Section 503 of the sale as the seller must deliver the property as an example.
Selling the description the seller must deliver the property to match the description.
Section 504 in liability for the transmission of the sample does not meet. Or does not meet that description. You shall not be filed after the expiration of one year from the time of delivery.
Section 505 of that for Allowance like to sell were traded on the condition that the buyer had the opportunity to inspect the property before the purchase.
Section 506 to inspect the property. If it is not scheduled to hold a seller may set a reasonable time. And notice to the buyer to respond within such a purchase or not.
Section 507 property, the buyer will review before it is delivered to them. If the buyer did not check within the time specified by the contract. Or by tradition. Or by a notice to the seller if the seller shall have no further obligation.
Section 508 on the property is delivered to the buyer to make sure the transaction would be the perfect case is the following.
(1) If the buyer does not notice that the order within the time stipulated by the contract. Or by tradition. Or by notice or
(2) If the buyer has no property within the said period or such.
(3) If the total purchase price of such property. Or in part, or
(4) If the buyer sells the property. Or otherwise, any implication that the purchase of it.
Supreme Court in 6473/2551.
The defendant disputes the plaintiff has failed to transfer the units scheduled in the contract. And not building infrastructure. To meet the contract. The defendant is at fault. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the agreement under Section 388, when the contract was made available by the parties would have been entitled to. Intention to terminate the other party. The intention to do. And there was no legal basis to go and the intention of Section 149, 150 and Section 168 on the end of 2541 the plaintiff testified that the defendant is under construction. Plaintiff demanded the defendant pay the money back. Employees of the defendant claims that the Commission must consult first and then ignore the non-payment. Refunded to the plaintiff, which was. Testified on plaintiff's lawyer cross-examine that. In 2541 after the plaintiff had to ask for a refund. The defendant did not return the money to the plaintiff. Shows that when a defendant fails to condominium ownership dispute to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract by the defendant's intention to claim the money back. It is like the above-mentioned provisions. The plaintiff has terminated the contract before the defendant will notify the plaintiff to register. Transferred. It is then terminated the contract lawfully. In accordance with Section 393 notices are required and can not impressed to hear that the plaintiff did not take delivery of the unit condition is critical.
Supreme Court to 121/2543.
The plaintiff and the defendant had the intention to buy and sell cars on the condition that the defendant will be. Plaintiff's vehicle to go to trial before the seven days if satisfied that the defendant pay the plaintiff's money. Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant's intent to imply that the two parties to buy and sell. Vehicles since the beginning. The defendant received the plaintiff's car was out of contract Kaieผืeachab. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 505, the plaintiff, the defendant was driving a delivery car. Deemed to be sure then. Trading shall be of age. I did not notice that the defendant did not accept the purchase and delivery of vehicles within the period prescribed in Section 508 (a) (2) If it appears that The plaintiff's car and disappeared. And the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff's car to admonish each other in a civil. Actions of the defendant is not guilty according to law.
Supreme Court in 1060/2541.
The plan annexed to the agreement to sell that house and land disputes. Townhouse and condominium projects. The road in front and rear. Street road sign in the front left is the house 7 rooms and 7 rooms right next to the house to the pool and courtyard area of the sky. The condominium building located adjacent to the road in the back. And the plaintiff agreed to buy a townhouse hotel bed. 7 that the color yellow, which is near the pool of defendants on the map. Indicates location of town houses to be constructed under the project's offerings. The defendant has sky-ground pool. The condo is located in an elegant, beautiful to live. Not isolated as an isolated house only 14 rooms is located opposite of each other, you'll see the difference that may not. Commensurate The defendant's construction of town houses alone, without a pool terrace. To fill the sky and condominium project that was advertised to be located. The house is built different, a different one. Unlike a townhouse located in Project released an ad to our clients. Held that a defendant's breach of contract, the plaintiff prefers to terminate the contract. Without regard to whether the pool and yard facilities are provided. Town house or not. The plaintiff is entitled to use such facilities or not. To do with differences in the ownership of their respective owners. Townhouse and condominium unit owners in any way And even had to split the project into two parts: a sub-project of the townhouse. And most of the projects. It does not make a project from the defendant to constitute breach of contract.
