Promissory note

Section 982 of the promissory note. Is a book of instruments, which one person Called the ticket issuer Make a pledge to spend a certain amount on another person or use it on another person's order. Called payee

Section 983 promissory note There must be a list of the following.
(1) the name is a promissory note.
(2) Unconditional commitment to use a certain amount of money.
(3) due date
(4) Where to spend money
(5) the name or brand of the payee;
(6) Date and place of promissory note.
(7) the issuer's signature.

Section 984 of the instrument which contains a deficiency from the preceding clause. It is not a promissory note. Except in the case of the following:

Promissory notes which do not specify the time of use. You are considered Use money when you see.

If the place of the money is not stated in the promissory note. You will have the domicile of the issuer as a place to use the money.

If the promissory note does not specify the place of issuance. You are considered The ticket is issued at the domicile of the issuer.

If not, issue a ticket. He who is lawful, in good faith, will write down the correct date.

Section 985. The provisions in Chapter 2 on bills of exchange shall be as follows. You are required to raise the amount of the promissory note only as not contrary to the condition of this instrument is Section 911, 913, 916, 917, 919, 920, 922 to 926, 938 to 947, 949, 950, 954 to 959, 967 to 971

If it is a promissory note issued abroad. You hereby apply the following provisions: Articles 960 to 964, 973, 974

Section 986 issuers of promissory notes are bound to be the same as those issued with bills of exchange.

Promissory notes, which will be used at a certain time after seeing them. Must be submitted to the issuer to recognize within the time limit prescribed in Section 928. This deadline is from the date of receipt, which is signed by the issuer. If the issuer refuses to recognize and date. He refuses to do this as evidence against the objection. The date of the objection is considered as the starting date for counting the time.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3488/2557.
The plaintiff has promissory note in the possession of the plaintiff because the promissory note back to the plaintiff because the plaintiff used the money to promissory note to the company. The plaintiff is the legal tender. Even the plaintiff will receive the transfer of promissory notes and money to the company after the Ministry of Finance ordered the plaintiff to suspend the operation. But the plaintiff's attorney at the plaintiff. After the Ministry of Finance ordered the plaintiff to suspend the operation. Financial Institution Reform Organization Appoints Speaker of the Board of the Plaintiff This is done by the Financial Institution Reform Commission under Section 30 of the Financial Sector Reform Act BE 2540 (1997), and the Financial Sector Restructuring Authority The plaintiff's chairman shall adhere to the interest of the debtor of the plaintiff. The operation of the plaintiff after the Ministry of Finance ordered to suspend the operation, it is entered into by the Financial Sector Restructuring Authority The business of the plaintiff is not a violation of the Ministry of Finance.

Order the Ministry of Finance to suspend the operation of the business. The order is applicable to the plaintiff, especially not applicable to the general public. The plaintiff's action is between the plaintiff and the company and the Ministry of Finance will have to complain. The impact on the status of the seller, reduce the bills of the defendant and the status of the issuer of the second defendant, in other words. To make a contract to reduce bills between the plaintiff and the defendant 1 or promissory notes that the second defendant to issue or suspend the ticket. I do not know that the transfer of promissory notes between the plaintiff and the company is up with the plagiarism. The plaintiff sued the plaintiff in good faith, so when the promissory note to the defendants 1 and 2 do not use the ticket. The plaintiff has the power to sue the first and second defendants to pay the promissory note.

Sale agreement to reduce the bill if the defendant defaulted 1 defendant, the defendant to default interest payment at the maximum rate prescribed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims to submit the Bank of Thailand's interest rates on loans and discounts. And the interest charged to good customers of the plaintiff. And the book for the reform of the financial system. It shows that while the defendant is wrong to sell bills. The plaintiff has the right to default interest at the rate of 21 percent per year, which is not exceeding the maximum interest rate announced by the plaintiff, the defendant is liable to pay the interest to the plaintiff.

The defendant did not write a message to call for interest, but the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 968 (2), Section 985 provides the right to claim interest at the rate of 5 percent per year, although the plaintiff will not be petitioned. But this is a problem of public peace. The Supreme Court ruled in accordance with the Civil Code Section 142 (5), with Section 246 and 247.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3782/2556.
Contract for the guarantee of the defendant and the defendant a pledge of a pledge to the plaintiff to the plaintiff to the plaintiff. Although the first debt under the memorandum that the defendant will have to pay to the plaintiff on May 16, 2001 is still not finalized, it has the obligation as avalue promissory note to pay the debt to the plaintiff. If the defendant 1 default and even if the defendant will default after the death. Aval promissory note has not been terminated because the Aval promissory note passed. The liability as Aval promissory note is inherited to the heirs of the road, so the defendants 3, 5 and 6 as the heirs of the road to the defendant must be jointly liable to the defendant to pay the debt to the plaintiff. But the defendants 3, 5 and 6 must be jointly liable to the defendant no more than the estate of the defendants 3, 5 and 6 received from the inheritance of Section 1601

Judgment of the Supreme Court 6292/2555.
Promissory note is a promissory note on demand when it is not so when the plaintiff has demanded that the defendant pay the money and the defendant does not pay the plaintiff will have the power to sue the defendant liability under the promissory note. To find the promissory note to be filed with the defendant to pay before the defendant.

