Section 564 lease. That would be extinguished at the end of the period agreed. In a notice at first.
Section 565 of the rental section. You may be presumed that for each year.
Rent in his rented presumed to Napi's season one.
Section 566 is scheduled to appear in the rental agreement or not they believed the gem. That party may terminate the lease at the time when the rent is due every time. I need to give notice to the other party to pay the rent for a short period of time, but must be at least two months notice.
Section 567 if the rental property lost gem. He said it would hold a lease.
Section 568 if the property is rented and not lost, but only in part be due to the fault of the tenant. He said the tenants are known to reduce the rent by the lost time.
In such a case. If tenants are unable to implement the remaining assets of the success of the mission as soon entered into the contract. That the lessee will lose his contract.
Section 569 of the leased property shall not be extinguished because of transfer of property for rent.
Transferee to accept the rights and obligations of the transferor and the tenants as well.
Section 570 of the end of the period of lease has been agreed that, if the tenant continues to occupy the property. And the lessor, then they are not upset gem. The parties shall be deemed to have entered into the next without time limit.
Section 571, if the lease is not terminated or suspended in it. The tenants have been cultivating rice gem. That the lessee shall have the right to rule over them until the finish on. I have to pay the rent.
Supreme Court in 6458/2551.
The plaintiff is a minor, a 17 year old son was lawfully on the pass. plaintiff sued the owner of the disputed land by inheritance from the past. The defendant had a land dispute, despite the contract with this This is the law of the wife. but after the lease contract. death, then this is the case with the owner of the land. And there is no law that will require the lessor is the owner of the leased property when the plaintiff is required to transfer the disputed land and the rights and duties under Section 569 plaintiffs have sued the authority.
According to Section 1402 stipulates that "any person entitled to live in the house, that person shall be entitled to stay in the house. Without paying the rent, "we see that the residents have only the right to live in the house of another person only. When listening to the fact that such a defendant's own home. The plaintiff sued the defendant and the family drove to demolish the building in the land of the plaintiff disputes the defendant has no right to live in a land dispute further on notice to plaintiff. Defendant out of the land dispute, but the defendant ignored the plaintiff's action against it. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 6179/2551.
The plaintiff is entitled to lease state's Division of the Department of Treasury, Ministry of Finance. Building, commercial building, No. 231 the plaintiff sued to expel the defendant from the property valuable for the filing month, 2,000 a plaintiff may claim damages from the date of termination of the contract month, 10,000 are reimbursed as part of a lawsuit against the driver. chase. It must appeal to the facts Civil Code Procedure Section 224 paragraph one and paragraph two. The defendant appealed that The plaintiff did not intend to sublease the leasehold. An appeal on the issue of facts to lead to legislation that Sublease agreement is a legal right to secretly transfer the lease or not. The defendant appealed on this point by the judges who sit in the trial court did not. That there are reasonable grounds to appeal the violation of the provisions of that law.
The sub-floor building, the agreement is a contract that the duration of the contract must comply with Section 566 of the sublease agreement is the agreement to pay 2,000 baht a month's rent. the payment of rent, of course. It takes a month to pay rent under the Section 559 plaintiff and the defendant in writing to terminate the sublease agreement was received on August 4, 2537 plaintiff filed a lawsuit on March 21, 2538 termination. sublease was like then.
Supreme Court in 4207/2551.
When the lease is terminated and the lessor to terminate the contract. Tenants must get out of the lease. When the lease is terminated, then the tenant is not out of the lease. The lessor from the lessee the right to sue in court because the action. Dispute the lessor's rights under Section 55 Civil Code Procedure lessor to evict a tenant from the lease shall be made by the court. The court is mandatory. The lessor has the right to break into locked doors is prohibited. President of the tenants inside the building so that the two defendants entered the premises of the plaintiff and then shut the door lock is prohibited. The managing director of the building, it is a violation of the plaintiff under Section 420.
Supreme Court in 5491/2550.
The defendant requested the testimony of the four defendants are.
1) with respect to authorize the prosecution of the former. The plaintiff's attorney's signature is forged signature. The seal is not critical of the plaintiff's registered trademark.
2) with respect to property disputes that claim and the defendant is entitled to a reciprocal agreement. Live life to it. The plaintiff had no title to the land and building rent.
