 448/2546.

The plaintiff sued for the revocation of child custody, which falls to the sole defendant in accordance with the divorce agreement, but according to the description of the lawsuit and the circumstances of the case, the plaintiff wishes to change. The administrator has agreed with the defendant that the plaintiff wishes to replace the user of the authority under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1520 and 1521.

The defendant did not behave inappropriately. Use the authority governed by the registration agreement, but it appears later that there are circumstances. It changes with regard to the well-being and the benefits of the child. The court deems it appropriate to change the power of the defendant to the plaintiff under Section 1520 and 1521.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8161/2543.

Provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1521, Section 1566 (5), which provides jurisdiction to protect the rights and interests of minor children in the change. The male ruler does not determine how the case will come to court. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Dispute and make a petition for a dispute. So when the petitioner, the father of the girl, cited in the request that the mother of the girls can not raise and educate the girls. As a career I would like to change the use of authority as a vocalist, as the military service can provide support for education and warmth to the girls, if true, it is considered that the circumstances change later. The court has the power to order the change of authority. The importance of the girls is not important. There is no law requiring the petitioner to exercise the right to court. Even though the petitioner filed the petition, the petitioner's request was considered by the petitioner.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1334/2534.

After the defendant divorced the plaintiff. The defendant brought the old wife and child from the old wife to live with. The defendant drank alcohol and returned home late at night. The plaintiff has not been married. After the plaintiff's separate defendant, the plaintiff took the child to care for the child alone, the child is warm and close to the plaintiff's mother. The plaintiff has never acted in the care of a minor child or behave inappropriately. Evil Taking into consideration the benefits and well-being of children, the minors will continue to receive in the future. Then the child in the plaintiff's jurisdiction will continue to be appropriate. To be in the defendant's domination.

Section 1522. If the spouse divorces by consent Make arrangements in the divorce agreement between husband and wife. What is the amount of child support paid by a husband or wife?

If divorced by a court judgment, or if the divorce agreement does not set a child support charge Let the court determine.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6244/2550.

Provisions under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1522 requires the court to determine the cost of child support is a case only when the court. If the defendant did not file a petition for divorce, or if the defendant did not file a divorce, The court ordered the plaintiff to pay child support for the two children on a monthly basis. Both of them will be able to get underage. The problem of childcare arrangements. There are no parties to raise a petition. It is a problem with peace. The Supreme Court deems it appropriate to raise the judgment for the benefit of the two minor children of the defendant plaintiff.

In the car lease dispute. The plaintiff's father made a deposit of 10,000 baht and the plaintiff's father issued a down payment for another part. The defendant, the plaintiff, the defendant has issued some money as a car. The money that the plaintiff's parents help out into the car. Later, it was not revealed that the plaintiff's parents have demanded that the plaintiff defend this debt, but how the plaintiff's parents intend to issue the car to the defendant. Such cars are the property that the plaintiff accused during the marriage. Sin Somros under Section 1474 (1) The right under the car lease agreement is a Sin Somros. The plaintiff's transfer of car lease to the defendant during the plaintiff is a husband. The defendant did not know about the transfer of the right to hire a car. Sin Somros is intended to cause the defendant to be harmed by Section 1534, as if the property is still available for distribution of Sin Somros under Section 1533, the plaintiff must share the Sin Somros to the defendant.

Although the defendant's two loans will be recovered after the defendant split up with. Father defendant But the defendant has brought up children. The cost of this part. The plaintiff is a father to take care of children as well. Defendant accused the defendant in the loan recovery in 2000, the defendant stated in the purpose of the loan. Buy a computer And proof of purchase order The borrower in 2003 was an emergency loan, hearing that the defendant twice borrowed money. This is a costly expense for the family and owes them money. The defendant formed during the marriage is the plaintiff to defend the defendant liability. Joint debtors under Section 1490

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6471/2548.

Section 1523. When a court adjudicates for divorce pursuant to Section 1516 (1), the wife or husband is entitled to compensation from the husband or wife and from those who have been fostered or raised. Or who is the cause of the divorce.

The husband will be compensated for the loss of his wife in the affair. And the wife will be compensated by another woman who is visibly present to show that she has a relationship with her husband in the affair.

If the husband or wife consents or consents, the other party shall take action under Section 1516 (1) or allow another person to act under paragraph two. The husband or wife will not be able to claim compensation.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1899/2559.

The plaintiff filed for divorce with the defendant and asked the defendant to pay compensation for the defendant in the first case under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, the second defendant, the defendant did not admit that the second. The second defendant rape the defendant, the plaintiff and the defendant that the two plan to destroy the reputation of the defendant during the Supreme Court 2. The plaintiff and the defendant made a compromise agreement that the plaintiff understand that the defendant is a good one that the defendant has no behavior in the affair with the second defendant and not an evil deed and will be living together husband and wife. I do not want to divorce. Compromise Agreement Legally enforceable And do not be against the image of the defendant's case. 2, the issue of divorce, so the judge is in accordance with the compromise agreement. And should be raised to the problem that the defendant is required to pay compensation under Section 1523, paragraph two to the plaintiff or not. The action in the affair must have two parties. When the woman is a defendant, there is no conduct in the affair with the defendant, then it appears that the defendant is not the second defendant in the affair with the defendant, the first defendant is not liable to pay compensation to the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 10851/2555.

Section 1523, paragraph two, the wife will claim compensation from other women who have a relationship with her husband in the affair, but only to the woman must be openly revealed that the relationship with her husband. In the melody When the plaintiff only suspected in the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant husband, such as the plaintiff's husband to guarantee the car lease debt to the defendant. Listening to other people that someone wants to call the husband of the plaintiff. When calling the defendant contacted the husband of the plaintiff. Or have the narrator say that the plaintiff husband to the defendant at home rent. But it does not appear. There are other witnesses who support it. Both the defendant and the plaintiff's husband stay alone in the suburban hotel. Even if it is a convincing behavior that the defendant may have a relationship with my husband, the plaintiff. But when the right to the plaintiff to claim compensation from the defendant. The defendant must show himself openly to show that he has a relationship with the husband of the plaintiff in the affair. However, such actions are illegal and attempt to cover up the act alone between the defendant and the plaintiff's husband. The plaintiff has no right to claim compensation from the defendant.

udgment of the Supreme Court 6516/2552.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6164/2552.