The promissory note is stating that. Defendants pay interest at the rate of 16 percent per year, whether the defendant will default or not. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest from the defendant at a rate of 16 percent per annum under the contract already. The interest rate agreement is not a penalties. Only interest that exceeds 16 percent per annum will be penalized. If the court finds that the excess of 16 percent per year is too high, the court will reduce it to a reasonable amount. It will be reduced to or less than 16 percent per year.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 3075/2552.
Promissory note with promissory note promissory note with consistent message. Front of promissory note The price is pledge and the third defendant signed. The promissory note promissory note also contains a list of promissory notes that are pledged together. Show that the third defendant brought the promissory note pledged to the Securities and Securities Company under the promissory note promissory note. The third defendant signed the pledge. It is not the case that the third defendant endorsed the transfer of the promissory note to the SEC Securities and Commerce, the defendant's third action is to use only the base is the endorsement of the agent under Section 926 paragraph. Section 985 is not a endorser who is liable for the endorsement of the money to the plaintiff.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1783/2551.
Promissory note And issuers charge interest at the rate of 16 percent per year is an agreement under Section 911, 968 (1) contains Section 985, which the law does not place any restrictions, so the parties will agree. It is not a loan according to the definition. The interest rate charged in the interest rate specified in the promissory note at the rate of 16 percent per year is not to be charged interest in excess of the rate of the offense. Prohibited under Section 654 promissory note and interest under the promissory note is not void.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 8328/2550.
Promissory note for sale of promissory notes to the defendant as a guarantor to accept. The debtor is a separate contract from the promissory note issued to the plaintiff to the plaintiff. The defendant's liability as a guarantor of promissory notes for sale. Send out the goods It is not mandatory to comply with the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 985, Section 941 to force the person to bring a promissory note to be filed to spend money on the due date.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 815/2550.
When Bank A. As Aval has spent money on promissory notes to the Treasury Department, then the Bank of Thailand will have the right to recourse to the debtor, who is a person who is insured under the Section. 940, paragraph three, contains Section 985, and in the absence of specific law. So it is 10 years under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 193/30 when the creditor has been transferred the right to claim aval promissory note. Creditors will also have the right to demand repayment within the above age when the creditors submit applications for debt repayment Aval promissory note to the owner. The creditor does not exceed 10 years.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 405/2550.
Debt under promissory note The date the defendant, the issuer of the promissory note, promised to use the money to the plaintiff. It is indefinite that the calendar day. Is on a date specified in the promissory note. When the defendant and the first defendant did not pay the promissory note, the defendant was immediately the default. Without notice under Section 204 paragraph two, even Section 985 shall require Section 941 of the Bill of Exchange shall apply to the promissory note as well. It must be used as far as the condition of the promissory note. The provisions in the promissory note. Promissory notes must be issued to the issuer. Or promissory notes, which will be used at a certain time after seeing only that, under Section 986, paragraph two, when the promissory note is a ticket with a clear date of use. Is not in force. Section 986, paragraph two, the plaintiff is not required to bring promissory notes filed under Section 941 again.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 4714/2547.
Section 899 states that "any text not provided for in this Code If written into bills. You do not find that message to any effect on the bill "is a general provision applicable to bills of exchange. Promissory notes and checks, Section 915 states that "Any payer and any endorser shall write down the following expressly and expressly the same: (1) the terms of limitation or limitation of their liability to the Bills ?, which is a provision in the bill of exchange is not provided in the general chapter. As with Section 899 and Section 985, the provisions in the promissory note do not require Section 915 to apply to promissory notes. So the third defendant endorsed the promissory note. The endorsement of the endorsement is not against the text is contrary to Section 983 (2). Effective for promissory notes under Section 899, the third defendant is liable under the promissory note.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2752/2540.
According to the Civil and Commercial Code, 3 separate contract does not stipulate how to sell promissory notes, specifically, Agreed between the plaintiff and the defendant, there is no law prohibiting the sale of promissory notes to pay the plaintiffs to file a claim under the terms of the contract is called. Promissory note sale And the agreement is not expressly prohibited by law. In this case, even the issuer of the promissory note, the promissory note is enforceable. Defendant is bound to be liable under the contract.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 5328/2537.
The Civil and Commercial Code, Section 985, first paragraph does not provide for Section 928 of the Bill of Exchange shall apply to promissory notes as well. Section 928 shall apply to promissory notes only in the case under Section 986, paragraph two, provided. that Promissory notes to be used at a certain time after seeing Section 913 (4), who must submit to the issuer to recognize the receipt to certify the payment within the time. As stated in Section 928, when a promissory note is a promissory note, the money will be used when asked under section 913 (3). The provisions on promissory notes are not mandatory in the case of tickets. The money will be used at the end of the specified period. The promissory notes that are used to make money on demand have meaning and effect. Compulsory with the promissory note when so seen. The plaintiff, the promissory note, falls under the provisions of Section 944, consisting of Section 985, the first paragraph shall be filed for payment within six months from the date of entry into the ticket. So if the lawsuit is heard. The plaintiff has a claim to the defendant, the issuer of the promissory note, and the defendant, avalanche 2, used to pay the ticket, then the two defendants do not pay. The plaintiff has the power to sue the two defendants to use the money. The law on age, the severity of the creditors, must be translated strictly. When the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1001. The case against the issuer of promissory notes. It is prohibited to sue three years after the date of the ticket to use such money, it means that three years from the date of issue of the ticket is not promissory note is a promissory note to use the money on demand. The date the plaintiff demanded. The two defendants to use the promissory note is September 4, 2528 is the start date to use the money before the date the plaintiff demanded the two defendants. There is no obligation to use the money in accordance with the promissory note. Only the plaintiff has the right to claim the money immediately and the defendant. Second, the right to pay immediately by the plaintiff does not have to call only in accordance with the general rule in Section 203, and on the last day of the Sunday, September 4, 1988, which is a holiday, it must count the date of commencement of work. Section 161. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit on September 5, 1988, so it is not over for three years. Plaintiff's case does not terminate.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2872/2537.
Even promissory notes will be issued to pay interest on the debt of the defendant. The plaintiff's debt before it. When the defendant issued a new promissory note repayment. The amount of the promissory note becomes a new debt and the money is gone. The plaintiff is entitled to charge interest on the amount of debt. Interest is not charged interest.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1042/2534.
When the promissory note to the plaintiff who did not bring the promissory note to the defendant at the domicile of the defendant to spend money on the ticket. Only a letter to the defendant promissory note, the plaintiff is not. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 985 contains Section 941 forced to hear that the defendant did not pledge to pay the promissory note to the plaintiff. Even then it appears that the plaintiff demanded that the defendant and the defendant did not pay the bill. It is the plaintiffs to conduct the debt. The plaintiff has no power to sue the defendant. 5 fight that the defendant is not liable to pay a check to the plaintiff because the plaintiff received a dispute by the plaintiff. Pledged fraud, the burden of proof to the defendant that 5 must be attested to the defendant as the defendant claims 5 when the dispute has come to the defendant that the fifth defendant is obliged to the defendant that the second breach of contract. The plaintiff has terminated the agreement to sell the shares and the plaintiff received the transfer of the dispute by knowing that the contract of sale. The shares between the defendant and the two defendants were dissolved when the defendant was unable to investigate the facts. The plaintiff did not receive the transfer of the dispute by plagiarizing the defendant, defendant 2, the defendant 5 is liable under the dispute as a payer.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 2053/2535.
The defendant's first promissory note to replace the first promissory note that the defendant issued to the plaintiff is not repayment of the first promissory note. The first promissory note has not been suspended because it has not yet been paid. But changed to a new promissory note, the defendant 2 to guarantee the repayment of the promissory notes issued by the defendant to the plaintiff in the amount of not more than 1,000,000 baht, not specified as promissory notes and do not specify the period. The agreement also guarantees that the guarantee will remain in effect. Until the bank denies the revocation of the loan. It shows that the defendant intended to guarantee the debt under the promissory note unlimited number of copies and unlimited. Time within the limit of not more than 1,000,000 baht, the defendant must be bound as the guarantor of the first defendant in the plaintiff to bring the case.

