Section 815 If an agent wishes. The advances to be paid to the agent, the amount you need. The agents assigned to it.
Section 816 is in the preparation of a business which he entrusted to the agency that issued the advance payments or money spent. Which examines the case should be treated as a gem. That agent will be paid out of character. Including interest from the date of payment to the Administration.
If, in the preparation of their business which he entrusted to them. Agents have to bear any more debt. Which examines the case should be treated as a gem. That agent will call for the repayment of their time. If it's time to pay the debt. To provide reasonable assurance of the time.
If, in the preparation of their business which he entrusted to them. As a result, the agent must be one. It is not the fault of their own idols. He claims that the agent will be taken from the can.
Section 817 in the case of a pension agent, unless otherwise agreed by contract to ensure that the pension is paid when the agency has to end now.
Section 818 of the previous agent, the agent has made any unlawful in that section. That agency has no right to pension
Section 819 agency prefers to withhold any of the properties of which are in their possession because they represent that it has. Until you get the money owed to them because it represents.
Supreme Court in 4355/2548.
During consideration of the Court. The defendant filed a petition to the court summons Company. And I became a co-defendant. The lawsuit claims that the debt arising from the installation of wall plaster. Towing a trailer and put the cement wall that had to do with the plaintiff. Defendants are acting in behalf of the Company. And I hire a personal defendant is not liable to the plaintiff as the defendant's request to be eligible under the provisions Civil Procedure Code Section 57 (3) (a) as shall understand that. The court summons the parties to the lawsuit by claiming that If the court ruled that the defendant loses a case by case. Defendants are sued on behalf of Company. And which I used to have recourse.
Supreme Court in 5388/2545.
Appointed for capital defendants. Is trading on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. It is a promising agent for the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 797 legal relationship between a company's capital. The defendant is found for the company's capital. Trader in the business of the defendant do not in any way. The company's capital. Must comply with the orders of the accused, which acts as an agent in the business of the defendant and the plaintiff sued for the money to finance companies. Advances to the defendant. It is represented that the money paid in advance of a business delegation. The identity of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 816 of the first paragraph, in which case no such law, statute or otherwise. The age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 is not the case that the plaintiff was engaged in the business of the defendant or the defendant's case, the plaintiff's job was not in force under the Civil and Commercial Section. 193/34 (7) and 2-year-old defendant to the plaintiff for payment of the September 19, 2540 until the lawsuit was not filed for 10 years, so it does not terminate the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 991/2545.
The defendant made the plaintiff's agent in trading ties between the plaintiff and the defendant is bound in As a principal agent, which has no specific law on the statute. The age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of the defendant ordered the plaintiff to sell the 10,000 shares to 20,000 shares, however, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant money to buy all the money the defendant received. for over two hundred thousand pieces of it. The case that the defendant pay the plaintiff on behalf of the defendant beyond the amount that the defendant ordered the defendant to sell the excess to be refunded with interest at a rate of 7.5 percent per year from the date of default as to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 2986/2537.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Plaintiff, the defendant is assigned to the dealer. The defendant sold the plaintiff did not deliver the goods to the plaintiff deposits a claim that the defendants sold the property on behalf of itself and then not deliver them to him. Which the plaintiff. A breach of contract agents and describe the request. Ask the court to compel the defendant to pay that amount plus interest by the plaintiff. Proof of purchase and letter of the defendant's orders. And accept a sale to the plaintiff sued the defendant did not obscure Plaintiff, the defendant appointed the plaintiff as a dealer in machinery. The defendant has introduced the buyer about the machinery properly. Ensuring all equipment is checked before using the machine. And will be responsible for providing after-sale service contracts. The defendant was an agent of the plaintiff is not a broker. Defendant must deliver the deposit to the plaintiff, the principal When the defendant did not deliver, it must pay interest to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 811 on contract terms as a representative. Price the agent will offer to buy it. Must not be higher than the list price at the dealer. Therefore, selling overpriced products to our customers. And not send the deposit to the plaintiff, the principal It is the agent for the wrongful act. Agents are not entitled to pension in this section.
Supreme Court to 175/2529.
The plaintiff has paid the amounts due to the defendant as an agent to purchase shares in the stock market. The defendant which the plaintiff would have The right to withhold those who still share. In the possession of the plaintiff until the defendant pay the plaintiff the defendant's due out in accordance with Section 241 244 and 819. Trading in the stock market, which should be followed up. IDPs market. Of Thailand is not allowing the plaintiff to The right to withhold . Civil and Commercial Code in any way to do so when the plaintiff has The right to withhold share. Which are the property of the defendant by the plaintiff as creditor insurance. Bankruptcy Act, Section 6 of the indictment to the defendant and the plaintiff's failure to comply with the Bankruptcy Act, Section 10 (2) by the defendant in a lawsuit that would bankrupt the defendant. The defendant's waiver of its creditors or the appraisal of such shares in a filing with the City. If not, then the plaintiff's lawsuit would be filed with the court not to be considered.