When the plaintiff is married to the defendant, the plaintiff is entitled to and is protected by law as a wife by law, the defendant has no right to foster or honor the second defendant, I will not be sponsored. Praised before or not, the defendant 2 when the defendant knew that the plaintiff is the wife of the defendant by the law, but also to support. Yong and watching my wife again is a violation of the plaintiff's rights. The plaintiff has the right to bring the case to the court to recover compensation from the defendant in accordance with Section 1523 of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, paragraph two can not be regarded as exercising rights in bad faith.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2498/2552.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8774/2550.

Section 350 states that "Whoever refuses to pay his or her creditors, or in whole or in part, The use or the right to claim the court to pay the debt, move it to hide or transfer to others, which property. To pretend to own a debt is not true. Imprisonment of up to two years. Or not more than four thousand baht. Or both of the adjustment. "From the provisions of the law is that it is seen. Creditors who have the power to prosecute criminal offenders cheating. Does not refer only to creditors under the judgment. In addition, the Commercial Code, Section 1523, paragraph two, states that "the husband will claim compensation from the person who has a wife. "... the debtors, the debtors between the plaintiff and the defendant occurred immediately after the defendant's wife with the plaintiff. Judgment of the court forcing compensation for compensation does not cause a debt between the plaintiff and the defendant. But the liability of the plaintiff and the defendant against each other. Case that the plaintiff is a creditor with power to sue the defendant. The action of the defendant therefore complete the fault of creditors under Section 350

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4818/2551.

The plaintiff sued the defendant by claiming that the defendant's relationship with K. in the way of affair and disclosed that the wife of the plaintiff's claim to compensation from the defendant under Section 1523 paragraph two. The provisions in section 5 are specific and affect the right and duty of the relationship between husband and wife. The lawsuit against family rights is not prohibited in the appeal under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, paragraph two of the Act on the establishment of juvenile and juvenile court and juvenile court proceedings. Section 6.

The plaintiff's complaint is that the plaintiff sued the other woman's disclosure to show that they have a relationship with the plaintiff's husband in the affair under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, paragraph two, which the law does not enforce. Must file a divorce before the right to sue for compensation, not to file a claim under Section 1523, which must be filed with divorce under Section 1516 (1). Therefore has the right to sue. The plaintiff sued.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4130/2548.

Section 1523 of the Civil and Commercial Code is a provision that gives the lawful wife the right to claim compensation from Other women who reveal themselves. To show that they have a relationship with the husband in the affair, without the condition that. The wife will have to be hurt or have to be wife to eat with her husband and Parenting There must be no divorce case. The plaintiff has the power to claim compensation from the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2544/2544.

Before filing divorce, the defendant brought two defendants to the evidence that the police found the defendant. The two live in a room and sleep together. And complaints of the boss of the second defendant, but later the plaintiff informed the investigating officer and recorded in the daily report on the case that the plaintiff did not take any notice of the defendant with the complaint is misleading. The plaintiff has to understand the two defendants and then understand each other well. It is reported as evidence by the defendant that the two defendants will not prosecute the plaintiff and the defendant with the plaintiff and the two defendants signed in the document. The daily report is a contract that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to settle the existing dispute. Or to be up about the two defendants to go with each other to complete. The parties agree to a waiver as a compromise agreement under the Code. Civil and Commercial Section 850 claim the compensation between the plaintiff and the defendant to the second. The plaintiff sued for compensation from the defendant is not the problem of power lawsuit against the public order. The Supreme Court ruled in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code, Section 142 (5), and Section 246,247

Section 1524. If the reason for the divorce under Section 1516 (3) (4) or (6) occurs because the responsible party has caused the other party to fail. The other party is entitled to compensation from the parties responsible.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4793/2533.

Defendant 1 kicked the plaintiff's foot injury to the sucking arm. It is a serious offense to file a divorce under the Code. Civil and Commercial Section 1516 (3) Defendant 1 parenting tribute praised my second wife continuously. The plaintiff just knew the action of the defendant. 1 address my husband and wife with the defendant before the lawsuit has not passed a year, the right to file a divorce is not suspended under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1529, the first paragraph, the plaintiff did not file for divorce, because the defendant can not bear the case. 1 Due to the assault of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (3), there is no right to claim compensation under Section 1524. Between the defendant and the plaintiff, the plaintiff engaged in a small trade to earn a living. And for the money between the plaintiff and the defendant 1 never involved. The plaintiff also helps out with the expense of home. Can not hear that the divorce gives the plaintiff a poor place in which to claim a pension. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1526 of the donation to the defendant was paid as compensation for the income of the defendant was acquired during the marriage when the defendant to buy land and buildings. Such land and buildings are Sin Somros. Divorce registration by judgment under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, paragraph two spouses do not need to show their intention to divorce registration to the registrar and the royal. The Family Law Enforcement Act, 1935, Section 16 stipulates that all interested parties should only keep a copy of the final judgment. The right to the Registrar. And ask the registrar to record the divorce only in the register. I do not need to order the defendant to register a divorce with the plaintiff as requested by the plaintiff.

Section 1525 of the compensation under Section 1523 and Section 1524 shall be prescribed by the court as the case may be. The court will order one payment or installment payment. There is a time limit that the court may deem appropriate.

In case the person has to pay the spouse's compensation to the other party. The court considers the amount of property the spouse receives from the divorce because of the divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2232/2535.

The defendant has a suspicion that the plaintiff's foster care for other women I was not satisfied. Always fight with the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is not home, then the defendant said to the plaintiff. "Let's have a go." Dead to get paid. If you do not die, keep raising yourself. And the plaintiff's parents do not give justice to the defendant. " I do not want to break up with you straight out of the border, if the limbs are not to take care of themselves. If the death is returned to receive money. "Such words are not blasphemous or disparaging the plaintiff or the plaintiff's parents, but the words of the defendant said in a sense that the plaintiff's foster care for other women and not a serious statement that will cause the plaintiff. Divorce The plaintiff fosters or raises other women, I wife and hostile. To be husband The defendant can not bear to eat with the plaintiff, so to separate it. It is not the case that the defendant deliberately abandoned the plaintiff, which will cause the plaintiff to divorce. But if the plaintiff cared for other women, I was a wife and opposed to. Be husband The defendant has the right to divorce. I do not know what to do. And act as an antagonist to husband and wife forever. The plaintiff's actions also have grounds to file for divorce at any time the action is not over. Even if the defendant knows the cause for more than a year, then the defendant is the cause of counterclaim. The defendant's claim is not terminated under Section 1529 of the wages of the wife is entitled to receive from the husband who carries the other woman I wife. Section 1525 requires the court to determine the circumstances. The teacher's wife is a person with a position of duty and honor in society. The lower court set the compensation for the wife of 100,000 baht, so it suits the case.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 320/2530.