Judgment of the Supreme Court 1042/2534.
When the promissory note to the plaintiff who did not bring the promissory note to the defendant at the domicile of the defendant to spend money on the ticket. Only a letter to the defendant promissory note, the plaintiff is not. According to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 985 contains Section 941 forced to hear that the defendant did not pledge to pay the promissory note to the plaintiff. Even then it appears that the plaintiff demanded that the defendant and the defendant did not pay the bill. It is the plaintiffs to conduct the debt. The plaintiff has no power to sue the defendant. 5 fight that the defendant is not liable to pay a check to the plaintiff because the plaintiff received a dispute by the plaintiff. Pledged fraud, the burden of proof to the defendant that 5 must be attested to the defendant as the defendant claims 5 when the dispute has come to the defendant that the fifth defendant is obliged to the defendant that the second breach of contract. The plaintiff has terminated the agreement to sell the shares and the plaintiff received the transfer of the dispute by knowing that the contract of sale. The shares between the defendant and the two defendants were dissolved when the defendant was unable to investigate the facts. The plaintiff did not receive the transfer of the dispute by plagiarizing the defendant, defendant 2, the defendant 5 is liable under the dispute as a payer.

Draft book.

Section 975 of the draft. In addition to that payable to the bearer. Copy needs to go out as two or more together may also be removed.

Copy these are meant to keep order in the instrument itself. Otherwise, each would Coeฉik available as a separate bill to the bill as well.

Every person who was ever a bill does not specify that a single will. Coeฉik called to deliver two or more of their time. They were able to take charge of their own. In this regard, the need to correct to endorse the person next to her. And endorse the need to help people who admonition to those who endorse the. The next sequel to this at all until late payer. In addition, the endorsement will be required to write their endorsement is the same in Copy the new deck to the other.

Section 976 the bill is endorsed Copy deck of two or more individuals who provide it. You know who would be liable under such Copy all the endorsements and all the people who would be liable under its own Copy carved into it. Just like that Copy that is separate from the bills together.