Supreme Court in 7727/2540.
Returns from the plaintiff to the defendant. And to pay fines and damages on grounds that the defendant does not deliver. As stated in the agreement, which breach Article 7, which is not a valid contract to deliver the order. Defects or damage caused by the fault of the plaintiff by the defendant under Article 9 does not require notification. Delivery to the defendant before filing the complaint. Contracts, cocoa powder, Article 7 states that if it appears that the goods traded, all or part of a quality, origin or type not in accordance with the list specified in the order attached to the contract the buyer has the right to reject or accept. remove all or part. Even so, some products just are not in accordance with the plaintiff's rights. Evasion does not eliminate some of the products and goods traded on the defendant sent. The contract does not meet the defendant and the plaintiff refused to accept delivery of the said defendant so. Is obliged to refund payment to the plaintiff. With penalties and other damages under the contract. The tenders, which are part of the agreement stated that an example of that. Send it to the auction for the benefit of the TTM to examine the contracts and agreements are based on the type of quality to meet the objectives and the satisfaction of Monopoly. In addition, the contract does not specify that. Vendors must submit a sample to match, but one without any conditions. The quality of the goods under the agreement otherwise it shows that for the contest. Solely for the wholesale price to check quality. Not be used to determine which of the delivery contract must be met. For example, cocoa powder or not such contracts are not traded as an example.
Supreme Court in 9157/2539.
The Sale by description is to sell the buyer does not see or inspect the property sold. The purchase agreement was believed to describe the nature of identity and quality. Property is described by the seller or a buyer, and even if they have seen. If such property may be difficult to monitor the quality and the buyer agrees. Purchased through the narration of the seller as well as Sale by description as well. The defendant advertised in the sale of the defendant with the prospectus and map display. The project includes a sub-divided land. Plaintiff agreed to buy the land dispute because the defendant had advertised. When the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement to buy and sell land, so that the land specified in the contract. The difference appears as stated in the contract that the land has been marked by Shall be considered as part of the contract. It can be considered a sale by description. Later, when the defendant has changed the layout of the project by moving the entrance to it. The east side to stay away from the land of the plaintiff to 1,200 meters in the center and other facilities to 1,700 meters to go away so it does not match the description. The defendant is at fault. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant because the defendant's breach of contract damages is not the issue. The defendant delivered to plaintiff's property to meet the contract. However, the defects in the property will be 1 year old and under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 474 does not apply.
Supreme Court in 3889/2548.
Watch accused the victim's house, number 7 to make sure her husband with the intent to sell and an agreement will be used. Time to check about 14 days if the defendant has decided not to inform the victim that night, I do not buy or watch the full 14 days to notify the victim and the defendant did not deliver the clock back. Constitutes the defendant agreed to buy the clock, 7 to buy a house as a result of age, according to Section 508 Allowance like to sell the defendant is obligated to pay to the victim. If a person fails to pay to correct the defendant in civil contracts for defendants who are guilty of misappropriation.
Supreme Court in 7318/2537.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Defendant's encroachment into the tenement building in the street where the defendant has agreed to a contract. With the plaintiff and the plan was advertised in the road, 2 m. If the facts as the plaintiff's claims. Actions of the defendant would be entitled to the plaintiff's argument, the plaintiff shall have the power to sue. Plaintiff and defendant entered into by that slogan. Therefore, the relationship is based on qualifying. The defendant is responsible for the sale of assets to meet the description.
Supreme Court in 1060/2541.