3) Article about the termination and notice to the plaintiff's claim that it's not like it. The law is that After the lease ended. The defendant remains in possession of the leased premises by the plaintiff did not have any objection to the lease at the time of termination of the lease must be subject to the provisions of Section 566 before the plaintiff sued to terminate the contract, and books. written notice of termination of the plaintiff but the plaintiff has no power to sue and
4) The plaintiff sued on the grounds that it is Recondite. The plaintiff sued without narrative describing how the defendant came into the house on the land. Dispute is located in alleys. Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against dark All the facts and the cause of the decline in new defense transformation. The original defendants in the first place. As well as the District Court to issue an order allowing the defendant's request to modify the defendant may file a request before the hearing date. It is not correct minor errors or amendments in respect. The public order. If not why, except that the defendant may request a hearing after the defendant filed a petition P.wi.p. Section 180 of the notice of the hearing date, so it is. Violation of such provisions in the defendant's petition in verse 3) and 4) to raise a defense request that the court modify the order. Allow the defendant to the claim in court. It is not raised in the petition that was lawfully in the District Court. The Court of Appeal ruled that the defendant and the plaintiff later. It is not raised in the petition that was lawfully in the District Court and the Court. The appeal did not like the Civil Code Procedure Section 249.
Supreme Court in 4260/2550.
Land formerly owned by the trustee of T. T. The Bank has entered into a lease for a period of 20 years at Bank of tenement buildings on the land. It is combined with the land under Section 146 the plaintiff bought the land from the trustee of T. During the term of the lease. The plaintiff is the owner of commercial building But at the end of the lease the land bank would be entitled to the land required to demolish the commercial building commercial building unless the Bank agrees to become the plaintiff. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff when the defendant has authorized the Town. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff, but the bank that owns the tenement house law has no power to limit the duration of the lease. When the lease expired. The duration of the dispute over the rent that would not fall to the plaintiff under section 569 on the plaintiff does not dispute that the defendant is in the room anymore. But she did not go out. The action against the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 5387/2549.
The defendant has made a commercial building lease dispute with the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have the rights and obligations as lessor under the contract and the defendant must be bound by the contract made with the plaintiff. When the defendant fails to pay the rent, the plaintiff's breach of contract and terminate the contract. Therefore, the plaintiff filed this lawsuit. The problem is that the plaintiff is the owner of rental property are not material to the case. And lease the building, the rental rate of 17,000 per month for a year when they come due in Town Court on the defendant to remain under Section 570, the plaintiff, the defendant shall be deemed to have made a new contract. schedule, which means that the agreement becomes effective the next time. The other contract is to lease it. The rate of rent. And by virtue of Section 538, this Lease shall be evidenced in writing signed by either party shall be liable as a priority. Otherwise, legal action is not. Thus, when the plaintiff is forced to ask the defendant to pay the rent. The rental rate is higher than that stipulated in the lease contract. The plaintiff must have evidence in writing of any defendant to show that it has signed an agreement to lease the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff introduced evidence that the parties have agreed to increase the rent at 20,000 Baht per month, it is prohibited by Section 94 Civil Code Procedure defendant would be liable to pay the rent owed by the rate of 17,000 per month. rent in the lease.
Supreme Court in 5142/2549.
Defendant to the plaintiff for a period of one year lease with rent paid in advance by the 19th day of each month at the end of rental period, then the plaintiff paid the rent paid in advance. Defendant on November 19, 2543 before the plaintiff would have to terminate the lease to the defendant on November 21, 2543 held that the plaintiff and the defendant has entered a new lease for an indefinite period under the Section. 570 objection to the defendant after the lease was due to 3 days may indicate that the plaintiff intends to lease to the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff terminated the lease and the provisions of Section 566 on the termination of the lease of the plaintiff, not the plaintiff has no power to sue.
Supreme Court in 3822/2548.
The original contract between plaintiff and defendant to settle because the end of the morning and no conditions or obligations that the defendant is required to lease to the plaintiff. The defendant is the government refusing to renew leases to the plaintiff and the defendant have a right of ownership under the law. The defendant notified the plaintiff that does not want to lease land to the plaintiff. Administrative order is not to ask the court to revoke it.
Supreme Court in 1602/2548.