Section 977 if two or more Copy in the deck is transferred to another owner. Each person is lawfully gem. Between those who are. One is a priority. He considered that the true owner of the bills, but nothing in this Section shall not wounding the rights of persons who are lawfully Used to endorse or to which they submit to their Coeฉik before.

Section 978 certified to be written into any Copy. And must be written to only one Copy only.

It pays to get a certification. Copy and reassuring as it falls to the person who is lawfully gem. He is the payer will be liable under the Copy virtually every document the differences that separate the two bills.

Section 979 if the acceptance of bills, which are set to spend the money without requiring the transmission. Copy to provide a guarantee of their identity and in the bills are due. Copy get them to fall into the hands of people who, by law, any one gem. You certify that the holder will be liable to the Coeฉik.

Section 980 provisions in them, which says it is. If any of the bills Copy is set to escape with the money or Respect to one another. That bill would also set out to do.

Section 981 agreements which Copy the one he accepted. Written statement to the other Copy to those that are on hand or a profit. The person would need to take to the lawful owner of the Copy another.

If that person refuses to disown. You know who will take recourse is not made until the objection is to specify the following.

(1) that Copy sent to the certification. He did not take to it on demand.

(2) that he can not be accepted or used by the other Copy.

Recourse because he was not sustaining minor. Or use the money.

Section 959 the bill will have recourse to those who endorse Payer, and others that it was liable under the bill.
A) Recourse when bills are due, if not used.
B) recourse, even if the bills are due in the following cases will be discussed.
(1) If they reject it, accepting bills.
(2) if the payment will be accepted or not. I went bankrupt. Or to refrain from piling up. Even if a debt waiver will not be sentenced as evidence. Or if the detention and confiscation of the money was fruitless.
(3) If the bills are not payable to any one of them went bankrupt.

Section 960 of the exchange of money or lack of it. As evidenced by the need to make a mess with one document. Called on the opposition.

This objection does not apply to funds in which it will use the money. One day, or within three days, but then go.

The objection is not guaranteed to be made within the time limit prescribed. For the submission of bills was approved. Or within three days, but then go.

When an objection is not accepted, then it shall not apply to the use of funds. And do not object to the use of funds.

In the case of those that are mentioned in Section 959 (b) (2) You know who also might have recourse. Until they have filed bills to pay the money and has made an objection to it.

In many cases, such as Section 959 (b) (3) that if they sentenced him to order the payment of which is shown below. Are sufficient to allow the holder to exercise the recourse.

Section 961 objection to the sheriff. Or deputy sheriff. The lawyer who allowed this to be done.

Minister of Justice to issue regulations to implement the provisions of this Code. And the licensing and the opposition. Including the rate relating to the court fees.

Section 962 of the objection to the name, position and signature of the authority. Copies of bills for all items must be endorsed with the word personal statement indicating the volume is. The following.
(1) Name or brand of the person objected to and condemned.
(2) any information or to make a statement against the bill. The call and response, if any. Or that a person pays or not to be found.
(3) If the certificate. Or use the money to fix this. To discuss the nature of the face and the name or brand of certified or users. Money to fix his face and name of the person's face it.
(4) place and date of the objection.

Who made the objection for objection to the request to do so. The objection was made to give notice of opposition to the objection. If the residence is to be sent by registered mail postage. Or delivered to the domicile of that. I do not know the country is close to where a copy of the objection can be easily seen at the local District Office and who condemned the resident's back.

Section 963 shall be given notice that he does not endorse the bill or not. Money on his endorsement to both the payer and within four days. Per day of protest. Or the date of the ticket in case of a requirement that "Does not have an objection."

The endorsement of all people need to give notice to the person next to her endorsement to two days. You notice that they receive. Take notice of the names and agencies who have given notice before any such order to do this together until the payer. The time limit is mentioned. But when you count the one I've told people before.

If the Bureau does not endorse any one of their better. Or states, but not the good. I notice that you'll have to endorse anyone before, it shall be enough.

A person must give notice. Will notice that there is an even exchange, but by night it is sent. The need to prove that the notice within the time prescribed.

If you notice, in writing, registered mail. If the letter is mailed within the above gem. The notice shall be deemed to have been delivered within the time limit is enforced.

Any person who fails to give notice within the limited time that such a recourse is not to be liable for any damage caused by the negligence of its own. But shall not exceed the amount of compensation in exchange.

Section 964 is written to that specification. "Need not have any objection" from "no objection" from or in any other case like that better. Payer or the endorsement will not relieve the holder of the objection is not certified or do not cash it. So they will have recourse.

This requirement. He would not release them from duty to submit the bills within the time prescribed. The duty to provide notice of bills, lack of trust to endorse anyone before. The duty payable or not attest to comply with the prescribed time limit will fall to the person who sought to take on those who are against the bill.

This requirement. If the order is written to it. It is with the counterparty to all those who had signed the bill. If both requirements are then. He also oppose the objection gem. You know who must pay for it. If the requirements for a written endorsement. If the objection is made soon. That cost may be a valid objection from other parties who have signed the bill.