The abduction of adultery under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, paragraph two, there is a meaning, including the affair. This entitlement does not require that the husband must first divorce. You will be able to claim compensation from the deceased wife in the affair and compensation in This is one of the damages that the male liable. The court has the power to impose on the sheriffs of those who have been damaged. Including damage to the reputation and honor of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff sued the defendant claim that the defendant sued. The deceased is the wife of the plaintiff. Defendant to fight one thing. The plaintiff is the wife of the plaintiff's wife. The issue that the plaintiff sued the defendant for the adulterer. The burden of proof on the defendant.

Section 1526. In the case of divorce, if the cause of the divorce is the fault of one of the spouses. And divorce will make the other party broke down. I do not have enough income from my property or work as I did during my marriage. The other party will ask the party to pay the cost of living. How can the court provide this? The provisions of Section 1598/39, Section 1598/40 and Section 1598/41 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Compensation claims are terminated. If not filed or filed in the divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 13552/2558.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8046/2056.

Section 1526 of the law states that "in a divorce case if the cause of divorce is the fault of one party but one party. And the divorce will make the other party poorer because of no income from the property or from work as it was during the marriage. The other party will ask the party to pay a contribution to ... "This case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant's divorce in several ways, including the insulting the plaintiff with insulting words. To give praise to other women I wife. Assault And non-foster care These are all divisions of the defendant's fault. In addition, the plaintiff sued to continue. First marriage with the defendant The plaintiffs received financial assistance because the former husband died from the US government 1,032.66 US dollars a month or about 36,000 Baht as a widow. Until the plaintiff died or married. When the plaintiff married with the defendant. The plaintiff's right to receive such money. And asked the defendant to pay child support and income from the defendant 50,000 baht per month from the date of filing. The plaintiff's commentary in this section shows that. The plaintiff did not receive the right to help from the United States government. And must be broke Even the plaintiff used the word. "Foster care," but the word "income deficiency" when considering the plaintiff's claim at the plaintiff's receipt of the plaintiff from the date of filing until the plaintiff died. It shows the intention of the plaintiff's wish to receive a pension. The right to a divorce. Plaintiff's petition and petition It is the right to pay. The composition as provided by Section 1526, paragraph one above, when the lower court both judge the plaintiff and the defendant divorced from each other because of the divorce of the defendant. And it appears that the plaintiff broke down. I like to pay the defendant to pay the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4532/2013.

The right to a pension is available when the marriage ends. The divorce by a judgment will result in the marriage ending from the time the verdict comes to the end of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, paragraph two.

udgment of the Supreme Court 4678/2552.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8739/2551.

Even if the contract between the spouses of the property is made between the husband and wife, there will be no agreement to prohibit the clearing or termination of the contract for a period of 20 years, but it is an agreement that violates the Civil and Commercial Code. Section 1469, which provides for the protection of the rights of spouses in general who have entered into a property contract during marriage, under the influence of affection or other cause. I have to lose. They are not being exploited or unfairly treated and prevent the family from breaking up. The agreement does not purge or terminate the contract relating to the property during the marriage. The purpose is to violate the law. Void under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 150, the defendant has the right to terminate the contract.

According to Section 1526, in a divorce case, if the cause of the divorce is the fault of one of the parties, but one party and divorce will cause the other party to be poor because they do not have enough income. Property or work done during the marriage. The other party will ask the party to pay the cost of living. The court may provide only a fee or not. The plaintiff must pay attention to the circumstances in which the plaintiff did not work, because after the marriage, the plaintiff's resignation from the clinic to help the defendant, a clinician, and the same with the revenue of the defendant in the market. The cost of living in the present together.

Settlement under Section 1526, the plaintiff has the right to claim from the date the judgment to divorce to the fullest.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 5664/2551.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1106/2550.

Although the complaint will be labeled. If the court decides the plaintiff to divorce the defendant. To force the plaintiff to pay the defendant and the cost of raising children, the child. But the defendant to fight the case and describe the first argument. Divorce is not due to the defendant's actions. The plaintiff is out of the house, abandoned, not care, not support, caring for the defendant, and the children of both children, who are in the course of study to force the plaintiff to pay the defendant. Child support for minors and the defendant is the sole user of the child. The true intent of the defendant was not to divorce the plaintiff. At the same time, it is confirmed that the plaintiff does not comply with Section 1564, paragraph one, that the parents must provide for the care and education of children during the minor. The plaintiff as the father is responsible for compliance with such provisions. Whether the defendant is still a husband or wife divorce or not. It is reasonable to have a court order to grant the minor children to the defendant is a single mother under Section 1566 (5) whether the plaintiff, the defendant is divorced or not the same. When the plaintiff does not support the education of children. The Court of Appeal 6, Department of Juvenile and Family Affairs Judge the plaintiff to pay child support for the minor children, and the defendant is the user of the child. It is not a judgment over the request.

Even the defendant gave and described the first argument. The plaintiff does not support the care of the defendant is like that. The plaintiff as a husband does not help take care of the defendant, the wife is not performing the duties of the husband as prescribed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1461, paragraph two, but when the defendant's first defendant to the end of the counterclaim. That's what I'm saying. The cause of the divorce is the fault of the plaintiff, a single husband. The plaintiff sued the defendant broke down. If the court decides the plaintiff to divorce the defendant. Forcing the plaintiff to pay the defendant a monthly payment. Which is in accordance with the rules of compensation Section 1526 provided only in the case of divorce. It will make the other spouse poor. The defendant can not count on the plaintiff to pay the defendant's parentage. When the two lower courts do not judge the defendant divorce the defendant. The plaintiff can not force the plaintiff to pay the survivor to the defendant at the end of the counterclaim.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3190/2549.

The consent and forgiveness of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1518 refers to the spouses who agree and forgive all facts about the cause of the divorce. However, the intent is to appear explicitly allowing or not to exercise the right to divorce.

The plaintiff is not known. And it is not expected that the defendant will be serious with the defendant because there are many other women until 2002, the plaintiff knew that the defendant with the son of a lawsuit was brought to court. The plaintiff did not file a divorce, but the first to know the relationship between the defendant and the defendant can not hold that the plaintiff has agreed or forgiven the defendant to support or support my wife. The defendant because of divorce.