Subject matter of the plaintiff is the owner by inheritance of grade I entered a commercial building leased to the defendant disputes. The 15-year lease with a lease agreement, Article 11 states that at the end of the lease and the lessor will lease every three years under the agreement. It is a commitment that will allow tenants to renew for next time. It does not cause the contract. But this promise is not binding because it's not that I had to meet before I died when she learned that I proposed to death on July 5, 2537 before the expiry of the lease. Date December 31, 2538 case must be governed by Section 360, which stipulates that prohibits the provisions of Section 169 shall not apply to such a commitment I will not become effective and not as a legacy. The plaintiff, an heir is bound to comply with the provisions of Section 1599 and Section 1600 of the defendant's request for renewal has no effect. And does not cause a new lease. The plaintiff sued to terminate the lease and evict the defendant and family disputes out of the building.
Supreme Court in 1035/2547.
The 3-year lease agreement will terminate at the end of the period. Without prior notice. To combat that, due to the defendant rented. The defendant remains in the land lease and pay rent to the plaintiff. I accept the plaintiff without objection. The plaintiff, the defendant has entered a new period without it. This means that the agreement on the term are not effective in the next section. The other terms as the original agreement, including the rent. If the lease is true that the defendant had no reason to pay higher rental rates as specified in the lease contract. And serve as proof of the defendant to pay the rent, there is no weight to the hearing and the evidence does not refute the plaintiff. So I do not think the plaintiff had a new lease. The defendant must be immediately removed from the leased land at the end of the period. The plaintiff need not have terminated the contract with the defendant before the Court.
Supreme Court in 5866/2545.
Lease between the landlord and the tenant is a contract or a lease agreement, reciprocal worse than normal. It is a matter between the parties. Not a problem with public order.
Supreme Court in 3819/2545.
While the transfer of land between the plaintiff and the vendor land. Land is under lease. The land sale was registered with the Bank for a period of 20 years and has become the owner of the land and buildings when the lease expired at the end of the lease term so as not registered. Building in the land of the plaintiff was vested with the transferee bank shall be entitled to lease the commercial building and a room in a tenement building has been sublet to any person. Defendants have no right to sublease to a tenant rather than the original. May not raise the rent between the Bank and the defendant is a defense to the plaintiff, the owner of the property in dispute. The defendant remains in dispute later. It is a violation of the plaintiff. Plaintiffs have filed the eviction notice to the defendant without the defendant and the attendant out of the dispute.
Supreme Court in 3254/2545.
Her husband, plaintiff entered into a land lease from the defendant. The lease is due for a husband had died. Even if the defendant allowed the plaintiff and the plaintiff's husband in the land that was leased after the expiry of the period of lease. It is regarded as a new land to lease for an indefinite time period. But it is the plaintiff in the land lease by the lease of the plaintiff's husband, who is a party. If the defendant's misconduct, the contract would have liked to plaintiff's husband, a tenant must admonish the defendant as a successor trustee of her husband and the defendant's lessor. When her husband, the plaintiff sued the defendant until the plaintiff's husband died. Lease would be extinguished. The plaintiff, the wife of the lessee does not have to wear the right to lease the plaintiff's husband, who died at legal action against the defendant was guilty of the lease.
Supreme Court in 2196/2545.
The lease between the plaintiff and the six years but has not registered a claim to the court for only three years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 538, but after three years the defendant continued to lease the land to another by the plaintiff without objection must be considered. The lease is for an indefinite period under section 570, the plaintiff, the defendant can not terminate the lease at any time. But notice the first method as defined in Section 566 will expire six years if the plaintiff intends to terminate the lease. Plaintiff's notice in advance is not that the contract be suspended, the schedule was agreed by all to be given before the Section 564 on the defendant receives notice of termination to the plaintiff, the case was filed for a full two months. accordance with Section 566 of the termination of the contract and the like. The defendant owed the plaintiff a notice to the defendant to pay the rent and the rent is due. Which at least 15 days to sue under Section 560, paragraph two, the plaintiff is entitled to sue the defendant drove to the defendant and demanded payment of rent arrears have.
Supreme Court to 407/2545.