Section 965 of the bills in the country. If the money saved in the draft as a repudiation does not endorse or reject the money, both dated and signed by you as an objection, it shall be. No need to do and who have given notice to the person whom the lack of trust. Intention to recourse within four days from the day he did not reject the certification.

Section 966 notice the lack of reliability is not guaranteed or your money is a must have item. On the bill. Name or brand of the payer and the payer. Amount to be spent on bills. The holder's name or brands, and Bill. The opposition or the date of repudiation does not endorse any money. With the message that he is not certified or do not use that money bills.

Section 967 of the bill. I endorse it payable to those who endorse it, or guarantee by aval it. Shall be jointly liable to the holder.

He shall have the right to remove admonish them individually or all together, they are required by the order in which they were not binding.

The same. Every person who shall have to sign the bill and then take notes. In order to apply it to those who have already committed themselves.

Admonition to the parties took part. Which shall not be liable to admonish Tadhntag out to others even if both parties would be in the correct order, the person who took it.

Section 968 who will claim the money from a person whom he is the right of recourse.
(1) the amount of money which he does not approve or does not apply to the interest. If there is a requirement that the interest
(2) interest rate of five percent per year from the date due.
(3) the cost of the objection. And to give notice to the endorsement of the holder next to her, and payer. And other expenses.
(4) for which no fee was agreed. You think of one sixth of the money will be used by the bills. And whether the case is. You shall not charge rates higher than this.
If the right of recourse before maturity. You to deduct the amount of bills down to five percent.

Section 969 which held a party and the bidding could be called out from his contract which he is liable.

(1) the full amount of money which they used to.
(2) interest on that amount. Rate of five percent per year from the date of the fund.
(3) other expenses that they have to go out.
(4) is drawn off from the amount of money in bills of exchange as defined in Section § 968 (4).

Section 970 agreements which all parties shall be recourse or a recourse to them. May be used to call him to take their bills to the objection and accounting for the money, too.

The endorsing anyone who holds it and honor it. To cross out the endorsement of its own and of those who endorsed it after they lose it.

Section 971 and ordered to pay it. All of it. The man before endorsing it. He endorsed the draft or transfer to another one of those chips. I have the right to take recourse to the party of which he would be liable under the bill, he already has not.

Section 972 in the event of recourse to the approved part. That party has spent a number of them do not endorse it. May be called to indicate that taking into account the receipt of the bills and called to her. In addition, the bill requires that a certified copy of the bill is correct to the party and the opposition as well. So that he can have recourse in the future.

Section 973 on schedule, which is said to have been the Lewgpgn.
(1) deadline for filing a bill to spend money on it. In later years one has seen.
(2) the period for making objections to non-recognition or non-use of funds.
(3) The deadline for applying to the fund. In the case of a requirement that "Does not have an objection."
You know who would be entitled to take recourse to these other parties endorsing the payer and the person liable. Unless the certification.

Incidentally, if he fails to submit the bill to provide certification within the time limited as specified payer. You know who would lose their right to recourse to the fact that he did not take the money and he does not endorse any of the terms that Payer refers only to detach themselves from the insurance certificate.

The regulations limit the time the bill has to be endorsed. Only endorsed him but would only be taken advantage of the provision.

Section 974 of the bill better. Objection to it. If for some reason which is not necessarily violate the do not obstruct the due date. For the gem. You have to extend the deadline further.

Necessity, which is not bad as they violate them. Who has the endorsement given to the person next to them without delay. The notice shall be specified in the bill. Or identification card to be dated and signed by the holder other than those mentioned. You to enforce the provisions of Section 963.

When necessary, it may violate the end it was down. He must give his approval or payment of bills without delay. If an objection is made up.

If necessary, which is not to violate them. Continue to exist as more than thirty days after bills are due soon. You have the right to any recourse. And if so, to submit bills from. Objection to it. Shall not be required to do so.

The types of bills that spend money on it. Or spend time one could see it later. The thirty day like that recently. You from the day the Lord has given notice which is not necessary to violate. Those who endorse it to the next. Although the deadline for bills to pass. It is treated as such.

Supreme Court in 1783/2551.
The issuance of promissory notes. And its 16 percent interest rate per annum as agreed by Section 911, 968 (1) of Section 985, the law does not place any restrictions on the parties may agree. It is not a loan within the meaning of Act not to exceed the rate of interest at the rate specified in the promissory note at 16 percent per year, it's not the case, the interest rate which would be an offense under the Act and do not require. prohibited by Section 654, according to promissory notes and interest to sue is not void.

Supreme Court in 2569/2551.
R. companies to sell the disputed checks signed by the plaintiff by the endorsement. The plaintiff, who by law. When the bank refused to cash the check. Defendants who are ordered to pay, and Rama, who have endorsed a common liability to the plaintiff under Section 914 and Section 967 and Section 989 of the first paragraph shall be considered as a debtor to do so when the plaintiff. compromise agreement, which is regarded as one of the new debt the plaintiff would be entitled to claim payment for their companies, according to Rama, the compromise agreement. No right to call the company liable for the debt, according to Rama in one settlement. The plaintiff's right to claim against the defendant as a liability to the plaintiff in order to pay them. Debt settlement will put an end to the check. This is because the debt-claim in the case of the plaintiff in a settlement to end.