The plan annexed to the agreement to sell that house and land disputes. Townhouse and condominium projects. The road in front and rear. Street road sign in the front left is the house 7 rooms and 7 rooms right next to the house to the pool and courtyard area of the sky. The condominium building located adjacent to the road in the back. And the plaintiff agreed to buy a townhouse hotel bed. 7 that the color yellow, which is near the pool of defendants on the map. Indicates location of town houses to be constructed under the project's offerings. The defendant has sky-ground pool. The condo is located in an elegant, beautiful to live. Not isolated as an isolated house only 14 rooms is located opposite of each other, you'll see the difference that may not. Commensurate The defendant's construction of town houses alone, without a pool terrace. To fill the sky and condominium project that was advertised to be located. The house is built different, a different one. Unlike a townhouse located in Project released an ad to our clients. Held that a defendant's breach of contract, the plaintiff prefers to terminate the contract. Without regard to whether the pool and yard facilities are provided. Town house or not. The plaintiff is entitled to use such facilities or not. To do with differences in the ownership of their respective owners. Townhouse and condominium unit owners in any way And even had to split the project into two parts: a sub-project of the townhouse. And most of the projects. It does not make a project from the defendant to constitute breach of contract.
Supreme Court to 903/2539.
The plaintiff contracted to buy Cross Arm Agilent 1,100 pieces from the defendant's contract documents. Mon 1 Article 1 of the specification meets the Pacific, all applications submitted to the plaintiff. Sold by the company. Kang Cheng Thailand And 2 is that the vendor certifies that the products sold under the contract are not less than Defined as detailed in Article 1 and to the Pacific by an application attached. When the seller certifies that the laboratory must have a minimum quality requirements. And prior contracts with the plaintiff held the tender specifications and The quality of the tender when the defendant has already bid. According to the contract documents for the transaction includes the sale of 0.1. Conditions of the plaintiff in a bid to allow the plaintiff to sell. Therefore, detailed quality control before the end of the contract is just detail. It is not only the normal trading transactions as a seller. Must deliver the property to meet the trial and in this regard, there is no law. Age, otherwise it will be ten years under the Civil and Commercial Section. The new 164 or 193/30.
Supreme Court in 1486/2538.
The defendant will be published in daily newspapers for the sale of a condominium, the defendant is under construction, with illustrations. Condominium project and has prepared a letter to distribute to your guests. But when the plaintiff to request the purchase of the condominium units of the defendant. The two sides signed an agreement to buy luxury suites and as evidence that agreement. Map attached to the building are intended to show that the number and size of the unit only. Map does not lead to certification of any such agreement, the other end for a description of the plaintiff to purchase the unit price schedule for completion. Scheduled transfer. Rights and obligations of the plaintiff against the defendant for the same. The plaintiff and the defendant would be bound to sell the unit on contracts set aside for that purpose to be bound by the publication of a newspaper or letter of the defendant's non-trading unit, between the plaintiff and the defendant was not a trade description.
Supreme Court to 784/2537.
The tender notice, the creditor has given the product you are looking to buy. Characteristics of material to be used by the department of shares of restricted stock with a bid of B specifications to meet the buyer's credit limit. And the creditor agrees to purchase it. The transaction was an ordinary transaction arising from the proposal and to direct them to use as trade samples or by describing it. B. The Partnership does not deliver a product that is under contract with the quotation. And not as a creditor. The Partnership. It is an agreement. Creditors would be damaged. And are free to terminate the contract due to the two as the managing partner of Partnership. B. It shall refund the payment to creditors, plus interest.
Claims for refund of the purchase agreement does not break the law with age, especially Must be age 10 years.
Supreme Court in 1457/2526.
Spare parts contracts. Allow a plaintiff who monitor and test product quality. If it appears that the delivery of quality does not meet the sample. The list of specified contracts. Plaintiff reserves the right not to receive such goods as it is not an ordinary trading transactions by the description or the age of 10 years.
Supreme Court in 2762/2524.
The sale will buy Kaitamcmprrnna. When the transaction by the buyer that the subtitle to the identity and The quality of the product. The plaintiff offered one brand-pin, manufactured by the same manufacturer of the pin. Brands that had been used. This suggests that a similar standard as the only claim of the plaintiff's product, the advertising vendor. No details of the size that it is formally accepted as a sale by description.
The seller is not liable for defects in the property sale. That is later delivered. The buyer has no rights. Withhold the price unpaid.
Supreme Court in 1176/2524.
First, the defendant agreed to buy a copy of the plaintiff. The defendant tried to live up to a month to show that the defendant be tested for quality and performance of copiers and accessories. Copy is satisfied. If the defendant is not buying because they believe the plaintiff's description. Not a trade description.