Buildings and leases space on the back of the building between the plaintiff and the defendant has a lease term in accordance with Section 564 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which will hold the back end. At the end of the period as agreed. After the expiration of the lease. The plaintiff has requested a trade, or who live in the area where the defendant for the plaintiff will not do any leases with tenants including the defendant with it. Marks the termination of the lease to the defendant to clear up. The plaintiff need not act like that. The plaintiff, accept the rent from the defendants was just to get them as part of the damages that the plaintiff received from the defendant to deliver the lease, only for it to contract again for an indefinite period of time. But somehow, when the defendant is still not out of the lease. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 4551/2544.
Subject matter of the lease rental period of eight months from February to October 2539 if the tenant fails to pay the lease rental to be terminated without notice. Defendant to pay the rent until August 2539. Then fails to pay the rent and lease a commercial building lease dispute for a period of course. Fails to pay rent on the lease to be terminated without notice under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 388, the plaintiff is not required notice to terminate the lease to the defendant prior to rental period in accordance with Section 566.
Supreme Court in 3898/2542.
There is no fixed term lease agreement for a month. Pay the rent every month that a lessor to terminate the lease on May 4, 2538 shall be deemed to terminate the lease at the end of the lease the next time is set at 1 Min. York. 2538, when the lessor has given notice to the defendant to give 30 days notice that it is time to pay the rent for a while at least according to Section 566 to terminate the lease of the lessor. Despite the verbal notice was unlawful. And after the termination of the contract on July 1, 2538 Lease Agreement shall cease to do so.
Supreme Court in 8948/2542.
The lease for the lessor is the owner of the property must be leased. The defendant agrees to lease the disputed property from the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have the rights and obligations as lessor under the contract. When the plaintiff that the defendant's breach of contract. Plaintiff, the lessor would have the power to sue the defendant as a tenant in the transaction with the plaintiff.
Leases have a term of a lease dispute that plaintiff has no obligation to advance notice to terminate the contract before the deadline of 2 months.
Plaintiff to the defendant the loan. The plaintiff does not bear interest and money to the maintenance of buildings, furniture, consumer disputes, there is always good for the benefit of the defendant himself. The defendant did not appear to be invested in repairing the building, conflict and greatly benefit the plaintiff may be regarded as a reward is more than a simple lease contract lease dispute between the plaintiff with each defendant. Permitting land and buildings, but no matter what the conditions or the time to give a new lease or rental of how to hold the lessor and the lessee is bound to renew the lease. return. So I do not agree that the defendant in return for a more conventional contract.
Supreme Court in 2297/2541.
The plaintiff is the registered owner of the disputed land and tenement usufruct of the land next to Thor Thor, the usufruct agreement as to the defendant as a tenant for a period of 30 years without a contract. in writing and registered with the competent authority. Contract to be binding on the plaintiff who owned the land dispute. Even during the term of the lease, it died as a result Tor the usufruct of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1418, but last paragraph is without prejudice to the rights of defendants, a third party. And result in the suspension of the contract impossible. The plaintiff has no right to sue the defendant drove the two.
Supreme Court in 3367/2540.
Under contract for a tenement that "If the landlord agreed to sell the leased property prior to any rent due under the contract then the landlord to let tenants know beforehand. Tenants ready to leave the leased property for a period of not less than two months. And the lessor must inform the tenant that he will agree to sell to anyone. Is how much money. The tenant will have the opportunity to agree to buy it when it is appropriate, "the only conditions on the lessor to sell the leased property before the expiry of the lease agreement must notify the tenant to pay. before The tenant has the right to purchase the leased property before the others. The tenant has the right to purchase the leased property before any other person until the expiration of the lease contract. When the defendant is a land dispute with the Town for the 3 stand for the three defendants after the expiry of the lease contract. The four plaintiffs to lease the commercial building and three units were later disputed by the due date. The four plaintiffs had no right to demand that the defendant is a lessor for the leased property to the plaintiff's four. The four plaintiffs are not in a position where the creditor will have the power to revoke the legal documents filed with the Town of land dispute between a defendant and the defendant, 3.
Supreme Court in 1062/2539.
Lease for a period of 20 years from the date of August 13, 2515 and end on August 13, 2535, without notice prior to the application. Civil Code Section 564, the plaintiff sued the defendant drove a 4-day after leases end, the plaintiff's complaint did not allow a defendant in a land dispute further. The plaintiff sued the defendant drove without a contract again.
Section 565 of the rental section. You may be presumed that for each year.