Supreme Court in 6054/2550.
The Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited (), which pays the bills were signed in, it is certified under Section 927 must be bound to pay the amount certified by the certification body of their compliance. Section 937 of the debtor and the one with the defendant, one of which is payable to the defendant that one is not in a position to be committed before the Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited () under Section 967, paragraph three, so when the Bank of Thailand. Ltd. (PCL) has been paid to the company, Toyota Motor (Thailand) Ltd., which is the honoring of 92 copies to the Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited () is the recourse that the defendant is one who commands. can not afford it. When there is no recourse then. Thai Military Bank Public Company Limited (), it shall have no claim to be transferred to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the defendant has no power in this case is a problem with the power to sue is an issue relating to public order. Even during the discretion of the court. Both defendants waived the issue to this dispute. The two defendants were entitled to raise claims in the appeal under section 225 paragraph two Civil Procedure Code.

Supreme Court in 5477/2550.
Civil Procedure Code Section 4 (1) states that the indictment be presented to the court that the defendant is domiciled in the district court. Or to the court that the case was in court that the defendant is domiciled, in accordance with the provisions of the criminal cycle, or the means to cause the carriage as the source of the plaintiff's argument that the right to sue. According to the complaint of the plaintiff that the defendant ordered to pay out a district, as the case proceeds to reimburse the District has purchased land to the defendant the amount of 140,000 Baht to the district, such as the date when the check payable to Nam. to billing. But the bank refuses to pay the check, even as I was the victim, while in case the bank refuses to pay. Whether the plaintiff was not injured. But when I said I was transferred to the plaintiff in the dispute. By endorsing the settlement check and deliver to the plaintiff. He and the plaintiff shall be entitled to the same district, in order to enforce against the defendant who has already committed before the third paragraph under Section 967 and Section 989, first paragraph, the plaintiff has sued the defendants. the payer to pay the plaintiff a check. The liability of the defendants in the dispute occurred when the bank refuses to pay the place where the check was refused to pay the carriage is indeed the place where born. When the bank refuses to pay the check is in the jurisdiction of the Court. It held that the case was in court. Plaintiff's complaint, the Court has power to all the provisions of that law.

Supreme Court in 4789/2549.
Promissory notes issued by the specified date is September 30, 2540 maturity date of October 31, 2540 using the interest rate per annum BBL MOR +1 on the promissory note the defendant is required to charge interest. And does not specify that the interest from any So the interest rate specified in the promissory note from the date of the ticket, according to Section 911, 968, 985 on October 31, 2540 to date, a defendant does not pay the bills. Shall be deemed to constitute a default by the defendant upon the second paragraph of Section 204 by a creditor does not require prior notice or demand whatsoever. When an assignment of this claim to the plaintiff. Behalf of the plaintiff as assignee of the original creditor has a claim for the value. All existing debt as well as debt of the two defendants.

Supreme Court in 4264/2548.
Check the documentation changed. Cheques made payable to the plaintiff when the defendant does not indicate that the plaintiff in a position to pay. B. The plaintiff is the trustee of the plaintiff as a holder in accordance with the law. When the bank refused to cash the check. As a check by the plaintiff who is injured and has the power to sue on behalf of the plaintiff. Himself without a suffix to the name of the plaintiff as trustee in the case of B. However, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants described checks payable to the plaintiff to pay the debt. Compromise agreement documents filed at the number 1 and 2, which is considered the documents filed as part of a lawsuit. The compromise agreement stated that the defendant sued for payment by check. The plaintiff as the plaintiff is a trustee of the B is considered the plaintiff sued as trustee under the compromise agreement. Attached to the lawsuit as well.

Supreme Court in 7988/2542.
The plaintiff sued the defendants and ordered to pay in exchange for a cash settlement from the plaintiff, but the facts. I agree that both plaintiff and defendant in exchange for money to each other. Fresh from a third party check made payable to the plaintiff by the defendant in the billing. Paid by check, payable to the plaintiff in any way. Thus, the defendant disputed the check to the plaintiff was not an issue for According to the lawsuit in exchange for cash from the plaintiff. The plaintiff, who was not checked by law. I will check out the dispute form and they are in possession of the plaintiff. However, as the holder of the check holder would need to be checked into the hold. Is to do well. When the plaintiff is not a full check by the law. The plaintiff has no right to sue to force the two defendants dispute liability in the plaintiff.

Supreme Court in 7336/2540.
The plaintiff sued the defendant is liable for the debt under the loan or sell the promissory notes. Payment made to the plaintiff. Without action, the defendants are liable for the debt under the promissory note. The defendant asked the court to the defendants, as the issue became a co-defendant. Defendants have denied liability for the fight to be paid by the defendant, the case is a dispute about the debt, according to promissory notes.