Foster or honor another woman as a cause for divorce. As long as the defendant also cared for or raised my wife, divorce case under Section 1516 (1), it still exists. Even the plaintiff to know the circumstances of the defendant for more than a year, then the plaintiff is a cause for divorce. The plaintiff's lawsuit is not suspended under Section 1529.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3190/2549.

The consent and forgiveness of a divorce can not be filed under Section 1517, paragraph one, and Section 1518 refers to spouses who agree and forgive all facts about the cause of the right to sue. Divorce However, it is expressly stated that it is permissible to act or not to file a divorce. The fact that the plaintiff did not sue the defendant, but the first to know the relationship between the defendant and the defendant because the plaintiff is not clear. And it is not expected that the defendant will be serious with the MP, because at that time, the defendant also many other women. Until the plaintiff knows that the defendant with a son together with the lawsuit filed. The plaintiff's circumstances. I do not know whether the plaintiff has ever accepted or forgiven the defendant, foster care, or praise the wife of the plaintiff, I have the right to divorce for divorce.

Fostering or exhorting other women is a continuing cause of divorce. So long as the defendant also fosters or praises my wife, the cause of divorce under Section 1516 (1) is still present. Even the plaintiff to know the circumstances of the defendant for more than a year, then the plaintiff is a cause for divorce. The plaintiff's lawsuit is not suspended under Section 1529.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3596/2546.

Plaintiff's marriage to the defendant with two children, the second defendant to the first marriage to the second defendant and to eat openly, but not divorced with the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed for divorce by raising a child from the defendant and claim compensation from the two defendants. Even the plaintiff will know that the two defendants are married and have been eating together since 1993, but the two defendants are eating together until the filing date. The action of the two defendants violated the plaintiff to continue to stop the act, so it is not counted. Plaintiff's case does not terminate.

Although the plaintiff would have seen photos of the wedding ceremony of the two defendants and did not dispute the objection. But while celebrating the wedding ceremony of the two defendants. The plaintiff did not know the case is not enough to hear that the plaintiff has been conspicuously given to the two defendants are husband and wife under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1517, paragraph one, the plaintiff has the right to file a divorce.

The right of a minor to receive foster care from a parent is the right of each child to be accorded the capacity of the person who is responsible for The status of the recipient and the circumstances of the case. The Court of Appeal No. 1 requires that the custody of the two children is not valid. The amount of money to be paid for each child from the date of the judgment of the court of first instance. When the first child reaches the age of majority, the child will be provided with a monthly payment to the second child until he / she reaches the age of majority.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4685/2540.

Section 1526 of the Civil and Commercial Code It is only a provision that allows the court to determine the cost of living of a divorcing couple. When it turns out that the divorce is the fault of one spouse, but one party. And divorce will make the other party broke down. It is not compulsory to have a pension but only a divorce case. When the plaintiff, the defendant entered into a compromise agreement in a divorce case that the defendant duly registered the divorce and pay the plaintiff to pay 35 percent of the monthly salary forever. The agreement is to extend the foster care of the husband and wife after the marriage ends. It is a help. Section 1526, paragraph one, provides for the provisions of Section 1598/39, Section 1598/40 and Section 1598/41 on foster care to apply to. Compensation When it comes to Section 1598/39 of the first paragraph, then it is. When stakeholders show that the income or position of the parties has changed. The court will order a correction in respect of the survivors' compensation. Reduce or increase your pension. So, the defendant, who is the stakeholder. The right to file a petition to the Court of First Instance to show that the circumstances of the plaintiff's income or status change the defendant asked the court to withdraw the plaintiff's order to pay the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff. Despite the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 138 paragraph two prohibits the appeal of a judgment under a compromise. But this case is the defendant exercised the right to request the Court of First Instance to revoke the order that the defendant pay the plaintiff to pay under Section 1598/39 paragraph one and does not appeal the verdict in accordance with the compromise. The defendant's application is not in force to prohibit the appeal under Section 138 paragraph two of the plaintiff, the defendant entered into a compromise agreement. And the court sentenced the defendant to pay the plaintiff a 35 percent of the salary of the defendant, which is appropriate at the time. And the defendant paid the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff since the defendant made a compromise agreement. When the circumstances of the income or status of the plaintiff and the defendant changed. The defendant is in a state of economic inferior to the plaintiff. The court shall have the power to order the correction in respect of the survivors. The defendant owe no payment to the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4815/2539.

The plaintiff out of the house built and live with the defendant because he wants to take his father's heart disease away from his father, the defendant who drank alcohol and then sounded the plaintiff and the defendant had agreed to divorce but divorced. Because the plaintiff has no money to pay child custody to the defendant, the circumstances indicate that the plaintiff and the defendant. Because of the fact that I can not live together, my husband and I have always enjoyed happiness and separation for the time to the date of filing more than three years, then the plaintiff has the right to divorce the law. Civil and Commercial Section 1516 (4/2) that the defendant. The payment of a contribution must show that the reason for the divorce is the fault of the plaintiff, the only one is that the reason for the divorce is because the plaintiff and the defendant voluntarily separate because the husband can not live together. The wife is usually happy for more than three years, the defendant called on the plaintiff not pay.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1620/2538.

The plaintiff sued the two defendants have publicly disclosed that the relationship with the plaintiff's husband in the affair since 1975 until the date the plaintiff filed this case, the action of the defendant has continued. Non-stop plaintiff's case is not terminated under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1529, the plaintiff has the right to sue for compensation from the defendant No. 2 under the Civil and Commercial Code. Commerce Section 1523 shall be without regard to whether the plaintiff and the defendant at first agreed to divorce amicably or the court sentenced to divorce because under Section 1516 (1) As provided for in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, first paragraph or not.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1820/2537.

Divorce filed in addition to the cause of divorce under Section 1516, then there are cases under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1515, so if the divorce by consent. But one of the parties did not consent to divorce. Divorce by consent is not complete. The other party then sued the court for the divorce resulting from the husband's consent. According to the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 55, the plaintiff sued. Plaintiff's defendant made a record with the consent of both parties to divorce and divide property in front of two witnesses, the plaintiff informed the defendant to register the divorce, according to the memorandum. Defendant and the filing of the claim that the defendant filed a divorce with the plaintiff. If the defendant does not register to divorce, it is considered a judgment instead of the intent of the defendant. The Court of Appeal 2 removed the memorandum of understanding of the defendant to the defendant as evidence of divorce by consent. The plaintiff sued to force the defendant to register. And judge the defendant divorced from the husband and wife with the plaintiff. It is not a non-issue and does not conflict with the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 142 of the Memorandum of Understanding. In addition to the agreement between the defendant plaintiffs about the division of property and child care. There is a message. "The wives do not claim any rights other than what has been agreed. This is evidence of divorce, so the evidence is important ", which is a message to the divorce. When two signatures are signed by the consent of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1514 paragraph two, the right to sue under Section 1529 is the right to sue by virtue of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 ( 1) (2) (3) or (6) or Section 1523 is different from the application for divorce registration under Section 1514 of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1515, Must call within ten years Since the date of the divorce records.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6291/2537.

Defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1526, when divorced, and the divorce by the judgment, but the time of the verdict reached by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, paragraph two, the plaintiff is entitled to the value. I have been living since the date of the judgment.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6288/2537.

Defendant 1 to raise or honor the defendant 2 I wife and have a relationship in the affair. The plaintiff has the right to sue the defendant in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (1) when the divorce is the fault of the defendant, but the one and the divorce will make the plaintiff poor. The plaintiff has the right to claim a civil service under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1526 from the date of the final judgment. The divorce by judgment is effective, but the time of the verdict is finally reached under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, paragraph two.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2561/2536.

The plaintiff brought other women into the house and come to eat together, husband and wife have one child by the plaintiff to use the surname plaintiff. This circumstance holds that the plaintiff fosters or raises other women I, the defendant plaintiff sued the divorce. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (1) May 1977. Defendant bickering defendant bash. The defendant dismissed the plaintiff from the house. After that, the plaintiff also came to the defendant, and had been accused to eat together. In 1980, the plaintiff to the defendant came to the 3-4 months, the defendant was the father, the plaintiff fired from the house. Back to the original home. The plaintiff also came to the defendant by the money to use 4,000 baht per month in 1984. Plaintiffs claim that the plaintiff said that the ordained good and visit the defendant to send money to the defendant 4,000 baht per month just refrained from sending money from January. 1986, as follows: Although the plaintiff has a lawsuit to divorce the defendant. The circumstances that appear that the plaintiff forgave in the action of the defendant. The lawsuit of the plaintiff's divorce is gone. Civil and Commercial Code Section 1518. The reason for the divorce is the fault of the plaintiff, the only one who fosters and exalted my wife. Defendant does not have any occupation, the plaintiff has given the defendant a cost of 4,000 baht per month, so that the plaintiff defendant will make the defendant broke down. Defendant is entitled to a contribution from the plaintiff. Civil and Commercial Code Section 1526

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2232/2535.

Defendant has a suspicion that the plaintiff is dependent on other women, I am not satisfied and always quarrel with the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is not home, then the defendant said to the plaintiff. "Let's have a go." Dead to get paid. If you do not die, keep raising yourself. And the plaintiff's parents do not give justice to the defendant. " I do not want to break up with you straight out of the border, if the limbs are not to take care of themselves. If death is returned to receive money. "Such words are not defamatory or disparaging the plaintiff or the plaintiff's parents. It is a word that the defendant said with concern that the plaintiff is supporting other women. And not a serious one that will cause the plaintiff to divorce. The plaintiff fosters or exhorts other women, my wife, and is opposed to husband. The defendant can not bear to eat with the plaintiff, so to separate it. It is not the case that the defendant deliberately abandoned the plaintiff, which will cause the plaintiff to divorce. But if the plaintiff cared for other women, I was wife and opposed to husband. The defendant has the right to divorce. I do not know what to do. And act as an antagonist to husband and wife forever. The plaintiff's actions also have grounds to file for divorce at any time the action is not over. Even if the defendant knows the cause for more than a year, then the defendant is the cause of counterclaim. The defendant's claim is not terminated under Section 1529 of the wages of the wife is entitled to receive from the husband who carries the other woman I wife. Section 1525 requires the court to determine the circumstances. The teacher's wife is a person with a position of duty and honor in society. The lower court set the replacement fee for the wife of 100,000 baht, so it suits the case.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 981/2535.

The two defendants agree that the defendant is in the same house and have an open relationship with the defendant, it is common knowledge that the two have a relationship with the defendant, the second defendant admitted that the plaintiff had. Found the defendant's father 2, the defendant is not allowed to go to the defendant's home 2 listen to the defendant's second exposure by disclosing that they have a relationship with my liaison with the defendant. The first and the plaintiff is a husband and wife lawfully when the second defendant presented to the public that it has a relationship with the defendant. 1 In a melody, it is wrongly sanctioned and damaged to the plaintiff who is a wife. The plaintiff was shown to have a good social status. When such circumstances arise, the plaintiff's supervisor has a negative view on the plaintiff. Without regard to the smoothness of the plaintiff's marriage. And family well-being Which has already been compromised. The plaintiff is entitled to compensation from the second defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1523, paragraph two compensation amount. The court has the power to determine the amount of compensation for the circumstances and status of the spouses. The plaintiff was aware of the relationship between the defendants in the middle of the year. But the complaint and the evidence of the plaintiff's evidence confirmed the relationship of the two defendants continued throughout 1985 to not stop and stop. When the plaintiff sued for compensation within the year. 1985. The plaintiff's case is not terminated under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1529.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 454/2533.

The indictment states that the second defendant was liable to the defendant, who was the plaintiff's wife. The adultery is the right of the plaintiff. It is a violation of the plaintiff's rights. The plaintiff damaged the reputation. And ask the second defendant to use the replacement fee that is clear both the state of the charge and the request. The plaintiff did not cover. The plaintiff claims that the plaintiff traveled the last time on November 17, 2526, and the plaintiff was aware of the defendant's adultery in early April 2527, the defendant did not dispute that the plaintiff learned from November 17, 1983 to hear that the plaintiff. In April 1984, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit on December 13, 2527 has not passed a year, the plaintiff's right to sue will not be suspended. Each mass and commercial law, Article 1529, paragraph one.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4793/2533.