Selling the description the seller must deliver the property to match the description.
Section 504 in liability for the transmission of the sample does not meet. Or does not meet that description. You shall not be filed after the expiration of one year from the time of delivery.
Section 505 of that for Allowance like to sell were traded on the condition that the buyer had the opportunity to inspect the property before the purchase.
Section 506 to inspect the property. If it is not scheduled to hold a seller may set a reasonable time. And notice to the buyer to respond within such a purchase or not.
Section 507 property, the buyer will review before it is delivered to them. If the buyer did not check within the time specified by the contract. Or by tradition. Or by a notice to the seller if the seller shall have no further obligation.
Section 508 on the property is delivered to the buyer to make sure the transaction would be the perfect case is the following.
(1) If the buyer does not notice that the order within the time stipulated by the contract. Or by tradition. Or by notice or
(2) If the buyer has no property within the said period or such.
(3) If the total purchase price of such property. Or in part, or
(4) If the buyer sells the property. Or otherwise, any implication that the purchase of it.
Supreme Court in 6473/2551.
The defendant disputes the plaintiff has failed to transfer the units scheduled in the contract. And not building infrastructure. To meet the contract. The defendant is at fault. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the agreement under Section 388, when the contract was made available by the parties would have been entitled to. Intention to terminate the other party. The intention to do. And there was no legal basis to go and the intention of Section 149, 150 and Section 168 on the end of 2541 the plaintiff testified that the defendant is under construction. Plaintiff demanded the defendant pay the money back. Employees of the defendant claims that the Commission must consult first and then ignore the non-payment. Refunded to the plaintiff, which was. Testified on plaintiff's lawyer cross-examine that. In 2541 after the plaintiff had to ask for a refund. The defendant did not return the money to the plaintiff. Shows that when a defendant fails to condominium ownership dispute to the plaintiff. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract by the defendant's intention to claim the money back. It is like the above-mentioned provisions. The plaintiff has terminated the contract before the defendant will notify the plaintiff to register. Transferred. It is then terminated the contract lawfully. In accordance with Section 393 notices are required and can not impressed to hear that the plaintiff did not take delivery of the unit condition is critical.
Supreme Court to 121/2543.
The plaintiff and the defendant had the intention to buy and sell cars on the condition that the defendant will be. Plaintiff's vehicle to go to trial before the seven days if satisfied that the defendant pay the plaintiff's money. Agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant's intent to imply that the two parties to buy and sell. Vehicles since the beginning. The defendant received the plaintiff's car was out of contract Kaieผืeachab. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 505, the plaintiff, the defendant was driving a delivery car. Deemed to be sure then. Trading shall be of age. I did not notice that the defendant did not accept the purchase and delivery of vehicles within the period prescribed in Section 508 (a) (2) If it appears that The plaintiff's car and disappeared. And the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff's car to admonish each other in a civil. Actions of the defendant is not guilty according to law.
Supreme Court in 1060/2541.
The plan annexed to the agreement to sell that house and land disputes. Townhouse and condominium projects. The road in front and rear. Street road sign in the front left is the house 7 rooms and 7 rooms right next to the house to the pool and courtyard area of the sky. The condominium building located adjacent to the road in the back. And the plaintiff agreed to buy a townhouse hotel bed. 7 that the color yellow, which is near the pool of defendants on the map. Indicates location of town houses to be constructed under the project's offerings. The defendant has sky-ground pool. The condo is located in an elegant, beautiful to live. Not isolated as an isolated house only 14 rooms is located opposite of each other, you'll see the difference that may not. Commensurate The defendant's construction of town houses alone, without a pool terrace. To fill the sky and condominium project that was advertised to be located. The house is built different, a different one. Unlike a townhouse located in Project released an ad to our clients. Held that a defendant's breach of contract, the plaintiff prefers to terminate the contract. Without regard to whether the pool and yard facilities are provided. Town house or not. The plaintiff is entitled to use such facilities or not. To do with differences in the ownership of their respective owners. Townhouse and condominium unit owners in any way And even had to split the project into two parts: a sub-project of the townhouse. And most of the projects. It does not make a project from the defendant to constitute breach of contract.