Section 816 is in the preparation of a business which he entrusted to the agency that issued the advance payments or money spent. Which examines the case should be treated as a gem. That agent will be paid out of character. Including interest from the date of payment to the Administration.
If, in the preparation of their business which he entrusted to them. Agents have to bear any more debt. Which examines the case should be treated as a gem. That agent will call for the repayment of their time. If it's time to pay the debt. To provide reasonable assurance of the time.
If, in the preparation of their business which he entrusted to them. As a result, the agent must be one. It is not the fault of their own idols. He claims that the agent will be taken from the can.
Section 817 in the case of a pension agent, unless otherwise agreed by contract to ensure that the pension is paid when the agency has to end now.
Section 818 of the previous agent, the agent has made any unlawful in that section. That agency has no right to pension
Section 819 agency prefers to withhold any of the properties of which are in their possession because they represent that it has. Until you get the money owed to them because it represents.
Supreme Court in 4355/2548.
During consideration of the Court. The defendant filed a petition to the court summons Company. And I became a co-defendant. The lawsuit claims that the debt arising from the installation of wall plaster. Towing a trailer and put the cement wall that had to do with the plaintiff. Defendants are acting in behalf of the Company. And I hire a personal defendant is not liable to the plaintiff as the defendant's request to be eligible under the provisions Civil Procedure Code Section 57 (3) (a) as shall understand that. The court summons the parties to the lawsuit by claiming that If the court ruled that the defendant loses a case by case. Defendants are sued on behalf of Company. And which I used to have recourse.
Supreme Court in 5388/2545.
Appointed for capital defendants. Is trading on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. It is a promising agent for the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 797 legal relationship between a company's capital. The defendant is found for the company's capital. Trader in the business of the defendant do not in any way. The company's capital. Must comply with the orders of the accused, which acts as an agent in the business of the defendant and the plaintiff sued for the money to finance companies. Advances to the defendant. It is represented that the money paid in advance of a business delegation. The identity of the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 816 of the first paragraph, in which case no such law, statute or otherwise. The age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Section 193/30 is not the case that the plaintiff was engaged in the business of the defendant or the defendant's case, the plaintiff's job was not in force under the Civil and Commercial Section. 193/34 (7) and 2-year-old defendant to the plaintiff for payment of the September 19, 2540 until the lawsuit was not filed for 10 years, so it does not terminate the plaintiff.
Supreme Court to 991/2545.
The defendant made the plaintiff's agent in trading ties between the plaintiff and the defendant is bound in As a principal agent, which has no specific law on the statute. The age of 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 of the defendant ordered the plaintiff to sell the 10,000 shares to 20,000 shares, however, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant money to buy all the money the defendant received. for over two hundred thousand pieces of it. The case that the defendant pay the plaintiff on behalf of the defendant beyond the amount that the defendant ordered the defendant to sell the excess to be refunded with interest at a rate of 7.5 percent per year from the date of default as to the plaintiff.
Supreme Court in 2986/2537.
The plaintiff sued the lecture. Plaintiff, the defendant is assigned to the dealer. The defendant sold the plaintiff did not deliver the goods to the plaintiff deposits a claim that the defendants sold the property on behalf of itself and then not deliver them to him. Which the plaintiff. A breach of contract agents and describe the request. Ask the court to compel the defendant to pay that amount plus interest by the plaintiff. Proof of purchase and letter of the defendant's orders. And accept a sale to the plaintiff sued the defendant did not obscure Plaintiff, the defendant appointed the plaintiff as a dealer in machinery. The defendant has introduced the buyer about the machinery properly. Ensuring all equipment is checked before using the machine. And will be responsible for providing after-sale service contracts. The defendant was an agent of the plaintiff is not a broker. Defendant must deliver the deposit to the plaintiff, the principal When the defendant did not deliver, it must pay interest to the plaintiff under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 811 on contract terms as a representative. Price the agent will offer to buy it. Must not be higher than the list price at the dealer. Therefore, selling overpriced products to our customers. And not send the deposit to the plaintiff, the principal It is the agent for the wrongful act. Agents are not entitled to pension in this section.
Supreme Court to 175/2529.
The plaintiff has paid the amounts due to the defendant as an agent to purchase shares in the stock market. The defendant which the plaintiff would have The right to withhold those who still share. In the possession of the plaintiff until the defendant pay the plaintiff the defendant's due out in accordance with Section 241 244 and 819. Trading in the stock market, which should be followed up. IDPs market. Of Thailand is not allowing the plaintiff to The right to withhold . Civil and Commercial Code in any way to do so when the plaintiff has The right to withhold share. Which are the property of the defendant by the plaintiff as creditor insurance. Bankruptcy Act, Section 6 of the indictment to the defendant and the plaintiff's failure to comply with the Bankruptcy Act, Section 10 (2) by the defendant in a lawsuit that would bankrupt the defendant. The defendant's waiver of its creditors or the appraisal of such shares in a filing with the City. If not, then the plaintiff's lawsuit would be filed with the court not to be considered.