Rent in his rented presumed to Napi's season one.
Section 566 is scheduled to appear in the rental agreement or not they believed the gem. That party may terminate the lease at the time when the rent is due every time. I need to give notice to the other party to pay the rent for a short period of time, but must be at least two months notice.
Section 567 if the rental property lost gem. He said it would hold a lease.
Section 568 if the property is rented and not lost, but only in part be due to the fault of the tenant. He said the tenants are known to reduce the rent by the lost time.
In such a case. If tenants are unable to implement the remaining assets of the success of the mission as soon entered into the contract. That the lessee will lose his contract.
Section 569 of the leased property shall not be extinguished because of transfer of property for rent.
Transferee to accept the rights and obligations of the transferor and the tenants as well.
Section 570 of the end of the period of lease has been agreed that, if the tenant continues to occupy the property. And the lessor, then they are not upset gem. The parties shall be deemed to have entered into the next without time limit.
Section 571, if the lease is not terminated or suspended in it. The tenants have been cultivating rice gem. That the lessee shall have the right to rule over them until the finish on. I have to pay the rent.
Supreme Court in 6458/2551.
The plaintiff is a minor, a 17 year old son was lawfully on the pass. plaintiff sued the owner of the disputed land by inheritance from the past. The defendant had a land dispute, despite the contract with this This is the law of the wife. but after the lease contract. death, then this is the case with the owner of the land. And there is no law that will require the lessor is the owner of the leased property when the plaintiff is required to transfer the disputed land and the rights and duties under Section 569 plaintiffs have sued the authority.
According to Section 1402 stipulates that "any person entitled to live in the house, that person shall be entitled to stay in the house. Without paying the rent, "we see that the residents have only the right to live in the house of another person only. When listening to the fact that such a defendant's own home. The plaintiff sued the defendant and the family drove to demolish the building in the land of the plaintiff disputes the defendant has no right to live in a land dispute further on notice to plaintiff. Defendant out of the land dispute, but the defendant ignored the plaintiff's action against it. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 6179/2551.
The plaintiff is entitled to lease state's Division of the Department of Treasury, Ministry of Finance. Building, commercial building, No. 231 the plaintiff sued to expel the defendant from the property valuable for the filing month, 2,000 a plaintiff may claim damages from the date of termination of the contract month, 10,000 are reimbursed as part of a lawsuit against the driver. chase. It must appeal to the facts Civil Code Procedure Section 224 paragraph one and paragraph two. The defendant appealed that The plaintiff did not intend to sublease the leasehold. An appeal on the issue of facts to lead to legislation that Sublease agreement is a legal right to secretly transfer the lease or not. The defendant appealed on this point by the judges who sit in the trial court did not. That there are reasonable grounds to appeal the violation of the provisions of that law.
The sub-floor building, the agreement is a contract that the duration of the contract must comply with Section 566 of the sublease agreement is the agreement to pay 2,000 baht a month's rent. the payment of rent, of course. It takes a month to pay rent under the Section 559 plaintiff and the defendant in writing to terminate the sublease agreement was received on August 4, 2537 plaintiff filed a lawsuit on March 21, 2538 termination. sublease was like then.
Supreme Court in 4207/2551.
When the lease is terminated and the lessor to terminate the contract. Tenants must get out of the lease. When the lease is terminated, then the tenant is not out of the lease. The lessor from the lessee the right to sue in court because the action. Dispute the lessor's rights under Section 55 Civil Code Procedure lessor to evict a tenant from the lease shall be made by the court. The court is mandatory. The lessor has the right to break into locked doors is prohibited. President of the tenants inside the building so that the two defendants entered the premises of the plaintiff and then shut the door lock is prohibited. The managing director of the building, it is a violation of the plaintiff under Section 420.
Supreme Court in 5491/2550.
The defendant requested the testimony of the four defendants are.
1) with respect to authorize the prosecution of the former. The plaintiff's attorney's signature is forged signature. The seal is not critical of the plaintiff's registered trademark.
2) with respect to property disputes that claim and the defendant is entitled to a reciprocal agreement. Live life to it. The plaintiff had no title to the land and building rent.