The defendants disputed the bank issued promissory notes of the plaintiff to the defendant by aval District is committed to spending bills at the bank by the plaintiff before the date of the next province to be used. The defendant has brought the Bills to a contract for the sale to repay debt. The agreement, if the plaintiff bank in May, according to the bill. Defendant to plead guilty, pay at the rate of 15 percent per year, plus interest to the plaintiff on the promissory notes did not dispute plaintiff's bill. It is because the Court ordered a temporary freeze in case another request. Any of the defendants. The defendant's breach of contract to sell the promissory notes to plaintiff. The defendant shall be liable to pay the disputed bills with interest rates of 15 percent per year under contract to the plaintiff.

Promissory note dispute to the plaintiff if the defendant is aval for promissory notes, payment settlement to the plaintiff, as agreed upon. In the sale of promissory notes. Promissory note dispute that the defendant would have been in possession as the payee and The ticket holder has the right to claim money from the plaintiff and the defendant joined the aval. The issue was also the case when the court sentenced the defendant to pay the promissory notes. Cash settlement to the plaintiff and the case is finally gone. It is money paid to the defendant to the plaintiff under the sale of promissory notes. Obligations under the promissory note, which is the case for the defendant and plaintiff. Take recourse to remove the defendants 1 and 2, under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 940 shall be filed since the date of filing forward. The defendant did not have to pay to the plaintiff's case notes. Interest before the filing of the agreement to sell the promissory notes. When the defendant's breach of contract, bills of sale. The defendant is still liable to pay to the plaintiff. The defendants are liable to pay the bills from the dispute to the plaintiff. Today is the day that the plaintiff can sue, which is considered a right of recourse. So before you sue a defendant's interest is not liable to pay to the plaintiff.

Promissory note dispute is not a matter of interest. The promissory note interest rate. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 968 (2) Section 985 shall have recourse only a 5 percent interest per annum for the two lower courts ruled that the defendants issued a promissory note and Liable for the debt, promissory note interest rate of 7.5 percent per year, it is not lawful. Even if the defendant does not appeal to the Supreme Court But this is about the power to sue, a legal issue arises. With public order. Supreme Court lifted a correct diagnosis and correct the execution. The Civil Section 142

the Supreme Court to 64/2537.
The plaintiff is licensed by the Ministry of Finance to fund the business. While the plaintiff by the defendant borrowed money from bank notes to the plaintiff. Thailand, which plaintiff is entitled to interest from customers in rates. 18.5 percent per year promissory notes issued to the plaintiff, defendant, two requirements that interest them. 18 and 18.5 percent per year, respectively. It is not stated that the interest from any So the interest rate specified in the promissory note, both of these. From the date of the ticket under the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 911 968 695 when the interest rates by the legal bills. The defendant said the money due the plaintiff, who is at fault, it has the right idea. The rate of payments under the promissory note until paid. Completed by the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 224, first paragraph.

Supreme Court to 935/2534.
The plaintiff sued the defendants both jointly issued the bills of exchange and sell them to the plaintiff. The plaintiff charged the bill does not. The plaintiff asked the defendant to pay the bills, both with interest at a rate of 17.5 percent per year as agreed with the plaintiff, it is understandable that the interest in Such a high rate under the bill for it. The end of the plaintiff filed a copy of the draft agreement for the sale of two of the defendants sued by the plaintiff did not obscure The plaintiff filed a breach of contract sales force bills. Not sue to enforce the provisions of the money is coming into force of Section 963 and 973 is not so. The plaintiff sued the defendant shall have the power and without notice to not use the money to the defendant two days before the plaintiff sued the defendant in four of the second contract to sell the bills. Interest rates must be based on the agreed case 2 will be at the rate of 5 percent per year under Section 968 (2) the defendant's breach of contract sales at the two bills. The plaintiff claims the defendant to comply with two laws that do not have a specific age. The age of 10 years.

Supreme Court to 935/2534.
The plaintiff sued the defendants to the bill of sale to the plaintiff and the defendant charged accordingly. Bill did not. The defendant paid the bill with interest at a rate of 17.5 percent per year, as agreed, it is understandable that such an interest. Sales contracts, bills and the filing of the plaintiff to attach a copy of the contract sales to come up with money even when the plaintiff filed a lecture honoring contracts or bills of sale. The plaintiff sued, it is evident that the condition of the plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to comply. Sales contracts, bills and asked to enforce the contract. The plaintiff sued the law. A. The plaintiffs are not authorized to sell the bank branch manager, plaintiff, the plaintiff's bills. A. The plaintiff's attorney to prosecute on the discounting of such bills. The plaintiff has ratified the trade bill to reduce it. The plaintiff filed a breach of contract sales force bills. No action required by the bill. I do not recall notice to not use the money to the defendant within four days, according to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 963 and the interest rate shall be as agreed. Than 5 percent per year under Section 968 (2) sales contracts, bills, no law requires a specific age. The age of 10 years.

Supreme Court in 3915/2533.
Check out the defendant pay the plaintiff to hire tractors and seven installments at the bank refused to cash the check at all. The defendant has paid the outstanding payment by check to the dispute to the plaintiff. But the bank refuses to pay by check another matter. The plaintiff has terminated the contract. I break the lease since both parties check payable to the defendant. Prior to the plaintiff's termination. It is the lease that the plaintiff had already been paid by check instead of cash. I need to hire the plaintiff had not been paid and is overdue. The settlement will be paid out because the bank refuses to pay. Debt does not hold the check until the check is already spent. Defendant is liable for the debt in dispute. When the plaintiff's rights to sell the checks to the bank. Bank bill by check and the plaintiff did not have the money to pay to the bank the check is returned back to the plaintiff sued the defendant shall be entitled to payment by check to both parties.