Defendant 1 uses the kick to the injured plaintiff to the broken arm bone. The assault on the seriousness of the cause of divorce under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (3) Defendant 1, caring for the defendant, the second wife continuously. The plaintiff just knew the action of the defendant. 1 address my husband and wife with the defendant before the lawsuit has not passed a year, the right to file a divorce is not suspended under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1529, the first paragraph, the plaintiff did not file for divorce, because the defendant can not bear the case. 1 Due to the assault of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (3), there is no right to claim compensation under Section 1524. Between the defendant and the plaintiff, the plaintiff engaged in a small trade to earn a living. And for the money between the plaintiff and the defendant 1 never involved. The plaintiff also helps out with the expense of home. Can not hear that the divorce plaintiff broke into the right to be entitled to a pension under Section 1526 of the Civil and Commercial Code, the donation to the defendant 1 is paid to receive the money to be paid to the defendant. During the marriage when the defendant to buy land and buildings. Such land and buildings are Marital Property. Divorce registration under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, paragraph two, spouses do not need to show their intention to divorce registration with the registrar, and also under the Family Registration Act, Section 2478, only the stakeholders. The copy of the most recent verdict confirmed to the Registrar. And ask the registrar to record the divorce only in the register. I do not need to order the defendant to register a divorce with the plaintiff as requested by the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1106/2550.

Even the defendant gave and described the first argument. The plaintiff does not support the care of the defendant is like that. The plaintiff as a husband does not help take care of the defendant, the wife is not. The duties of the husband as stated in Section 1461, paragraph two, but when the defendant's first reading of the complaint until the end of the counterclaim, and then all the heart as described. The cause of the divorce is the fault of the plaintiff, a single husband. The plaintiff sued the defendant broke down. If the court decides the plaintiff to divorce the defendant. Forcing the plaintiff to pay the defendant a monthly payment. Which is in accordance with the rules of compensation Section 1526 provided only in the case of divorce. It will make the other spouse poor. The defendant can not count on the plaintiff to pay the defendant's parentage. When the two lower courts do not judge the defendant divorce the defendant. The plaintiff can not force the plaintiff to pay the survivor to the defendant at the end of the lawsuit.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4685/2540.

Section 1526 of the Civil and Commercial Code It is only a provision that allows the court to determine the amount of the payment to the divorcing couple in one case where it appears that the divorce is the fault of one of the spouses. And divorce will make the other party broke down. It is not compulsory to pay a pension, but only a divorce case, so when the plaintiff, the defendant entered into a compromise agreement in the case that the defendant denied. The divorce of the plaintiff and pay the plaintiff to pay 35 percent of the monthly salary forever. The agreement is to extend the foster care of the husband and wife. After marriage ends It is a help. Section 1526, paragraph one, provides for the provisions of Section 1598/39, Section 1598/40 and Section 1598/41 on foster care to apply to. Compensation When it comes to Section 1598/39 of the first paragraph, then it is. When stakeholders show that the income or status of the parties has changed, the court will order the correction in respect of the survivors' compensation. Reduce or increase your pension. So, the defendant, who is the stakeholder. The right to file a petition to the Court of First Instance to show that the income or status of the situation. The plaintiff changed the defendant to the Court of First Instance to withdraw the order to pay the defendant. Living for the plaintiff. Despite the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 138 paragraph two prohibits the appeal of a judgment under a compromise. But this case is a case where the defendant exercised the right to file a petition to the Court of First Instance to revoke the order. The defendant paid the plaintiff's pay under Section 1598/39 paragraph one and does not appeal the verdict of the compromise. The defendant's application is not in force to prohibit the appeal under Section 138 paragraph two of the plaintiff, the defendant entered into a compromise agreement. And the court sentenced the defendant to pay the plaintiff a 35 percent of the salary of the defendant, which is appropriate at the time. And the defendant paid the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff since the defendant made a compromise agreement. All the time When the circumstances of the income or status of the plaintiff and the defendant changed. The defendant is in a state of economic inferior to the plaintiff. The court shall have the power to order the correction in respect of the survivors. The defendant owe no payment to the plaintiff.

Section 1527. If the divorce is due to a misconduct under section 1516 (7) or because of a serious communicable disease under section 1516 (9), the other spouse must pay the insolvent party or party. The contingency fee is calculated according to Section 1526.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2414/2519.

Father of children only to be registered as a child under the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1527 when the child is registered, then the child will be withdrawn under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, and when the registration of such a child will be filed to withdraw. Register with Because the applicant is not the father under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1528 only.

Defendant gave the plaintiff 20,000 baht as compensation to the plaintiff in the plaintiff's consent to withdraw the registration. The fact that the defendant is not the real father of the child. The compromise agreement and the verdict of the court are contrary to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1528, which is a law of public order.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1144/2507.

The plaintiff married with the defendant after the Civil and Commercial Code, 5 without the legal marriage. During the birth of one child, the defendant informed the local registrar. The child is the child of the defendant and the name of another person as the father of the child, the plaintiff's husband will sue the defendant. That dares to lie In order to be punished by the Criminal Code, Section 137 can not be because the plaintiff is not in the position as a legal injured. There is no power to prosecute.

Section 1528. If the party receives a new marriage Allowances are forfeited.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6288/2537.

Defendant 1 to raise or honor the defendant 2 I wife and have a relationship in the affair. The plaintiff has the right to sue the defendant in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1516 (1) when the divorce is the fault of the defendant, but the one and the divorce will make the plaintiff poor. The plaintiff has the right to claim a civil service under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1526 from the date of the final judgment. The divorce by judgment is effective, but the time when the verdict is finally reached. Civil and Commercial Section 1531, paragraph two.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 46/2501.

Person to register The child must be the father of the child, otherwise the certification will not be effective.

Section 1529. The right to sue under section 1516 (1) (2) (3) or (6) or Section 1523 shall be suspended upon the expiration of one year from the date the claimant knows or should have known. Actually, you may raise the claim.

I can not raise a divorce. It may help to file a divorce case.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3190/2549.

Section 1530 while divorce proceedings are pending. If any party requests. The court may order temporary arrangements to be made, such as in the case of sins, residence, foster care, husband and wife, and guardianship of foster care.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1230/2522.

The plaintiff is eating with the defendant, husband and wife without registration and have children together. The plaintiff, a mother, has the power to sue for child support. In the same case that the defendant has the child. You do not have to sue for your child to have a final judgment.

Foster care for minors The plaintiff has the right to claim from the date of the verdict that the child is the last child. Alimony paid to the plaintiff since the defendant abandoned the plaintiff until the date of filing. It's not enforced.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1998/2519.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to accept the child and collect the foster care included. It is related. Plaintiff sued in the same case. No need to ask the court to judge the child. Then came the charge of raising foster care later. (Citing the Supreme Court ruling 2085/2499)

Plaintiff sued foster care. The defendant, as the plaintiff, is a mother and a power user. Do not sue on behalf of a minor or as a minor. Not a surefire case.