3) Article about the termination and notice to the plaintiff's claim that it's not like it. The law is that After the lease ended. The defendant remains in possession of the leased premises by the plaintiff did not have any objection to the lease at the time of termination of the lease must be subject to the provisions of Section 566 before the plaintiff sued to terminate the contract, and books. written notice of termination of the plaintiff but the plaintiff has no power to sue and
4) The plaintiff sued on the grounds that it is Recondite. The plaintiff sued without narrative describing how the defendant came into the house on the land. Dispute is located in alleys. Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against dark All the facts and the cause of the decline in new defense transformation. The original defendants in the first place. As well as the District Court to issue an order allowing the defendant's request to modify the defendant may file a request before the hearing date. It is not correct minor errors or amendments in respect. The public order. If not why, except that the defendant may request a hearing after the defendant filed a petition P.wi.p. Section 180 of the notice of the hearing date, so it is. Violation of such provisions in the defendant's petition in verse 3) and 4) to raise a defense request that the court modify the order. Allow the defendant to the claim in court. It is not raised in the petition that was lawfully in the District Court. The Court of Appeal ruled that the defendant and the plaintiff later. It is not raised in the petition that was lawfully in the District Court and the Court. The appeal did not like the Civil Code Procedure Section 249.
Supreme Court in 4260/2550.
Land formerly owned by the trustee of T. T. The Bank has entered into a lease for a period of 20 years at Bank of tenement buildings on the land. It is combined with the land under Section 146 the plaintiff bought the land from the trustee of T. During the term of the lease. The plaintiff is the owner of commercial building But at the end of the lease the land bank would be entitled to the land required to demolish the commercial building commercial building unless the Bank agrees to become the plaintiff. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff when the defendant has authorized the Town. Tenement acquisition of land and will become vested in accordance with Section 144, paragraph two of the plaintiff, but the bank that owns the tenement house law has no power to limit the duration of the lease. When the lease expired. The duration of the dispute over the rent that would not fall to the plaintiff under section 569 on the plaintiff does not dispute that the defendant is in the room anymore. But she did not go out. The action against the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 5387/2549.
The defendant has made a commercial building lease dispute with the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have the rights and obligations as lessor under the contract and the defendant must be bound by the contract made with the plaintiff. When the defendant fails to pay the rent, the plaintiff's breach of contract and terminate the contract. Therefore, the plaintiff filed this lawsuit. The problem is that the plaintiff is the owner of rental property are not material to the case. And lease the building, the rental rate of 17,000 per month for a year when they come due in Town Court on the defendant to remain under Section 570, the plaintiff, the defendant shall be deemed to have made a new contract. schedule, which means that the agreement becomes effective the next time. The other contract is to lease it. The rate of rent. And by virtue of Section 538, this Lease shall be evidenced in writing signed by either party shall be liable as a priority. Otherwise, legal action is not. Thus, when the plaintiff is forced to ask the defendant to pay the rent. The rental rate is higher than that stipulated in the lease contract. The plaintiff must have evidence in writing of any defendant to show that it has signed an agreement to lease the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff introduced evidence that the parties have agreed to increase the rent at 20,000 Baht per month, it is prohibited by Section 94 Civil Code Procedure defendant would be liable to pay the rent owed by the rate of 17,000 per month. rent in the lease.
Supreme Court in 5142/2549.
Defendant to the plaintiff for a period of one year lease with rent paid in advance by the 19th day of each month at the end of rental period, then the plaintiff paid the rent paid in advance. Defendant on November 19, 2543 before the plaintiff would have to terminate the lease to the defendant on November 21, 2543 held that the plaintiff and the defendant has entered a new lease for an indefinite period under the Section. 570 objection to the defendant after the lease was due to 3 days may indicate that the plaintiff intends to lease to the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff terminated the lease and the provisions of Section 566 on the termination of the lease of the plaintiff, not the plaintiff has no power to sue.
Supreme Court in 3822/2548.
The original contract between plaintiff and defendant to settle because the end of the morning and no conditions or obligations that the defendant is required to lease to the plaintiff. The defendant is the government refusing to renew leases to the plaintiff and the defendant have a right of ownership under the law. The defendant notified the plaintiff that does not want to lease land to the plaintiff. Administrative order is not to ask the court to revoke it.
Supreme Court in 1602/2548.