Supreme Court in 1162/2533.
Check, cross out the words "or bearer" on the left front of the check, and stamped the letter said. "A / C, the transfer of Li Yi" (A/C PAYEEONLY) transferable by check. The payee must be taken into account. If they can transfer to others only by their shape and effect the transfer of shares. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 306, paragraph one, the second paragraph of Section 917 and Section 989 provisions. Which must be made in writing to complete. And will raise up against third persons only upon notice in writing to the transfer. Debtor or the debtor agrees in writing to the transfer, so the three defendants who entered into a compromise in the dispute are willing to pay the plaintiff a check for dispute and the court allowed the case to it. When the plaintiff received in settlement of the case is transferred to the defendant a second payer to a book, or one of the two defendants have consented in writing to the assignment. He is not in dispute that the plaintiff will have recourse to the second defendant, a payer, a message similar to one that is transferable, the second defendant was not liable to reimburse the plaintiff in the dispute.

Supreme Court in 1416/2521.
Law is not forced to take a foreign language translation to ensure the accuracy of any successor to the defendant that the translation is not accurate or inaccurate, however, the defendant would have liked. The debate or the correct translation.

The payer and the plaintiff when the defendant is liable to pay, which has endorsed the bill. I refused to pay the money. The bill was considered by taking a representative payee and bill them accordingly. Civil and Commercial Code, Section 970, therefore the plaintiff is entitled to the honor and interest on the amount of the charge. Rate of five percent per year from the date of payment to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 969.

Was honored for a period of debt repayment, then the plaintiff will not be such a demand.

Inserting, VERIFICATION, using money raised in one's face.

Section 950 identifies the payer or endorsed by any one person or a person is certified. Or use the money I would place money.

The condition is said to be just ahead. One person who is certified or honored in the person's face is inserted into the sign on that.

This page will be inserted into the third parties. Even a person who is liable to pay the bills already. No guarantee, but only

Inserted into the face must give notice without delay. The party to which he is aware of his face to face.

Section 951 certified to honor one's face. In those cases in which the holder shall have recourse under the bill, which was before the tickets can be guaranteed.

With this certification, insert into the page. He will not reject it. This implies that the person who indicates that they are certified. Or use the money I wish it would reject the offer was accepted.

If you ever let him forget it. He would not have recourse to the parties before the people, which is liable to the person.

Section 952 is certified by the insertion into this page. It is made with a specified on the bill. And sign of honor's face is important. The need to specify that the certification is made to any person. If not specified, then you shall give to the payer.

Section 953 certified to honor one's face, who would be liable for the bills. And the endorsement shall be liable to the party of which he is to face. The same is liable to the party.

Section 954 of the money would have to face those who have recourse if the bills are due on or before the due date.

The use of the money. You have to do that, at the latest the next day. But at the end of the period that restricts the opposition is not permitted to use the money.

Section 955 if the bill had already qualified to solve it. Or a person identified as the guards would then take the money from. He must submit the bills to the person at the place of money. If necessary, it must make an objection to not spend the day slowly. But at the end of the time limit for making an objection.

If no objections within the prescribed time. You can identify the party that I intend to spend money. The party, which has already endorsed the bill. Both those who endorse it at a later date shall be released from liability.

Section 956 of the money to fix that. I used to party to party, then the full amount must be used. Except for the seizures, like Section 968 (4).

He did not reject any of the money he used to. You know who that person would be entitled to take recourse to the person who took them, which is enough to be released from liability because of the money.

Section 957 of the money to solve this as evidenced by a receipt must be written into the bill. Indicate that the use of funds to any person. If it does not just identify them. He used the money to be made to the payer.

Exchange with the objection if the objection was made. Must submit to the people who spend money to solve this.

Section 958 money to the person's face would inherit all the rights of the holder of the party which he had used the money instead. And the parties shall be liable to the party. May endorse the bill, but not anymore.

Incidentally, those who endorsed the party which he used to shall be released from liability.

The race to spend money to solve this. He said the money will provide much of the morning. I shall be popular as well.

If you do not follow these procedures. You also know that the money that they will lose the right to take recourse to a person who has enough to be released from liability.

Supreme Court to 628/2505.
Order to pay off the bill ordered to pay a certain amount of money to the payee. There is one person with aval. Who signed up for. But do not use the money to the payee. The payer and payee aval do I give them one heart to receive the honor that such a common and interchangeable. Pat Day, but I paid. And for the loan. Payer would take the money pledged for the movie projector. The payer and the recipient is not specified in another document approval Aval and on. Bills itself as the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 952, this is not that. Endorsement by the honor and saving face is the only payer. To ensure the payment of money to pay for it. Does not change the essence of the original debt. Or a creditor or debtor. Both parties will hold that no implied obligations under the bill. The contract shall be recorded instead. It is not a new debt.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More