The plaintiff sued. Defendant incites the plaintiff to the child until the birth of a child when the plaintiff is a child, then the defendant has shown that the child is the child of the defendant as follows: Although the plaintiff does not have the documents of the defendant clearly show that the child is the defendant's son. Process Civil and Commercial Section 1529 (3), the plaintiff sued. Because the plaintiff has described that when the plaintiff's child, the defendant has shown. Generally, the child is the child of the defendant. This is one reason to apply for certification of children already under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1529 (5)

The payment of child support must be commenced by the date of the verdict of the child.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1873/2517.

The plaintiff sued the plaintiff as four children. C. Father approved by c. To live and live in the same house. To support and educate c. Disappearance of the dispute as the plaintiff as a successor. Defendant is a defendant. The four plaintiffs are not his legal descendants on the date of appointment. The agreement was challenged on the same issue. If the court ruled that the plaintiff is a lawful child of the plaintiff, the plaintiff surrendered the case as follows: when the plaintiff's assertion that only four plaintiffs are illegitimate child c. The four plaintiffs are not children by the law of the plaintiff, so the case must be challenged. Because of the plaintiff's case. If the four plaintiffs are the children of the law of c. The plaintiff must file a plaintiff to be the children under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1529, and it must be pledged that the plaintiffs are four children. According to Section 1530 (3), before the provisions of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1524 is a proof of how the child was born during the marriage law. The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1627 that the illegitimate child that the father has guaranteed. To be considered as a descendant as the lawful son. It is not considered a legitimate child. But only the inheritance of the male born.

Section 1531 of the statutory marriage Divorce by consent of both spouses is effective from the date of divorce registration.

Divorce by judgment takes effect, but the time when judgment is finally reached. This is not the case. Unless a divorce is registered.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2164/2538.

Divorce and divorce are exclusive. When the plaintiff died before the lawsuit finally due to reconsideration. As a result, the marriage ends before the divorce decree and the divorce is finally reached. It is not useful to continue the trial. The court has ordered the disposal of the case from the directory.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1330/2538.

The Court of First Instance considers the plaintiff's case to be unilateral, since the defendant has failed to file an appointment and is absent. Judgment of the plaintiff to the defendant divorced from each other without sending the regulations. The defendant, but the plaintiff brought the judgment to the registrar, the record of divorce in the marriage register. Enforcement of the judgment by other means, then the defendant filed an internal reconsideration request. 6 months from the date of enforcement of the judgment under the Code. Civil Procedure Code Section 208 When the Court of First Instance allowed the reconsideration of the verdict by the couple, the absence of the court's appointment. The first class and the way to enforce the case is considered to be retracted. According to the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 209, first paragraph, the plaintiff to the master. The record of divorce in the marriage certificate was withdrawn by the state. The defendant's plaintiff remains unchanged from the husband.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6291/2537.

Defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1526, when divorced, and divorce by judgment, but the time the judgment reached. Under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1531, paragraph two, the plaintiff is entitled to a pension from the date of the final judgment.

Section 1532, when divorced, to divide the property of the husband.

But in between husband and wife.

(A) if the divorce is by consent of both parties; To divide the husband's property as it is at the time of divorce registration.

(B) if divorced by a court judgment Judgment of enforcement of property between husband and wife. Effective date back to the date of divorce.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6388/2550.

Memorandum of Agreement at the end of divorce registration is a division of property under Section 1532 when the registrar of divorce. I have already divided the property. Since the date of the divorce record, divorce records The land and buildings are real estate, so it was the right of the government since that time. Non- Marital Property between the plaintiff and the plaintiff to the plaintiff to separate it.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 5496/2549.

Plaintiff defendant divorce registered and made a record at the end of divorce registration. All assets are available in Chonburi and Chachoengsao. To be the plaintiff. Other liabilities to financial institutions in the two provinces that occurred before the divorce. The plaintiff agreed to pay all debts. Although the agreement is the property of husband and wife under Section 1532, but the defendant must register the transfer of property to the plaintiff. And the plaintiff must pay the debt instead of the defendant. It can be said that the plaintiff has a duty to treat each other. It is a reciprocal contract. When not specified. Defendant must transfer property to the plaintiff. Plaintiff to the defendant must comply with the agreement. The plaintiff has not paid or to repay the debt. Defendant is not entitled to transfer the property to the plaintiff under Section 369, the plaintiff will raise a single agreement to the benefit of one party to enforce the defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1362/2548.

Court of First Instance sentenced the plaintiff to split the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant. The defendant half. However, the plaintiff and the defendant can not share each other and can not bid for a friendly price, so the plaintiff asked the court of first instance to order the defendant to seize the house dispute. The auction for the money is divided into a request to the Court of First Instance. Division of Marital Property. Section 1532, 1533, the plaintiff and the defendant is not a creditor or debtor. Although the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the Court of First Instance, the defendant's request was lifted. Revocation of the enforcement process is not possible. If not in the Civil Code Section 309 bis

Section 1533. When divorced, divorce shall be divided equally between men and women.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8452/2551.

Singer and defendant 1 registered to transfer land and house disputes from the seller during the marriage. Land and house disputes are the property that the applicant and the defendant acquired during the marriage. The sins of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1474 (1)

The petition of the petitioner. The petitioner and the defendant filed for divorce on January 14, 1997. There was a split in the property at the time of the divorce. The land and house disputes fall, the petitioner is the fact that the petitioner said. Quote from: Not that it was raised in the lower court, both are prohibited by the Supreme Court in the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 249 paragraph one.

Section 1533 states that "when divorced, divorce shall be divided equally male and female." When the fact that the petitioner does not appear that the petitioner and the defendant divide the land and the disputed property. The case must be enforced according to the provisions on the ownership of the land and the dispute is the property that the applicant and the defendant jointly owned. Yes, the property of the petitioner alone, the petitioner is not entitled to request. Release of property disputes under Civil Code Section 288

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2149/2547.

Plaintiff accused the land dispute during the marriage. Dispute land is the property between the defendant plaintiff. Even later, the defendant plaintiff will be separated or divorced in Islam. It is considered that the plaintiff's defendant is absent from being a husband by law. The case did not occur in Pattani, Narathiwat, Yala and Satun. The Act on the Use of Islamic Law in Pattani, Narathiwat, Yala and Satun, BE 2489, was not applied. The relationship between husband and wife in property matters must be governed by the Code. Civil and Commercial Section 1533 when the plaintiff's defendant has the status of a husband and wife law. The defendant sued the debt.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3786/2546.