Subject matter of the plaintiff is the owner by inheritance of grade I entered a commercial building leased to the defendant disputes. The 15-year lease with a lease agreement, Article 11 states that at the end of the lease and the lessor will lease every three years under the agreement. It is a commitment that will allow tenants to renew for next time. It does not cause the contract. But this promise is not binding because it's not that I had to meet before I died when she learned that I proposed to death on July 5, 2537 before the expiry of the lease. Date December 31, 2538 case must be governed by Section 360, which stipulates that prohibits the provisions of Section 169 shall not apply to such a commitment I will not become effective and not as a legacy. The plaintiff, an heir is bound to comply with the provisions of Section 1599 and Section 1600 of the defendant's request for renewal has no effect. And does not cause a new lease. The plaintiff sued to terminate the lease and evict the defendant and family disputes out of the building.
Supreme Court in 1035/2547.
The 3-year lease agreement will terminate at the end of the period. Without prior notice. To combat that, due to the defendant rented. The defendant remains in the land lease and pay rent to the plaintiff. I accept the plaintiff without objection. The plaintiff, the defendant has entered a new period without it. This means that the agreement on the term are not effective in the next section. The other terms as the original agreement, including the rent. If the lease is true that the defendant had no reason to pay higher rental rates as specified in the lease contract. And serve as proof of the defendant to pay the rent, there is no weight to the hearing and the evidence does not refute the plaintiff. So I do not think the plaintiff had a new lease. The defendant must be immediately removed from the leased land at the end of the period. The plaintiff need not have terminated the contract with the defendant before the Court.
Supreme Court in 5866/2545.
Lease between the landlord and the tenant is a contract or a lease agreement, reciprocal worse than normal. It is a matter between the parties. Not a problem with public order.
Supreme Court in 3819/2545.
While the transfer of land between the plaintiff and the vendor land. Land is under lease. The land sale was registered with the Bank for a period of 20 years and has become the owner of the land and buildings when the lease expired at the end of the lease term so as not registered. Building in the land of the plaintiff was vested with the transferee bank shall be entitled to lease the commercial building and a room in a tenement building has been sublet to any person. Defendants have no right to sublease to a tenant rather than the original. May not raise the rent between the Bank and the defendant is a defense to the plaintiff, the owner of the property in dispute. The defendant remains in dispute later. It is a violation of the plaintiff. Plaintiffs have filed the eviction notice to the defendant without the defendant and the attendant out of the dispute.
Supreme Court in 3254/2545.
Her husband, plaintiff entered into a land lease from the defendant. The lease is due for a husband had died. Even if the defendant allowed the plaintiff and the plaintiff's husband in the land that was leased after the expiry of the period of lease. It is regarded as a new land to lease for an indefinite time period. But it is the plaintiff in the land lease by the lease of the plaintiff's husband, who is a party. If the defendant's misconduct, the contract would have liked to plaintiff's husband, a tenant must admonish the defendant as a successor trustee of her husband and the defendant's lessor. When her husband, the plaintiff sued the defendant until the plaintiff's husband died. Lease would be extinguished. The plaintiff, the wife of the lessee does not have to wear the right to lease the plaintiff's husband, who died at legal action against the defendant was guilty of the lease.
Supreme Court in 2196/2545.
The lease between the plaintiff and the six years but has not registered a claim to the court for only three years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 538, but after three years the defendant continued to lease the land to another by the plaintiff without objection must be considered. The lease is for an indefinite period under section 570, the plaintiff, the defendant can not terminate the lease at any time. But notice the first method as defined in Section 566 will expire six years if the plaintiff intends to terminate the lease. Plaintiff's notice in advance is not that the contract be suspended, the schedule was agreed by all to be given before the Section 564 on the defendant receives notice of termination to the plaintiff, the case was filed for a full two months. accordance with Section 566 of the termination of the contract and the like. The defendant owed the plaintiff a notice to the defendant to pay the rent and the rent is due. Which at least 15 days to sue under Section 560, paragraph two, the plaintiff is entitled to sue the defendant drove to the defendant and demanded payment of rent arrears have.
Supreme Court to 407/2545.