Supreme Court in 7727/2540.
Returns from the plaintiff to the defendant. And to pay fines and damages on grounds that the defendant does not deliver. As stated in the agreement, which breach Article 7, which is not a valid contract to deliver the order. Defects or damage caused by the fault of the plaintiff by the defendant under Article 9 does not require notification. Delivery to the defendant before filing the complaint. Contracts, cocoa powder, Article 7 states that if it appears that the goods traded, all or part of a quality, origin or type not in accordance with the list specified in the order attached to the contract the buyer has the right to reject or accept. remove all or part. Even so, some products just are not in accordance with the plaintiff's rights. Evasion does not eliminate some of the products and goods traded on the defendant sent. The contract does not meet the defendant and the plaintiff refused to accept delivery of the said defendant so. Is obliged to refund payment to the plaintiff. With penalties and other damages under the contract. The tenders, which are part of the agreement stated that an example of that. Send it to the auction for the benefit of the TTM to examine the contracts and agreements are based on the type of quality to meet the objectives and the satisfaction of Monopoly. In addition, the contract does not specify that. Vendors must submit a sample to match, but one without any conditions. The quality of the goods under the agreement otherwise it shows that for the contest. Solely for the wholesale price to check quality. Not be used to determine which of the delivery contract must be met. For example, cocoa powder or not such contracts are not traded as an example.
Supreme Court in 9157/2539.
The Sale by description is to sell the buyer does not see or inspect the property sold. The purchase agreement was believed to describe the nature of identity and quality. Property is described by the seller or a buyer, and even if they have seen. If such property may be difficult to monitor the quality and the buyer agrees. Purchased through the narration of the seller as well as Sale by description as well. The defendant advertised in the sale of the defendant with the prospectus and map display. The project includes a sub-divided land. Plaintiff agreed to buy the land dispute because the defendant had advertised. When the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement to buy and sell land, so that the land specified in the contract. The difference appears as stated in the contract that the land has been marked by Shall be considered as part of the contract. It can be considered a sale by description. Later, when the defendant has changed the layout of the project by moving the entrance to it. The east side to stay away from the land of the plaintiff to 1,200 meters in the center and other facilities to 1,700 meters to go away so it does not match the description. The defendant is at fault. The plaintiff has the right to terminate the agreement. The plaintiff sued the defendant because the defendant's breach of contract damages is not the issue. The defendant delivered to plaintiff's property to meet the contract. However, the defects in the property will be 1 year old and under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 474 does not apply.
Supreme Court in 3889/2548.
Watch accused the victim's house, number 7 to make sure her husband with the intent to sell and an agreement will be used. Time to check about 14 days if the defendant has decided not to inform the victim that night, I do not buy or watch the full 14 days to notify the victim and the defendant did not deliver the clock back. Constitutes the defendant agreed to buy the clock, 7 to buy a house as a result of age, according to Section 508 Allowance like to sell the defendant is obligated to pay to the victim. If a person fails to pay to correct the defendant in civil contracts for defendants who are guilty of misappropriation.
Supreme Court in 7318/2537.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Defendant's encroachment into the tenement building in the street where the defendant has agreed to a contract. With the plaintiff and the plan was advertised in the road, 2 m. If the facts as the plaintiff's claims. Actions of the defendant would be entitled to the plaintiff's argument, the plaintiff shall have the power to sue. Plaintiff and defendant entered into by that slogan. Therefore, the relationship is based on qualifying. The defendant is responsible for the sale of assets to meet the description.
Supreme Court in 1060/2541.