At the end of the defendant's counterclaim. The defendant divided half of Marital Property. When the Volvo car is a Marital Property and the defendant divorce, then like to divide. Married to the plaintiff and defendant have equal. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1533, if the division can not agree, then the Marital Property to sell the money to sell. Divided by section If you can not share a sinus car, then the plaintiff used to return the rent. Half paid

Section 1534 Marital Property married to one party for the sake of one. Distributed by intention to damage the other spouse. Dispute without the consent of the other spouse if the law. To force the sale must be the consent of the other party. Willfully destroyed to lose. Assume that the property is still available to divide the Sin Someday under Section 1533 and if the other spouse has not received the share of the Marital Property. The spouse who sells or deliberately destroys the property shall be liable for damages from the Marital Property. Or personal property

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4650/2545.

Section 1532 of the Civil and Commercial Code requires the divorce between husband and wife. Divorce by mutual consent or divorce by a court judgment. When the plaintiff sued the defendant, and divided the sins between the plaintiff and the defendant, then the defendant would have the right to file a lawsuit between the plaintiff and the defendant. Even the Marital Property, the defendant will be the surname other than the plaintiff stated in the indictment. The problem of divorce shall cease with the termination of marriage.

Plaintiffs argued that they could not live together and were separated from January 9, 1993 until the date of the divorce, but the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant ended. Marital Property between the plaintiff and the defendant is still at all times and the defendant has the power to handle. Married to a single currency without the consent of the plaintiff. If the defendant spent the money for the sake of their own interests alone. The plaintiff must request the defendant to reimburse. The point is to make redemption of the missing property, specifically, according to the Code. Civil and Commercial Section 1534 so that the Court of Appeal ruled that the amount of Marital Property in the deposit account as a basis for thinking. Calculate the share to hold the existing on the date the lawsuit was filed.

Income from beauty salon 1,000,000 baht. The plaintiff is not liable personally to be refunded to the defendant. However, it must be returned to the defendant when the loan is returned from the borrower. Defendant does not appeal The problem of this money is terminated according to the Court of First Instance. The Court of Appeal brought $ 1,000,000 to calculate the offset of the debt to the plaintiff divided half of the defendant. I do not like it, but it is not about the way to enforce marriages. It is not a legal problem with the public order. The Appeal Court has no authority to raise its own judgment. Prohibited under the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 246, Section 142 shall be deemed to be income from the salon. It is not possible to calculate the share of the Marital Property because it has not been repaid from the borrower.

$ 100,000 of the defendant when combined with the plaintiff's money to buy land and houses. It is a land and a house that is purchased, so there is no money to be returned to the defendant or the plaintiff.

The plaintiff and the defendant jointly operated a beauty salon before the marriage. The salon business is a property that the plaintiff and the defendant already. Marriage is a private property of the plaintiff and the defendant under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1471 (1) The plaintiff's investment in the business 200,000 baht, the defendant invested 100,000 baht salon business. It is the private property of the plaintiff and the defendant in proportion to the investment is 2 to 1.

The four apartments and the defendant's apartment were transferred after the plaintiff's defendant registered the marriage, and the down payment of the land and apartments of the defendant to pay. Defendants withdraw money from bank accounts. The private property of the defendant. But the money in the account of the income from the salon business included. The income is a Marital Property between the plaintiff and the defendant can not separate that. Which is the private money of the defendant. Where is the money? As such, it can not be heard that the private money of the defendant mixed up. What is the down payment of the land and the four suites? Therefore, it must be assumed in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1471. The bottom line is that the down payment is Marital Property with four land and apartments. This is the full number of sins that must be distributed to the plaintiffs in half.

Bank deposit accounts include income from salon business. We can not distinguish how much money each part, so we have to assume the assumption. According to the law, the money in this account is a sinister, so when the defendant withdraws money in the account to open a fixed deposit account. The deposit in this new account is a Marital Property to split the defendant half the defendant. Same as

The court ruled that the deposits in both accounts are still available. Only one account in the amount of 211,562.61 US dollars, which must be divided into half. The plaintiff appealed that the money in the account has been withdrawn after some days to sue. Installment Payment Land, cars and condominiums The account is only 39,169.08 baht, the defendant did not argue. The money that was withdrawn was used incorrectly when the deposit in the account. The marriage and the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant has not ended. The plaintiff is still entitled to manage the Marital Property in the currency alone. The consent of the defendant by the withdrawal from the bank even after the lawsuit, so it must hold the amount of money, as the plaintiff and the defendant admitted without. Disagreement will go back to the amount of money actually existed.

Section 1535 When Marriage Ends To divide the liability of the debt to be equally liable for each other.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2980/2533.

The defendant drunkenly returned to the house and scolded the plaintiff that "Unhappy bad guy you do not fit with me, you do not have good teaching", then the defendant also slapped. The plaintiff suffered a left eye injury. The plaintiff must be treated by the doctor the next day. The plaintiff must leave home to live with his sister because of the rage of the. I eat with the defendant. The action of the defendant is a defamation of the plaintiff and the plaintiff and the plaintiff as a serious plagiarism. Therefore, the plaintiff divorced from the defendant. The defendant borrowed money from outsiders to spend on land and home, which is Marital Property. The plaintiff is aware of the loan, the plaintiff must together with the defendant to pay the debt, so the court sentenced the plaintiff to divorce the defendant. The court will require the plaintiff to jointly pay the debt in half this.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1943/2520.

The plaintiff described that. The bus company of the defendant's car hit the son of the plaintiff knife as a driver until the date of the plaintiff's testimony, which after the appointment date. Plaintiff sued the plaintiff. The driver of the company's defendant's name. There are two cars at the same time. When the defendant did not deny that. Not a defendant employee I just claim that the driver of the defendant is not negligent. The plaintiff's driver's name, the defendant's fault with the reason. Then corrected to correct a minor error. Even after the time prescribed by the Civil Procedure Code Section 180, the court has the power to allow the plaintiff to correct it.

The son of the plaintiff died of abuse. The plaintiff desires to receive a lack of support, both now and in the future. The result of the law as provided in Section 443, paragraph 3 contains Section 1535 of the Civil and Commercial Code. No need to consider whether the death of the plaintiff's real sponsor. And in the future, the dead. Will you sponsor the plaintiff?

(Cited in Supreme Court ruling 1648/2509)

Posted in:

Thai Civil and Commercial Code

Divorce

About Me

Popular Posts

Total Pageviews

Blog Archive