Buildings and leases space on the back of the building between the plaintiff and the defendant has a lease term in accordance with Section 564 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which will hold the back end. At the end of the period as agreed. After the expiration of the lease. The plaintiff has requested a trade, or who live in the area where the defendant for the plaintiff will not do any leases with tenants including the defendant with it. Marks the termination of the lease to the defendant to clear up. The plaintiff need not act like that. The plaintiff, accept the rent from the defendants was just to get them as part of the damages that the plaintiff received from the defendant to deliver the lease, only for it to contract again for an indefinite period of time. But somehow, when the defendant is still not out of the lease. The plaintiff sued the defendant evicted.
Supreme Court in 4551/2544.
Subject matter of the lease rental period of eight months from February to October 2539 if the tenant fails to pay the lease rental to be terminated without notice. Defendant to pay the rent until August 2539. Then fails to pay the rent and lease a commercial building lease dispute for a period of course. Fails to pay rent on the lease to be terminated without notice under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 388, the plaintiff is not required notice to terminate the lease to the defendant prior to rental period in accordance with Section 566.
Supreme Court in 3898/2542.
There is no fixed term lease agreement for a month. Pay the rent every month that a lessor to terminate the lease on May 4, 2538 shall be deemed to terminate the lease at the end of the lease the next time is set at 1 Min. York. 2538, when the lessor has given notice to the defendant to give 30 days notice that it is time to pay the rent for a while at least according to Section 566 to terminate the lease of the lessor. Despite the verbal notice was unlawful. And after the termination of the contract on July 1, 2538 Lease Agreement shall cease to do so.
Supreme Court in 8948/2542.
The lease for the lessor is the owner of the property must be leased. The defendant agrees to lease the disputed property from the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have the rights and obligations as lessor under the contract. When the plaintiff that the defendant's breach of contract. Plaintiff, the lessor would have the power to sue the defendant as a tenant in the transaction with the plaintiff.
Leases have a term of a lease dispute that plaintiff has no obligation to advance notice to terminate the contract before the deadline of 2 months.
Plaintiff to the defendant the loan. The plaintiff does not bear interest and money to the maintenance of buildings, furniture, consumer disputes, there is always good for the benefit of the defendant himself. The defendant did not appear to be invested in repairing the building, conflict and greatly benefit the plaintiff may be regarded as a reward is more than a simple lease contract lease dispute between the plaintiff with each defendant. Permitting land and buildings, but no matter what the conditions or the time to give a new lease or rental of how to hold the lessor and the lessee is bound to renew the lease. return. So I do not agree that the defendant in return for a more conventional contract.
Supreme Court in 2297/2541.
The plaintiff is the registered owner of the disputed land and tenement usufruct of the land next to Thor Thor, the usufruct agreement as to the defendant as a tenant for a period of 30 years without a contract. in writing and registered with the competent authority. Contract to be binding on the plaintiff who owned the land dispute. Even during the term of the lease, it died as a result Tor the usufruct of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1418, but last paragraph is without prejudice to the rights of defendants, a third party. And result in the suspension of the contract impossible. The plaintiff has no right to sue the defendant drove the two.
Supreme Court in 3367/2540.
Under contract for a tenement that "If the landlord agreed to sell the leased property prior to any rent due under the contract then the landlord to let tenants know beforehand. Tenants ready to leave the leased property for a period of not less than two months. And the lessor must inform the tenant that he will agree to sell to anyone. Is how much money. The tenant will have the opportunity to agree to buy it when it is appropriate, "the only conditions on the lessor to sell the leased property before the expiry of the lease agreement must notify the tenant to pay. before The tenant has the right to purchase the leased property before the others. The tenant has the right to purchase the leased property before any other person until the expiration of the lease contract. When the defendant is a land dispute with the Town for the 3 stand for the three defendants after the expiry of the lease contract. The four plaintiffs to lease the commercial building and three units were later disputed by the due date. The four plaintiffs had no right to demand that the defendant is a lessor for the leased property to the plaintiff's four. The four plaintiffs are not in a position where the creditor will have the power to revoke the legal documents filed with the Town of land dispute between a defendant and the defendant, 3.
Supreme Court in 1062/2539.
Lease for a period of 20 years from the date of August 13, 2515 and end on August 13, 2535, without notice prior to the application. Civil Code Section 564, the plaintiff sued the defendant drove a 4-day after leases end, the plaintiff's complaint did not allow a defendant in a land dispute further. The plaintiff sued the defendant drove without a contract again.