The plan annexed to the agreement to sell that house and land disputes. Townhouse and condominium projects. The road in front and rear. Street road sign in the front left is the house 7 rooms and 7 rooms right next to the house to the pool and courtyard area of the sky. The condominium building located adjacent to the road in the back. And the plaintiff agreed to buy a townhouse hotel bed. 7 that the color yellow, which is near the pool of defendants on the map. Indicates location of town houses to be constructed under the project's offerings. The defendant has sky-ground pool. The condo is located in an elegant, beautiful to live. Not isolated as an isolated house only 14 rooms is located opposite of each other, you'll see the difference that may not. Commensurate The defendant's construction of town houses alone, without a pool terrace. To fill the sky and condominium project that was advertised to be located. The house is built different, a different one. Unlike a townhouse located in Project released an ad to our clients. Held that a defendant's breach of contract, the plaintiff prefers to terminate the contract. Without regard to whether the pool and yard facilities are provided. Town house or not. The plaintiff is entitled to use such facilities or not. To do with differences in the ownership of their respective owners. Townhouse and condominium unit owners in any way And even had to split the project into two parts: a sub-project of the townhouse. And most of the projects. It does not make a project from the defendant to constitute breach of contract.
Supreme Court to 903/2539.
The plaintiff contracted to buy Cross Arm Agilent 1,100 pieces from the defendant's contract documents. Mon 1 Article 1 of the specification meets the Pacific, all applications submitted to the plaintiff. Sold by the company. Kang Cheng Thailand And 2 is that the vendor certifies that the products sold under the contract are not less than Defined as detailed in Article 1 and to the Pacific by an application attached. When the seller certifies that the laboratory must have a minimum quality requirements. And prior contracts with the plaintiff held the tender specifications and The quality of the tender when the defendant has already bid. According to the contract documents for the transaction includes the sale of 0.1. Conditions of the plaintiff in a bid to allow the plaintiff to sell. Therefore, detailed quality control before the end of the contract is just detail. It is not only the normal trading transactions as a seller. Must deliver the property to meet the trial and in this regard, there is no law. Age, otherwise it will be ten years under the Civil and Commercial Section. The new 164 or 193/30.
Supreme Court in 1486/2538.
The defendant will be published in daily newspapers for the sale of a condominium, the defendant is under construction, with illustrations. Condominium project and has prepared a letter to distribute to your guests. But when the plaintiff to request the purchase of the condominium units of the defendant. The two sides signed an agreement to buy luxury suites and as evidence that agreement. Map attached to the building are intended to show that the number and size of the unit only. Map does not lead to certification of any such agreement, the other end for a description of the plaintiff to purchase the unit price schedule for completion. Scheduled transfer. Rights and obligations of the plaintiff against the defendant for the same. The plaintiff and the defendant would be bound to sell the unit on contracts set aside for that purpose to be bound by the publication of a newspaper or letter of the defendant's non-trading unit, between the plaintiff and the defendant was not a trade description.
Supreme Court to 784/2537.
The tender notice, the creditor has given the product you are looking to buy. Characteristics of material to be used by the department of shares of restricted stock with a bid of B specifications to meet the buyer's credit limit. And the creditor agrees to purchase it. The transaction was an ordinary transaction arising from the proposal and to direct them to use as trade samples or by describing it. B. The Partnership does not deliver a product that is under contract with the quotation. And not as a creditor. The Partnership. It is an agreement. Creditors would be damaged. And are free to terminate the contract due to the two as the managing partner of Partnership. B. It shall refund the payment to creditors, plus interest.
Claims for refund of the purchase agreement does not break the law with age, especially Must be age 10 years.
Supreme Court in 1457/2526.
Spare parts contracts. Allow a plaintiff who monitor and test product quality. If it appears that the delivery of quality does not meet the sample. The list of specified contracts. Plaintiff reserves the right not to receive such goods as it is not an ordinary trading transactions by the description or the age of 10 years.
Supreme Court in 2762/2524.
The sale will buy Kaitamcmprrnna. When the transaction by the buyer that the subtitle to the identity and The quality of the product. The plaintiff offered one brand-pin, manufactured by the same manufacturer of the pin. Brands that had been used. This suggests that a similar standard as the only claim of the plaintiff's product, the advertising vendor. No details of the size that it is formally accepted as a sale by description.
The seller is not liable for defects in the property sale. That is later delivered. The buyer has no rights. Withhold the price unpaid.
Supreme Court in 1176/2524.
First, the defendant agreed to buy a copy of the plaintiff. The defendant tried to live up to a month to show that the defendant be tested for quality and performance of copiers and accessories. Copy is satisfied. If the defendant is not buying because they believe the plaintiff's description. Not a trade description.
